Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byLiya James
Idean_BigD_2015
This document discusses designing for social good. It provides examples of social goods like clean air and literacy. Designing for social good is a choice that requires considering stakeholders beyond just customers, including communities, environments, and future generations. An effective process involves co-initiating with diverse partners, co-sensing issues and opportunities, co-presencing to understand perspectives, co-creating prototypes, and co-evolving solutions. Quotes emphasize the need to consider humanity, compassion and justice in technology and design visions. The document contrasts different approaches like immersion versus observation and open versus closed dialogue. It concludes that social issues are not problems to be solved but rather continuous co-creative systems that require impact without permission within communities
Idean_BigD_2015
- 1. DESIGNING FOR GOOD BigDesign Conference September 18, 2015
- 2.
- 3. 3 How Might WeRestore Inner Peace And Help Heal Our Youth?
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10. 10 A good orservice that benefits the largest number of people in the largest possible way. Some classic examples of social goods are clean air, clean water and literacy; in addition, many economic proponents include access to services such as healthcare… “
- 11. 11 : to planand make decisions about (something that is being built or created) : to create the plans, drawings, etc., that show how (something) will be made : to plan and make (something) for a specific use or purpose “
- 12. 12 DESIGNING FOR GOODIS A CHOICE
- 13.
- 14. ME A POTTER MY TEAM GUESTS HOSTS ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS MYORGANIZATION MY COMMUNITY POTTERS KNOTTERS APPRENTICES TEACHERS GUEST ARTISTS UNIVERSITY WORLD POTTERY STUDIO FRIEND’S KILN INDIGENOUS MATERIALS THE EARTH ART & SPIRITUALITY THE ENVIRONMENT CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY
- 15. 15 A TYPICAL PRODUCTDESIGN PROCESS Research Customers/Users Insight Data Analysis UX vision Concept Ideate/Iterate Implement Agile Design & Develop the experience
- 16. THEORY U 1 2 3 4 5CO-INIATIATING build commonintent listen to others and what life calls you to do CO-SENSING go to the places of most potential and listen with your mind and heart wide open CO-PRESENCING retreat and reflect,go to a place of silence and allow the inner knowing to emerge CO-CREATING prototype a microcosm of the new in order to explore the future by doing CO-EVOLVING embody the new in ecosystems that facilitate seeing and acting from the whole
- 17. 17 “Your visions oftechnology, design, entertainment and creativity have to be married with visions of humanity, compassion, and justice.” - Bryan Stevenson, Executive Director of the Equal Justice Initiative and TED Speaker
- 18. 18 IMMERSION VS. OBSERVATION GLOBAL WELLBEINGLAB LEARNING JOURNEY IN BHUTAN
- 19. 19 CO-CREATIVE DIALOGUES VS. INTERVIEWS AT&T FOUNDATION CO-CREATIVEDIALOGUES WITH PEOPLE IN THE EDTECH ECOSYSTEM
- 20. 20 DESIGN THINGS VS. BEHAVIORS “OUTOF ORDER” “WHERE WOULD YOU GO IF YOU HAD NO WHERE TO POOP?” BROKE ASS-STUART HOST OF BROKE-ASS CITY BARTENDER POET TRAVEL WRITER
- 21. 21 OPEN VS. CLOSE DIALOGUE THEMONT FLEUR SCENARIOS WHAT WILL SOUTH AFRICA BE LIKE IN THE YEAR 2002? ADAM KAHANE MONT FLEUR FACILITATOR REOS PARTNERS
- 22. 22 DESIGN DEMOCRACY VS. EXCLUSIVITY DESIGNING WORKPLACES WITH A PURPOSE AND A SENSE OF BELONGING WWW.IDEAN.COM/ACADEMY
- 23. 23 UNLIKE DESIGNING FORPRODUCTS, SOCIAL ISSUES ARE NOT PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED, IT’S A CO-CREATIVE SYSTEM THAT EVOLVES CONTINUALLY. YOU DON’T NEED PERMISSION TO MAKE AN IMPACT IN YOUR SYSTEM.
- 24.