This summary provides the key details from the document in 3 sentences: The document discusses a study that investigated the English pronunciation competence of 48 second semester civil engineering students in Samarinda State Polytechnic, Indonesia. The students were tested on pronouncing 100 words of varying syllable lengths. The results found the average score was 75 (classified as "fair"), with no students scoring below 50, though some exercises could help students improve pronunciation.

1. ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION COMPETENCE OF THE SECOND
SEMESTER STUDENTS CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF
SAMARINDA STATE POLYTECHNIC
Sektalonir Oscarini Wati Bhakti, S.Pd., M.Pd
(Staf Pengajar MKDU Jurusan Teknik Sipil Polnes)
Fariyanti, S.E., M.Si
(staf Pengajar Jurusan Akuntansi)
Abstract
This research investigated the second semester students’ pronunciation competence
who are studying in Civil Engineering Department. This research belongs to
quantitative research which the data taken from the test. The students were asked to
pronounce 100 words that consisted of 1-syllable, 2-syllable, 3-syllable, and 4 and
more-syllable words. The result of the test showed that the average score was 75 so
that it was classified into “Fair”. It also showed that no students got score under 50.
It means that no students had problem in pronouncing the words of test. There were
11 students got fair score, between 60 – 69, and two students got poor score, between
50 -59. Although, it was said that no students got no problem in pronouncing the
words, but it needed considering that those students still need to have some exercises
to pronounce the words correctly.
INTRODUCTION
Pronunciation is one of essential aspect in learning English. The deficiency in
pronunciation ability can affect the ability of speech production. Carruthers (2007),
states that good pronunciation is one of the foundations of effective spoken
communication. If speakers pronounce the words clearly and correctly, their
audience interlocutor would be able to understand what they are trying to express
easily. However, misunderstanding, in many cases, occurs when words are
1

2. inaccurately pronounced. Besides the ability to communicate, Nation and Newton
(2009) informs that the lack of stable pronunciation can seriously affect students’
memory. The amount of stable pronunciation knowledge can help the learners
enhance long-term memory capacity.
Pronunciation must be acquired by the students since it is a fundamental skill
that affect comprehensions. There are two keys problems with pronunciation
teaching. First, it is likely to be neglected, second, if it is not neglected, it tends to be
reactive to a particular problem that has arisen in the classroom rather than being
strategically planned (Kelly: 2000).
Besides those problems above, some factors also reveal in teaching
pronunciation as the results of some researches of pronunciations. Some of them are
the limitation of time in pronunciation practice in traditional classroom instruction,
the less attention in speaking and listening skills of the teachers in the classroom, the
students attitudes that tends to give less attention to the speaking and listening skills,
and the teachers’ insufficient skill in teaching pronunciation.
THE PURPOSE AND THE SIGNIFICANT
The purpose of the research was to find out the English Pronunciation
Competence of the second semester students Civil Engineering Department of
Samarinda State Polytechnic. The significant that gained from the research were the
researcher would expect to be able to share good inputs about the students’ English
pronunciation competence, to contribute valuable information to English lecturers
and Management of Samarinda State Polytechnic, and to give some additional
information to anyone who is interested in investigating the same area of research.
REVIEW OF LITERATURES
The Definition of Pronunciation
There are some definitions of pronunciation that delivers by some researchers.
Macháčková (2012:9) defines pronunciation as a way how sounds are articulated by
speakers marking their social class, education and so forth. According to
www.nceltr.edu.au/pdamep , pronunciation refers to the production of sounds that we
2

3. use to make meaning. It includes attention to the particular sounds of a language
(segments), aspects of speech beyond the level of the individual sound, such as
intonation, phrasing, stress, timing, rhythm (suprasegmental aspects), how the voice
is projected (voice quality) and, in its broadest definition, attention to gestures and
expressions that are closely related to the way we speak a language (2002:1).
Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) also states
pronunciations includes all those aspects of speech which make for an easily
intelligible flow of speech, including segmental articulation, rhythm, intonation and
phrasing, and more peripherally even gesture, body language and eye contact.
Pronunciation is an essential ingredient of oral communication, which also includes
grammar, vocabulary choice, and cultural considerations and so on (2001:6).
It could be concluded that pronunciation is an essential aspect in
communicating. A person who has a good pronunciation even not in other aspects,
such as grammar, will be understood by his partner in speaking. Even pronunciation
has connection to grammar, especially in English. The speaker who pronounces
correctly the endings of the words, for example, can give grammatical information.
The Factors Contributing to Students’ Pronunciation
Kenworthy, Collier and Brown in Yangklang (2006) propose six other factors
that affect student’s pronunciation, i.e., native language, age, exposure, innate
phonetic ability, identity and language ego and motivation and concern for good
pronunciation ability.
The native language will be the most influential factor affecting a students’
pronunciation. If the students are familiar with the sound system of their native
language, they will be able to diagnose their own difficulties. Many L1-L2 carryovers
can be overcome through a focused awareness and effort onthe learners’ part.
Age is not the crucial and only factor that affects learning or improving
pronunciation abilities. Adults were probably able to learn second language
phonology as well as children did, in a direct way, using a traditional listen and-repeat
exercise, minimal pairs in the context of the sentences, conversation and role
3

4. playing. Moreover, the older students were faster and more efficient than younger
students in the early states of language learning. Older students and adolescents
developed their second language skills continuously, but adults would diminish after
the first year. However, there was no evidence for a simple and straightforward link
between age and ability in pronunciation of a new language. Both younger learners
and adults can improve their pronunciation ability.
Various studies compared the pronunciation accuracy of people living in
English-speaking countries and those who did not. It seemed that the amount of
exposure is a contributing factor but not a necessary factor for the development of
pronunciation skill.
This skill is sometimes called ‘phonetic coding ability’. It is a common view
that some people have a ‘better ear’ for a foreign language than others. Although
students may have had exposure to a foreign language as children and attuned to
phonetic discrimination, some studies have suggested that some elements of learning
are a matter of awareness of the different sounds. Pronunciation can improve with
effort and concentration on those sounds.
Another influence was one’s attitude toward speakers of the target language and
the extent to which the language ego identified with those speakers. Students with a
positive attitude toward the people who spoke the language were likely to learn
pronunciation more successfully. They were not afraid of the second identity that may
have been emerging within them.
The learners’ motivation can be the strongest factor. If the learners’ motivation
is high, then they will be willing to improve their abilities by themselves. On the
other hand, if they do not see the value or care about pronunciation, they may not be
motivated to do well.
4

5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This research applied quantitative design that is about explaining phenomena
by collecting quantitative data that are analyzed using mathematically based methods
(Muijs, 2004:11).
The Research Context
This research was designed to describe English reading problem of Civil
Engineering of Samarinda State Polytechnic, East Kalimantan. This research will use
quantitative method. All the participants were second semester students Civil
Engineering Department of Samarinda State Polytechnic.
Population
In this research, the researcher took all second semester Civil Engineering
Department students of Samarinda State Polytechnic as the population. The
researcher found out that it was possible to give the test to all second semester Civil
Engineering Department students of Samarinda State Polytechnic as long as they
were still in the same campus.
Data Collection Techniques
The instrument used in this study was a test that aimed to investigate the
participants’ pronunciation competence. Since one of the objectives of the current
study focuses on English pronunciation and as far as the syllable numbers are
concerned, these 100 words were divided into four groups: one syllable (e.g. read,
street), two-syllable words (e.g., process, data), three-syllable words (e.g., engineer,
energy), four and more -syllable words (e.g., automatic, construction) with 25 words
each. All of these words selected were arranged in the ascending order based on their
number of syllables. That was, the test begins with a group of one-syllable words and
ends with four and more-syllable words. The words were taken from Civil
Engineering handbook.
5

6. Data Collection Procedures
The researcher found out how many participants would be her population of
the research. The data of the participants were gotten from the Academic Department
of Samarinda State Polytechnic that concerns about the students’ data. After figuring
out the number of the population, then the researcher constructed the the test.
Data Analysis
Percentage of students passing the test would be used to determine the
participants’ pronunciation competence. They were classified that below 50 will be
problem area.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
Before conducting the test, the researcher conducted pilot test to ten the
second students of Diploma Four of Civil Engineering Department to find out the
validity and the reliability of test. The validity of the 1-syllable word was 0.7246, the
validity of the 2-syllable words was 0.7521, the validity of the 3-syllable word was
0.7246, and the validity of the 4 and more-syllable word was 0.7456. The reliability
of the 1-syllable words was 0.9646, the reliability of 2-syllable words was 0.9646, the
reliability of 3-syllable word was 0.9895, and the reliability of 4 and more syllable
words was 0.9831. And there were 20 invalid number, so that there were 100 valid
number.
The pronunciation test was consisted of four parts. They were one-syllable
words, two-syllable words, three-syllable words, and four and more-syllable words.
After conducting the test to the second semester students of civil Engineering of
Samarinda State Polytechnic, the researcher scored the test. Then, the researcher
tabulated the data to find out the mean score and the number of the students who got
the problem in pronunciation or not.
From table 1., we can see that there were 48 students who conducted the test.
And the highest score was 92 and the lowest score was 56. And the average score
6

7. was 75. We also can see that there were no students who got the problem in
pronunciation because no one got score under 50.
Table 1. The Student’s Score of the Pronunciation Test
7

8. In spite of the good score, the researcher also classified the score into scoring
standard according to Arikunto (1989:249). From the conversion table, we can find
that 16 students (33%) got excellent score (A), 19 students (40%) got good score (B),
11 students (23%) got fair score (C), two students (4 %) got poor score (D), and no
students failed in this test.
Table 2. The Conversion Table
Range of
Score
Interpretation
Letter
Grade
Number of
Students
Percentage
80 – 100 Excellent A 16 33
60 – 79 Good B 19 40
60 – 69 Fair C 11 23
40 – 59 Poor D 2 4
0 – 39 Fail E 0 0
8

9. The researcher also tried to find out which syllable was the most difficult and
easiest for the students to pronounce. From the table we can see that 2-syllable word
was the easiest syllable to be pronounced and 4 and more-syllable word was the most
difficult one.
For 1-syllable word, the easiest word was number 13 because 45 students were
correct to pronounce it and the most difficult word was number 3. For 2-syllable
word, the easiest words were number 12, 13, and 14 because all the students could
pronounce it correctly but there were only 35 students could pronounce number 18
correctly. For 3-syllable words, there were 27 students could pronounce number 3
correctly so that it was considered as the most difficult word while the easiest words
were number 13 and 14. The easiest word for 4 and more-syllable word were number
1 and 12 because there were 36 students could pronounce them correctly. And the
most difficult word for 4 and more syllable was number 10.
9

10. Table 3. The Test Analysis
.
Conclusions
This research investigated the English pronunciation competence of the
second semester students of Civil Engineering Department of Samarinda State
Polytechnic. The students were tested by pronouncing 100 words that consist of 1-
10

11. syllables words, 2-syllable words, 3-syllable words, and 4-more syllable words. Each
syllable was consisted of 25 words.
The research revealed that no students had problem in pronouncing the words
that always appear in their reading about civil engineering. Nevertheless, the average
score was 75 or categorized in “fair”. There were 16 students got excellent scores
(33%), 19 students got good scores (40%), 11 students got fair scores (23%0, two
students got poor scores (4%), and no students got fail score. The most difficult
syllable to be pronounced was 2-syllable word and the easiest was 1-syllable words
Suggestions
According on the findings of the research, the researchers would like to give
some suggestion that could give contribution to the management of Samarinda State
Polytechnic. Because most of the participants no students got problem in
pronouncing the words, but the average score was only 75 (fair). It means that there
are still ways to increase the students competence in pronouncing the words.
First, the management needs to appeal to the English lecturers to give some
reading exercises to their students, not only silent reading but also loud reading, so
that the students are able to find out to pronounce the words correctly. And then, the
English lectures need to conduct the pronunciation test so that the teacher will find
out their competence in English pronunciation.
References
AMEP Research Centre. www.nceltr.edu.au/pdamep (retrived April 20,2013)
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2003, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendiikan, Jakarta: PT. Bina
Aksara
Carruthers, S. 2007. Articulatory Training on Facial Movements Using the Webcam
Pronunciation Mirror: A Pilot Study. HPU TESL Working paper Series, 5(1),
3-17.
11

12. Department of Education Training and Youth Affair (DETYA). 2001. Teaching
Pronunciation: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers. Three Frameworks for
an Integrated Approach. New South Wales Department of Education and
Training
Eva, Farida. 2001. A Study of the Repetition Drill Towards the English
Pronunciation of the Fourth Grade Elementary School Students of SDN 018
Samarinda in 1999/2000 Academic Year. English Department Faculty of
Teacher Trainning and Education Mulawarman University. Samarinda. 2001
Gilbert, Judy B. 2008. Teaching Pronunciation Using the Prosody Pyramid.
Cambridge University Press
Imamesup, Ampawan. 2011. The Study of the Effectiveness of Audioarticulation
Model in Improving Thai Learners’ Pronunciation of Fricative Sounds. Master
of Arts Degree in Teaching as a Foreign Language at Srinakharinwirot
University
Khamkhien, Attapol. 2010. Thai Learners’ English Pronunciation Competence:
Lesson Learned From Word Stress Assignment. Journal off Language
Teaching and Research, Vol.1, No. 6, pp. 757-764, November 2010.
Kelly, G. 2000. How to Teach Pronunciation (1st Ed). London: Longman/Pearson
Education Limited
Machackova, Eva. 2012. Teaching English Pronunciation to Secondary School
Students with Focus on “th” Consonants. Masaryk University Brno Faculty of
Education Department of English Language and Literature
Tomcikova, Nad’a. 2006. Developing Pronunciation With Young Learners.
University of Pardubice Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Department of English
and American Studies
Varasarin. Patchara. 2007. An Action Research Study of Pronunciation Training,
Language Learning Strategies and Speaking Confidence. School of Education
Faculty of Arts, Education and Human Development Victoria University
Yangklang, W. 2006. Improving English Final /-l/ Pronunciation of Thai Students
Through Computer-Assisted Instruction Program. Suranaree University of
Technology. Master of English Language Studies
12