This document analyzes how green agricultural policies can be designed and implemented to reduce poverty in developing countries. It examines over 20 projects in 17 countries that tested policies like payments for environmental services, subsidies, community-based natural resource management, and training programs. The key findings are that policies should target the poorest, make participation easy, and consider local economic, social and cultural factors like credit access, property rights, labor markets, and institutions. Policies also need complementary initiatives to address market issues and should allow flexibility in options to match individual circumstances. With smart, informed design that addresses these issues, green agricultural policies can help alleviate poverty while also achieving environmental goals.
This document discusses mainstreaming climate-smart agriculture (CSA) into national policies and programs. It emphasizes adopting a "no-regrets" approach that improves current practices while increasing resilience to climate change. Key points discussed include identifying CSA policies that bring productivity gains and reduced emissions; providing incentives that support CSA adoption; and establishing coordination mechanisms and legal frameworks to implement CSA strategies at all levels of government. The document argues that mainstreaming CSA requires aligning policies, budgets, and responsibilities across agencies from national to local levels.
This document discusses green growth and its importance for developing countries. It argues that governments can achieve sustainable economic growth and social stability by making green growth a central part of development strategies. Green growth aims to ensure human well-being and continued natural resource provision for future generations. The document outlines a three-step agenda for countries to establish leadership on green growth, design policies that incentivize it, and strengthen governance to effectively implement those policies. International cooperation is also needed to promote areas like green technology and trade.
Climate change is negatively impacting agriculture in Uganda, which provides livelihoods for over 70% of the population. Rising temperatures and shifts in rainfall patterns have led to crop failures, water shortages, and deaths of animals and people from starvation. To address this, Uganda needs financing for climate-smart agriculture practices that sustainably increase productivity while building resilience and reducing emissions. However, climate change funding is limited given other development needs. Uganda should pursue funding from international climate funds and carbon markets, working with organizations like the World Bank and FAO to implement collaborative climate action in line with its commitments under the Paris Agreement.
Global Warming Impacts on the Acievement of the Milennium Development GoalsZ3P
This document discusses the need to integrate efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with actions to address climate change. It argues that climate change threatens progress on the MDGs by negatively impacting livelihoods in developing countries. While some governments and organizations have recognized this, climate change is still often treated as separate from MDG implementation. The document calls on the UN high-level meeting on the MDGs to promote greater policy integration between the MDGs and climate change adaptation/mitigation and to ensure adequate funding for climate actions in developing countries.
The document discusses key actions needed to make agriculture more sustainable and resilient to climate change. It summarizes that agricultural policies and investments must be integrated into climate and development goals. Specifically, it calls for raising global investment in sustainable agriculture, intensifying production sustainably while reducing emissions, assisting vulnerable populations, shaping food systems to ensure nutrition, reducing food loss and waste, and decreasing differences between rich and poor countries.
Climate change in Uganda: Insights for long-term adaptation and building comm...Dr. Joshua Zake
This briefing paper highlights key challenges and issues for
consideration in policy development and planning processes at
community, local, national and regional levels towards creating
awareness and building resilience to climate change impacts in
Uganda. It’s an output from a review of various documents and
literature on climate change impacts and responses in Uganda
and else where. Furthermore, it’s informed by Environmental
Alert’s experiences and lessons generated through facilitating
initiatives to support climate change adaptation at community
and local levels particularly in the West Nile region (in the districts
of Adjumani, Moyo and Yumbe) and Lukwanga Parish in Wakiso
district, Central region of Uganda; and also targeted engagement
with key policy and decision makers at all levels including local,
national, regional and international on issues of climate change. It
is targeting key stakeholders at all levels (including local leaders,
Government, Development Partners, Civil Society, Policy Makers,
Political Leaders, Private Sector, Academia, Research Institutions,
Cultural and Faith Based Leaders and Communities among others;
to mainstream, prioritize and support climate change adaptation
actions at all levels of planning and development.
Executive Order 26 requires all students and government employees to plant a minimum of 10 seedlings per year to support the Aquino administration's goal of growing 1.5 billion trees over six years as part of the National Greening Program. The program aims to plant 1.5 billion trees across 1.5 million hectares of land to help with poverty reduction, resource conservation, climate change mitigation and other priorities. It consolidates existing greening efforts and requires various government agencies and educational institutions to produce seedlings while providing technical support for planting and maintaining the trees.
This document discusses the importance of transitioning to a green economy in the face of climate change and its impacts. It notes that climate change has resulted in many natural disasters and losses around the world. All countries need to commit to implementing green economic development strategies that use environmentally friendly materials. While international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol have addressed this issue, action and implementation has been weak due to economic interests. A green economy approach is urgently needed and all people have a right and responsibility to preserve the environment.
This document discusses mainstreaming climate-smart agriculture (CSA) into national policies and programs. It emphasizes adopting a "no-regrets" approach that improves current practices while increasing resilience to climate change. Key points discussed include identifying CSA policies that bring productivity gains and reduced emissions; providing incentives that support CSA adoption; and establishing coordination mechanisms and legal frameworks to implement CSA strategies at all levels of government. The document argues that mainstreaming CSA requires aligning policies, budgets, and responsibilities across agencies from national to local levels.
This document discusses green growth and its importance for developing countries. It argues that governments can achieve sustainable economic growth and social stability by making green growth a central part of development strategies. Green growth aims to ensure human well-being and continued natural resource provision for future generations. The document outlines a three-step agenda for countries to establish leadership on green growth, design policies that incentivize it, and strengthen governance to effectively implement those policies. International cooperation is also needed to promote areas like green technology and trade.
Climate change is negatively impacting agriculture in Uganda, which provides livelihoods for over 70% of the population. Rising temperatures and shifts in rainfall patterns have led to crop failures, water shortages, and deaths of animals and people from starvation. To address this, Uganda needs financing for climate-smart agriculture practices that sustainably increase productivity while building resilience and reducing emissions. However, climate change funding is limited given other development needs. Uganda should pursue funding from international climate funds and carbon markets, working with organizations like the World Bank and FAO to implement collaborative climate action in line with its commitments under the Paris Agreement.
Global Warming Impacts on the Acievement of the Milennium Development GoalsZ3P
This document discusses the need to integrate efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with actions to address climate change. It argues that climate change threatens progress on the MDGs by negatively impacting livelihoods in developing countries. While some governments and organizations have recognized this, climate change is still often treated as separate from MDG implementation. The document calls on the UN high-level meeting on the MDGs to promote greater policy integration between the MDGs and climate change adaptation/mitigation and to ensure adequate funding for climate actions in developing countries.
The document discusses key actions needed to make agriculture more sustainable and resilient to climate change. It summarizes that agricultural policies and investments must be integrated into climate and development goals. Specifically, it calls for raising global investment in sustainable agriculture, intensifying production sustainably while reducing emissions, assisting vulnerable populations, shaping food systems to ensure nutrition, reducing food loss and waste, and decreasing differences between rich and poor countries.
Climate change in Uganda: Insights for long-term adaptation and building comm...Dr. Joshua Zake
This briefing paper highlights key challenges and issues for
consideration in policy development and planning processes at
community, local, national and regional levels towards creating
awareness and building resilience to climate change impacts in
Uganda. It’s an output from a review of various documents and
literature on climate change impacts and responses in Uganda
and else where. Furthermore, it’s informed by Environmental
Alert’s experiences and lessons generated through facilitating
initiatives to support climate change adaptation at community
and local levels particularly in the West Nile region (in the districts
of Adjumani, Moyo and Yumbe) and Lukwanga Parish in Wakiso
district, Central region of Uganda; and also targeted engagement
with key policy and decision makers at all levels including local,
national, regional and international on issues of climate change. It
is targeting key stakeholders at all levels (including local leaders,
Government, Development Partners, Civil Society, Policy Makers,
Political Leaders, Private Sector, Academia, Research Institutions,
Cultural and Faith Based Leaders and Communities among others;
to mainstream, prioritize and support climate change adaptation
actions at all levels of planning and development.
Executive Order 26 requires all students and government employees to plant a minimum of 10 seedlings per year to support the Aquino administration's goal of growing 1.5 billion trees over six years as part of the National Greening Program. The program aims to plant 1.5 billion trees across 1.5 million hectares of land to help with poverty reduction, resource conservation, climate change mitigation and other priorities. It consolidates existing greening efforts and requires various government agencies and educational institutions to produce seedlings while providing technical support for planting and maintaining the trees.
This document discusses the importance of transitioning to a green economy in the face of climate change and its impacts. It notes that climate change has resulted in many natural disasters and losses around the world. All countries need to commit to implementing green economic development strategies that use environmentally friendly materials. While international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol have addressed this issue, action and implementation has been weak due to economic interests. A green economy approach is urgently needed and all people have a right and responsibility to preserve the environment.
Climate Impacts, Forest Dependent Rural Livelihoods and Adaptation Strategies...Z3P
This document reviews the impacts of climate change on forests and rural livelihoods in Africa. It discusses how over half of Africa's population relies on forests for livelihoods and that climate impacts like changes in temperature and rainfall patterns can significantly affect forest ecosystems and the goods and services they provide which rural communities depend on. The review examines cases of climate impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation strategies identified in African countries' reports to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
1) Climate-related shocks like droughts, floods, and food price spikes currently push people into poverty and prevent them from escaping it. These shocks will be exacerbated by climate change, potentially pushing over 100 million more people into poverty by 2030.
2) Rapid, inclusive development with policies like universal healthcare, strengthened social protections, climate-smart agriculture, and financial inclusion can prevent most additional poverty due to climate change by 2030. Without such development, over 100 million more people could fall into poverty.
3) Immediate emissions reductions are needed to avoid dangerous long-term climate change that could threaten global poverty reduction goals, even with adaptation. However, mitigation policies should be designed to benefit
The document discusses sustainable development and climate change issues in India. It notes that while India has strongly accepted the science of climate change, more action is needed on multilateral agreements. It outlines key challenges like increasing population, urbanization, and growing demands on land and water resources. However, India has also made progress through policies promoting renewable energy, poverty reduction, and literacy. The document discusses international collaboration through conferences like Rio+20 and efforts to set targets and provide finance and technology to developing countries.
The presentation is designed to let the public know what Ethiopia has undertaken and must undertake to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts. And how the act now, act differently and act together motto should be interpreted at national level. The presentation is a personal reflection on the topic after taking the course organized by World Bank Group on the topic Turn down the heat why a 40c warmer world must be avoided.
Welcome to our presentation on developmentSamin Yeaser
This document provides an overview of desertification and policies in Bangladesh to address it. It begins with definitions of desertification and discusses driving forces of land degradation in Bangladesh such as inefficient irrigation, imbalanced fertilizer use, improper pesticide use, and unplanned rural infrastructure. Statistics are presented on desertification causes both natural and human-caused. The presentation outlines specific causes accelerating desertification in Bangladesh and lists advisory committees. It then describes seven key policies that Bangladesh has implemented to deal with environmental issues like desertification by addressing land degradation, soil erosion, deforestation, and water resources. The outputs, strategies for mitigating desertification and alleviating poverty, and actions to prevent desertification are summarized.
This document discusses the role of economic policies in protecting the environment in Pakistan. It outlines that both market failures and inappropriate economic policies have contributed significantly to Pakistan's environmental problems, such as water pollution, air pollution, deforestation, and degradation of agricultural lands. Specifically, subsidies on irrigation water and agricultural inputs have incentivized overuse of resources. Poverty and rapid population growth have also put pressure on Pakistan's natural resources and exacerbated environmental issues. The document analyzes how different economic policies have impacted both "brown" environmental problems and "green" issues affecting agriculture, forests, and rangelands in Pakistan.
Integrating Environmental Accounting in Agro-Allied and Manufacturing Indust...IJMER
ONLY WHEN THE LAST TREE IS CUT, ONLY WHEN THE LAST RIVER IS POLLUTED, ONLY WHEN THE LAST FISH IS CAUGHT, ONLY THEN WILL THEY REALIZE THAT YOU CANNOT EAT MONEY’ American proverb
Due to growing awareness and concern on the impact of human activity on the ecosystem, there is an
increasing trend to judge organizations in relation to the community in which it operates. The impact of the activities on the environment with regard to pollution of water, air, land and abuse of natural resources are coming under scrutiny of governments, stakeholders and citizens. Education is considered the key to effective development strategies and TVET institutions then must be the master
key that can alleviate poverty, promote peace, conserve the environment, improve the quality of life
for all and help achieve sustainable development. Unless proper accounting work is done, it cannot be determined that both have been fulfilling their responsibilities. The aim of the study was to explore whether distinctive processes of environmental accounting are possible in agro-allied and
manufacturing industries with a view to enhancing sustainability. To accomplish this aim, this research explores environmental accountability practices in TVET institutions. This paper is in part of an exploratory research project and it is limited in that it attempts to be illuminative and theoretically driven. The paper aims to prove that environmental reporting and disclosure will
enable in agro-allied and manufacturing industries undertake a major transformation that includes
approaches that harmonize economic prosperity, environmental conservation and social well-being.
However, while strategies for achieving this goal are not widespread, a range of international experiences is beginning to suggest ways forward. These initiatives include national TVET policy reforms, green campus, green curriculum, green community, green research and green culture. The paper includes suggested templates that can be useful in agro-allied and manufacturing industries
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PUBLIC’S OPINION ON GLOBAL WARMING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVE...Sri Sathya Sai University
This study examined public awareness of and engagement with global warming and sustainable development in Shimla, India. A survey was administered to a stratified random sample of residents from different demographic groups. Statistical analysis found relationships between demographic factors like age, gender, occupation and education level and levels of environmental awareness and participation in eco-friendly initiatives. The study aims to enhance understanding and action around global warming issues in India by informing education and outreach efforts. Overall results indicate that while awareness of global warming exists, knowledge of its causes and impacts is still limited and efforts are needed to increase understanding and encourage greater public involvement in mitigation.
1) Adaptation to climate change involves managing risks through reducing vulnerability. Risks can be systemic like impacts on energy, agriculture, and sea level rise, or idiosyncratic. Vulnerability depends on exposure and ability to manage risks.
2) Changing behaviors to adapt requires both awareness of impacts and willingness to contribute to social goals. Factors like social norms, costs, and preferences influence willingness.
3) Civil society has an important role in leading adaptation by advising on plans and overseeing implementation. The Joint Principles for Adaptation provide guidelines for inclusive planning, accountability, flexibility, and support for vulnerable groups.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – Environmental Protection or Creating ...Shahadat Hossain Shakil
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – Environmental Protection or Creating Disguise?
The promotion of environmental responsibility amongst transnational corporations (TNCs) has become an important topic of debate in recent years. While government regulation might achieve environmental goals in a blunt manner, business community argues that voluntary measures can achieve them in a more efficient way (Utting and Marques 2010; Clapp 2005). One of the commercial drivers of private forms of (self) regulation, such as ISO 14001 standards, is desired to keep smaller firms out of profitable markets by raising the barrier to entry and increasing the costs of compliance with standards (Clapp, 1998, cited in Newell and Levy 2006).
Tobacco companies for instance claim that they are engaged in CSR because of being concerned corporate citizens. In reality, CSR activities cost tobacco companies very little in relation to their annual profits. In 2009, British American Tobacco (BAT) spent USD $22.3 million on CSR compared to the USD $4.8 billion it earned in profits (TFK 2011).
BAT runs several CSR program in Bangladesh notably, Afforestation Program - to offset the deforestation (30% of the country total; TFK, 2011) caused during tobacco drying and Sustainable Agriculture - to minimize the environmental degradation (BATB 2010; Ahmed 2012). Which are greatly outweighed by the detrimental effects of smoking and now illegal in Bangladesh as a signatory of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO 2013).
On the other hand, ‘[c]corporations performed as shapers and negotiators of environmental rules as well as play central position in informal governance of the environment that derives from their daily operations. Corporations play multiple and potentially conflicting roles as lobbyists, experts, (self) regulators and providers of the capital and technologies necessary to realize environmental policy goals’ (Newell and Levy 2006).
In contrast, recent years have seen a number of cases of ‘accidental’ or ‘unintentional’ releases of genetically modified organisms (StarLink, Bt10 maize, Liberty Link RICE 601). Behavior of the firms responsible for the illegal releases in these three cases raises important questions about the effectiveness of voluntary corporate responsibility measures. Which demands strong regulatory rules to incorporate regular external monitoring and oversight by governments, as well as more stringent penalties and assignment of legal liability, alongside voluntary codes (Clapp 2008).
This document summarizes key points about climate change adaptation from a paper by Dr. Sarah Ahmed. It discusses the vulnerability of developing countries to climate change impacts, the need to enhance adaptive capacity. Adaptation measures include policy, technology, monitoring, and risk sharing. Estimates suggest adaptation will cost $86-100 billion annually by 2015. Accurate cost information is essential for policymaking but difficult to obtain. The document then outlines India's National Action Plan on Climate Change and its focus on both mitigation and adaptation through various missions and sectors. Adaptation costs in India are estimated to be 0.88-2.17% of GDP from 2004-2007.
This document proposes a pilot project for agricultural land reform in Canada that would redistribute land from large farms to small farms and individuals wanting to farm. It begins by outlining issues with the current agricultural system such as environmental degradation and the impacts of climate change and globalization. The proposed project would give land to farmers committing to sustainable organic practices in York Region, Ontario as a starting point. Implementation would require partnerships with environmental and agricultural advocacy groups to push for the project given limitations of the current political climate. Challenges include the neoliberal priorities of the Canadian government and obstacles to large-scale interventionist policies.
Forests cover one third of the earth's land mass and provide vital functions, yet 13 million hectares are destroyed annually. A transition to a green economy will happen through design or default, and forests can be at the heart of sustainable development and green economies through political commitment and $30 billion investment to fight deforestation. UNEP works to increase awareness of forests' key role in building a greener future through the 2011 International Year of Forests and further supports forest transformation through catalyzing discussion, generating knowledge, supporting ecosystem management, and advocating paths and investments.
Climate change in context of sustainable developmentsajid ali
Climate change poses threats to global food production, ecosystems, and human settlements. Developing countries are especially vulnerable due to their dependence on agriculture and limited capabilities. The document discusses the relationship between climate change and sustainable development, noting they are interconnected issues. It examines how factors like agriculture, human population, energy, poverty, and food insecurity relate to sustainable development and are impacted by climate change. The literature review discusses several sources that also explore the linkages between climate change and sustainable development and sustainable development's role in mitigating climate change impacts.
The document discusses the history and evolution of sustainable consumption from the 1970s to present day. It outlines key international agreements and goals related to sustainable consumption, including reducing resource use and pollution while improving quality of life. The document argues that while progress has been made conceptually, substantive achievements have been modest. It proposes that Asian countries can play a lead role in sustainable consumption 2.0 through various policy approaches and social changes.
What is Green Finance? How to structure a market to attrach green investments? Which are the instruments and mechanism to make it succesfull operative and monitorable?
Economics Of Environmental SustainabilityMasood Zaidi
This document discusses the economics of environmental sustainability. It defines economics and the linkages between the economy and the environment. Production and consumption utilize resources from the environment and generate residuals. The concept of environmental sustainability is introduced as meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Various views on environmentalism and concerns about depletion of resources are examined.
Achieving Sustainable Food Security: New Trends and Emerging AgendaShenggen Fan
The document summarizes key challenges to achieving global food security goals and proposes a new agenda. It finds that progress on reducing hunger is insufficient and emerging trends like population growth, resource constraints, and climate change present further difficulties. A new agenda is urgently needed and should involve investing in agriculture, keeping trade open, establishing productive safety nets, adapting to and mitigating climate change, and strengthening institutions. Meeting food security goals will require effective country-led strategies that incorporate these elements.
Sustainibilie development in agriculture sector in indiajoysengupta22
The document discusses sustainable development in India's agricultural sector. It analyzes traditional, modern, and sustainable agricultural systems across ecological, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability. Agriculture is important for India's economy and food security, but current practices face sustainability issues. The document recommends promoting sustainable practices like organic matter retention, biodiversity, and small-scale labor intensity to increase long-term ecological, economic, and social sustainability in Indian agriculture.
Emerging technology trends for the entrepreneurBala Iyer
The document discusses major technology trends for entrepreneurial leaders to understand, including:
1. The rise of utility platforms and platform-based competition which rewards agility
2. The disintegration of organizational boundaries through digital spaces which can lower costs
3. The explosion of data enabling personalization through analytics for customer satisfaction
4. The increasingly connected world through networks which provides access to resources
5. Knowledge is being democratized through open sources rewarding learning organizations
Global Food Security Challenges and Opportunities: the new role of agricultureShenggen Fan
Global food security faces complex challenges such as food price volatility, population growth, and climate change. A comprehensive strategy is needed to address these challenges and protect the poor. Agriculture, especially small-scale farming, must play a new role in achieving broader development outcomes such as improving nutrition, promoting climate change adaptation, building conflict resilience, and narrowing gender gaps.
Climate Impacts, Forest Dependent Rural Livelihoods and Adaptation Strategies...Z3P
This document reviews the impacts of climate change on forests and rural livelihoods in Africa. It discusses how over half of Africa's population relies on forests for livelihoods and that climate impacts like changes in temperature and rainfall patterns can significantly affect forest ecosystems and the goods and services they provide which rural communities depend on. The review examines cases of climate impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation strategies identified in African countries' reports to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
1) Climate-related shocks like droughts, floods, and food price spikes currently push people into poverty and prevent them from escaping it. These shocks will be exacerbated by climate change, potentially pushing over 100 million more people into poverty by 2030.
2) Rapid, inclusive development with policies like universal healthcare, strengthened social protections, climate-smart agriculture, and financial inclusion can prevent most additional poverty due to climate change by 2030. Without such development, over 100 million more people could fall into poverty.
3) Immediate emissions reductions are needed to avoid dangerous long-term climate change that could threaten global poverty reduction goals, even with adaptation. However, mitigation policies should be designed to benefit
The document discusses sustainable development and climate change issues in India. It notes that while India has strongly accepted the science of climate change, more action is needed on multilateral agreements. It outlines key challenges like increasing population, urbanization, and growing demands on land and water resources. However, India has also made progress through policies promoting renewable energy, poverty reduction, and literacy. The document discusses international collaboration through conferences like Rio+20 and efforts to set targets and provide finance and technology to developing countries.
The presentation is designed to let the public know what Ethiopia has undertaken and must undertake to mitigate and adapt to climate impacts. And how the act now, act differently and act together motto should be interpreted at national level. The presentation is a personal reflection on the topic after taking the course organized by World Bank Group on the topic Turn down the heat why a 40c warmer world must be avoided.
Welcome to our presentation on developmentSamin Yeaser
This document provides an overview of desertification and policies in Bangladesh to address it. It begins with definitions of desertification and discusses driving forces of land degradation in Bangladesh such as inefficient irrigation, imbalanced fertilizer use, improper pesticide use, and unplanned rural infrastructure. Statistics are presented on desertification causes both natural and human-caused. The presentation outlines specific causes accelerating desertification in Bangladesh and lists advisory committees. It then describes seven key policies that Bangladesh has implemented to deal with environmental issues like desertification by addressing land degradation, soil erosion, deforestation, and water resources. The outputs, strategies for mitigating desertification and alleviating poverty, and actions to prevent desertification are summarized.
This document discusses the role of economic policies in protecting the environment in Pakistan. It outlines that both market failures and inappropriate economic policies have contributed significantly to Pakistan's environmental problems, such as water pollution, air pollution, deforestation, and degradation of agricultural lands. Specifically, subsidies on irrigation water and agricultural inputs have incentivized overuse of resources. Poverty and rapid population growth have also put pressure on Pakistan's natural resources and exacerbated environmental issues. The document analyzes how different economic policies have impacted both "brown" environmental problems and "green" issues affecting agriculture, forests, and rangelands in Pakistan.
Integrating Environmental Accounting in Agro-Allied and Manufacturing Indust...IJMER
ONLY WHEN THE LAST TREE IS CUT, ONLY WHEN THE LAST RIVER IS POLLUTED, ONLY WHEN THE LAST FISH IS CAUGHT, ONLY THEN WILL THEY REALIZE THAT YOU CANNOT EAT MONEY’ American proverb
Due to growing awareness and concern on the impact of human activity on the ecosystem, there is an
increasing trend to judge organizations in relation to the community in which it operates. The impact of the activities on the environment with regard to pollution of water, air, land and abuse of natural resources are coming under scrutiny of governments, stakeholders and citizens. Education is considered the key to effective development strategies and TVET institutions then must be the master
key that can alleviate poverty, promote peace, conserve the environment, improve the quality of life
for all and help achieve sustainable development. Unless proper accounting work is done, it cannot be determined that both have been fulfilling their responsibilities. The aim of the study was to explore whether distinctive processes of environmental accounting are possible in agro-allied and
manufacturing industries with a view to enhancing sustainability. To accomplish this aim, this research explores environmental accountability practices in TVET institutions. This paper is in part of an exploratory research project and it is limited in that it attempts to be illuminative and theoretically driven. The paper aims to prove that environmental reporting and disclosure will
enable in agro-allied and manufacturing industries undertake a major transformation that includes
approaches that harmonize economic prosperity, environmental conservation and social well-being.
However, while strategies for achieving this goal are not widespread, a range of international experiences is beginning to suggest ways forward. These initiatives include national TVET policy reforms, green campus, green curriculum, green community, green research and green culture. The paper includes suggested templates that can be useful in agro-allied and manufacturing industries
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PUBLIC’S OPINION ON GLOBAL WARMING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVE...Sri Sathya Sai University
This study examined public awareness of and engagement with global warming and sustainable development in Shimla, India. A survey was administered to a stratified random sample of residents from different demographic groups. Statistical analysis found relationships between demographic factors like age, gender, occupation and education level and levels of environmental awareness and participation in eco-friendly initiatives. The study aims to enhance understanding and action around global warming issues in India by informing education and outreach efforts. Overall results indicate that while awareness of global warming exists, knowledge of its causes and impacts is still limited and efforts are needed to increase understanding and encourage greater public involvement in mitigation.
1) Adaptation to climate change involves managing risks through reducing vulnerability. Risks can be systemic like impacts on energy, agriculture, and sea level rise, or idiosyncratic. Vulnerability depends on exposure and ability to manage risks.
2) Changing behaviors to adapt requires both awareness of impacts and willingness to contribute to social goals. Factors like social norms, costs, and preferences influence willingness.
3) Civil society has an important role in leading adaptation by advising on plans and overseeing implementation. The Joint Principles for Adaptation provide guidelines for inclusive planning, accountability, flexibility, and support for vulnerable groups.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – Environmental Protection or Creating ...Shahadat Hossain Shakil
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – Environmental Protection or Creating Disguise?
The promotion of environmental responsibility amongst transnational corporations (TNCs) has become an important topic of debate in recent years. While government regulation might achieve environmental goals in a blunt manner, business community argues that voluntary measures can achieve them in a more efficient way (Utting and Marques 2010; Clapp 2005). One of the commercial drivers of private forms of (self) regulation, such as ISO 14001 standards, is desired to keep smaller firms out of profitable markets by raising the barrier to entry and increasing the costs of compliance with standards (Clapp, 1998, cited in Newell and Levy 2006).
Tobacco companies for instance claim that they are engaged in CSR because of being concerned corporate citizens. In reality, CSR activities cost tobacco companies very little in relation to their annual profits. In 2009, British American Tobacco (BAT) spent USD $22.3 million on CSR compared to the USD $4.8 billion it earned in profits (TFK 2011).
BAT runs several CSR program in Bangladesh notably, Afforestation Program - to offset the deforestation (30% of the country total; TFK, 2011) caused during tobacco drying and Sustainable Agriculture - to minimize the environmental degradation (BATB 2010; Ahmed 2012). Which are greatly outweighed by the detrimental effects of smoking and now illegal in Bangladesh as a signatory of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO 2013).
On the other hand, ‘[c]corporations performed as shapers and negotiators of environmental rules as well as play central position in informal governance of the environment that derives from their daily operations. Corporations play multiple and potentially conflicting roles as lobbyists, experts, (self) regulators and providers of the capital and technologies necessary to realize environmental policy goals’ (Newell and Levy 2006).
In contrast, recent years have seen a number of cases of ‘accidental’ or ‘unintentional’ releases of genetically modified organisms (StarLink, Bt10 maize, Liberty Link RICE 601). Behavior of the firms responsible for the illegal releases in these three cases raises important questions about the effectiveness of voluntary corporate responsibility measures. Which demands strong regulatory rules to incorporate regular external monitoring and oversight by governments, as well as more stringent penalties and assignment of legal liability, alongside voluntary codes (Clapp 2008).
This document summarizes key points about climate change adaptation from a paper by Dr. Sarah Ahmed. It discusses the vulnerability of developing countries to climate change impacts, the need to enhance adaptive capacity. Adaptation measures include policy, technology, monitoring, and risk sharing. Estimates suggest adaptation will cost $86-100 billion annually by 2015. Accurate cost information is essential for policymaking but difficult to obtain. The document then outlines India's National Action Plan on Climate Change and its focus on both mitigation and adaptation through various missions and sectors. Adaptation costs in India are estimated to be 0.88-2.17% of GDP from 2004-2007.
This document proposes a pilot project for agricultural land reform in Canada that would redistribute land from large farms to small farms and individuals wanting to farm. It begins by outlining issues with the current agricultural system such as environmental degradation and the impacts of climate change and globalization. The proposed project would give land to farmers committing to sustainable organic practices in York Region, Ontario as a starting point. Implementation would require partnerships with environmental and agricultural advocacy groups to push for the project given limitations of the current political climate. Challenges include the neoliberal priorities of the Canadian government and obstacles to large-scale interventionist policies.
Forests cover one third of the earth's land mass and provide vital functions, yet 13 million hectares are destroyed annually. A transition to a green economy will happen through design or default, and forests can be at the heart of sustainable development and green economies through political commitment and $30 billion investment to fight deforestation. UNEP works to increase awareness of forests' key role in building a greener future through the 2011 International Year of Forests and further supports forest transformation through catalyzing discussion, generating knowledge, supporting ecosystem management, and advocating paths and investments.
Climate change in context of sustainable developmentsajid ali
Climate change poses threats to global food production, ecosystems, and human settlements. Developing countries are especially vulnerable due to their dependence on agriculture and limited capabilities. The document discusses the relationship between climate change and sustainable development, noting they are interconnected issues. It examines how factors like agriculture, human population, energy, poverty, and food insecurity relate to sustainable development and are impacted by climate change. The literature review discusses several sources that also explore the linkages between climate change and sustainable development and sustainable development's role in mitigating climate change impacts.
The document discusses the history and evolution of sustainable consumption from the 1970s to present day. It outlines key international agreements and goals related to sustainable consumption, including reducing resource use and pollution while improving quality of life. The document argues that while progress has been made conceptually, substantive achievements have been modest. It proposes that Asian countries can play a lead role in sustainable consumption 2.0 through various policy approaches and social changes.
What is Green Finance? How to structure a market to attrach green investments? Which are the instruments and mechanism to make it succesfull operative and monitorable?
Economics Of Environmental SustainabilityMasood Zaidi
This document discusses the economics of environmental sustainability. It defines economics and the linkages between the economy and the environment. Production and consumption utilize resources from the environment and generate residuals. The concept of environmental sustainability is introduced as meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Various views on environmentalism and concerns about depletion of resources are examined.
Achieving Sustainable Food Security: New Trends and Emerging AgendaShenggen Fan
The document summarizes key challenges to achieving global food security goals and proposes a new agenda. It finds that progress on reducing hunger is insufficient and emerging trends like population growth, resource constraints, and climate change present further difficulties. A new agenda is urgently needed and should involve investing in agriculture, keeping trade open, establishing productive safety nets, adapting to and mitigating climate change, and strengthening institutions. Meeting food security goals will require effective country-led strategies that incorporate these elements.
Sustainibilie development in agriculture sector in indiajoysengupta22
The document discusses sustainable development in India's agricultural sector. It analyzes traditional, modern, and sustainable agricultural systems across ecological, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability. Agriculture is important for India's economy and food security, but current practices face sustainability issues. The document recommends promoting sustainable practices like organic matter retention, biodiversity, and small-scale labor intensity to increase long-term ecological, economic, and social sustainability in Indian agriculture.
Emerging technology trends for the entrepreneurBala Iyer
The document discusses major technology trends for entrepreneurial leaders to understand, including:
1. The rise of utility platforms and platform-based competition which rewards agility
2. The disintegration of organizational boundaries through digital spaces which can lower costs
3. The explosion of data enabling personalization through analytics for customer satisfaction
4. The increasingly connected world through networks which provides access to resources
5. Knowledge is being democratized through open sources rewarding learning organizations
Global Food Security Challenges and Opportunities: the new role of agricultureShenggen Fan
Global food security faces complex challenges such as food price volatility, population growth, and climate change. A comprehensive strategy is needed to address these challenges and protect the poor. Agriculture, especially small-scale farming, must play a new role in achieving broader development outcomes such as improving nutrition, promoting climate change adaptation, building conflict resilience, and narrowing gender gaps.
This document contains the authors and contact information for S. Aravindan and V. Kannan from Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts and Science in Coimbatore, India. It also summarizes several trends that may impact global business in the future, including the rising power of emerging markets, the growth of clean technology, demographic shifts transforming the global workforce, disruptive innovation, and the increasing role of data analytics and smart technology.
The document summarizes the key discussions and outcomes from the 3rd Global Science Conference on Climate-Smart Agriculture held in Montpellier, France from March 16-18, 2015. Over 600 researchers and 150 stakeholders from 75 countries discussed how agriculture can address food security, climate change adaptation and mitigation. The conference concluded that Climate-Smart Agriculture provides an important framework to develop solutions that balance these three pillars at local, regional and global levels. Participants called on policymakers to support Climate-Smart Agriculture through increased research funding, policies that integrate food security and climate goals, and ensuring agriculture has a prominent role in climate change negotiations.
The Natural Choice: Securing the value of natureGreenSpace
The document outlines the UK government's plan to better protect and improve the natural environment by facilitating more integrated and strategic action. It proposes new frameworks like Local Nature Partnerships to operate across boundaries, Nature Improvement Areas to enhance nature on a large scale, and measures to strengthen connections between people and nature, grow a green economy, and demonstrate leadership internationally on these issues.
This document provides a literature review of agricultural pollution policies and instruments. It begins by discussing different types of environmental policy instruments, including regulations, voluntary schemes, market-based instruments, and the role of education and technology. It then reviews how these instruments are used in the agricultural sector to mitigate pollution. Key knowledge gaps identified include a lack of understanding around time lags in implementing measures, farmer compliance standards, and nutrient budget management systems. The document argues that policy instruments need to balance environmental objectives with farm economic efficiency. Effective policy should be cost-effective, equitable, viable, practical, and operational for farmers without causing income losses.
Poverty alleviation and the environmental governancePari Doll
World population has grown significantly from 1.6 billion in 1900 to over 6 billion in 2003, and is projected to exceed 8 billion by 2025. This rapid population growth, combined with rising incomes in developing countries, is expected to place much greater demands on food and environmental resources. The UN has identified goals around reducing poverty and hunger and ensuring environmental sustainability. South Asia faces particular challenges due to high population density and limited natural resources per capita. Globalization is changing economies in South Asia from agriculture-based to more industrial and service-oriented. This integration risks increased environmental degradation if not managed properly. Strategic policy shifts are needed to empower the poor and engage them as partners in pro-poor environmental governance initiatives.
Enhancing farmer engagement in national climate policies: Advocay tools and a...ILRI
Presented by Romy Chevallier, AICCRA policy consultant, during a climate change workshop organized by AICCRA and the Eastern African Farmers Federation (EAFF), 6-7 December 2022
Benefits of Organic Agriculture as a Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation...x3G9
Organic agriculture has potential as both an adaptation and mitigation strategy for climate change in developing countries. As an adaptation strategy, organic agriculture builds soil organic matter and water retention, making agriculture less vulnerable to drought and extreme weather events. Organic agriculture also reduces financial risks for farmers through lower input costs and higher prices. As a mitigation strategy, organic agriculture avoids greenhouse gas emissions from synthetic fertilizers and sequesters carbon in soil organic matter through certain agricultural practices. While more research is still needed, organic agriculture shows promise as a sustainable livelihood approach that can help rural communities adapt to climate change impacts with low financial requirements.
The Rio +20 Summit will address progress on sustainable development commitments from previous summits. Key issues include the green economy and poverty reduction. Agriculture can contribute to the green economy through sustainable practices that produce more with less and minimize environmental impacts. Farmers represent half the world's poor and managing natural resources sustainably helps alleviate poverty. The summit should develop approaches to reward farmers for ecosystem services and help them adapt to issues like drought and disasters.
A review of the Ethiopian context
Presented by IWMI's Gebrehaweria Gebregziabher at a Roundtable on Building Resilience to Climate Change through Community Dialogues held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, September 20, 2016
As part of the Paris Climate Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 2oC, annual emissions reductions from agriculture must reach 1 gigatonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (GtCO2e/yr) by 2030. Plausible options to do this only deliver 21–40% of this target. Agricultural systems are witnessing ambitious goals and require transformative actions. Across food systems actions include: application of next generation technologies, increasing investment flows and improving returns, change in pattern of landholdings, enhancing capacities through skill development and capacity building, and via changes in the distribution and dynamics of the population and labour force. This transformation would generate multitude of benefits such as education, nutrition, health, water, sanitation, and empowerment of women and youth, and transforming rural livelihoods and indigenous communities.
Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) aims to sustainably increase agricultural productivity and incomes, build resilience to climate change, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Recent UNFCCC negotiations have highlighted CSA. Key actions to implement CSA include expanding the evidence base on impacts and options, supporting enabling policies, strengthening institutions, enhancing financing, and implementing practices locally. FAO promotes CSA through projects, the Global Alliance, and practices like crop diversification, alternate wetting and drying of rice, and early warning systems.
This document discusses policy approaches for mainstreaming climate-smart agriculture (CSA) into national policies and programs. It addresses identifying supportive CSA policies, providing an enabling legal and political environment, the role of prices and subsidies, incentives for CSA investments, and the role of local institutions. Key points include: identifying "no-regrets" CSA practices that improve productivity and resilience; coordinating CSA strategies across agencies and levels of government; reviewing price support and subsidies to incentivize CSA; and ensuring local institutions and participation in CSA programs and strategies.
The document discusses sustainable consumption and production patterns (SCP), which is Goal 12 of the UN's 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It provides background on SCP, noting that while recognized as important since the 1990s, it was not addressed by the Millennium Development Goals. The goal of SCP is to meet needs and improve living standards while minimizing environmental impacts over the full life cycle of products and services. The target areas of Goal 12 include sustainable resource management, reducing food waste and plastic pollution, shifting to more sustainable business practices, and increasing awareness of sustainable lifestyles. Achieving SCP will create synergies and support other development goals related to food, water, energy and climate change
The document discusses climate smart agriculture practices. It defines climate smart agriculture as an approach that aims to sustainably increase productivity and incomes, adapt and build resilience to climate change, and reduce and/or remove greenhouse gas emissions. The document outlines various climate smart agricultural practices and approaches, including crop management practices, soil/water management, livestock/agroforestry management, and more. It also discusses challenges and the need for capacity building, knowledge sharing, financial support, and policy frameworks to promote widespread adoption of climate smart agriculture.
The document outlines the terms of reference for analyzing district agricultural development plans (DADPS) and providing recommendations on how to better address climate change adaptation, mitigation and REDD+ in relation to small-scale agriculture. Specifically, the consultant will:
1. Review DADPS from Kilosa and Chamwino districts to analyze how they currently address climate smart agriculture, climate change adaptation and mitigation, and REDD+.
2. Provide policy recommendations for how DADPS can be improved to better support small-scale farmers in climate change adaptation and adopting mitigation strategies.
3. Consider how DADPS address or conflict with other district policies and investments in achieving climate-resil
This document provides details about a project aimed at reducing poverty and greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of climate-resilient agricultural practices by small-scale farmers in Tanzania. The project is a partnership between 5 organizations and will pursue its goal through 4 interlinked strategies - community networking, policy research, demonstrating climate-smart agriculture approaches, and advocacy. It will work with farmers' groups and districts to integrate climate considerations into policies and budgets, support farmers with training and resources to adopt new practices, and influence decision-makers to better support small-scale farmers in mitigating and adapting to climate change.
Green Economy around the World; Advancement & Challenges in BangladeshAbdullahais16
The document discusses the concept of green economy, which focuses on economic growth while reducing environmental risks. It traces the evolution of green economy from the 1992 Earth Summit to recent initiatives by the UN and some countries. Several principles, components, and the differences between traditional and green economies are also introduced.
Towards a green economy in the Mediterranean. Assessment of National Green Ec...Luisa Nenci
Existing strategies that are publicly available and accessible and the opinions and perceptions of key Green Economy and Sustainability practitioners were the basis of the assessment. In a nutshell, the main outcome of the study is that the large majority of Mediterranean countries have out-dated or incomplete national GE/SD strategies. Often they are vague, not giving clear definitions or indicators. Only five countries (France, Italy, Morocco, Portugal and Tunisia) can claim to have good, up-to-date and detailed strategies with clear indicators, or – in the case of Italy – supporting legislation in place. Seven countries (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cyprus, Egypt, Slovenia and Spain) have outdated GE/SD strategies or none at all. The rest of the Mediterranean countries (Algeria, Croatia, Greece, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Montenegro, Palestine and Turkey) are somewhere in between these two groups of countries.
Similar to Green agricultural policies_2087_GRI_LSE-Agriculture-GGGI-policy_lores_51 (20)
Towards a green economy in the Mediterranean. Assessment of National Green Ec...
Green agricultural policies_2087_GRI_LSE-Agriculture-GGGI-policy_lores_51
1. Policy brief
January 2015
Green agricultural policies
and poverty reduction
Stefania Lovo, Mintewab Bezabih and Gregor Singer
2. The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and
the Environment was established in 2008 at the London
School of Economics and Political Science. The Institute
brings together international expertise on economics, as
well as finance, geography, the environment, international
development and political economy to establish a world-
leading centre for policy-relevant research, teaching and
training in climate change and the environment. It is
funded by the Grantham Foundation for the Protection
of the Environment, which also funds the Grantham
Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London.
It is also supported by the Global Green Growth Institute
through a grant for US$2.16 million (£1.35 million) to fund
several research project areas from 2012 to 2014. More
information about the Grantham Research Institute can
be found at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham/
Based in Seoul, Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI)
is an intergovernmental organisation founded to support
and promote a new model of economic growth known as
‘green growth’. The organisation partners with countries
to help them build economies that grow strongly and
are more efficient and sustainable in the use of natural
resources, less carbon intensive, socially inclusive and
more resilient to climate change. GGGI’s experts are
working with governments around the world, building their
capacity and working collaboratively on green growth
policies that can impact the lives of millions. More
information about the Global Green Growth Institute
can be found at: http://gggi.org/
3. | 1Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Contents
Contents
Executive summary 3
1. Introduction 4
2. Methodology 5
3. Green agricultural policies and their goals 6
4. Designing green agricultural policies and programmes 9
5. Implementing green agricultural policies and programmes 13
6. Conclusions and research gaps 15
Appendix 17
References 22
4. 2 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
The authors and acknowledgements
The authors
Mintewab Bezabih is a Research Officer at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change
and the Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Her main
research interests are adaptation to climate change in the agricultural sector, the performance
of rural land markets, biodiversity in relation to adaptation to climate change, land markets and
contracts, and gender issues.
Stefania Lovo joined the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
at the London School of Economics and Political Science as a Research Officer in October
2012. Before joining the Institute, Stefania was Econometrician at the Legatum Institute,
a London-based think tank. She has worked as a consultant for the World Bank and the
European Commission and collaborated with the Italian Development Cooperation in the
West Bank. She has worked extensively on the role of market imperfections in shaping the
behaviour of rural households. Her current research focuses mainly on environment-related
issues in developing countries. She has conducted research on the relationship between tenure
insecurity and conservation investment, deforestation and the impact of environmental policies
and firms’ choices on energy efficiency, competitiveness and firms’ location. Stefania holds
a PhD in Economics from the University of Sussex and a PhD in Economics and Finance from
the University of Verona.
Gregor Singer is a Research Assistant at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change
and the Environment at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is also a
consultant for the sustainable resource initiative at the Office of the Chief Economist of the
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Gregor holds a MSc in Environmental
Economics and Climate Change from the London School of Economics and Political Science.
He has also worked as a junior economist consultant at the Global Green Growth Institute.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Alina Averchenkova, Alex Bowen, Salvatore di Falco, Chris Duffy,
Kirk Hamilton, Sam Fankhauser and Dimitri Zenghelis for extremely helpful comments on an
earlier version of the paper. Financial support has come from the Global Green Growth Institute,
the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, as well as the UK Economic
and Social Research Council through the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and
Policy. The views expressed in this paper represent those of the authors and do not necessarily
represent those of the host institutions or funders.
5. | 3Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Executive summary
Executive summary
Developing countries typically have large agricultural sectors. As a result, green agricultural
policies are a key part of their shift to a low-carbon economy.
Green agricultural policies drive increased use of farming practices and technologies that
simultaneously:
• maintain and increase farm productivity and profitability while ensuring the provision of food
and other ecosystem services on a sustainable basis;
• reduce negative externalities such as soil erosion, inorganic agro-chemical pollution,
and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions; and
• rebuild or preserve ecological resources, such as soil fertility, forest, water, air and
biodiversity, including animal and plant genetic diversity.
To gain political support in developing countries, green agricultural policies must also reduce
poverty and deliver wider development objectives. However, this can be difficult to achieve.
This policy brief provides a practical guide to successfully designing and implementing green
agricultural policies based on the outcomes of more than 20 projects in 17 countries. The policies
explored include payments for environmental services, subsidies and unconditional incentives,
community-based natural resource management and training and extension services.
This policy brief highlights the importance of targeting policies at the poorest people and
making it easier for them to participate. It finds that local economic, social and cultural factors
should be an important consideration when choosing and implementing policies. In particular
policy-makers should consider:
• the availability of credit;
• property rights and land ownership arrangements;
• labour market conditions;
• the strength of local institutions and legal context; and
• social and cultural norms.
Implementation of green agricultural policies should be guided by two general rules:
• They should be complemented with policies or initiatives that tackle local market
imperfections, such as low availability of credit or limited off-farm opportunities. For example,
where deforestation is being tackled by payments for environmental services, which will
restrict on-farm labour, there may also need to be labour market policies that create
alternative off-farm jobs. This type of policy works best where good information is available
about local socio-economic and institutional conditions.
Executive summary
6. 4 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
1. Introduction
• They should allow participants in green agricultural initiatives to choose appropriate
interventions from a menu of options. This makes the best use of their knowledge and
enables them to best match the options to their individual circumstances. For example,
policies to conserve soil, which can fail to engage poor farmers with insecure land rights,
may be more palatable if participants can plant trees along plot boundaries in exchange
for carbon sequestration payments - a move that can also help them consolidate their rights
on the plot.
Smart and informed policy design can help to ensure that green agricultural policies do not
interfere with poverty reduction and exploit potential synergies. Indeed, the projects that were
analysed suggest that green agricultural policies can alleviate poverty if some important issues
relating to the design and implementation are properly addressed.
1. Introduction
Developing economies tend to have a large agricultural sector, so agricultural policies shape
the growth of the wider economy and directly affect most people. For example, agriculture
accounts for approximately 20 percent of India’s GDP and 50 percent of employment; in Kenya
it accounts for 30 percent of GDP and 60 percent of employment; and in Ethiopia it accounts
for 45 percent of GDP and 80 percent of employment (World Bank, 2012). Policy-makers in
these countries, and particularly developing countries in Africa (Diao, Hazell and Thurlow, 2010),
have to be mindful of the impact that achieving environmental objectives through green
agricultural policies has on socio-economic wellbeing. For green agricultural policies to
succeed they will have to both protect the environment and reduce poverty.1
The greening of agriculture, as defined in the Green Economy Report (UNEP 2011), refers to
farming practices and technologies that simultaneously:
• maintain and increase farm productivity and profitability while ensuring the provision of food
and other ecosystem services on a sustainable basis;
• reduce negative externalities, such as soil erosion, inorganic agro-chemical pollution,
and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions; and
• rebuild or preserve ecological resources, such as soil fertility, forest, water, air and biodiversity
including animal and plant genetic diversity.
There is a broad range of carbon abatement opportunities in agriculture (Smith et al., 2008),
but the sector still plays a marginal role in international efforts to reduce carbon emissions
(for example, via certified or voluntary emission reductions in carbon offset markets).
Partly, this is because green agricultural policies can conflict with the fundamentals of poverty-
reducing growth in developing countries, such as high labour intensity, migration, urbanisation
and shifting economic activity away from agriculture towards manufacturing and other sectors.
(e.g. Dercon, 2012). In some circumstances they can even increase poverty, for example if the
fiscal burden of the policies is not distributed fairly or if policies lead to job losses that the local
1 The agricultural sector accounts for 14 percent of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, which rises
to 30 percent if carbon emissions and sequestration from upstream (fertilisers, deforestation, etc.) and
downstream sources (bio-energies, etc.) are taken into account.
7. | 5Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
2. Methodology
labour market cannot absorb in other areas. Whether or not green agricultural policies conflict
with poverty reduction largely depends on the context and the policy instrument(s) chosen.
However, with smart design, conflicts can usually be overcome.
This policy brief provides a practical guide to successfully designing and implementing green
agricultural policies based on the outcomes of more than 20 projects in 17 countries (details of
all the projects that have been analysed can be found in the appendix). It shows that greening
agriculture and poverty reduction can go hand-in-hand, but it also highlights instances where
green agricultural policies have increased poverty. These examples provide important lessons
for future policy design and underline the inevitability of trade-offs. The findings also highlight
the importance of context in shaping policy instruments and how they are implemented.
They also illustrate that a mix of policy instruments can deliver growth, emissions reduction
and poverty alleviation.
Section 2 provides an overview of the methodology for the analysis and section 3 describes
green agricultural policies and provides more information about the environmental goals they
deliver. Section 4 explores how green agricultural programmes can be designed to meet dual
environmental and poverty reduction goals and section 5 addresses issues and opportunities
associated with implementation.
This policy brief draws on a systematic review of the current evidence of the impact of green
agricultural policies on poverty by Lovo, Bezabih and Singer (2014).
2. Methodology
The findings described in this brief are based on a review of the latest relevant literature.
However, despite wide coverage and the recent nature of the evaluations, this literature varies in
focus, breadth and depth so that a uniform analytical methodology could not be drawn from it.
As a result, this review focuses on qualitative analysis of the results of the individual papers.
While great effort was devoted to selecting studies that show rigorous empirical foundations,
this policy brief is also based on descriptive analysis of poverty reduction and environmental
conservation measures. In-depth empirical evaluations are sparse and some effects, especially
relating to landless individuals and broader spill-over effects on non-participants, have not been
properly analysed. Rigorous empirical research is needed to expand knowledge of the impact
of green policies on non-environmental outcomes and the local economy as a whole.
More details about all of the green agricultural programmes used in this analysis can be found in
the appendix.
8. 6 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
3. Green agricultural policies and their goals
3. Green agricultural policies and their goals
3.1 Key green agricultural policies
Green agricultural policies include payments for environmental services, unconditional
incentives, community-based natural resource management, and training and extension
services. A detailed description of each policy can be found in the following paragraphs.
Green agricultural programmes often use a combination of these polices.
Payments for environmental services
This approach uses conditional payments for environmental services. The key elements are that
payment is conditional and participation is voluntary. Compliance is often monitored by buyers,
who can stop paying for environmental services if outcomes are unsatisfactory. Sometimes,
payments for environmental services involve explicit contracts between consumers and
suppliers. Payments for environmental services can be area-based (targeting a specific
vulnerable zone) or product-based (targeting specific more sustainable products such as those
that guarantee biodiversity conservation (Wunder, 2005)).
Unconditional incentives
Unconditional incentives, as the name suggests, do not impose conditions about payments for
environmental services contracts. They often take the form of direct subsidies, tax exemptions
or subsidised credit. Subsidies can include both cash and in-kind payments. These instruments
have been extensively used to promote technology adoption and enhance land productivity (for
example, Malawi’s Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme (AISP)) and more recently to promote
sustainable agriculture and preserve rural ecosystems.
Community-based natural resource management
This strategy involves communities becoming responsible for managing natural resources.
Recently, it has been recognised that organised civil society can help to internalise externalities
and provide natural resources. Participatory resource management can reduce information
asymmetries, incentive incompatibility, lack of effective monitoring and maintenance (Adhikari,
2005). The natural resources in question include forests, open woodland or grasslands for
livestock grazing, wood supply, medicines and famine foods; farm land for gleaning, grazing
after harvest, and crop residues; wildlife for game meat and safari incomes; fish in fresh water
lakes; and aquifers, tanks, and irrigation channels for domestic and livestock water supply and
irrigation (Adams et al., 2004).
Training and extension services
Training programmes educate farmers to adopt sustainable strategies, make better-informed
choices and reduce the impact of agriculture on the environment, usually through community-
level courses or targeted extension services.2
In most cases, sustainable strategies are taught
together with other useful practices. In the widespread farmer field school (in place in
78 countries) farmers are helped to develop more general skills, such as analytical skills,
critical thinking, and creativity, and learn to make better decisions (Davis et al., 2012).
2 ‘Extension services’ describes a range of support activities that are designed to help farmers improve
decision-making and provide them with information on the most recent developments in agricultural inputs,
farming techniques and local prices.
9. | 7Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
3. Green agricultural policies and their goals
3.2 Types of environmental goals set for green agricultural policies
Green agricultural policies aim to deliver at least one of the following environmental goals:
carbon sequestration and storage, watershed management, biodiversity conservation and
pollution control.
Carbon sequestration and storage
There are three main ways to use agriculture to remove carbon and store it in soil or biomass:
Afforestation and reforestation
Afforestation and reforestation policies establish forest in areas of non-forest land or
restock existing forests or woodlands. These encompass REDD (Reducing emissions
from deforestation and degradation) programmes.
Minimum or zero tillage
Minimum or zero tillage initiatives improve soil conservation by encouraging farmers to
till the soil less intensively, not completely inverting it or leaving part of the soil surface
covered with crop residues or plant residue. This helps recapture lost carbon from
agricultural soils, conserve moisture and reduce water and wind erosion.
Soil conservation
Soil conservation encompasses various forms of contour farming aimed at slowing down
runoffs and creating detention storage. Contour farming can be achieved by aligning
plant rows and tillage lines at right angles, by creating earth or stone bunds, or by
planting trees and grass.
Watershed management
Watershed management aims to guarantee that watershed resources are distributed
sustainably and enhance watershed functions that can affect plants, animals, and human
communities. These are particularly important in semi-arid tropics, where the capacity of
watersheds to capture water during rainy periods is extremely important for its subsequent use
in dry periods. Improving water-holding capacity must be done sustainably by protecting the
upper reaches against erosion and so requires measures to conserve soil and reduce grazing
and firewood collection in the surrounding areas.
Biodiversity conservation
Biodiversity conservation policies aim to conserve the biological diversity among living
organisms and the ecological complexes of which they are part through multi-crop planting
or tree and bush planting.
Pollution control
Pollution control policies mainly aim to reduce agricultural by-products that contaminate
or degrade the environment and surrounding ecosystem. In many developing countries,
governments have promoted the use of pesticides to expand agricultural output per acre
and their use has accelerated in the last three decades. Most policies in this area promote
sustainable farming practices that prescribe the correct use of pesticides, fertilizers and other
agrochemicals or the use of natural parasites and predators to control pest populations.
10. 8 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
3. Green agricultural policies and their goals
The choice of policy, or package of policies, is likely to depend on the ability to simultaneously
deliver environmental objectives and reduce poverty. Such policies are often described as
‘pro-poor’.
How green agricultural policies and programmes are designed and implemented is likely to
affect the extent to which they are pro-poor. An overview of the issues and challenges that must
be met to achieve pro-poor green agricultural programmes is contained in Figure 1 and
described in detail in sections 4 and 5.
Figure 1. Overview of the key factors for the effectiveness of green agricultural
policies in reducing poverty
Challenges Key issues Example of projects
Spatial income distribution
Land rights
Small land size
Choice of environmental services
Financial contraints
Institutional constraints
Green
agricultural
policies
Implementation
Design
Targeting and
participation
Choice of
instruments
Timing
Engagement
and promotion
Capacity
building
Financial
sustainability
7: WfW, South Africa
10: PSA Costa Rica
12: PES in Indonesia
15: PROFAFOR in Ecuador
2: Scolel’Te in Mexico
1: N’hambita, Mozambique
11: Silvopastoral
in Nicaragua
17: Sloping lands conversion,
China
Leasehold and rights
Credit constraints
Skills
Risk and uncertainty
Labour market constraints
Non-agricultural incentives
19: Community forestry,
Nepal
4: PES western Uganda
15: PROFAFOR
8: Los Negros PES
14: Bolsa Foresta
Marketing
Piloting
Collective gains and losses
24: Integrated Pest
Management, Bangladesh
Seasonality
Time horizon
18: Soil and water conservation
subsidies, Western India
Rule of law
Enforcement
Elite capture
17: SLCP, India
20: CAMPFIRE, Zimbabwe
9: Watershed Development,
Maharashtra, India
Transaction costs
Funding
Youth involvement
Drop-outs
1: Nhambita Community
Carbon Project,
Mozambique
5: Hydrological Environmental
Services, Mexcio
3: PES in the ACCVC,
Costa Rica
11. | 9Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
4. Designing green agricultural policies and programmes
4. Designing green agricultural policies
and programmes
The literature shows that smart design is important to help green agricultural policies and
programmes meet dual environmental and poverty reduction goals, with three issues
particularly important: how policies are targeted, which policies or combination of policy
instruments are used and the timing of policy delivery.
4.1 Targeting and participation
Meeting both environmental and socio-economic objectives through green agricultural policies
and programmes is challenging.
Pagiola and Platais (2007) argue that for green agricultural policies to work best, they should
target areas or communities with the highest potential to produce environmental services.
However, these might not be the areas where poor people are located so policies will fail to cut
poverty. To benefit the environment and cut poverty at the same time, policies must be targeted
at the poorest people and it must be made easier for them to participate in green agricultural
programmes. The best example is the South African Working for Water Programme (Project 7)
that explicitly targeted the poorest and most vulnerable people. The programme employed
about 24,000 previously jobless people (Turpie et al., 2008) at the same time as delivering
environmental benefits.
A number of factors are important in ensuring green agricultural policies are targeted effectively.
Spatial income distribution
Poverty is usually greater in areas of high environmental degradation, so it may seem that by
targeting these areas with policies such as payments for environmental services, both
environmental and poverty reduction aims will be met. However, the income distribution in these
areas can be surprisingly varied (Pagiola et al., 2005) and careful targeting is required to ensure
that policies benefit those most in need.
Land rights
Land rights are a common enrolment requirement for green agricultural programmes
because they give assurances about the legitimacy of local landownership arrangements.
However, many small farmers, who are often the poorest, do not hold formal land titles.
Land rights are not necessary for policies to be effective if green agriculture schemes adapt
to local agreements about land-ownership arrangements and use these as the basis for
participation.
The payments for environmental services programme in Costa Rica (Project 10), for example,
abandoned formal land title as a requirement for participation and greatly improved the number
of poor people taking part in the programme (Pagiola, 2008). In Indonesia (Project 12),
a payment for environmental services programme may even have strengthened previously
weak property rights and given local communities a stronger negotiation position against
logging companies (Engel and Palmer, 2008).
12. 10 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
4. Designing green agricultural policies and programmes
Small land size
Most green agriculture policy instruments, and especially payments for environmental services,
cost more per hectare for farmers with smaller land areas. As a result, some programmes explicitly
target large landowners to reduce transaction costs. For example, the PROFAFOR project in
Ecuador (Project 15) demands a minimum contract size of 50 hectares (Wunder and Alban, 2008).
One way to overcome high transaction costs is to enable groups of individual farmers with small
plots of land to come together under green policy programmes. For example, the Scolel’Te
project in Mexico (Project 2) allowed farmers to participate either individually or as part of a
community, encouraging households with smaller land holdings to take part. Jindal et al. (2008)
find that contracting with groups can reduce the prohibitively high transaction costs associated
with small-scale projects in environmental services schemes in Africa.
However, community-based contracts face the challenge of ensuring the benefits are fairly
distributed, which requires a fair distribution of power in the community (Corbera et al., 2007).
Ostrom (1990) points out that, if this is not the case, then, to achieve a fair and sustainable
solution, all stakeholders must be meaningfully involved and customary rights must be
recognised and compensated accordingly.
For some green policy initiatives, such as integrated pest management, broad coverage is
essential to their success, so providing the flexibility for both groups and individuals to take part
is very important (Dasgupta et al., 2007).
Choice of environmental services
Offering a menu of environmental services can help to reach poorer households by allowing
them to choose the service best suited to their circumstances. The N’hambita Community
Carbon Project (Project 1), for example, allows participants to choose from agroforestry systems
such as tree planting, orchards or intercropping. Similarly, the Silvopastoral Ecosystem
Management Project in Nicaragua (Project 11) is likely to have had more poor people taking part
because they could chose the most cost-effective option from a range of schemes, such as
cheap land use changes or more costly fodder banks (Pagiola et al., 2008). However, this might
increase transaction costs due to increased monitoring and supervision (Jindal et al., 2012).
Financial constraints
Up-front subsidies can encourage a greater number of poorer households to take part.
Such subsidies can be expensive, although this can be addressed by targeting them only at
constrained households. None of the projects considered here have tried such an approach.
Designing subsidies based on participants’ characteristics requires investigation and might be
complex and costly. Groom et al. (2010) identify land endowments, education level, household
structure, and the institutional environment of recipient households as useful indicators to help
identify and target constrained households. The Sloping Lands Conservation Programme in
China (Project 17) provides two levels of subsidies, based on regional characteristics, to try
to match the needs of different participants. Relating subsidies to specific household
characteristics as well could substantially improve the programme’s efficiency.
Institutional constraints
Accompanying agricultural policies and programmes with policies that can remove institutional
barriers, such as poorly defined property rights or low availability of credit, can help poor people
to take part (Groom et al., 2010) without interfering with environmental objectives.
13. | 11Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
4. Designing green agricultural policies and programmes
4.2 Choice of instruments
To cut poverty and improve the environment, green agricultural policies and programmes
must be sensitive to local economic, social and cultural factors. This often requires
complementary non-agricultural policies that solve wider problems, such as limited access
to credit and non-farm jobs.
Leasehold and rights
A lack of formal land rights can stop poor households taking part in green agricultural
programmes. One way to overcome this is to facilitate the provision of leasehold or private
property rights as part of the design and implementation of programmes, as was successfully
done in the community forestry programme in Nepal (Project 19) (Adhikari, 2005).
Introducing land rights as part of the design of green agricultural programmes could also
challenge local and project-based power relations and hence transform the socio-economic
status of small farmers and poor households (Corbera et al., 2007). However, the extent to
which this happens in practice depends on power relations within the community. Established
networks of power and influence generally govern the equity of the outcome, and social and
cultural factors, such as the status of women, are likely to have an influence.
Credit constraints
Liquidity-constrained households are less likely to participate in environmental programmes
because the way they provide finance, for example monthly payments of a consistent amount
in arrears, fails to match their financial needs. Analysing a payment for environmental services
programme in western Uganda (Project 4), for example, Jayachandran (2013) indicates that,
while a steady stream of regular payments suits participants who are used to receiving regular
incomes from forest products, it is not appropriate when participants need to sell larger
amounts of forest products to cover emergency costs or make large investments.
Complementing conditional payments in arrears (i.e. as part of a ‘payments for environmental
services’ programme) with better access to credit would help to involve more liquidity-
constrained households. Alternatively, cash-strapped households could be offered some
upfront payments so that they have reserves available in case of emergency.
Skills
Green agricultural programmes should be accompanied by training schemes and provide
technical assistance to improve skills and earning capacity for those taking part. For instance,
the Pimampiro payment for ecosystem services project (Project 6) and PROFAFOR (Project 15)
schemes have been relatively successful in reaching their environmental objectives and improving
recipients’ welfare by offering training in forest management (Wunder and Alban, 2008).
A programme in Los Negros, Bolivia (Project 8), offered a package of beehives and apicultural
training because many participants had no experience of beekeeping (Asquith et al., 2008).
Such training can help poor households to retain the full benefits of sustainable practices.
Risk and uncertainty
Because risk and uncertainty are also major barriers to adopting improved agricultural
practices, payments could be combined with other group schemes, such as insurance,
to help farmers share risk (Graff-Zivin and Lipper, 2008). This can stimulate agricultural
development and cut poverty. However, none of the projects considered here provide
insurance schemes for participants.
14. 12 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
4. Designing green agricultural policies and programmes
Labour market constraints
Finally, implementing labour-saving green measures, common in afforestation projects, might
require separate interventions, such as job and skills training or migration incentives, to make it
easier for people to obtain jobs elsewhere and to switch permanently to off-farm activities
(Groom et al., 2010).
Non-agricultural incentives
Green policies can combine various incentives and conditions that could help reduce poverty.
The Bolsa Floresta in Brazil (Project 14) rewards families’ commitment to stop deforestation by
paying those that enrol their children in school, sign a zero deforestation commitment and
attend a two-day training programme on environmental awareness.
4.3 Timing
The timing of policy implementation and of payments, subsidies and training courses is crucial
for the success of any pro-poor programme since poor farmers are more likely to be labour-
and/or capital-constrained. The timing of a training course, for example, is among the most
important conditions for its success (Feder et al., 2004).
Seasonality
Subsistence agriculture offers few income opportunities and poor farmers often have to seek
off-farm work during the dry season. As Smith et al. (1998) suggest, based on projects across
western India (Project 18), this spare labour capacity makes the dry season the opportune time
for conservation work. Failing to provide farmers with the right incentives at this time of the year
will prevent them from participating. In addition, courses should be synchronised with farmers’
seasonal needs to ensure they receive useful information (for example, about traditional seed
varieties in time for the planting season). Seasonal needs vary across countries but also across
agro-climatic zones within a country or region. Therefore these needs should be investigated
before the programme is implemented.
Time horizon
Pagiola and Platais (2007) argue that ‘payments for environmental services’ programmes should
generally be on-going rather than finite unless the new recommended practices will happen
anyway because they are more profitable than current practices.
15. | 13Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
5. Implementing green agricultural policies and programmes
5. Implementing green agricultural policies
and programmes
Engaging with the communities affected by green agricultural policies and programmes is
particularly important, as is building the capacity of local institutions to oversee projects and
ensuring long-term financial sustainability.
5.1 Engagement and promotion
Engagement is a key part of scaling-up green agricultural programmes over time. The challenge
is to involve more poor households and stop them dropping out.
Marketing
Poor households often lack access to resources and information, so extra effort is needed to
get and keep them involved in green agricultural programmes. Sometimes programme designs
do not take into account socio-cultural and economic agro-ecological settings, and participants
are not properly consulted. Participatory approaches are likely to lead to better and more
sustainable implementation (Axin 1988; Braun, Thiele, and Fernandez, 2000).
Piloting
Some schemes, like ‘payments for environmental services’, are likely to be more successful if
a pilot is run prior to full implementation. Running a pilot allows programme administrators to
understand how contractual arrangements will work and to identify any unforeseen impacts.
It also gives participants insights into how they will be affected. Pilot studies should follow the
guidelines for policy analysis (for example, by randomising participation) to obtain a correct
preliminary assessment of the project.
Collective gains and losses
Strategies to encourage participation should emphasise the collective gains (or losses) from
adopting (or not adopting) particular sustainable practices (Dasgupta et al., 2007) to promote
co-operation among farmers and introduce some degree of moral pressure. An Integrated
Pest Management programme in Bangladesh (Project 24) shows that while it brings substantial
health and ecological benefits, if neighbours continue to rely on chemical pesticides, they will
also kill helpful parasites and predators, and expose adopting farmers and local ecosystems to
chemical spillovers from adjoining fields.
5.2 Capacity building
Many developing countries have weak institutions, both structurally and technically. Rule of law,
enforcement and the prevention of elite capture are important in these settings. Designers of
green agricultural polices and programmes also need to take into account capacity limitations.
Rule of law
Establishing a sound legal framework that secures contractual agreements and ensures the
collection of payments or fees is crucial to involve more people and to distribute the benefits
fairly, particularly amongst the poorest and least influential members of the society. Programmes
might benefit only the wealthy and powerful, even when they are specifically targeted at poor
and marginalised people, due to lack of legal knowledge and weak implementation (Deininger
et al., 2008).
16. 14 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
5. Implementing green agricultural policies and programmes
Enforcement
Alongside a sound legal framework, there must be appropriate enforcement otherwise the
benefits of a programme are unlikely to be fairly spread. For example, Zheng et al. (2011)
observe that participants in the Chinese Sloping Lands Conservation Programme (Project 17)
were not fully paid, which reduced the number of subsequent land conversions. Similarly, in the
Campfire initiative in Zimbabwe (Project 20), district authorities retained benefits that should
have been passed on to local communities.
Elite capture
Capacity-building for community organisations and governments can also help reduce the
scope for elite capture at the expense of the poor, particularly when land rights are insecure or
informal and customary rules exclude certain members of the society from accessing economic
opportunities. The Watershed Development project (Project 9), which sought to prevent soil
erosion in Maharashtra, India, initially negatively impacted women because it limited the use of
the communal lands from which they derived much of their livelihoods. Ensuring that women
were represented in the organisations overseeing the project was crucial to achieve both
environmental and poverty alleviation objectives (Kerr, 2002).
5.3 Financial sustainability
Financial sustainability is important for successful green agricultural programmes. It should be
assessed before implementation and there should be an ongoing evaluation of transaction
costs, stability of funding and dropout rate.
Transaction costs
Transaction costs in green agricultural policies and programmes emerge when they are set up
(design or negotiation costs) and implemented (administration, monitoring or sanctioning costs).
Reducing transaction costs is a major challenge for most programmes given the risks
associated with under-spending for important activities such as monitoring (Wunder et al.,
2008). The level of transaction costs depends highly on how effectively programmes are
targeted. Reaching individual farmers is likely to be costly, reducing the already-low returns to
soil conservation. High transaction costs prevent poorer farmers with less land taking part in
green agricultural programmes, as shown in Nicaragua (Project 11, Pagiola et al., 2008) and
Colombia (Project 13, Rios and Pagiola, 2010) where small farmers are excluded.
Group-based schemes may be more effective in limiting costs (Jindal et al., 2012). As proposed
in the N’hambita Community Carbon Project (Project 1), combining carbon sequestration for
individual plots with payments for community forests helps reduce transaction costs relative to
overall project benefits. Wunder et al. (2008) find that green interventions tend to be more effective
and efficient when they are user-financed, for example when downstream water users pay for
upstream watershed services, (such as the Pampiro (Project 6), Los Negros (Project 8) and
PROFAFOR (Project 15) programmes) instead of governments (such as the SLCP (Project 17)
and CAMPFIRE (Project 20)). User-financed projects tend to be more closely tailored to local
conditions and needs, have better monitoring and demonstrate greater willingness to enforce
conditionality.
17. | 15Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
6. Conclusions and research gaps
Stability of funding
Swallow and Goddard (2013) emphasise the importance of stable and sustained funding for
programmes to be successful. This is not always guaranteed, especially if the programme is
connected to carbon offset markets.
In the case of watershed management projects, funding is likely to be more stable if those
delivering the project, usually farmers, receive the payments directly from those who benefit
(i.e. water consumers). This was done successfully in the Payment for Hydrological
Environmental Services project in Mexico (Project 5) where farmers were paid via a levy on
consumer water fees.
Youth involvement
Involving children and young people in programmes can help their long-term durability
(Miranda et al., 2003). Today’s children will grow up to form the civil society of the future and
will eventually decide how resources should be managed. The Área de Conservación Cordillera
Volcánica Central (ACCVC) project in Costa Rica (Project 3) encourages forest protection by
providing environmental education and fairs for children in public areas and gardens, as well as
promoting sustainable agricultural methods.
Drops-outs
During the early stages of programme design the potential yield losses should be assessed,
in particular when proposed projects require farmers to commit to long-term contracts.
Any perceived welfare loss by the households is likely to result in them resisting or withdrawing
from the project (Hegde and Bull, 2011).
6. Conclusions and research gaps
Green agricultural policies can be designed in a way that minimises adverse poverty effects or
exploits synergies. In many developing countries, making green policies compatible with wider
development and growth objectives is essential for political support.
This policy brief discusses the key challenges of designing and implementing green agricultural
initiatives that cut poverty and benefit the environment, and makes recommendations to
address them. It highlights that it is essential to target policies at the poorest people and make
it easier for them to take part. It finds that local economic, social and cultural factors should be
an important consideration when choosing which policies to use and how to implement them.
In particular policy-makers should consider:
• the availability of credit;
• property rights and land ownership arrangements;
• labour market conditions;
• the strength of local institutions and legal context; and
• social and cultural norms.
18. 16 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
6. Conclusions and research gaps
Implementation of green agricultural policies should be guided by two general rules:
• Complement green agricultural policies with measures that tackle local market imperfections,
such as low availability of credit or limited off-farm opportunities. For example, where
deforestation is an issue it may be prudent to complement a ‘payment for environmental
services’ policy, which will restrict on-farm labour, with labour market policies that create
other non-farm jobs. This type of policy works best where there is good information about
local socio-economic and institutional conditions.
• Allow participants in green agricultural initiatives to choose appropriate interventions from
a menu of options. This makes the best use of their knowledge and enables them to best
match their individual circumstances. For example, soil-conservation policies, which can fail
to engage poor farmers who have insecure land rights, may succeed if participants can
choose to plant trees along plot boundaries, in exchange for carbon sequestration payments,
which can also help them consolidate their rights on the plot.
With smart and informed policy design, adverse impacts of green agricultural policies on efforts
to reduce poverty can be greatly reduced and potential synergies exploited. Indeed, the
analysed projects suggest that green agricultural policies can also reduce poverty, but only if
some design and implementation issues are properly addressed.
There is an urgent need to examine the sustainability and scalability of green agricultural
policies and programmes. For instance, ‘payment for environmental services’ schemes where
there is a willing buyer and a willing provider of environmental services, are likely to be more
sustainable, since there is no dependence on grant finance or subsidies beyond the set-up
stage. Similarly, in poverty-environment interventions where there are highly localised
implementation constraints, institutional failures and political economy issues, it can be
difficult to exploit the economies of scale of interventions.
19. | 17Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Appendix
Table A1: Projects and evaluations by goal and instrument
Policy, project
and evaluation
Main environmental goal/impact
Socio-
economic
impacts
Carbon
sequestration
Watershed
management
Biodiversity
conservation
Pollution
control
Payment for environmental services (PES)
1 N’hambita
Community Carbon
Project, Mozambique
1) Jindal et al. (2012)
2) Palmer and Silber
(2012)
3) Hegde and Bull
(2011)
Afforestation
and reduced
deforestation
– – – Positive but
small effect on
participating
households’
livelihood
through
additional
income
2 Scolel Te, Mexico
1) De Jong et al. (2007)
2) Soto-Pinto
et al. (2010)
3) Corbera et al. (2007)
Afforestation
and reduced
deforestation
– – – Communal
ownership led
to equitable
outcomes, but
only if power
distributed
equally within
community
3 PES in the The Área
de Conservación
Cordillera Volcánica
Central (ACCVC),
Costa Rica
Miranda et al. (2003)
Afforestation
and reduced
deforestation
Through
forestry
– – Limited impact
on poor people
as participants
were wealthy
4 PES in western
Uganda
1) Jayachandran (2013)
Afforestation
and reduced
deforestation
– Multiple tree
species
– Credit
constrained
households
less likely to
participate
5 Payment for
Hydrological
Environmental
Services, Mexico
1) Muñoz-Piña et al.
(2008)
2) Alix-Garcia et al.
(2010)
3) Garcia-Amado et al.
(2011)
– Through
forestry
– – Income of
poor people
increased,
except the
poorest
20. 18 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Appendix
Table A1: Projects and evaluations by goal and instrument
Policy, project
and evaluation
Main environmental goal/impact
Socio-
economic
impacts
Carbon
sequestration
Watershed
management
Biodiversity
conservation
Pollution
control
6 Pimampiro municipal
watershed-
protection scheme,
Ecuador
1) Wunder and Alban
(2008)
– Through
forestry
– – Higher
incomes, but
very small
landowners did
not participate
7 Working for Water
(WfW) programme,
South Africa
1) Turpie et al. (2008)
– Through
removal of
alien plants
– – Positive impacts
on income and
employment of
the poorest and
landless people
8 Los Negros PES
programme, Bolivia
1) Asquith et al. (2008)
– Through
forestry
No land-
clearing or
hunting
– More diversified
income from
beehives and
training
9 Watershed
Development in
Maharashtra, India
1) Kerr (2002)
– Through water
harvesting
structures
and soil
conservation
– – Positive impact
on landholders,
but landless
women suffered
from restrictions
on common
land
10 Pago por Servicios
Ambientales (PSA)
programme, Costa
Rica
1) Pagiola (2008)
2) Zbinden and Lee
(2005)
3) Arriagada et al.
(2009)
4) Pfaff et al. (2007)
Afforestation,
reduced
deforestation,
soil
conservation
Through
forestry
Forest
conservation
in biodiversity
priority areas
– Positive, since
poor live on
environmentally
targeted land
- abandoning
land titles
improved
participation of
poor people
11 Silvopastoral
Ecosystem
Management
Project, Nicaragua
1) Pagiola et al. (2007)
2) Pagiola et al. (2008)
Afforestation,
reduced
deforestation,
soil
conservation
– Vegetation
diversity
– Transaction
costs
disadvantaged
poor people,
as a smaller
land area was
contracted
21. | 19Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Appendix
Table A1: Projects and evaluations by goal and instrument
Policy, project
and evaluation
Main environmental goal/impact
Socio-
economic
impacts
Carbon
sequestration
Watershed
management
Biodiversity
conservation
Pollution
control
12 PES in Indonesia
1) Engel and Palmer
(2008)
Afforestation,
reduced
deforestation,
soil
conservation
– Vegetation
diversity
– Unknown
– PES may
have secured
property rights
by increasing
land value
13 Silvopastoral
Ecosystem
Management Project,
Colombia
1) Rios and Pagiola
(2010)
Afforestation,
reduced
deforestation,
soil
conservation
– Vegetation
diversity
– Positive income
effect due to
participation
of poor
people, but
disadvantaged
by transaction
costs
14 Bolsa Floresta
Program, Brasil
1) Lima (2011)
Afforestation,
reduced
deforestation,
soil
conservation
– Vegetation
diversity
– Increased
schooling due
to conditionality
of the
programme
Unconditional incentives
15 PROFAFOR,
Ecuador
1) Wunder and Alban
(2008)
Afforestation – – – Higher
incomes,
but very small
landowners
could not
participate
16 Programa
Agricultura de Baixo
Carbono (ABC),
Brazil
1) IPAM (2004)
Afforestation,
no-tillage, soil
conservation,
NO2
-free
fertilizers
– – – Unknown –
institutional
barriers to
participation
22. 20 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Appendix
Table A1: Projects and evaluations by goal and instrument
Policy, project
and evaluation
Main environmental goal/impact
Socio-
economic
impacts
Carbon
sequestration
Watershed
management
Biodiversity
conservation
Pollution
control
17 Sloping lands
conversion
programme, China
(Also PES)
1) Groom and Palmer
(2012)
2) Xu et al. (2004)
3) Uchida et al. (2007)
4) Uchida et al. (2009)
5) Groom et al. (2010)
6) Zheng et al. (2011)
– Through
afforestation
and soil
conservation
– – Targeted area
populated
by poorer
household
increased
participation
by poor people
– significant
and beneficial
increase
in off-farm
employment,
but constraints
on migration
18 Soil and water
conservation
subsidies, western
India
1) Smith et al. (1998)
Soil
conservation
Afforestation,
irrigation
systems
– – Positive impact,
but may have
increased
dependency
on government
– poor
environmental
outcomes
Community based natural resource management
19 Community forestry,
Nepal
1) Adhikari (2005)
Community-
based
management
may have
disadvantaged
poor people as
relatively more
dependent on
resource
20 CAMPFIRE wildlife
programme,
Zimbabwe
1) Frost and Bond
(2008)
– – Conservation
of wildlife
– Moderate
impacts
but district
authorities
retained
resource
benefits from
local authorities,
disadvantaging
poor people
23. | 21Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
Appendix
Table A1: Projects and evaluations by goal and instrument
Policy, project
and evaluation
Main environmental goal/impact
Socio-
economic
impacts
Carbon
sequestration
Watershed
management
Biodiversity
conservation
Pollution
control
21 Noel Kempff
Mercado Climate
Action Project,
Bolivia
1) Robertson and
Wunder (2005)
2) Asquith et al. (2002)
Afforestation
and reduced
deforestation
– Vegetation
diversity
– Positive
impact on
livelihoods, but
disrespecting
communal
law may have
disadvantaged
less powerful
members
22 Community seed
banking, Ethiopia
1) Bezabih (2008)
– – Crop
biodiversity
– Significant
productivity
increase,
but less for
households
headed by
women
Training and extension services
23 Farmer field schools,
Various countries
1) Van den Berg and
Jiggins (2007) (Asia)
2) Feder et al. (2004)
(Indonesia)
3) Davis et al. (2012)
(East Africa)
– – – Ecological
pest
management
Poverty
reduction due
to productivity
increases
24 Integrated Pest
Management,
Bangladesh
1) Dasgupta et al.
(2007)
– – – Ecological
pest
management
Mixed evidence.
Poverty
alleviation
due to cost
reductions, but
depended on
spillover effects
24. 22 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
References
References
Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B., and Wolmer,
W., 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306(5699), pp.1146–1149.
Adhikari, B., 2005. Poverty, property rights and collective action: under- standing the distributive aspects of
common property resource management. Environment and Development Economics, 10(1), pp.7–31.
Alix-Garcia, J. M. and Shapiro, E., 2010. The environmental effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services
in Mexico: preliminary lessons for REDD. University of Wisconsin. [pdf] Available at: http://www.aae.wisc.edu/
events/papers/devecon/2010/alix-garcia.05.06.pdf
Arriagada, R. A., Sills, E. O., Pattanayak, S. K., and Ferraro, P. J., 2009. Combining qualitative and quantitative
methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s program of payments for environmental services. Journal of
Sustainable Forestry, 28(3-5), pp.343–367.
Asquith, N. M., R´ıos, M. T. V., and Smith, J., 2002. Can forest-protection carbon projects improve rural
livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project, Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation
Strategies for Global Change, 7(4), pp.323–337.
Asquith, N. M., Vargas, M. T., and Wunder, S., 2008. Selling two environmental services: In-kind payments for
bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.675 – 684.
Axinn, G. H., 1988. Guide on alternative extension approaches. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations.
Bezabih, M., 2008. Agrobiodiversity conservation under an imperfect seed system: the role of Community
Seed Banking schemes. Agricultural Economics, 38(1), pp.77–87.
Braun, A. R., Thiele, G., Fernandez, M., 2000. Farmer field schools and local agricultural research committees:
complementary platforms for integrated decision-making in sustainable agriculture. AgREN Network Paper
(105). London: ODI.
Corbera, E., Brown, K., and Adger, W. N., 2007. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services.
Development and change, 38(4), pp.587– 613.
Dasgupta, S., Meisner, C., and Wheeler, D., 2007. Is environmentally friendly agriculture less profitable for
farmers? Evidence on integrated pest management in Bangladesh. Applied Economic Perspectives and
Policy, 29(1), pp.103–118.
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., and Nkuba, J., 2012. Impact of Farmer
Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa. World Development, 40(2), pp.402– 413.
De Jong, B., Bazan, E. E., and Montalvo, S. Q., 2007. Application of the “Climafor” baseline to determine
leakage: the case of Scolel T´e. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(6), pp.1153–1168.
Dercon, S., 2012. Is green growth good for the poor? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6231).
[online] Available at: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-6231
Diao, X., Hazell, P., and Thurlow, J., 2010. The role of agriculture in African development. World Development,
38(10), pp.1375–1383.
Deininger, K., D.A. Ali, and T. Yamano. 2008. Legal Knowledge and Economic Development: The Case of
Land Rights in Uganda. Land Economics 84(4), pp.593–619.
Engel, S. and Palmer, C., 2008. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak
property rights: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.799–809.
Feder, G., Murgai, R., and Quizon, J. B., 2004. Sending farmers back to school: The impact of farmer field
schools in Indonesia. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26(1), pp.45–62.
Frost, P. G. and Bond, I., 2008. The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: Payments for wildlife services.
Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.776 – 787.
Garc´ıa-Amado, L. R., P´erez, M. R., Escutia, F. R., Garc´ıa, S. B., and Mej´ıa, E. C., 2011. Efficiency of Payments
for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas,
Mexico. Ecological Economics, 70(12), pp.2361–2368.
25. | 23Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
References
Graff Zivin, J. and Lipper, L., 2008. Poverty, risk, and the adoption of soil carbon sequestration. Environment
and Development Economics, 13, pp.353– 373.
Groom, B., Grosjean, P., Kontoleon, A., Swanson, T., and Zhang, S., 2010. Relaxing rural constraints: a
‘win-win’policy for poverty and environment in China? Oxford Economic Papers, 62(1), pp.132–156.
Groom, B. and Palmer, C., 2012. REDD+ and rural livelihoods. Biological Conservation, 154(0), pp.42 – 52.
Hegde, R. and Bull, G. Q., 2011. Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Environmental-Services
project in Mozambique: A house- hold level analysis. Ecological Economics, 71(0), pp.122 – 130.
IPAM, 2004. Brazil’s “low-carbon agriculture” program: Barriers to implementation. Amazon Environmental
Research Institute. [pdf] Available at: http://www.gcftaskforce.org/documents/brazil’s_low-carbon_
agriculture_program.pdf
Jayachandran, S., 2013. Liquidity Constraints and Deforestation: The Limitations of Payments for Ecosystem
Services. American Economic Review, 103(3), pp.309–13.
Jindal, R., Kerr, J. M., and Carter, S., 2012. Reducing Poverty Through Carbon Forestry? Impacts of the
N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Development, 40(10), pp.2123 – 2135.
Jindal, R., Swallow, B., and Kerr, J., 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential
benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum, 32(2), pp.116–130.
Kerr, J., 2002. Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India. World
Development, 30(8), pp.1387 – 1400.
Lima, P., 2011. Payments for Environmental Services through the Local Lens: Preliminary evidences from the
Bolsa Floresta Program in the Brazilian Amazon. University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. [pdf] Available
at: http://www.ipef.br/servicos/teses/arquivos/lima,pgb.pdf
Lovo, S., Bezabih, M. and Singer, G., 2014. Green agricultural policies and poverty alleviation. Unpublished
manuscript. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate
Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Miranda, M., Porras, I. T., and Moreno, M. L., 2003. The social impacts of payments for environmental
services in Costa Rica: a quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed. London: International
Institute for Environment and Development. [pdf] Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/9245IIED.pdf
Moser, C. M. and Barrett, C. B., 2003. The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low
external-input technology: the case of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), pp.1085–1100.
Moser, C. M. and Barrett, C. B., 2006. The complex dynamics of small-holder technology adoption: The case
of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Economics, 35(3), pp.373–388.
Mullan, K. and Kontoleon, A., 2009. Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Services programmes in
developing countries: The Chinese Sloping Land Conversion Programme. Environmental Economy and Policy
Research Working Papers.
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J. M., and Braña, J., 2008. Paying for the hydrological services of
Mexico’s forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological economics, 65(4), pp.725–736.
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge
University Press.
Pagiola, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.712–724.
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G., 2005. Can payments for environ- mental services help reduce
poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World development, 33(2),
pp.237–253.
Pagiola, S. and Platais, G., 2007. Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice. Washington:
World Bank.
Pagiola, S., Rios, A. R., and Arcenas, A., 2008. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental
services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua. Environment and Development Economics,
13(3), pp.299.
Palmer, C. and Silber, T., 2012. Trade-offs between carbon sequestration and rural incomes in the N’hambita
Community Carbon Project, Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 29(1), pp.83 – 93.
26. 24 | Green agricultural policies and poverty reduction
References
Pfaff, A., Kerr, S., Lipper, L., Cavatassi, R., Davis, B., Hendy, J., and S´anchez-Azofeifa, G. A., 2007. Will buying
tropical forest carbon benefit the poor? Evidence from Costa Rica. Land Use Policy, 24(3), pp.600–610.
REECS, 2003. Developing pro-poor markets for environmental services in the Philippines. London, UK:
International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
Rios, A. and Pagiola, S., 2010. Poor household participation in payments for environmental services in
Nicaragua and Colombia. In Tacconi, L., Mohanty, S., and Suich, H., eds. Payments for Environmental
Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change. Edward Elgar. pp. 21–243.
Robertson, N. and Wunder, S., 2005. Fresh tracks in the forest: assessing incipient payments for
environmental services initiatives in Bolivia. Center for International Forestry Research, CIFOR.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O’Mara, F., Rice, C.,
et al., 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 363(1492), pp.789–813.
Smith, P., Parry, A., and Mishra, R., 1998. The use of Subsidies for Soil and Water Conservation: A case
study from Western India. in Farrington et al., eds. Participatory watershed development: challenges for the
21 Century. New Delhi and Oxford: OUP. pp. 281–298.
Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Ferrer, G. J., and de Jong, B., 2010. Carbon sequestration through
agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforestry Systems, 78(1), pp.39–51.
Swallow, B. M. and Goddard, T. W., 2013. Value chains for bio-carbon sequestration services: Lessons from
contrasting cases in Canada, Kenya and Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 31(0), pp.81 – 89.
Turpie, J., Marais, C., and Blignaut, J., 2008. The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for
ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa.
Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.788 – 798.
Uchida, E., Rozelle, S., and Xu, J., 2009. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off-Farm Labor:
Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on Rural Households in China. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, 91(1), pp.70–86.
Uchida, E., Xu, J., Xu, Z., and Rozelle, S., 2007. Are the poor benefiting from China’s land conservation
program? Environment and Development Economics, 12(04), pp.593–620.
UNEP, 2011. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. [pdf]
Available at: http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/ger_final_dec_2011/Green%20
EconomyReport_Final_Dec2011.pdf
Van den Berg, H. and Jiggins, J., 2007. Investing in farmers – The impacts of farmer field schools in relation to
integrated pest management. World Development, 35(4), pp.663–686.
World Bank, 2012. World Development Indicators 2012. [online] available at: http://data.worldbank.org/sites/
default/files/wdi-2012-ebook.pdf
Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional paper, (42).
Wunder, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence.
Environment and development economics, 13(3), pg. 279.
Wunder, S. and Alb´an, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro
and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 65(4), pp.685 – 698.
Wunder, S., Engel, S., and Pagiola, S., 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for
environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4),
pp.834 – 852.
Xu, Z., Bennett, M. T., Tao, R., and Xu, J., 2004. China’s Sloping Land Conversion Programme four years on:
current situation, pending issues. International Forestry Review, 6(4), pp.317–326.
Zbinden, S. and Lee, D. R., 2005. Paying for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Participation in Costa
Rica’s PSA Program. World Development, 33(2), pp.255 – 272.
Zheng, H., Glewwe, P., Polasky, S., and Xu, J., 2011. Reputation, policy risk, and land use: A study of China’s
Grain for Green programme. Working paper(39). Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics
Research.
27. Typeset by The Digital Parent Company Ltd, www.digitalparentco.com
Printed on 100% recycled paper.