20   2555
(1)
•
    –   (Globalization Process)
    –

    –


    –
(2)
–

                          2543

    (Transition period)




–                            (Sensitive)
Real Per Capita GDP 1993-2011

   Per Capita GDP (at constant   prices)




                                           Per Capita
                                           GDP (at
                                           constant
                                           prices)
Per Capita GDP Growth 1994-2011

          Per Capita GDP Growth (at constant   prices)




                                                     Per Capita
                                                     GDP Growth
                                                     (at constant
                                                           prices)
    -




-




-
•

                                (Import
    Substitution Policy)
                       (Export-led Growth
    Policy)
•


                                 40
Trade to GDP (   constant price)
Potential Productivity Improvement
                   from Trade
• Efficiency Improvement: better utilization of
  resources in the economy
• Technology Improvement: international
  business is one of the mechanism lead to
  technology transfers
• Economies of Scale: international trade allows
  firms to realize benefits from scale buy
  producing at a larger scale (moving down the
  long-run marginal cost curve)
•                                   (Host
    Country): Inflows of FDI
    –




•                               (Home
    Country): Outflows of FDI
    –
Net export
    Investment
    Government spending
    Consumption




-
•

    –                    Mode 4
    –                   (         :
        Professional services)
•
    –



•
Measuring Comparative Advantage

• Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA)
                [EXki/TEXi] / [EXkw/TEXw]
• Boston Model
• Diamond Model
• Constant Market Share (CMS)
  –   World Effect (Global effects)
  –   Market Effect (Regional/Country effects)
  –   Product effect
  –   Competitiveness effect
Boston’s Competitiveness Model


Export
Share       High Share    High Share
           Low Growth    High Growth




            Low Share     Low Share
           Low Growth    High Growth


                                       Export
                                       Growth
2012
                GDP per     Scores   Ranking
              Capita(US$)
Hong Kong       37,351       100        1
    USA         37,691      97.755      2
Singapore       33,529      95.923      4
 Malaysia        5,364      84.217     14
  China          2,639      75.769     23
  Japan         39,578      71.354     27
 Thailand        2,698      69.001     30
   India          837       63.596     35
Indonesia        1,206      59.499     42
Philippines      1,410      59.271     43
2004-2012
              2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2011 2012
USA             1    1    1    1    1    1    2
Singapore       2    3    3    2    2    3    3
Hong Kong       3    2    2    3    3    1    1
China           6    8    5    4    4    6    6
Malaysia        4    6    6    5    5    4    4
Japan           5    4    4    6    6    7    7
Thailand        7    5    8    9    7    8    8
India           8    9    7    7    8    9    9
South Korea     9    7    9    8    9    5    5
Philippines    10   10   10   10   10   11   11
Indonesia      11   11   11   11   11   10   10
•


•


•


•
•
    –


    –




•       –
%

        Advanced economies

        Emerging and developing
        economies




    :                   (IMF)
        :        2010
C u rre n t A c c o u n t B a la n c e s , U S $ B n

                                                                                                                         900


                                                                   D e ve lo p in g A s ia + N IE s
                                                                                                                         600



                                                                                              Japan                      300



                                                                                                                         0

                                                                    E u ro p e a n U n io n
                                                                                                                         -3 0 0



                                                                                                                         -6 0 0
                                                            U n ite d S ta te s

                                                                                                                         -9 0 0
   1980   1982 1984   1986   1988   1990 1992   1994   1996 1998   2000   2002    2004 2006    2008   2010 2012   2014




                      :                                    (IMF)
                              :                 2010
•
                     (Public Debt)
    –


    –


•                             (Wealth)
        (Income) –
G- Advanced                            G-   Emerging
Low Income




: Fiscal Affair Department Data, IMF
•                                      2007
           607
    12.5         GDP        Roach, D. 2007)
•

    –
                   109%         1980
    316%         2005 –
                      140
• The Liquidity Pyramid – Global liquidity by
  source of Claim (2009)
 976% of                                 81% of
                  Derivatives            Liquidity
   World
   GDP
 145% of           Securitize            12% of
   World              d Debt            Liquidity
   GDP
  80% of                Bank              6% of
   World               Loans            Liquidity
                        Powe
   GDP
  7% of                   r               1% of
                        Mone
   World                  y             Liquidity
   GDP
•
    (spot, forward, and swaps)        3.2

•                                 (OTC)
          2.1
    (BIS 2007)
•
    (World trade volume)         12
•




•




•
•




•
•




•
•



•


•
•
•




•


•
Chart 14
Number of physical RTAs that entered into force since 2000
                     18                                                                                       160



                     16
                                                                                                              140


                     14
                                                                                                              120


                     12
                                                                                                              100




                                                                                                                    Cumulative number
   Number per year




                     10

                                                                                                              80

                     8

                                                                                                              60
                     6


                                                                                                              40
                     4


                                                                                                              20
                     2



                     0                                                                                        0
                          2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011


Source: WTO Secretariat.
ASEAN Economic
                            Integration
 Chart II.2
 ASEAN ‘Noodle Bowl’

             Pakistan                                                                        China      Japan
  SAFTA                               India                           APTA
             Nepal
  Bhutan                                          Bangladesh       Rep. Korea
  Afghanistan                                     Sri Lanka
  Maldives
                                                          Laos
                                                                                                  Chinese
                                                          Indonesia                                Taipei
  Bahrain

  Qatar                                         THAILAND
                                                                      Cambodia                Hong Kong,
  Jordan                              Myanmar                                                      China
                        BIMSTEC
                                                                                             Macao, China
                                                                  Philippines
                                                ASEAN
                                              (AFTA, AEC)          Viet Nam
  Ukraine                                                           Malaysia

   EFTA                                            Singapore

   EU                                                            Brunei
                                        TRANS-PACIFIC
                 TPP                    SEP                         Chile                                Peru
                  Australia
                                         New Zealand                                                        US

                                                 Panama          Mexico      Canada                  NAFTA
        Bloc-to-bloc or bloc-to-country                 Country-to-country                     Under negotiation
SAFTA = South Asian Free Trade Agreement; APTA = Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (previously known as Bangkok
Agreement, negotiated under UN-ESCAP); BIMSTEC = Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and
Economic Cooperation (under negotiation); AFTA = ASEAN Free Trade Area; AEC = ASEAN Economic Community
(under negotiation); Trans-Pacific SEP = Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement; NAFTA = North
American Free Trade Agreement; TPP = Trans-Pacific Partnership (under negotiation)
Source:   Data from Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Agreements Database (APTIAD, www.unescap.org/tid/aptiad/),
           [July 2011]. Graphic adapted from an original by Mia Mikic. See Mikic, Mia (2009), ASEAN and Trade
           Integration, UN ESCAP Staff Working Paper 01/09, 8 April. Some agreements are not included.
AEC 2015:

•
    (Single market and production base)
•
                (Improved regional
    competitiveness)
•
                       (Regional
    economic development equity
•
24 25 26 27 28
         58 58 58 58 58
(    )
60       1 .3 1 .3 1 .0 1 .0 2 .4
          0    2    5    8    0

65       7.3   8.3   1 .5 1 .1 1 .2
                      0    3    5

80       1.3   1.7   2.0   2.9   3.8
•
•
•

•
•
CO2
?




    39
?

      Ethan    Biode
     ol)      isel)



1.   3.
2.   4.
     5.
Supply          Demand)
)
             •
•
•

•
                       41


    Yield)
             •




-
         24
          58 25
             50 25 58 26 58 27 50
         6.
         51 6 . 4 6 . 8 7 . 5 7 . 6
             60    89    06    06
   (
 )
   1- 6 .
    5   68    6.
              72       6.
                        71   6.
                              38   6.
                                    29
5(
9
      )
    60 1.
        04    1.
              08       1.
                        42   2.
                              12   2.
                                    27

(    )
         72   73       75    77    na
•




•




•
•




•




•
•




•           FTA

•   ACFTA
TFP




                -
-
        -
            -
    -
50
•




•


•         Social safety
    net
52
•


•
•
    (Physical Infrastructure)   Soft
    Infrastructure
    ICT
•
•


•
    FDI




•
•

•   JTEPA

International economics relations and thailand economic strategy updated 181212

  • 1.
    20 2555
  • 2.
    (1) • – (Globalization Process) – – –
  • 3.
    (2) – 2543 (Transition period) – (Sensitive)
  • 4.
    Real Per CapitaGDP 1993-2011 Per Capita GDP (at constant prices) Per Capita GDP (at constant prices)
  • 5.
    Per Capita GDPGrowth 1994-2011 Per Capita GDP Growth (at constant prices) Per Capita GDP Growth (at constant prices) - - -
  • 6.
    (Import Substitution Policy) (Export-led Growth Policy) • 40
  • 7.
    Trade to GDP( constant price)
  • 8.
    Potential Productivity Improvement from Trade • Efficiency Improvement: better utilization of resources in the economy • Technology Improvement: international business is one of the mechanism lead to technology transfers • Economies of Scale: international trade allows firms to realize benefits from scale buy producing at a larger scale (moving down the long-run marginal cost curve)
  • 9.
    (Host Country): Inflows of FDI – • (Home Country): Outflows of FDI –
  • 10.
    Net export Investment Government spending Consumption -
  • 11.
    – Mode 4 – ( : Professional services) • – •
  • 12.
    Measuring Comparative Advantage •Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) [EXki/TEXi] / [EXkw/TEXw] • Boston Model • Diamond Model • Constant Market Share (CMS) – World Effect (Global effects) – Market Effect (Regional/Country effects) – Product effect – Competitiveness effect
  • 13.
    Boston’s Competitiveness Model Export Share High Share High Share Low Growth High Growth Low Share Low Share Low Growth High Growth Export Growth
  • 14.
    2012 GDP per Scores Ranking Capita(US$) Hong Kong 37,351 100 1 USA 37,691 97.755 2 Singapore 33,529 95.923 4 Malaysia 5,364 84.217 14 China 2,639 75.769 23 Japan 39,578 71.354 27 Thailand 2,698 69.001 30 India 837 63.596 35 Indonesia 1,206 59.499 42 Philippines 1,410 59.271 43
  • 15.
    2004-2012 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2011 2012 USA 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Singapore 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 Hong Kong 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 China 6 8 5 4 4 6 6 Malaysia 4 6 6 5 5 4 4 Japan 5 4 4 6 6 7 7 Thailand 7 5 8 9 7 8 8 India 8 9 7 7 8 9 9 South Korea 9 7 9 8 9 5 5 Philippines 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 Indonesia 11 11 11 11 11 10 10
  • 18.
  • 19.
    – – • –
  • 20.
    % Advanced economies Emerging and developing economies : (IMF) : 2010
  • 21.
    C u rren t A c c o u n t B a la n c e s , U S $ B n 900 D e ve lo p in g A s ia + N IE s 600 Japan 300 0 E u ro p e a n U n io n -3 0 0 -6 0 0 U n ite d S ta te s -9 0 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 : (IMF) : 2010
  • 22.
    (Public Debt) – – • (Wealth) (Income) –
  • 23.
    G- Advanced G- Emerging Low Income : Fiscal Affair Department Data, IMF
  • 24.
    2007 607 12.5 GDP Roach, D. 2007) • – 109% 1980 316% 2005 – 140
  • 25.
    • The LiquidityPyramid – Global liquidity by source of Claim (2009) 976% of 81% of Derivatives Liquidity World GDP 145% of Securitize 12% of World d Debt Liquidity GDP 80% of Bank 6% of World Loans Liquidity Powe GDP 7% of r 1% of Mone World y Liquidity GDP
  • 26.
    (spot, forward, and swaps) 3.2 • (OTC) 2.1 (BIS 2007) • (World trade volume) 12
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Chart 14 Number ofphysical RTAs that entered into force since 2000 18 160 16 140 14 120 12 100 Cumulative number Number per year 10 80 8 60 6 40 4 20 2 0 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source: WTO Secretariat.
  • 34.
    ASEAN Economic Integration Chart II.2 ASEAN ‘Noodle Bowl’ Pakistan China Japan SAFTA India APTA Nepal Bhutan Bangladesh Rep. Korea Afghanistan Sri Lanka Maldives Laos Chinese Indonesia Taipei Bahrain Qatar THAILAND Cambodia Hong Kong, Jordan Myanmar China BIMSTEC Macao, China Philippines ASEAN (AFTA, AEC) Viet Nam Ukraine Malaysia EFTA Singapore EU Brunei TRANS-PACIFIC TPP SEP Chile Peru Australia New Zealand US Panama Mexico Canada NAFTA Bloc-to-bloc or bloc-to-country Country-to-country Under negotiation SAFTA = South Asian Free Trade Agreement; APTA = Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (previously known as Bangkok Agreement, negotiated under UN-ESCAP); BIMSTEC = Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (under negotiation); AFTA = ASEAN Free Trade Area; AEC = ASEAN Economic Community (under negotiation); Trans-Pacific SEP = Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement; NAFTA = North American Free Trade Agreement; TPP = Trans-Pacific Partnership (under negotiation) Source: Data from Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Agreements Database (APTIAD, www.unescap.org/tid/aptiad/), [July 2011]. Graphic adapted from an original by Mia Mikic. See Mikic, Mia (2009), ASEAN and Trade Integration, UN ESCAP Staff Working Paper 01/09, 8 April. Some agreements are not included.
  • 35.
    AEC 2015: • (Single market and production base) • (Improved regional competitiveness) • (Regional economic development equity •
  • 36.
    24 25 2627 28 58 58 58 58 58 ( ) 60 1 .3 1 .3 1 .0 1 .0 2 .4 0 2 5 8 0 65 7.3 8.3 1 .5 1 .1 1 .2 0 3 5 80 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.9 3.8
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
    ? 39
  • 40.
    ? Ethan Biode ol) isel) 1. 3. 2. 4. 5.
  • 41.
    Supply Demand) ) • • • • 41 Yield) •
  • 42.
  • 44.
    - 24 58 25 50 25 58 26 58 27 50 6. 51 6 . 4 6 . 8 7 . 5 7 . 6 60 89 06 06 ( ) 1- 6 . 5 68 6. 72 6. 71 6. 38 6. 29 5( 9 ) 60 1. 04 1. 08 1. 42 2. 12 2. 27 ( ) 72 73 75 77 na
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
    • • FTA • ACFTA
  • 48.
    TFP - - - - -
  • 50.
  • 51.
    • • • Social safety net
  • 52.
  • 53.
    • • • (Physical Infrastructure) Soft Infrastructure ICT •
  • 54.
    • • FDI •
  • 55.
    • • JTEPA