One of the most important quantitative techniques that social science or UX researchers can rely on is the survey. Surveys are used in a number of disciplines, and can prove to be incredibly useful when applied to a mixed methods approach, or when looking to gather information about a large population of people. However, surveys can be over-used and poorly designed, thus providing inaccurate data and a biased picture of your user/participant population. This talk is designed to help survey creators mitigate these issues; as well as to introduce the ins-and-outs of surveys, from creation to data analysis.
A good research question should be:
1) Limited in scope and use correct terminology;
2) Doable with the appropriate research methodology and practical considerations; and
3) Avoid hidden assumptions, normative bias, or being a tautology.
This document discusses the traits of effective hypotheses for developmental research. Hypotheses should be testable using available technology and methods of measurement. They should also be concrete by including operational definitions that allow for measurement. The document contrasts inductive reasoning, where hypotheses are formed based on observations and evidence, with deductive reasoning, where a theory is used to predict observations and hypotheses. Effective hypotheses can come from existing problems, research, theories, or anywhere.
This document discusses user research and conducting experiments to test assumptions. It provides:
1. A framework for identifying risky assumptions about users, crafting experiments to test those assumptions, carrying out the experiments, and using the results.
2. Tips for crafting effective experiments, including starting with the riskiest assumption, tracking results, redesigning experiments if needed, defining clear measures of success, and making decisions as a team.
3. Best practices for carrying out experiments, such as being brief, asking open questions, active listening, and leaving personal questions to the end. The document provides examples of case studies to test assumptions about passwords and online dating.
This document discusses observation, inference, and reasoning. It defines observation as experiences perceived through the senses, where the observer only collects data without making assumptions. Inference involves using observation and logic to derive cause and effect. Reasoning connects observations through deduction, induction, or abduction to form interpretations without bias. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions from premises, inductive reasoning forms general conclusions from patterns in data, and abductive reasoning generates hypotheses when evidence is lacking. The document advises avoiding conclusions from single observations and emphasizes using reasoning to analyze observations.
The document provides guidelines for critical decision making. It discusses asking open-ended questions, properly defining problems, analyzing all available evidence even if it contradicts experts, considering assumptions and biases, controlling emotional biases, avoiding oversimplification, considering multiple interpretations, and tolerating uncertainty rather than demanding definitive answers. The key aspects of critical thinking highlighted are questioning preconceptions, evaluating all relevant evidence fairly, and acknowledging the complexities involved in decision making.
This document presents the 12-item Grit Scale used to assess an individual's grit or perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The scale consists of 12 statements where respondents indicate how much each statement is like them using a 5-point scale. Six items are scored such that higher numbers indicate more grit while the other six are reverse scored. Scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater grit ranging from 1 (not at all gritty) to 5 (extremely gritty). The scale was developed to provide a concise yet reliable measure of individual differences in grit.
The document discusses Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats framework and how it can be applied to doctoral studies. The Six Hats include White (facts), Red (emotions), Black (risks), Yellow (optimism), Green (creativity), and Blue (process). It provides examples of how each hat could be used in areas like communication between faculty and students, objective analysis and evaluation, generating new ideas, and conducting well-rounded research that considers emotions. The framework is presented as a useful code, game, trigger, and template to improve various aspects of the doctoral research process.
A good research question should be:
1) Limited in scope and use correct terminology;
2) Doable with the appropriate research methodology and practical considerations; and
3) Avoid hidden assumptions, normative bias, or being a tautology.
This document discusses the traits of effective hypotheses for developmental research. Hypotheses should be testable using available technology and methods of measurement. They should also be concrete by including operational definitions that allow for measurement. The document contrasts inductive reasoning, where hypotheses are formed based on observations and evidence, with deductive reasoning, where a theory is used to predict observations and hypotheses. Effective hypotheses can come from existing problems, research, theories, or anywhere.
This document discusses user research and conducting experiments to test assumptions. It provides:
1. A framework for identifying risky assumptions about users, crafting experiments to test those assumptions, carrying out the experiments, and using the results.
2. Tips for crafting effective experiments, including starting with the riskiest assumption, tracking results, redesigning experiments if needed, defining clear measures of success, and making decisions as a team.
3. Best practices for carrying out experiments, such as being brief, asking open questions, active listening, and leaving personal questions to the end. The document provides examples of case studies to test assumptions about passwords and online dating.
This document discusses observation, inference, and reasoning. It defines observation as experiences perceived through the senses, where the observer only collects data without making assumptions. Inference involves using observation and logic to derive cause and effect. Reasoning connects observations through deduction, induction, or abduction to form interpretations without bias. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions from premises, inductive reasoning forms general conclusions from patterns in data, and abductive reasoning generates hypotheses when evidence is lacking. The document advises avoiding conclusions from single observations and emphasizes using reasoning to analyze observations.
The document provides guidelines for critical decision making. It discusses asking open-ended questions, properly defining problems, analyzing all available evidence even if it contradicts experts, considering assumptions and biases, controlling emotional biases, avoiding oversimplification, considering multiple interpretations, and tolerating uncertainty rather than demanding definitive answers. The key aspects of critical thinking highlighted are questioning preconceptions, evaluating all relevant evidence fairly, and acknowledging the complexities involved in decision making.
This document presents the 12-item Grit Scale used to assess an individual's grit or perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The scale consists of 12 statements where respondents indicate how much each statement is like them using a 5-point scale. Six items are scored such that higher numbers indicate more grit while the other six are reverse scored. Scores are averaged, with higher scores indicating greater grit ranging from 1 (not at all gritty) to 5 (extremely gritty). The scale was developed to provide a concise yet reliable measure of individual differences in grit.
The document discusses Edward de Bono's Six Thinking Hats framework and how it can be applied to doctoral studies. The Six Hats include White (facts), Red (emotions), Black (risks), Yellow (optimism), Green (creativity), and Blue (process). It provides examples of how each hat could be used in areas like communication between faculty and students, objective analysis and evaluation, generating new ideas, and conducting well-rounded research that considers emotions. The framework is presented as a useful code, game, trigger, and template to improve various aspects of the doctoral research process.
The document discusses developing a good research question. It defines a research question as an actual question asked about a topic. It explains that having a research question helps focus one's research by providing an angle on the topic. The document provides guidance on how to create a good research question, such as picking a topic, narrowing it, asking questions, and focusing the question with who, what, where, when. It also outlines how to evaluate if a research question is good by ensuring it focuses on one issue, demands analysis, and uses precise words. Finally, it states that a good research question can be developed into a thesis statement.
How to find documents for your formative assessments?
(Transforming your topic into a search strategy, using a bibliographic database such as PsycINFO).
Your Research Journey: Starting and Completing a Final Year Research ProjectLance Dann
Brighton University lecture for Level 6 (Final Year) Broadcast Media students. This lecture details the stages that students need to undertake to complete a final year research project.
This document outlines 10 scientific attitudes that are important for solving problems:
1. Careful judgment based on facts rather than jumping to conclusions.
2. Creativity in generating original ideas and uncommon solutions.
3. Critical mindedness in evaluating evidence and prioritizing accuracy over other factors.
4. Curiosity in continually learning and understanding why and how things work.
Mrs. Cotter outlines her expectations for her 6th grade English Language Arts class. She will focus on strengthening reading, writing, grammar, and vocabulary skills. She emphasizes creating a risk-free learning environment based on respect and responsibility, where students can express their thoughts while being tolerant of others. Grades will be based on tests, projects, homework, quizzes, and daily activities. Students are responsible for making up any missed work when absent and extra help is available after school on Mondays.
This document provides an introduction to the scientific method for 4th grade science. It explains that testable questions usually begin with "why" and provides an example question. It then outlines the steps of the scientific method, including asking questions, developing a hypothesis, conducting an experiment, analyzing data, drawing a conclusion, and considering what was learned. The scientific method is presented as a way for students to find answers to their questions.
This document provides an introduction to the scientific method for 4th grade science. It explains that testable questions usually begin with "why" and provides an example question. It then outlines the steps of the scientific method, including asking questions, developing a hypothesis, conducting an experiment, analyzing data, drawing a conclusion, and considering what was learned. The scientific method is presented as a way for students to find answers to their questions.
This document asks a series of questions to determine if someone would be suited for a career as a forensic psychologist by addressing if they are good with statistics, teamwork, note-taking, writing, presenting evidence, handling crisis situations, enjoying learning, and counseling those with mental illness. It concludes that answering yes to 6 of the 8 questions asked would indicate the person would make a great forensic psychologist.
Critical thinking involves asking clarifying questions to fully understand concepts, asking for evidence to back up claims, and not being intimidated when pushing for more information. It is not about thinking a lot without focus or being inherently smarter, but rather listening carefully and questioning to gain a deeper understanding. Effective questions acknowledge what is already understood and identify sources of confusion, rather than vague inquiries, to make progress on difficult topics through discussion and evidence.
Science and technology 11 - Course OutlineBryx Sintos
This document outlines the course objectives, content, and marking scheme for a Science and Technology 11 class. The objectives are to explore the interactions between science, technology, and society and to understand how science affects daily life. The course content will cover five main topics - an introduction to science, technology, and society, computers, medicine and health, forensics, and space - as well as optional units suggested by students. Students will be evaluated on attendance and participation (25%), daily assignments (30%), and projects, tests, and quizzes (45%). The goal is for students to gain an appreciation of science and to fulfill their science requirement for graduation.
1. The document discusses a study on students' preferences regarding a GPS (Gifted and Talented Program) intervention program and extended lunch periods.
2. Hypotheses were tested using one sample tests for proportions and tests for independence to analyze students' responses to survey questions.
3. The results found that students did not prefer the GPS intervention program on campus but did prefer longer lunch periods. The variables of thinking they will be in GPS and wanting to be in GPS were found to not be independent.
This document discusses research methods for conducting surveys. It covers topics such as sampling, developing research questions, planning a survey, question types, and analyzing results. Some key points include:
- Sampling involves selecting a subset of a population to study. There are probability/random sampling methods and non-probability/convenience sampling methods.
- When planning a survey, researchers should consider who the respondents will be, what information they want to learn, and how to effectively collect that information.
- Questions should be clear, avoid bias and ambiguity, and not be leading. Common question types include closed-ended, open-ended, and scales.
- Analyzing results includes calculating the margin of error to determine accuracy based
A well-designed questionnaire should be short, simple, and focused. It should minimize bias and maximize responses by making completion easy while obtaining the necessary information to answer the research question. Key aspects of design include using clear, unambiguous questions; closed-format questions when possible; logical question ordering; and piloting the questionnaire first to identify and address any issues.
A well-designed questionnaire should be short, simple, and focused. It should minimize bias and maximize responses to accurately answer the research question. Key aspects of design include using closed-ended questions, clearly worded items, and an order that moves from easy to difficult questions. Piloting is important to identify and address any issues before widespread distribution.
This document provides information on designing questionnaires. It discusses the objectives and types of questionnaires, as well as advantages and disadvantages. Key aspects of questionnaire design covered include determining question order, format, and avoiding bias. Well-designed questionnaires should be concise, use clear language, and minimize potential for misunderstanding through closed-ended questions and clear response options.
PRACTICAL RESEARCH FOR GRAFE 11 STUDENTShansjosiah1
This document discusses sampling and data collection methods used in research. It defines key terms like population, sampling frame, and sample. It also describes different types of sampling, including probability sampling methods like simple random sampling, systematic sampling, and stratified sampling. Non-probability sampling methods such as quota sampling, voluntary sampling, and snowball sampling are also outlined. Common data collection techniques involving observation, interviews, and questionnaires are explained. Specific interview types and ethical considerations for interviews are covered as well.
This document discusses research methods and instrument design. It covers sampling procedures, data gathering, research instruments, and statistical analysis. It focuses on questionnaire design, providing tips for writing clear, unbiased questions. These tips include using simple language, short questions, common terms, and scales. The document emphasizes pretesting questionnaires to identify issues before full data collection.
Egbe, rachel ten things to consider when developing a survey or assessment in...William Kritsonis
This article provides guidelines for developing effective survey instruments for research purposes. It recommends keeping surveys short (1-2 pages), establishing clear goals for the survey, and determining an appropriate sample to survey. The article outlines 10 key things to consider, such as including "don't know" options, sequencing questions logically, and using a variety of question types like multiple choice, open-ended, and rating scales. Following these tips can help researchers efficiently gather accurate data through surveys to inform decision-making.
- Data is a collection of facts that can be qualitative (descriptive information) or quantitative (numerical information). It can come from primary sources through first-hand collection or secondary sources that are already available.
- Common data collection methods include observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentary analysis. Observation involves direct observation while interviews can be structured, semi-structured, or informal. Questionnaires use a set of questions to gather responses.
- Motivation research techniques like word association tests, sentence completion tests, and projective techniques aim to uncover hidden motives through indirect questioning and use of pictures/stories.
The document discusses various tools and methods used for data collection in research. It describes primary and secondary sources of data and some common methods for collecting data like interviews, questionnaires, observation, and various scales. Specific tools are discussed for each method - for interviews these include interview schedules and opinionnaires, questionnaires use tools like attitude scales and Likert scales, and observation uses tools like rating scales and checklists. Guidelines for developing questionnaires and uses of different types of scales are also provided.
Practical Research-Quantitative Research .pptxvinderbassi1208
The document discusses different methods for collecting data for research including questionnaires, tests, interviews, and observation. It provides guidelines for developing and administering questionnaires, the types of test questions, roles for participant observation, and ethical considerations for data collection. The key methods covered are questionnaires, which can gather data from many participants anonymously; tests which assess skills and behaviors; interviews for collecting numeric data on opinions; and observation to study actual events directly while avoiding influencing participants.
The document discusses developing a good research question. It defines a research question as an actual question asked about a topic. It explains that having a research question helps focus one's research by providing an angle on the topic. The document provides guidance on how to create a good research question, such as picking a topic, narrowing it, asking questions, and focusing the question with who, what, where, when. It also outlines how to evaluate if a research question is good by ensuring it focuses on one issue, demands analysis, and uses precise words. Finally, it states that a good research question can be developed into a thesis statement.
How to find documents for your formative assessments?
(Transforming your topic into a search strategy, using a bibliographic database such as PsycINFO).
Your Research Journey: Starting and Completing a Final Year Research ProjectLance Dann
Brighton University lecture for Level 6 (Final Year) Broadcast Media students. This lecture details the stages that students need to undertake to complete a final year research project.
This document outlines 10 scientific attitudes that are important for solving problems:
1. Careful judgment based on facts rather than jumping to conclusions.
2. Creativity in generating original ideas and uncommon solutions.
3. Critical mindedness in evaluating evidence and prioritizing accuracy over other factors.
4. Curiosity in continually learning and understanding why and how things work.
Mrs. Cotter outlines her expectations for her 6th grade English Language Arts class. She will focus on strengthening reading, writing, grammar, and vocabulary skills. She emphasizes creating a risk-free learning environment based on respect and responsibility, where students can express their thoughts while being tolerant of others. Grades will be based on tests, projects, homework, quizzes, and daily activities. Students are responsible for making up any missed work when absent and extra help is available after school on Mondays.
This document provides an introduction to the scientific method for 4th grade science. It explains that testable questions usually begin with "why" and provides an example question. It then outlines the steps of the scientific method, including asking questions, developing a hypothesis, conducting an experiment, analyzing data, drawing a conclusion, and considering what was learned. The scientific method is presented as a way for students to find answers to their questions.
This document provides an introduction to the scientific method for 4th grade science. It explains that testable questions usually begin with "why" and provides an example question. It then outlines the steps of the scientific method, including asking questions, developing a hypothesis, conducting an experiment, analyzing data, drawing a conclusion, and considering what was learned. The scientific method is presented as a way for students to find answers to their questions.
This document asks a series of questions to determine if someone would be suited for a career as a forensic psychologist by addressing if they are good with statistics, teamwork, note-taking, writing, presenting evidence, handling crisis situations, enjoying learning, and counseling those with mental illness. It concludes that answering yes to 6 of the 8 questions asked would indicate the person would make a great forensic psychologist.
Critical thinking involves asking clarifying questions to fully understand concepts, asking for evidence to back up claims, and not being intimidated when pushing for more information. It is not about thinking a lot without focus or being inherently smarter, but rather listening carefully and questioning to gain a deeper understanding. Effective questions acknowledge what is already understood and identify sources of confusion, rather than vague inquiries, to make progress on difficult topics through discussion and evidence.
Science and technology 11 - Course OutlineBryx Sintos
This document outlines the course objectives, content, and marking scheme for a Science and Technology 11 class. The objectives are to explore the interactions between science, technology, and society and to understand how science affects daily life. The course content will cover five main topics - an introduction to science, technology, and society, computers, medicine and health, forensics, and space - as well as optional units suggested by students. Students will be evaluated on attendance and participation (25%), daily assignments (30%), and projects, tests, and quizzes (45%). The goal is for students to gain an appreciation of science and to fulfill their science requirement for graduation.
1. The document discusses a study on students' preferences regarding a GPS (Gifted and Talented Program) intervention program and extended lunch periods.
2. Hypotheses were tested using one sample tests for proportions and tests for independence to analyze students' responses to survey questions.
3. The results found that students did not prefer the GPS intervention program on campus but did prefer longer lunch periods. The variables of thinking they will be in GPS and wanting to be in GPS were found to not be independent.
This document discusses research methods for conducting surveys. It covers topics such as sampling, developing research questions, planning a survey, question types, and analyzing results. Some key points include:
- Sampling involves selecting a subset of a population to study. There are probability/random sampling methods and non-probability/convenience sampling methods.
- When planning a survey, researchers should consider who the respondents will be, what information they want to learn, and how to effectively collect that information.
- Questions should be clear, avoid bias and ambiguity, and not be leading. Common question types include closed-ended, open-ended, and scales.
- Analyzing results includes calculating the margin of error to determine accuracy based
A well-designed questionnaire should be short, simple, and focused. It should minimize bias and maximize responses by making completion easy while obtaining the necessary information to answer the research question. Key aspects of design include using clear, unambiguous questions; closed-format questions when possible; logical question ordering; and piloting the questionnaire first to identify and address any issues.
A well-designed questionnaire should be short, simple, and focused. It should minimize bias and maximize responses to accurately answer the research question. Key aspects of design include using closed-ended questions, clearly worded items, and an order that moves from easy to difficult questions. Piloting is important to identify and address any issues before widespread distribution.
This document provides information on designing questionnaires. It discusses the objectives and types of questionnaires, as well as advantages and disadvantages. Key aspects of questionnaire design covered include determining question order, format, and avoiding bias. Well-designed questionnaires should be concise, use clear language, and minimize potential for misunderstanding through closed-ended questions and clear response options.
PRACTICAL RESEARCH FOR GRAFE 11 STUDENTShansjosiah1
This document discusses sampling and data collection methods used in research. It defines key terms like population, sampling frame, and sample. It also describes different types of sampling, including probability sampling methods like simple random sampling, systematic sampling, and stratified sampling. Non-probability sampling methods such as quota sampling, voluntary sampling, and snowball sampling are also outlined. Common data collection techniques involving observation, interviews, and questionnaires are explained. Specific interview types and ethical considerations for interviews are covered as well.
This document discusses research methods and instrument design. It covers sampling procedures, data gathering, research instruments, and statistical analysis. It focuses on questionnaire design, providing tips for writing clear, unbiased questions. These tips include using simple language, short questions, common terms, and scales. The document emphasizes pretesting questionnaires to identify issues before full data collection.
Egbe, rachel ten things to consider when developing a survey or assessment in...William Kritsonis
This article provides guidelines for developing effective survey instruments for research purposes. It recommends keeping surveys short (1-2 pages), establishing clear goals for the survey, and determining an appropriate sample to survey. The article outlines 10 key things to consider, such as including "don't know" options, sequencing questions logically, and using a variety of question types like multiple choice, open-ended, and rating scales. Following these tips can help researchers efficiently gather accurate data through surveys to inform decision-making.
- Data is a collection of facts that can be qualitative (descriptive information) or quantitative (numerical information). It can come from primary sources through first-hand collection or secondary sources that are already available.
- Common data collection methods include observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentary analysis. Observation involves direct observation while interviews can be structured, semi-structured, or informal. Questionnaires use a set of questions to gather responses.
- Motivation research techniques like word association tests, sentence completion tests, and projective techniques aim to uncover hidden motives through indirect questioning and use of pictures/stories.
The document discusses various tools and methods used for data collection in research. It describes primary and secondary sources of data and some common methods for collecting data like interviews, questionnaires, observation, and various scales. Specific tools are discussed for each method - for interviews these include interview schedules and opinionnaires, questionnaires use tools like attitude scales and Likert scales, and observation uses tools like rating scales and checklists. Guidelines for developing questionnaires and uses of different types of scales are also provided.
Practical Research-Quantitative Research .pptxvinderbassi1208
The document discusses different methods for collecting data for research including questionnaires, tests, interviews, and observation. It provides guidelines for developing and administering questionnaires, the types of test questions, roles for participant observation, and ethical considerations for data collection. The key methods covered are questionnaires, which can gather data from many participants anonymously; tests which assess skills and behaviors; interviews for collecting numeric data on opinions; and observation to study actual events directly while avoiding influencing participants.
This is a modified version of Master Class that Dr Siobhan O'Dwyer delivered at the Griffith University School of Nursing's Annual Research School for postgraduate students.
This document discusses key concepts in research methods. It defines what constitutes a science, including being based on empirical evidence, being objective and falsifiable. It also discusses peer review which ensures research quality, and some of its limitations. Different research designs are examined like experiments, observations and surveys. Ethical issues in research and ways to address them are outlined. The document also covers reliability and validity, important considerations in research quality. Sampling methods and their pros and cons are defined. Finally, it provides guidance on how to structure answers when discussing research methods concepts or studies.
This presentation was created to guide Licensure Exam for Teachers examinees. Tips on how to prepare for the test, PRC application processing, sample previous actual board exam questions and high impacts topics in the LET are provided.
Disclaimer: Statistical figures of board performance and topnotchers are hypothetical. Photos included in this presentation were taken from the internet and are not personally owned by the author.
The study is a descriptive study of current dog trainer practices and preferences.
The study was developed to be used by trainers as a formative assessment by allowing them to refer their clients to an Owner/handler (client) satisfaction survey.
The study would allow the greater dog training community to see how owners/handlers respond to different training methods and equipment.
Game-Changing Audience Research TechniquesBlackbaud
This document discusses low-cost user research methods that non-profits can use to test their websites and improve outcomes. It promotes brief user tests at Starbucks to observe people completing tasks on a website. Card sorting is presented to understand how users organize information. Surveys are suggested to answer specific questions about current users, with tips on keeping them short and analyzing responses. The presentation aims to demonstrate user research can be done easily and cheaply.
This document provides an overview of best practices for writing effective surveys and questionnaires. It discusses key concepts like the difference between surveys and censuses, and surveys and questionnaires. It outlines common issues like sampling, design, analysis, question wording, response methods, and question ordering that should be considered. Best practices are presented such as clearly defining the research goal, verifying that a survey is needed, pretesting the questionnaire, and getting feedback from others. The goal is to help people construct surveys that accurately measure constructs and avoid biases.
This document provides an overview of best practices for writing effective surveys and questionnaires. It discusses key concepts like the difference between surveys and censuses, and surveys and questionnaires. It outlines common issues like sampling, design, analysis, question wording, response methods, and question ordering that should be considered. Best practices are presented such as clearly defining the research goal, verifying that a survey is needed, pretesting the questionnaire, and getting feedback from others. The goal is to help people construct surveys that accurately measure constructs and avoid biases.
The document outlines the 9 main stages of conducting research: 1) Identifying a topic, 2) Background research, 3) Developing objectives, 4) Research strategy, 5) Data collection planning, 6) Data collection, 7) Analysis, 8) Creating a report, and 9) Evaluation. It then provides more details on common data collection methods like interviews, questionnaires, observation, and experiments. Key advice includes having clear objectives, reviewing existing literature, developing ethical and unbiased collection strategies, and analyzing results both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Non-experimental methods involve asking questions to gather information without manipulation. Surveys and questionnaires are common methods that involve collecting large amounts of standardized data from many people through self-reporting. Interviews can be structured or unstructured and use open or closed questions to gather qualitative or quantitative data. Observation is another method where the researcher directly watches and records behaviors without participation.
Similar to How to create a well constructed survey final copy (20)
PDF SubmissionDigital Marketing Institute in NoidaPoojaSaini954651
https://www.safalta.com/online-digital-marketing/advance-digital-marketing-training-in-noidaTop Digital Marketing Institute in Noida: Boost Your Career Fast
[3:29 am, 30/05/2024] +91 83818 43552: Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida also provides advanced classes for individuals seeking to develop their expertise and skills in this field. These classes, led by industry experts with vast experience, focus on specific aspects of digital marketing such as advanced SEO strategies, sophisticated content creation techniques, and data-driven analytics.
EASY TUTORIAL OF HOW TO USE CAPCUT BY: FEBLESS HERNANEFebless Hernane
CapCut is an easy-to-use video editing app perfect for beginners. To start, download and open CapCut on your phone. Tap "New Project" and select the videos or photos you want to edit. You can trim clips by dragging the edges, add text by tapping "Text," and include music by selecting "Audio." Enhance your video with filters and effects from the "Effects" menu. When you're happy with your video, tap the export button to save and share it. CapCut makes video editing simple and fun for everyone!
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdfKnight Moves
Presentations of Bavo Raeymaekers (Project lead youth unemployment at the City of Antwerp), Suzan Martens (Service designer at Knight Moves) and Adriaan De Keersmaeker (Community manager at Talk to C)
during the 'Arena • Young adults in the workplace' conference hosted by Knight Moves.
Fonts play a crucial role in both User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) design. They affect readability, accessibility, aesthetics, and overall user perception.
Technoblade The Legacy of a Minecraft Legend.Techno Merch
Technoblade, born Alex on June 1, 1999, was a legendary Minecraft YouTuber known for his sharp wit and exceptional PvP skills. Starting his channel in 2013, he gained nearly 11 million subscribers. His private battle with metastatic sarcoma ended in June 2022, but his enduring legacy continues to inspire millions.
Explore the essential graphic design tools and software that can elevate your creative projects. Discover industry favorites and innovative solutions for stunning design results.
Revolutionizing the Digital Landscape: Web Development Companies in Indiaamrsoftec1
Discover unparalleled creativity and technical prowess with India's leading web development companies. From custom solutions to e-commerce platforms, harness the expertise of skilled developers at competitive prices. Transform your digital presence, enhance the user experience, and propel your business to new heights with innovative solutions tailored to your needs, all from the heart of India's tech industry.
Decormart Studio is widely recognized as one of the best interior designers in Bangalore, known for their exceptional design expertise and ability to create stunning, functional spaces. With a strong focus on client preferences and timely project delivery, Decormart Studio has built a solid reputation for their innovative and personalized approach to interior design.
Connect Conference 2022: Passive House - Economic and Environmental Solution...TE Studio
Passive House: The Economic and Environmental Solution for Sustainable Real Estate. Lecture by Tim Eian of TE Studio Passive House Design in November 2022 in Minneapolis.
- The Built Environment
- Let's imagine the perfect building
- The Passive House standard
- Why Passive House targets
- Clean Energy Plans?!
- How does Passive House compare and fit in?
- The business case for Passive House real estate
- Tools to quantify the value of Passive House
- What can I do?
- Resources
2. AGENDA
o Why surveys?
o Steps to designing a survey
o Step 1 – Defining the objective
o Step 2 – Creating questions
o Step 3 – Structuring the survey
o Step 4 – Testing and analysis
o Questions?
3. WHY SURVEYS
o Surveys are used frequently… by everybody
o They are an effective tool if designed properly
o Poor design = bad data
The following slides will walk you through how to design a survey in a way that
minimizes bias, and maximizes efficiency and data validity.
4. TYPES OF SURVEYS AND
COLLECTION METHODS
o Descriptive surveys
o A=A, B=B, C=C, ETC.
o Explorative surveys
o A+B=C
Mail/email
Face to face Online
Telephone
9. WRITE YOUR QUESTIONS
o What will the answer to this question tell me?
o Am I asking this question because I am curious about it, or because it is a valid
question supported by existing data?
o Is there a clear purpose to my question?
10. RULES
o Be unambiguous:
o Ambiguous: “How often do you take your dog out?”
o Unambiguous: “How often do you take your dog to the park?”
o Avoid jargon and acronyms
o Avoid double barreled questions:
o “Dogs should be kept on a leash at all times, so laws should be passed to restrain dogs in
parks”
o “Dogs should be kept on a leash at all times.”
o “Laws should be passed to restrain dogs in parks.”
11. o Don’t ask leading or loaded questions:
o “Don’t you agree that dogs should not be allowed off of the leash at the park?”
o Do you agree or disagree that dogs should not be allowed off of the leash at the park?”
o Avoid questions with too many options
o Avoid questions without an ‘out’
Yes/No
Scales without a ‘Neutral’ or ‘I don’t know’ or both
12. TYPES OF QUESTIONS
o Open ended questions
o Yes/No
o Radio button options
o Checklists
o Scales
Strongly
Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
I don’t
know
For the following questions please circle your answer with 1=Once a month, 2=Once a week,
3=Multiple times a week, 4=Daily, 5=Other, please explain in the space below.
1 2 3 4 5Question:
14. STRUCTURING AND
ORGANIZING YOUR
QUESTIONSo Flow from low to high
recall/sensitivity rate
o Keep questions types together
o Keep topics grouped together
o It is better to group topics together
and find new ways to ask a question.
Questions to ‘warm up’
Demographic questions
Questions answered easily
Yes/No/Out
Moderate questions
Radio, Checklist, Scales
High recall, sensitive, or new
information
Open Ended
16. Look for
Inconsistencies
Organizational issues
Areas or points of confusion
Broken rules!
You cannot change a survey once it has been delivered!
17. Based on the above analysis, it is clear that
roughly 60% of dog owners believe that all
owners should keep their dog on a leash at all
times.
While 30% believe that dogs should be kept on a
leash outside of dog parks.
With the remaining 10% claiming that they do
not think that pet owners should not be required
to keep a dog on a leash in any circumstance.
When should Pet Owners be
Required to use a Leash
Leash at all times Leash only in public
Should not require a leash
20. Bernard H., Russell Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications: 2013
Goodman, Elizabeth; Kuniavsky, Mike; Moed Andrea Observing the User
Experience. Elsevier: 2012
Editor's Notes
Surveys are a frequently used tool, and can lead to powerful data if they are designed properly.
They can be used to
inform on a population
Gather further insight
Or validate existing knowledge
However, surveys are oftentimes misused and poorly designed, leading to invalid or misleading data.
Overuse is another issues when it comes to survey deployment, and this is typically a result of poorly design surveys. If you have a poorly designed survey, it will not address you objective and you will have to go back to your sample population with additional questions – hence the overuse.
Therefore, understanding how to design and create effective surveys is critical to using them as a tool in your research
The following slides will walk you through how to design a survey in a way that minimizes bias, and maximizes efficiency and data validity.
Surveys can provide either descriptive or explorative data.
Descriptive data focuses on one variable at a time to characterize a population.
Explorative data, will describe a population by identifying and exploring the relationships between variables in your survey.
For the purposes of this presentation, we will focus on descriptive surveys. This is likely the survey type you will be working with in UX.
There are a number of different ways to distribute surveys.
You can send them through the
mail,
conduct telephone surveys,
have users’ complete online surveys,
or deliver surveys face-to-face.
The latter is my preferred method as it ensures that you will receive a complete survey, and allows participants to ask questions if something is unclear to them.
Regardless of the method of distribution, there are some standard methods and if you will ‘rules’ to follow to create a survey that will increase the reliability of the data collected.
So let’s say you know you want to conduct a survey to better understand how respondents feel about dogs in public.
We are assuming you already have a representative sample population identified – we’ll say it’s dog owners - and you are moving into survey creation.
Utilize qualitative data to give you an idea of what your survey should be asking. Qualitative data gives you an idea about the existing terminology, mental models, behaviors, desires or pain points that exist in your population
Begin with existing work. If you have the opportunity to use existing research to inform your new survey – do it (as long as it isn’t out dated and no longer valid)! If not, then conducting qualitative research before you begin designing a survey should be your first step. I would argue that it should be done regardless of previous work, however sometimes you just don’t have to time to conduct original qualitative research, so using existing work is your next best option.
Either way, if you get the opportunity to conduct qualitative research prior to creating your survey, you can begin with some qualitative methods such as:
Focus groups
Interviews – semi-structured or unstructured
Participatory observation or observational research
This can be done in a short amount of time, or can be a full-fledged research effort.
So now that we have some data to better understand what we need, we can begin to think about our objective
Before you even begin thinking about what questions you want to ask, you need to have a clearly defined objective of which the questions will be structured around.
So building off of our initial goal of better understanding how respondents feel about dogs in public. Let’s say your qualitative data is showing that pet owners frequently take dogs to parks where other activities are occurring. It also tells you that dog owners have differing of opinions when it comes to their responsibility for their dog in public. We can then focus our objective to address the following:
What should pet owners take into consideration while at the park with their dog?
Begin by writing all of the questions you can think of, don’t worry about structure, just get them all written down.
After you have written down all of the questions you can think of, start to edit them. Meaning begin to assess whether each question will lead you to answering your objective.
For example, if you are looking at a question ask yourself, “What will the answer to the question give me?” “Am I asking it because I am curious about it, or because it is a valid question supported by data?” AND “is there a clear purpose to my question.”
Referring back to your qualitative data can also help you edit out your questions. Does the data support the question you are asking?
Once your questions are written, but before you can start to place them into question types or styles, make sure that your questions follow these rules:
Be unambiguous. “How often do you take your dog out” can be ambiguous – take your dog to the park, the vet, your friend’s house? Where are you taking the dog? You need to make sure you are clear and direct, if respondents can interpret a question differently from what you intend to ask, they likely will.
Avoid jargon and acronyms
Unless you are 100% confident that your population will be familiar with these questions, avoid them, and spell acronyms out at the first time.
Do not use double barreled questions:
Double barreled questions really asks two questions in one. A respondent may agree or disagree with the first half of the question , but then agree or disagree with the second half – how do you know which half of the question they are agreeing or disagreeing with?
Do not use loaded or leading questions:
Leading questions will bias responses as they lead or bait informants to provide you with the answer you want
Questions with too many options – this can overwhelm respondents and lead to incorrect data
Provide your respondents with an out – meaning give them the opportunity to provide their own information, or select a neutral or ‘I don’t know’ answer. This will cause less bias in your answers, as a question that only gives respondents the option between yes and no, does not give them an out, and can lead to misleading data as respondents would rather give you an answer than not.
If your questions adhere to the rules we just laid out, you can now begin to structure them into actual survey questions
After you have written down every question you can think of, it is now time to structure them into question types. There are a number of types of questions you can ask in your survey.
If appropriate, you can have a survey with the same types of questions, or a survey with a combination of these questions, it depends on what you want to know and how that information is best gathered. Question types:
Open ended
Yes/No
Radio button questions
Checklist
Scales – such as a likert scales
When using scales, always explain how you want the respondent to answer. For example, if your scale has the answers written out in the scale itself, then little to no direction is necessary. However, for numbered scales, or scales without the answers directly in the scale, directions must be given as to how the respondent should answer each question and what each step of the scale stands for.
As mentioned in the previous slide; no matter which question type you use, you always have to make sure you give your respondent an ‘out’. For example, a question that only gives respondents the option between yes and no, does not give them an out, and can lead to misleading data as respondents would rather give you an answer than not.
Rather than yes/no, ask your respondents yes, no, I don’t know, and other with a field for open ended entry. This gives you information regarding whether respondents know about the information you’re asking them, and gives you an opportunity to learn about other variables you have not taken into account.
As far as the radio button, checklist, and scale options, you still want to give an out in ways appropriate for the question type.
Radio buttons or scales can both have a neutral option, and an I don’t know option. I like to add other options wherever possible, so that could be an option for radio button and check list options.
Open ended questions have an automatic out
Now that you have all of your questions, it is time to structure them into a survey. This typically happens simultaneously with your question creation. As you create your questions types, you will start to put questions next to one another and loosely structure your entire survey. However, there is still room for editing and reorganizing. It is surprising how important the flow of a survey is, and even with what I think are well structured and organized surveys, I still have to edit and change question types when I start working on the flow of the survey.
That being said, it is important to make sure your survey flows from low to high recall/sensitivity rate, that topics are grouped together, and that like question types are kept together.
Make certain that you are not asking your respondent to jump between topics throughout your survey
For example: we wouldn’t want to ask respondents three radio button questions about their activities in the park, followed by a radio button question asking about what type of dog food they use just so we can keep all of the radio button questions together.
It is better to group topics together and find new ways to ask a question, then it is to jump topics. I am mentioning this a lot, because it is very important and frequently overlooked. As Jumping topics reduces recall rate and can lead to misleading data – not to mention it irritates your respondents.
To begin, you want to give your respondents a chance to ‘warm up’ before you get to any sensitive or difficult questions, or questions that may require higher recall rates. This is because if you don’t give your respondent’s time to think about the topic you are asking them about, they may not recall deeper insights that they would if you were to slowly get them into the harder questions. It is similar to a movie in that you can’t start at the end even though that is what you are watching the movie for – you want to know how it ends. But if you just see the ending you don’t know what is happening and aren’t able to make much sense about what is put in front of you.
Additionally, respondents may be offended or put off if you begin asking more sensitive or higher recall questions right off the bat. This is particularly true for sensitive topic issues. Starting the survey off with the deeper questions you are looking to answer can also scare your respondent off – they see the first question and how much cognitive stress it puts on them and they can only attribute the rest of the survey will follow this same pattern.
To avoid this it is best to start your survey off with the ‘lighter’ questions such as demographic questions.
After demographic questions, your respondent is now ‘in’ the survey and you can begin to ask questions that will lead them through the survey.
Example of a good flow would be as follows:
Demographics
Questions that are answered easily are typically heavily supported by your qualitative research – you expect that respondents will find these questions easy to answer, but it also introduces them to the topic you will be exploring –
Typically yes/no questions
Moderate questions – questions that came up in qualitative research, but you would like to explore in more detail
Typically radio buttons, check lists, and scales
Finally, the high recall, sensitive, or new information questions.
Typically open ended questions because we may not have as much information about these topics going into the survey.
Once your questions are written, and the design of your survey is complete, it is time to test run your survey.
One of the best ways to find out if you have any inconsistencies, organizational issues, areas or points of confusion or, broken any of the rules for asking questions, is to ask a coworker – or multiple coworkers – to take the survey for you. It would be best to provide them with a bit of background first, but if they are able to understand the survey and do not run into any obstacles without complete domain knowledge, then your survey should be good to go!
Before you send your survey to your sample population, however, make sure you are 100% happy with it – or as close as you can be – because you cannot change a survey once it has been delivered. This will invalidate your data and prevent comparison between your variables.
Descriptive analysis uses data visualization – such as graphs, data tables, and summaries to understand and describe the data.
Descriptive analysis is not intended to make inferences about anything that is outside of your data set – meaning you can’t infer something about the rest of the world simply based on the data from your sample population and survey results.
Your analysis should include univariate analysis – analysis that focuses on examining individual independent variables in detail. This is the easiest analysis to do by hand as you are simply looking for patterns in data for data visualizations. Univariate analysis deals with one set of data. For example if you ask when pet owners should be required to keep their dog on a leash, and provide respondents with options that are exhaustive to your question, it is possible that you will get the following breakdown in which
60% of dog owners believe owners should keep their dogs on a leash at all times
30% believe that they should only have to keep their dog on a leash outside of dog parks
and 10% of dog owners believe that they should never be required to keep their dog on a leash.
You are looking at this question independently of the other questions you have asked, and you are not comparing that variable with another.
When analyzing any open ended questions, you will want to look for common patterns, themes, or words that your respondents have used to answer your question. This will tell you whether or not there is commonality among your respondents, and can provide you with rich insight into the actual cultural constructs and domains of your respondents.
Other types of analysis include:
Bivariate (looking at associations between pairs of variables) and
Multivariate (understanding the effects of more than one independent variable at a time on a dependent variable) are best carried out with a statistical analysis tool such as SPSS which can tell you – among other things - if there is actually statistical significance between variables and associations or not. Again, this type of heavier analysis may not be necessary for your work in UX as it is.