INTERSTITIAL
LUNG DISEASES
Prepared by -Mikru Taye C1- student-2019 GC
Moderator–Dr. Getachew Endrie (MD, Internist)
10/2/2019
1
Presentation out line
 Introduction
 Classification
 Pathogenesis
 Clinical evaluation /presentation
 Diagnosis
 Treatment
 Follow up
10/2/2019
2
Introduction
 ILDs represent a large number of conditions that
involve the parenchyma of the lung—the alveoli, the
alveolar epithelium, the capillary endothelium, and the
spaces between those structures—as well as the
perivascular and lymphatic tissues.
 The disorders in this heterogeneous group are
classified together because of similar clinical,
physiologic, radiologic or pathologic manifestations.
10/2/2019
3
Introduction
 There are more than 200 known individual diseases
 Classification
1. Those associated with predominant inflammation
and fibrosis
2. Those with a predominantly granulomatous reaction
in interstitial or vascular areas
 Each of these groups can be subdivided further
according to whether the cause is known or unknown.
 For each ILD there may be an acute phase, and there
is usually a chronic one as well.
 Rarely, some are recurrent, with intervals of
subclinical disease.
10/2/2019
4
10/2/20195
Introduction
 The most common ILDs of unknown etiology are
Sarcoidosis
IPF and
Pulmonary fibrosis associated with connective tissue
diseases.
 The most common ILDs of known etiology are those of
environmental and occupational related ILDs
 especially the inhalation of
inorganic dusts
organic dusts
various fumes or gases
10/2/2019
6
10/2/2019
7
10/2/2019
8
Pathogenesis
 The ILDs are nonmalignant disorders and are not caused
by identified infectious agents.
 The precise pathway(s) leading from injury to fibrosis is
not known.
 Although there are multiple initiating agent(s) of injury,
the immunopathogenic responses of lung tissue are
limited, and the mechanisms of repair have common
features
10/2/2019
9
Pathogenesis
 Granulomatous Lung Disease
 It is characterized by an accumulation of
➢ T lymphocytes,
➢ macrophages, and granulomasin-> in the lung
➢ epithelioid cells
 Many patients with granulomatous lung disease
remain free of severe impairment of lung function
or, when symptomatic, improve after treatment
 Main DDx: Sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity
pneumonitis
10/2/2019
10
✓ Pathogenesis
 Inflammation and Fibrosis
 Initial Insult: an injury to the epithelial surface that
causes inflammation in the air spaces and alveolar walls
 If the disease becomes chronic, inflammation spreads
to adjacent portions of the interstitium and
vasculature and eventually causes interstitial fibrosis.
 Important histopathologic patterns in these ILDs:
✓ usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP),
✓ nonspecific interstitial pneumonia,
✓ respiratory bronchiolitis
✓ diffuse alveolar damage (acute or organizing), and
✓ lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia 10/2/2019
11
10/2/201912
10/2/201913
Clinical Evaluation
 A thorough and comprehensive history may provide
invaluable information that can suggest certain entities
and provide suspicion that a patient may have a specific
diagnosis such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) or
CTD-ILD
 Additional clues to an ultimate diagnosis can be provided
by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary physical examination
findings,
10/2/2019
14
Clinical Evaluation
 The differential diagnosis can be considerably narrowed
when key elements of the patient interview and physical
examination findings are combined with appropriate
measurements of lung function, specific blood tests such
as autoimmune serologies to assist in the detection of
CTD if such are indicated, extra-pulmonary tissue
sampling (e.g. lymph node or skin biopsy), and thoracic
imaging.
10/2/2019
15
Clinical Evaluation
 History
 Progressive exertional dyspnea is the commonest
complaint.
 Some may not have dyspnea – eg Sarcoidosis
 The other is persistent non productive cough
 Chest Pain, Hemoptysis and Wheeze are uncommon
10/2/2019
16
Diagnosis
 History
 Pattern->Acute, Subacute , Chronic and/or Episodic.
 Age-> 20-40 years ,IPF older than 60yrs.
 Sex-> Mostly female.
◼ In males -> ILDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis, IPF and
Occupation related ILDs like pneumoconiosis
 Some ILDs are related with smoking.
◼ Two third to 75% of IPF and familial lung fibrosis
have history of smoking cigarette.
◼ A strict Occupational and Environmental History
10/2/2019
17
10/2/201918
10/2/201919
 P/E
 The
findings are
usually not
specific
10/2/201920
10/2/201921
10/2/201922
Diagnosis
 Radiography
 CXR findings include
◼ a bibasilar reticular pattern
◼ A nodular or mixed pattern of alveolar filling and
increased reticular markings
◼ A subgroup of ILDs exhibit nodular opacities with a
predilection for the upper lung zones [sarcoidosis,
chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, silicosis,
berylliosis, RA (necrobiotic nodular form), ankylosing
spondylitis].
 Presence of honeycomb appearance indicates poor
prognosis
10/2/2019
23
10/2/2019
24
10/2/2019
25
 Radiography
 A variety of infectious processes cause interstitial
opacities
fungal pneumonias (eg, coccidioidomycosis,
cryptococcosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii),
atypical bacterial pneumonias, and viral pneumonias.
 These infections often occur in immunocompromised
hosts
10/2/2019
26
Diagnosis
 Radiography- HRCT
 HRCT is superior to CXR in that
Early detection and confirmation of the disease
Better assessment of extent and distribution of
the lesions
Useful even in patients with normal chest
radiograph
Can better detect the presence of concomitant
condition like mediastinal adenopathy,
carcinoma…
Can preclude and be useful before lung biopsy
10/2/2019
27
 Radiography- HRCT
Certain HRCT findings help to narrow the differential
diagnosis of ILD.
 Bilateral symmetric hilar adenopathy and upper lung
zone reticular opacities suggest sarcoidosis or another
granulomatous disease
 Pleural plaques with linear calcification suggest
asbestosis
 Centrilobular nodules that spare the subpleural region
are seen in hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis,
Langerhans cell histiocytosis and also respiratory,
follicular, and cellular bronchiolitis
10/2/2019
28
❖A complete lack of pulmonary parenchymal changes on
HRCT imaging virtually excludes a diagnosis of ILD
❖But, it may rarely still be present with microscopic
involvement.
10/2/201929
 Gallium-67 lung scanning — Gallium-67 lung scanning is
of limited value as a means of evaluating patients with
ILD. We do not obtain gallium-67 lung scans in the
evaluation of patients with ILD.
 FDG-PET scanning — The role of (18)F-2-deoxy-2-
fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography
(PET) scanning in the evaluation of ILD is unclear. In a
series of 35 patients with pulmonary lymphangitic
carcinomatosis, diffuse uptake of FDG was noted in 30
patients and focal uptake in four. However, positive FDG
uptake can also be seen in sarcoidosis and pulmonary
Langerhans cell histiocytosis. We do not typically obtain
PET scans in the evaluation of ILD.
10/2/2019
30
Diagnosis
 PFT
 Most forms of ILD produce a restrictive defect with
reduced total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual
capacity, and residual volume
 FEV1 and FVC are reduced, related to the decreased
TLC
 FEV1/FVC ratio is usually normal or increased
 Lung volumes decrease as lung stiffness worsens with
disease progression
 Pulmonary function studies have been proved to have
prognostic value in patients with idiopathic interstitial
pneumonias, particularly IPF and nonspecific
interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)
10/2/2019
31
Diagnosis
 PFT
 In contrast, an interstitial pattern on chest radiograph
accompanied by obstructive airflow limitation (ie, a
reduced FEV1/FVC ratio) on lung function testing is
suggestive of any of the following processes:
➢ Sarcoidosis
➢ Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
➢ Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
➢ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis
➢ Tuberous sclerosis and pulmonary
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
➢ Combined COPD and ILD
➢ Constrictive bronchiolitis
10/2/2019
32
Diagnosis
 Diffusion Capacity
 A reduction in the diffusing capacity of the lung
for carbon monoxide (DlCO) is a common but
nonspecific finding in most ILDs
 Moderate to severe reduction of DLCO in the
presence of normal lung volumes in a patient with
ILD suggests one of the following:
◼ Combined emphysema and ILD
◼ Combined ILD and pulmonary vascular disease
◼ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis
◼ Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis
10/2/2019
33
Diagnosis
 DLCO
 Pulmonary vascular disease, and thus a reduction in
DLCO, can develop in patients with ILD as a
consequence of hypoxemic vasoconstriction,
thromboembolic disease complicating the ILD, or a
disease with both ILD and pulmonary hypertension,
such as scleroderma.
 In general, the severity of the DLCO reduction
does not correlate well with disease prognosis, unless
the DLCO is less than 35 percent of predicted
◼ Longitudinal changes in DLCO have been used to assess
disease progression or regression. Due to difficulties with
reproducibility in measuring DLCO, a change of 15 percent
is needed to identify a true change in disease severity
10/2/2019
34
Diagnosis
 Arterial Blood Gas
 Resting: May be normal or reveal hypoxemia
(secondary to a mismatching of ventilation to
perfusion) and respiratory alkalosis.
 A normal resting arterial O2 tension does not
rule out significant hypoxemia during exercise
or sleep
 Carbon dioxide (CO2) retention is rare and is
usually a manifestation of end-stage disease
10/2/2019
35
Diagnosis
 Exercise Testing
 Normal values for resting arterial partial pressure of
oxygen (PaO 2 ) or pulse O 2 saturation do not rule out
significant hypoxemia during exercise or sleep.
 Thus, it is important to perform exercise testing with
serial measurement of arterial blood gases or pulse
oximetry
 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with measurement of
arterial blood gases to detect abnormalities of gas
exchange (b/c hypoxemia may not be seen at rest)
10/2/2019
36
Diagnosis
 Exercise Testing
 Exercise testing may take the form of a
cardiopulmonary exercise test, a six-minute
walk test, or informal ambulatory oximetry
including a stair climb to replicate the
patient's usual daily activity.
10/2/2019
37
 BAL
 Virtually all patients presenting with hemoptysis and
radiographic ILD should undergo BAL promptly to
confirm an alveolar source of bleeding and identify
any infectious etiologies.
 The majority of patients with an acute onset of ILD
will undergo BAL to evaluate for acute eosinophilic
pneumonia, alveolar hemorrhage, malignancy, and
opportunistic or atypical infection, which can often
be diagnosed on the basis of BAL findings
10/2/2019
38
 BAL
 The right middle lobe or lingula of the left upper
lobe are likely the best regions
 Ground glass opacification or profuse nodular
change are more likely to provide useful diagnostic
information
 BAL fluid and sediment can be analyzed for
infection or the presence of malignant cells, and
the gross appearance of freshly retrieved BAL
fluid may provide diagnosistic information
10/2/2019
39
Disease category Examples Findings in BAL fluid
Malignancy Lymphangitic carcinomatosis Malignant cells
Bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma Malignant cells
Pulmonary lymphoma Malignant cells
Diseases due to inhaled (exogenous)
material
Lipoid pneumonia Fat globules in macrophages (oil-red-
O-stain)
Multinucleated giant cells
Asbestosis Ferruginous bodies
Silicosis Dust particles seen by polarized
microscopy
Berylliosis Positive lymphocyte transformation
test to beryllium salts
Inflammatory Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage Large numbers of erythrocytes
Hemosiderin-laden macrophages (iron
stain)
Sequential lavages progressively
more hemorrhagic
Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia Eosinophils ≥40 percent
Idiopathic acute eosinophilic
pneumonia
Eosinophils ≥25 percent
Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis Lipoproteinaceous material (periodic
acid-Schiff stain)
Pulmonary Langerhans cell
histiocytosis (Histiocytosis X)
Monoclonal antibody (T6) positive
histiocytes
CD1 positive Langerhans cells >5
percent
Birbeck granules in lavaged
macrophages (seen by electron
microscopy)
10/2/201940
High count (≥25 percent)
➢Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (≥40 percent)
➢Churg Strauss syndrome with active pneumonitis
➢Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia (≥25 percent)
➢Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (40 to 70 percent)
Mild to moderate counts (<25 percent)
➢Connective tissue disease
➢Drug-induced pneumonitis
➢Fungal pneumonia
➢Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (<10 percent)
➢Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis
➢Sarcoidosis
Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL
Eosinophilia
10/2/201941
➢Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (15 to 40 percent)
➢Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (40 to 70 percent)
➢Inorganic dust diseases
➢Asbestosis
➢Silicosis
➢Cigarette smoking (<10 percent)
➢Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Histiocytosis
X)
➢Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (acute)
➢Sarcoidosis (advanced)
Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL
Neutrophilia
10/2/201942
➢ Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (60 to 80 percent)
➢ Sarcoidosis (Acute - 40 to 60 percent)
➢ Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (15 to 30 percent)
➢ Berylliosis
➢ Granite workers
➢ Amiodarone pneumonitis
➢ Lymphoma/Pseudolymphoma
➢ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Early)
Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL
Lymphocytosis
10/2/201943
Diagnosis
 Lung biopsy is the most effective method for
confirming the diagnosis and assessing disease
activity
 Lung biopsy: 3 types
◼ Transbronchial (fibreoptic bronchoscopy)
◼ Video Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)
◼ Surgical Lung Biopsy (SLB)
 Adequate sized multiple (4-8) biopsies should be
taken from at least 2 lobes
◼ Avoid areas with extensive fibrosis*
10/2/2019
44
Diagnosis
 Lung biopsy- complications
 Open lung biopsy in patients with suspected ILD has
approximately a 4.3% 30-day mortality rate, whereas
VATS biopsy appears to be safer with an associated
30-day mortality that is somewhat lower than open
biopsy but not negligible at approximately 2.1%
 Additionally, the highest mortality risk may occur in
patients whose ultimate diagnosis is IPF
◼ And SLB in patients with IPF has been reported to trigger
an acute exacerbation of IPF
◼ However, confirming the diagnosis and differentiating among
specific forms of IIP may not be possible without
performing SLB.
10/2/2019
45
Diagnosis
 Lung Biopsy- Contraindications
 Serious cardiovascular condition
 Honeycombing
 Radiographic evidence of end stage disease
 Severe Pulmonary dysfunction
 Major operative risks eg. Elderly
10/2/2019
46
Diagnosis
 *Serology
 Usually a hypersensitivity precipitin panel like
➢anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA)
➢rheumatoid factor,
➢anti-topoisomerase and
➢anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
(ANCA)
 Esophageal Manometry & PH
 awareness of abnormal GER Vs aspiration -> ILD
10/2/2019
47
Treatment
 Although the course of ILD is variable, progression is
common and often insidious
 Therapy does not reverse fibrosis
 The major goals of treatment are
 Permanent removal of the offending agent, when
known, and
 Early identification and aggressive suppression of the
acute and chronic inflammatory process, thereby
reducing further lung damage
10/2/2019
48
Treatment
 Hypoxemia (PaO2 <55 mmHg) at rest and/or
with exercise should be managed with
supplemental oxygen.
 Management of cor pulmonale may be
required as the disease progresses
 Pulmonary rehabilitation has been shown to
improve the quality of life in patients with
ILD
10/2/2019
49
Treatment
 Immunosuppressive anti-inflammatory agents are used to
treat various forms of ILD
 Treatment of any form of ILD with immunosuppressive
therapy is off-label in the U.S. and anti-inflammatory/
immunosuppressive pharmacologic therapy has not been
validated in placebo-controlled clinical trials
 However, there is reasonably compelling evidence that the
administration of agents such as corticosteroids is
strongly associated with improvement or even clearing of
lung pathology for many forms of ILD.
10/2/2019
50
Treatment
 This is particularly the case for disorders
such as cryptogenic organizing pneumonia
(COP), eosinophilic pneumonia, sarcoidosis,
or cellular non-specific interstitial
pneumonia (NSIP)
10/2/2019
51
Treatment
 Glucocorticoids
 Steriods are the mainstay of therapy though there
has not been a clinical trial supporting it
 Prednisolol 0.5-1mg/kg once daily dosing is started
and given for 4-12 weeks and patient reevaluated
after this time.
 Then if the patient is improving it should be
tapered to 0.25-0.5mg/kg and kept for 4-12 weeks.
 If the patient’s condition declines in this period,
other agents can be added like cyclophosphamide
and azathioprine.
10/2/2019
52
Treatment
 Cyclophosphamide and azathioprine (1–2 mg/kg
lean body weight per day), with or without
glucocorticoids, have been tried with variable
success in IPF, vasculitis, progressive systemic
sclerosis, and other ILDs.
 An objective response usually requires at least
8–12 weeks to occur
 Lung transplantation can be considered for ILDs
which are chronic and irreversible despite therapy.
10/2/2019
53
Treatment
 When extensive fibrosis is present, such
therapies may be less efficacious, especially
for patients with IPF, for whom currently
available immunosuppressive or antifibrotic
therapies are not recommended
 However, some forms of CTD-associated ILD
(NSIP or UIP pathologies) have been reported
to respond to mycophenolate therapy, which
also allowed a significant lowering of
corticosteroid dosing
10/2/2019
54
Treatment
 Anti-fibrotic pharmacologic therapies are
being increasingly brought to clinical trials,
and patients should be encouraged to enroll
in clinical trials if they are found to have
IPF or other forms of advanced ILD for
which effective therapies have yet to be
identified and clinical trials for their
specific form of ILD are open to enrollment.
10/2/2019
55
Treatment
 Lung transplantation
 Lung transplantation is an accepted form of
treatment for patients with ILD that is
progressive, clearly leading to respiratory
failure, and refractory to other therapies
10/2/2019
56
Follow-up
 Measurements that can be made periodically
to objectively assess changes in physiologic
function over time include
 Formal dyspnea assessment tools,
 The forced vital capacity (FVC),
 Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon
monoxide (DLCO), and
 The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance and
oxyhemoglobin saturation change
10/2/2019
57
Follow-up
 The baseline FVC value has not been shown to
correlate well with disease course for patients with
IPF, but change in FVC over time has been show to
correlate well with stable versus progressive disease
with greater than 10% decline considered to be
significant and indicative of disease progression
 A decline of ≥15% in DLCO has also been correlated
with disease progression in IPF, and declining 6-MWT
distance or oxyhemoglobin saturation are also
associated with disease progression
10/2/2019
58
Follow-up
 More recent analyses suggest that changes in
FVC that are less than 10% may represent
important clinical change, and using relative
change rather than absolute change in FVC
values may provide a better indication of
clinical response
 Biomarkers
 Biomarkers that reflect disease severity and
correlate with prognosis have been reported for
IPF, but these have yet to be validated for use in
the clinical setting
10/2/2019
59
Follow-up
 HRCT for follow-up
 In addition to its utility in diagnosis, HRCT can
be scored for the extent/severity of fibrosis,
and the fibrosis severity scoring has been
shown to correlate with prognosis
 However, the use of serial HRCT scanning has
not been validated as a useful gauge of disease
progression over time for IPF and presents a
significant radiation risk to the patient.
10/2/2019
60
10/2/2019
61
Refrences
 Harrison principle of Medicine 20th ed.
 Upto date 21.6
10/2/2019
62
???
+++
suggestion /recommendation
10/2/201963

Ild seminar ppt

  • 1.
    INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASES Prepared by-Mikru Taye C1- student-2019 GC Moderator–Dr. Getachew Endrie (MD, Internist) 10/2/2019 1
  • 2.
    Presentation out line Introduction  Classification  Pathogenesis  Clinical evaluation /presentation  Diagnosis  Treatment  Follow up 10/2/2019 2
  • 3.
    Introduction  ILDs representa large number of conditions that involve the parenchyma of the lung—the alveoli, the alveolar epithelium, the capillary endothelium, and the spaces between those structures—as well as the perivascular and lymphatic tissues.  The disorders in this heterogeneous group are classified together because of similar clinical, physiologic, radiologic or pathologic manifestations. 10/2/2019 3
  • 4.
    Introduction  There aremore than 200 known individual diseases  Classification 1. Those associated with predominant inflammation and fibrosis 2. Those with a predominantly granulomatous reaction in interstitial or vascular areas  Each of these groups can be subdivided further according to whether the cause is known or unknown.  For each ILD there may be an acute phase, and there is usually a chronic one as well.  Rarely, some are recurrent, with intervals of subclinical disease. 10/2/2019 4
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Introduction  The mostcommon ILDs of unknown etiology are Sarcoidosis IPF and Pulmonary fibrosis associated with connective tissue diseases.  The most common ILDs of known etiology are those of environmental and occupational related ILDs  especially the inhalation of inorganic dusts organic dusts various fumes or gases 10/2/2019 6
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Pathogenesis  The ILDsare nonmalignant disorders and are not caused by identified infectious agents.  The precise pathway(s) leading from injury to fibrosis is not known.  Although there are multiple initiating agent(s) of injury, the immunopathogenic responses of lung tissue are limited, and the mechanisms of repair have common features 10/2/2019 9
  • 10.
    Pathogenesis  Granulomatous LungDisease  It is characterized by an accumulation of ➢ T lymphocytes, ➢ macrophages, and granulomasin-> in the lung ➢ epithelioid cells  Many patients with granulomatous lung disease remain free of severe impairment of lung function or, when symptomatic, improve after treatment  Main DDx: Sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis 10/2/2019 10
  • 11.
    ✓ Pathogenesis  Inflammationand Fibrosis  Initial Insult: an injury to the epithelial surface that causes inflammation in the air spaces and alveolar walls  If the disease becomes chronic, inflammation spreads to adjacent portions of the interstitium and vasculature and eventually causes interstitial fibrosis.  Important histopathologic patterns in these ILDs: ✓ usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), ✓ nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, ✓ respiratory bronchiolitis ✓ diffuse alveolar damage (acute or organizing), and ✓ lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia 10/2/2019 11
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Clinical Evaluation  Athorough and comprehensive history may provide invaluable information that can suggest certain entities and provide suspicion that a patient may have a specific diagnosis such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) or CTD-ILD  Additional clues to an ultimate diagnosis can be provided by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary physical examination findings, 10/2/2019 14
  • 15.
    Clinical Evaluation  Thedifferential diagnosis can be considerably narrowed when key elements of the patient interview and physical examination findings are combined with appropriate measurements of lung function, specific blood tests such as autoimmune serologies to assist in the detection of CTD if such are indicated, extra-pulmonary tissue sampling (e.g. lymph node or skin biopsy), and thoracic imaging. 10/2/2019 15
  • 16.
    Clinical Evaluation  History Progressive exertional dyspnea is the commonest complaint.  Some may not have dyspnea – eg Sarcoidosis  The other is persistent non productive cough  Chest Pain, Hemoptysis and Wheeze are uncommon 10/2/2019 16
  • 17.
    Diagnosis  History  Pattern->Acute,Subacute , Chronic and/or Episodic.  Age-> 20-40 years ,IPF older than 60yrs.  Sex-> Mostly female. ◼ In males -> ILDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis, IPF and Occupation related ILDs like pneumoconiosis  Some ILDs are related with smoking. ◼ Two third to 75% of IPF and familial lung fibrosis have history of smoking cigarette. ◼ A strict Occupational and Environmental History 10/2/2019 17
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
     P/E  The findingsare usually not specific 10/2/201920
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Diagnosis  Radiography  CXRfindings include ◼ a bibasilar reticular pattern ◼ A nodular or mixed pattern of alveolar filling and increased reticular markings ◼ A subgroup of ILDs exhibit nodular opacities with a predilection for the upper lung zones [sarcoidosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, silicosis, berylliosis, RA (necrobiotic nodular form), ankylosing spondylitis].  Presence of honeycomb appearance indicates poor prognosis 10/2/2019 23
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
     Radiography  Avariety of infectious processes cause interstitial opacities fungal pneumonias (eg, coccidioidomycosis, cryptococcosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii), atypical bacterial pneumonias, and viral pneumonias.  These infections often occur in immunocompromised hosts 10/2/2019 26
  • 27.
    Diagnosis  Radiography- HRCT HRCT is superior to CXR in that Early detection and confirmation of the disease Better assessment of extent and distribution of the lesions Useful even in patients with normal chest radiograph Can better detect the presence of concomitant condition like mediastinal adenopathy, carcinoma… Can preclude and be useful before lung biopsy 10/2/2019 27
  • 28.
     Radiography- HRCT CertainHRCT findings help to narrow the differential diagnosis of ILD.  Bilateral symmetric hilar adenopathy and upper lung zone reticular opacities suggest sarcoidosis or another granulomatous disease  Pleural plaques with linear calcification suggest asbestosis  Centrilobular nodules that spare the subpleural region are seen in hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis and also respiratory, follicular, and cellular bronchiolitis 10/2/2019 28
  • 29.
    ❖A complete lackof pulmonary parenchymal changes on HRCT imaging virtually excludes a diagnosis of ILD ❖But, it may rarely still be present with microscopic involvement. 10/2/201929
  • 30.
     Gallium-67 lungscanning — Gallium-67 lung scanning is of limited value as a means of evaluating patients with ILD. We do not obtain gallium-67 lung scans in the evaluation of patients with ILD.  FDG-PET scanning — The role of (18)F-2-deoxy-2- fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in the evaluation of ILD is unclear. In a series of 35 patients with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis, diffuse uptake of FDG was noted in 30 patients and focal uptake in four. However, positive FDG uptake can also be seen in sarcoidosis and pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis. We do not typically obtain PET scans in the evaluation of ILD. 10/2/2019 30
  • 31.
    Diagnosis  PFT  Mostforms of ILD produce a restrictive defect with reduced total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual capacity, and residual volume  FEV1 and FVC are reduced, related to the decreased TLC  FEV1/FVC ratio is usually normal or increased  Lung volumes decrease as lung stiffness worsens with disease progression  Pulmonary function studies have been proved to have prognostic value in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, particularly IPF and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) 10/2/2019 31
  • 32.
    Diagnosis  PFT  Incontrast, an interstitial pattern on chest radiograph accompanied by obstructive airflow limitation (ie, a reduced FEV1/FVC ratio) on lung function testing is suggestive of any of the following processes: ➢ Sarcoidosis ➢ Lymphangioleiomyomatosis ➢ Hypersensitivity pneumonitis ➢ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis ➢ Tuberous sclerosis and pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis ➢ Combined COPD and ILD ➢ Constrictive bronchiolitis 10/2/2019 32
  • 33.
    Diagnosis  Diffusion Capacity A reduction in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO) is a common but nonspecific finding in most ILDs  Moderate to severe reduction of DLCO in the presence of normal lung volumes in a patient with ILD suggests one of the following: ◼ Combined emphysema and ILD ◼ Combined ILD and pulmonary vascular disease ◼ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis ◼ Pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis 10/2/2019 33
  • 34.
    Diagnosis  DLCO  Pulmonaryvascular disease, and thus a reduction in DLCO, can develop in patients with ILD as a consequence of hypoxemic vasoconstriction, thromboembolic disease complicating the ILD, or a disease with both ILD and pulmonary hypertension, such as scleroderma.  In general, the severity of the DLCO reduction does not correlate well with disease prognosis, unless the DLCO is less than 35 percent of predicted ◼ Longitudinal changes in DLCO have been used to assess disease progression or regression. Due to difficulties with reproducibility in measuring DLCO, a change of 15 percent is needed to identify a true change in disease severity 10/2/2019 34
  • 35.
    Diagnosis  Arterial BloodGas  Resting: May be normal or reveal hypoxemia (secondary to a mismatching of ventilation to perfusion) and respiratory alkalosis.  A normal resting arterial O2 tension does not rule out significant hypoxemia during exercise or sleep  Carbon dioxide (CO2) retention is rare and is usually a manifestation of end-stage disease 10/2/2019 35
  • 36.
    Diagnosis  Exercise Testing Normal values for resting arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2 ) or pulse O 2 saturation do not rule out significant hypoxemia during exercise or sleep.  Thus, it is important to perform exercise testing with serial measurement of arterial blood gases or pulse oximetry  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with measurement of arterial blood gases to detect abnormalities of gas exchange (b/c hypoxemia may not be seen at rest) 10/2/2019 36
  • 37.
    Diagnosis  Exercise Testing Exercise testing may take the form of a cardiopulmonary exercise test, a six-minute walk test, or informal ambulatory oximetry including a stair climb to replicate the patient's usual daily activity. 10/2/2019 37
  • 38.
     BAL  Virtuallyall patients presenting with hemoptysis and radiographic ILD should undergo BAL promptly to confirm an alveolar source of bleeding and identify any infectious etiologies.  The majority of patients with an acute onset of ILD will undergo BAL to evaluate for acute eosinophilic pneumonia, alveolar hemorrhage, malignancy, and opportunistic or atypical infection, which can often be diagnosed on the basis of BAL findings 10/2/2019 38
  • 39.
     BAL  Theright middle lobe or lingula of the left upper lobe are likely the best regions  Ground glass opacification or profuse nodular change are more likely to provide useful diagnostic information  BAL fluid and sediment can be analyzed for infection or the presence of malignant cells, and the gross appearance of freshly retrieved BAL fluid may provide diagnosistic information 10/2/2019 39
  • 40.
    Disease category ExamplesFindings in BAL fluid Malignancy Lymphangitic carcinomatosis Malignant cells Bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma Malignant cells Pulmonary lymphoma Malignant cells Diseases due to inhaled (exogenous) material Lipoid pneumonia Fat globules in macrophages (oil-red- O-stain) Multinucleated giant cells Asbestosis Ferruginous bodies Silicosis Dust particles seen by polarized microscopy Berylliosis Positive lymphocyte transformation test to beryllium salts Inflammatory Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage Large numbers of erythrocytes Hemosiderin-laden macrophages (iron stain) Sequential lavages progressively more hemorrhagic Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia Eosinophils ≥40 percent Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia Eosinophils ≥25 percent Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis Lipoproteinaceous material (periodic acid-Schiff stain) Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Histiocytosis X) Monoclonal antibody (T6) positive histiocytes CD1 positive Langerhans cells >5 percent Birbeck granules in lavaged macrophages (seen by electron microscopy) 10/2/201940
  • 41.
    High count (≥25percent) ➢Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (≥40 percent) ➢Churg Strauss syndrome with active pneumonitis ➢Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia (≥25 percent) ➢Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (40 to 70 percent) Mild to moderate counts (<25 percent) ➢Connective tissue disease ➢Drug-induced pneumonitis ➢Fungal pneumonia ➢Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (<10 percent) ➢Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis ➢Sarcoidosis Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL Eosinophilia 10/2/201941
  • 42.
    ➢Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis(15 to 40 percent) ➢Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (40 to 70 percent) ➢Inorganic dust diseases ➢Asbestosis ➢Silicosis ➢Cigarette smoking (<10 percent) ➢Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Histiocytosis X) ➢Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (acute) ➢Sarcoidosis (advanced) Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL Neutrophilia 10/2/201942
  • 43.
    ➢ Hypersensitivity pneumonitis(60 to 80 percent) ➢ Sarcoidosis (Acute - 40 to 60 percent) ➢ Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (15 to 30 percent) ➢ Berylliosis ➢ Granite workers ➢ Amiodarone pneumonitis ➢ Lymphoma/Pseudolymphoma ➢ Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Early) Interstitial lung disease associated with BAL Lymphocytosis 10/2/201943
  • 44.
    Diagnosis  Lung biopsyis the most effective method for confirming the diagnosis and assessing disease activity  Lung biopsy: 3 types ◼ Transbronchial (fibreoptic bronchoscopy) ◼ Video Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) ◼ Surgical Lung Biopsy (SLB)  Adequate sized multiple (4-8) biopsies should be taken from at least 2 lobes ◼ Avoid areas with extensive fibrosis* 10/2/2019 44
  • 45.
    Diagnosis  Lung biopsy-complications  Open lung biopsy in patients with suspected ILD has approximately a 4.3% 30-day mortality rate, whereas VATS biopsy appears to be safer with an associated 30-day mortality that is somewhat lower than open biopsy but not negligible at approximately 2.1%  Additionally, the highest mortality risk may occur in patients whose ultimate diagnosis is IPF ◼ And SLB in patients with IPF has been reported to trigger an acute exacerbation of IPF ◼ However, confirming the diagnosis and differentiating among specific forms of IIP may not be possible without performing SLB. 10/2/2019 45
  • 46.
    Diagnosis  Lung Biopsy-Contraindications  Serious cardiovascular condition  Honeycombing  Radiographic evidence of end stage disease  Severe Pulmonary dysfunction  Major operative risks eg. Elderly 10/2/2019 46
  • 47.
    Diagnosis  *Serology  Usuallya hypersensitivity precipitin panel like ➢anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) ➢rheumatoid factor, ➢anti-topoisomerase and ➢anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)  Esophageal Manometry & PH  awareness of abnormal GER Vs aspiration -> ILD 10/2/2019 47
  • 48.
    Treatment  Although thecourse of ILD is variable, progression is common and often insidious  Therapy does not reverse fibrosis  The major goals of treatment are  Permanent removal of the offending agent, when known, and  Early identification and aggressive suppression of the acute and chronic inflammatory process, thereby reducing further lung damage 10/2/2019 48
  • 49.
    Treatment  Hypoxemia (PaO2<55 mmHg) at rest and/or with exercise should be managed with supplemental oxygen.  Management of cor pulmonale may be required as the disease progresses  Pulmonary rehabilitation has been shown to improve the quality of life in patients with ILD 10/2/2019 49
  • 50.
    Treatment  Immunosuppressive anti-inflammatoryagents are used to treat various forms of ILD  Treatment of any form of ILD with immunosuppressive therapy is off-label in the U.S. and anti-inflammatory/ immunosuppressive pharmacologic therapy has not been validated in placebo-controlled clinical trials  However, there is reasonably compelling evidence that the administration of agents such as corticosteroids is strongly associated with improvement or even clearing of lung pathology for many forms of ILD. 10/2/2019 50
  • 51.
    Treatment  This isparticularly the case for disorders such as cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), eosinophilic pneumonia, sarcoidosis, or cellular non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) 10/2/2019 51
  • 52.
    Treatment  Glucocorticoids  Steriodsare the mainstay of therapy though there has not been a clinical trial supporting it  Prednisolol 0.5-1mg/kg once daily dosing is started and given for 4-12 weeks and patient reevaluated after this time.  Then if the patient is improving it should be tapered to 0.25-0.5mg/kg and kept for 4-12 weeks.  If the patient’s condition declines in this period, other agents can be added like cyclophosphamide and azathioprine. 10/2/2019 52
  • 53.
    Treatment  Cyclophosphamide andazathioprine (1–2 mg/kg lean body weight per day), with or without glucocorticoids, have been tried with variable success in IPF, vasculitis, progressive systemic sclerosis, and other ILDs.  An objective response usually requires at least 8–12 weeks to occur  Lung transplantation can be considered for ILDs which are chronic and irreversible despite therapy. 10/2/2019 53
  • 54.
    Treatment  When extensivefibrosis is present, such therapies may be less efficacious, especially for patients with IPF, for whom currently available immunosuppressive or antifibrotic therapies are not recommended  However, some forms of CTD-associated ILD (NSIP or UIP pathologies) have been reported to respond to mycophenolate therapy, which also allowed a significant lowering of corticosteroid dosing 10/2/2019 54
  • 55.
    Treatment  Anti-fibrotic pharmacologictherapies are being increasingly brought to clinical trials, and patients should be encouraged to enroll in clinical trials if they are found to have IPF or other forms of advanced ILD for which effective therapies have yet to be identified and clinical trials for their specific form of ILD are open to enrollment. 10/2/2019 55
  • 56.
    Treatment  Lung transplantation Lung transplantation is an accepted form of treatment for patients with ILD that is progressive, clearly leading to respiratory failure, and refractory to other therapies 10/2/2019 56
  • 57.
    Follow-up  Measurements thatcan be made periodically to objectively assess changes in physiologic function over time include  Formal dyspnea assessment tools,  The forced vital capacity (FVC),  Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and  The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance and oxyhemoglobin saturation change 10/2/2019 57
  • 58.
    Follow-up  The baselineFVC value has not been shown to correlate well with disease course for patients with IPF, but change in FVC over time has been show to correlate well with stable versus progressive disease with greater than 10% decline considered to be significant and indicative of disease progression  A decline of ≥15% in DLCO has also been correlated with disease progression in IPF, and declining 6-MWT distance or oxyhemoglobin saturation are also associated with disease progression 10/2/2019 58
  • 59.
    Follow-up  More recentanalyses suggest that changes in FVC that are less than 10% may represent important clinical change, and using relative change rather than absolute change in FVC values may provide a better indication of clinical response  Biomarkers  Biomarkers that reflect disease severity and correlate with prognosis have been reported for IPF, but these have yet to be validated for use in the clinical setting 10/2/2019 59
  • 60.
    Follow-up  HRCT forfollow-up  In addition to its utility in diagnosis, HRCT can be scored for the extent/severity of fibrosis, and the fibrosis severity scoring has been shown to correlate with prognosis  However, the use of serial HRCT scanning has not been validated as a useful gauge of disease progression over time for IPF and presents a significant radiation risk to the patient. 10/2/2019 60
  • 61.
  • 62.
    Refrences  Harrison principleof Medicine 20th ed.  Upto date 21.6 10/2/2019 62
  • 63.