Hewison Private Wealth
   Client Strategies
BORROWING IN SUPER
Case Study
• Jim (45) owns his home with no mortgage

• SMSF - $800,000

• Property for sale - $1,000,000
Key Differences
• Limited Recourse Loan

• Single Acquirable Asset

• Can only improve asset under limited
  circumstances

• Cannot make use of the asset
Pay $1m         Loan $500k




                     Jim
                                        Bank




Property
           Rent            Interest
Bank

Loan $500k


                      Interest




          SMSF
           Jim
Transfer $1m




Bare Trust                                 Property
                                 Pay $1m
Loan $500k
               Jim                           Bank
                                Interest
Loan $500k


                     Interest




          SMSF
Transfer $1m




Bare Trust                                   Property
                                Pay $1m
Traditional      Borrow in SMSF
Jim
Salary                              $100,000           $100,000
Rental Income                        $70,000              $0
Loan Interest                       -$37,500              $0
Taxable Income                      $132,500           $100,000
Tax Payable                          $40,288            $26,950


Jim’s SMSF
Rental Income                                           $70,000
Loan Interest                                          -$37,500
Taxable Income                                          $32,500
Tax Payable                                             $4,875


Total Tax                            $40,288            $31,825


Estimated tax saving from Borrow in SMSF strategy   $8,463 per annum
Traditional       Borrow in SMSF


In 15 years time:


Property Value                        $1,700,000          $1,700,000


Purchase Price                        $1,000,000          $1,000,000


Capital Gains                          $700,000           $700,000




Capitals Gains Tax                     $162,750              $0



Capital Gains Tax Saving from Borrow in SMSF strategy      $162,750
Case Study
• Jan is 70 and retired
• SMSF of $2,000,000 & Cash of $1,000,000

• Option 1
  o   Invest $1m in Jan’s personal name
• Option 2
  o   Lend $1m to SF and invest within SMSF
Pension Strategies
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
            Strategy
• Objective – Increase tax free component


                   SMSF
  Withdraw                       Re-contribute
   Taxable                        Tax Free
  Component                      Component
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
           Strategy – Case Study
BILL
  o 64 years of age
  o Retired
  o Has a SMSF with benefits of $1 million
  o 100% of Bill’s super benefits are made up of
    the taxable component
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
    Strategy – Case Study

                     BILL

           SMSF
Withdraw            Re-contribute
$450,000              $450,000



           BILL
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
    Strategy – Case Study
If Bill were to pass away prior to
undertaking this strategy?


Before Strategy
Taxable Component        $1,000,000    100%
Tax Free Component               $0     0%

Death Benefits Tax        $165,000    16.5%
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
    Strategy – Case Study

    After Strategy
    Taxable Component    $550,000   55%
    Tax Free Component $450,000     45%


    Death Benefits Tax    $90,750 16.5%


    Tax Saving           $74,250
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
            Strategy – Case Study
BILL
  o    What if 50% of Bill’s super benefits are made
       up of the taxable component and 50% are tax
       free?
Withdrawal & Re-Contribution
    Strategy – Case Study

    After Strategy
    Taxable Component    $275,000 27.5%
    Tax Free Component $725,000 72.5%


    Death Benefits Tax    $45,375 16.5%


    Tax Saving           $37,125
Withdrawal & Re-contribution
         Strategy Considerations
• Super Contribution Limits
  o   Maximum non-concessional contributions of
      $450K

• Withdrawals are proportionate to
  components

• Possible abolition of in-specie contributions
  from 1 July 2012
Separating Pension Interests

• What is it?
  o Create multiple pensions
  o Isolate tax free components in a separate pension



• Why?
  o   Preserve tax free component
Separating Pension Interests
               Case Study
                      SMSF

  New Pension                Existing Pension
  $450,000                     $550,000
100% Tax free                100% Taxable


Pension Payment              Pension Payment
   Draw $22,500               Draw remainder
(min pension of 5%)              $47,500
Separating Pension Interests
              Case Study
• Taxable Component in 10 years’ time
  o   Before Strategy   $482,070
  o   After Strategy    $327,943


• Benefit =             $25,430
Pension Payment Breakdown
What is it?
• Management of a couple of pension payments

Benefit?
• Reduce tax liability
Pension Payment Breakdown
               Case Study
Bob & Betty
  o   Bob (62)
  o   Betty (57)
  o   SMSF value = $1 million ($500K each)
  o   All benefits are taxable component
  o   Income requirement, $150K per annum
Pension Payment Breakdown
                 Case Study
                                  Before                 After
                                Bob    Betty         Bob        Betty
Account Based Pension        $75,000 $75,000        $130,000 $20,000
Taxable income                    $0 $75,000               $0 $20,000
Income Tax                        $0 $17,550               $0   $2,400
Less: Pension Rebate (15%)        $0 $11,250               $0   $3,000
Tax Payable                       $0   $6,300              $0       $0

                        Tax Payable
                        Before          $6,300
                        After                  $0
                        Tax Saving      $6,300

Hpw Client Strategies

  • 1.
    Hewison Private Wealth Client Strategies
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Case Study • Jim(45) owns his home with no mortgage • SMSF - $800,000 • Property for sale - $1,000,000
  • 4.
    Key Differences • LimitedRecourse Loan • Single Acquirable Asset • Can only improve asset under limited circumstances • Cannot make use of the asset
  • 5.
    Pay $1m Loan $500k Jim Bank Property Rent Interest
  • 6.
    Bank Loan $500k Interest SMSF Jim Transfer $1m Bare Trust Property Pay $1m
  • 7.
    Loan $500k Jim Bank Interest Loan $500k Interest SMSF Transfer $1m Bare Trust Property Pay $1m
  • 8.
    Traditional Borrow in SMSF Jim Salary $100,000 $100,000 Rental Income $70,000 $0 Loan Interest -$37,500 $0 Taxable Income $132,500 $100,000 Tax Payable $40,288 $26,950 Jim’s SMSF Rental Income $70,000 Loan Interest -$37,500 Taxable Income $32,500 Tax Payable $4,875 Total Tax $40,288 $31,825 Estimated tax saving from Borrow in SMSF strategy $8,463 per annum
  • 9.
    Traditional Borrow in SMSF In 15 years time: Property Value $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Purchase Price $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Capital Gains $700,000 $700,000 Capitals Gains Tax $162,750 $0 Capital Gains Tax Saving from Borrow in SMSF strategy $162,750
  • 10.
    Case Study • Janis 70 and retired • SMSF of $2,000,000 & Cash of $1,000,000 • Option 1 o Invest $1m in Jan’s personal name • Option 2 o Lend $1m to SF and invest within SMSF
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy • Objective – Increase tax free component SMSF Withdraw Re-contribute Taxable Tax Free Component Component
  • 13.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study BILL o 64 years of age o Retired o Has a SMSF with benefits of $1 million o 100% of Bill’s super benefits are made up of the taxable component
  • 14.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study BILL SMSF Withdraw Re-contribute $450,000 $450,000 BILL
  • 15.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study If Bill were to pass away prior to undertaking this strategy? Before Strategy Taxable Component $1,000,000 100% Tax Free Component $0 0% Death Benefits Tax $165,000 16.5%
  • 16.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study After Strategy Taxable Component $550,000 55% Tax Free Component $450,000 45% Death Benefits Tax $90,750 16.5% Tax Saving $74,250
  • 17.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study BILL o What if 50% of Bill’s super benefits are made up of the taxable component and 50% are tax free?
  • 18.
    Withdrawal & Re-Contribution Strategy – Case Study After Strategy Taxable Component $275,000 27.5% Tax Free Component $725,000 72.5% Death Benefits Tax $45,375 16.5% Tax Saving $37,125
  • 19.
    Withdrawal & Re-contribution Strategy Considerations • Super Contribution Limits o Maximum non-concessional contributions of $450K • Withdrawals are proportionate to components • Possible abolition of in-specie contributions from 1 July 2012
  • 20.
    Separating Pension Interests •What is it? o Create multiple pensions o Isolate tax free components in a separate pension • Why? o Preserve tax free component
  • 21.
    Separating Pension Interests Case Study SMSF New Pension Existing Pension $450,000 $550,000 100% Tax free 100% Taxable Pension Payment Pension Payment Draw $22,500 Draw remainder (min pension of 5%) $47,500
  • 22.
    Separating Pension Interests Case Study • Taxable Component in 10 years’ time o Before Strategy $482,070 o After Strategy $327,943 • Benefit = $25,430
  • 23.
    Pension Payment Breakdown Whatis it? • Management of a couple of pension payments Benefit? • Reduce tax liability
  • 24.
    Pension Payment Breakdown Case Study Bob & Betty o Bob (62) o Betty (57) o SMSF value = $1 million ($500K each) o All benefits are taxable component o Income requirement, $150K per annum
  • 25.
    Pension Payment Breakdown Case Study Before After Bob Betty Bob Betty Account Based Pension $75,000 $75,000 $130,000 $20,000 Taxable income $0 $75,000 $0 $20,000 Income Tax $0 $17,550 $0 $2,400 Less: Pension Rebate (15%) $0 $11,250 $0 $3,000 Tax Payable $0 $6,300 $0 $0 Tax Payable Before $6,300 After $0 Tax Saving $6,300