Identifying the variation of
experiences when dealing with
problems in complex systems.
John Mendoza Garcia1, 2, Monica E. Cardella1
William C. Oakes1
1Purdue University, IN
2Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá,
Colombia, South America
Agenda
• Introduction
• Summary of literature
• Research Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 2
Introduction
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 3
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
High order
thinking skills
Technical
knowledge
• Creativity
• Critical
thinking
• Design thinking
• Problem
solving
• Systems
thinking
Who is calling?
Eng.
Professional
societies
Eng.
Academics
Management
Scientist
Thought
leaders in Eng
Ed.
Industry ABET
Policy makers
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Why?
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 5
Technological
systems
Environment
Human
systems
designing and
implementing solutions
– Sustainable products
– Processes
– Organizations
– Public policies.
– Etc.
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
We have been teaching
Systems Thinking
for several years…
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 6
• Why perception says… engineers lack its development?
• Why research findings show failure in its learning?
But…
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Curriculum design
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 7
Effective curriculum design
Achievement of
learning goals
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Curriculum design
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 8
Effective curriculum design
Achievement of
learning goals
How can we know if my
curriculum is working??
Guilty?
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 9
Curriculum design
8/28/2015 TravelGrant 9
Content
Assessment Pedagogy
We need to know effectiveness of teaching of
Systems Thinking• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Assessment Triangle (Pellegrino, 2002)
8/28/2015 TravelGrant 10
Observation Interpretation
Cognition
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Research question
Iteration 1
–How people develop systems
thinking?
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
What do we know about the development of
systems thinking and its assessment?
- Studies from expert’s point of view
- Lineal path based on Bloom: Hooper and Stave (2008)
- Studies from learner’s point of view (qualitative)
- Frank, 2000
- 30 Laws for Capacity for Engineering systems thinking
- Richmond, 2001
- A subset of 7 critical thinking skills
- Davidz, 2006
- experiential learning, individual characteristics and
supportive environments key to develop systems thinking
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Variation theory of learning
learning is about an increase of the amount of
critical aspects and features the learner can
discern and be focused on simultaneously
[from a dimension or conception]. (Marton,
2014, p. 60
Learning can be seen as moving from one
way of seeing and dealing with the
problem to another more powerful
(Marton, 2014)
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 14
This study’s research question
“what are the variations in the
ways people experience dealing
with problems in complex
systems?”
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 15
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Engineering complex systems
Complexity
Environmental
Technological
Humans
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 16
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Development of systems thinking
from learner’s point of view
Davidz, H,. (2006)
Graphic from Richmond.
(1990)
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 17
Systems thinking inventory
and its test
Identify intuitive systems
thinking
Measuring change of
mental models
Assessment of
systems thinking
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 18
Variation theory of
learning
Transfer of learning Conceptual change
Cognitive/constructivist
learning theories
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 19
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Phenomenography
• Understanding the variation in how “we “see” the
world and how it “shows itself” to us (Marton,
2014, p. 122)
• Main assumption
– limited number of qualitatively different ways
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 20
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Phenomenography
Figure 1- Points of departure between phenomenography
and other research approaches. Trigwell (2000)
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 21
Data Collection
How many participants?
– I will recruit 20 participants for this study
• 10 students
• 10 professionals
20 – 30 (Bowden, 2005)
10-15 (Trigwell, 2000)
10 (Harding, 2013)
20 (Sandberg (2000), citing
Alexandersson (1994) who cited
more than 1000 research and 50
doctoral theses)
17 Sandberg (2000)
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 22
Data Collection
• Undergraduate students
– Random survey to capture variation
• Graduate/Professionals
– Purposeful sampling
– maximize variation
• Criteria for variation
– Framework: Enablers of systems thinking
(Davidz,2006)
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 23
Data Collection
• Think aloud
• 5 tasks tested – 2 chosen.
– Scene it!
– Wolves and Rabbits (L. B. Sweeney & Sterman, 2007)
– The manufacturing case: (L. Sweeney & Sterman, 2001)
– The coffee challenge (Purzer, Ş. & Wertz, 2013).
– Disaster relief scenario (Adams et al., 2010)
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 24
Data Analysis
Marton’s approach
- Look for different ways to address the problem
- Have them in one place
- Rip them off their context and the participant
- Define different categories
- Define a hierarchy
- Simple to powerful
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 25
Data Analysis
Marton’s approach
- Look for different ways to address the problem
- Have them in one place
- Rip them off their context and the participant
- Define different categories
- Define a hierarchy
- Simple to powerful
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 26
Data Analysis
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
Expected outcome
Ways to address the task, from less to
more powerful
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 27
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
• Maybe one of firsts theories cognitive
theories about systems thinking
development from engineering education
• Several disciplines and fields in academy
and in industry
– Assessment!
– Curriculum design
Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 28
• Introduction
• Summary of
literature
• Research
Approach
• Impact
• Current programs could support claims
• Application of variation theory of learning
Impact
8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 29
Thank you …

Identifying the variation in ways to deal

  • 1.
    Identifying the variationof experiences when dealing with problems in complex systems. John Mendoza Garcia1, 2, Monica E. Cardella1 William C. Oakes1 1Purdue University, IN 2Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia, South America
  • 2.
    Agenda • Introduction • Summaryof literature • Research Approach • Impact 8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 2
  • 3.
    Introduction 8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 3 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact High order thinking skills Technical knowledge • Creativity • Critical thinking • Design thinking • Problem solving • Systems thinking
  • 4.
    Who is calling? Eng. Professional societies Eng. Academics Management Scientist Thought leadersin Eng Ed. Industry ABET Policy makers • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 5.
    Why? 8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 5 Technological systems Environment Human systems designing and implementing solutions – Sustainable products – Processes – Organizations – Public policies. – Etc. • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 6.
    We have beenteaching Systems Thinking for several years… 8/28/2015 Tool to Assess Interest in PP 6 • Why perception says… engineers lack its development? • Why research findings show failure in its learning? But… • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 7.
    Curriculum design 8/28/2015 Toolto Assess Interest in PP 7 Effective curriculum design Achievement of learning goals • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 8.
    Curriculum design 8/28/2015 Toolto Assess Interest in PP 8 Effective curriculum design Achievement of learning goals How can we know if my curriculum is working?? Guilty? • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 9.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 9 Curriculum design 8/28/2015 TravelGrant 9 Content Assessment Pedagogy We need to know effectiveness of teaching of Systems Thinking• Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 10.
    Assessment Triangle (Pellegrino,2002) 8/28/2015 TravelGrant 10 Observation Interpretation Cognition • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 11.
    Research question Iteration 1 –Howpeople develop systems thinking? • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 12.
    What do weknow about the development of systems thinking and its assessment? - Studies from expert’s point of view - Lineal path based on Bloom: Hooper and Stave (2008) - Studies from learner’s point of view (qualitative) - Frank, 2000 - 30 Laws for Capacity for Engineering systems thinking - Richmond, 2001 - A subset of 7 critical thinking skills - Davidz, 2006 - experiential learning, individual characteristics and supportive environments key to develop systems thinking • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 13.
    Variation theory oflearning learning is about an increase of the amount of critical aspects and features the learner can discern and be focused on simultaneously [from a dimension or conception]. (Marton, 2014, p. 60 Learning can be seen as moving from one way of seeing and dealing with the problem to another more powerful (Marton, 2014) • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 14.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 14 This study’s research question “what are the variations in the ways people experience dealing with problems in complex systems?” • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 15.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 15 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact Engineering complex systems Complexity Environmental Technological Humans
  • 16.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 16 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact Development of systems thinking from learner’s point of view Davidz, H,. (2006) Graphic from Richmond. (1990)
  • 17.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 17 Systems thinking inventory and its test Identify intuitive systems thinking Measuring change of mental models Assessment of systems thinking • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 18.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 18 Variation theory of learning Transfer of learning Conceptual change Cognitive/constructivist learning theories • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 19.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 19 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact Phenomenography • Understanding the variation in how “we “see” the world and how it “shows itself” to us (Marton, 2014, p. 122) • Main assumption – limited number of qualitatively different ways
  • 20.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 20 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact Phenomenography Figure 1- Points of departure between phenomenography and other research approaches. Trigwell (2000)
  • 21.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 21 Data Collection How many participants? – I will recruit 20 participants for this study • 10 students • 10 professionals 20 – 30 (Bowden, 2005) 10-15 (Trigwell, 2000) 10 (Harding, 2013) 20 (Sandberg (2000), citing Alexandersson (1994) who cited more than 1000 research and 50 doctoral theses) 17 Sandberg (2000) • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 22.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 22 Data Collection • Undergraduate students – Random survey to capture variation • Graduate/Professionals – Purposeful sampling – maximize variation • Criteria for variation – Framework: Enablers of systems thinking (Davidz,2006) • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 23.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 23 Data Collection • Think aloud • 5 tasks tested – 2 chosen. – Scene it! – Wolves and Rabbits (L. B. Sweeney & Sterman, 2007) – The manufacturing case: (L. Sweeney & Sterman, 2001) – The coffee challenge (Purzer, Ş. & Wertz, 2013). – Disaster relief scenario (Adams et al., 2010) • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 24.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 24 Data Analysis Marton’s approach - Look for different ways to address the problem - Have them in one place - Rip them off their context and the participant - Define different categories - Define a hierarchy - Simple to powerful • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 25.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 25 Data Analysis Marton’s approach - Look for different ways to address the problem - Have them in one place - Rip them off their context and the participant - Define different categories - Define a hierarchy - Simple to powerful • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact
  • 26.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 26 Data Analysis • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact Expected outcome Ways to address the task, from less to more powerful
  • 27.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 27 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact • Maybe one of firsts theories cognitive theories about systems thinking development from engineering education • Several disciplines and fields in academy and in industry – Assessment! – Curriculum design Impact
  • 28.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 28 • Introduction • Summary of literature • Research Approach • Impact • Current programs could support claims • Application of variation theory of learning Impact
  • 29.
    8/28/2015 Tool toAssess Interest in PP 29 Thank you …