How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and high employment? Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save us?
Post-COVID Economic Challenges: Unemployment, Increasing Inflation & National...Paul H. Carr
Post-COVID Economic Challenges: Unemployment, Income inequality, Increasing Inflation, & National Debt.
Paul H Carr summarized a webinar by the following: Eric Rosengren, President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; Wendy Edelberg, Brookings Institution, and Philip Swagel, Director, Congressional Budget Office. Would less inflationary and debt increasing relief act have been better than President Biden’s $1.9 Trillion bill?
Government spending has been steadily increasing over the past 40 years, even when adjusted for inflation and population growth. This rising government spending has caused economic growth and standards of living to slow down, with each successive decade seeing smaller gains. If current trends continue, future government spending will dramatically outpace GDP growth and cause the national debt to reach unsustainable levels, potentially limiting prosperity for future generations. Cutting government spending is necessary to increase economic growth and standards of living going forward.
We debunk several common myths about the national debt. Like deficits are falling; there is no harm in waiting; deficit reduction will harm the most vulnerable; and the debt can be fixed by cutting waste, fraud or foreign aid.
COVID's Impact on Inflation and Income EqualityPaul H. Carr
Will inflation from the COVID recovery be permanent?
What does the Federal Reserve Predict?
Has the COVID recovery increased income equality?
Why do job openings now outnumber job seekers?
The document discusses the growing problem of government debt in the United States. It notes that the annual deficit has grown substantially in recent years, reaching over $1 trillion in 2010 and 2011. This level of deficit requires significant government borrowing each year. The total national debt held by the public is over $10 trillion. Cutting spending, raising taxes, and economic growth are the three main strategies proposed to address the debt, but each faces challenges. The high and growing level of debt poses economic risks going forward.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
What happens if the us credit rating is downgraded 7.22.2021 - Kurt S. Altric...Kurt S. Altrichter
1) The US government debt level of nearly $30 trillion poses risks even though low interest rates have kept debt servicing costs low currently. The upcoming expiration of the debt ceiling raises the possibility of a downgrade in the US credit rating or a technical default.
2) A credit downgrade or hitting the debt ceiling without a resolution could negatively impact risk assets, as occurred in 2011. Investors should take a longer term view and pay attention to weakening economic fundamentals rather than just focusing on record high stock markets.
3) The options available to address the growing debt problem like raising taxes or interest rates all carry risks for either the economy, financial markets or the US dollar. The government appears backed into a corner with
Post-COVID Economic Challenges: Unemployment, Increasing Inflation & National...Paul H. Carr
Post-COVID Economic Challenges: Unemployment, Income inequality, Increasing Inflation, & National Debt.
Paul H Carr summarized a webinar by the following: Eric Rosengren, President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; Wendy Edelberg, Brookings Institution, and Philip Swagel, Director, Congressional Budget Office. Would less inflationary and debt increasing relief act have been better than President Biden’s $1.9 Trillion bill?
Government spending has been steadily increasing over the past 40 years, even when adjusted for inflation and population growth. This rising government spending has caused economic growth and standards of living to slow down, with each successive decade seeing smaller gains. If current trends continue, future government spending will dramatically outpace GDP growth and cause the national debt to reach unsustainable levels, potentially limiting prosperity for future generations. Cutting government spending is necessary to increase economic growth and standards of living going forward.
We debunk several common myths about the national debt. Like deficits are falling; there is no harm in waiting; deficit reduction will harm the most vulnerable; and the debt can be fixed by cutting waste, fraud or foreign aid.
COVID's Impact on Inflation and Income EqualityPaul H. Carr
Will inflation from the COVID recovery be permanent?
What does the Federal Reserve Predict?
Has the COVID recovery increased income equality?
Why do job openings now outnumber job seekers?
The document discusses the growing problem of government debt in the United States. It notes that the annual deficit has grown substantially in recent years, reaching over $1 trillion in 2010 and 2011. This level of deficit requires significant government borrowing each year. The total national debt held by the public is over $10 trillion. Cutting spending, raising taxes, and economic growth are the three main strategies proposed to address the debt, but each faces challenges. The high and growing level of debt poses economic risks going forward.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
This document provides information about the national debt of the United States from an organization called "Fix the Debt". It discusses that the current national debt is over $13 trillion and is projected to continue rising without action. It outlines some of the main causes of the debt as well as the effects, including higher costs of living and reduced ability to respond to future crises. It argues that reforms are needed to entitlement programs, taxes, and spending to put the debt on a sustainable long-term path.
What happens if the us credit rating is downgraded 7.22.2021 - Kurt S. Altric...Kurt S. Altrichter
1) The US government debt level of nearly $30 trillion poses risks even though low interest rates have kept debt servicing costs low currently. The upcoming expiration of the debt ceiling raises the possibility of a downgrade in the US credit rating or a technical default.
2) A credit downgrade or hitting the debt ceiling without a resolution could negatively impact risk assets, as occurred in 2011. Investors should take a longer term view and pay attention to weakening economic fundamentals rather than just focusing on record high stock markets.
3) The options available to address the growing debt problem like raising taxes or interest rates all carry risks for either the economy, financial markets or the US dollar. The government appears backed into a corner with
FRB-Richmond_ unsustainable fiscal policy_ implications for monetary policyFred Kautz
Economic research suggests that high debt levels ultimately could overwhelm a central bank’s efforts to keep prices stable. This essay will argue that these outcomes should be avoided in the United States by putting fiscal policy on a sustainable path.
The document summarizes common myths about the national debt and provides facts to address each myth in 1-3 concise sentences. It discusses that while deficits are smaller than during the recession, the debt will still grow substantially without action. It also notes that the longer action is delayed, the greater cuts or tax increases will need to be. Additionally, gradual deficit reduction can help the economy rather than hurt it, and past plans have protected vulnerable groups. The debt issues also cannot be solved solely by cutting waste, taxing wealthier Americans more, or relying on economic growth alone.
- Missouri is facing major budget issues as state revenues have declined significantly due to the economic downturn. Federal stabilization funds have helped but will run out, leaving a large shortfall.
- State revenues are down 10% in the first quarter of FY2010 and are projected to decline further. Unemployment will remain high.
- Governor Nixon has already implemented $200M in budget cuts for FY2010 but further cuts will likely be needed. The stabilization funds have masked the true budget problems.
- When the federal funds expire after FY2011, Missouri faces a major fiscal crisis without new revenue sources or job growth to boost the economy.
The newsletter discusses the growing economic divide in the US, with facts showing that the rich are getting richer while the middle class and poor are worse off. It argues the recovery reported in the news does not reflect most Americans' experiences. When the Federal Reserve stops stimulating the economy by buying bonds, interest rates will rise, which could trigger a recession worse than 2008 by hurting consumers and the housing/stock markets. The massive US debt also makes the economy vulnerable if interest rates return to historical levels.
The document provides a summary of 16 common budget myths that may come up during the 2016 US presidential campaign. It aims to fact check these myths by presenting data and analysis from nonpartisan groups like the Congressional Budget Office and Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The myths are grouped into categories on issues like the national debt, taxes, healthcare/Social Security, and proposed "easy fixes". For each myth, the summary counters arguments with evidence about risks of high debt and limitations of proposals to solve budget problems through tax cuts, targeting only the wealthy, or closing only narrow loopholes.
The next President will need to confront a number of budgetary challenges and will likely sign into law many federal tax and spending changes. Yet too often, election campaigns are about telling voters what they want to hear rather than what they need to know. To separate fiction from reality, the new Fiscal FactChecker series will monitor the 2016 Presidential campaign on an ongoing basis. To start with, we have identified 16 myths that may come up during the campaign.
The document discusses the differences between the national debt and the federal deficit of the United States. The federal deficit refers to the amount of money the government spends beyond what it collects in revenue each year. The national debt is the total accumulation of all past deficits minus any surpluses. Interest payments on the national debt contribute to the annual deficit. While deficits are not always negative, sustained large deficits pose risks if the money is not spent on investments that improve economic growth over the long term.
The document discusses the economic consequences of government stimulus and growing debt levels. It argues that Obama's stimulus plans increased dependence on government and debt without creating many jobs. Growing debt obligations from programs like Social Security and Medicare will cause total US debt to increase dramatically in coming decades to over 300% of GDP by 2050. Repaying this debt will require tax increases that will significantly reduce the quality of life for Americans.
This document summarizes the tax code changes and spending cuts that would go into effect on January 1, 2013 if Congress fails to act, known as the "fiscal cliff." Most individual income tax rates would increase substantially. Capital gains and dividend tax rates would also rise significantly. Spending cuts of 9.4% for defense and 8.2% for non-defense programs would take effect. The Congressional Budget Office predicts this would cause the economy to enter a recession with unemployment rising to over 9%. There is debate around a more balanced approach that raises revenues through tax reform in addition to spending cuts.
After the US dollar replaced gold, the US debt became the attention worldwide, thus the demand for the US dollar continued, furthermore the extremely low interest of the dollar. This helped the US government to borrow great amounts of debt as well as kept the creditors pleased. Due to the pandemic, the US economy retrograded because of the tax cut and unproductive rescue spending plan plus surpassing spending of the government. The rising inflation starts to increase to high levels, which certainly the government must cut back spending or its patterns, while this will lead to uncertain consequences for the long future. This paper discusses several different perspectives on the US government's sustainability as its ability to settle the debt in future, the fate of growth burdened with that debt through the neoclassical mode of growth, and also the effect of anxiety of defaults and unfunded obligations. Inversely, it explores the strength of the dollar with a low-interest rate and its sustainability worldwide. We also propose ways helping of strengthen the fiscal government position and solutions to help the economy recover in long term and to easiest the situation. In the synopsis, we propose something that could affect and shake the global market.
The document discusses the trade deficit and fiscal deficit issues facing the US economy. It provides an overview of key economic indicators like GDP, inflation, and monetary and fiscal policies. It then analyzes the US trade deficit in more depth, noting that imports exceeded exports in 2010, leaving a $43 billion deficit. Major trade partners with deficits are China, Canada, and Mexico. The document also examines the country's large fiscal deficit, which was $1.56 trillion in 2010 and has historically increased government debt levels over time. A variety of approaches to balancing the deficit are mentioned, including increasing tax revenues, reducing spending, and issuing more government bonds.
Federal budget slide show civic club versionAlex Cardenas
This document discusses myths and realities about the US federal budget and deficits. It contends that tax policies rather than spending have mainly driven deficits since 1981. While spending cuts could help, the largest expenditure - wars and the military - is often treated as untouchable. It also argues that solving budget problems requires addressing growing inequality in wealth and political power between the richest 10% and everyone else. Specific myths debunked include claims that Social Security and Medicare contribute to deficits, and that tax cuts for the wealthy encourage job creation. Charts show how spending has changed under Democratic and Republican presidents.
This document provides an executive summary and analysis of the anticipated performance of the U.S. construction industry in 2015. It finds that while the construction industry rebounded in 2014, growth outpaced GDP and private sector growth continues, public sector construction is also showing signs of improvement. The U.S. economy is growing steadily but corporate profits are high while wages are still low. Inflation remains below targets due to falling energy prices, and the Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates in 2015 to address inflation, which will impact some industries. Overall, 2015 is forecast to be a strong growth year for construction.
2015 State of the Construction Industry Lisa Dehner
This document provides an executive summary and analysis of the anticipated performance of the U.S. construction industry in 2015. It finds that while the construction industry rebounded in 2014, growth outpaced GDP and private sector growth continues, public sector construction is also showing signs of improvement. The U.S. economy is growing steadily but corporate profits are high while wages are still low. Inflation remains below targets due to falling energy prices, and the Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates in 2015 to address inflation, which will impact some industries. Overall, 2015 is forecast to be a strong growth year for construction.
The document discusses key questions around the UK's public finances in light of the 2021 budget. It notes that while the economic outlook has improved, the pandemic will likely leave lasting scars and elevated public borrowing. The Chancellor has extended many COVID support measures but only announced limited tax rises. There is debate around whether now is the right time to tackle high debt levels, as growth is the priority, but consideration of fiscal sustainability is also important. Any future deficit reduction would likely rely more on tax rises than spending cuts due to public sentiment against austerity.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
The document discusses the national debt of the United States, which currently stands at over $18 trillion. It explores the history of rising US debt levels and the economic effects of increasing versus consolidating the debt. Increasing debt leads to higher interest rates, less investment, and reduced GDP growth. Consolidating debt has short-term negative effects but long-term benefits like lower interest rates and more funding for programs. The document also examines threats of sovereign default and financial crises based on examples from other countries.
Climate Change Extremes: Hurricane Extremes.pptxPaul H Carr
1. CLIMATE CHANGE EXTREMES: MORE INTENSE HURRICANES & FOREST FIRES
2. CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCE:
Global warming amplifies hurricane impacts.
CO2 from fossil fuel burning is warming our Earth via the Greenhouse effect
3. WHAT WE CAN DO IMMEDIATELY:
A more vegetarian diet.
What is eternal life after death?
-Mathematical relations and physical laws are eternal.
-Biblical understandings of eternity.
Tillich: Eternity is a dimension above time enabling us to perceive events happening in temporal sequence.
“Our lives are limited in time but fulfilled by our participation in everlasting eternity.”
When we die, our family, friends, colleagues, & citizens remember us.
Whitehead: We are remembered in the Mind of God by our participation in the eternal, consequent divine life.
More Related Content
Similar to HIGH INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
FRB-Richmond_ unsustainable fiscal policy_ implications for monetary policyFred Kautz
Economic research suggests that high debt levels ultimately could overwhelm a central bank’s efforts to keep prices stable. This essay will argue that these outcomes should be avoided in the United States by putting fiscal policy on a sustainable path.
The document summarizes common myths about the national debt and provides facts to address each myth in 1-3 concise sentences. It discusses that while deficits are smaller than during the recession, the debt will still grow substantially without action. It also notes that the longer action is delayed, the greater cuts or tax increases will need to be. Additionally, gradual deficit reduction can help the economy rather than hurt it, and past plans have protected vulnerable groups. The debt issues also cannot be solved solely by cutting waste, taxing wealthier Americans more, or relying on economic growth alone.
- Missouri is facing major budget issues as state revenues have declined significantly due to the economic downturn. Federal stabilization funds have helped but will run out, leaving a large shortfall.
- State revenues are down 10% in the first quarter of FY2010 and are projected to decline further. Unemployment will remain high.
- Governor Nixon has already implemented $200M in budget cuts for FY2010 but further cuts will likely be needed. The stabilization funds have masked the true budget problems.
- When the federal funds expire after FY2011, Missouri faces a major fiscal crisis without new revenue sources or job growth to boost the economy.
The newsletter discusses the growing economic divide in the US, with facts showing that the rich are getting richer while the middle class and poor are worse off. It argues the recovery reported in the news does not reflect most Americans' experiences. When the Federal Reserve stops stimulating the economy by buying bonds, interest rates will rise, which could trigger a recession worse than 2008 by hurting consumers and the housing/stock markets. The massive US debt also makes the economy vulnerable if interest rates return to historical levels.
The document provides a summary of 16 common budget myths that may come up during the 2016 US presidential campaign. It aims to fact check these myths by presenting data and analysis from nonpartisan groups like the Congressional Budget Office and Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The myths are grouped into categories on issues like the national debt, taxes, healthcare/Social Security, and proposed "easy fixes". For each myth, the summary counters arguments with evidence about risks of high debt and limitations of proposals to solve budget problems through tax cuts, targeting only the wealthy, or closing only narrow loopholes.
The next President will need to confront a number of budgetary challenges and will likely sign into law many federal tax and spending changes. Yet too often, election campaigns are about telling voters what they want to hear rather than what they need to know. To separate fiction from reality, the new Fiscal FactChecker series will monitor the 2016 Presidential campaign on an ongoing basis. To start with, we have identified 16 myths that may come up during the campaign.
The document discusses the differences between the national debt and the federal deficit of the United States. The federal deficit refers to the amount of money the government spends beyond what it collects in revenue each year. The national debt is the total accumulation of all past deficits minus any surpluses. Interest payments on the national debt contribute to the annual deficit. While deficits are not always negative, sustained large deficits pose risks if the money is not spent on investments that improve economic growth over the long term.
The document discusses the economic consequences of government stimulus and growing debt levels. It argues that Obama's stimulus plans increased dependence on government and debt without creating many jobs. Growing debt obligations from programs like Social Security and Medicare will cause total US debt to increase dramatically in coming decades to over 300% of GDP by 2050. Repaying this debt will require tax increases that will significantly reduce the quality of life for Americans.
This document summarizes the tax code changes and spending cuts that would go into effect on January 1, 2013 if Congress fails to act, known as the "fiscal cliff." Most individual income tax rates would increase substantially. Capital gains and dividend tax rates would also rise significantly. Spending cuts of 9.4% for defense and 8.2% for non-defense programs would take effect. The Congressional Budget Office predicts this would cause the economy to enter a recession with unemployment rising to over 9%. There is debate around a more balanced approach that raises revenues through tax reform in addition to spending cuts.
After the US dollar replaced gold, the US debt became the attention worldwide, thus the demand for the US dollar continued, furthermore the extremely low interest of the dollar. This helped the US government to borrow great amounts of debt as well as kept the creditors pleased. Due to the pandemic, the US economy retrograded because of the tax cut and unproductive rescue spending plan plus surpassing spending of the government. The rising inflation starts to increase to high levels, which certainly the government must cut back spending or its patterns, while this will lead to uncertain consequences for the long future. This paper discusses several different perspectives on the US government's sustainability as its ability to settle the debt in future, the fate of growth burdened with that debt through the neoclassical mode of growth, and also the effect of anxiety of defaults and unfunded obligations. Inversely, it explores the strength of the dollar with a low-interest rate and its sustainability worldwide. We also propose ways helping of strengthen the fiscal government position and solutions to help the economy recover in long term and to easiest the situation. In the synopsis, we propose something that could affect and shake the global market.
The document discusses the trade deficit and fiscal deficit issues facing the US economy. It provides an overview of key economic indicators like GDP, inflation, and monetary and fiscal policies. It then analyzes the US trade deficit in more depth, noting that imports exceeded exports in 2010, leaving a $43 billion deficit. Major trade partners with deficits are China, Canada, and Mexico. The document also examines the country's large fiscal deficit, which was $1.56 trillion in 2010 and has historically increased government debt levels over time. A variety of approaches to balancing the deficit are mentioned, including increasing tax revenues, reducing spending, and issuing more government bonds.
Federal budget slide show civic club versionAlex Cardenas
This document discusses myths and realities about the US federal budget and deficits. It contends that tax policies rather than spending have mainly driven deficits since 1981. While spending cuts could help, the largest expenditure - wars and the military - is often treated as untouchable. It also argues that solving budget problems requires addressing growing inequality in wealth and political power between the richest 10% and everyone else. Specific myths debunked include claims that Social Security and Medicare contribute to deficits, and that tax cuts for the wealthy encourage job creation. Charts show how spending has changed under Democratic and Republican presidents.
This document provides an executive summary and analysis of the anticipated performance of the U.S. construction industry in 2015. It finds that while the construction industry rebounded in 2014, growth outpaced GDP and private sector growth continues, public sector construction is also showing signs of improvement. The U.S. economy is growing steadily but corporate profits are high while wages are still low. Inflation remains below targets due to falling energy prices, and the Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates in 2015 to address inflation, which will impact some industries. Overall, 2015 is forecast to be a strong growth year for construction.
2015 State of the Construction Industry Lisa Dehner
This document provides an executive summary and analysis of the anticipated performance of the U.S. construction industry in 2015. It finds that while the construction industry rebounded in 2014, growth outpaced GDP and private sector growth continues, public sector construction is also showing signs of improvement. The U.S. economy is growing steadily but corporate profits are high while wages are still low. Inflation remains below targets due to falling energy prices, and the Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates in 2015 to address inflation, which will impact some industries. Overall, 2015 is forecast to be a strong growth year for construction.
The document discusses key questions around the UK's public finances in light of the 2021 budget. It notes that while the economic outlook has improved, the pandemic will likely leave lasting scars and elevated public borrowing. The Chancellor has extended many COVID support measures but only announced limited tax rises. There is debate around whether now is the right time to tackle high debt levels, as growth is the priority, but consideration of fiscal sustainability is also important. Any future deficit reduction would likely rely more on tax rises than spending cuts due to public sentiment against austerity.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
Rarely has there been more uncertainty regarding the course of the public finances over the next five years. In this note we aim to answer some of the big questions for the economy in light of the 2021 budget.
The document discusses the national debt of the United States, which currently stands at over $18 trillion. It explores the history of rising US debt levels and the economic effects of increasing versus consolidating the debt. Increasing debt leads to higher interest rates, less investment, and reduced GDP growth. Consolidating debt has short-term negative effects but long-term benefits like lower interest rates and more funding for programs. The document also examines threats of sovereign default and financial crises based on examples from other countries.
Similar to HIGH INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION? (20)
Climate Change Extremes: Hurricane Extremes.pptxPaul H Carr
1. CLIMATE CHANGE EXTREMES: MORE INTENSE HURRICANES & FOREST FIRES
2. CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCE:
Global warming amplifies hurricane impacts.
CO2 from fossil fuel burning is warming our Earth via the Greenhouse effect
3. WHAT WE CAN DO IMMEDIATELY:
A more vegetarian diet.
What is eternal life after death?
-Mathematical relations and physical laws are eternal.
-Biblical understandings of eternity.
Tillich: Eternity is a dimension above time enabling us to perceive events happening in temporal sequence.
“Our lives are limited in time but fulfilled by our participation in everlasting eternity.”
When we die, our family, friends, colleagues, & citizens remember us.
Whitehead: We are remembered in the Mind of God by our participation in the eternal, consequent divine life.
“Nothing” at the Cosmic Beginning?
Is the creation of something from “nothing” (creatio ex nihilo) biblical?
Priest George Lemaitre, using Einstein’s general relativity, predicted the “beginning” was a miniscule, hot big bang. Radio astronomers have measured the cool fossil radiation from this hot “beginning.”
MIT Prof. Guth’s inflationary cosmology refined with Lemaitre’s prediction. Guth’s answer to “what was there at the beginning” is “the laws of physics.” “In the beginning was the word, or logos (John 1.1).”
Our founding fathers knew that truth is essential for our democracy to flourish.
George Washington believed, ““Truth will ultimately prevail where pains are taken to bring it to light.”
Benjamin Franklin warned, “We have given you a republic, if you can keep it.”
Fake news and Big Lies are examples of the truth decay that is threatening the integrity of our elections. Yet, a MIT study determined that Twitter falsehoods spread 6 times faster than truth.
When we are so outraged at a falsehood that we share it with friends, we are unintentionally spreading the lie.
Let’s stop truth decay by communicating it by word and deed, for truth is essential for keeping us free.
Our founding fathers knew that truth is essential for our democracy to flourish.
George Washington believed, ““Truth will ultimately prevail where pains are taken to bring it to light.”
Benjamin Franklin warned, “We have given you a republic, if you can keep it.”
Fake news and Big Lies are examples of the truth decay that is threatening the integrity of our elections. Yet, a MIT study determined that Twitter falsehoods spread 6 times faster than truth.
When we are so outraged at a falsehood that we share it with friends, we are unintentionally spreading the lie.
Let’s stop truth decay by communicating it by word and deed, for truth is essential for keeping us free.
Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions Against Russia?Paul H Carr
1. Europe is still heavily reliant on importing natural gas from Russia, funding Russia's war in Ukraine. Options to reduce this reliance include small modular nuclear reactors and increased green hydrogen production.
2. Carbon emissions and income inequality are generally better in Europe compared to the US, due to higher taxes funding social programs in Europe.
3. Germany in particular needs to address its high carbon emissions given its phase-out of nuclear power, leading to increased reliance on dirty coal and Russian natural gas. Expanding nuclear and green energy can help solve this problem.
Theologies Overcoming Naturalism's LimitationsPaul H Carr
Scientific Naturalism has no eternal life and purpose. Tillich’s existential and Whitehead’s process theologies overcome the limitations of scientific “naturalism without religion.” Tillich, Wildman, Whitehead, and Bracken’s theologies updates the Bible’s promise of eternal life as well as the meaning and goal of history. Paul Tillich’s metaphor of religion as the Dimension of Depth is similar to Ursula Goodenough’s Sacred Depths of Nature. Tillich interpreted history as a quest towards the goal (end) of establishing the Kingdom of God “on earth as it is it heaven” (Lord’s Prayer). For Whitehead, the goal of the Universe is the production of beauty. “The thirst for beauty that permeates our lives is an opening to transcendence,” according to theologian Philip Hefner.
Net-Zero CO2 with Nuclear, Hydrogen, & Geothermal Paul H Carr
NET-ZERO CO2 with NUCLEAR, H2, & GEOTHERMAL.
Will these save us by 2050?
The electrolysis of H2O generates Green Hydrogen, H2.
Since 1989, Cold Fusion, the electrolysis of heavy water, fizzled. New fission reactors and Hot Nuclear Fusion could generate green electricity 24/7.
Deep geothermal is poised for a breakout similar to the horizontal drilling that made natural gas cheaper than coal.
Rivier University Institute for Senior Education (RISE) Course
A series of 6 PowerPoint Talks
How did we maintain meaning, purpose, and even happiness during the COVID19 lockdown?
It lowered the CO2 emissions that are warming our planet, but increased income inequality.
Will new technologies lower our carbon dioxide emissions to stop global warming by 2050?
The Rise and Fall of Ponzi Schemes in America.pptxDiana Rose
Ponzi schemes, a notorious form of financial fraud, have plagued America’s investment landscape for decades. Named after Charles Ponzi, who orchestrated one of the most infamous schemes in the early 20th century, these fraudulent operations promise high returns with little or no risk, only to collapse and leave investors with significant losses. This article explores the nature of Ponzi schemes, notable cases in American history, their impact on victims, and measures to prevent falling prey to such scams.
Understanding Ponzi Schemes
A Ponzi scheme is an investment scam where returns are paid to earlier investors using the capital from newer investors, rather than from legitimate profit earned. The scheme relies on a constant influx of new investments to continue paying the promised returns. Eventually, when the flow of new money slows down or stops, the scheme collapses, leaving the majority of investors with substantial financial losses.
Historical Context: Charles Ponzi and His Legacy
Charles Ponzi is the namesake of this deceptive practice. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors in Boston a 50% return within 45 days or 100% return in 90 days through arbitrage of international reply coupons. Initially, he paid returns as promised, not from profits, but from the investments of new participants. When his scheme unraveled, it resulted in losses exceeding $20 million (equivalent to about $270 million today).
Notable American Ponzi Schemes
1. Bernie Madoff: Perhaps the most notorious Ponzi scheme in recent history, Bernie Madoff’s fraud involved $65 billion. Madoff, a well-respected figure in the financial industry, promised steady, high returns through a secretive investment strategy. His scheme lasted for decades before collapsing in 2008, devastating thousands of investors, including individuals, charities, and institutional clients.
2. Allen Stanford: Through his company, Stanford Financial Group, Allen Stanford orchestrated a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, luring investors with fraudulent certificates of deposit issued by his offshore bank. Stanford promised high returns and lavish lifestyle benefits to his investors, which ultimately led to a 110-year prison sentence for the financier in 2012.
3. Tom Petters: In a scheme that lasted more than a decade, Tom Petters ran a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme, using his company, Petters Group Worldwide. He claimed to buy and sell consumer electronics, but in reality, he used new investments to pay off old debts and fund his extravagant lifestyle. Petters was convicted in 2009 and sentenced to 50 years in prison.
4. Eric Dalius and Saivian: Eric Dalius, a prominent figure behind Saivian, a cashback program promising high returns, is under scrutiny for allegedly orchestrating a Ponzi scheme. Saivian enticed investors with promises of up to 20% cash back on everyday purchases. However, investigations suggest that the returns were paid using new investments rather than legitimate profits. The collapse of Saivian l
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck mari...Donc Test
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance36 Crypto
Learn in-depth about Dogecoin's trajectory and stay informed with 36crypto's essential and up-to-date information about the crypto space.
Our presentation delves into Dogecoin's potential future, exploring whether it's destined to skyrocket to the moon or face a downward spiral. In addition, it highlights invaluable insights. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your crypto understanding!
https://36crypto.com/the-future-of-dogecoin-how-high-can-this-cryptocurrency-reach/
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcripttscdzuip
办理美国UNCC毕业证书制作北卡大学夏洛特分校假文凭定制Q微168899991做UNCC留信网教留服认证海牙认证改UNCC成绩单GPA做UNCC假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请北卡罗莱纳大学夏洛特分校University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
Abhay Bhutada, the Managing Director of Poonawalla Fincorp Limited, is an accomplished leader with over 15 years of experience in commercial and retail lending. A Qualified Chartered Accountant, he has been pivotal in leveraging technology to enhance financial services. Starting his career at Bank of India, he later founded TAB Capital Limited and co-founded Poonawalla Finance Private Limited, emphasizing digital lending. Under his leadership, Poonawalla Fincorp achieved a 'AAA' credit rating, integrating acquisitions and emphasizing corporate governance. Actively involved in industry forums and CSR initiatives, Abhay has been recognized with awards like "Young Entrepreneur of India 2017" and "40 under 40 Most Influential Leader for 2020-21." Personally, he values mindfulness, enjoys gardening, yoga, and sees every day as an opportunity for growth and improvement.
Economic Risk Factor Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
May’s reports showed signs of continued economic growth, said Sam Millette, director, fixed income, in his latest Economic Risk Factor Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
KYC Compliance: A Cornerstone of Global Crypto Regulatory FrameworksAny kyc Account
This presentation explores the pivotal role of KYC compliance in shaping and enforcing global regulations within the dynamic landscape of cryptocurrencies. Dive into the intricate connection between KYC practices and the evolving legal frameworks governing the crypto industry.
KYC Compliance: A Cornerstone of Global Crypto Regulatory Frameworks
HIGH INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
1. HIGH INFLATION & EMPLOYMENT,
INTEREST INCREASES,
then RECESSION?
Paul H. Carr
2. HIGH INFLATION & EMPLOYMENT, INTEREST INCREASES, then RECESSION?
How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and low unemployment?
Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save US from defaulting?
3. 3.5 % unemployment 10 years after 2009 depression. Only 2 years after 2020 depression.
Depressions
14. Most wage earners are complaining
about the fact that their increased
wages have not kept up with inflation.
Do they realize that without the
inflationary government stimulus, that
they would most likely have been
unemployed?
15. Since 2000, the Fed has met its goal of 2% inflation
In 1980 some professionals believed it was
impossible for the Fed to decrease the 14% inflation
18. INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and high
employment?
Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed’s recent increase in interest
rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
19. GDP has been declining for the last two quarters? Recession?
20. During the 2020 recession, investors bought gold, but not recently.
21.
22. INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and high
employment?
Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save us?
26. The Dot-Com boom, plus tax increases, and lower
government spending fueled the 2000 budget surplus.
1998-
2001
Surplu
s
1998-
2001
Surplus
27. KEYSIAN ECONOMICS
1. During a recession, the
government should temporarily
increase spending financed by
increased debt.
2.We are not reducing National
debt now that recessions are over.
28. INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and high
employment?
Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save us?
29. MODERN MONETARY THEORY ??
Former Chair of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan (1987-2006)
once said, "The United States can pay any debt it has because we
can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of
default.”
But printing money lowers its value; its’ inflationary.
In 2006, when there were indications that risky sub-
prime mortgages would bring about the second worst
recession, Greenspan said something like,
“Don’t worry, our banking system is managed by
professionals who know what they are doing.”
These professionals had bundled risky investments
with stable government bonds.
It didn’t work!
30. INCREASING DEBT LEGACY
An increase in interest rates of 1 percentage
point above projected rates, according to
Brian Riedl of the Manhattan Institute, would
raise interest payments by $30 trillion
through 2051, and at that time the payments
would be equal to 70 percent of all tax
revenue.
An increase of 2 percentage points would
mean that interest payments would equal
100 percent of all tax revenue in 2051.
31. INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
How well is the Federal Reserve meeting its goals of 2% inflation and high
employment?
Might there be a tradeoff?
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save us?
32. Would you pay higher taxes to reduce the us public debt?
33. New revenue from the 2022 Inflation
and Climate Act will reduce the US
debt by $274 B in 10 years.
34. CONCLUSION: INFLATION, EMPLOYMENT, then RECESSION?
TRADEOFF: Lowest 3.5% unemployment in over 40 years, but highest inflation, and
highest increase in US debt.
Will the Fed's increasing interest rates drive us into a recession?
Will increasing interest rates lead the US to default on its escalating national debt?
Would you pay higher taxes to save us?
Editor's Notes
Source:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Release:
Employment Situation
Units:
Percent, Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Monthly
The unemployment rate represents the number of unemployed as a percentage of the labor force. Labor force data are restricted to people 16 years of age and older, who currently reside in 1 of the 50 states or the District of Columbia, who do not reside in institutions (e.g., penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.
This rate is also defined as the U-3 measure of labor underutilization.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
The source code is: LNS14000000
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Unemployment Rate [UNRATE],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE,
August 10, 2022.
Source:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Release:
Employment Situation
Units:
Percent, Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Monthly
The unemployment rate represents the number of unemployed as a percentage of the labor force. Labor force data are restricted to people 16 years of age and older, who currently reside in 1 of the 50 states or the District of Columbia, who do not reside in institutions (e.g., penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.
This rate is also defined as the U-3 measure of labor underutilization.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
The source code is: LNS14000000
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Unemployment Rate [UNRATE],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE,
August 10, 2022.
Source:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Release:
H.15 Selected Interest Rates
Units:
Percent, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Daily, 7-Day
For additional historical federal funds rate data, please see Daily Federal Funds Rate from 1928-1954.The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions trade federal funds (balances held at Federal Reserve Banks) with each other overnight. When a depository institution has surplus balances in its reserve account, it lends to other banks in need of larger balances. In simpler terms, a bank with excess cash, which is often referred to as liquidity, will lend to another bank that needs to quickly raise liquidity. (1) The rate that the borrowing institution pays to the lending institution is determined between the two banks; the weighted average rate for all of these types of negotiations is called the effective federal funds rate.(2) The effective federal funds rate is essentially determined by the market but is influenced by the Federal Reserve through open market operations to reach the federal funds rate target.(2)The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets eight times a year to determine the federal funds target rate. As previously stated, this rate influences the effective federal funds rate through open market operations or by buying and selling of government bonds (government debt).(2) More specifically, the Federal Reserve decreases liquidity by selling government bonds, thereby raising the federal funds rate because banks have less liquidity to trade with other banks. Similarly, the Federal Reserve can increase liquidity by buying government bonds, decreasing the federal funds rate because banks have excess liquidity for trade. Whether the Federal Reserve wants to buy or sell bonds depends on the state of the economy. If the FOMC believes the economy is growing too fast and inflation pressures are inconsistent with the dual mandate of the Federal Reserve, the Committee may set a higher federal funds rate target to temper economic activity. In the opposing scenario, the FOMC may set a lower federal funds rate target to spur greater economic activity. Therefore, the FOMC must observe the current state of the economy to determine the best course of monetary policy that will maximize economic growth while adhering to the dual mandate set forth by Congress. In making its monetary policy decisions, the FOMC considers a wealth of economic data, such as: trends in prices and wages, employment, consumer spending and income, business investments, and foreign exchange markets.The federal funds rate is the central interest rate in the U.S. financial market. It influences other interest rates such as the prime rate, which is the rate banks charge their customers with higher credit ratings. Additionally, the federal funds rate indirectly influences longer- term interest rates such as mortgages, loans, and savings, all of which are very important to consumer wealth and confidence.(2)References(1) Federal Reserve Bank of New York. "Federal funds." Fedpoints, August 2007.(2) Monetary Policy, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US),
Federal Funds Effective Rate [DFF],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFF,
August 9, 2022.
Source:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Release:
H.15 Selected Interest Rates
Units:
Percent, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Daily
For further information regarding treasury constant maturity data, please refer to the H.15 Statistical Release notes and Treasury Yield Curve Methodology.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US),
Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity, Quoted on an Investment Basis [DGS10],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10,
August 9, 2022.
Source:
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Fiscal Service
Release:
Treasury Bulletin
Units:
Millions of Dollars, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Quarterly, End of Period
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Fiscal Service,
Federal Debt: Total Public Debt [GFDEBTN],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEBTN,
August 10, 2022.
Source:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Release:
H.15 Selected Interest Rates
Units:
Percent, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Daily, 7-Day
For additional historical federal funds rate data, please see Daily Federal Funds Rate from 1928-1954.The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions trade federal funds (balances held at Federal Reserve Banks) with each other overnight. When a depository institution has surplus balances in its reserve account, it lends to other banks in need of larger balances. In simpler terms, a bank with excess cash, which is often referred to as liquidity, will lend to another bank that needs to quickly raise liquidity. (1) The rate that the borrowing institution pays to the lending institution is determined between the two banks; the weighted average rate for all of these types of negotiations is called the effective federal funds rate.(2) The effective federal funds rate is essentially determined by the market but is influenced by the Federal Reserve through open market operations to reach the federal funds rate target.(2)The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets eight times a year to determine the federal funds target rate. As previously stated, this rate influences the effective federal funds rate through open market operations or by buying and selling of government bonds (government debt).(2) More specifically, the Federal Reserve decreases liquidity by selling government bonds, thereby raising the federal funds rate because banks have less liquidity to trade with other banks. Similarly, the Federal Reserve can increase liquidity by buying government bonds, decreasing the federal funds rate because banks have excess liquidity for trade. Whether the Federal Reserve wants to buy or sell bonds depends on the state of the economy. If the FOMC believes the economy is growing too fast and inflation pressures are inconsistent with the dual mandate of the Federal Reserve, the Committee may set a higher federal funds rate target to temper economic activity. In the opposing scenario, the FOMC may set a lower federal funds rate target to spur greater economic activity. Therefore, the FOMC must observe the current state of the economy to determine the best course of monetary policy that will maximize economic growth while adhering to the dual mandate set forth by Congress. In making its monetary policy decisions, the FOMC considers a wealth of economic data, such as: trends in prices and wages, employment, consumer spending and income, business investments, and foreign exchange markets.The federal funds rate is the central interest rate in the U.S. financial market. It influences other interest rates such as the prime rate, which is the rate banks charge their customers with higher credit ratings. Additionally, the federal funds rate indirectly influences longer- term interest rates such as mortgages, loans, and savings, all of which are very important to consumer wealth and confidence.(2)References(1) Federal Reserve Bank of New York. "Federal funds." Fedpoints, August 2007.(2) Monetary Policy, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US),
Federal Funds Effective Rate [DFF],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFF,
August 9, 2022.
Source:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Release:
H.15 Selected Interest Rates
Units:
Percent, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Daily
For further information regarding treasury constant maturity data, please refer to the H.15 Statistical Release notes and Treasury Yield Curve Methodology.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US),
Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity, Quoted on an Investment Basis [DGS10],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10,
August 9, 2022.
Source:
Chicago Board Options Exchange
Release:
CBOE Market Statistics
Units:
Index, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Daily, Close
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are shares of trusts that hold portfolios of stocks designed to closely track the price performance and yield of specific indices. Copyright, 2016, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Reprinted with permission.
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
CBOE Gold ETF Volatility Index [GVZCLS],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GVZCLS,
August 10, 2022.
Source:
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Fiscal Service
Release:
Treasury Bulletin
Units:
Millions of Dollars, Not Seasonally Adjusted
Frequency:
Quarterly, End of Period
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Fiscal Service,
Federal Debt: Total Public Debt [GFDEBTN],
retrieved from FRED,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis;
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEBTN,
August 10, 2022.