The document discusses libraries demonstrating value through assessment. It describes the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and its role in library assessment. ARL uses tools like LibQUAL+ to assess library service quality from the user perspective. The document also discusses the challenges of assessment and showing value, and how ARL is working to develop new methods through its LibValue project to better capture the value and return on investment of library services.
Lecture presented by Dr. Reinabelle C. Reyes at PAARL's Summer Conference on the theme "Library Analytics: Data-driven Library Management, held at Pearl Hotel, Manila on 20-22 April 2016
Lecture presented by Marian Ramos Eclevia at PAARL's Summer Conference on the theme "Library Analytics: Data-driven Library Management", held at Pearl Hotel, Manila on 20-22 April 2016
This presentation provides an analysis of services provided by the benchmarked library websites. The exploratory study includes comparison of these websites against a list of criterion and presents a list of services that are most commonly deployed by the selected websites. In addition to that, the investigators proposed a list of services that could be provided via the KAUST library website.
This presentation was provided by Suzie Allard (Univ Tennessee - Knoxville) during a NISO Virtual Conference on Data Curation, held on Wednesday, August 31
Lecture presented by Dr. Reinabelle C. Reyes at PAARL's Summer Conference on the theme "Library Analytics: Data-driven Library Management, held at Pearl Hotel, Manila on 20-22 April 2016
Lecture presented by Marian Ramos Eclevia at PAARL's Summer Conference on the theme "Library Analytics: Data-driven Library Management", held at Pearl Hotel, Manila on 20-22 April 2016
This presentation provides an analysis of services provided by the benchmarked library websites. The exploratory study includes comparison of these websites against a list of criterion and presents a list of services that are most commonly deployed by the selected websites. In addition to that, the investigators proposed a list of services that could be provided via the KAUST library website.
This presentation was provided by Suzie Allard (Univ Tennessee - Knoxville) during a NISO Virtual Conference on Data Curation, held on Wednesday, August 31
Datavi$: Negotiate Resource Pricing Using Data VisualizationNASIG
Stephanie J. Spratt, presenter
Ready to ask for a reduction in the annual increase of an e-resource product but unclear on how to make your case? Want to try some innovative strategies to avoid spending more than your budget? Want to reduce the amount of heavy renewal work falling right at fiscal close? Attend this presentation to learn techniques on all of that and more!
The speaker will use commonly collected data to show how to combine and visualize metrics to help make a library’s case for requesting reductions in pricing, adjusting service fees, and asking for changes to subscription periods to balance out the renewal workload. Attendees will learn which data to analyze and combine as it relates to pricing negotiations along with the steps involved to make that data come alive in Excel graphs and charts. Alternate data visualization products will also be discussed. The data visualization techniques, not outcomes, will be the focus of this presentation with the goal of attendees taking back which techniques might be worthwhile endeavors at their own institutions. Attendees will also learn about negotiation strategies and internal and external considerations when preparing to negotiate.
Growing an awareness of negotiation techniques and factors in play both inside and outside the library will help librarians make their cases for equitable pricing and models for library resources. The data visualization techniques shown in this presentation will serve as a stepping-off point for any librarian who wishes to use honesty, directness, and real-world scenarios to negotiate pricing for content and other library expenditures.
SwePub is a bibliographic search service, harvesting and offering unified searching of aggregated scientific publication metadata from institutional repositories (IR:s) in Swedish universities and higher education institutions. SwePub has been developed by the National Library of Sweden.
Last year, in response to a government assignment, SwePub released a technical preview of an entirely new service – SwePub Analysis – aimed at researchers and analysts working in the areas of bibliometrics and scientometrics. SwePub Analysis is a bibliometric service enabling users to obtain enriched and validated scientific publication metadata to base their research and analyses on.
SwePub Analysis is built on linked data technologies and, together with data from other research information resources, allows users to query the database to obtain new knowledge concerning research information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain, e.g. richer Open Access information, deeper knowledge of scientific collaboration etcetera.
For the service to be able to provide high quality data, and for users to understand it’s limitations, much effort has been spent on analysing and validating harvested metadata. This enables the service to present data providers with visualised, rich data on which elements are missing or do not meet format specifications and standards. Hopefully this approach will give IR:s incentives to improve data quality.
This presentation outlines the present state of the service and planned development with emphasis on Swepub utilisation of linked data technologies and external data for validation and enrichment. It also contains insights on current developments in improving metadata markup of licenses and open access in order to improve Swedish Open Access statistics for the purposes of reporting.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
Presentation made by [Edmund Klimek, Charles Forrest and Jay Forrest] at the IFLA Library Buildings & Equipment Satellite Meeting, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, August 10-11 2016
Assessing the Impact of Special CollectionsOCLC Research
RLG Programs webinar, Assessing the Impact of Special Collections, Merrilee Proffitt and Jennifer Schaffner, 14 August 2007. Presentation followed by discussion.
Scientometric Mapping of Library and Information Science in Web of Science 8638812142
This is a presentation on Scientometric Study done in Library and Information Science Research as per the data downloaded from Web of Science. This is a presentation of MPhil dissertation submitted to Department of Library and Information Science, Mizoram University under Prof SN Singh.
Datavi$: Negotiate Resource Pricing Using Data VisualizationNASIG
Stephanie J. Spratt, presenter
Ready to ask for a reduction in the annual increase of an e-resource product but unclear on how to make your case? Want to try some innovative strategies to avoid spending more than your budget? Want to reduce the amount of heavy renewal work falling right at fiscal close? Attend this presentation to learn techniques on all of that and more!
The speaker will use commonly collected data to show how to combine and visualize metrics to help make a library’s case for requesting reductions in pricing, adjusting service fees, and asking for changes to subscription periods to balance out the renewal workload. Attendees will learn which data to analyze and combine as it relates to pricing negotiations along with the steps involved to make that data come alive in Excel graphs and charts. Alternate data visualization products will also be discussed. The data visualization techniques, not outcomes, will be the focus of this presentation with the goal of attendees taking back which techniques might be worthwhile endeavors at their own institutions. Attendees will also learn about negotiation strategies and internal and external considerations when preparing to negotiate.
Growing an awareness of negotiation techniques and factors in play both inside and outside the library will help librarians make their cases for equitable pricing and models for library resources. The data visualization techniques shown in this presentation will serve as a stepping-off point for any librarian who wishes to use honesty, directness, and real-world scenarios to negotiate pricing for content and other library expenditures.
SwePub is a bibliographic search service, harvesting and offering unified searching of aggregated scientific publication metadata from institutional repositories (IR:s) in Swedish universities and higher education institutions. SwePub has been developed by the National Library of Sweden.
Last year, in response to a government assignment, SwePub released a technical preview of an entirely new service – SwePub Analysis – aimed at researchers and analysts working in the areas of bibliometrics and scientometrics. SwePub Analysis is a bibliometric service enabling users to obtain enriched and validated scientific publication metadata to base their research and analyses on.
SwePub Analysis is built on linked data technologies and, together with data from other research information resources, allows users to query the database to obtain new knowledge concerning research information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain, e.g. richer Open Access information, deeper knowledge of scientific collaboration etcetera.
For the service to be able to provide high quality data, and for users to understand it’s limitations, much effort has been spent on analysing and validating harvested metadata. This enables the service to present data providers with visualised, rich data on which elements are missing or do not meet format specifications and standards. Hopefully this approach will give IR:s incentives to improve data quality.
This presentation outlines the present state of the service and planned development with emphasis on Swepub utilisation of linked data technologies and external data for validation and enrichment. It also contains insights on current developments in improving metadata markup of licenses and open access in order to improve Swedish Open Access statistics for the purposes of reporting.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
Presentation made by [Edmund Klimek, Charles Forrest and Jay Forrest] at the IFLA Library Buildings & Equipment Satellite Meeting, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, August 10-11 2016
Assessing the Impact of Special CollectionsOCLC Research
RLG Programs webinar, Assessing the Impact of Special Collections, Merrilee Proffitt and Jennifer Schaffner, 14 August 2007. Presentation followed by discussion.
Scientometric Mapping of Library and Information Science in Web of Science 8638812142
This is a presentation on Scientometric Study done in Library and Information Science Research as per the data downloaded from Web of Science. This is a presentation of MPhil dissertation submitted to Department of Library and Information Science, Mizoram University under Prof SN Singh.
A look at our assumptions and healthy ways of questioning them as we deploy different worldviews, methods and tools in library assessment! Don't be afraid to question assumptions -- most of the time the data are in front of us and we are just blind because of our own fundamental assumptions. There is a better way than resting on erroneous assumptions!
Presentación en Congreso de Bibliotecas Universitarias y Especilizadas 27 y 28 de mayo de 2014, organizado por SISIB U. de Chile.
http://bibliotecas.uchile.cl/congreso/programa/index.html
June 18, 2014 NISO Virtual Conference: Transforming Assessment: Alternative Metrics and Other Trends
What Do Alternative Metrics and the 'Flight of the Bumblebee' Have in Common?
- Martha Kyrillidou, PhD, Senior Director of Statistics and Service Quality Programs, Association of Research Libraries (ARL)
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to ResearchLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research.” Presented at the Update on Value of Academic Libraries Initiative (ACRL) at the ALA Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, June 25.
Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to ResearchOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research.” Presented at the Update on Value of Academic Libraries Initiative (ACRL) at the ALA Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, June 25.
How can UK academic libraries respond to the current issues in scholarly publ...Stuart Dempster
Trends in publishing and collections development, and some opportunities for UK academic libraries to transform services to meet institutional and user requirements in a fast changing environment.
Collaboration between libraries, archives and museums: Essential for maintain...tsoleau
This is a presentation a gave on the topic of my Master\'s portfolio at UCLA in Nov 2009. Most of the content was spoken and not included in the slides, but you can still get the idea.
The Evolving Collection and Shift to OpenLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Cathy King. 2020. “The Evolving Collection and Shift to Open.” Presented at the Research Information Exchange, February 14, 2020, Melbourne, Australia.
Foundations to Actions: Extending Innovations to Digital Libraries in Partner...Trish Rose-Sandler
This talk was given by Trish Rose-Sandler, Leora Siegel, Katie Mika, Pamela McClanahan, Ariadne Rehbein, Marissa Kings, and Alicia Esquivel at the DPLAFest in Chicago on April 21 2017
Assessing the Impact of the Library in the Research Ecosystem: CNI 2018 sprin...Megan Hurst
Libraries play an increasingly comprehensive role in the research lifecycle, yet metrics and measures (both qualitative and quantitative) that illustrate the fundamental role and impact of the library in research still need to be developed. Research libraries need first to define the values by which they want to be measured, rather than trying to manifest those values from the data that they have traditionally collected. To this end, the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) underwent a visioning process for its assessment program between February and October 2017. The goal of this project was to develop a forward-looking program that advances the organizational outcomes of the 21st century research library. One result of the visioning process was a clearly elaborated need for research libraries to demonstrate their function in advancing and collaborating in the research enterprise. Rather than trying to define “impact” and “value” independently, the new ARL assessment program will set the context for understanding and communicating the stories of the research library to external stakeholders and provide the tools for members to tell this story locally. At the heart of this work is a framework that aims to draw a map of the landscape of services and functions provided across all research libraries. The comprehensive framework, and proposed new data points, will help research libraries translate their values into measures. The presenters will demonstrate how this collaboratively developed (and evolving) framework paints a map of the research library assessment landscape and how it will be used to understand and measure the role of the library in supporting institutional missions.
Lecture presented by Fe Angela M. Verzosa at PAARL’s One-Day Seminar on the theme "Revitalized Library Networking: PAARLNet at the Frontline" (Epifanio de los Santos Auditorium, The National Library, T.M. Kalaw, Manila, 25 November 2010)
Evolving Scholarly Record - implications for rank and reputation assessmentConstance Malpas
Wrap-up presentation from OCLC Research Library Partner meeting, San Francisco, 3-4 June 2015, joining up discussions from Stewardship of the Evolving Scholarly Record workshop and Library Roles in Research Reputation and Ranking.
Evolving Scholarly Record - implications for rank and reputation assessment
Kyrillidou final
1. From Faith to Evidence:From Faith to Evidence:
Demonstrating the Value of LibrariesDemonstrating the Value of Libraries
Martha Kyrillidou
Directora del Programa Estadística y Calidad de Servicio de
la Association of Research Libraries, ARL (Estados Unidos)
Congreso de Bibliotecas Universitarias Y Especializadas
Santiago de Chile
28 de mayo, 2014
2. http://www.arl.org
OverviewOverview
• ARL (Association of Research Libraries)
• Demonstrating value
• Assessment librarians
• StatsQUAL – LibQUAL+
• LIBValue (emphasis on Commons)
• Testing New Methods
• Value Scorecard (Town & Kyrillidou, 2013)
• Strategy and Metrics
Association of Research Libraries
3. http://www.arl.org
ARL Member InstitutionsARL Member Institutions
• 115 ARL university libraries
– 73 medical libraries
– 77 law libraries
• 10,000+ professional staff members
– About 1,000 staff members at medical libraries
– A little more than 700 staff members in law libraries
• 10 nonuniversity ARL members
– About 4,000 professional staff members
• Full List of Member Institutions:
http://www.arl.org/
6. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
ARL Statistics and AssessmentARL Statistics and Assessment
…To describeand measure the
performance of research
librariesand their contribution to
teaching, research, scholarship and community
service …
7. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
ARL Statistics and AssessmentARL Statistics and Assessment
…To describe and measure the performance of research
libraries and their contributionto
teaching, research,
scholarshipand community service
…
8. http://www.arl.org
James Thayer Gerould (1906-1920)James Thayer Gerould (1906-1920)
• What would you
like to know about
research libraries if
you were the
library director at
the U of Minessota
in 1906?
9. http://www.arl.org
Wendy Pradt Lougee (2002-present)Wendy Pradt Lougee (2002-present)
• What would you
like to know about
research libraries if
you were the
library director at
the U of Minessota
in 2014?
10. http://www.arl.org
In the beginning …In the beginning …
ARL StatisticsARL Statistics
• www.arlstatistics.org
ARL Statistics
®
1906 – present
Interactive
analytics
PDF
Or print
11. http://www.arl.org
Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2011
Serial
Expenditures
(+402%)
Library
Materials
(+302%)
TOTAL
(+188%)
Total Salaries
(+153%)
Operating
Expenditures
(+128%)
CPI
(+106%)
Monograph
Expenditures
(+71%)
PercentChangesince1986
Source: ARL Statistics 2010-11, Copyright, Association of Research Libraries, 2011
14. Library Expenditures as a Percent of
University Expenditures in 40 ARL Libraries 1982-2009
Copyright, Association of Research Libraries, 2009
15. The data and the models
• I hesitate to hang the future of libraries on a
demonstrable effect size for the equation,
L = $$$
– Rachel Applegate , Indiana University SLIS
16. Why study value
• Faced with difficult economic times and
university budget cuts, the value of the library
to the wider goals of the university is
increasingly questioned.
– Introduction to the Lib-Value Project
» www.libvalue.org
Association of Research Libraries
17. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
What’s the effect?What’s the effect?
• Bangor University considers removing librarians posted by Blake on
Thursday January 27, @07:30AM -753 hits
Ms Information writes "News from the University of Wales Bangor in the
UK. senior management no longer feel that subject librarians / academic
liaison librarians are needed in the modern academic library. They have
made restructuring proposals which include removing all but one of the
subject librarians and a tier of the library management, including the Head
of Bibliographic Services. The university management thinks that
technology has 'deskilled' literature searching. As far as I know, this
proposal is unprecedented in the United Kingdom. In essence, there will
remain 4 professional librarians serving a 'research-led' university of 8,000
plus FTEs and with 8 library sites. These will be the university librarian,
cataloguing librarian, acquisitions librarian and Law librarian.
• Has anything like this happened anywhere that you know of? If so, what
have been the effects?
19. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
Assessment is…Assessment is…
“…a structured process to learn about
communities and evaluate how well the
library supports them.”
- Steve Hiller, Director of Assessment & Planning
University of Washington Libraries
20. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
Assessment can…Assessment can…
• Support decision making
• Establish accountability
• Strengthen organizational mission, goals, and
objectives
• Realign library goals and mission statements
with the needs of users
• Identify trends in user behaviors and
technology
• Measure learning outcomes and impact
• Improve programs and services
21. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
Good Analytical Skills neededGood Analytical Skills needed
• Quantitative Analysis: IBM SPSS, SAS BI
• Qualitative Analysis: Atlas.ti, NVivo
• Data collection: Qualtrics, Survey Monkey,
FormStack
• Data storage: SQL Server, Access, Excel
• Reporting: Crystal Reports, SPSS, SQL, Excel,
• Web delivery: interactive charts, analytics,
Tableau, etc.
• Web development, usability, user experience?
22. http://www.arl.org
arl-assess@arl.orgarl-assess@arl.org
• Anyone with an interest in library assessment
• Assessment librarians
• User Experience and Planning
• Anthropologists
• Space planners
• Functional area leaders involved in
assessment (teaching and learning, special
collections, spaces)
Join the arl-assess google group
Association of Research Libraries
23. The Value of Academic Libraries
http://www.acrl.ala.org/value/
The Value of Libraries for
Research and Researchers
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-
accessing-information-resources/value-
libraries-research-and-researchers
24. ARL Profiles:
Research Libraries 2010
• Serve the public good
• Expand globally
• Set standards
• Explore best practices
• Establish national and
international visibility
http://www.arl.org/stats/index/profiles/index.shtml
27. StatsQUAL®
A gateway to library assessment tools that describe the role,
character, and impact of physical and digital libraries.
LibQUAL+®
is a
rigorously tested Web-
based survey that
libraries use to solicit,
track, understand, and
act upon users‘ opinions
of service quality.
LibQUAL+®
MINES
for Libraries®
Measuring the Impact of
Networked Electronic
Resources (MINES) is an
online transaction- based
survey that collects data on
the purpose of use of
electronic resources and
the demographics of users.
ClimateQUAL®
ClimateQUAL®
:
Organizational Climate
and Diversity Assessment is
an online survey that
measures staff perceptions
about: (a) the library's
commitment to the
principles of diversity, (b)
organizational policies and
procedures, and (c) staff
attitudes.
ARL
Statistics®
ARL Statistics™ is a series
of annual publications that
describe the collections,
expenditures, staffing, and
service activities for
Association of Research
Libraries (ARL) member
libraries.
LibValue
LibValue is a series of
tested methods that
capture Return on
Investment and Value of
library services.
29. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
The ChallengeThe Challenge
“The difficulty lies in trying to find a single model
or set of simple indicators that can be used by
different institutions, and that will compare
something across large groups that is by
definition only locally applicable—i.e., how well
a library meets the needs of its institution.
Librarians have either made do with
oversimplified national data or have undertaken
customized local evaluations of effectiveness,
but there has not been devised an effective way
to link the two”
Sarah Pritchard, Dean of Libraries, Northwestern University
30. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
TheThe LibQUAL+LibQUAL+®®
PremisePremise
PERCEPTIONS SERVICE
“….only customers judge quality;
all other judgments are essentially
irrelevant”
Note. Zeithaml, Parasuraman, Berry. (1999).
Delivering quality service. NY: The Free Press.
31. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
……a revolution in the makinga revolution in the making
Il est plus nécessaire d'étudier les hommes que
les livres
—FRANÇOIS DE LA ROCHEFOUCAULD (1613–1680)
32. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
Dimensions ofDimensions of
Library Service QualityLibrary Service Quality
Information Control
Library
Service
Quality
Self-Reliance
Equipment
Timeliness
Ease of Navigation
Convenience
Scope of Content
Affect of Service
Library as Place
Reliability
Assurance
Responsiveness
Empathy
Refuge
Symbol
Utilitarian Space
34. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
Dimensions ofDimensions of
Library Service QualityLibrary Service Quality
Information Control
Library
Service
Quality
Self-Reliance
Equipment
Timeliness
Ease of Navigation
Convenience
Scope of Content
Affect of Service
Library as Place
Reliability
Assurance
Responsiveness
Empathy
Refuge
Symbol
Utilitarian Space
35. -1.50
0.50
2.50
4.50
6.50
8.50
18 - 22 yrs
23 - 30 yrs
31 - 45 yrs
46 - 65 yrs
Over 65
Ratingscale(1=Extremelypoorto9=Extremelygood)
Age Group
A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own
Perceived
Minimum
Desired
Adequacy
1/27/14
2014 ALA Midwinter Meeting |-
Nisa Bakkalbasi, Columbia University LibQUAL+ 35
40. http://www.arl.orgAssociation of Research Libraries
ContributionsContributions
• LibQUAL+®
methodology focuses on success from the
user’s point of view (outcomes)
• Demonstrates that a Web-based survey can handle
large numbers; users are willing to fill it out; and
survey can be executed quickly with minimal expense
• LibQUAL+®
requires limited local survey expertise and
resources
• Analysis available at local and inter-institutional levels
• Many opportunities for using demographics to discern
user behaviors
43. http://www.arl.org
…is a quantitative measure expressed as a
ratio of the value returned to the institution for
each monetary unit invested in the library.
Return on investment is also…
…values of all types that come to stakeholders and
the institution from the library’s collections,
services, and contribution to its communities.
45. Changing Higher Education Landscape
• Outcomes-based budget
• Complete College Act, 2010
• A Top 25 Mandate, 2009
46. New University Strategic Plan
The Five Top 25 Strategic Priorities
•Undergraduate Education
•Graduate Education
•Research and Creative
Activity
•Faculty and Staff
•Infrastructure and
resources
48. UT Libraries’ Strategic Plan
Teaching and Learning
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1, 2, & 5)
•Engage in transformative partnerships in instruction
•Develop and maintain robust facilities in support of teaching
and learning
Research Support, Discover, and Access
(Vol Vision Imperatives 4, 5, & 3)
•Develop robust, user-driven, and user-centered
•Maintain campus leadership in open access, intellectual
property, and rights policy
Digital Initiatives, Scholarly Communication, and
Technology Innovation
•Lead new initiatives in data curation
The 24-Hour Intellectual and Social Hub
•Provide services, activities, and resources to welcome and
acclimate students to the University community and to enhance
the college experience
Outreach and Marketing
•Provide bold communication program and strategies
The 24-Hour Intellectual and Social Hub
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1 & 5)
•Provide services, activities, and resources to
welcome and acclimate students to the university
community and to enhance the college experience
•Provide safe, secure, and inspiring spaces
•Maximize and diversify user space to more fully
support the widest range of user needs
The 24-Hour Intellectual and Social Hub
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1 & 5)
•Provide services, activities, and resources to
welcome and acclimate students to the university
community and to enhance the college experience
•Provide safe, secure, and inspiring spaces
•Maximize and diversify user space to more fully
support the widest range of user needs
49. UT Libraries’ Strategic Plan
Teaching and Learning
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1, 2, & 5)
•Engage in transformative partnerships in instruction
•Develop and maintain robust facilities in support of teaching
and learning
Research Support, Discover, and Access
(Vol Vision Imperatives 4, 5, & 3)
•Develop robust, user-driven, and user-centered
•Maintain campus leadership in open access, intellectual
property, and rights polic
Digital Initiatives, Scholarly Communication, and
Technology Innovation
(Vol Vision Imperatives 3, 4, & 5)
•Lead new initiatives in data curation
The 24-Hour Intellectual and Social Hub
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1 & 5)
•Provide services, activities, and resources to welcome…
Outreach and Marketing
(Vol Vision Imperatives 1-5)
50. The old paradigm
• Comparables
– “X is like us, so we should have their budget.”
• Stoke Rivalries
– “We must be better than X.”
• Inflation factor
– “Let’s scare ‘em with scary inflation numbers.”
51. The New Paradigm:
Student success outcomes (mostly)
• Recruitment
• Diversity
• Retention
• Graduation Rates
(4 & 6 year)
• Out placement
53. Commons Spaces
• Learning Commons
– Collection of resources and services
• Different styles of learning and studying
• Technology
• Groupwork
• Interrelationship of
services for students
54. Commons Spaces & Student Success
Assess the value of library resources and services in the Commons in
support of the instructional mission of the University
a. Define “success”
b. Aggregate available data
c. Gather new information
d. Make meaningful
connections
55. Aggregate Existing Data
a. Existing Data
• Automatically collected usage data
• Data collected in person by service providers
• Demographic data on retention, success, and years to
graduation
• Student exit surveys
• LibQual
• NSSE survey data
• UT Fact Book
56. Gather New Data
a. Existing Data b. Needed Data
• Student-reported use of Commons
spaces and services
• Student-reported value of
Commons spaces and services
• Augmented university data set
including the ability to track
individual progress toward degree
data
• Admissions data
• Automatically collected usage data
• Data collected in person by service providers
• Demographic data on retention, success, and years
to graduation
• Student exit surveys
• LibQUAL+
• NSSE survey data
• UT Fact Book
57. Linking Survey Responses to
Student Data
Human Subjects
– Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act
– Compliance with state and federal regulations
58. Protecting Subjects
• You must be 18 or older to participate.
• Within the survey we ask for your UT NetID to
use to retrieve and link admissions and progress-
towards-degree data about you to the survey
results. Your NetID will be removed from the
survey data before the data is retrieved. The
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
will oversee the data retrieval.
• Data on a protected server.
• Confidentiality of data. Data reported
anonymously.
59.
60. Gym Bags and Mortarboards
• Student success measures
– First Year Retention and 5 year graduation
• 5211 students in sample (2001)
• Found that if a student used CRF 25 times
over the semester, increased a student’s
predicted probability of first year retention
by 1% and predicted probability of 5 year
graduation by 2% (pg. 59)
61. Layers of Data
Libraries Data (13 Access Points)
Circulation, Digital, Instruction, Reference, and Workstation
Libraries Data (13 Access Points)
Circulation, Digital, Instruction, Reference, and Workstation
Office of Institutional Research Demographics Data
College, Level, Major, Gender, Ethnicity, Age
Office of Institutional Research Demographics Data
College, Level, Major, Gender, Ethnicity, Age
Office of Institutional Research Performance Data
Term and Cum GPA, Retention
Office of Institutional Research Performance Data
Term and Cum GPA, Retention
66. Teams Color KEY: Research Services Acquisition & Metadata Services Access & Delivery Services Digital Learning &
Scholarship Scholarly Resources & Special Collections Planning, Budgets & Assessment
Strategy Map: TEAM responsibilities
Mission: KSL is the knowledge and creativity commons of CWRU
Financial Perspective
Services and
Engagement Collection Connection Creation and Curation
Learning
And
Growth
Customer Perspective
Effectively implement
reorganization and strategic plan
implementation
Effectively implement
reorganization and strategic plan
implementation
T.1. Implement service
assessment and accountability to
the CWRU community
T.1. Implement service
assessment and accountability to
the CWRU community
D.1. & D.2. Create and
implement global resources and
diversity plan
D.1. & D.2. Create and
implement global resources and
diversity plan
I.3. Define and
deploy a digital
learning and
research strategy
I.3. Define and
deploy a digital
learning and
research strategy
I.4. Increase student fluency in
knowledge discovery and
processing
I.4. Increase student fluency in
knowledge discovery and
processing
Vision: KSL will be the information laboratory for knowledge collection, connection, creation and curation
67. “We want our communities to say that Libraries and Cultural Resources … “ “Financially we need to… “
“Internally we will focus on…”
“To be ready for the future we must….”
Libraries and Cultural Resources inspires its communities to discover,
explore, and create knowledge through innovative collections,
technologically advanced facilities, and engaged expertise. [15 May 2012]
Communications by … Program Management by … Operations Management by …
68. http://www.arl.org
Town and Kyrillidou (2013)Town and Kyrillidou (2013)
• The value which stakeholders seek from
libraries is transcendent, in the sense that the
impact demonstrated must be beyond the
library and immediate satisfaction or fulfillment.
Library assessment effort to date has been
(mainly) about quality rather than value.
Association of Research Libraries
69. http://www.arl.org
A Value ScorecardA Value Scorecard
• Relationship & reputation capital
• Organisational capital
– Tangible assets and resources
– Intangible and meta-assets
• Library virtue
– Impact and social capital
• Library momentum
70. What is Important to Your President?
(Hint: It’s not the number of books you check out.)
72. http://www.arl.org
Final BlessingsFinal Blessings
• Indulge your curiosity
• Influence your friends
• Enable your organization.
– May your analytics always be good – and your
judgment even better.
» Robert Morison, Analytics at Work
73. http://www.arl.org
Some current issuesSome current issues
• Importance of internal relationships and
external partnerships
• Extension of traditional role
– Research publication and research data
• Sustaining our academic role in planning
• Digital media, services and curation
• Capability, capacity and critical mass
• Library as reputational enhancer …
Is this the first year that you are working on the ARL Statistics for your institution?
Did you attend last year’s webcast?
Slide-13: All this does not mean we are spending less in gross dollar amounts. Quite the reverse, we are spending more, but getting less for it. This is because the libraries share of the higher education budget is declining, while at the same time the “Library Price Index” is inflating faster than the “Higher Education Price Index” or the “Consmer Price Index.”
Slide-10: Here is a trend line created from ARL data and it shows the change in student enrollment in ARL member institutions from 1967 up to 2003. This trend line is truly startling. The average enrollment has grown from 12K IN 1967 TO 23K IN 2006. This increase in enrollments put enormous pressure on libraries to expand service capacity. And, of course, this chart does not illustrate the changes in information seeking behavior of the new generations of students with their expectations for technology driven tools and resources.
Slide-9: Let me turn briefly to some of the long-term trends that research libraries face. Here is a sample of 40 ARL libraries illustrating library expenditures as a percent of university expenditures for the last quarter century. And this chart illustrates clearly that the decline in funding is accelerating, particularly for libraries.
IC-3 - The printed library materials I need for my work
Faculty though were not convinced that libraries had the print the needed in 2003 – they do nowadays it looks like with perceptions scores finally meeting minimum expectations starting with 2008.
IC-8 - Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work *Highest average Desired rating of any sub-group (Faculty)
Faculty to this day do not think that the greatest and richest libraries in the world offering a couple of hundred thousand journal subscriptions, have enough subscriptions to satisfy their needs – or better said their minimum expectations.
IC-2 - A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own
But the story is different when it comes to faculty where their perceptions of how libraries are doing shows that they do not meet their minimum expectations.
In general, undergraduate students need a good library space where they can use it in a variety of ways – individual study, group study, small/large, quiet, interactive … faculty need mostly content and good access to that content. And neither of them care that much for the ‘affect of service’ element – not that they do not want the librarian’s personal touch but they seem happen with it in general and the differentiating attraction of the library for them in respectively space for undergraduate students and collections for faculty.
Also University of Pittsburgh, Drexel, 4 universities in NY
$59 million expansion –broke ground in May 2011
Other campus entities are doing this (tying use to academic success) -- Even a seemingly small connection between usage and academic success can have a big impact.
Found that if a student used CRF 25 times over the semester, increased a student’s predicted probability of first year retention by 1% and predicted probability of 5 year graduation by 2% (pg. 59)
“although these increases may at first seem relatively small, they are in fact noteworthy because they represent positive changes in retention and graduation rates that can be influenced by the institution. As has been show by previous studies of retention and graduation rates, many of the most powerful predictors are fixed.” (pg 66)