1. Multibeam Echo-sounding System
& Single-beam Echo-sounding System
1
- Components of a single-beam echo-sounding system
(SBES)
- Components of a multibeam echo-sounding system
(MBES)
- Comparison between SBES and MBES
- Positioning System of SBES and MBES
- Foot print of SBES and MBES
20 February 2012 1
2. Single Beam Echosounding System
• Simple configuration
– GPS Antenna (for
positioning)
– Single transducer (for
sounding)
• Minimum coverage
of survey area
2
7. Multi-Beam Contour
Mapping System
Magnetic
Intensity
Satellite Communication
(INMARSAT)
Expendable
Sensors
Acoustic Doppler
Current Profiler
CTD & Water
Sampler
Gravity
Meter
SUB-BOTTOM
PROFILER
HEADING & DYNAMIC
MOTION SENSOR
DGPS Reference
Station
Satellite Navigation (GPS)
SURVEY SYSTEMS CONFIGURATION OF BRPH PRESBITERO AND VENTURA
17. Method Soundings/hr Mb/hr
Lead line 10 .00008
Echo sounder 21,600 .1728
1st gen. 292,000 2.1
2nd gen. 324,000 27.9 (ss)
3rd gen. 1,500,000 79.8 (ss)
in 5 m of water 30,000,000 1,000
Fansweep-30 300,000,000? 10,000??
Water column data 60,000
From Dr. Larry Mayer
Data Volume Comparison
17
21. Summary
- Single-beam echo-sounding systems can provide enough data for
near-shore surveys and other surveys which does not require a full
sea-floor coverage.
- The positioning system of a multibeam echo-sounding system is more
complex compared to a single-beam system.
- The vast amount of data that comes with the continuous
development of the multibeam echo-sounding system requires more
powerful algorithms and programs for data processing.
- The narrow beamwidth and smaller footprint of MBES results to a
more accurate and better horizontal resolution of the sea-floor as
compared to the larger foorprint of SBES.
21