Shanghai International Program for Development Evaluation Training Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center; 200 Panlong Road-Shanghai, October 9, 2008
Review the process for planning a grant, applying for a grant and implementing a grant.
Mandatory attendance if your club has submitted a District Grant application or plans on submitting a Global Grant application for the 2016-2017 Rotary year.
The document summarizes an evaluation training presentation about the independent evaluation department (OED) at the Asian Development Bank (ADB). It provides an overview of OED's role, methodology, and evaluation of the Shanghai-Nanpu bridge project in China. OED is ADB's independent evaluation unit that undertakes evaluations to improve ADB operations and development effectiveness. It evaluates projects, programs, strategies, and policies. The presentation described OED's evaluation of the Shanghai-Nanpu bridge project in China, which was found to be highly successful and deliver significant economic and development benefits.
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015Bradford Davey
Technology for Learning Consortium presents their Evaluation Impact Workshop at the AGU Fall Meeting in conjunction with the NASA Astrobiology E/PO Lead
This document discusses the challenges of conducting impact evaluations of agricultural extension programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. It notes that while most impact evaluations have found positive effects, some studies have produced contradictory results. There are several challenges to impact evaluation, including difficulties establishing a counterfactual, attribution of outcomes to the program given multiple influences, and methodological limitations like lack of baseline data and small sample sizes. The document argues for moving beyond a focus on proving impact to instead emphasize learning from evaluations and using flexible, low-cost methods to improve programs over time.
This document provides an overview of project monitoring and evaluation. It defines monitoring as the regular collection of information to track changes over time, and evaluation as analyzing the effectiveness and impact of a project. The key purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to assess results, improve management, promote learning, ensure accountability, and understand stakeholder perspectives. Effective monitoring and evaluation considers outputs, processes, outcomes, impact, and reach. Internal evaluation is done by project staff, while external evaluation involves independent evaluators assessing how funds were used. Distinctions are made between monitoring as an ongoing activity and evaluation as an in-depth assessment.
Monitoring and evaluation are important processes for projects. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and recording information about all aspects of a project to inform decision-making and ensure progress is communicated. Evaluation assesses the merit and worth of project activities, outcomes, and impacts. Both processes provide accountability, promote learning, and help understand stakeholder perspectives to improve future project management, planning, and effectiveness. Key needs include assessing results, understanding different views, and ensuring accountability.
The document discusses program evaluation, defining it as the systematic assessment of a program's operations and outcomes compared to explicit or implicit standards in order to contribute to the program's improvement. It notes that evaluation takes a systematic approach, considers unexpected consequences, and measures change before and after a program. The document outlines the evaluation process, standards for evaluation including utility, feasibility, accuracy and propriety, and principles such as systematic inquiry and respect for people. It discusses why programs are evaluated and when evaluation should occur.
Review the process for planning a grant, applying for a grant and implementing a grant.
Mandatory attendance if your club has submitted a District Grant application or plans on submitting a Global Grant application for the 2016-2017 Rotary year.
The document summarizes an evaluation training presentation about the independent evaluation department (OED) at the Asian Development Bank (ADB). It provides an overview of OED's role, methodology, and evaluation of the Shanghai-Nanpu bridge project in China. OED is ADB's independent evaluation unit that undertakes evaluations to improve ADB operations and development effectiveness. It evaluates projects, programs, strategies, and policies. The presentation described OED's evaluation of the Shanghai-Nanpu bridge project in China, which was found to be highly successful and deliver significant economic and development benefits.
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015Bradford Davey
Technology for Learning Consortium presents their Evaluation Impact Workshop at the AGU Fall Meeting in conjunction with the NASA Astrobiology E/PO Lead
This document discusses the challenges of conducting impact evaluations of agricultural extension programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. It notes that while most impact evaluations have found positive effects, some studies have produced contradictory results. There are several challenges to impact evaluation, including difficulties establishing a counterfactual, attribution of outcomes to the program given multiple influences, and methodological limitations like lack of baseline data and small sample sizes. The document argues for moving beyond a focus on proving impact to instead emphasize learning from evaluations and using flexible, low-cost methods to improve programs over time.
This document provides an overview of project monitoring and evaluation. It defines monitoring as the regular collection of information to track changes over time, and evaluation as analyzing the effectiveness and impact of a project. The key purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to assess results, improve management, promote learning, ensure accountability, and understand stakeholder perspectives. Effective monitoring and evaluation considers outputs, processes, outcomes, impact, and reach. Internal evaluation is done by project staff, while external evaluation involves independent evaluators assessing how funds were used. Distinctions are made between monitoring as an ongoing activity and evaluation as an in-depth assessment.
Monitoring and evaluation are important processes for projects. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and recording information about all aspects of a project to inform decision-making and ensure progress is communicated. Evaluation assesses the merit and worth of project activities, outcomes, and impacts. Both processes provide accountability, promote learning, and help understand stakeholder perspectives to improve future project management, planning, and effectiveness. Key needs include assessing results, understanding different views, and ensuring accountability.
The document discusses program evaluation, defining it as the systematic assessment of a program's operations and outcomes compared to explicit or implicit standards in order to contribute to the program's improvement. It notes that evaluation takes a systematic approach, considers unexpected consequences, and measures change before and after a program. The document outlines the evaluation process, standards for evaluation including utility, feasibility, accuracy and propriety, and principles such as systematic inquiry and respect for people. It discusses why programs are evaluated and when evaluation should occur.
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
Definations for Learning 24 July 2022 [Autosaved].pptxInayatUllah780749
1. M&E definitions provide explanations of key terms like monitoring, evaluation, and different types of evaluations such as formative, process, outcome, impact, and summative evaluations.
2. Different types of evaluations occur at various stages of a project and serve different purposes, such as improving project implementation, assessing progress, or evaluating overall impact.
3. Evaluating coherence considers how well a project's internal components and external partnerships support its goals, highlighting the importance of synergies within and beyond the project.
Evaluation serves two main purposes: accountability and learning. Development agencies have tended to prioritize the first, and given responsibility for that to centralized units. But evaluation for learning is the area where observers find the greatest need today and tomorrow. A learning approach to evaluation looks to designing evaluation with learning in mind.
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docxcherry686017
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images and claims about the nature and role of evaluation that confounds any attempt to construct a coher- ent account of its methods or confidently identify important new developments. We take the view that the overarching goal of the program evaluation enterprise is to contribute to the improvement of social conditions by providing scientifically credible information and balanced judgment to legitimate social agents about the effectiveness of interventions intended to produce social benefits. Because of its centrality in this perspective, this review focuses on outcome evaluation, that is, the assessment of the effects of interventions upon the populations they are intended to benefit. The coverage of this topic is concentrated on literature published within the last decade with particular attention to the period subsequent to the related reviews by Cook and Shadish (1994) on social experiments and Sechrest & Figueredo (1993) on program evaluation.
The word ‘evaluation’ has become increasingly used in the language of community, health and social services and programs. The growth of talk and practice of evaluation in these fields has often been promoted and encouraged by funders and commissioners of services and programs. Following the interest of funders, has been a growth in the study and practice of evaluation by community, health and social service practitioners and academics. When we consider why this move in evaluative thinking and practice has occurred, we can assume the position of the funder and simply answer, ‘...because we want to know if this program or service works’. Practitioners, specialists and academics in these fields have been called upon by governments and philanthropists to aid the development of effective evaluation. Over time, they have led their own thinking and practice independently. Evaluation in its simplest form is about understanding the effect and impact of a program, service, or indeed a whole organization. Evaluation as a practice is not so simple however, largely because in order to assess impact, we need to be very clear at the beginning what effect or difference we are trying to achieve.
The literature review begins with an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methods, followed by a description of key forms of evaluation. Health promotion evaluation and advocacy and policy evaluation will then be explored as two specific domains. These domains are not evaluation methodologies, but forms of evaluation that present unique requirements for effective community development evaluation. Following this discussion, the review will explore eight key evaluation methodologies: appreciative enquiry, empowerment evaluation, social capital,
social return on investment, outcomes based evaluation, performance dashboards and scorecards and developmental evaluation. Each of these sections will include specific methods, the values base of each methodo ...
Monitoring and evaluation are important project management tools. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and analyzing information to track progress over time, while evaluation analyzes effectiveness and impact through making judgments about progress. Participatory monitoring and evaluation involves stakeholders jointly monitoring and evaluating activities. The main purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to assess results, improve management, promote learning, understand stakeholder perspectives, and ensure accountability.
Considering the Evaluation Approach 思考评价方法Dadang Solihin
Shanghai International Program for Development Evaluation Training Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center; 200 Panlong Road-Shanghai, October 11, 2008
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of projects and programs. It defines monitoring as the regular collection and analysis of information to track changes over time, while evaluation analyzes effectiveness, direction, and impact of an activity. The main differences are timing (monitoring is ongoing, evaluation is periodic) and questions asked (monitoring checks progress, evaluation assesses outcomes and impact). M&E helps assess results, improve management, promote learning, and ensure accountability. Key criteria for evaluating development assistance include relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
The document discusses project management, defining it as the application of knowledge and skills to meet project requirements through processes like planning, executing, and controlling. It outlines key aspects of project management including defining objectives, constraints, life cycles, and phases. The document also discusses evaluation and assessment as important parts of the project management process.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Project management.Muthuraj K
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a set of techniques used in project management to establish controls and ensure a project stays on track to achieve its objectives. Monitoring involves systematically collecting, analyzing, and using information for management decisions and control. It provides information to identify and solve problems and assess progress. Evaluation determines the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, impact, and sustainability of a project. Both monitoring and evaluation are important for project management and should be integrated throughout the project cycle.
This document discusses tools for monitoring and evaluating extension interventions. It begins by defining monitoring as the systematic collection of data during program implementation to track progress, while evaluation assesses overall outcomes and impacts. A variety of quantitative and qualitative tools are described that can be used for both monitoring and evaluation. Key points include selecting appropriate tools based on the program stage, comparing monitoring and evaluation, and using indicators to quantify qualitative data and assess economic impacts. The document provides examples of how these tools can be applied to assess dairy extension programs.
This document contains information about a student named Mohamed Said Omar who is taking a course on Monitoring and Evaluation. It provides details about the student's registration information and the lecture. It then discusses the key differences between monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring involves regularly collecting implementation data, while evaluation assesses effectiveness and outcomes. The document also explains key principles of monitoring and evaluation like having clear indicators, reporting by relevant bodies, and using a results framework to link activities to goals. Overall, the document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts and how they are applied in a course on this topic.
Program Rationale and Logic for Post MonitoringThabang Nare
1) Project monitoring is an integral part of project management that provides information to identify implementation problems and assess progress towards objectives. It determines relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
2) Monitoring collects and analyzes information regularly to track implementation and measure performance against expected results. It is a management tool that provides information to support decision making and adaptive management.
3) Participatory evaluation seeks to actively engage stakeholders in reflecting on and assessing project progress, achievement of results, and taking joint action from evaluation findings. It assesses efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability, and impact.
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdfnoblex1
We hope this guide helps practitioners and others strengthen programs designed to increase academic achievement, ultimately broadening access to higher education for youth and adults.
We believe that evaluation is a critical part of program design and is necessary for ongoing program improvement. Evaluation requires collecting reliable, current and compelling information to empower stakeholders to make better decisions about programs and organizational practices that directly affect students. A good evaluation is an effective way of gathering information that strengthens programs, identifies problems, and assesses the extent of change over time. A sound evaluation that prompts program improvement is also a positive sign to funders and other stakeholders, and can help to sustain their commitment to your program.
Theories of change are conceptual maps that show how and why program activities will achieve short-term, interim, and long-term outcomes. The underlying assumptions that promote, support, and sustain a program often seem self-evident to program planners. Consequently, they spend too little time clarifying those assumptions for implementers and participants. Explicit theories of change provoke continuous reflection and shared ownership of the work to be accomplished. Even the most experienced program planners sometimes make the mistake of thinking an innovative design will accomplish goals without checking the linkages among assumptions and plans.
Developing a theory of change is a team effort. The collective knowledge and experience of program staff, stakeholders, and participants contribute to formulating a clear, precise statement about how and why a program will work. Using a theory-based approach, program collaborators state what they are doing and why by working backwards from the outcomes they seek to the interventions they plan, and forward from interventions to desired outcomes. When defining a theory of change, program planners usually begin by deciding expected outcomes, aligning outcomes with goals, deciding on the best indicators to evaluate progress toward desired outcomes, and developing specific measures for evaluating results. The end product is a statement of the expected change that specifies how implementation, resources, and evaluation translate into desired outcomes.
Continuously evaluating a theory of change encourages program planners to keep an eye on their goals. Statements about how and why a program will work must be established using the knowledge of program staff, stakeholders, and participants. This statement represents the theory underlying the program plan and shows planners how resources and activities translate to desired improvements and outcomes. It also becomes a framework for program implementation and evaluation.
Source: https://ebookscheaper.com/2022/04/06/a-good-program-can-improve-educational-outcomes/
The document discusses strategic planning for medical practices. It defines strategic planning as a formal process that helps organizations maintain optimal alignment with their environment through goal setting and performance measurement. The strategic planning process involves conducting an environmental scan, developing a mission and vision, setting goals and objectives, creating action plans, and evaluating performance. It provides frameworks for conducting a SWOT analysis and developing a strategic plan with all necessary components.
Curriculum monitoring involves periodically assessing curriculum implementation and making adjustments. It determines how well the curriculum is working and informs decisions about retaining, improving, or modifying aspects. The document outlines the definition, rationale, types, roles, process, and similarities and differences between monitoring and evaluation. An effective monitoring system is simple, provides timely feedback, is cost-effective, flexible, accurate, comprehensive, relevant, and leads to learning. It involves clarifying roles, identifying evidence, data collection tools, training monitors, preparing staff, conducting monitoring, analyzing and sharing results, and determining a plan of action.
Monitoring involves continuous assessment of project implementation to provide feedback and identify successes and problems. It focuses on schedules, inputs, and services. Evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, effectiveness, and sustainability. The document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation for improving decision-making, achieving outcomes, and organizational learning. It provides definitions and comparisons of monitoring and evaluation. Participatory approaches are emphasized to empower stakeholders. Clear objectives and indicators are needed to measure progress.
This document provides information on strategic planning for medical practices. It defines strategic planning as a systematic process that results in long-term goals and objectives to achieve a desired future vision. The strategic planning process involves conducting an environmental scan, identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, and developing a mission, vision, values, and goals. It also outlines developing objectives, action plans, initiatives, and key performance indicators to evaluate progress. Regular review and adjustment of the strategic plan allows for continuous feedback and improvement.
The document discusses evaluation of health programs. It defines evaluation as the systematic acquisition and assessment of information to provide useful feedback. The main goals of evaluation are to influence decision-making and policy formulation through empirically-driven feedback. Formative evaluation assesses needs and implementation, while summative evaluation determines outcomes, impacts, costs and benefits. Evaluation questions, methods, and frameworks are described to establish program merit, worth and significance based on credible evidence from stakeholders. Standards ensure evaluations are useful, feasible, proper and accurate.
Evaluation and performance measurement serve several key purposes:
1) They help ensure accountability, focus efforts on valuable results, and increase investor commitment.
2) They provide useful feedback to stakeholders to help them make wise decisions about resources.
3) They address quality improvement through systematic reflection on plans and progress.
Evaluation focuses on interventions while performance measurement focuses on results over time. Evaluation looks for qualitative stories while measurement looks for quantitative signals. The goal of evaluation is to provide useful feedback to influence decisions. There are various evaluation strategies and methods that can be used formatively to improve programs or summatively to examine outcomes and impacts. Performance measurement establishes metrics in key areas like effectiveness, efficiency, quality and time
Permohonan Pembatalan Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum No. 360 Tahun 2024.pdfDadang Solihin
Tentang Penetapan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Secara Nasional dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024 tertanggal 20 Maret 2024
Marty M. Natalegawa, 2021, Geopolitik dan Perekonomian Indonesia Dampak dan R...Dadang Solihin
Sejarah dan kajian empiris membuktikan bahwa dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik global berpengaruh kuat terhadap kondisi ekonomi dan politik suatu negara. Ketegangan Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok di Laut Cina Selatan serta perang dagang antara kedua negara, konflik berkelanjutan di Timur Tengah, ketegangan politik Amerika Serikat dan Rusi a, isu climate change, sampai dengan merebaknya Covid-19 di berbagai belahan dunia dan ketidakberimbangan distribusi vaksin, merupakan contoh berbagai dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik. Bank Indonesia menyadari bahwa berbagai dinamika tersebut, secara langsung maupun tidak langsung, berpengaruh terhadap perekonomian dan politik di domestik. Untuk itu, pemahaman yang utuh dan mendalam mengenai dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik global sangat dibutuhkan, khususnya bagi para pengambil kebijakan publik, termasuk di bank sentral.
More Related Content
Similar to Introduction to Development Evaluation 发展评价导言
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
Definations for Learning 24 July 2022 [Autosaved].pptxInayatUllah780749
1. M&E definitions provide explanations of key terms like monitoring, evaluation, and different types of evaluations such as formative, process, outcome, impact, and summative evaluations.
2. Different types of evaluations occur at various stages of a project and serve different purposes, such as improving project implementation, assessing progress, or evaluating overall impact.
3. Evaluating coherence considers how well a project's internal components and external partnerships support its goals, highlighting the importance of synergies within and beyond the project.
Evaluation serves two main purposes: accountability and learning. Development agencies have tended to prioritize the first, and given responsibility for that to centralized units. But evaluation for learning is the area where observers find the greatest need today and tomorrow. A learning approach to evaluation looks to designing evaluation with learning in mind.
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docxcherry686017
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images and claims about the nature and role of evaluation that confounds any attempt to construct a coher- ent account of its methods or confidently identify important new developments. We take the view that the overarching goal of the program evaluation enterprise is to contribute to the improvement of social conditions by providing scientifically credible information and balanced judgment to legitimate social agents about the effectiveness of interventions intended to produce social benefits. Because of its centrality in this perspective, this review focuses on outcome evaluation, that is, the assessment of the effects of interventions upon the populations they are intended to benefit. The coverage of this topic is concentrated on literature published within the last decade with particular attention to the period subsequent to the related reviews by Cook and Shadish (1994) on social experiments and Sechrest & Figueredo (1993) on program evaluation.
The word ‘evaluation’ has become increasingly used in the language of community, health and social services and programs. The growth of talk and practice of evaluation in these fields has often been promoted and encouraged by funders and commissioners of services and programs. Following the interest of funders, has been a growth in the study and practice of evaluation by community, health and social service practitioners and academics. When we consider why this move in evaluative thinking and practice has occurred, we can assume the position of the funder and simply answer, ‘...because we want to know if this program or service works’. Practitioners, specialists and academics in these fields have been called upon by governments and philanthropists to aid the development of effective evaluation. Over time, they have led their own thinking and practice independently. Evaluation in its simplest form is about understanding the effect and impact of a program, service, or indeed a whole organization. Evaluation as a practice is not so simple however, largely because in order to assess impact, we need to be very clear at the beginning what effect or difference we are trying to achieve.
The literature review begins with an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methods, followed by a description of key forms of evaluation. Health promotion evaluation and advocacy and policy evaluation will then be explored as two specific domains. These domains are not evaluation methodologies, but forms of evaluation that present unique requirements for effective community development evaluation. Following this discussion, the review will explore eight key evaluation methodologies: appreciative enquiry, empowerment evaluation, social capital,
social return on investment, outcomes based evaluation, performance dashboards and scorecards and developmental evaluation. Each of these sections will include specific methods, the values base of each methodo ...
Monitoring and evaluation are important project management tools. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and analyzing information to track progress over time, while evaluation analyzes effectiveness and impact through making judgments about progress. Participatory monitoring and evaluation involves stakeholders jointly monitoring and evaluating activities. The main purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to assess results, improve management, promote learning, understand stakeholder perspectives, and ensure accountability.
Considering the Evaluation Approach 思考评价方法Dadang Solihin
Shanghai International Program for Development Evaluation Training Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center; 200 Panlong Road-Shanghai, October 11, 2008
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of projects and programs. It defines monitoring as the regular collection and analysis of information to track changes over time, while evaluation analyzes effectiveness, direction, and impact of an activity. The main differences are timing (monitoring is ongoing, evaluation is periodic) and questions asked (monitoring checks progress, evaluation assesses outcomes and impact). M&E helps assess results, improve management, promote learning, and ensure accountability. Key criteria for evaluating development assistance include relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
The document discusses project management, defining it as the application of knowledge and skills to meet project requirements through processes like planning, executing, and controlling. It outlines key aspects of project management including defining objectives, constraints, life cycles, and phases. The document also discusses evaluation and assessment as important parts of the project management process.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Project management.Muthuraj K
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a set of techniques used in project management to establish controls and ensure a project stays on track to achieve its objectives. Monitoring involves systematically collecting, analyzing, and using information for management decisions and control. It provides information to identify and solve problems and assess progress. Evaluation determines the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, impact, and sustainability of a project. Both monitoring and evaluation are important for project management and should be integrated throughout the project cycle.
This document discusses tools for monitoring and evaluating extension interventions. It begins by defining monitoring as the systematic collection of data during program implementation to track progress, while evaluation assesses overall outcomes and impacts. A variety of quantitative and qualitative tools are described that can be used for both monitoring and evaluation. Key points include selecting appropriate tools based on the program stage, comparing monitoring and evaluation, and using indicators to quantify qualitative data and assess economic impacts. The document provides examples of how these tools can be applied to assess dairy extension programs.
This document contains information about a student named Mohamed Said Omar who is taking a course on Monitoring and Evaluation. It provides details about the student's registration information and the lecture. It then discusses the key differences between monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring involves regularly collecting implementation data, while evaluation assesses effectiveness and outcomes. The document also explains key principles of monitoring and evaluation like having clear indicators, reporting by relevant bodies, and using a results framework to link activities to goals. Overall, the document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts and how they are applied in a course on this topic.
Program Rationale and Logic for Post MonitoringThabang Nare
1) Project monitoring is an integral part of project management that provides information to identify implementation problems and assess progress towards objectives. It determines relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
2) Monitoring collects and analyzes information regularly to track implementation and measure performance against expected results. It is a management tool that provides information to support decision making and adaptive management.
3) Participatory evaluation seeks to actively engage stakeholders in reflecting on and assessing project progress, achievement of results, and taking joint action from evaluation findings. It assesses efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability, and impact.
A Good Program Can Improve Educational Outcomes.pdfnoblex1
We hope this guide helps practitioners and others strengthen programs designed to increase academic achievement, ultimately broadening access to higher education for youth and adults.
We believe that evaluation is a critical part of program design and is necessary for ongoing program improvement. Evaluation requires collecting reliable, current and compelling information to empower stakeholders to make better decisions about programs and organizational practices that directly affect students. A good evaluation is an effective way of gathering information that strengthens programs, identifies problems, and assesses the extent of change over time. A sound evaluation that prompts program improvement is also a positive sign to funders and other stakeholders, and can help to sustain their commitment to your program.
Theories of change are conceptual maps that show how and why program activities will achieve short-term, interim, and long-term outcomes. The underlying assumptions that promote, support, and sustain a program often seem self-evident to program planners. Consequently, they spend too little time clarifying those assumptions for implementers and participants. Explicit theories of change provoke continuous reflection and shared ownership of the work to be accomplished. Even the most experienced program planners sometimes make the mistake of thinking an innovative design will accomplish goals without checking the linkages among assumptions and plans.
Developing a theory of change is a team effort. The collective knowledge and experience of program staff, stakeholders, and participants contribute to formulating a clear, precise statement about how and why a program will work. Using a theory-based approach, program collaborators state what they are doing and why by working backwards from the outcomes they seek to the interventions they plan, and forward from interventions to desired outcomes. When defining a theory of change, program planners usually begin by deciding expected outcomes, aligning outcomes with goals, deciding on the best indicators to evaluate progress toward desired outcomes, and developing specific measures for evaluating results. The end product is a statement of the expected change that specifies how implementation, resources, and evaluation translate into desired outcomes.
Continuously evaluating a theory of change encourages program planners to keep an eye on their goals. Statements about how and why a program will work must be established using the knowledge of program staff, stakeholders, and participants. This statement represents the theory underlying the program plan and shows planners how resources and activities translate to desired improvements and outcomes. It also becomes a framework for program implementation and evaluation.
Source: https://ebookscheaper.com/2022/04/06/a-good-program-can-improve-educational-outcomes/
The document discusses strategic planning for medical practices. It defines strategic planning as a formal process that helps organizations maintain optimal alignment with their environment through goal setting and performance measurement. The strategic planning process involves conducting an environmental scan, developing a mission and vision, setting goals and objectives, creating action plans, and evaluating performance. It provides frameworks for conducting a SWOT analysis and developing a strategic plan with all necessary components.
Curriculum monitoring involves periodically assessing curriculum implementation and making adjustments. It determines how well the curriculum is working and informs decisions about retaining, improving, or modifying aspects. The document outlines the definition, rationale, types, roles, process, and similarities and differences between monitoring and evaluation. An effective monitoring system is simple, provides timely feedback, is cost-effective, flexible, accurate, comprehensive, relevant, and leads to learning. It involves clarifying roles, identifying evidence, data collection tools, training monitors, preparing staff, conducting monitoring, analyzing and sharing results, and determining a plan of action.
Monitoring involves continuous assessment of project implementation to provide feedback and identify successes and problems. It focuses on schedules, inputs, and services. Evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, effectiveness, and sustainability. The document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation for improving decision-making, achieving outcomes, and organizational learning. It provides definitions and comparisons of monitoring and evaluation. Participatory approaches are emphasized to empower stakeholders. Clear objectives and indicators are needed to measure progress.
This document provides information on strategic planning for medical practices. It defines strategic planning as a systematic process that results in long-term goals and objectives to achieve a desired future vision. The strategic planning process involves conducting an environmental scan, identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, and developing a mission, vision, values, and goals. It also outlines developing objectives, action plans, initiatives, and key performance indicators to evaluate progress. Regular review and adjustment of the strategic plan allows for continuous feedback and improvement.
The document discusses evaluation of health programs. It defines evaluation as the systematic acquisition and assessment of information to provide useful feedback. The main goals of evaluation are to influence decision-making and policy formulation through empirically-driven feedback. Formative evaluation assesses needs and implementation, while summative evaluation determines outcomes, impacts, costs and benefits. Evaluation questions, methods, and frameworks are described to establish program merit, worth and significance based on credible evidence from stakeholders. Standards ensure evaluations are useful, feasible, proper and accurate.
Evaluation and performance measurement serve several key purposes:
1) They help ensure accountability, focus efforts on valuable results, and increase investor commitment.
2) They provide useful feedback to stakeholders to help them make wise decisions about resources.
3) They address quality improvement through systematic reflection on plans and progress.
Evaluation focuses on interventions while performance measurement focuses on results over time. Evaluation looks for qualitative stories while measurement looks for quantitative signals. The goal of evaluation is to provide useful feedback to influence decisions. There are various evaluation strategies and methods that can be used formatively to improve programs or summatively to examine outcomes and impacts. Performance measurement establishes metrics in key areas like effectiveness, efficiency, quality and time
Similar to Introduction to Development Evaluation 发展评价导言 (20)
Permohonan Pembatalan Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum No. 360 Tahun 2024.pdfDadang Solihin
Tentang Penetapan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Secara Nasional dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024 tertanggal 20 Maret 2024
Marty M. Natalegawa, 2021, Geopolitik dan Perekonomian Indonesia Dampak dan R...Dadang Solihin
Sejarah dan kajian empiris membuktikan bahwa dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik global berpengaruh kuat terhadap kondisi ekonomi dan politik suatu negara. Ketegangan Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok di Laut Cina Selatan serta perang dagang antara kedua negara, konflik berkelanjutan di Timur Tengah, ketegangan politik Amerika Serikat dan Rusi a, isu climate change, sampai dengan merebaknya Covid-19 di berbagai belahan dunia dan ketidakberimbangan distribusi vaksin, merupakan contoh berbagai dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik. Bank Indonesia menyadari bahwa berbagai dinamika tersebut, secara langsung maupun tidak langsung, berpengaruh terhadap perekonomian dan politik di domestik. Untuk itu, pemahaman yang utuh dan mendalam mengenai dinamika geoekonomi dan geopolitik global sangat dibutuhkan, khususnya bagi para pengambil kebijakan publik, termasuk di bank sentral.
Mark Turner, David Hulme & Willy Mccourt, Governance, Management & Developmen...Dadang Solihin
This extensively revised edition of the authors' successful textbook Governance, Administration and Development updates its framework and analysis in light of the changed context of the twenty-first century. It continues to provide a comprehensive introduction to public policy and management in developing countries and transitional economies while also taking account of changes in the theory and practice of development management since the first edition. The authors emphasize the role of the state within development, paying careful attention to contemporary approaches and to changing attitudes towards the state. This involves examining the nature of the policy process, civil service reform, planning and decentralization, as well as showing the changing nature of the state's involvement in promoting economic development and its engagement with civil society.
Catatan Harian Ahmad Wahib - Pergolakan Pemikiran Islam disertai Komentar Pro...Dadang Solihin
Ahmad Wahib meninggal dalam usia yang masih muda. Sebuah sepeda motor dengan kecepatan tinggi telah menabraknya dipersimpangan jalan Senen Raya-Kalilio. Peristiwa itu terjadi tanggal 31 Maret malam tahun 1973. Ketika itu Wahib baru saja keluar dari kantor Majalah Tempo, tempat ia bekerja sebagai calon reporter.
Ben Bland - Man of Contradictions Joko Widodo and the struggle to remake Indo...Dadang Solihin
Man of Contradictions, the first English-language biography of Jokowi, argues that the president embodies the fundamental contradictions of modern Indonesia. He is caught between democracy and authoritarianism, openness and protectionism, Islam and pluralism. Jokowi’s incredible story shows what is possible in Indonesia – and it also shows the limits.
Saat-Saat Terakhir di Universitas Darma Persada - Darma Persada Daigaku de no...Dadang Solihin
Jakarta, 10 Desember 2018
Kronologis suatu proses pertumbuhan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Universitas Darma Persada yang dalam jangka pendek ternyata bisa dipacu untuk melejit mengangkasa, namun dalam perjalanannya justru dihalang-halangi untuk maju dan mendapat hambatan yang keras dari yayasan sebagai badan penyelenggaranya, sehingga dikhawatirkan akan jatuh tersungkur berkeping-keping.
Wisuda Universitas Darma Persada Program Magister, Sarjana, & Diploma di Bala...Dadang Solihin
Jakarta, 27 September 2018
Pada hari yang penuh kegembiraan ini, Unsada menggelar Wisuda ke-28 di Balai Sudirman Jl. Dr. Saharjo, Tebet, Jakarta Selatan. Untuk Wisuda kali ini, Unsada meluluskan 598 Wisudawan yang terdiri dari Sastra Jepang S1 sebanyak 164 Wisudawan, Sastra Cina S1 sebanyak 30 Wisudawan, Sastra Inggris S1 sebanyak 57 Wisudawan, Bahasa Jepang D3 sebanyak 14 Wisudawan, Bahasa Inggris D3 sebanyak 8 Wisudawan, Teknik Elektro S1 sebanyak 11 Wisudawan, Teknik Industri S1 sebanyak 15 Wisudawan, Teknik Informatika S1 sebanyak 52 Wisudawan, Sistem Informasi S1 sebanyak 32 Wisudawan, Teknik Mesin S1 sebanyak 35 Wisudawan, Teknik Perkapalan S1 sebanyak 8 Wisudawan, Teknik Sistem Perkapalan S1 sebanyak 4 Wisudawan, Manajemen S1 sebanyak 96 Wisudawan, Akuntansi S1 sebanyak 65 Wisudawan, dan Energi Terbarukan S2 sebanyak 7 Wisudawan.
Status Kepemilikan Kampus UNSADA Pondok Kelapa Jakarta TimurDadang Solihin
Jakarta, 28 September 2018
Untuk mengingatkan kita semua bahwa status tanah kampus Unsada sampai saat ini masih dimiliki oleh pihak lain, yaitu PT. Danayasa Arthatama Tbk (PTDA). Oleh karena itu, seluruh jajaran kampus Unsada supaya memiliki pemahaman yang sama tentang masalah yang tidak boleh dianggap enteng ini yang kelak di kemudian hari tidak menutup kemungkinan akan menimbulkan mala petaka.
Who Dares Wins - Kill or Be Killed, Reaksi Rektor UNSADA terhadap Review Tim ...Dadang Solihin
Jakarta, 27 September 2017
Belum genap dua tahun menjabat sebagai Rektor Unsada, pada tanggal 31 Mei 2017 Yayasan Melati Sakura sudah mengeluarkan review/evaluasi kinerja Rektor yang dikenal sebagai Review Tim Tiga. Bahkan sudah disiapkan calon pengganti Rektor, yaitu Sdr. Agus Salim Dasuki.
The President Can Do No Wrong, Pilpres 2024 dan Cawe-Cawe P JKWDadang Solihin
SBY: Saya ikut tertarik untuk bicara soal “cawe-cawenya Pak Jokowi” dalam Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2024. Nampaknya masyarakat kita terbelah memaknai istilah cawe-cawe.
Evaluasi Rencana Pembangunan Daerah -Penyelarasan RPJPN-RPJDDadang Solihin
Capacity Building DPRD Provinsi Lampung di Holiday Inn Gajah Mada-Jakarta, 27 Februari 2024
- Apa Itu RPJPD dan RPJMD?
- Apa Itu Pembangunan?
- Visi Indonesia Emas 2045
- 5 Sasaran Visi Indonesia 2025-2045
- 8 Misi Pembangunan
- 17 Arah Pembangunan
- 45 Indikator Utama Pembangunan
- Penyusunan RPJPD 2025-2045
- Evaluasi Penyelarasan RPJPD dengan RPJPN 2025-2045
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
ROYAL ENFIELD OWNER MANUAL Thunderbird 500Dadang Solihin
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
ROYAL ENFIELD OWNER MANUAL Interceptor 650Dadang Solihin
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
ROYAL ENFIELD OWNER MANUAL Himalayan BS IVDadang Solihin
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
ROYAL ENFIELD CRUSADER 250 Instruction BookDadang Solihin
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
Royal Enfield is an Indian motorcycle company with British roots. She produces models of old motorcycles, which were very popular at the time, but, despite this, are in demand now. Motorcycles of this brand are also called "time machines".
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Introduction to Development Evaluation 发展评价导言
1. Introduction to Development Evaluation 发展评价导言 Shanghai International Program for Development Evaluation Training Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center 200 Panlong Road-Shanghai, October 9, 2008 Linda Morra-Imas
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28. Timeline 时间历程 www.dadangsolihin.com Expansion into global activity 扩张至全球活动 1980s to now 20 世纪 80 年代至今 mid 1970-80 20 世纪 70 年代中期 -80 年代 Profession status 专业地位 More routine (US and Europe) 更加常规化(美国和欧洲) 1950s-60s 20 世纪 50-60 年代 1957 Sputnik (前苏联)人造地球卫星 1900 Medical Schools (US and Canada) 医学院(美国和加拿大) 1880 Education and Social Programs 教育和社会计划 Modern Evaluations 现代评价 1600 Egypt and China 埃及和中国 2000 BC 公元前 2000 年 1940 Reconstruction after WW – Banks 世界大战后的重建——银行