Using social media tools for academic communicationGabriela Grosseck
Presentation for "PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION AND TRANSLATION STUDIES"
International Conference, 8TH EDITION, Timisoara, Romani, 4-5 April 2013 - http://www.cls.upt.ro/cercetare/manifestari-stiintifice/conferinte/conferences
Thanks facebook.com/Micky.Io for the her beautiful profile pictures.
Presentation for "PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION AND TRANSLATION STUDIES"
International Conference, 8TH EDITION, Timisoara, Romani, 4-5 April 2013 - http://www.cls.upt.ro/cercetare/manifestari-stiintifice/conferinte/conferences
Using social media tools for academic communicationGabriela Grosseck
Presentation for "PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION AND TRANSLATION STUDIES"
International Conference, 8TH EDITION, Timisoara, Romani, 4-5 April 2013 - http://www.cls.upt.ro/cercetare/manifestari-stiintifice/conferinte/conferences
Thanks facebook.com/Micky.Io for the her beautiful profile pictures.
Presentation for "PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION AND TRANSLATION STUDIES"
International Conference, 8TH EDITION, Timisoara, Romani, 4-5 April 2013 - http://www.cls.upt.ro/cercetare/manifestari-stiintifice/conferinte/conferences
While you’re familiar with Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube, what other solutions are available to the modern admissions office and what should you consider adding to your communications arsenal? Discover new and exciting platforms for engaging prospective students, plus practical strategies and ideas to apply to the ones you’re already using.
Improving Student Achievement with New Approaches to Dataecatalst
Presentation by John Whitmer to WASC Academic Resource Conference on April 11, 2013.
The CSU Data Dashboard seeks to improve student achievement by monitoring on-track indicators so that institutional leaders can better understand not only which milestones students are failing to reach, but why they are not reaching them. It can also help campuses to design interventions or policy changes to increase student success and to gauge the impact of interventions.
Academic technologies collect highly detailed student usage data. How can this data be used to understand and predict student performance, especially of at-risk students? This presentation will discuss research on a high-enrollment undergraduate course exploring the relationship between LMS activity, student background characteristics, current enrollment information, and student achievement.
A Seminar presented at the University of South Africa on the students current and expected use of technology in relation to their learning. Presented on behalf of the Institute for Open and Distance Learning (IODL).
The A.P.L.U. (formerly NASULGC)-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning has been working for the past two years to identify the perceptions of college and university presidents and chancellors toward the potential of using online learning as a strategic asset to achieve broad institutional goals and priorities. As one part of this work, the Commission implemented a comprehensive national study of the key factors that underlie successful, strategic online programs. A second part of the study was a cross-institutional survey of faculty attitudes toward online learning. This session will summarize the results of both aspects of the study, identifying not only those elements of success cited most often by administrators, but also identifying faculty perceptions and beliefs about online learning.
Presenter: Muriel Oaks, Dean, Center for Distance and Professional Education, Washington State University and Member, A.P.L.U.-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning
CSCW 2013 - Investigating the Appropriateness of Social Network Question Aski...erinleebrady
Presentation for paper "Investigating the Appropriateness of Social Network Question Asking as a Resource for Blind Users" at CSCW 2013. We discuss a survey of blind people's social network use, their thoughts on social networking sites as a resource for question asking, and how financial incentives affected their use of social networking sites for question asking.
While you’re familiar with Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube, what other solutions are available to the modern admissions office and what should you consider adding to your communications arsenal? Discover new and exciting platforms for engaging prospective students, plus practical strategies and ideas to apply to the ones you’re already using.
Improving Student Achievement with New Approaches to Dataecatalst
Presentation by John Whitmer to WASC Academic Resource Conference on April 11, 2013.
The CSU Data Dashboard seeks to improve student achievement by monitoring on-track indicators so that institutional leaders can better understand not only which milestones students are failing to reach, but why they are not reaching them. It can also help campuses to design interventions or policy changes to increase student success and to gauge the impact of interventions.
Academic technologies collect highly detailed student usage data. How can this data be used to understand and predict student performance, especially of at-risk students? This presentation will discuss research on a high-enrollment undergraduate course exploring the relationship between LMS activity, student background characteristics, current enrollment information, and student achievement.
A Seminar presented at the University of South Africa on the students current and expected use of technology in relation to their learning. Presented on behalf of the Institute for Open and Distance Learning (IODL).
The A.P.L.U. (formerly NASULGC)-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning has been working for the past two years to identify the perceptions of college and university presidents and chancellors toward the potential of using online learning as a strategic asset to achieve broad institutional goals and priorities. As one part of this work, the Commission implemented a comprehensive national study of the key factors that underlie successful, strategic online programs. A second part of the study was a cross-institutional survey of faculty attitudes toward online learning. This session will summarize the results of both aspects of the study, identifying not only those elements of success cited most often by administrators, but also identifying faculty perceptions and beliefs about online learning.
Presenter: Muriel Oaks, Dean, Center for Distance and Professional Education, Washington State University and Member, A.P.L.U.-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning
CSCW 2013 - Investigating the Appropriateness of Social Network Question Aski...erinleebrady
Presentation for paper "Investigating the Appropriateness of Social Network Question Asking as a Resource for Blind Users" at CSCW 2013. We discuss a survey of blind people's social network use, their thoughts on social networking sites as a resource for question asking, and how financial incentives affected their use of social networking sites for question asking.
A review of the 2014 E-expectations of High School Seniors and Their Parents as presented at HighEdWeb 2014 on 10/20/14 by Stephanie Geyer (Noel-Levitz) and Lance Merker (OmniUpdate)
The Pearls and Perils of For-Profit Education (Deborah Riemer)ODLAA
Education is on a fast-paced trajectory towards change, but how do institutions do it amidst an environment steeped in tradition? For-profit institutions, in particular, are bearing the brunt of an establishment fearful of change. One of the outcries frequently heard is that for-profits sacrifice academic quality for enrollment numbers. Maintaining quality, while servicing a growing population of students, is not problematic if appropriate systems are put into place that are focused on student learning, steeped in best practices, and designed for scalability. The vision for this design is inclusive of the whole, integrating a systems approach to quality that is incorporated across all levels of the academic unit ˆ the student level, faculty level, and administrator level ˆ and incorporates learning outcomes assessment within a flexible model of program design.
Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, will share findings from a new report on e-book lending at libraries. He will also discuss other research about the rise of e-books, their impact on people’s reading habits, and the way that library patrons are hoping to avail themselves of e-book borrowing. Finally, he will explore general reading trends and describe the next steps in the Project’s ongoing research about the evolving role of libraries.
Highlights from e expectations 2012 s geyer noel-levitz
1. Highlights: The E-expectations of College-Bound
High School Juniors and Seniors
Stephanie Geyer
Associate Vice President for Web Strategy and
Interactive Marketing Services
2. E-Expectations Research
Finding answers since 2005
Visit any partner site to find the latest studies,
including the 2012 E-expectations of Juniors
and Seniors white paper and trend reports for
our recent Mobile and Communication
Preferences studies.
http://bit.ly/NkfloG
Find all of the past
studies here!
3. Methodology
Telephone survey of 2,000 high school students
• Facilitated in March and April 2012
• List source: National Research Center for
College and University Admissions
(NRCCUA)
• 95% confidence interval
• +/- 3% margin of error
4. An opportunity to compare their preferences
with our practices
Look for this logo to signal data points from
the E-Recruitment Practices study of 256 U.S.
colleges and universities facilitated by Noel-
Levitz via Web survey in April 2012
5. PEOPLE helping students formulate their
lists of schools
• Guidance Counselors (74%)
o African-American (82%) compared to Caucasian (71%)
o Web plays extremely important (77%) compared to Web
plays no role (58%)
• Friends (68%)
o Have access to a mobile device (72%) compared to those
who don’t (60%)
• Teachers (66%)
• Family (66%)
o Caucasian (69%) compared to Asian (59%) and Hispanic
(58%)
o Parent attended college (70%) compared to parent didn’t
attend (56%)
o Have mobile phone (69%) compared to those without (59%)
• Coaches (38%)
o Male (43%) compared to female (33%)
o African-American (43%) compared to Asian (31%) and
Hispanic (35%)
o Inquiries (41%) compared to applied (30%)
6. RESOURCES students use to form the list
of schools they’ll consider
Web search just trailing print
• Brochures/print mail from schools (72%)
• Will give an e-mail address (74%) compared
to those who wouldn’t (57%)
• Google, Bing, or Yahoo search (67%)
• Asian (77%), African-American (74%) and
Hispanic (72%) compared to Caucasian
(63%)
• E-mails I get from schools (62%)
• The College Board (51%)
• MyCollegeOptions (40%)
Using SEO strategies? • CollegeWeekLive (30%)
• Cappex (12%)
• Zinch (8%)
42% of 4-yr privates • Peterson’s (5%)
34% of 4-yr publics
21% of 2-yr schools
7. What resources are most influential?
5
4.54 4.59
4.5 4.16 4.12 4.09 4 4.04
3.84
4 3.85
3.7 3.75
3.53 3.59
3.5 3.38
3
2.47
2.5 2.29
Seniors
2
Juniors
1.5
1
0.5
0
Tour Web site Talk with a Talk with College Guidance Brochures College's
student admissions search counselor Facebook
rep sites page
8. 55% couldn’t find what they
wanted because of challenges
with the site navigation
• Juniors were much more likely to have
challenges finding academic and cost
content than seniors
What challenges did they experience on
the last college site they visited?
9. Content Priorities
First target Most important Mobile
Academics 55% 47% 23%
Money 23% 29% 17%
Process 11% 11% 11%
Visit 5% 3% 3%
Campus 3% 5% 3%
Athletics 3% 3% 3%
10. Most effective way to learn about a school’s
ACADEMIC PROGRAM OPTIONS
Descriptions on a Web site 71%
68%
Printed brochures 68%
74%
Presentations from… 61%
58%
E-mail from program faculty 55%
56%
Web search 50% Seniors
53%
Juniors
Independent online sites 48%
50%
Videos of faculty/current students 43%
43%
Social media 38%
38%
Blog posts 31%
30%
Live chats/webcasts 24%
29%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
11. Alpha-ordered list is the top method for
sharing academic program options
• 41% Browse through an
alphabetically-ordered list
• 33% Use a search box
• 26% Look through a college or
departmental page for all of the
programs within that area
12. Most effective Way to Learn About COST, AID, AND
SCHOLARSHIPS
Details on a Web site 49%
49%
Printed brochures 29%
34%
E-mail from financial aid staff 28%
28%
Presentations from financial aid 21%
staff 21%
Videos explaining how to apply for 16%
aid/scholarships 19%
Independent online sites 16%
20%
Calculators 15%
16%
Search 15%
18%
Live Chats/Webcasts 10%
12% Seniors
Social media pages 9% Juniors
11%
Blog posts 8%
9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
13. Calculator Use Decreased
23% of all students have used one, down
from 36% in 2011
• 31% of seniors had done so, compared
to 15% of juniors
Why haven’t they used a calculator yet?
• 74% haven’t found one, up from 50% in
2011
o No significant difference between juniors
or seniors
Got net price calculator?
90% of 4-yr privates
77% of 4-yr publics
59% of 2-yr schools
14. Most effective way to learn about a school’s
CAMPUS LOCATION AND COMMUNITY
68%
Web site details 69%
Campus visits 72%
69%
Printed brochures 58%
62%
E-mail messages 50%
52%
Search 46%
44%
Videos 47%
44%
Independent sites 41%
42%
Seniors
Social media 34%
36% Juniors
Blog posts 30%
30%
Live chats/webcasts 25%
29%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
15. Can they find your inquiry
form easily?
When they find the content they need on your site, they’re going to look
for a way to connect and engage!
1. Inquiry form
2. Visit options
3. Faculty e-mail links
4. Admissions e-mail links
5. Catalog detail
Inquiry form online?
88% of 4-yr privates
77% of 4-yr publics
62% of 2-yr schools
16. More than two-thirds (67%)
have regular access to a
mobile device
• 20% are using tablets
• 52% of college-bound
students have looked at a
college Web site using a
mobile device
Site optimized for mobile?
35% of 4-yr privates
39% of 4-yr publics
7% of 2-yr schools
18. Webcam use higher among some students of color
75% of students would talk to an
admission rep or current student via
webcam
• 81% of juniors
• 69% of seniors
Underrepresented students are
more likely to use webcams for
personal use
• 45% overall
• Asian (62%)
• African-American (52%)
• Hispanic (46%)
• Caucasian (39%)
19. Students say they would participate in live chat sessions…
69% of all students would Student: I’ve heard your engineering program is
participate in a live chat one of the best. Can you explain why?
Faculty Member: There are a few important
event with faculty about a factors to consider…
specific program
72% would do so to learn
more about cost, aid, and
scholarships
20. If only we would ASK them to
participate in live chat
While 75% of Online Channels 4-year 4-year 2-year
Offered private public school
students would
Live chats 34% 39% 7%
chat with college
reps via webcam... Instant messaging 16% 21% 10%
Web camera 11% 10% 0%
only 4% have
Webcast events 10% 16% 7%
actually had these
online Skype 35% 19% 7%
conversations FaceTime 4% 5% 3%
22. Facebook use remains steady at 79%
Visited a school page?
• 46% have—up from 27% in 2011
• 98% of 4-year privates have
69% have “liked” a school’s page a Facebook page
o 70% have a separate
What do they expect in return? Not much!
admissions page
• 36% info about admissions deadlines and events • 97% of 4-year publics have a
• 34% info about academic programs Facebook page
• 30% updates through the news feed o 74% have a separate
• 30% the name of the school to appear in their “likes” admissions page
• 26% special info they can’t get elsewhere • 93% of 2-year schools have
• 26% interaction with page admins
• 26% contact from school about admission a Facebook page
• 25% photos and videos o 21% have a separate
• 21% interaction with other people who like the page admissions page
• 20% posts to share
• 18% specific info tailored to user profile
23. Twitter use increased to 27% up from 9%
25% follow a school feed—up from 19%
How often do you look at Twitter/update? Using Twitter?
60%
4-yr private: 37%
4-yr public: 44%
50% 2-yr school: 14%
40%
30%
Student Use
20% 4-yr Private
4-yr Public
2-year
10%
0%
Many 1x/day Every other 2x/week 1x/week 2x/month Never Other
times/day day
24. 19% use Google+; 10% include schools
How often do you look at/update Google+?
Using Google+?
80%
4-yr private: 7%
70% 4-yr public: 10%
2-yr school: 0%
60%
50%
40%
Student Use
30%
4-yr Private
20%
4-yr Public
10%
0%
Many 1x/day Every other 2x/week 1x/week 2x/month 1x/month Never Other
times/day day
25. E-mail use remains steady
78% of juniors; 85% of seniors say they still use e-mail at
least once per week
93% will give an e-mail address to schools
• Just 5% will give a family or parent account
When?
• When they ask for it 55%
• Juniors 63%
• Seniors 48%
• Application 40%
• Juniors 33%
• Seniors 45%
• Post-acceptance 4%
• Never 1%
27. It might be time to start your texting
program, if you haven’t already
60% say it’s OK to send them texts
Especially…
• African-American and Hispanic
• Lower income
• Students from the South
• Mobile users
Why not?
• Don’t bother me! 58%
• Texting is for family/friends 27%
• No data plan 6%
• I’m not ready 3%
• Too expensive 3%
• Phone doesn’t text 3%
28. Do you collect cell numbers? How do you use them?
4-year 4-year 2-year
private public school
Collect cell numbers? 92% 74% 97%
Relationship-building calls 86% 61% 36%
Notifications 40% 24% 57%
Telecounseling call centers 38% 48% 21%
Individual text messages 35% 22% 21%
Mass text messages 16% 9% 18%
Other 4% 15% 11%
30. Integrated Strategies Will Leverage
Resources and Improve Service
Test your Web site information architecture
with key markets. Do they get it?
Invest in search engine optimization strategies
Work on a content strategy—integrate site and social
media assets.
Ready for even more mobile users?
Build an editorial calendar to support your social
media engagements; integrate with e-mail flow
Experiment with a variety of
Webcast/Web cam and live chat
engagement options
31. E-mail: Still NOT
Dead
• Keep it in your overall
communications flow mix.
• Integrate messages with your
social media editorial
calendars.
• Be sure that key message
themes from inquiry stage are
repeated in your yield flows.
• Are you testing your
messages?
• Do you have content-matched
landing pages to support
engagement and conversion?
• Are you measuring carefully
and remembering to check in
on the results on a regular
basis?
32. Use the communication
channels students prefer
• The conversations students have with
campus representatives are impactful
• Students use live chat, webcams, and
text messaging frequently… and are
open to speaking with camps reps
through these channels
• Get a strategy in place to line up with
the rest of your communications flow.
• Use texting for key upcoming
deadlines and use live chat or
webcasts to make personal
connections
• Set up a measurement strategy and
pay attention to the results
33. Join our mailing
list to receive
more about E-
expectations
and other
research
NoelLevitz.com
Editor's Notes
Key research findings from E-expectations study referenced in this presentation are from a telephone survey of 2000 high school juniors and seniors facilitated in March and April of 2012. List source: National Research Center for College and University Admissions (NRCCUA); 95% confidence interval; +/- 3% margin of error49% Juniors51% Seniors54% Female46% Male38% A average50% B average11% C average1% <C average1% American Indian5% Asian14% African-American15% Hispanic41% Caucasian15% Other9% No response25% Midwest16% Northeast38% South21% West
Live Conversations Study—Fall 2011: Subjects accessed an online survey via email message sent through CollegeWeekLive. Participants were incented with an offer to be entered into a drawing for an iPad upon completion of the survey.1,307 high school juniors, seniors and parents58% seniors14% juniors28% not reported/parentsGender:40% female17% male43% not reportedEthnicity:31% white/Caucasian10% Asian/Pacific Islander6% African-American4% Hispanic/Latino4% Mexican/Mexican-American44% Not reportedWhy are juniors more open than seniors? Earlier in their process, still list-building, haven’t seen as much
18% were put off by the look and feel of the site or the content quality12% couldn’t find academic content 8% couldn’t find cost, fin aid or scholarship details
No significant differences by class year.
Note: Calculator refers only to instance for first-time in college students. See the E-Recruitment practices report for further details.
SG
LM
62 percent of Asian American students and 52 percent of African American students used Webcams compares to 46 percent of Hispanic students and 39 percent of Caucasian students.Students from the Northeast and upper-income students were also more likely to use Webcams than students from other regions or economic brackets.81 percent of juniors said they would be willing to speak with campus representatives via Webcam, compares to 69 percent of seniors.
Compared to the 2011 E-Expectations results, Facebook use remained consistent. However, YouTube use rose from 55 percent to 62 percent, while Twitter jumped from 9 percent to 27 percent. Forty-four percent of African American students said they used Twitter, considerably more than other ethnic groups, while 35 percent of upper-income students said they used Twitter at least once per week.
2011 study showed 80% of students as Facebook users54% Asian53% African-American46% Caucasian
Follow a school: 33% from the south was significantly higher than 22% from the Midwest, 14% from the northeast and 13% from the west.
Follow a school: 33% from the south was significantly higher than 22% from the Midwest, 14% from the northeast and 13% from the west.
In 2011 86% of high school seniors said they used e-mail regularly and would give address to schools at the same rate—93%.Timing for sharing e-mail addresses was very similar in 2011 study.
Differences among various groups regarding institutions unknown to students:76 percent of juniors said they would open those e-mails, versus 63 percent for seniorsB-average students were significantly more likely to do so (73 percent) than A-average students (62 percent)Nearly three-quarters of African American students (74 percent) said yes, compared to 63 percent of Caucasian studentsThose at the inquiry stage were significantly more likely (73 percent) than those with at least one acceptance (63 percent)