Global supply chains expose companies to risks associated with human rights abuses in their supply chain. Governments and international organizations are taking coordinated actions to address these issues through legislation and policies. The US, UK, EU, and ILO are developing regulations requiring companies to conduct due diligence on their suppliers to prevent forced labor, slavery, and human trafficking. While progress is being made, human rights risks in global supply chains remain a complex problem requiring a collaborative global solution that also protects victims.
This presentation by Judge Ian S. Forrester from the General Court of the European Union was made during the discussion “Are competition and democracy symbiotic?” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/283.
Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal ThinkingGus Agosto
This presentation follows the evolution of thinking about competition since the passage of the Sherman Act in 1890 as reflected by major antitrust decisions and research in industrial organization. It divide the U.S. antitrust experience into five periods and discuss each period's legal trends and economic thinking in three core areas of antitrust: cartels, cooperation, or other interactions among independent firms; abusive conduct by dominant firms; and mergers.
This presentation by Judge Ian S. Forrester from the General Court of the European Union was made during the discussion “Are competition and democracy symbiotic?” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/283.
Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal ThinkingGus Agosto
This presentation follows the evolution of thinking about competition since the passage of the Sherman Act in 1890 as reflected by major antitrust decisions and research in industrial organization. It divide the U.S. antitrust experience into five periods and discuss each period's legal trends and economic thinking in three core areas of antitrust: cartels, cooperation, or other interactions among independent firms; abusive conduct by dominant firms; and mergers.
Leniency policies offering immunity to the first cartel member that blows the whistle and self-reports to the antitrust authority have become the main instrument in the fight against cartels around the world. In public procurement markets, however, bid-rigging schemes are often accompanied by corruption of public officials. In the absence of coordinated forms of leniency for unveiling corruption, a policy offering immunity from antitrust sanctions may not be sufficient to encourage wrongdoers to blow the whistle, as the leniency recipient will then be exposed to the risk of conviction for corruption. Explicitly introducing leniency policies for corruption, as has been recently done in Brazil and Mexico, is only a first step. To increase the effectiveness of leniency in multiple offense cases, we suggest, besides extending automatic leniency to individual criminal sanctions, the creation of a ‘one-stop-point’ enabling firms and individuals to report different crimes simultaneously and receive leniency for all of them at once if they are entitled to it.
This presentation by Anna WU, Chief Executive, Chair, Competition Commission, Hong Kong, China was made during the discussion on "Promoting competition, protecting human rights" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 1 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/promoting-competition-protecting-human-rights.htm
Leniency policies offering immunity to the first cartel member that blows the whistle and self-reports to the antitrust authority have become the main instrument in the fight against cartels around the world. In public procurement markets, however, bid-rigging schemes are often accompanied by corruption of public officials. In the absence of coordinated forms of leniency for unveiling corruption, a policy offering immunity from antitrust sanctions may not be sufficient to encourage wrongdoers to blow the whistle, as the leniency recipient will then be exposed to the risk of conviction for corruption. Explicitly introducing leniency policies for corruption, as has been recently done in Brazil and Mexico, is only a first step. To increase the effectiveness of leniency in multiple offense cases, we suggest, besides extending automatic leniency to individual criminal sanctions, the creation of a ‘one-stop-point’ enabling firms and individuals to report different crimes simultaneously and receive leniency for all of them at once if they are entitled to it.
This presentation by Anna WU, Chief Executive, Chair, Competition Commission, Hong Kong, China was made during the discussion on "Promoting competition, protecting human rights" held at the 15th Global Forum on Competition on 1 December 2016. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/competition/globalforum/promoting-competition-protecting-human-rights.htm
Learn the basics of the Epson Moverio BT-200 from a developer's perspective. How it compares to the other AR/VR devices, application development possibilities and more:
Management briefing from Innovation Forum on the issues, responses by companies and emerging solutions to difficult issues in sustainable and ethical supply chains.
UNODC: Doing Business in Myanmar Without BriberyEthical Sector
On 16 March, the Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business (MCRB) and ASEAN CSR Network (ACN) hosted a workshop in Yangon for senior managers of Myanmar companies on anti-corruption practices.
http://www.myanmar-responsiblebusiness.org/news/combatting-corruption-in-myanmar.html
A wide ranging review of ESG issues in the extractive industries, though none dealt with by the authors in the depth needed to (literally) do the topics justice. Well worth a read nevertheless to get a perspective and a flavour of the themes involved.
Commercial and Economic Regulation
1
Economic context
Key terms and concepts
Key Players in Australia
Principles of Regulation
Self regulation?
This lecture
2
Australia is a developed country rich in natural resources :Mining and farming major exports
Major service industries: financial services, tourism, transport, communication and education
Major Trade partners: China, japan, Korea, US and UK
Increasingly shaped and influenced by golbal economy and reducing trade barriers
Economy
Australia has a mixed free enterprise economy and as Australia has joined the word economy it has significantly de-regulated a number of industries such as banking and aviation. Has moved faway from the idea of government as delivering primary services toa view that government is guide to policy similar to many Western democracies
3
As economy has grown markets have increasingly gone from predominantly state and regional to national ones
Has led to need to harmonize Australian laws in key areas e,g Australian Consumer law
Since 1970s has moved away from protectionism sought to promote a more competitive environment by allowing foreign entrants into market e.g aviation and banking
National economy
World is increasingly inter-connected and Australia is impacted by developments around the world
“globalisation”: trend towards crossing of national boundaries facilitated by internet, multi-national corporations, NGOs and mass media
Economic globalisation driven by WTO which in turn drives domestic policies
Impacts on regulatory responses e.g. legislation to respond to challenges of the internet, harmonised IP laws, privacy laws
Global context
Australian Senate : has made it difficult to move ahead on major reforms e.g Medicare co-payment
Government debt
Growth in sectors other than mining poor
High cost economy (particularly energy costs)
Need for more foreign investment
Management of scare resources :particularly water
Climate Change
More support for innovation, particularly small business
Strengthen Relationships with Trade Partners
Appropriate Regulation
Some Economic Challenges
Corporate entities are primary economic vehicle in Australia
Corporation:
separate legal entity recognised under legislation
Owned by shareholders
Managed by board who delegates responsibility usually to CEO
Economic operators
Are others: sole traders(individuals trading on own) and partnerships
7
Regulation may refer to:
legal rules imposed by government, the courts, regulators and industry
enacted law: legislation made by parliament and delegated legislation.
may also be more broadly defined as “Any rule endorsed by government where there is an expectation of compliance”.
The term “regulations” refers to specific legal rules or can refer specifically to provisions of delegated legislation or rules in respect of which the government expects compliance
What is regulation?
Various definitions
8
Regulators” bodies tasked by gove.
WHRF - Business and human rights: enhancing standards and ensuring redressFMDH
Présentation de Colette Tardif sur "Environnement et justice" lors du Forum Mondial des Droits de l'Homme, Novembre 2014.
Pour plus d'informations :
- Site web : http://fmdh-2014.org/fr/
- Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/FMDH2014
- Twitter : https://twitter.com/FMDH2014
- Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/user/FMDH2014
· Read the overview for Module 4· From the textbook, Internation.docxLynellBull52
· Read the overview for Module 4
· From the textbook, International business law and its environment, read the following chapters:
· National Lawmaking Powers and the Regulation of U.S. Trade
· GATT Law and the World Trade Organization: Basic Principles
· Law Governing Access to Foreign Markets
· From the Argosy University online library resources, read:
· Desai, M., Foley, C., & Hines Jr., J. (2004, December). Foreign direct investment in a world of multiple taxes.Journal of Public Economics, 88(12), 2727–2744. (LIRN Article A152498641)
· Gunter, H. (2006). Global expansion plans broaden horizons. Hotel & Motel Management, 221(18), 1–49. Retrieved from EBSCO database http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=22746846&site=ehost-live
· International growth. (2009). Franchising World, 41(2), 93. Retrieved from EBSCO databasehttp://libproxy.edmc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsh&AN=36530783&site=ehost-live
Growth in International Markets
Can managers afford to be conservative when taking decisions related to potential growth prospects?
After a company has successfully entered a foreign market, it may decide to continue to grow. Decisions to invest further can become easier to make based on the company’s experience in that market.
In early 2009, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC), Europe’s largest bank, announced that it was retreating from its expansion plans in the U.S. HSBC had recorded a $16 billion bad-debt loss in 2008. The loss was from an acquisition that initially cost the bank $14.8 billion. HSBC also had an additional $10 billion write-down on goodwill from its acquisition. The decision was primarily influenced by the eroding U.S. real estate market and a decline in the lending portfolio value of Household Financial, a six-year-old acquisition. Federal policies and regulations such as reduced interest rates, increased money supply, and Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) funds were contributing factors.
Raising capital, finding labor, and leveraging existing distribution channels all play a part in the decision to grow further. However, growth in international markets continues to be a challenge despite any circumstances.
Module 4 Overview (2 of 2)
Growth in International Markets
This module will cover the risks associated with growth in international markets.
You will compare the risks of further expansion in an existing market with the risks of expanding into a new market. In your assignment, you will also investigate economic incentives offered to companies that plan on investing. You will also look at the various regulatory issues companies need to take into account prior to further expansion.
CHAPTER 10: Laws Governing Access to Foreign Markets
Left to their own devices, the natural inclination of most nations is to protect their domestic industrial and agricultural base from foreign competition. National governments are easily tempted by t.
1. Complex supply chains that wind around the world can leave multinational
companies vulnerable to ties with firms linked to human-rights abuses,exposing
businesses and their leaders to an array of financial,regulatory,legislative,legal
and reputational risks.Publically disclosing policies and management systems that help
identify labor traffickers and violations, passing supply chain transparency legislation,
and establishing tough laws and penalties for human trafficking and slavery give supply
chain leaders direction in tackling this challenging issue. Proactive policies also will
help companies avoid costly supply chain disruptions.
Understanding and evaluating current anti-human-trafficking compliance regulations is
essential,as well as designing policies and programs to monitor the practices of suppliers
throughout the global supply chain.While most companies have systems in place for
internal operations,it’s also imperative that they incorporate policies to ensure compli-
ance with new, modified human-rights-related legislation.
A Coordinated, Global Effort
The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that globally there are 21 million
people in forced labor, which is nearly equal to the country populations of Australia,
Madagascar orTaiwan.Not surprisingly,11.4 million of these individuals are women and
girls who are trapped by labor recruiters,contractors and employers in manufacturing,
construction, agriculture, entertainment and domestic work.
Preventing Human
Rights-Related Risks in
Global Supply Chains
Exclusively for Supply Leaders in the ISM Corporate Program Vol. 5:2 April 2015
Insights for Today’s Supply Leaders
ISM Forward Scan
By Adriana Sanford, J.D., Dual LL.M., and Bruce Zagaris
2. The eradication of human-rights-related abuses requires
a global coordinated effort across governments and law
enforcement to combat the use of violence,debt bondage
or other forms of coercion that force people to work
against their will. Failure to adequately manage these
risks can dramatically effect multinational companies,
shareholders and communities.
In the past several years,the U.S.government has supported
legislation and policies that address global human-rights
issues in the supply chain.InAugust 2012,the U.S.Security
and Exchange Commissions (SEC) issued its final rule on
conflict minerals pursuant to Dodd-Frank Section 1502.
The rule described the assessment and reporting require-
ments for issuers — any legal entity that develops,registers
and sells securities for the purpose of financing its opera-
tions — whose products contain conflict minerals.It’s esti-
mated at least half of all SEC issuers were affected by the
rule because conflict minerals (tin,tantalum,tungsten and
gold) are used in a wide range of products across numerous
industries,including automotive,aerospace and defense.
Also, on September 25, 2012, President Barack Obama
issued an executive order strengthening protections in
federal contracts against human trafficking.As the largest
single purchaser of goods and services in the world, the
U.S.government understands its responsibility to combat
human trafficking at home and abroad, as well as ensure
that U.S. tax dollars do not contribute to the problem.
The order directs the Federal Acquisition Regulatory
(FAR) Council, working with the appropriate agencies,
to amend federal contracting regulations to:
• Prohibit federal contractors, subcontractors
and their employees from engaging in certain
trafficking-related practices, such as misleading
or fraudulent recruitment practices, charging
employees’ recruitment fees and destroying or
confiscating employee’s identity documents.
• Apply new, customized compliance measures for
work exceeding US$500,000 that is performed
abroad, requiring federal contractors and subcon-
tractors to have compliance plans appropriate for
the nature and scope of the activities performed.
• Set up a process to identify industries and sectors
that have a history of human trafficking in order
to strengthen compliance on domestic contracts.
International Initiatives
Of course, supply chain leaders also need to be aware
of regulations addressing human trafficking and conflict
minerals across the globe. In March 2014, the European
Commission proposed a regulation establishing an EU
system of self-certification for importers of conflict min-
erals that choose to import responsibly into the Euro-
pean Union.After hearings late last year, the regulation
is expected to be adopted.
Self-certification requires EU importers of conflict metals
and their ores to exercise due diligence — avoid causing
harm on the ground — by monitoring and administering
their purchases and sales in line with the five steps of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop-
ment (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance.
The regulation offers EU importers an opportunity to
strengthen existing efforts to ensure clean supply chains
when trading legitimately with operators in conflict-
affected countries.To strengthen public accountability of
smelters and refiners, increase supply chain transparency
and facilitate responsible mineral sourcing, the EU plans
to publish an annual list of EU and global responsible
smelters and refiners.
The EU initiative proposes various incentives supporting
the regulation to encourage supply chain due diligence
by EU companies. Some of the incentives include:
• Public procurement incentives for companies
selling products such as mobile phones, printers,
and computers containing tin, tantalum, tungsten
and gold
• Financial support for small and middle-market
enterprises to carry out due diligence and for the
OECD to develop outreach activities
• Recognition for EU companies that source respon-
sibly from conflict-affected countries or areas
• Policy dialogues and diplomat outreach with gov-
ernments in extraction, processing and consuming
countries to encourage broader due diligence.
The EU proposal came about after public hearings, an
impact assessment and extensive consultations with the
OECD, businesses and institutions in producer coun-
tries.The G20 also has called for better regulation in the
sourcing of conflict minerals.
The Modern Slavery Bill reflects the UK government’s
determination to lead in the global fight against modern slavery.
3. The Fight Against Modern Slavery
Last year, both the U.S. and UK governments proposed
new legislation to eradicate forced labor, modern day
slavery and human trafficking.The Modern Slavery Bill
reflects the UK government’s determination to lead in
the global fight against modern slavery.It provides a basic
framework other governments can follow and is the first
of its kind in Europe to specifically address this problem
in the 21st century.
The bill proposes tougher sentences for traffickers and
their accomplices. Under the measures, penalties for
slavery, servitude, forced labor and human trafficking
range from 14 years to life.Those previously convicted
of a serious violent offence will automatically receive a
life sentence.The legislation would also create an inde-
pendent anti-slavery commissioner and contain specific
provisions for seizing traffickers’ assets and channeling a
portion to victims.
There also are discussions as to whether the bill should
include legislation governing transparency in supply
chains. Such laws could further effect and significantly
disrupt organized criminal gangs and terrorist groups that
may fall under the radar.
Recent proposed U.S.legislation reflects the broader trend
toward regulated supply chain transparency.The federal
legislation,H.R.4842,would require U.S.companies with
annual worldwide gross receipts exceeding $100 million
to disclose to the SEC their efforts to identify and address
specific human rights-related risks in their supply chains.
The legislation requires public disclosure of auditing and
verification procedures, risk assessments, training, reme-
diation plans and accountability mechanisms that address
trafficking and slavery risks.
In addition to retailers and manufacturers,publicly traded
or private companies that meet the annual gross receipts
threshold and are currently required to submit annual
reports to the SEC would be required to file reports
regarding forced labor,slavery,human trafficking and child
labor throughout their supply chains.
Among other requirements, the legislation also proposes
that the U.S. Secretary of Labor, in consultation with
the U.S. Secretary of State, other appropriate federal and
international agencies, independent labor evaluators and
human rights groups,publish a“Top 100”list of companies
that comply with supply chain labor standards and adhere
to the relevant federal and international guidelines.
A Complex Global Problem
Human-rights-related risks in the global supply chain are
an exceptionally complex problem.There is widespread
acknowledgment of the importance of supply chain over-
sight to ensure corporations are not unwittingly com-
plicit in human-rights violations.Also,investors need more
information to adequately evaluate human-rights-related
risks within their portfolios that can adversely effect share-
holder value. Federal legislation is necessary to provide
consumers’ information on which products have been
tainted and better identify companies that are eradicating
human-rights violations within their global supply chain.
Many of the current bills are primarily enforcement-based.
To be effective, proposed legislation must also include
proper protection for victims and their families,otherwise
it’s unlikely to make a difference. Human trafficking and
slavery thrive in countries where victim protection and
victims’rights are weak.More than one-quarter of all vic-
tims of forced labor around the world are children,which
is more than 5 million children. Children as young as 5
years of age have been trafficked and sold.The prevention
and punishment of traffickers requires victims and their
families to cooperate with the prosecution,which is essen-
tial to understanding the complexity of the problems and
its challenges.But there also must be adequate legislation
to sufficiently protect these individuals from further harm.
Legislation is only part of the solution. Our society as a
whole needs to be engaged, as there is a high correlation
between the crime of slavery and other crimes. Human
trafficking and human-rights-related crimes provide a sig-
nificant source of income for organized crime groups and
terrorists organizations — it’s the second-largest source
of profits for international organized crime behind drugs.
According to the ILO,forced labor in the private economy
generates $150 billion in illegal profits per year.As the
preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
appropriately states,“Recognition of the inherent dignity
and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of
the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice
and peace in the world.”
Adriana Sanford, J.D., Dual LL.M. is Arizona State Uni-
versity’s Lincoln Professor of Global Corporate Compliance
and Ethics and a clinical associate professor of management
(specializing in law and ethical leadership for managers) at
W. P. Carey School of Business in Tempe, Arizona. She is a
renowned corporate lawyer on matters of international and
comparative law. Sanford provides instruction to more than
1,200 ASU graduate and undergraduate students each year.
She is dual citizen of Chile and the United States and fluent
in Spanish, Portuguese, English and French. Bruce Zagaris
is a partner with Berliner Corcoran Rowe LLP in Wash-
ington, D.C. He is a founder and editor of the International
Enforcement Law Reporter (www.ielr.com) and an author
of International White Collar Crime: Cases and Materials.