Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byRoel Palmaers
Ipv6 evolution
IPv6 adoption has been slow due to a lack of compelling business reasons for network operators and developers to transition. While IPv4 address exhaustion is a technical problem, NAT solutions have worked well enough and IPv6 does not offer clear revenue opportunities. For widespread IPv6 adoption to occur, the technology needs to enable new applications and business models that drive large-scale infrastructure upgrades, similar to how IPv4 fueled the Internet boom of the 1990s. Only a "revolution" sparked by the next generation of Internet-connected devices and services will provide the motivation for a full transition away from IPv4.
Ipv6 evolution
- 1. 1 Internet Evolution andIPv6 Paul Wilson APNIC
- 2. 2 Overview • Where isIPv6 today? – Address space deployment – Compared with IPv4 • Do we actually need IPv6? – If so, why and when? – Are there any alternatives? • How will it happen? – Evolution – Revolution • The opportunity of IPv6
- 3. 3 Where is IPv6today? Address space deployment
- 4. 4 IPv6 – Globalallocations by RIR RIPENCC 27483 61% AFRINIC 12 0% APNIC 17867 39% ARIN 198 0% LACNIC 73 0%
- 5. 5 IPv6 – Globalallocations by CC Other 603 1% NO 268 1% PL 2069 5% NL 561 1% US 168 0% EU 6154 13% JP 7269 16% FR 8225 18% DE 9820 22% KR 4145 9% AU 4107 9%TW 2243 5%
- 6. 6 IPv6 – Globalallocation growth 0 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AFRINIC APNIC ARIN LACNIC RIPENCC
- 7. 7 Where is IPv6today? Comparison with IPv4
- 8. 8 IPv6 – theBGP view
- 9. 9 IPv4 – theBGP view
- 10. 10 IPv6 – ASCount
- 11. 11 IPv4 – ASCount
- 12.
- 13. 13 Where is theIndustry? • Post-bust conservatism… – Optimism is no substitute for knowledge, capability and performance! • Industry consolidation replaces explosive expansionist growth – Investment programs must show assured returns, across their entire life cycles – Reduced investment risk means reduced innovation and experimentation • Reducing emphasis on brand new services – …and more on returns from existing infrastructure investments (value-adding, bundling etc)
- 14. 14 Do we needIPv6?
- 15. 15 The (IPv4) InternetToday • According to some: We “ran out” of IPv4 addresses a long time ago – …when NAT deployment started in earnest. – In today’s retail market one public IPv4 address can cost as much as Mbit DSL • Applications are now engineered for NAT – Client-initiated transactions – Application-layer identities – Server agents for multi-party rendezvous – Multi-party shared NAT state • Ever increasing complexity, cost and performance penalty
- 16. 16 The NAT problem 10.0.0.1..2 ..3 ..4 R 61.100.32.0/26 (64 addresses) 61.100.32.1 ..2 ..3 ..4 ISP 61.100.0.0/16 The Internet *AKA home router, ICS, firewall NAT* 61.100.32.128 (1 address)
- 17. 17 The NAT problem Internet 10.0.0.202 61.100.32.128 NAT ? Extn202 Phone Network 02 6262 9898 PABX
- 18. 18 Everything over HTTP •The Internet promises “everything over IP” – But NATs get in the way • Services collapsing into a small set of protocols – Based on an even more limited set of HTTP transactions between servers and clients – Independent of IPv4 or IPv6 Plumbing Application Client XML HTTP TCP Application Server XML HTTP TCPNAT ALG Service
- 19. 19 Rationale for IPv6 •Limitations of IPv4 address space – Around 7 years unallocated space remaining • Based on current exponential growth rates – More if unused addresses can be reclaimed • …or less if allocation rates increase • Loss of “end to end” connectivity – “Fog on the Internet” • Brian Carpenter, IETF, RFC 2775 – “Everything over HTTP” • Yes, we seem to need something new – But is IPv6 the only solution?
- 20. 20 Is IPv6 theonly solution? • Is there an alternative protocol? – Basic problem is well understood: multiplex a common communications bearer – Not many different approaches are even possible. • How long would a new design take? – A decade or longer – IPv6 has taken 12+ years so far • Would a new design effort produce a new and different architecture? – Or would it produce the same response to the same set of common constraints? – …with possibly a slightly different set of trade-offs… – Arguably not.
- 21. 21 How can IPv6happen?
- 22. 22 What’s the motivation? •Collectively, we all need IPv6 – But individually, it seems we are happy to wait – We have different motivations, because the current costs are not evenly shared • Long term, we want… – ISPs: Cheaper, simpler networks – Developers: Cheaper, more capable applications – Users: More applications, more value • Short term, we can expect… – ISPs: no user demand, more cost – Developers: no market without users and ISPs – Users: no difference at all – No reward for early adopters • … it’s the old “Chicken and Egg” syndrome…
- 23. 23 How can ithappen? • From biology and politics, we have two basic options • Evolution … – Gradual migration of existing IPv4 networks and their associated service market to IPv6 – “IPv6 is the friend of IPv4” • Revolution … – Opening up new applications with IPv6 that compete with IPv4 for industry resources, and for overall market share – “IPv4 is the enemy”
- 24. 24 The problem isreality • Technical – IPv6 is stable and well tested – But many technical issues are still being debated… • “The perfect is the enemy of the good” – Industry needs confidence and certainty • Business – NAT has worked too well – Existing industry based on network complexity, address scarcity, and insecurity – Lack of investor interest in more infrastructure costs • Short term interests vs long term imperatives – IPv6 promotion - too much too early? • IPv6 may be seen as “tired” and not “wired”
- 25. 25 The result… • Shortterm business pressures support the case for further deferral of IPv6 infrastructure investment • There is insufficient linkage between the added cost, complexity and fragility of NAT- based applications and the costs of infrastructure deployment of IPv6 • An evolutionary adoption seems unlikely in today’s environment – …or in the foreseeable future
- 26. 26 The IPv4 revolution •The 1990’s – a new world of… – Cheaper switching technologies – Cheaper bandwidth – Lower operational costs – The PC revolution, funded by users • The Internet boom – The dumb (and cheap) network – Technical and business innovation at the ends – Many compelling business cases for new services and innovation
- 27. 27 An IPv6 revolution… •The 2000’s – a new world of… – Commodity Internet provision, lean and mean – Massive reduction in cost of consumer electronics – A network-ready society • The IPv6 boom? – “Internet for Everything” – Serving the communications requirements of a device- dense world – Device population some 2–3 orders of magnitude larger than today’s Internet – Service costs must be cheaper by 2-3 orders of magnitude – per packet
- 28. 28 IPv6 – FromPC to iPOD to iPOT • A world of billions of chattering devices • Or even trillions…
- 29.
- 30. 30 The IPv6 Challenge •There are too few compelling feature or revenue levers in IPv6 to drive new investments in existing service platforms • But the silicon industry has made the shift from value to volume years ago • The Internet industry must follow – From value to volume in IP(v6) packets – Reducing packet transmission costs by orders of magnitude – To an IPv6 Internet embracing a world of trillions of devices – To a true utility model of service provision
- 31. 31 The IPv6 Opportunity •IPv6 as the catalyst for shifting the Internet infrastructure industry a further giant leap into a future of truly ubiquitous commodity utility plumbing! • Evolution takes millions of years • The revolution could start any time • Be prepared!
- 32.