The document discusses competition law in India. It provides background on the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which was India's first competition law. This was replaced by the landmark Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to promote competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure freedom of trade.
OLA was accused of abusing its dominant position and entering into anti-competitive agreements in the Delhi-NCR radio taxi market. Mega Cabs alleged that OLA used predatory pricing, discounts, and incentives to eliminate competition. However, the CCI ruled in favor of OLA, finding that OLA did not abuse its dominant position or enter into anti-competitive agreements in violation of the Competition Act.
Anti competitive agreements under the competition actAltacit Global
The document discusses anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act in India. It covers what the Act prohibits, including anti-competitive arrangements between businesses like cartels that fix prices or allocate markets. Horizontal agreements between competitors like price fixing are prohibited. Vertical agreements between businesses at different levels can also restrict competition. The Indian Contract Act also addresses restrictive agreements but has exceptions for reasonable restraints like non-compete clauses for outgoing business partners. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition for consumer welfare while preventing monopolies formed through anti-competitive collusion.
Competition Act 2002, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Anti Competitive Agreement, Abuse of Dominant Position, Combination, Competition Commission of India
The document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts from the Competition Act 2002 in India. It defines terms like agreement, enterprise, consumer, abuse of dominance, anti-competitive agreements, combinations, and horizontal and vertical agreements. It explains provisions around prohibition of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also summarizes rules around combinations, including notification requirements and waiting periods.
This presentation discusses cartels in India under the Competition Act 2002. It defines cartels and outlines their treatment in Sections 2 and 3 of the Act. Notable cases where cartels were found include those in the soda ash and cement industries. Joint ventures are exempt if they improve efficiency. Suggestions include better detecting small cartels through more regulatory units. In conclusion, the Competition Commission of India has stronger powers than its predecessor to address anticompetitive cartels.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is responsible for enforcing competition laws and preventing anti-competitive practices. It was established in 2003 and became fully functional in 2009. The CCI comprises a chairperson and 2-6 members appointed by the central government. Its duties include eliminating anti-competitive practices, promoting competition, protecting consumer interests, and encouraging efficient delivery of goods and services. The CCI has powers to regulate its procedures and seek expert assistance. It establishes benches led by the chairperson or members to handle cases. In a notable case, the CCI imposed a large penalty on the BCCI for unfair practices related to IPL team ownership.
The document discusses the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and prohibit anti-competitive practices. It was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive activities and promote fair competition for consumers and businesses. The key objectives of both acts were to ensure competition in the market and protect consumer interests.
The document discusses competition law in India. It provides background on the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which was India's first competition law. This was replaced by the landmark Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to promote competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure freedom of trade.
OLA was accused of abusing its dominant position and entering into anti-competitive agreements in the Delhi-NCR radio taxi market. Mega Cabs alleged that OLA used predatory pricing, discounts, and incentives to eliminate competition. However, the CCI ruled in favor of OLA, finding that OLA did not abuse its dominant position or enter into anti-competitive agreements in violation of the Competition Act.
Anti competitive agreements under the competition actAltacit Global
The document discusses anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act in India. It covers what the Act prohibits, including anti-competitive arrangements between businesses like cartels that fix prices or allocate markets. Horizontal agreements between competitors like price fixing are prohibited. Vertical agreements between businesses at different levels can also restrict competition. The Indian Contract Act also addresses restrictive agreements but has exceptions for reasonable restraints like non-compete clauses for outgoing business partners. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition for consumer welfare while preventing monopolies formed through anti-competitive collusion.
Competition Act 2002, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Anti Competitive Agreement, Abuse of Dominant Position, Combination, Competition Commission of India
The document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts from the Competition Act 2002 in India. It defines terms like agreement, enterprise, consumer, abuse of dominance, anti-competitive agreements, combinations, and horizontal and vertical agreements. It explains provisions around prohibition of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also summarizes rules around combinations, including notification requirements and waiting periods.
This presentation discusses cartels in India under the Competition Act 2002. It defines cartels and outlines their treatment in Sections 2 and 3 of the Act. Notable cases where cartels were found include those in the soda ash and cement industries. Joint ventures are exempt if they improve efficiency. Suggestions include better detecting small cartels through more regulatory units. In conclusion, the Competition Commission of India has stronger powers than its predecessor to address anticompetitive cartels.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is responsible for enforcing competition laws and preventing anti-competitive practices. It was established in 2003 and became fully functional in 2009. The CCI comprises a chairperson and 2-6 members appointed by the central government. Its duties include eliminating anti-competitive practices, promoting competition, protecting consumer interests, and encouraging efficient delivery of goods and services. The CCI has powers to regulate its procedures and seek expert assistance. It establishes benches led by the chairperson or members to handle cases. In a notable case, the CCI imposed a large penalty on the BCCI for unfair practices related to IPL team ownership.
The document discusses the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to prevent concentration of economic power and prohibit anti-competitive practices. It was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive activities and promote fair competition for consumers and businesses. The key objectives of both acts were to ensure competition in the market and protect consumer interests.
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969 aims to ensure fair competition in India and prevent concentration of economic power. It prohibits monopolistic, restrictive, and unfair trade practices. The Act gives the MRTP Commission authority to investigate complaints around such practices, issue orders to stop them, and compensate parties suffering losses. It also allows the central government to regulate production and fix terms for monopolies to prevent harm to competition. The Act has been amended over time to better control monopolies and regulate restrictive or unfair trade practices in India.
The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant position by enterprises, and regulates combinations (mergers and acquisitions) that are likely to cause an adverse effect on competition in India. It aims to promote fair competition in the market for the benefit of consumers. The key features of the Act include defining anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position, regulating combinations, and establishing penalties for non-compliance.
The Competition Act of 2002 establishes a Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade. It defines key terms like acquisition, agreement, cartel, enterprise, and prohibits anti-competitive agreements that limit production or supply or determine purchase/sale prices. It also prohibits abuse of dominant position by imposing unfair prices or limiting markets. Mergers and acquisitions are considered combinations if they meet certain asset or turnover thresholds for the involved enterprises.
this ppt is very much useful for the students pursuing First year in B.COM for the Company Law subject. Specially the students of Saurashtra University.
Income tax authorities under Income tax act 1961Chirantan Tiwari
The document summarizes the key income tax authorities in India and their roles and responsibilities.
The main authorities are:
1) The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which is responsible for policy and administration of direct taxes.
2) Income tax officers, tax recovery officers, and inspectors who handle assessments, collections, and enforcement.
3) The CBDT, directors general, commissioners, and joint commissioners can appoint other tax authorities and delegate powers.
4) The jurisdiction and powers of tax authorities are determined by the CBDT through orders and directions.
The document outlines the presentation given by Kalpeshkumar L. Gupta on the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It provides definitions of key terms related to competition law like cartel and discusses provisions of the Competition Act of 2002 regarding anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It also summarizes the regulatory framework around combinations and filing requirements to notify CCI of proposed mergers, acquisitions and other deals.
MRTP Act 1969 and Competition Act 2002Chanda Singh
The document compares the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to control monopolies and restrictive trade practices, while the Competition Act aims to promote competition and protect consumer interests. It established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive conduct and regulate combinations. Some key differences are that the Competition Act explicitly defines anti-competitive offenses and regulates combinations, while the MRTP Act was more complex and reactive.
The document discusses the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 1999 which replaced the earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). FEMA aims to facilitate external trade and payments. It is applicable to all of India and branches/offices of Indian residents abroad. FEMA was enacted due to India's liberalized EXIM policy, increased foreign investment, reserves, and WTO commitments. It regulates capital account transactions through the Reserve Bank of India and dealings in foreign exchange.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was established in 1988 as an interim administration body and given statutory powers in 1992 through the SEBI Act. SEBI is chaired by C B Bhave and is responsible for regulating the securities market and protecting investors. SEBI's objectives include regulating stock exchanges, controlling insider trading, and protecting investors. It undertakes regulatory functions like registering intermediaries and developmental functions like investor education. SEBI has guidelines for primary and secondary markets and regulates foreign institutional investors. It faces challenges from cross-border trading and demanding investors.
The document discusses competition law and anti-competitive agreements in India. It provides a history of cartels being prohibited in ancient times. It summarizes several international cartel cases involving vitamins, elevators, airlines, and car glass where companies fixed prices, shared markets, and were fined billions of dollars. The document outlines India's Competition Act of 2002 which prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It describes the roles and powers of the Competition Commission of India in investigating cartels and imposing penalties and relief measures.
The document summarizes the statutory basis and key provisions of foreign exchange regulation in India. [1] The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and subsequent Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 form the statutory basis for regulating foreign exchange. [2] FEMA aims to consolidate and amend foreign exchange laws to facilitate trade and maintain an orderly foreign exchange market. [3] Key provisions of FEMA include regulating capital account and current account transactions, duties of authorized foreign exchange dealers, penalties for non-compliance, and establishment of authorities to enforce the act.
This document discusses four measures that countries use to stop dumping of goods: tariff duties, import quotas, import embargoes, and voluntary export restraints. It explains how each measure works to increase the price of imported goods or restrict their quantity. However, the conclusion argues that these anti-dumping measures may actually harm rather than help the countries that adopt them, as domestic producers pressure governments to restrict competition from better quality, cheaper imported goods by claiming they are dumped.
The document summarizes the evolution of competition law in India. It discusses how the Competition Act of 2002 was enacted to establish a new competition regime in India and replace the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP) of 1969. The Competition Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It regulates combinations/mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India was established in 2003 to promote fair competition in the country.
The FEMA (1999) or in short FEMA has been introduced as a replacement for earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA)
FEMA came into act on the 1st day of June,2000
49 sections in the Act.
The document discusses the appointment, roles, and removal of company directors. It states that directors serve as trustees, agents, and partners. They are responsible for administering the company and making policy decisions. Directors can be appointed through election, board nomination, government nomination, or share qualifications. They can be removed by shareholders, government order, or courts. The document outlines the powers and responsibilities of directors in managing company affairs according to law.
A PRESENTATION ON COMPETITION ACT, 2002 WITH RECENT AMENDEMENTS. PRESENTED BY MADHUSUDAN NARAYA, STUDENT OF MBA AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DUGAPUR, WEST BENGAL.
THIS TOPIC IS NECESSARY FOR MARKETING PEOPLE AND THE SLIDE CONTAINS THE CASES ALSO !!
The document discusses the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It provides an overview of the Act's key features including regulations around anti-competitive practices, abuse of dominance, and mergers and acquisitions. It also describes the role of Competition Advocacy and the initiatives taken by the Competition Commission of India to promote awareness. Finally, it outlines 4 case studies that the Commission has reviewed related to alleged violations of the Act, such as a hospital accused of restricting patient choice or bid rigging among manufacturers.
The document provides an overview of India's foreign trade, including its composition, direction, and the country's foreign trade policy. It discusses the major commodity sectors for India's exports and imports. It also examines the direction of India's foreign trade in terms of key trading partners and groups. The document then outlines India's foreign trade policy framework, including the objectives and highlights of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020. It discusses the legal framework governing foreign trade and various committees that have shaped trade policy. Finally, it provides context on FERA and its replacement by FEMA in regulating foreign exchange transactions in India.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some of the main points covered include:
- The Act established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote fair competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade.
- It replaced the MRTP Act of 1969 to address the needs of the modern globalized economy. The new Act defined competition concepts, regulated combinations, and gave the Commission penalty powers.
- The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates combinations. It established procedures for investigation and imposed penalties for non-compliance.
- Case studies demonstrate how the Commission has evaluated allegations of abuse of dominance,
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some of the main points covered include:
1. The Competition Act was introduced to replace the MRTP Act of 1969 and establish the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to promote fair competition in the market.
2. It aims to prevent anti-competitive practices like price fixing, bid rigging, exclusive dealing etc. and prohibits abuse of dominant market position.
3. Mergers and acquisitions are regulated under the Act to ensure they do not negatively impact competition.
4. CCI has powers to investigate anti-competitive complaints and impose penalties on violations. Its duties include protecting consumer interests and ensuring freedom of
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969 aims to ensure fair competition in India and prevent concentration of economic power. It prohibits monopolistic, restrictive, and unfair trade practices. The Act gives the MRTP Commission authority to investigate complaints around such practices, issue orders to stop them, and compensate parties suffering losses. It also allows the central government to regulate production and fix terms for monopolies to prevent harm to competition. The Act has been amended over time to better control monopolies and regulate restrictive or unfair trade practices in India.
The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant position by enterprises, and regulates combinations (mergers and acquisitions) that are likely to cause an adverse effect on competition in India. It aims to promote fair competition in the market for the benefit of consumers. The key features of the Act include defining anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position, regulating combinations, and establishing penalties for non-compliance.
The Competition Act of 2002 establishes a Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade. It defines key terms like acquisition, agreement, cartel, enterprise, and prohibits anti-competitive agreements that limit production or supply or determine purchase/sale prices. It also prohibits abuse of dominant position by imposing unfair prices or limiting markets. Mergers and acquisitions are considered combinations if they meet certain asset or turnover thresholds for the involved enterprises.
this ppt is very much useful for the students pursuing First year in B.COM for the Company Law subject. Specially the students of Saurashtra University.
Income tax authorities under Income tax act 1961Chirantan Tiwari
The document summarizes the key income tax authorities in India and their roles and responsibilities.
The main authorities are:
1) The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which is responsible for policy and administration of direct taxes.
2) Income tax officers, tax recovery officers, and inspectors who handle assessments, collections, and enforcement.
3) The CBDT, directors general, commissioners, and joint commissioners can appoint other tax authorities and delegate powers.
4) The jurisdiction and powers of tax authorities are determined by the CBDT through orders and directions.
The document outlines the presentation given by Kalpeshkumar L. Gupta on the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It provides definitions of key terms related to competition law like cartel and discusses provisions of the Competition Act of 2002 regarding anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It also summarizes the regulatory framework around combinations and filing requirements to notify CCI of proposed mergers, acquisitions and other deals.
MRTP Act 1969 and Competition Act 2002Chanda Singh
The document compares the MRTP Act of 1969 and the Competition Act of 2002 in India. The MRTP Act aimed to control monopolies and restrictive trade practices, while the Competition Act aims to promote competition and protect consumer interests. It established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive conduct and regulate combinations. Some key differences are that the Competition Act explicitly defines anti-competitive offenses and regulates combinations, while the MRTP Act was more complex and reactive.
The document discusses the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 1999 which replaced the earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). FEMA aims to facilitate external trade and payments. It is applicable to all of India and branches/offices of Indian residents abroad. FEMA was enacted due to India's liberalized EXIM policy, increased foreign investment, reserves, and WTO commitments. It regulates capital account transactions through the Reserve Bank of India and dealings in foreign exchange.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was established in 1988 as an interim administration body and given statutory powers in 1992 through the SEBI Act. SEBI is chaired by C B Bhave and is responsible for regulating the securities market and protecting investors. SEBI's objectives include regulating stock exchanges, controlling insider trading, and protecting investors. It undertakes regulatory functions like registering intermediaries and developmental functions like investor education. SEBI has guidelines for primary and secondary markets and regulates foreign institutional investors. It faces challenges from cross-border trading and demanding investors.
The document discusses competition law and anti-competitive agreements in India. It provides a history of cartels being prohibited in ancient times. It summarizes several international cartel cases involving vitamins, elevators, airlines, and car glass where companies fixed prices, shared markets, and were fined billions of dollars. The document outlines India's Competition Act of 2002 which prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It describes the roles and powers of the Competition Commission of India in investigating cartels and imposing penalties and relief measures.
The document summarizes the statutory basis and key provisions of foreign exchange regulation in India. [1] The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and subsequent Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 form the statutory basis for regulating foreign exchange. [2] FEMA aims to consolidate and amend foreign exchange laws to facilitate trade and maintain an orderly foreign exchange market. [3] Key provisions of FEMA include regulating capital account and current account transactions, duties of authorized foreign exchange dealers, penalties for non-compliance, and establishment of authorities to enforce the act.
This document discusses four measures that countries use to stop dumping of goods: tariff duties, import quotas, import embargoes, and voluntary export restraints. It explains how each measure works to increase the price of imported goods or restrict their quantity. However, the conclusion argues that these anti-dumping measures may actually harm rather than help the countries that adopt them, as domestic producers pressure governments to restrict competition from better quality, cheaper imported goods by claiming they are dumped.
The document summarizes the evolution of competition law in India. It discusses how the Competition Act of 2002 was enacted to establish a new competition regime in India and replace the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP) of 1969. The Competition Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It regulates combinations/mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India was established in 2003 to promote fair competition in the country.
The FEMA (1999) or in short FEMA has been introduced as a replacement for earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA)
FEMA came into act on the 1st day of June,2000
49 sections in the Act.
The document discusses the appointment, roles, and removal of company directors. It states that directors serve as trustees, agents, and partners. They are responsible for administering the company and making policy decisions. Directors can be appointed through election, board nomination, government nomination, or share qualifications. They can be removed by shareholders, government order, or courts. The document outlines the powers and responsibilities of directors in managing company affairs according to law.
A PRESENTATION ON COMPETITION ACT, 2002 WITH RECENT AMENDEMENTS. PRESENTED BY MADHUSUDAN NARAYA, STUDENT OF MBA AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DUGAPUR, WEST BENGAL.
THIS TOPIC IS NECESSARY FOR MARKETING PEOPLE AND THE SLIDE CONTAINS THE CASES ALSO !!
The document discusses the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It provides an overview of the Act's key features including regulations around anti-competitive practices, abuse of dominance, and mergers and acquisitions. It also describes the role of Competition Advocacy and the initiatives taken by the Competition Commission of India to promote awareness. Finally, it outlines 4 case studies that the Commission has reviewed related to alleged violations of the Act, such as a hospital accused of restricting patient choice or bid rigging among manufacturers.
The document provides an overview of India's foreign trade, including its composition, direction, and the country's foreign trade policy. It discusses the major commodity sectors for India's exports and imports. It also examines the direction of India's foreign trade in terms of key trading partners and groups. The document then outlines India's foreign trade policy framework, including the objectives and highlights of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020. It discusses the legal framework governing foreign trade and various committees that have shaped trade policy. Finally, it provides context on FERA and its replacement by FEMA in regulating foreign exchange transactions in India.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some of the main points covered include:
- The Act established the Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote fair competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade.
- It replaced the MRTP Act of 1969 to address the needs of the modern globalized economy. The new Act defined competition concepts, regulated combinations, and gave the Commission penalty powers.
- The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates combinations. It established procedures for investigation and imposed penalties for non-compliance.
- Case studies demonstrate how the Commission has evaluated allegations of abuse of dominance,
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some of the main points covered include:
1. The Competition Act was introduced to replace the MRTP Act of 1969 and establish the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to promote fair competition in the market.
2. It aims to prevent anti-competitive practices like price fixing, bid rigging, exclusive dealing etc. and prohibits abuse of dominant market position.
3. Mergers and acquisitions are regulated under the Act to ensure they do not negatively impact competition.
4. CCI has powers to investigate anti-competitive complaints and impose penalties on violations. Its duties include protecting consumer interests and ensuring freedom of
The document provides an overview of competition law in India under the Competition Act of 2002. It discusses the history and objectives of competition law in India, including replacing the MRTP Act of 1969. It then summarizes key aspects of the Competition Act such as regulations around anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market position, and merger control. It also discusses trends in enforcement of the act, including sectors investigated, types of complaints received, and penalties imposed.
1. Competition between organizations provides benefits like promoting growth, advancing civilization, and forcing creativity, but can also lead to anti-competitive practices.
2. The Competition Act of 2002 was established to prevent anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant market positions in India.
3. The Act prohibits anti-competitive horizontal agreements between competitors to fix prices or limit production, as well as abuse of dominant market positions by single companies.
The Competition Act, 2002 was enacted to fill gaps in the MRTP Act regarding anti-competitive practices such as abuse of dominance, cartels, bid rigging, and price fixing. It established the Competition Commission of India to prevent practices harming competition. The Act's objectives are to facilitate competition, establish the CCI, protect consumer interests, and ensure free trade in India. It covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant positions, combinations/mergers, and advocacy. Certain practices like intellectual property rights are excluded.
The document provides background information on competition law in India. It discusses how the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition after economic reforms in 1991. The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI can investigate abuse of dominant position, mergers and anticompetitive agreements. It has powers to impose penalties and recommend structural changes to enterprises.
The Competition Act, 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices in India. The CCI regulates combinations (mergers and acquisitions), prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It aims to ensure fair competition in the market for economic growth and development. Some key cases show how the CCI evaluates combinations based on factors like market share and impact on competition, and prohibits anti-competitive behaviors by dominant companies.
PPT in Company competition in India.
6th semester B.com program,
Shaheed Bhagat singh College (University of Delhi)
It is totally in Indian ACT" company's.
The document summarizes key aspects of India's competition law framework. It outlines that competition law in India was triggered by the constitution and the first law was the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969. This was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition and private enterprise.
The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India and has four main parts - regulating anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, combination regulation, and competition advocacy. It aims to facilitate competition, establish the CCI to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote market competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure trade freedom. The CCI has powers like imposing penalties, modifying or blocking combinations, and separating dominant enterprises.
The document discusses the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It provides background on competition laws in India prior to 2002. It then summarizes the key objectives and features of the Competition Act of 2002, including prohibiting anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It also discusses the components of the Act, including the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which administers the Act.
completion law 2002 FOR CA,CMA,CS ,MBA,BBA,BCOM,MCOM,,PROFESSIONAL
All businesses have a duty to act lawfully, but there are more practical reasons why compliance with competition law is particularly important.
On a broad level, the main aim of competition law is to ensure that markets remain competitive
• The Competition Act, 2002 was passed to encourage competition in markets in India.
• The Competition Act broadly covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance and regulation of combinations.
• During combinations, i.e mergers or takeovers, the businesses of the transferor and transferee are to be studies from the point of view of anti-trust aspects(i.e Comeptition aspects). This process is competition law due diligence.
• Competition law due diligence involves examination of various agreements, check into the companies dominace and its’ abuse if any
The document provides an introduction to the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It summarizes that the Act was introduced to replace the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969 by establishing a new competition regulatory authority. The Act aims to prevent anti-competitive practices like anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions while regulating combinations/mergers. It also seeks to encourage competition advocacy to promote a culture of competition in India's economic policies and laws.
The Competition Act, 2002 aims to promote fair competition in India and protect consumer interests. It replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969. The key objectives of the Competition Act are to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between companies, abuse of dominant market position, and regulates combinations/mergers above certain financial thresholds. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the competition laws and regulations in the country.
The Competition Act of 2002 established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote competition. The CCI is tasked with investigating anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market positions, and mergers and acquisitions. Parties to a combination are not required to notify the CCI, but the CCI can investigate combinations on its own. The CCI faces challenges due to overlapping jurisdictions, unrealistic timelines, lack of cooperation from foreign counterparts, and limited resources and infrastructure.
The Competition Act of 2002 aims to ensure fair competition in markets and protect consumer interests over firm size. It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to eliminate anti-competitive practices, promote competition, and regulate combinations (mergers and acquisitions). The CCI, headed by a High Court judge, may pass orders directing firms to discontinue anti-competitive agreements or practices, impose penalties up to 10% of turnover, and approve or reject combinations. Its orders are enforceable like High Court orders, and appeals go to the Supreme Court. The Competition Amendment Bill of 2007 set up the Competition Appellate Tribunal as a quasi-judicial body to hear CCI appeals.
The document discusses competition and competition policy in India. It defines competition as situations in markets where sellers strive for buyers to achieve business goals. Competition policy aims to promote efficiency and maximize welfare. The Competition Act of 2002 established a commission to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumers, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It regulates combinations and promotes competition advocacy. The Commission has powers like issuing cease/desist orders and imposing penalties.
This document provides an overview of bid rigging and competition law in India. It defines bid rigging as competitors coordinating their bids to ensure either a higher price or lower quality wins the contract. It outlines different types of anticompetitive agreements prohibited under the Competition Act 2002 such as tie-in, exclusive distribution, and exclusive supply agreements. It also discusses the powers and duties of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, inquiring into anticompetitive practices, and advocating for competition.
The document discusses India's legal environment for business and competition law. It provides an overview of India's transition from a command economy to a more liberalized market, including the introduction of the Competition Act of 2002. The Act aims to promote fair competition in India and established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI regulates mergers and acquisitions, abuse of dominance, and monitors anti-competitive agreements. It can impose penalties on firms found violating the Act.
The document provides an overview of India's Competition Act of 2002. It discusses the objective of establishing the Competition Commission of India to promote fair competition and protect consumers. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between companies and abuse of dominant market positions. It also regulates mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India enforces the Act and works to advocate for competition through non-enforcement measures like education programs. The Act has been amended over time to address challenges in its implementation and continue meeting India's evolving economic needs regarding fair competition.
The document discusses competition law and policy in India, noting that competition law aims to promote economic efficiency and consumer welfare by preventing anti-competitive practices like cartels and abuse of dominance, and regulating mergers and acquisitions. It also explains how various government policies around sectors like trade, industry and economic regulation should be reformed to promote more competition. The Competition Commission of India is established as the primary regulator to enforce competition law and investigate anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and mergers and acquisitions.
Similar to Important provisions of competition act, 2002 (20)
The document discusses how prioritizing employees over customers leads to better business outcomes. It notes that organizations that focus too much on customer satisfaction experience high employee turnover and disengagement. This hurts customer satisfaction and business growth over time. Instead, the document advocates treating employees well by paying market rates, trusting them to solve problems, and not overworking them. It provides an example of HCL Technologies, which follows an "Employees First, Customers Second" approach to greater success. In summary, the key message is that happy employees through fair treatment and empowerment will in turn create happy customers and business growth.
The document discusses the concept of possession under jurisprudence. It defines possession as physical control over an object combined with the intention to exercise that control. There are two essential elements of possession: corpus (physical power over the object) and animus (intention to exclude others). Possession can be classified as corporeal or incorporeal, mediate or immediate, de facto or de jure, and constructive or adverse. The document also discusses definitions of possession provided by various jurists and analyzes the 1851 case Bridges v. Hawkesworth regarding the rule of finders-keepers.
An FIR (First Information Report) is a written document containing the earliest information about the commission of a cognizable offense. It must be filed with the police station in the jurisdiction where the offense took place. An FIR can be filed by the aggrieved person, an eyewitness, or anyone with hearsay information about the offense. It aims to set the criminal law into motion by providing essential details like what crime was committed, who committed it, where and when it took place, and any other relevant information or witnesses. If the police refuse to record an FIR, the complainant can escalate the matter to higher authorities or file a private complaint with the court.
In this PPT various kinds of Writs have been discussed along with the relevant case laws. Also, relevant article such as Art 32 and Art 226 of the Indian Constitution have been explained.
Indian mobile market – competative analysisShubham Madaan
The document discusses smartphone usage statistics globally and in India. It provides rankings of the top 10 countries by number of smartphone users, with China in the top spot. For India specifically, it lists the top 5 smartphone companies as Xiaomi, Samsung, Vivo, Oppo, and Realme, with Chinese brands comprising 50% of the Indian market share. It also notes Samsung, Apple, and OnePlus as the leading premium smartphone brands in India.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
2. Background of Competition Laws
• Post 1991 policy of Liberalisation, Privatisation and Globalisation
introduced.
• MRTP Act was found inadequate to meet the challenges of a modern
globalized economy.
• Government of India in October 1999 appointed a high level Committee on
Competition Policy and Law (the Raghavan Committee) to advise on the
competition law in consonance with international developments.
3. The Competition Act, 2002
• Acting on the report of the Committee, the Government of India passed the
Competition Act in the year 2002; to which the President accorded assent in
2003. It was subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act,
2007.
• The broad objectives of the Competition Act, as laid down in its preamble,
are:
• “to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition, to promote and
sustain competition in markets, to protect the interest of the consumers and
to ensure freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets in
India”
4. Legal Framework of Competition Act, 2002;
in India
• The Framework of Competition Act 2002 has essentially four compartments:
1. Anti- Competitive Agreements [ Section 3]
2. Abuse of Dominance [ Section 4]
3. Combination Regulation [ Section 5 & 6]
4. Competition Advocacy [ Section 49]
5. Salient Features of the Competition Act,
2002
• Facilitate & Foster Competition
• Establish a Commission to prevent practices having adverse effect on
competition
• Promote and sustain competition in markets
• Protect the interests of consumers
• Ensure freedom of trade in the Indian markets
6. Anti-competitive Agreements [Section 3]
• Any agreement for goods or services which has appreciable adverse effect
on competition in India is prohibited. These kinds of agreements are known
as anti-competitive agreements.
• Anti competitive agreement of entered into shall be void.
• Section 3 of the Act states that no enterprise shall enter into:
• 1. Any agreement With respect to production, supply distribution, storage,
acquisition or control of goods/provision of services which is anti-
competitive is prohibited and void.
• 2. Such agreements must cause or be likely to cause appreciable adverse
effect on competition (AAEC) in a relevant market in India.
7. Kinds of Agreements
• There are Two kinds of agreements
1. Horizontal agreements
2. Vertical agreements.
8. Horizontal Agreements
• They are Agreements Between Parties in the same line of production.
Example - Agreement between Manufactures, Agreement between
Distributors.
• Horizontal agreements are presumed to have AAEC if they:
1. Directly or indirectly determine purchase or sale prices
2. Limit or control output, technical development, services etc.
3. Share or divide markets
4. Indulge in rigging or collusive bidding
9. Vertical Agreements
• Vertical agreement are those agreements between Non-Competition
undertaking operating at different levels of manufacturing and distribution
process.
• EX- , the agreement between manufacturers of components , manufactures
of products, between producers and whole- sellers or between producers,
whole sellers and retailers.
• They are prohibited if such agreements cause or are likely to cause AAEC.
11. Abuse of Dominant position (Section 4)
• It means a position of strength, enjoyed by an enterprise, in the relevant
market in India, which enables it to:
1. • Operate independently of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant
market or,
2. • affects its competitors or consumers of the relevant market in its favor
• Enterprise or group shall not abuse its dominant position. Agreement by
enterprise or group abusing its dominant position is prohibited.
12. • An Enterprise or group is said to have abused its dominant position if it
directly or indirectly:
• Imposes unfair condition or price
• Predatory pricing
• Limit or restrict :
1. Production of goods or provision of services or market
2. Technical or scientific development relating to goods or services
3. Creating barriers to entry
4. Denying of market access
5. Uses its dominant position in one market to gain advantage in other market
• Where there is abuse of dominant position then the CCI will issue the
following orders Under Section 27 And Section 28
13. Regulation of Combination (Section 5 & 6)
• What is Combination ?
• The Acquisition of one or more enterprise by way of merger or amalgamation
or control over enterprise is regarded as combination.
• A Combination is an acquisition of one or more enterprises by one or more
persons, merger or amalgamation of enterprises, if it meets the prescribed
monetary thresholds and involves:
1. • Any acquisition of control, shares, voting rights or assets of any enterprise
2. • Any acquisition of control by a person over an enterprise, where such
person already has direct/indirect control over another enterprise in a
similar business.
3. • Any merger or amalgamation of enterprises.
14. • Combinations above the defined monetary thresholds require filing
and prior approval of the CCI before they can be made effective.
CCI has powers to investigate combinations and modify/reject
them.
• Separate provisions exist in case of acquisitions pursuant to loan/
investment agreements of public financial institutions, FII, banks or
VC funds.
• The CCI must be notified within 30 days of the ‘trigger event’ of
such combinations.
• Any combination which has an adverse effect on competition
can be declared void by the CCI.
15. Competition Advocacy [Sec 49]
• Central government may obtain opinion of CCI on the possible effect of the
policy on competition while formulating competition policy
• On receipt of deference, commission is required to give its opinion to central
Government within 60days
• The role of commission is advisory
• Opinion given by commission is not binding upon the central Government.
• The commission has also been assigned the role to take following suitable
measured for:
o Promotion of competition advocacy
o Creating awareness about competition
o Imparting Training about competition issue.
Greetings one and all, today I shubham Madaan of BBALLB 6A will be discusiing with you all important provisions of Competition Act 2002,
After the passing of LPG policy by the Pm Manmohan singh Mrtp Act which was MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT (MRTP), 1969 was found to inadequate to meet the challenges of a modern globalized economy.