Treatment Information 
Patient: R.W 
Age: 43 
Gender: F 
Invisalign Treatment Option: Full 
Case treated by : Dr Raman Aulakh BDS MSc Orth 
CL II DIV 2 ,SEVERE CROWDING, DEEP-BITE, 
MISSING UR2, MICRODONTIC UL2
Pre-treatment photos
Clincheck images [before and after]
CLINCHECK ANALYSIS 
• Upper central incisors moved with torque, intrusion and retraction. 
• Upper lateral incisor UL2 extruded combined with controlled tip. 
• Expansion and change of square arch forms in both arches. 
• Use of precision attachments as required to de-rotate, extrude and 
torque. Also used for anchorage in deep correction.. 
• Interproximal reduction of lower anterior teeth to control amount of 
lower incisor proclination and avoid extraction treatment. [0.2mm from 
mesial and distal of each contact point of LL3,LL2,LL1,LR1,LR2,LR3]
Precision Attachments Used 
Pre – G5 case
Post-ortho photos
Smile improvement: 
pre-ortho, post-ortho, post-restorative
TREATMENT SUMMARY 
Results Achieved: 
• Overjet controlled. 
• Buccal occlusion maintained. 
• Crowding resolved 
Total treatment time: 
• 24 months 
Number of Aligners: 
• Maxillary: 37 + (R 13) 
• Mandibular: 31 + (R 10) 
Comments: 
• Good aesthetic result with 
minimal restorative work 
required afterwards. 
• Stability issue due to lower 
incisor proclination 
• Recession concern: biotype limit 
• Anterior IPR limit reached. 
Retention: 
• Maxillary: 
Hawley retainer 
Fixed retainer 3-3 
• Mandibular: 
Hawley retainer 
Fixed wire retainer 3-3
Thank you ! 
Dr Raman Aulakh BDS MSc Orth 
Specialist Orthodontist 
Post-graduate Tutor [Aesthetic Dentistry] 
Clinical Speaker Invisalign 
www.ramanaulakh.com

Invisalign case #1

  • 1.
    Treatment Information Patient:R.W Age: 43 Gender: F Invisalign Treatment Option: Full Case treated by : Dr Raman Aulakh BDS MSc Orth CL II DIV 2 ,SEVERE CROWDING, DEEP-BITE, MISSING UR2, MICRODONTIC UL2
  • 3.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    CLINCHECK ANALYSIS •Upper central incisors moved with torque, intrusion and retraction. • Upper lateral incisor UL2 extruded combined with controlled tip. • Expansion and change of square arch forms in both arches. • Use of precision attachments as required to de-rotate, extrude and torque. Also used for anchorage in deep correction.. • Interproximal reduction of lower anterior teeth to control amount of lower incisor proclination and avoid extraction treatment. [0.2mm from mesial and distal of each contact point of LL3,LL2,LL1,LR1,LR2,LR3]
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Smile improvement: pre-ortho,post-ortho, post-restorative
  • 11.
    TREATMENT SUMMARY ResultsAchieved: • Overjet controlled. • Buccal occlusion maintained. • Crowding resolved Total treatment time: • 24 months Number of Aligners: • Maxillary: 37 + (R 13) • Mandibular: 31 + (R 10) Comments: • Good aesthetic result with minimal restorative work required afterwards. • Stability issue due to lower incisor proclination • Recession concern: biotype limit • Anterior IPR limit reached. Retention: • Maxillary: Hawley retainer Fixed retainer 3-3 • Mandibular: Hawley retainer Fixed wire retainer 3-3
  • 12.
    Thank you ! Dr Raman Aulakh BDS MSc Orth Specialist Orthodontist Post-graduate Tutor [Aesthetic Dentistry] Clinical Speaker Invisalign www.ramanaulakh.com