This document outlines the key requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard regulations. It discusses common causes of laboratory accidents like inadequate training and safety protocols. It summarizes statistics on laboratory accidents and fatalities. It also reviews several high-profile laboratory accident cases and the systemic deficiencies that led to the incidents. The document explains the hierarchy of hazard controls and the "Swiss cheese" model for managing risk. Finally, it details the main sections of the OSHA Lab Standard, including requirements for chemical hygiene plans, personal protective equipment, employee training, medical consultations, and recordkeeping.
Risk Assessment Process / Tools and Techniques Yasser Ramadan
Part 1 from lecture Risk assessment process and tools/techniques.
Meaning of risk assessment.
General classification of risk assessment types.
Appropriate Techniques for Risk Assessment Life Cycle
Factors Affecting Selection of Risk Assessment Techniques
Classification of risk Assessment techniques.
Applicability of techniques to different phases of a project.
Risk Assessment Steps
What is Hazard?
What is Hazard Identification?
Categorizes of Hazards.
Where can we found data of hazards?
When should hazard identification be done?
Laboratory safety is dependent on a collaboration between safety personnel and the laboratory personnel conducting the research and sample analysis. It is important to understand the hazards and risk to determine the heirarchy of controls. In caertain instances, use of personal protective clothing and equipment may be best option to protect the worker from harm. This seminar presents the issues that are pertinent for safety professionals to consider when inspecting any laboratory and understanding the chemical process and equipment used in the analysis.
the occupational exposure limit (OEL) represents the maximum airborne concentration of a toxic substance to which a worker can be exposed over a period of time without suffering any harmful consequences.
Risk Assessment Process / Tools and Techniques Yasser Ramadan
Part 1 from lecture Risk assessment process and tools/techniques.
Meaning of risk assessment.
General classification of risk assessment types.
Appropriate Techniques for Risk Assessment Life Cycle
Factors Affecting Selection of Risk Assessment Techniques
Classification of risk Assessment techniques.
Applicability of techniques to different phases of a project.
Risk Assessment Steps
What is Hazard?
What is Hazard Identification?
Categorizes of Hazards.
Where can we found data of hazards?
When should hazard identification be done?
Laboratory safety is dependent on a collaboration between safety personnel and the laboratory personnel conducting the research and sample analysis. It is important to understand the hazards and risk to determine the heirarchy of controls. In caertain instances, use of personal protective clothing and equipment may be best option to protect the worker from harm. This seminar presents the issues that are pertinent for safety professionals to consider when inspecting any laboratory and understanding the chemical process and equipment used in the analysis.
the occupational exposure limit (OEL) represents the maximum airborne concentration of a toxic substance to which a worker can be exposed over a period of time without suffering any harmful consequences.
This presentation addresses vivarium risk assessments for chemical and biological exposures in a research setting. Committee approval processes (IBC, IACUC, etc), controlling banding application, OEL development/validation, and IH monitoring results and control measures are just some of the topics presented.
Wayne State University Laboratory Safety TrainingElena Fracassa
This training addresses basic laboratory safety issues for WSU labs and is required annually for all laboratory faculty, staff, and students working with hazardous chemicals.
Topics covered:
Contents of the OSHA Lab Standard (29 CFR 1910.1450)
WSU Chemical Hygiene Plan
Physical and health hazards of chemicals
Safety equipment in the laboratory
Safe handling and storage of chemicals
Hazard Communication & Global Harmonization System of Classifying & Labeling Chemicals
Safety Data Sheets
Personal Protective Equipment
Explanation of EPA, MDEQ, and DOT regulations
Explanation of the WSU Emergency Contingency Plan
Lab responsibilities as a hazardous waste generators
Definitions of hazardous waste
Procedures for collection, labeling, storage and removal of waste
Responding to injuries, spills, fires, and other emergencies in the lab
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
More Related Content
Similar to Is It Safe? A Cautionary Tale and Practical Guide to Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations
This presentation addresses vivarium risk assessments for chemical and biological exposures in a research setting. Committee approval processes (IBC, IACUC, etc), controlling banding application, OEL development/validation, and IH monitoring results and control measures are just some of the topics presented.
Wayne State University Laboratory Safety TrainingElena Fracassa
This training addresses basic laboratory safety issues for WSU labs and is required annually for all laboratory faculty, staff, and students working with hazardous chemicals.
Topics covered:
Contents of the OSHA Lab Standard (29 CFR 1910.1450)
WSU Chemical Hygiene Plan
Physical and health hazards of chemicals
Safety equipment in the laboratory
Safe handling and storage of chemicals
Hazard Communication & Global Harmonization System of Classifying & Labeling Chemicals
Safety Data Sheets
Personal Protective Equipment
Explanation of EPA, MDEQ, and DOT regulations
Explanation of the WSU Emergency Contingency Plan
Lab responsibilities as a hazardous waste generators
Definitions of hazardous waste
Procedures for collection, labeling, storage and removal of waste
Responding to injuries, spills, fires, and other emergencies in the lab
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptxRASHMI M G
Plant breeding for disease resistance is a strategy to reduce crop losses caused by disease. Plants have an innate immune system that allows them to recognize pathogens and provide resistance. However, breeding for long-lasting resistance often involves combining multiple resistance genes
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...University of Maribor
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intelligent Systems.
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Is It Safe? A Cautionary Tale and Practical Guide to Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations
1. Is It Safe?
A Cautionary Tale and Practical Guide to Laboratory Safety and
Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations
Speaker :
Dr. Gregory J. Wells, MS, PhD
Sr. Scientist and Chemistry Consultant
The Cecon Group, Inc
2. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 2
Like Life in General
Chemistry Can Get Messy
Entropy happens!
3. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 3
Especially In Today’s Hyper-driven World
4. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 4
We sometimes get so immersed in work or play…
…we can end up in a tight
spot before we know it.
5. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 5
Experience and Expertise Count
But past performance is no
guarantee of future results
6. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 6
And Things Don’t Always Turn Out As Planned
7. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 7
Despite All the Warnings Around Us…
… laboratory accidents, injuries and even death
are still too common in industry and academia.
8. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 8
Workplace Metrics
About 7,200 OSHA recordable* accidents in research laboratories in 2013**
• About 1 of every 70 lab workers.
• Nearly half of the accidents resulted in days away from work or restricted work duties.
• About 300 deaths attributed to exposure to harmful substances or environments
* Staff injuries requiring more than simple first
aid and attributable to the workplace
** Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
9. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 9
Tragedy at UCLA
What happened
Why it happened
• In late 2008, 23-year-old research assistant Sheharbano
Sangji sustained third degree burns over 40% of her body as
the result of a lab fire at UCLA. She died of her injuries 18
days later.
• Ms. Sangii was inexperienced and not properly trained in the
use and handling of t-Butyllithium solution, an extremely
pyrophoric liquid. She was also not wearing proper PPE.
Proper dispensing
technique for t-BuLi
10. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 10
Explosion at Texas Tech University
• In January, 2010, an explosion lead to a graduate student
losing three fingers, a perforated eye and significant
burns.
What happened
Why it happened
• Violated lab rule limiting preparation of high energy
compounds to 100mg or less.
• The student prepared a 10g batch, about half of which
exploded while being ground with a mortar and pestle. Ni(N2H4)2(ClO4)2
11. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 11
Fatal Poisoning at Dartmouth College
What happened
Why it happened
• In August, 1996, an experienced research professor, Dr. Karen
Wetterhahm, spilled a drop or two of Me2Hg onto her latex gloves
while transferring by pipette.
• About 5 months later, she developed severe CNS symptoms, lapsed
into a coma 3 weeks later, and died on June 8, 1997, less than a year
after the initial exposure.
• Ignorance of the extreme toxicity (IDLH level) of Me2Hg
• Inaccurate PPE recommended (latex gloves) in manufacturer’s MSDS
12. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 12
Seeing the Bigger Picture
• Inaccurate knowledge – failure to fully appreciate the intrinsic hazards
• Failure to follow – SOPs (if any) or over-reliance on standardized H&S
documents (e.g. “boiler plate” MSDS); missing or inadequate use of PPE
• Cavalier or naive attitude – from inadequate training, poor supervision,
or prior “non-events”
Reveals common threads to these tragic events
often thematic to lab accidents in general
• SYSTEMIC DEFICIENCIES – in training, communication, management
“Experimenting with Danger” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALBWxGik64A
CSB Accident Review Video
13. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 13
Culture and Attitude
"It's very difficult to change PI’s attitudes. All too often, researchers in laboratories around the
country still work alone and without proper supervision or protection.”
James Gibson, UCLA's director of EH&S.
"In many cases, academic freedom is more important than safety.“
Jim Kaufman, president, Laboratory Safety Institute
14. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 14
Tracking an initial theoretical investment of $10,000 in publicly traded companies from the mid-90s
to 2012, researchers found that award-winning (CHAA) companies outperformed the S&P 500.
Health and Safety Investments Pay Dividends
“Companies that build a culture of health by focusing on the well-being and safety of their workforce may yield
greater value for their investors.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (JOEM, Sept.’13)
CHAA vs. S&P 500 Performance Comparison 1999-2012
15. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 15
Notable Federal workplace milestones
1893 – Safety Appliance Act
o First federal statute to require safety equipment in the workplace (railroad equipment only)
1910 – Congress establishes the United States Bureau of Mines
o Conducts safety research but has no regulatory authority
o Many states also enact worker’s compensation laws which discouraged unsafe workplaces
1968 – LBJ submits a comprehensive occupational health and safety bill to Congress.
o Opposed by many business groups and even labor leadership, the bill dies in committee
1970 – Occupational Safety and Health Act
o Enacted by Congress and signed into law on December 29 (Nixon)
Before OSHA – federal mandates to ensure workplace health and safety were minimal
or non-existent.
16. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 16
Established – 1971 as an agency of the USDL following passage of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act signed into law on December 29, 1970.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
“To assure safe and healthful working conditions
for working men and women; by authorizing
enforcement of the standards developed under
the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in
their efforts to assure safe and healthful working
conditions; by providing for research, information,
education, and training in the field of occupational
safety and health.”
Mission
17. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 17
Authority – establish and enforce workplace regulations based on
guidelines set by certain standards organizations (e.g. ACGIH)
Equates to about one (1) compliance officer for
every 56,000 workers and nearly 3,500 worksites!
Ultimate responsibility is on YOU!
Employees – 2,305 (2012)
Annual Budget – $565M (FY 2015)
Responsibility – for 130 million workers at more than 8 million worksites
18. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 18
The OSHA Lab Standard
29 CFR 1910.1450
50 Total
#29 – Department of Labor
Part of the Code of Federal Regulations
Part.Subpart
1910 – Occ. Safety and Health Standards
1450 – Occupational exposure to hazardous
chemicals in laboratories
Requirements – parts (a) – (l)
Title
19. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 19
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(a) Scope and Application (p 3327)
• All non-production laboratories
• “Lab scale” operations (small quant.)
• More than 500K lab workers
(b) Definitions
• Chemical Hygiene Officer – “…an employee who is designated by the employer and who is
qualified by training or experience to provide technical guidance
in the development and implementation of the provisions of the
Chemical Hygiene Plan” - 29 CFR 1910.1450(b)
• Chemical Hygiene Plan – “…written program developed and implemented by the employer
which sets forth procedures, equipment, PPE and work practices
that (i) are capable of protecting employees from the health
hazards presented by hazardous chemicals used in that
workplace and (ii) meets the requirements of paragraph (e) of this
section.” - 29 CFR 1910.1450(b)
20. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 20
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(c) Permissible Exposure Limits (p 3329)
• Do not exceed PELs (see Subpart Z)
• Exposure Limits
OSHA – PELs: TWA (8h day), STEL (15min), Ceiling (0 Time)
ACGIH – TLVs (Threshold Limit Value)
NIOSH – RELs (Recommended Exposure Limit)
• IDLH (Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health) – 30 min limit
3M Respirator Selection Guide – free online
21. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 21
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(d) Employee Exposure Determination
• Initial Monitoring
• Periodic Monitoring
• Termination of Monitoring
• Notification of Employee
“The employer shall measure the employee’s
exposure to any substance regulated by a
standard which requires monitoring if there is
reason to believe that exposure levels for that
substance routinely exceed the action level (or
in the absence of an action level, the PEL).”
- Federal Register (Pg. 3329)
22. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 22
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
Subpart Z – Compounds with an OSHA Standard Requiring Monitoring
450 regulated standards, but only the following require monitoring:
• Acrylonitrile
• Arsenic (inorganic)
• Asbestos
• Benzene
• Cadmium
• 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
• Chromium (VI)
• Ethylene oxide
• Formaldehyde
• Lead
• Methylene chloride
• Vinyl chloride
23. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 23
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(e) Chemical Hygiene Plan
General information (p. 3329)
• Written CHP
• Accessible to Employees
• Elements and Specific Measures
• Review and Evaluate (at least) Annually
24. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab
Standard Regulations
24
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
• Elements and Specific Measures of the CHP
1. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
2. Control Measures (Determination / Implementation)
o Elimination; Substitution; Eng. and Admin. Controls; PPE/Training
3. Fume Hoods and other protective equip. (Function properly; maintenance, inspection)
4. Info and Training Provisions (Sect. f)
25. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 25
Hierarchy of Controls
26. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 26
“Swiss Cheese” Model of Managing Risk
Multiple Barriers
Infrastructure/Engineering
Technology/Processes (SOPs)
Training/Supervision
PPE
Active Errors
Worker initiated
Lack of supervision / training
Admin. / Engineering / Maintenance
Latent weaknesses
Adapted from “Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents”, James Reason (1997)
Designed
to avoid…
27. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 27
• Slices represent different safety levels or controls designed to prevent incidents
• Holes represent gaps in levels; incidents can occur when holes in various levels “line up”.
• Effectiveness of these controls should be regularly measured and documented to
minimize risk and repair holes when possible
• Concrete, objective indicators that can't be gamed (e.g. chemical inventory and
storage; waste streams; regular lab inspections; housekeeping; # incidents/time;
near misses).
• Training records
• Maintenance records
• Requires relationship between management and staff
• Continuous vigilance (there’s always a “mouse”)
Swiss Cheese Model (cont.)
28. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 28
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
• Elements and Specific Measures of the CHP (cont.)
5. Circumstances requiring prior approval
6. Provisions for Medical Consultations and Examinations (Sect. g)
7. Description of Responsible Personnel (designate who is resp. for enforcement)
8. Provisions for Additional Protection with Particularly Hazardous Substances (PHS)
(Area for use; Fume Hood; Decontamination; Disposal)
PHS classes include
29. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 29
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
Particularly Hazardous Substances (PHS)
• Select Carcinogens
• Reproductive Toxins
• Highly Toxic Substances
Also Suggested
• Highly Reactive
• Highly Corrosive
• Highly Flammable or Pyrophoric
30. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 30
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(f) Information and Training
• Employer Must Provide Workplace Hazard Information
• Condition of Initial Employment and New Exposure Situations
• All Relevant Information – provided and readily available anytime
• Relevant, Periodic Training
31. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 31
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
Information Requirements
• Contents of Lab Standard and Appendices
• Location and Availability of the CHP
• PELs, TLVs, etc.
• Signs and Symptoms of Exposure
• Location and Availability of References (e.g. MSDS, SOP, CHP)
32. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 32
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
Training Elements Required
• Methods and Observations to Detect Presence or Release of Hazardous Chemicals
• Physical and Chemical Health Hazards
• Protection & Emergency Procedures
• Training in details of the Employer’s Chemical Hygiene Plan (CHP)
33. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 33
Recommended precautions when PHS in use
• Designated Area and signage
• Need for Fume Hood
• Appropriate PPE
• Procedures for Decontamination
• Proper Waste Disposal
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
34. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 34
(g) Medical Consultation and Examination (p. 3330)
• Employer Provided Medical Attention and Follow-up Exams
• Provided by Licensed Physician
• All Relevant Information Provided to Physician
• Physician’s Written Opinion
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
35. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 35
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(h) Hazard Identification (p. 3330)
Labels and MSDSs
• Labels Not Removed or Destroyed on Incoming Containers (bar codes must not obstruct
existing labels)
• Maintain and Make Available MSDSs – Hard Copies / Network Database
Chemical(s) Developed in Lab (i.e. non-Commercial)
• In Lab – Provide Training (as per part f)
• Outside Lab – Hazard Communication Standards
Shipping novel chemicals of unknown hazard requires creating an MSDS for that
chemical and following the provisions of the Federal Hazard Communication
Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
36. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 36
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(i) Respirators (p 3330)
• Provided by the Employer
• Training in proper selection and usage (as per 1910.134)
OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1)
requires that the wearer of any tight-fitting respirator be fit tested.
M-95 dust respirator Half-face cartridge Full-face SCBA
37. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 37
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(j) Recordkeeping (p. 3330)
• Employee Exposure Monitoring
• Medical Consultations
• Medical Examinations
• Written Opinions and Tests
• Retain, Transmit and Make Available as Needed (1910.1020)
o Duration of Employment plus 30 years
38. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 38
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
(k) Dates (p. 3330)
• Effective May 1, 1990 (original Haz. Comm. Std.)
• Develop and Implement CHP before January 31, 1991
• Section k now reserved and left blank for future use
(l) Appendices
• Recommendations and references (non-mandatory)
A. NRC Recommendations (p. 3330)
Based on "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and
Management of Chemical Hazards.“ (Nat. Acad. Press)
B. References (p. 3335)
Includes “Laboratory Safety Guidelines” from the Lab Safety Institute
39. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 39
Requirements of the OSHA Lab Standard
“Laboratory Safety Guidelines” (Appendix B)
1. What are the hazards?
Suggests Four Basic Questions Before Proceeding
2. What are the worst things that could happen?
3. What do I need to do to be prepared?
4. What are the prudent practices, protective facilities and protective
equipment (PPE) needed to minimize the risks and consequences?
40. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 40
Programs like TAKE TWO... for Safety™, developed
by DuPont, stimulates thinking and conversation
about safety in the workplace and at home.
“TAKE TWO” means that a person can work more
safely by taking two minutes to think through a job
before that job is started.
Established OSHA and Industry Standards
give us proven tools to work safely and efficiently
Be Proactive, Not Reactive!
41. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 41
Updates to OSHA’s Recordkeeping and Reporting Rule
The rule expands the list of severe work-related injuries and
illnesses that all covered employers must report to OSHA.
Starting January 1, 2015, employers must report the
following to OSHA:
• All work-related fatalities within 8 hours (same as current
requirement)
• All work-related in-patient hospitalizations, amputations, or loss of an
eye of one or more employees within 24 hours
42. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab
Standard Regulations
42
Updates to OSHA’s Recordkeeping and Reporting Rule
Summary of What, When and How to Comply
43. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 43
References
OSHA website www.osha.gov
Lab Standard, Fact Sheet http://1.usa.gov/1A7avGp
Lab Standard, Full documentation http://1.usa.gov/1Ee5ZEw
"Prudent Practices in the Laboratory” http://bit.ly/1t09Lzu
Chemical SOP and SOP templates http://www.safety.duke.edu/OHS/chemsopsTemplates.htm
List of PHS (Duke Univ.) www.safety.duke.edu/ohs/phs.htm
NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/
Ansell Chemical Resistance Glove Guide http://bit.ly/1Ab6wZc
3M Respirator Selection Guide http://bit.ly/1yUDngw
Chemical Safety Board (CSB) http://www.csb.gov/
The Laboratory Safety Institute http://labsafetyinstitute.org/
44. Thank You
Please feel free to contact us at:
Phone : 1-646-216-8860
Email : marketing@biopractice.com
45. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 45
Supplemental Slides
46. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 46
Accident Investigation and Mitigation
1. Notification and Response
• If it’s not widely communicated, it never “happened”. Expect more of the same.
2. Site Investigation and Interviews
• Timely, quality data collection at the source is essential to effectively address the problem.
3. Root Cause Analysis (RCA or similar analysis technique)
• Asking the right “whys” can reveal the source of the accident and prevent more of the same.
47. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 47
4. Review and Report of Findings
• Accurate, timely review is the first step to communication and implementation of corrective action.
5. Implement Corrective Measures
• Scope – Resources – Outcome – Metrics
6. Monitoring
• Ensures corrective measures implemented (engineering and/or administrative controls)
• Process-oriented (e.g. training)
• Results-oriented (e.g. lab inspections)
Accident investigation and mitigation
48. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 48
Establishing a PPE Program
Identify steps taken to assess potential hazards in every employee’s work space
and in workplace operating procedures
Identify appropriate PPE selection criteria
Identify how you will train employees on the use of PPE, including
• What PPE is necessary
• When PPE is necessary
• How to properly inspect PPE for wear or damage
• How to properly put on (don) and adjust the fit of PPE
• How to properly take off (doff) PPE
• The limitations of PPE
• How to properly care for and store PPE
Identify how you will assess employee understanding of PPE training
Identify how you will enforce proper PPE use
Identify how you will provide for any required medical examinations
Identify how and when to evaluate the PPE program
49. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 49
Appropriate PPE depends on the activity, recognized hazards and materials in use
• Eyes,
• Face,
• Head,
• Ears,
• Feet,
• Hands, arms, whole body
PPE is designed to protect:
• Goggles,
• Face shields,
• Safety glasses,
• Hard hats,
• Safety shoes,
• Gloves,
• Vests,
• Earplugs or Earmuffs
Includes items such as:
50. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 50
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Established – Dec. 2, 1970 by executive order (Nixon) and later ratified by Congress, which reorganized and
consolidated many federal governmental environmental responsibilities under one agency
Mission – protecting human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on
laws passed by Congress
Responsibility – maintaining and enforcing national standards under a variety of environmental laws, in
consultation with state, tribal, and local governments.
Headquarters – Washington, D.C.
- 10 regional offices and 27 laboratories conducting environmental assessment, research and education
Employees – 17,359 FTE (2011)
- Many more on contractual basis.
- More than half are engineers, scientists and environmental specialists
- Others include legal, public affairs, financial and information technologists
Annual Budget - $8.2 billion (2014)
51. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 51
Administrative regions of the EPA
52. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 52
Notable EPA Legislation
1970: Water Quality Improvement Act
1974: Safe Drinking Water Act
1976: Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
1977: Clean Water Act
1987: Water Quality Act
1969: National Environmental Policy Act
1970: Wilderness Act
1977: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
1980: Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
1994: California Desert Protection Act
Land
1955: Air Pollution Control Act
1963: Clean Air Act
1965: Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control Act
1969: National Environmental Policy Act
1976: Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
1990: Clean Air Act Amendments
Air
Water
53. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 53
Notable EPA legislation – Hazardous Waste
1965: Solid Waste Disposal Act
1969: National Environmental Policy Act
1970: Resource Recovery Act
1976: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
1980: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("Superfund")
1982: Nuclear Waste Repository Act
1984: Hazardous and Solid Wastes Amendments Act
1986: Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
2002: Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act ("Brownfields Law")
54. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 54
Notable EPA legislation
1969: National Environmental Policy Act
1970: Wilderness Act
1977: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
1980: Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
1994: California Desert Protection Act
Land Usage
55. Laboratory Safety and Compliance with the OSHA Lab Standard Regulations 55
Acknowledgements
• https://www.osha.gov/history/OSHA_HISTORY_3360s.pdf
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_Safety_and_Health_Act#cite_ref AllAbout_18-0
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency
• http://www2.dupont.com/Media_Center/en_AU/assets/downloads/events/TakeTwo_Fact_Sheet.pdf
• www.public.navy.mil/navsafecen
• http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2011/October/24101101.asp
• http://www.exiledtees.com
• http://oddstuffmagazine.com/10-wtf-moments-of-the-day-may-31st-2012.html/attachment/45813
• www.change.org
• http://safetyposter.com/ppe-alberta-compliance-poster-ab-01/
Editor's Notes
Easy to drop your guard down and let safety take a back seat.
Health and safety experts say that they have not seen a significant shift in the behavior of bench scientists or the attitudes of lab heads, who are in the best position to improve safety culture. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110418/full/472270a.html
Ref. http://www.labmanager.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37499/title/Study-Suggests-Companies-with-a--Culture-of-Health--May-Outperform-Others-in-the-Marketplace/
JOEM is official publication of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).
CHAA = Corporate Health Achievement Award, presented by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM)
In effect for nearly 25 years (Jan. 1990).
Standard originally applied only to private sector, until Pres. Signed an Exec. Order extending it to public sector.
Regulation allowed for states to submit their own plan for approval; about 25 State plan states presently (must apply to public sector).
Does not apply to QC or other non-research labs.
CHO is not an enforcement position, but is more of an advisory role.
TWA - Time Weighted Avg.; STEL – Short Term Exposure Limit
Limits may vary depending on the agency; eg. formaldehyde – OSHA TWA = 0.75ppm, STEL = 2ppm; ACGIH TLV = 0.3ppm Ceiling; NIOSH TWA = 0.016ppm.
Responsible employers usually aim for the lowest of all three groups, but must at least comply with OSHA (if avail.). OSHA enforces other rec. levels if they don’t have one. This is part of the General Duty Clause of the OSHA Act (called 5A1).
Action level is typically half the PEL; “Actions” called for include warning signs, training, container labels.
Eg. confining substance to fume hood during use at all times removes need for monitoring.
DuPont Deepwater site – Pb monitors and routine blood testing during TEA production years.
Suggest review and evaluation be done on a rotating basis among staff (active participation, culture).
Specific commitments to training schedule communicated.
Recommended: Duke University PHS list online (25pp).
Good ref: Prudent Practices in the Laboratory (Nat. Acad. Press) – free online; hard copy for ~$100.
Confidentiality (HIPPA) rules apply.
3M Respirator Selection Guide online
Includes MSDS used.
http://www2.dupont.com/Media_Center/en_AU/assets/downloads/events/TakeTwo_Fact_Sheet.pdf
TAKE is an acronym which stands for:
T= Talk: Have I talked with everyone involved with this job?
A= Action: Do I know the proper actions I need to follow to do this job safely?
K= Knowledge: Do I have the proper knowledge to do this job safely?
E= Equipment: Do I have the proper equipment, including the proper personal protective equipment, to do this job safely?
Previously, employers were required to report all workplace fatalities and when three or more workers were hospitalized in the same incident. The updated reporting requirements have a life-saving purpose: they will enable employers and workers to prevent future injuries by identifying and eliminating the most serious workplace hazards. (Feb. 2, 2015, OSHA Newsletter osha.news@subscriptions.dol.gov).