Developing & Measuring Open Leadership StrategiesCharlene Li
Part 2 of four part series about the ideas in the book "Open Leadership" by Charlene Li. Presented on May 7, 2010. For more information about the book, visit open-leadership.com.
Developing & Measuring Open Leadership StrategiesCharlene Li
Part 2 of four part series about the ideas in the book "Open Leadership" by Charlene Li. Presented on May 7, 2010. For more information about the book, visit open-leadership.com.
Human Capital Growth Webinar: Take your performance management from hate to l...Human Capital Growth
View this webinar to make impactful choices when redesigning your performance management process.
http://www.humancapitalgrowth.com/take-your-performance-management-from-hate-to-love.html
1
Human Resources
Strategic Planning
HRM 329
Week 2
people and planning…what a great combination
- anonymous
Claremont Graduate University
School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences
Human Resources Management
Question for discussion:
“Why do business leaders not see HR as KEY to
today’s people strategies?”
Some say HR is being pulled in two different directions.
One part of the future is a function that is focused on
administrative and operational efficiency, and the other is an
emerging people management function that may reside in
the HR department or in business operations.
- Patrick Kiger
Workforce Magazine, May 2015
Do you agree or disagree with the above quote?
Why so?
Introduction
The focal point is between Strategic Management and
Strategic Human Resource Management.
The fundamental focus and key question is:
“How should firms
effectively manage people
to support a selected organizational strategy,
leading to a competitive advantage based upon
the contributions made by the organizational
participants.”
Introduction
Definition
Strategic Human Resource Planning (SHRP) is a synergistic, systematic
process intersecting strategic management and human
resource management to bring about effective and satisfied
Human Capital for one’s organization.
Process
The SHRP process is pivotal for understanding how a firm effectively
manages people, to support one’s organizational strategy, and create a
competitive advantage.
Strategic Human Resources
2
A Visual Model for Strategic Human Resource Planning
Customer Needs
Determining the Org Climate
Fulfilling Human Capital Needs
Acquiring Human Capital
On-boarding Human Capital
Developing Human Capital
Retaining Human Capital
Metrics/Assessment
Key Strategies - Objectives - Allocation of Resources
Products, Programs, Services
Vision, Mission & Values
The
S
H
R
P
P
rocess
What does my organization say and do that truly demonstrates
people are a vital asset to our organization?
Does my organization have a clear vision, mission and set of values? …culture?
Does my organization regularly conduct SWOT or other analysis to identify the
opportunities and issues inside and outside our organization?
Does my organization first, as a whole and departmentally, set regular goals that
are adhered to?
Does my organization display a managerial attitude that the HR department is a
“vital evil”, “gets in the way”, is administratively and functionally necessary or ?
What are examples of the managerial attitudes, comments and actions
that support my thoughts? THIS IS KEY and overrides “LIP SERVICE.”
What do I believe is the “human capital value determination”factor for my
organization on a scale of 1 though 10?
Determining the Organizational Climate Towards Your Human Capital
Climate Survey – ABC Company Partial Sample Ralph Stayer and Johnsonville Sausage – Strategy Thoughts
3
Johnsonville Sausage…WHO?
Evidence-base.
A description of the 2015 business environment and the need for value creation through people.
Perceptions on HR and its priorities
Emerging models of HR
A HR strategy approach.
www.mantle.co.nz
1Running Head ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE .docxrobert345678
1
Running Head: ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization structure
Shemeko Hopkins
MGTCB/526
University Of Phoenix
2
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization structure
Introduction
An organizational structure is a system that shows or showcases how particular activities are
directed by the company, for the company to achieve its goals. These activities can include laws,
responsibilities, and roles. (Bertacchini, et al. 2018) The importance of the organizational structure
is to determine how information flows between various levels in the organization. For this
assignment, I am going to create the organizational structure that I will like my organization to use.
Which is a hierarchical structure because my organization is large. Explanation of the
organizational chart, analysis of the organization chart based on Porter five forces, analysis of the
current contingency leadership model, leadership model recommendation, other identified actions
recommendation, and finally the information literacy.
3
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization chart
The organizational structure I will recommend for my organization to use is hierarchical.
Hierarchical organization structure is an organization construction where each unit in the
organization, excluding one is subordinate to a sole other units. In a business, the hierarchy
commonly comprises of particular power at the top with the following stages of power below
Board of directors
CEO
Financial
accounting
Project
manager
HR manager
Purchasing
manager
Marketing
director
Logistics
manager
Accountant
Cashier
Section
chief
Documenter
Assistant HR
manager
Materials
Necessities
Marketing
Sales
Purchase
manager
Maintenanc
e
Manager
Security
manager
Driver
4
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
them. (Harris, et al. 2019) This organizational structure is important because it will assist the
employees to comprehend numerous stages of leadership. This is since administration roles are
extra plainly described in this class of pyramid assembly. In having numerous levels of control,
processes run extra efficiently.
In my organization structure; my organization is headed by the board of directors, the main
responsibility of the board of directors is to strategy and manage goals and goals for the short and
long term good for the business and put devices in place to watch the development the aims. In this
respect, the board of directors must appraisal, comprehend and deliberate the business goals. Under
them is the C.E.O, the main role of the CEO is to manage the company's overall operations. They
are capable of delegating and directing agendas, driving profitability, and managing company
organizational structure, strategy and communicating with the board.
My or.
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with the company’s str.docxhelzerpatrina
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with
the company’s strategy – and we need
to fi x that. Someone in your organization
has the mandate to walk into any offi ce,
speak those words, and spark some sort
of transformation. Maybe it’s the CEO and
‘‘
t S
A
ar
o
n
G
o
o
d
m
an
THE CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER
by R. Timothy S. Breene, Paul F. Nunes, and Walter E. Shill
‘‘
W
84 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
1580 Breene.indd 841580 Breene.indd 84 9/5/07 9:07:50 PM9/5/07 9:07:50 PM
hbr.org | October 2007 | Harvard Business Review 85
1580 Breene.indd 851580 Breene.indd 85 9/5/07 9:08:04 PM9/5/07 9:08:04 PM
The Chief Strategy Offi cer
86 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
the CEO only. That’s the traditional model, after all – vision,
planning, and directives fl ow from the very top, and people
at all levels of the organization act.
But it may be that a different C-level executive bears the
burden of strategy execution in your company – a senior
leader like AIG’s Brian Schreiber. He’s been the strategy
chief under two CEOs at the insurance giant. As senior
vice president of strategic planning during Maurice “Hank”
Greenberg’s tenure, Schreiber’s focus was on implementing
investment decisions and acquiring companies selected by
the management team. Under the new CEO, Martin Sul-
livan, Schreiber’s role has expanded to include formalizing
the company’s strategic-planning processes, forging new
working relationships and synergies across the organization,
and establishing greater transparency and accountability for
those people carrying out the company’s strategy. Nowadays,
Schreiber says, the successful creation and execution of strat-
egy requires not only good processes but also the ability to
make quick decisions. So he also considers himself the point
person for assessing whether strategic initiatives, at all levels
of the organization, are in line with the company’s standards
and objectives.
Schreiber’s experience, while impressive, is not unique.
Our research and many years of experience working with
leaders in large organizations confi rm that CEOs are for-
mally handing the reins of strategy execution to individuals
known by a variety of titles but with increasing frequency as
“chief strategy offi cers.” In the past few years, the number of
CSO appointments has surged. Interviews with executive re-
cruiters point to the growing prevalence of this role in many
industries, and CSOs are already serving large multinational
companies around the world.
Companies are adding CSOs to their management teams
(or at least considering doing so) for several reasons. Start
with changes to the business landscape – complex organiza-
tional structures, rapid globalization, new regulations, the
struggle to innovate – that make it ever more diffi cult for
CEOs to be on top of everything, even an area as important ...
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with the company’s str.docxmecklenburgstrelitzh
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with
the company’s strategy – and we need
to fi x that. Someone in your organization
has the mandate to walk into any offi ce,
speak those words, and spark some sort
of transformation. Maybe it’s the CEO and
‘‘
t S
A
ar
o
n
G
o
o
d
m
an
THE CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER
by R. Timothy S. Breene, Paul F. Nunes, and Walter E. Shill
‘‘
W
84 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
1580 Breene.indd 841580 Breene.indd 84 9/5/07 9:07:50 PM9/5/07 9:07:50 PM
hbr.org | October 2007 | Harvard Business Review 85
1580 Breene.indd 851580 Breene.indd 85 9/5/07 9:08:04 PM9/5/07 9:08:04 PM
The Chief Strategy Offi cer
86 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
the CEO only. That’s the traditional model, after all – vision,
planning, and directives fl ow from the very top, and people
at all levels of the organization act.
But it may be that a different C-level executive bears the
burden of strategy execution in your company – a senior
leader like AIG’s Brian Schreiber. He’s been the strategy
chief under two CEOs at the insurance giant. As senior
vice president of strategic planning during Maurice “Hank”
Greenberg’s tenure, Schreiber’s focus was on implementing
investment decisions and acquiring companies selected by
the management team. Under the new CEO, Martin Sul-
livan, Schreiber’s role has expanded to include formalizing
the company’s strategic-planning processes, forging new
working relationships and synergies across the organization,
and establishing greater transparency and accountability for
those people carrying out the company’s strategy. Nowadays,
Schreiber says, the successful creation and execution of strat-
egy requires not only good processes but also the ability to
make quick decisions. So he also considers himself the point
person for assessing whether strategic initiatives, at all levels
of the organization, are in line with the company’s standards
and objectives.
Schreiber’s experience, while impressive, is not unique.
Our research and many years of experience working with
leaders in large organizations confi rm that CEOs are for-
mally handing the reins of strategy execution to individuals
known by a variety of titles but with increasing frequency as
“chief strategy offi cers.” In the past few years, the number of
CSO appointments has surged. Interviews with executive re-
cruiters point to the growing prevalence of this role in many
industries, and CSOs are already serving large multinational
companies around the world.
Companies are adding CSOs to their management teams
(or at least considering doing so) for several reasons. Start
with changes to the business landscape – complex organiza-
tional structures, rapid globalization, new regulations, the
struggle to innovate – that make it ever more diffi cult for
CEOs to be on top of everything, even an area as important .
Program secondment (detasering) bagi organisasi asal dan tuan rumah dia terdapat tiga temuan yang strategis antara lain:
1. How do secondments affect the different parties?
a. Benefits to secondees
meningkatkan pengetahuan dan motivasi
meningkatkan keterlibatan pekerjaan menuju tujuan organsiasi yang sama
b. Career Development
mentransfer informasi terkini
memperoleh pengalaman kerja dengan ragam lingkungan
c. General/Specifik Skills Development
media berbagi pengetahuan dan pengalaman
mengembangkan jalur karir
d. Knowledge Increment
meningkatkan kepercayaan diri
mempelajari peran baru yang berbeda
e. Motivation and Engagement
memotivasi berlajar lebih giat
mendorong pertumbuhan antar pegawai
f. Network Development
menciptakan hubungan dan koneksi
membawa pengalaman dan wawasan
2. Benefits to the host organizations
a. Diverse Skills coming from Secondees
mengembangkan kemampuan kolektorat
memperoleh informasi langsung kebutuhan organisasi
b. Expertise Borrowing
membawa keahlian pegawai ke organisasi tuan rumah
memacu kedua belah pihak (organisasi) melakukan evaluasi untuk mengembangan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kualitas
3. Benefits to the home organizations
a. Kowledge transfer
solusi pemecahan transfer knowledge yang sulit
alternatif dalam menggabungkan pengetahuan baru
b. Relationships/Collaborations
berkembangnya hubungan kelembagaan
memberikan peluang berharga bagi pegawai
Aturan pALING LENGKAP Manajemen ASN_pns _sESUAI_NSPK_SLIDE SHARE.pdfDr. Zar Rdj
IMPELEMENTASI MANAJEMEN APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA BERDASARKAN NPSPK (Norma, Standar, Prosedur, dan Kriteria) MELALUI 18 ELEMEN PENGUKURAN DARI
PENYUSUNAN DAN PENETAPAN KEBUTUHAN ASN
PENGADAAN ASN
PENGANGKATAN ASNSEP
PANGKAT
MUTASI
JABATAN
PENGEMBANGAN KARIER ASN
POLA KARIER
PENGGAJIAN, TUNJANGAN, DAN FASILITAS
PENGHARGAAN
JAMINAN PENSIUN DAN JAMINAN HARI TUA
PERLINDUNGAN
PENILAIAN KINERJA
CUTI
KODE ETIK
DISIPLIN
PEMBERHENTIAN
PENSIUN
ANGKA KREDIT
STANDAR KOMPETENSI JABATAN
WASDAL IMPLEMENTASI NSPK MANAJEMEN ASN DI INSTANSI PEMERINTAH
More Related Content
Similar to How to build a resilient organization for sustained advantage hchp
Human Capital Growth Webinar: Take your performance management from hate to l...Human Capital Growth
View this webinar to make impactful choices when redesigning your performance management process.
http://www.humancapitalgrowth.com/take-your-performance-management-from-hate-to-love.html
1
Human Resources
Strategic Planning
HRM 329
Week 2
people and planning…what a great combination
- anonymous
Claremont Graduate University
School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences
Human Resources Management
Question for discussion:
“Why do business leaders not see HR as KEY to
today’s people strategies?”
Some say HR is being pulled in two different directions.
One part of the future is a function that is focused on
administrative and operational efficiency, and the other is an
emerging people management function that may reside in
the HR department or in business operations.
- Patrick Kiger
Workforce Magazine, May 2015
Do you agree or disagree with the above quote?
Why so?
Introduction
The focal point is between Strategic Management and
Strategic Human Resource Management.
The fundamental focus and key question is:
“How should firms
effectively manage people
to support a selected organizational strategy,
leading to a competitive advantage based upon
the contributions made by the organizational
participants.”
Introduction
Definition
Strategic Human Resource Planning (SHRP) is a synergistic, systematic
process intersecting strategic management and human
resource management to bring about effective and satisfied
Human Capital for one’s organization.
Process
The SHRP process is pivotal for understanding how a firm effectively
manages people, to support one’s organizational strategy, and create a
competitive advantage.
Strategic Human Resources
2
A Visual Model for Strategic Human Resource Planning
Customer Needs
Determining the Org Climate
Fulfilling Human Capital Needs
Acquiring Human Capital
On-boarding Human Capital
Developing Human Capital
Retaining Human Capital
Metrics/Assessment
Key Strategies - Objectives - Allocation of Resources
Products, Programs, Services
Vision, Mission & Values
The
S
H
R
P
P
rocess
What does my organization say and do that truly demonstrates
people are a vital asset to our organization?
Does my organization have a clear vision, mission and set of values? …culture?
Does my organization regularly conduct SWOT or other analysis to identify the
opportunities and issues inside and outside our organization?
Does my organization first, as a whole and departmentally, set regular goals that
are adhered to?
Does my organization display a managerial attitude that the HR department is a
“vital evil”, “gets in the way”, is administratively and functionally necessary or ?
What are examples of the managerial attitudes, comments and actions
that support my thoughts? THIS IS KEY and overrides “LIP SERVICE.”
What do I believe is the “human capital value determination”factor for my
organization on a scale of 1 though 10?
Determining the Organizational Climate Towards Your Human Capital
Climate Survey – ABC Company Partial Sample Ralph Stayer and Johnsonville Sausage – Strategy Thoughts
3
Johnsonville Sausage…WHO?
Evidence-base.
A description of the 2015 business environment and the need for value creation through people.
Perceptions on HR and its priorities
Emerging models of HR
A HR strategy approach.
www.mantle.co.nz
1Running Head ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE .docxrobert345678
1
Running Head: ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization structure
Shemeko Hopkins
MGTCB/526
University Of Phoenix
2
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization structure
Introduction
An organizational structure is a system that shows or showcases how particular activities are
directed by the company, for the company to achieve its goals. These activities can include laws,
responsibilities, and roles. (Bertacchini, et al. 2018) The importance of the organizational structure
is to determine how information flows between various levels in the organization. For this
assignment, I am going to create the organizational structure that I will like my organization to use.
Which is a hierarchical structure because my organization is large. Explanation of the
organizational chart, analysis of the organization chart based on Porter five forces, analysis of the
current contingency leadership model, leadership model recommendation, other identified actions
recommendation, and finally the information literacy.
3
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Organization chart
The organizational structure I will recommend for my organization to use is hierarchical.
Hierarchical organization structure is an organization construction where each unit in the
organization, excluding one is subordinate to a sole other units. In a business, the hierarchy
commonly comprises of particular power at the top with the following stages of power below
Board of directors
CEO
Financial
accounting
Project
manager
HR manager
Purchasing
manager
Marketing
director
Logistics
manager
Accountant
Cashier
Section
chief
Documenter
Assistant HR
manager
Materials
Necessities
Marketing
Sales
Purchase
manager
Maintenanc
e
Manager
Security
manager
Driver
4
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
them. (Harris, et al. 2019) This organizational structure is important because it will assist the
employees to comprehend numerous stages of leadership. This is since administration roles are
extra plainly described in this class of pyramid assembly. In having numerous levels of control,
processes run extra efficiently.
In my organization structure; my organization is headed by the board of directors, the main
responsibility of the board of directors is to strategy and manage goals and goals for the short and
long term good for the business and put devices in place to watch the development the aims. In this
respect, the board of directors must appraisal, comprehend and deliberate the business goals. Under
them is the C.E.O, the main role of the CEO is to manage the company's overall operations. They
are capable of delegating and directing agendas, driving profitability, and managing company
organizational structure, strategy and communicating with the board.
My or.
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with the company’s str.docxhelzerpatrina
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with
the company’s strategy – and we need
to fi x that. Someone in your organization
has the mandate to walk into any offi ce,
speak those words, and spark some sort
of transformation. Maybe it’s the CEO and
‘‘
t S
A
ar
o
n
G
o
o
d
m
an
THE CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER
by R. Timothy S. Breene, Paul F. Nunes, and Walter E. Shill
‘‘
W
84 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
1580 Breene.indd 841580 Breene.indd 84 9/5/07 9:07:50 PM9/5/07 9:07:50 PM
hbr.org | October 2007 | Harvard Business Review 85
1580 Breene.indd 851580 Breene.indd 85 9/5/07 9:08:04 PM9/5/07 9:08:04 PM
The Chief Strategy Offi cer
86 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
the CEO only. That’s the traditional model, after all – vision,
planning, and directives fl ow from the very top, and people
at all levels of the organization act.
But it may be that a different C-level executive bears the
burden of strategy execution in your company – a senior
leader like AIG’s Brian Schreiber. He’s been the strategy
chief under two CEOs at the insurance giant. As senior
vice president of strategic planning during Maurice “Hank”
Greenberg’s tenure, Schreiber’s focus was on implementing
investment decisions and acquiring companies selected by
the management team. Under the new CEO, Martin Sul-
livan, Schreiber’s role has expanded to include formalizing
the company’s strategic-planning processes, forging new
working relationships and synergies across the organization,
and establishing greater transparency and accountability for
those people carrying out the company’s strategy. Nowadays,
Schreiber says, the successful creation and execution of strat-
egy requires not only good processes but also the ability to
make quick decisions. So he also considers himself the point
person for assessing whether strategic initiatives, at all levels
of the organization, are in line with the company’s standards
and objectives.
Schreiber’s experience, while impressive, is not unique.
Our research and many years of experience working with
leaders in large organizations confi rm that CEOs are for-
mally handing the reins of strategy execution to individuals
known by a variety of titles but with increasing frequency as
“chief strategy offi cers.” In the past few years, the number of
CSO appointments has surged. Interviews with executive re-
cruiters point to the growing prevalence of this role in many
industries, and CSOs are already serving large multinational
companies around the world.
Companies are adding CSOs to their management teams
(or at least considering doing so) for several reasons. Start
with changes to the business landscape – complex organiza-
tional structures, rapid globalization, new regulations, the
struggle to innovate – that make it ever more diffi cult for
CEOs to be on top of everything, even an area as important ...
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with the company’s str.docxmecklenburgstrelitzh
What we’ve been doing isn’t in line with
the company’s strategy – and we need
to fi x that. Someone in your organization
has the mandate to walk into any offi ce,
speak those words, and spark some sort
of transformation. Maybe it’s the CEO and
‘‘
t S
A
ar
o
n
G
o
o
d
m
an
THE CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER
by R. Timothy S. Breene, Paul F. Nunes, and Walter E. Shill
‘‘
W
84 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
1580 Breene.indd 841580 Breene.indd 84 9/5/07 9:07:50 PM9/5/07 9:07:50 PM
hbr.org | October 2007 | Harvard Business Review 85
1580 Breene.indd 851580 Breene.indd 85 9/5/07 9:08:04 PM9/5/07 9:08:04 PM
The Chief Strategy Offi cer
86 Harvard Business Review | October 2007 | hbr.org
the CEO only. That’s the traditional model, after all – vision,
planning, and directives fl ow from the very top, and people
at all levels of the organization act.
But it may be that a different C-level executive bears the
burden of strategy execution in your company – a senior
leader like AIG’s Brian Schreiber. He’s been the strategy
chief under two CEOs at the insurance giant. As senior
vice president of strategic planning during Maurice “Hank”
Greenberg’s tenure, Schreiber’s focus was on implementing
investment decisions and acquiring companies selected by
the management team. Under the new CEO, Martin Sul-
livan, Schreiber’s role has expanded to include formalizing
the company’s strategic-planning processes, forging new
working relationships and synergies across the organization,
and establishing greater transparency and accountability for
those people carrying out the company’s strategy. Nowadays,
Schreiber says, the successful creation and execution of strat-
egy requires not only good processes but also the ability to
make quick decisions. So he also considers himself the point
person for assessing whether strategic initiatives, at all levels
of the organization, are in line with the company’s standards
and objectives.
Schreiber’s experience, while impressive, is not unique.
Our research and many years of experience working with
leaders in large organizations confi rm that CEOs are for-
mally handing the reins of strategy execution to individuals
known by a variety of titles but with increasing frequency as
“chief strategy offi cers.” In the past few years, the number of
CSO appointments has surged. Interviews with executive re-
cruiters point to the growing prevalence of this role in many
industries, and CSOs are already serving large multinational
companies around the world.
Companies are adding CSOs to their management teams
(or at least considering doing so) for several reasons. Start
with changes to the business landscape – complex organiza-
tional structures, rapid globalization, new regulations, the
struggle to innovate – that make it ever more diffi cult for
CEOs to be on top of everything, even an area as important .
Similar to How to build a resilient organization for sustained advantage hchp (20)
Program secondment (detasering) bagi organisasi asal dan tuan rumah dia terdapat tiga temuan yang strategis antara lain:
1. How do secondments affect the different parties?
a. Benefits to secondees
meningkatkan pengetahuan dan motivasi
meningkatkan keterlibatan pekerjaan menuju tujuan organsiasi yang sama
b. Career Development
mentransfer informasi terkini
memperoleh pengalaman kerja dengan ragam lingkungan
c. General/Specifik Skills Development
media berbagi pengetahuan dan pengalaman
mengembangkan jalur karir
d. Knowledge Increment
meningkatkan kepercayaan diri
mempelajari peran baru yang berbeda
e. Motivation and Engagement
memotivasi berlajar lebih giat
mendorong pertumbuhan antar pegawai
f. Network Development
menciptakan hubungan dan koneksi
membawa pengalaman dan wawasan
2. Benefits to the host organizations
a. Diverse Skills coming from Secondees
mengembangkan kemampuan kolektorat
memperoleh informasi langsung kebutuhan organisasi
b. Expertise Borrowing
membawa keahlian pegawai ke organisasi tuan rumah
memacu kedua belah pihak (organisasi) melakukan evaluasi untuk mengembangan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kualitas
3. Benefits to the home organizations
a. Kowledge transfer
solusi pemecahan transfer knowledge yang sulit
alternatif dalam menggabungkan pengetahuan baru
b. Relationships/Collaborations
berkembangnya hubungan kelembagaan
memberikan peluang berharga bagi pegawai
Aturan pALING LENGKAP Manajemen ASN_pns _sESUAI_NSPK_SLIDE SHARE.pdfDr. Zar Rdj
IMPELEMENTASI MANAJEMEN APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA BERDASARKAN NPSPK (Norma, Standar, Prosedur, dan Kriteria) MELALUI 18 ELEMEN PENGUKURAN DARI
PENYUSUNAN DAN PENETAPAN KEBUTUHAN ASN
PENGADAAN ASN
PENGANGKATAN ASNSEP
PANGKAT
MUTASI
JABATAN
PENGEMBANGAN KARIER ASN
POLA KARIER
PENGGAJIAN, TUNJANGAN, DAN FASILITAS
PENGHARGAAN
JAMINAN PENSIUN DAN JAMINAN HARI TUA
PERLINDUNGAN
PENILAIAN KINERJA
CUTI
KODE ETIK
DISIPLIN
PEMBERHENTIAN
PENSIUN
ANGKA KREDIT
STANDAR KOMPETENSI JABATAN
WASDAL IMPLEMENTASI NSPK MANAJEMEN ASN DI INSTANSI PEMERINTAH
Dengan siklus perubahan yang begitu radikal dan gelombang digitalisasi yang melipatgandakan kecepatan secara eksponensial, maka kehidupan manusia di berbagai bidang mengalami goncangan, Dunia mengalami perubahan di mana perkembangan teknologi tidak lagi mengikuti pertumbuhan linear namun pertumbuhan eksponensial. Perubahan ini memungkinkan invansi teknologi yang transformatif menjadi lebih cepat dibandingkan proses inovasi yang sudah ada sehingga menimbulkan tantangan drastis bagi dunia bisnis, pemerintah dan perilaku masyarakat.
Oleh karena itu dalam mengatasi disrupsi segala aspek diperlukan Fungsi Audit Internal yang Agile atau lincah yang dapat mempersiapkan dalam membangun kemungkinan ada gangguan fenomena disrupsi dalam siklus perencanaan dan penilaian risiko dan Fungsi Auditor Internal yang Adaptif, fleksibel dalam menciptakan mekanisme proses dan pelaporan
Sebagai Auditor Internal, apakah kita sudah siap….?
Prinsip yang harus dimiliki Audit Internal saat ini antara lain:
1. Agility (Kelincahan)
2. Real-time risks & controls monitoring (Pemantauan risiko & kontrol waktu nyata)
3. Dynamic risk assessments (Penilaian risiko dinamis)
4. Effective leveraging of data & advanced technology (Memanfaatkan data & teknologi canggih secara efektif)
Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Memediasi Pengaruh Integritas, Kompetensi Dan Leader...Dr. Zar Rdj
1. Indikator kualitas laporan hasil audit pada variabel efektivitas kerja memiliki nilai terendah di 3.06 (kategori cukup). Ini terjadi kemungkinan karena auditor dalam melaksanakan audit kurang memahami bisnis proses yang ada pada auditan sehingga tingkat responsifitas auditor dalam membaca kebutuhan auditan kurang maksimal, dimana auditor lebih fokus kepada aspek kepatuhan saja. Maka disarankan agar auditor dapat mengeskplorasi lebih secara holistik proses bisnis yang dimiliki auditan serta perlu didukungnya peran lebih dari manajemen terhadap auditor untuk dapat terlibat dalam berbagai rangkaian proses bisnis auditan, sehingga auditor dapat memberikan informasi secara oversight, insight dan foresight.
2. Indikator sikap bijaksana & tanggung jawab pada variabel integritas memiliki nilai terendah 2.67 (kategori tidak baik). Ini terjadi kemungkinan karena banyaknya pertimbangan yang dimiliki auditor dalam mengungkap permasalahan secara seksama dan kurangnya tanggung jawab atas keputusan dan tindakan yang diberikan. Maka disarankan agar auditor dapat memiliki sumber yang cukup sebelum menentukan keputusan serta diperlukannya dukungan dari manajemen atas sikap independen auditor dalam menjalankan tugas.
3. Indikator keahlian khusus pada variabel kompetensi memiliki nilai terendah di 2.67 (kategori tidak baik). Ini terjadi kemungkinan karena kepemilikan auditor terhadap kampuan atau keterampilan yang dimiliki secara pribadi atau spesifik masih berlum merata sebaranya di masing-masing tim audit. Maka disarankan agar auditor secara inisiatif memiliki keahlian khusus yang biasanya dibutuhkan dalam penugasan serta perlu dilakukannya training needs analysis oleh manajemen, sehingga pembangunan kompetensi auditor sejalan dengan kebutuhan yang diperlukan.
4. Indikator perhatian terhadap bawahan pada variabel leadership memiliki nilai terendah di 3.06 (kategori cukup). Ini terjadi kemungkinan dimana perhatian terhadap penyelesaian tugas, tingkat kesejahteraan, bagaimana pola mendiskusikan masalah dan tanggapan atas keluhan yang dirasakan auditor masih belum memadai. Maka disarankan perlunya peran dan keterlibatan nyata dari manajemen terhadap auditor dalam penyelesaian tugas, peningkatan kesejahteraan dan penjaminan karir atas sikap indenpensi yang dilakukan dalam menerima tugas.
5. Indikator idea exploration pada variabel perilaku kerja inovatif memiliki nilai terendah di 2.05 (kategori tidak baik). Ini terjadi kemungkinan dimana auditor belum maksimal dalam memberikan informasi foresight atas sebuah kesempatan atau masalah yang akan dihadapi auditan. Maka disarankan agar auditor dapat memiliki inovasi lebih atau alternatif lain dalam mencari cara mengembangkan output yang berkaitan dengan kinerjanya.
Buku Saku Perilaku Kerja Inovatif dan Efektivitas Kerja Internal AuditDr. Zar Rdj
Novelty pada penelitian ini dengan menghasilkan bukti-bukti empiris sebagai berikut:
1. Integritas, kompetensi dan leadership berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap efektivitas kerja dan peran perilaku kerja inovatif dalam memediasi integritas, kompetensi dan leadership berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap efektivitas kerja.
2. Integritas tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif dan peran perilaku kerja inovatif dalam memediasi integritas juga tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap efektivitas kerja.
3. Faktor terbesar yang berpengaruh langsung terhadap efektivitas kerja adalah perilaku kerja inovatif dengan indikator tertingginya yaitu idea generation
4. Faktor terbesar yang berpengaruh langsung terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif adalah leadership dengan indikator tertingginya yaitu perhatian terhadap tugas.
5. Faktor terbesar yang berpengaruh tidak langsung terhadap efektivitas kerja adalah leadership yang dimediasi oleh perilaku kerja inovatif dengan indikator tertingginya yaitu perhatian terhadap tugas.
Sistem manajemen kinerja pns permenpan 8 tahun 2021Dr. Zar Rdj
KINERJA INDIVIDU: Getting employees involved in the planning process will help them understand the goals of the rganization, what needs to be done, why it needs to be done, and how well it should be done
SKP ADALAH SASARAN KINERJA PEGAWAI BERBASIS HASIL
SKP disusun berjenjang berdasarkan penyelarasan dan
memiliki IKI serta target yang SMART
SKP disusun berjenjang berdasarkan penyelarasan dan
memiliki IKI serta target
Change it today birokrasi is modern modelDr. Zar Rdj
ORGANISASI PADA MASA DATANG akan menciptakan suatu kombinasi dari gejala-gejala adaptasi, pemecahan persoalan, sistem temporer, aneka ragam spesialisasi, evaluasi staf yang fleksibel, TIDAK DIDASARKAN PADA NORMA HIRARKI VERTIKAL ATAS PERBEDAAN POSISI-POSISI DAN PANGKATNYA.
Pentingnya pengendalian risiko bagi organsiasi menghadapi revolusi global dar...Dr. Zar Rdj
Semakin Cepat Kita Mendeteksi Risiko maka Semakin Cepat Kita Mengetahui Starategi Penanganannya
Semakin Cepat Kita Menyiapkan Obat maka Semakin Cepat Kita Mengambil Tindakan Perbaikan
Mewujudkan birokrasi di era disrupsi dan tatanan normal baruDr. Zar Rdj
Mewujudkan Sistem Kerja dan Manajemen SDM yang Efektif, Efisien, Transparan, dan Akuntabel Berbasis IT
TATANAN BARU BIROKRASI
Paradigm
• Dynamic
• Network
• Collaborative
Institution and Process
• Digital Organization
• Flexible Arrangement
Personnel
• Millennials
• Baby Boomers
Three lines model updated, IIA update model tiga lapis pertahanan risikoDr. Zar Rdj
UPDATE The Three Lines Model membantu organisasi mengidentifikasi struktur dan proses yang terbaik membantu mencapai tujuan dan memudahkan pemerintahan kuat dan manajemen risiko.
• Mengadopsi pendekatan berdasarkan prinsip dan menyesuaikan model untuk sesuai dengan tujuan organisasi dan keadaan.
• Fokus pada konsekuensi manajemen risiko membuat untuk mencapai tujuan dan menciptakan nilai, serta pada masalah "pertahanan" dan melindungi nilai.
• Memahami dengan jelas peran dan tanggung jawab yang diwakili dalam model dan hubungan antara mereka.
• Tindakan implementasi untuk memastikan aktivitas dan tujuan disesuaikan dengan kepentingan prioritas dari stakeholders.
Dua model pengukuran dampak ekonomi proyek infrastruktur publikDr. Zar Rdj
METODE COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRUM (CGE)
• Baik secara teoritis maupun studi empiris terdahulu membuktikan bahwa infrastruktur, khususnya infrastruktur trasportasi memiliki dampak positif pada pertumbuhan ekonomi, mengurangi kemiskinan, ketimpangan, serta meningkatkan kualitas hidup
• Namun dampak investasi infrastruktur transportasi yang berbeda perlu untuk dianilisis.
• Hasil simulai menggunakan CGE menunjukkan bahwa investasi pada jalan dan jembatan memberikan dampak pada riil PDB, konsumsi rumah tangga, serta pendapatan pajak lebih tinggi dari infrastruktur transportasi lainnya.
• Investasi pada jalan dan jembatan juga relatif memberikan dampak lebih pada peningkatan tenaga kerja serta penurunan kemiskinan.
• Untuk perdagangan, investasi jalan dan jembatan memberikan dampak pada ekspor lebih tinggi dibanding infrastruktur lainnya. Di sisi lain, investasi pada Bendungan/Rel Kereta/Bandara relatif memberikan dampak lebih tinggi daripada investasi jalan dan jembatan.
METODE RANTAI HASIL
• Digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi ultimate outcome dari proyek
• Bahan penyusunan dokumen monitoring dan evaluasi sebelum dan sesudah proyek dibangun
• Ketika telah dimanfaatkan oleh pengguna, evaluasi dampak perlu dilakukan menggunakan metode yang lebih robust misalnya:
– randomized experiment
– causal inference
– instrumental variable
– different-in-different
– regression discontinuity
– dll.
Perencanaan dan penganggaran yang lebih efisien, efektif dan bermanfaat bagi ...Dr. Zar Rdj
TUJUAN
1. Mengurangi tumpang tindih kegiatan (efektivitas dan efisiensi)
2. Meningkatkan konvergensi kegiatan pembangunan antar K/L (Lintas K/L)
3. Mengurangi cost of bureaucracy karena satu program bisa digunakan oleh beberapa UKE I
Redesain sistem perencanaan dan penganggaran kementerian dan lembagaDr. Zar Rdj
TUJUAN
1. Implementasi kebijakan money follow program;
2. Memperkuat penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja;
3. Meningkatkan konvergensi program dan kegiatan antar Kementerian/Lembaga
4. Keselarasan rumusan program dan kegiatan antara dokumen perencanaan dan dokumen penganggaran;
5. Informasi kinerja yang mudah dipahami oleh publik;
6. Mendorong K/L menerapkan value for money dalam proses perencanaan dan penganggaran serta pelaksanaannya;
7. Sinkronisasi Rumusan Program Belanja K/L dengan Belanja Daerah.
8. Menyelaraskan Visi Misi Presiden, Fokus Pembangunan (arahan Presiden), serta 7 Agenda
9. Pembangunan, Tusi K/L dan Daerah;
10. Rumusan nomenklatur Program, Kegiatan, Keluaran (Output) yang mencerminkan “real work” (konkret)
MANFAAT
1. Adanya hubungan yang jelas antara program, kegiatan, output dan outcome.
2. Meningkatkan Sinergi antar Unit Kerja Eselon I atau antar K/L dalam mencapai sasaran pembangunan.
3. Meningkatkan efisiensi belanja
4. Integrasi Sistem IT perencanaan dan penganggaran.
5. Efisieni organisasi
Maizar_Pembangunan zona integritas zi wbk wbbm tahun 2020 kementerian perhubu...Dr. Zar Rdj
https://itjen.dephub.go.id/2019/12/11/bravo-kemenhub-lompatan-besar-zona-integritas-di-tahun-2019-dalam-mengakselerasi-implementasi-reformasi-birokrasi/
DYNAMIC GOVERNANCE 2025: Pencapaian Tujuan dan Sasaran Pembangunan Semakin baik yang ditandai dengan:
1. tidak ada korupsi;
2. tidak ada pelanggaran;
3. APBN dan APBD baik;
4. semua program selesai dengan baik
5. semua perizinan selesai dengan cepat dan tepat;
6. komunikasi dengan publik baik;
7. penggunaan waktu (jam kerja) efektif dan produktif;
8. penerapan reward dan punishment secara konsisten dan berkelanjutan;
9. hasil pembangunan nyata (propertumbuhan, prolapangan kerja, dan propengurangan kemiskinan)
ZONA INTEGRITAS adalah predikat yang diberikan kepada instansi pemerintah yang pimpinan dan jajarannya mempunyai komitmen untuk mewujudkan WBK/WBBM melalui reformasi birokrasi, khususnya dalam hal pencegahan korupsi dan peningkatan kualitas pelayanan public
WILAYAH BEBAS dari KORUPSI (WBK) adalah predikat yang diberikan kepada suatu unit kerja yang memenuhi sebagian besar kriteria dalam manajemen perubahan, penataan tatalaksana, penataan sistem manajemen SDM, penguatan pengawasan, dan penguatan akuntabilitas kinerja.
WILAYAH BIROKRASI BERSIH & MELAYANI (WBBM) adalah predikat yang diberikan kepada suatu unit kerja yang memenuhi sebagian besar kriteria manajemen perubahan, penataan tatalaksana, penataan sistem manajemen SDM, penguatan pengawasan, penguatan akuntabilitas kinerja, dan penguatan kualitas pelayanan publik.
Proses audit jarak jauh selama dan setelah corona virus disease 2019 covid 19Dr. Zar Rdj
Berkembangnya COVID-19 serta adanya pembatasan perjalanan di seluruh dunia, bersamaan dengan adanya kebutuhan untuk melakukan audit sesuai dengan peraturan/ hukum atau adanya keperluan mendesak untuk melakukan audit telah memunculkan kembali pembicaraan serta perhatian terhadap upaya audit internal untuk menemukan alternatif lain sebagai pengganti proses audit tradisional - yang menggunakan metode tatap muka – untuk sesegera mungkin diimplementasikan. Proses audit jarak jauh mungkin merupakan alternatif terbaik yang dapat dilaksanakan, hal ini terutama karena sebagian besar perusahaan telah membatasi perjalanan hanya untuk fungsi-fungsi bisnis yang kritis, dan banyak negara di dunia telah melakukan penutupan sementara perbatasannya.
Pembangunan Zona Integritas (ZI) menuju predikat Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi (...Dr. Zar Rdj
Pada tahun 2025, Pencapaian Tujuan dan Sasaran Pembangunan Semakin baik yang ditandai dengan:
1. tidak ada korupsi;
2. tidak ada pelanggaran;
3. APBN dan APBD baik;
4. semua program selesai dengan baik;
5. semua perizinan selesai dengan cepat dan tepat;
6. komunikasi dengan publik baik;
7. penggunaan waktu (jam kerja) efektif dan produktif;
penerapan reward dan punishment secara konsisten dan berkelanjutan;
8. hasil pembangunan nyata (propertumbuhan, prolapangan kerja, dan propengurangan kemiskinan)
Value based internal auditing - Nilai Dasar Internal AuditDr. Zar Rdj
Nilai dasar Internal Audit
Metodologi di mana auditor internal melakukan layanan audit internal yang berwawasan ke depan untuk menawarkan pemahaman dan secara aktif mencari inovasi untuk meningkatkan organisasi, berupaya melakukan hal ini dari perspektif klien audit.
Audit berbasis nilai adalah tempat profesi audit internal menuju. Tidak banyak fungsi audit internal yang belum terlihat, tetapi merupakan tren yang muncul. Elemen kunci dari audit berbasis nilai ditunjukkan dalam diagram di dimaksd, kemudian diperluas pada komentar terkini.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
PNRR MADRID GREENTECH FOR BROWN NETWORKS NETWORKS MUR_MUSA_TEBALDI.pdf
How to build a resilient organization for sustained advantage hchp
1. Building Future Leader
HOW TO BUILD A RESILIENT
ORGANIZATION FOR SUSTAINED
ADVANTAGE
COMMITMENT
PERFORMANCEHIGH
FIVEIMPORTANTTHINGS
TO UNDERSTAND
INPERSPECTIVE Michael Beer
4. 4
TheHCHPSystem
Sources : Peter Chen on Michael Beer, 2009
Animating
Beliefs &
Aligned
Winning
Strategy
Performance
Alignment
Psychological
Alignment
Capacity for
Leaning
and Change
Change Lever 3
Strategic Performance
Management System
Change Lever 1
Leadership
Change Lever 4
Organizing System
Change Lever 5
Human Resource
System
Change Lever 2
Learning and
Governance Process
HCHP
Outcomes
6. 6
WhatHCHPLeadersWill Do
Sources : Peter Chen on Michael Beer, 2009
Purpose:
It defines the firm's contribution to customers, employees, investors,
community, and society, not only increasing stock price.
Strategy:
HCHP firms must fashion a distinctive and focused winning strategy to
stick with through good times and bad regardless of attractive
opportunities outside their field, though clearly adaptations of the strategy
will be needed
Risk:
HCHP firms avoid undue financial or cultural risk that could destroy the
firm, though they do take bold business initiatives. HCHP companies
also manage acquisitions carefully.
Motivation:
How people will be managed has to be a conscious choice.
7. 7
Simple Human Capital Management Model
Sources : Peter Chen_Slideshares
HCM Operations
Proactive
Recruiting
Strategy
(talent pool)
Recruiting
Gap
(Buy)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Placement
Evaluation
Training
Development
Talent Mgmt.
Compensation
Reward
Benefit
Change Mgmt.
HR Accounting
Human
Capital
Inventory
Individual
Capability
Gap (Build)
PMD
(Individual
Development
Plan)
CompanyPurpose/ValueProposition
CompetitiveAdvantage
PremiumHumanCapital
Engagement => Communication, Coaching, ER
Culture => Selection, Policies, Assimilation, ER
Business Strategy /
Goals / Requirements
Corp. Human Capital
Requirements
Func./Division Human
Capital Requirements
Insight - Strategic Human Capital Management