Competition Act 2002, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Anti Competitive Agreement, Abuse of Dominant Position, Combination, Competition Commission of India
The document outlines the presentation given by Kalpeshkumar L. Gupta on the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It provides definitions of key terms related to competition law like cartel and discusses provisions of the Competition Act of 2002 regarding anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It also summarizes the regulatory framework around combinations and filing requirements to notify CCI of proposed mergers, acquisitions and other deals.
Competition is the best means of ensuring that the ‘Common Man’ or ‘Aam Aadmi’ has access to the broadest range of goods and services at the most competitive prices. With increased competition, producers will have maximum incentive to innovate and specialize. This would result in reduced costs and wider choice to consumers. A fair competition in market is essential to achieve this objective. Our goal is to create and sustain fair competition in the economy that will provide a ‘level playing field’ to the producers and make the markets work for the welfare of the consumers
A PRESENTATION ON COMPETITION ACT, 2002 WITH RECENT AMENDEMENTS. PRESENTED BY MADHUSUDAN NARAYA, STUDENT OF MBA AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DUGAPUR, WEST BENGAL.
THIS TOPIC IS NECESSARY FOR MARKETING PEOPLE AND THE SLIDE CONTAINS THE CASES ALSO !!
The document discusses competition law in India. It provides background on the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which was India's first competition law. This was replaced by the landmark Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to promote competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure freedom of trade.
OLA was accused of abusing its dominant position and entering into anti-competitive agreements in the Delhi-NCR radio taxi market. Mega Cabs alleged that OLA used predatory pricing, discounts, and incentives to eliminate competition. However, the CCI ruled in favor of OLA, finding that OLA did not abuse its dominant position or enter into anti-competitive agreements in violation of the Competition Act.
Presentation on The competition act(2002)satya pal
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses the objectives of eliminating anti-competitive practices and promoting fair competition. The main features covered are the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements such as cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulations governing mergers and acquisitions. Enforcement is carried out by the Competition Commission of India through investigations and imposition of penalties. The act aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure fair competition in the market.
The FEMA (1999) or in short FEMA has been introduced as a replacement for earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA)
FEMA came into act on the 1st day of June,2000
49 sections in the Act.
The document summarizes the statutory basis and key provisions of foreign exchange regulation in India. [1] The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and subsequent Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 form the statutory basis for regulating foreign exchange. [2] FEMA aims to consolidate and amend foreign exchange laws to facilitate trade and maintain an orderly foreign exchange market. [3] Key provisions of FEMA include regulating capital account and current account transactions, duties of authorized foreign exchange dealers, penalties for non-compliance, and establishment of authorities to enforce the act.
The document outlines the presentation given by Kalpeshkumar L. Gupta on the Competition Commission of India (CCI). It provides definitions of key terms related to competition law like cartel and discusses provisions of the Competition Act of 2002 regarding anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It also summarizes the regulatory framework around combinations and filing requirements to notify CCI of proposed mergers, acquisitions and other deals.
Competition is the best means of ensuring that the ‘Common Man’ or ‘Aam Aadmi’ has access to the broadest range of goods and services at the most competitive prices. With increased competition, producers will have maximum incentive to innovate and specialize. This would result in reduced costs and wider choice to consumers. A fair competition in market is essential to achieve this objective. Our goal is to create and sustain fair competition in the economy that will provide a ‘level playing field’ to the producers and make the markets work for the welfare of the consumers
A PRESENTATION ON COMPETITION ACT, 2002 WITH RECENT AMENDEMENTS. PRESENTED BY MADHUSUDAN NARAYA, STUDENT OF MBA AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DUGAPUR, WEST BENGAL.
THIS TOPIC IS NECESSARY FOR MARKETING PEOPLE AND THE SLIDE CONTAINS THE CASES ALSO !!
The document discusses competition law in India. It provides background on the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969, which was India's first competition law. This was replaced by the landmark Competition Act of 2002, which established the Competition Commission of India to promote competition and prevent anti-competitive practices. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. It aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure freedom of trade.
OLA was accused of abusing its dominant position and entering into anti-competitive agreements in the Delhi-NCR radio taxi market. Mega Cabs alleged that OLA used predatory pricing, discounts, and incentives to eliminate competition. However, the CCI ruled in favor of OLA, finding that OLA did not abuse its dominant position or enter into anti-competitive agreements in violation of the Competition Act.
Presentation on The competition act(2002)satya pal
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses the objectives of eliminating anti-competitive practices and promoting fair competition. The main features covered are the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements such as cartels, abuse of dominant market positions, and regulations governing mergers and acquisitions. Enforcement is carried out by the Competition Commission of India through investigations and imposition of penalties. The act aims to protect consumer welfare and ensure fair competition in the market.
The FEMA (1999) or in short FEMA has been introduced as a replacement for earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA)
FEMA came into act on the 1st day of June,2000
49 sections in the Act.
The document summarizes the statutory basis and key provisions of foreign exchange regulation in India. [1] The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and subsequent Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 form the statutory basis for regulating foreign exchange. [2] FEMA aims to consolidate and amend foreign exchange laws to facilitate trade and maintain an orderly foreign exchange market. [3] Key provisions of FEMA include regulating capital account and current account transactions, duties of authorized foreign exchange dealers, penalties for non-compliance, and establishment of authorities to enforce the act.
The document discusses the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 1999 which replaced the earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). FEMA aims to facilitate external trade and payments. It is applicable to all of India and branches/offices of Indian residents abroad. FEMA was enacted due to India's liberalized EXIM policy, increased foreign investment, reserves, and WTO commitments. It regulates capital account transactions through the Reserve Bank of India and dealings in foreign exchange.
The document provides an overview of key concepts in Indian partnership law under the Indian Partnership Act of 1932. It defines a partnership as an agreement between two or more persons to share profits from a business carried on by them. The main types of partnerships covered are partnership at will (indefinite term) and particular partnership (fixed term or venture). Rights and duties of partners as well as ways partnerships can be formed, dissolved, or partners can join/retire are also summarized. Key points include unlimited liability of partners, consent needed for new partners/dissolution, and various contingencies like death or insolvency that can dissolve a partnership.
In the context of a company, the word ‘meeting’ implies
The coming together of a certain number of members;
For transacting the business in the agenda;
For which a previous notice has been issued.
The document discusses articles of association (AOA), which contain the internal rules and regulations of a company for the benefit of shareholders. AOA must be registered for certain types of companies and usually deal with matters like shareholder rights, board meetings, and resolutions. AOA can be altered by special resolution but cannot contradict the memorandum of association or companies act. The doctrine of indoor management protects outsiders dealing with companies by assuming they have constructive notice of AOA contents, with some exceptions. AOA are subordinate to the memorandum of association and govern internal company relations.
Promoters are individuals who conceive of and organize the formation of a new company. They take on important preliminary responsibilities like drafting founding documents, recruiting initial shareholders and directors, and facilitating the legal registration of the company. Promoters occupy a fiduciary role and are therefore prohibited from making secret profits or failing to disclose material facts about transactions between themselves and the company.
The document discusses the various income tax authorities in India according to the Income Tax Act. It outlines the central authorities like the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which is responsible for tax policy and administration. Below the CBDT are various officers like Directors General, Commissioners, Deputy/Assistant Commissioners, and Income Tax Officers who have powers to assess taxes, conduct searches and seizures, and investigate tax evasion. Their roles, appointment processes, and jurisdictions are explained. Key powers of authorities like the CBDT, Commissioners and Income Tax Officers are also summarized.
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
The document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts from the Competition Act 2002 in India. It defines terms like agreement, enterprise, consumer, abuse of dominance, anti-competitive agreements, combinations, and horizontal and vertical agreements. It explains provisions around prohibition of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also summarizes rules around combinations, including notification requirements and waiting periods.
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) was enacted in 1969 to prevent concentration of economic power and monopolistic/restrictive trade practices. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate such practices and grant injunctions/compensation. The Act defined monopolistic, restrictive, and unfair trade practices and was amended several times before provisions around concentration of economic power were repealed in 1991. The MRTP Commission had investigation powers like a civil court along with remedies under the Act.
Anti competitive agreements under the competition actAltacit Global
The document discusses anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act in India. It covers what the Act prohibits, including anti-competitive arrangements between businesses like cartels that fix prices or allocate markets. Horizontal agreements between competitors like price fixing are prohibited. Vertical agreements between businesses at different levels can also restrict competition. The Indian Contract Act also addresses restrictive agreements but has exceptions for reasonable restraints like non-compete clauses for outgoing business partners. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition for consumer welfare while preventing monopolies formed through anti-competitive collusion.
The document discusses the key aspects of a contract of sale under Indian law. It begins by defining a contract of sale and differentiating between a sale and an agreement to sell. It then covers the essential elements of a valid contract of sale, implied conditions and warranties, caveat emptor, and how the transfer of property occurs. Specifically, it examines how property is transferred for unascertained goods, specific goods, and goods sold on approval. The document provides a comprehensive overview of contract of sale with examples to illustrate important legal concepts.
The document provides an overview of the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881. It defines key terms like negotiable instrument and discusses the characteristics of negotiable instruments. It outlines the three main types of negotiable instruments - promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. For each type, it provides examples and discusses their essential elements. It also compares and contrasts promissory notes and bills of exchange, and discusses additional qualifications for cheques. Finally, it covers topics like crossing of cheques and the different types of crossing.
PPT in Company competition in India.
6th semester B.com program,
Shaheed Bhagat singh College (University of Delhi)
It is totally in Indian ACT" company's.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is responsible for enforcing competition laws and preventing anti-competitive practices. It was established in 2003 and became fully functional in 2009. The CCI comprises a chairperson and 2-6 members appointed by the central government. Its duties include eliminating anti-competitive practices, promoting competition, protecting consumer interests, and encouraging efficient delivery of goods and services. The CCI has powers to regulate its procedures and seek expert assistance. It establishes benches led by the chairperson or members to handle cases. In a notable case, the CCI imposed a large penalty on the BCCI for unfair practices related to IPL team ownership.
Dr. P. Ravichandran has listed his academic and professional qualifications. He provides information on the different heads of income under the Income Tax Act, including salary, house property, business/profession, capital gains, and other sources. He notes that income is first computed under these heads and then adjustments are made for set-off losses before determining total income. The document then focuses on income from salary, providing details on what constitutes salary and allowable deductions. It discusses various forms of retirement benefits like leave encashment, gratuity, pension, and their tax treatment.
The document provides an overview of key concepts related to companies under the Companies Act 2013 in India. It defines a company and its key characteristics such as separate legal entity, perpetual succession, and common seal. It outlines different types of companies and how they are formed, including requirements for the memorandum and articles of association. It also discusses prospectuses, shares and share capital, allotment of shares, members' rights and duties, types of company meetings, and winding up of companies.
The document discusses various aspects of winding up a company in India. It defines winding up as the process by which a company is dissolved and its assets realized to pay debts. There are three main types of winding up: compulsory by tribunal, members' voluntary, and creditors' voluntary. The tribunal can order compulsory winding up for reasons like inability to pay debts or acting against public interest. Voluntary winding up involves shareholder or creditor resolutions. Winding up has consequences like stay of legal proceedings and responsibility of directors to submit company records to the tribunal or liquidator.
Losses can be set off against income of the same year or carried forward to future years to offset income. Set off of losses occurs either intra-head, where losses of one source offset income of another source within the same head, or inter-head, where losses offset income across different heads. Strict rules govern which losses can offset which incomes both currently and when carried forward. House property losses can be carried forward 8 years against house property income, while long term capital losses can only offset long term capital gains.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or a third party. In a contract of guarantee, a surety promises to be liable if a principal debtor defaults. There are three parties in a guarantee - the surety, principal debtor, and creditor. The surety has secondary liability while the principal debtor has primary liability. The document outlines rights and liabilities of parties, types of guarantees, essentials of valid contracts, and circumstances for discharge of liability.
The Competition Act 2002 aims to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade in India. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It regulates combinations (mergers, acquisitions, amalgamations) that cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market. Enterprises are prohibited from entering into anti-competitive agreements and abusing dominant positions. Combinations above certain financial thresholds require approval from the Competition Commission of India.
The document discusses the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) of 1999 which replaced the earlier Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). FEMA aims to facilitate external trade and payments. It is applicable to all of India and branches/offices of Indian residents abroad. FEMA was enacted due to India's liberalized EXIM policy, increased foreign investment, reserves, and WTO commitments. It regulates capital account transactions through the Reserve Bank of India and dealings in foreign exchange.
The document provides an overview of key concepts in Indian partnership law under the Indian Partnership Act of 1932. It defines a partnership as an agreement between two or more persons to share profits from a business carried on by them. The main types of partnerships covered are partnership at will (indefinite term) and particular partnership (fixed term or venture). Rights and duties of partners as well as ways partnerships can be formed, dissolved, or partners can join/retire are also summarized. Key points include unlimited liability of partners, consent needed for new partners/dissolution, and various contingencies like death or insolvency that can dissolve a partnership.
In the context of a company, the word ‘meeting’ implies
The coming together of a certain number of members;
For transacting the business in the agenda;
For which a previous notice has been issued.
The document discusses articles of association (AOA), which contain the internal rules and regulations of a company for the benefit of shareholders. AOA must be registered for certain types of companies and usually deal with matters like shareholder rights, board meetings, and resolutions. AOA can be altered by special resolution but cannot contradict the memorandum of association or companies act. The doctrine of indoor management protects outsiders dealing with companies by assuming they have constructive notice of AOA contents, with some exceptions. AOA are subordinate to the memorandum of association and govern internal company relations.
Promoters are individuals who conceive of and organize the formation of a new company. They take on important preliminary responsibilities like drafting founding documents, recruiting initial shareholders and directors, and facilitating the legal registration of the company. Promoters occupy a fiduciary role and are therefore prohibited from making secret profits or failing to disclose material facts about transactions between themselves and the company.
The document discusses the various income tax authorities in India according to the Income Tax Act. It outlines the central authorities like the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which is responsible for tax policy and administration. Below the CBDT are various officers like Directors General, Commissioners, Deputy/Assistant Commissioners, and Income Tax Officers who have powers to assess taxes, conduct searches and seizures, and investigate tax evasion. Their roles, appointment processes, and jurisdictions are explained. Key powers of authorities like the CBDT, Commissioners and Income Tax Officers are also summarized.
Competition Law awareness and enforcement are increasing day by day. Long-term, sustainable growth of big organization, corporation and companies warrants attention to competition law while strategising their growth.
The document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts from the Competition Act 2002 in India. It defines terms like agreement, enterprise, consumer, abuse of dominance, anti-competitive agreements, combinations, and horizontal and vertical agreements. It explains provisions around prohibition of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also summarizes rules around combinations, including notification requirements and waiting periods.
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) was enacted in 1969 to prevent concentration of economic power and monopolistic/restrictive trade practices. It established the MRTP Commission to investigate such practices and grant injunctions/compensation. The Act defined monopolistic, restrictive, and unfair trade practices and was amended several times before provisions around concentration of economic power were repealed in 1991. The MRTP Commission had investigation powers like a civil court along with remedies under the Act.
Anti competitive agreements under the competition actAltacit Global
The document discusses anti-competitive agreements under the Competition Act in India. It covers what the Act prohibits, including anti-competitive arrangements between businesses like cartels that fix prices or allocate markets. Horizontal agreements between competitors like price fixing are prohibited. Vertical agreements between businesses at different levels can also restrict competition. The Indian Contract Act also addresses restrictive agreements but has exceptions for reasonable restraints like non-compete clauses for outgoing business partners. The Competition Act aims to promote fair competition for consumer welfare while preventing monopolies formed through anti-competitive collusion.
The document discusses the key aspects of a contract of sale under Indian law. It begins by defining a contract of sale and differentiating between a sale and an agreement to sell. It then covers the essential elements of a valid contract of sale, implied conditions and warranties, caveat emptor, and how the transfer of property occurs. Specifically, it examines how property is transferred for unascertained goods, specific goods, and goods sold on approval. The document provides a comprehensive overview of contract of sale with examples to illustrate important legal concepts.
The document provides an overview of the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881. It defines key terms like negotiable instrument and discusses the characteristics of negotiable instruments. It outlines the three main types of negotiable instruments - promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques. For each type, it provides examples and discusses their essential elements. It also compares and contrasts promissory notes and bills of exchange, and discusses additional qualifications for cheques. Finally, it covers topics like crossing of cheques and the different types of crossing.
PPT in Company competition in India.
6th semester B.com program,
Shaheed Bhagat singh College (University of Delhi)
It is totally in Indian ACT" company's.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is responsible for enforcing competition laws and preventing anti-competitive practices. It was established in 2003 and became fully functional in 2009. The CCI comprises a chairperson and 2-6 members appointed by the central government. Its duties include eliminating anti-competitive practices, promoting competition, protecting consumer interests, and encouraging efficient delivery of goods and services. The CCI has powers to regulate its procedures and seek expert assistance. It establishes benches led by the chairperson or members to handle cases. In a notable case, the CCI imposed a large penalty on the BCCI for unfair practices related to IPL team ownership.
Dr. P. Ravichandran has listed his academic and professional qualifications. He provides information on the different heads of income under the Income Tax Act, including salary, house property, business/profession, capital gains, and other sources. He notes that income is first computed under these heads and then adjustments are made for set-off losses before determining total income. The document then focuses on income from salary, providing details on what constitutes salary and allowable deductions. It discusses various forms of retirement benefits like leave encashment, gratuity, pension, and their tax treatment.
The document provides an overview of key concepts related to companies under the Companies Act 2013 in India. It defines a company and its key characteristics such as separate legal entity, perpetual succession, and common seal. It outlines different types of companies and how they are formed, including requirements for the memorandum and articles of association. It also discusses prospectuses, shares and share capital, allotment of shares, members' rights and duties, types of company meetings, and winding up of companies.
The document discusses various aspects of winding up a company in India. It defines winding up as the process by which a company is dissolved and its assets realized to pay debts. There are three main types of winding up: compulsory by tribunal, members' voluntary, and creditors' voluntary. The tribunal can order compulsory winding up for reasons like inability to pay debts or acting against public interest. Voluntary winding up involves shareholder or creditor resolutions. Winding up has consequences like stay of legal proceedings and responsibility of directors to submit company records to the tribunal or liquidator.
Losses can be set off against income of the same year or carried forward to future years to offset income. Set off of losses occurs either intra-head, where losses of one source offset income of another source within the same head, or inter-head, where losses offset income across different heads. Strict rules govern which losses can offset which incomes both currently and when carried forward. House property losses can be carried forward 8 years against house property income, while long term capital losses can only offset long term capital gains.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or a third party. In a contract of guarantee, a surety promises to be liable if a principal debtor defaults. There are three parties in a guarantee - the surety, principal debtor, and creditor. The surety has secondary liability while the principal debtor has primary liability. The document outlines rights and liabilities of parties, types of guarantees, essentials of valid contracts, and circumstances for discharge of liability.
The Competition Act 2002 aims to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests and ensure freedom of trade in India. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It regulates combinations (mergers, acquisitions, amalgamations) that cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market. Enterprises are prohibited from entering into anti-competitive agreements and abusing dominant positions. Combinations above certain financial thresholds require approval from the Competition Commission of India.
The document provides an overview of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It discusses key aspects of the Act including its objectives to prevent anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominance. It outlines the prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also covers the regulation of combinations or mergers and acquisitions as well as the thresholds for notification. The document proposes some amendments to the Act including increasing pre-merger consultation and notification timelines.
Here are my analyses of the situations described in the question:
(i) Yes, this amounts to an anti-competitive agreement as it restricts the territory of sale for the distributor, limiting competition.
(ii) Yes, this amounts to resale price maintenance, which is considered an anti-competitive vertical agreement under the Competition Act.
(iii) Yes, this agreement restricts the dealer from dealing in competing products, limiting competition.
(iv) No, this agreement relating to ensuring quality of exports would not be considered anti-competitive as it falls under the exception for agreements increasing efficiency.
(v) Yes, this agreement restricting the purchaser from acquiring goods from others would amount to an anti
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It begins with an introduction explaining the objectives and background of shifting from the MRTP Act to the Competition Act. It then defines important terms and outlines the key parts of the Act, including prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, regulation of combinations, the role and powers of the Competition Commission of India, and penalties for violations. In summary, the Competition Act aims to promote fair competition in India and prevent anti-competitive business practices that could harm consumers or the broader economy.
The document discusses key aspects of the Competition Act 2002 in India. It outlines provisions related to anti-competitive agreements (Section 3), abuse of dominant position (Section 4), and combinations (Section 5 and 6). It defines concepts like cartels, bid rigging, tie-in agreements, exclusive supply/distribution agreements, and refusal to deal. It provides examples of abuses of dominant position like predatory pricing. The purpose of the Act is to prevent anti-competitive practices and promote fair competition for benefit of consumers.
The document provides background information on competition law in India. It discusses how the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) of 1969 was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition after economic reforms in 1991. The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to prevent anti-competitive practices. The CCI can investigate abuse of dominant position, mergers and anticompetitive agreements. It has powers to impose penalties and recommend structural changes to enterprises.
The document discusses the Competition Act of 2002 in India. It provides background on competition laws in India prior to 2002. It then summarizes the key objectives and features of the Competition Act of 2002, including prohibiting anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It also discusses the components of the Act, including the Competition Commission of India (CCI) which administers the Act.
The document discusses the importance of competition and the need for competition laws when global trade is taking place on a single platform. It notes that India enacted the Competition Act 2002 to establish a new competition regime and foster competition in markets after economic reforms in 1991 made the previous MRTP Act inadequate. The Act aims to eliminate anti-competitive practices and promote competition for the benefit of consumers.
The document summarizes India's Competition Act of 2002. The Act aims to promote fair competition in the market and protect consumer interests. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements between businesses like price fixing. It also prevents abuse of dominant market positions. The Act regulates mergers and acquisitions that could reduce competition. Review of combinations is subject to thresholds based on company turnover to encourage business growth. The Competition Commission of India enforces the Act and ensures open competition.
The Competition Act, 2002 aims to promote fair competition in India and protect consumer interests. It replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969. The key objectives of the Competition Act are to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements between companies, abuse of dominant market position, and regulates combinations/mergers above certain financial thresholds. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the competition laws and regulations in the country.
The Competition Act of 2002 establishes a Competition Commission of India to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure freedom of trade. It defines key terms like acquisition, agreement, cartel, enterprise, and prohibits anti-competitive agreements that limit production or supply or determine purchase/sale prices. It also prohibits abuse of dominant position by imposing unfair prices or limiting markets. Mergers and acquisitions are considered combinations if they meet certain asset or turnover thresholds for the involved enterprises.
completion law 2002 FOR CA,CMA,CS ,MBA,BBA,BCOM,MCOM,,PROFESSIONAL
All businesses have a duty to act lawfully, but there are more practical reasons why compliance with competition law is particularly important.
On a broad level, the main aim of competition law is to ensure that markets remain competitive
• The Competition Act, 2002 was passed to encourage competition in markets in India.
• The Competition Act broadly covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance and regulation of combinations.
• During combinations, i.e mergers or takeovers, the businesses of the transferor and transferee are to be studies from the point of view of anti-trust aspects(i.e Comeptition aspects). This process is competition law due diligence.
• Competition law due diligence involves examination of various agreements, check into the companies dominace and its’ abuse if any
The document discusses competition and competition policy in India. It defines competition as situations in markets where sellers strive for buyers to achieve business goals. Competition policy aims to promote efficiency and maximize welfare. The Competition Act of 2002 established a commission to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote competition, protect consumers, and ensure freedom of trade. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions. It regulates combinations and promotes competition advocacy. The Commission has powers like issuing cease/desist orders and imposing penalties.
The Competition Act 2002 aims to prevent anti-competitive practices in India. It establishes the Competition Commission of India to regulate anti-competitive agreements between enterprises, abuse of dominant position by enterprises, and mergers and acquisitions. The Act aims to promote economic efficiency and protect consumer interests while ensuring fairness in market transactions.
The document provides an overview of competition law in India under the Competition Act of 2002. It discusses the history and objectives of competition law in India, including replacing the MRTP Act of 1969. It then summarizes key aspects of the Competition Act such as regulations around anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant market position, and merger control. It also discusses trends in enforcement of the act, including sectors investigated, types of complaints received, and penalties imposed.
The document summarizes key aspects of India's competition law framework. It outlines that competition law in India was triggered by the constitution and the first law was the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969. This was replaced by the Competition Act of 2002 to promote competition and private enterprise.
The Competition Act established the Competition Commission of India and has four main parts - regulating anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, combination regulation, and competition advocacy. It aims to facilitate competition, establish the CCI to prevent anti-competitive practices, promote market competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure trade freedom. The CCI has powers like imposing penalties, modifying or blocking combinations, and separating dominant enterprises.
Chandigarh_Judicial_Academy_ 16th May 2015 FinalSUKESH MISHRA
This document provides an overview of competition law in India. It discusses the historical background of Indian competition law from the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969 to the current Competition Act of 2002. It describes key aspects of the Competition Act such as its objectives, coverage, definitions of agreements and enterprises, and prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position. It also summarizes some important cases that the Competition Commission of India has dealt with related to horizontal agreements, vertical restraints, and abuse of dominance.
The document provides an overview of the Competition Act of 2002 in India. Some key points:
- The Act aims to promote fair competition in the market and protect consumer interests by prohibiting anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant market positions.
- It established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to investigate anti-competitive practices and regulate combinations (mergers and acquisitions).
- The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant positions, and combinations that negatively impact competition. It replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act of 1969.
- Key concepts defined include cartels, enterprises, persons, relevant markets, and what constitutes anti-competitive agreements and abuse of
This document provides an overview of bid rigging and competition law in India. It defines bid rigging as competitors coordinating their bids to ensure either a higher price or lower quality wins the contract. It outlines different types of anticompetitive agreements prohibited under the Competition Act 2002 such as tie-in, exclusive distribution, and exclusive supply agreements. It also discusses the powers and duties of the Competition Commission of India in regulating combinations, inquiring into anticompetitive practices, and advocating for competition.
The document provides an overview of key concepts related to consumer protection in India under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, including definitions of terms like "consumer", "complaint", "consumer rights", and "unfair trade practice". It summarizes new provisions introduced in the 2019 Act related to aspects like online transactions, product liability, endorsement of goods/services, and the role of the Central Consumer Protection Authority.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002ramandeepjrf
The document summarizes key aspects of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 in India. It defines key terms like money laundering, proceeds of crime, and scheduled offences. It outlines the 3 stages of money laundering: placement, layering, and integration. It describes the obligations of banking companies, financial institutions, and intermediaries to report transactions and verify identities. It discusses the attachments, adjudications, and confiscation process as well as the roles of the Adjudicating Authority, Appellate Tribunal, and Special Courts in enforcing the law. Punishments are outlined for money laundering and for providing false information.
Collecting Banker: Duties, Statutory Protection and Concept of Negligence, Position of a Collecting Banker, Duties and Responsibilities of Collecting Banker,Statutory Protection to Collecting Banker, Holder
and
Holder in Due Course
Delivery Channels and Inter Bank Payment System, E-Payments, Types of Electronic Fund Transfer system, Real Time Gross Settlement,National Electronics Funds Transfer ,Immediate Payment Service, Credit Card, Automatic Teller Machine, Smart Card, E-Money, E- Wallet, E-Cheque
Internet banking allows customers to perform banking activities through the internet rather than visiting a branch in person. It offers convenience through anytime, anywhere access on a personal computer. Key features include fast and efficient transactions using digital processing. Banks benefit through reduced costs, increased customer base and risk reduction while customers benefit from prompt service, time savings and more convenience. Delivery channels for e-banking include CBS, ATMs, smart cards and online services like bill payment, shopping, trading and fund transfers. However, issues like security, infrastructure costs, user awareness and unauthorized access pose limitations. Common models are complete centralized solution and cluster approach.
This document defines and explains endorsement of negotiable instruments. It begins by defining endorsement as signing over the right to receive payment from a negotiable instrument to another person. It then discusses the key parties in an endorsement - the endorser who signs and the endorsee in whose favor it is made. The document outlines the essential requirements for a valid endorsement and various legal provisions and rules regarding endorsement. It concludes by defining and explaining the different types of endorsements including blank, special, conditional, restrictive, sans recourse, facultative, forged, and partial endorsements.
Securities and exchange board of india act 1992ramandeepjrf
The document provides details about the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). It discusses that prior to SEBI, securities markets were regulated by various acts. SEBI was established in 1992 as a statutory regulator for securities markets in India with its headquarters in Mumbai. The key functions of SEBI include protecting investors, regulating securities markets, and promoting the development of markets. It has powers to investigate and take action against entities not complying with its regulations. Appeals against SEBI orders can be made to the Securities Appellate Tribunal.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
3. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade
Practices Act, 1969
• Government of India in April, 1964 appointed a Commission
under the chairmanship of Justice K.C. Das Gupta to determine
the extent and effect of monopolies in the Indian Market.
• The Commission submitted its report on 31st October, 1965.
• On 27th December 1969, The MRTP Bill received the assent from
the President,
• The MRTP Act was intended to curb the rise of monopolistic
Practices.
5. Issues in MRTP Act, 1969
• Post 1991 reforms did not prohibit merger, amalgamation and
takeovers in MRTP Act. Many private and public sector companies
were brought under the ambit of MRTPAct.
• The MRPT act didn’t even include certain offending trade
practices, which are restrictive in nature like- Abuse of
Dominance, Cartels, Collusion and Price Fixing, Bid Rigging
and Predatory Pricing.
6. Establishment of Competition Act, 2002
Considering all the issues of MRTP Act 1969, a need
for change in the act arises.
In October 1999 GOI appointed a committee under
Mr. S V S Raghavan.
Committee submitted the report in May 2000 and
parliament passed the new law in December 2002
named “The Competition Act, 2002.
7. Indian Competition Act, 2002
• The Competition Act, 2002 replaced ‘The Monopolies and
Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969’
• Extends to whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir.
• The provisions of the Competition Act relating to anti
competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position
were notified on May 20, 2009.
• Competition Commission of India (CCI) was established to
prevent activities that has an adverse effect of
competition in India.
9. Applicability of the Act
• This act applies to whole of India except in Jammu
& Kashmir.
• All enterprises whether private, public or
government but does not include- the activities
of central government dealing in Security, Atomic
energy, Currency, Defense and Space.
10. Objectives of the Act
• to prevent practices having adverse effect on
competition
• to promote and sustain competition in markets
• to protect the interests of consumers
• to ensure freedom of trade carried on by other
participants in markets in India
12. Main provision of Competition Act
Competition Act,
2002
Abuse of
Dominant
Position
Regulatiion and
Combination
Prohibition
of Certain
Agreements
Prohibition of
14. Acquisition (Section 2(a))
"Acquisition" means, directly or indirectly,
acquiring or agreeing to acquire—
(i) shares, voting rights or assets of any
enterprise; or
(ii) control over management or control over
assets of any enterprise;
15. Agreement [Section 2(b)]
"Agreement" includes any arrangement or
understanding or action in concert,—
(i) whether or not, such arrangement, understanding
or action is formal or in writing; or
(ii) whether or not such arrangement, understanding
or action is intended to be enforceable by legal
proceedings.
17. Horizontal Agreement
Horizontal agreements are those agreements among
competitors operating at the same level in the
economic process i.e. enterprises engaged in the
same activity.
Example: The agreements between producers or
between wholesalers or between retailers,
dealing in similar kind of products.
18. Vertical Agreements
Vertical agreements are those agreements between
Non-competing undertakings operating at different
levels of manufacturing and distribution process.
Example:- The agreements between producers and whole-
sellers or between producers, whole-sellers and retailers.
19. Cartel [Section 2(c)]
"Cartel" includes an association of producers,
sellers, distributors, traders or service
providers who, by agreement amongst
themselves, limit, control or attempt to control
the production, distribution, sale or price of,
or, trade in goods or provision of services.
20. Consumer (Section 2f)
‘consumer’ means any person who buys any goods for
a consideration, which has been paid or promised or
partly paid and partly promised, whether such
purchase of goods is for resale or for any commercial
purpose or for personal use.
Even a person purchasing goods for resale or for any
commercial purpose will also be considered as a
‘consumer’.
21. Goods [Section 2(i)]
"Goods" means goods as defined in the Sale of
Goods Act, 1930 and includes—
(A) products manufactured, processed or mined;
(B) debentures, stocks and shares after allotment;
(C) goods imported into India.
23. Anti Competitive Agreement
Any agreement which is having appreciable
adverse effect on competition (AAEC) will
be termed as anti-competitive agreement.
24. Anti Competitive Agreement
Any agreement entered into b/w enterprises or associations of enterprises shall be
presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition (AAEC),
which—
(a) directly or indirectly determines purchase or sale prices;
(b) limits or controls production, supply, markets, technical development,
investment or provision of services;
(c) shares the market or source of production or provision of services by way of
allocation of geographical area of market, or type of goods or services, or
number of customers or any other similar way;
(d) directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusive bidding.
27. Case
• Jet Airways, IndiGo and Spicejet together were accused of
concerted actions in fixing and revising Fuel Surcharge
(FSC) for Transporting Cargo.
• CCI imposed fines of Rs 258 Crores, on them for contravening
Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002
• According to CCI, such anti-competitive ways in the air cargo
industry have a detriment effect on end-consumers and
undermines economic development of the country.
28. Agreement at different stages in different markets
1. Tie- up Agreement:
Condition to purchase one good for purpose of buying another good.
2. Exclusive Supply Agreement:
Putting condition on purchaser not to buy goods from another person.
3. Exclusive Distribution Agreement:
Putting condition not to sale goods beyond particular local limit,
municipal limit etc. i.e. putting condition on area of distribution.
29. Types of Anti Competitive Agreement
4. Refusal to Deal:
Putting condition restraining to deal with any particular person.
5. Resale Price Maintenance:
Putting condition for maintaining minimum price for sale. In
other words minimum price below which goods cannot be sold.
31. Restriction of rights under some Acts
Nothing contained in this section shall restrict the right of any person to
impose reasonable conditions for protecting any of his rights under—
(a) the Copyright Act, 1957;
(b) the Patents Act, 1970;
(c) the Trade Marks Act, 1999;
(d) the Geographical Indications of Goods Act, 1999;
(e) the Designs Act, 2000;
(f) the Semi-conductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000;
33. Abuse of Dominant Position
There shall be abuse of dominant position if an enterprise or a
group-
(a) directly or indirectly, imposes unfair or discriminatory—
(i) condition in purchase or sale of goods or services; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price)
of goods or service, or
34. Abuse of Dominant Position
(b) limits or restricts—
(i) production of goods or provision of services or
market; or
(ii) technical or scientific development relating to
goods or services to the prejudice of consumers; or
(c) indulges in practice or practices resulting in denial of
market access in any manner; or
35. (d) makes conclusion of contracts which, by their
nature or according to commercial usage, have no
connection with the subject of such contracts; or
(e) uses its dominant position in one relevant market
to enter into, or protect, other relevant market.
Abuse of Dominant Position
36. Factors determining Dominant position
The Dominant position will be determined by
-Market share :
-Size and resources :
-Size and importance of competition;
-Economic power including commercials advantages over competitions;
-vertical integration;
-dependence of consumers;
-Monopoly (dominant position due to Statue)
37. Factors determining Dominant position
-entry barriers including barriers such as
regulatory barriers,
high capital cost of entry,
marketing entry barriers,
technical entry barriers,
economies of scale;
-countervailing buying power;
-market structure and size of market;
39. Combination
The acquisition of one or more enterprises
by one or more persons or merger or
amalgamation of enterprises shall be a
combination of such enterprises and
persons or enterprises,
40. Type of
combination
vertical combination occurs
When a firm acquires another
firm which produces raw
materials used by it or getting
closer to the customer.
Example
• Tyre manufacturer acquires
rubber manufacturer,
• Car manufacturer acquires
a steel company,
• FMCG company acquiring
an advertising company or a
retailing outlet etc.
Horizontal combination
occurs when to two firms
operating in same industry
combining together.
• Acquisition of Times
Bank by HDFC Bank,
• Bank of Madura by
ICICI Bank,
• Kotak Mahindra Bank
by ING Vysya Bank.
Conglomerate combination
occurs when two firms
operating in industries
unrelated to each other.
• A watch manufacturing
company acquiring a
cement manufacturer,
• A steel manufacturer
acquiring
a software company etc.
Example Example
43. Exception in Section 5 of Combination
As per notification if a company being acquired does not
exceed-
Assets of 350 crores
or
Turnover of 1000 Crores
In that case it is exempt from Requirement of Section 5
(combination)
45. Competition Commission of India (CCI)
It’s a Body corporate established by Central Government.
FUNCTIONS -
• Protect interest of consumers.
• To control practices against competition
• Promote competition
• Ensure freedom of Trade
46. Composition of Commission [Section 8]
The Commission shall consist of the
Chairperson and not less than 2 and not
more than 6 other Members, to be appointed
by the Central Government.
47. Qualification
He/she shall be a person of ability, integrity and
standing and
He/she has been or is qualified to be a Judge of a
High Court or has special knowledge and
professional experience of not less than 15 years in
International trade, economics, business, commerce,
law, finance, accountancy, management etc.
49. Term of office for CCI
• Maximum 5 Years
• Can be re-appointed for any number of times
• Maximum age of 65 years.
• Casual Vacancy of Chairperson by death, resignation or otherwise:
the senior-most Member shall act as the Chairperson.
• When the Chairperson is unable to discharge his functions: owing
to absence, illness or any other cause, the senior-most Member
shall discharge the functions of the chairperson.
50. Powers of Commission
Inquire into anti competitive and abuse of dominant position
Determine whether agreements has any adverse effect on competition
Examine whether combination has any adverse effect on competition
Granting interim relief as would be necessary in a particular case
Imposing Fines and Penalties
Awarding Compensation
Order Division of dominant undertaking or demerger
51. Resignation, removal and suspension of Chairperson
and other members [Section 11]
(a) is, or at any time has been, adjudged as an insolvent; or
(b) has engaged during his term of office, in any paid employment, or
(c) has been convicted of an offence involves moral turpitude; or
(d) has acquired such financial or other interest as functions as a
Member; or
(e) has so abused his position prejudicial to the public interest; or
(f) has become physically or mentally incapable of acting as a
Member.
52. Powers of Commission to impose Penalty
• Cease and desist order
• Impose penalty up to 10% of turnover of the average of the
turnover for the last 3 preceding financial years.
• In case of cartel, penalty can be 10% of turnover or 3 times of
profit illegally gained from cartel activity, whichever is higher.
• Recommend to Government the division of dominant
Enterprise.
53. Director General to investigate contravention
• Appointed
investigation, proceedings of enquiries
by Central Government for
in
relation to matters which are referred by the
CCI.
is made on the basis of
ability, knowledge and field
• Appointment
outstanding
experience
54. Penalty for contravention of orders of Commission and
Director General
• Penalty for failure to comply with directions of
Commission and Director General –
The Commission may impose on such person a
penalty of rupees 1 lakh for each day during
which such failure continues, subject to a
maximum of rupees one crore.
55. • Power to impose penalty for non-furnishing of
information on combinations –
The Commission shall impose on such person or
enterprise a penalty which may extend to 1% of
the total turnover or the assets, whichever is
higher, of such a combination.
56. • Penalty for making false statement or omission
to furnish material information –
sSch person shall be liable to a penalty which shall
not be less than rupees 50 lakhs but which may
extend to rupees one crore, as may be determined
by the Commission.
57. Chairperson
Two other
members
appointed by CG
Competition Appellate Tribunal
Composition & Qualification
Shall be the Judge of the
Supreme Court or theChief
Justice of a High Court
A Person of integrity and standard
having professional experience of
not less than 25 Years in
competition matters
58. Appeal Process in Tribunal
Person Aggrieved
File an appealwithin
60 days of receipt of
the order
Tribunal may
entertain the
appeal even
after 60 days if
it thinks fit
Tribunal has to close
the appeal within 6
months timeframe
Tribunal may
entertain the
appeal even
after 60 days if it
thinks fit