Downloaded 331 times
Uploaded byNEXTtour
IDC Nutanix - Hyperconvergence and the Pulling Forces in the Datacenter
The document discusses the evolving state of datacenters, emphasizing the impact of hyperconvergence on operational efficiency and the growing importance of integrated systems. Key drivers for change include the increasing demand for scalability, reduced costs, and simplified deployment processes, as well as evolving data management practices. It highlights customer experiences, market trends, and the necessity for IT departments to adapt to this new wave of technological convergence.
More Related Content
Similar to IDC Nutanix - Hyperconvergence and the Pulling Forces in the Datacenter
![Coded Agents – with UiPath SDK + LangGraph [Virtual Hands-on Workshop]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/codedagentsdeck-251215155422-5497c599-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
IDC Nutanix - Hyperconvergence and the Pulling Forces in the Datacenter
- 1. Hyperconvergence and thePulling Forces in the Datacenter Giorgio Nebuloni, IDC EMEA Nutanix .NEXT On Tour 2015
- 2. Agenda State ofthe Datacenter Union What’s Forcing Change The New Wave of Convergence Customer Learnings Market Data Essential Guidance © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 2
- 3.
- 4. Goal of Operatinga Datacenter © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 4 Datacenter Staff Software (Business App, OS, BSM, System Mgmt) External Contracts (outsourcers, clouds, suppliers) Facility (energy, building, etc.) Hardware (servers, storage, networking) Delivering IT services to users
- 5. A Well KnownReality © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 5 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 2009Q1 2009Q2 2009Q3 2009Q4 2010Q1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2013Q4 2014Q1 2014Q2 2014Q3 2014Q4 2015Q1 2015Q2 Compute Cores shipped Servers shipped 4 per. Mov. Avg. (Compute Cores shipped) 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 2009Q1 2009Q2 2009Q3 2009Q4 2010Q1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2013Q4 2014Q1 2014Q2 2014Q3 2014Q4 2015Q1 2015Q2 Total Terabytes shipped All data Western Europe; Sources: IDC EMEA Quarterly ESS and Server Trackers, 2Q15 (September 2015)
- 6. The Virtualization “Given” 6Source:IDC WW Server Virtualization Tracker; IDC Estimates; all data Western Europe 36% of all new servers are virtualized in 2014 ~70% excluding bare metal environments >8 million VMs deployed in 2014 29% in 2012 ~50% in 2012 ~1.6 million physical servers deployed in 2014
- 7.
- 8. The Alphabet ofChange © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 8
- 9. Give me a…D © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 9 Mobile Users •50% Growth •3.8 Billion •50% Penetration Data Center Cores •2x Growth •77 Billion •10/Person Data Growth •4x Growth •24ZBs •760 TBs/Second 2018 Massive Size Driven by Consumers + ∞ Combinations of Technology
- 10. Visions, but notOnly Visions Idea Bank / iTaxi Pilot ATM-on-Demand in Warsaw Programmatic Marketing Company © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 10
- 11. Impact on ITOperations Copyright 2014 IDC Operation Efficiencies Deeper Customer Relationships Net-New Revenue Streams Geo-Dispersed & Always Available Extract Value from Corporate Data Faster Time to Deployment Business Benefits Data Center Impact
- 12. Give me an…S 12Source: European Integrated System Survey, total =400 (103, 137, 160) Q. On average how long (in days) does it take to develop and deploy a new application?36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 10 to 99 empl. 100 to 499 500+ Average days to develop/deploy an application
- 13. Winning Back Time 13Source:European Integrated System Survey, total =400 Q. Considering the following mix of tasks, over a given week, what percentage of total IT admin and operations staff time (across server, networking and storage infrastructure) is spent on the following? 16.9% 18.6% 14.1% 39.2% 11.2% Provisioning, patching, config management New service request and approval mgmt Vendor and internal meetings Monitoring, troubleshooting, remediation Innovation and new projects
- 14. Power & Cooling Mgmt& Administration New Server Spending Give me an… O 14 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 OPEX/CAPEX Ratio 0.48 0.77 1.51 2.83 3.91 $94B $123B $138B $206B $272B WW Server, P&C and Administration Spending 3x 8x
- 15.
- 16.
- 17. Q. What doyou see as the top two major benefits of Integrated Systems? Please select top two Integrated Systems, convergence 1.0 ems Integrated Systems Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Virtualization SW Systems Management Middleware Apps Middleware-centric Database-centric Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Systems Management Database Integrated Systems 17 Source: European Storage Survey, 2015; N = 498 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Improved agility / faster resource availability Lower Total Cost of Ownership Improved Utilization IT resources Fewer management Tools Improved IT staff Efficiency Lower Maintenance Costs Improved Disaster Recovery Lower Power/Cooling Costs
- 18. Time of Choicefor the IT Department 18 Challenges to integrated systems 27% 27% 30% 34% 35% 36% 37% 37% 0% 20% 40% Lack of visibility into traffic patterns Cost and doubt of ROI Single point of failure Hard to segregate and protect data across multiple users Resistance from IT domains IT org not structured to implement change Concerns about app performance requirements Concerns about technical maturity What do you see as the top two challenges in moving to converged or integrated systems? N = 498 ; European Storage Survey, 2015 In the process of evaluating converged or integrated systems, what other alternatives, if any, did you consider to meet your compute, storage and network requirements? : IDC WW Converged and Integrated Systems End-User Survey (N + 308) 5% 12% 20% 20% 33% 44% 0% 20% 40% 60% Did not consider alternative Integrated Systems from a differenet vendor Do nothing - rely on existing resources Outsourcing SaaS, PaaS, IaaS "Traditional" hardware IT purchase Alternatives Evaluated
- 19. Integrated Systems vs.Hyper-Converged ems Integrated Systems Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Virtualization SW Systems Management Middleware Apps Middleware-centric Database-centric Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Systems Management Database Hyperconvergence Converged Systems Integrated Systems Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Virtualization SW Systems Management Middleware Apps Middleware-centric Database-centric Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Virtualization SW Systems Management Compute Nodes Storage Internal Fabric Operating System Systems Management Database Storage Volumes Virt. Storage Function Virt. Networking Virt. With mixed Flash/HDD storage 19 Integrated Systems Core storage and compute functionality in a single, highly virtualized, solution All compute and storage functions delivered through the same server-based resources Typically in clusters and scale-out
- 20.
- 21. Why Hyperconvergence ? Q.What were the key motivators to deploy Hyper-converged systems? Source: IDC European Storage Survey 2015, Europe (410 responses). 1Q15 (only companies using Hyperconverged) 21 20% 23% 26% 28% 30% 30% 33% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Elimination of SAN Reduction in Technical support staff Different type of backup Easier to secure budget Easier disaster recovery Ease of set up Speed of deployment Scalability 35% 33% 30%
- 22. Hyperconvergence: Improving CAPEX 22 14% 25% 27% 30% 0%20% 40% 60% 80% Network Storage - SSD Storage - HDD Servers Power Datacenter Facility Sources: IDC, Quantifying the Business Value of Nutanix Solutions (2015) 67% 51% « The complexity of doing disaster recovery in a traditional model is harder and it takes more time. But the savings is more about cost, because we're buying expensive SAN solutions. We'd probably have to buy another SAN at the second site. . . We'd be at a million dollars total of additional SAN costs » IT Manager, US company, Services
- 23. 23 23 IT StaffSavings from Management of Hyperconvergence Sources: IDC, Quantifying the Business Value of Nutanix Solutions (2015) 16% 50% 71% 82% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Application development Deployment - staff time Management Support IT Staff Productivity Gains «We needed two days with Nutanix to deploy. The old way, it would take 1-2 months for a new storage system — we'd have to buy storage separately, then buy the compute separately, and then buy networking gear, and only then could we plug it all together” IT Manager, Government (USA)
- 24. Market Data © IDCVisit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 24
- 25. 30% 25% 18% 8% 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 1% - 10%11% - 25% 26% - 50% 51% - 75% 76% - 100% H-C Systems in 18 months Hyper-converged and Storage Usage Q. What percentage of your company's total storage is used for Hyper- converged systems now and in 12/18 month? 25 40% 21% 8% 4% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 1% - 10% 11% - 25% 26% - 50% 51% - 75% 76% - 100% H-C Systems Now Source: IDC European Storage Survey 2015, Europe 556 responses. 1Q15 12% 20%
- 26. 26 0% 20% 40%60% 80% 100% 120% Hyperconverged Infrastructure All Flash Arrays Integrated Infrastructure & Platforms ODM Direct Storage Systems Hybrid Flash Arrays Enterprise Networking Market External Storage Market Server Market Total Infrastructure Market New Industries & Technologies Drive Market Growth 2015 Forecasted Growth in WW Spending Heavily Influenced by New Brands
- 27. WW Hyperconverged Infrastructure Market $0.0B $0.5B $1.0B $1.5B $2.0B 20132014 2015 2016 © IDC Visit us at IDC.com and follow us on Twitter: @IDC 27 +162% +116% +94% Sources: Worldwide Hyperconverged Systems 2015–2019 Forecast (April 2015)
- 28. Do the Buyer Homework Measure Goalsvs. Parameters Key Recommendations for IT Buyers 28 1 3 Contrast and compare with cloud 2
- 29. Any questions? For questionsor feedback, please e-mail or call us Giorgio Nebuloni gnebuloni@idc.com +49 (0) 69 90502 112 @gnebuloni