Harmful effects of UVR exposure in childhood: 
          epidemiological evidence


                  Adele Green
           Queensland Institute of Medical
                Research, Australia
                          &
            University of Manchester, UK
Outline
1. Levels of UVR exposure in childhood

2. Childhood skin effects: Benign to cancer

3. Risk factors – genetic, solar UVR

4. Is childhood a susceptible window?

5. Primary prevention
Levels of UVR exposure in childhood

• Estimated mean summer sun exposure
      2-4 hours/day: similar across studies
      -summer in Europe/Canada; year round in
                                           Australia
• Estimated average UV exposure
      - 8 times greater in Australia than Denmark

• Estimated % of life-UVR (up to 60 y) received
  by children <20 y
      - 50%: Australia    25%: Denmark
Benign skin effects of UVR in childhood
• Photoaging- prevalence in 13-15 yr olds (assessed 
  by skin surface microtopography) 
-in Scotland: 33% with mild skin damage
-in Australia: 40-70%                 (Fritschi et al 1995)


• Melanocytic naevi (moles)- median counts
         Germany          Tropical Queensland
             (Bauer et al 2005)          (Harrison et al 2005)

Age 2:              3                           20
Age 5:              7                           60
Age 6-7:            17                          70
Skin cancer incidence in childhood


• Melanoma – rare < 20 years: accounts
  for 2% of all melanomas


• BCC, SCC – negligible sporadic
Melanoma in Females by Age in England

                                   CUTANEOUS MELANOMA INCIDENCE IN FEMALES BY AGE GROUP
                                                  IN ENGLAND (1979-2006)

                                 400
INCIDENCE RATE (PER 10^6 PERSO




                                 350

                                 300
        YEARS AT RISK)




                                 250                                                                       <25
                                                                                                           25-44
                                 200
                                                                                                           45-64
                                 150                                                                       65-89

                                 100

                                  50

                                   0
                                   1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
                                                             YEAR OF DIAGNOSIS
Melanoma in Females <25 Years by site
Melanoma at ages 10-24 years:
                     England vs Australia



Annual incidence rates per million in 2006

                     England           Australia

     Males           15                43

     Females         24                51
Causal pathways to melanoma



Genes                    Environment
Genetic susceptibility
• Mutations in “direct effect” genes eg CDKN2A - rare

•**Multiple genes controlling pigmentation in skin, hair, eyes

•**Tendency to multiple naevi (moles)
Youth Melanoma -pigmentary risk factors

                            OR     95% CI
            Brown           1.0
Eye         Hazel           3.7   1.0-13.5
Colour      Green           3.8   0.9-16.5
            Blue            4.5   1.5-13.6
            Brown/Black     1.0
Hair
            Blonde          1.7   0.8-3.7
Colour
            Red             5.4   1.0-28.4
            Dark            1.0
Tanning     Medium          3.4   0.7-16.5
Ability     Mild            3.9   1.0-16.0
            No Tan          4.7   0.9-24.6
Youth Melanoma -
                  freckling and family history

                           OR         95% CI
            None           1.0
Facial      Few            0.6        0.2-1.7
Freckling   Some           1.0        0.4-2.9
            Many          3.2        0.9-12.3
Relative No                1.0
with
melanoma Yes              4.0        0.8-18.9


                                 Youl et al, Int J Cancer 2002
UVR causes melanoma


    Sun exposure
Artificial tanning devices

Class 1 carcinogens (IARC
          2009)
Latitude gradient for
               (childhood)melanoma




60
50
40
30
20
10
0
                y




                      A




                                 LD
      K




                            Z
              an




                     S




                           N
     U




                                Q
                    U
             m
           er
          G
Cohort study of melanocytic nevi
                                in adolescents


Methods         N= 110, aged 12-14 yr, followed 4 yrs

                All melanocytic nevi on body mapped photographed

Results    Amount of
          school lunch   Naevi: Face & Neck     Shoulder & Back
           time in sun
                         OR       95%CI       OR     95%CI

          Very little    1.0                  1.0
           Some          1.8      1.2-2.6     1.7    1.1-2.5
             All         1.7      1.2-2.6     1.8    1.2-2.8


                              Darlington et al, Arch Dermatol, 2002
Childhood a susceptible window?
Migration studies
                            Relative Risk
   native-born
high exposure               1.0

                            0.9
 “forward”
 migration                  0.4
                            0.3

                            Relative Risk
                            4.0
 “reverse”
                            2.5
 migration
                            1.5
   native-born
 low exposure               1.0

            birth       death
UVR Protection campaigns in high-risk
                                populations

    Underlying trends in Melanoma awareness
                                   Australia
•   1960s – Melanoma public and
             professional education

•   1980s – Prevention campaign
             “Slip, slop, slap”


•   1990s – “SunSmart” Campaign
             Emphasis on sun protection in
                children
Melanoma incidence trends among children aged 0-14 yrs

                    in Australia, 1983-2006, by sex




                                                  Queensland
Melanoma incidence trends for children 10-14 yrs
                                         in Australia, 1983-2006




Source: Australian Paediatric Cancer Registry




                                                                       Queensland
Trends in melanoma incidence
            among children in Australia (and Sweden)

Possible influence of sun protection programs

Since late 1980s/early 1990s:
• community education programs on sun protection (shirts,
  hats, sunscreen) I G I N A L R E P O R T
                OR

• policy emphasis eg accreditation programs for pre- ,
  primary schools
From mid-1990s:
• melanoma incidence rates among children aged 10-14
  years have decreased significantly by 8.5% per year

                                              Baade et al 2011
ng p eople
                          in you
                mela noma
   vention of
Pre                  Increase
                         Awareness-
                     Personal; Professional; Policymakers..


•Avoidance of intense sun, including sunbeds

•Use of clothes &
Sunscreen in summer


…in childhood
Green

Green

  • 1.
    Harmful effects of UVR exposure in childhood:  epidemiological evidence Adele Green Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia & University of Manchester, UK
  • 2.
    Outline 1. Levels ofUVR exposure in childhood 2. Childhood skin effects: Benign to cancer 3. Risk factors – genetic, solar UVR 4. Is childhood a susceptible window? 5. Primary prevention
  • 3.
    Levels of UVRexposure in childhood • Estimated mean summer sun exposure 2-4 hours/day: similar across studies -summer in Europe/Canada; year round in Australia • Estimated average UV exposure - 8 times greater in Australia than Denmark • Estimated % of life-UVR (up to 60 y) received by children <20 y - 50%: Australia 25%: Denmark
  • 4.
    Benign skin effectsof UVR in childhood • Photoaging- prevalence in 13-15 yr olds (assessed  by skin surface microtopography)  -in Scotland: 33% with mild skin damage -in Australia: 40-70% (Fritschi et al 1995) • Melanocytic naevi (moles)- median counts Germany Tropical Queensland (Bauer et al 2005) (Harrison et al 2005) Age 2: 3 20 Age 5: 7 60 Age 6-7: 17 70
  • 5.
    Skin cancer incidencein childhood • Melanoma – rare < 20 years: accounts for 2% of all melanomas • BCC, SCC – negligible sporadic
  • 6.
    Melanoma in Femalesby Age in England CUTANEOUS MELANOMA INCIDENCE IN FEMALES BY AGE GROUP IN ENGLAND (1979-2006) 400 INCIDENCE RATE (PER 10^6 PERSO 350 300 YEARS AT RISK) 250 <25 25-44 200 45-64 150 65-89 100 50 0 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 YEAR OF DIAGNOSIS
  • 7.
    Melanoma in Females<25 Years by site
  • 8.
    Melanoma at ages10-24 years: England vs Australia Annual incidence rates per million in 2006 England Australia Males 15 43 Females 24 51
  • 9.
    Causal pathways tomelanoma Genes Environment
  • 10.
    Genetic susceptibility • Mutationsin “direct effect” genes eg CDKN2A - rare •**Multiple genes controlling pigmentation in skin, hair, eyes •**Tendency to multiple naevi (moles)
  • 11.
    Youth Melanoma -pigmentaryrisk factors OR 95% CI Brown 1.0 Eye Hazel 3.7 1.0-13.5 Colour Green 3.8 0.9-16.5 Blue 4.5 1.5-13.6 Brown/Black 1.0 Hair Blonde 1.7 0.8-3.7 Colour Red 5.4 1.0-28.4 Dark 1.0 Tanning Medium 3.4 0.7-16.5 Ability Mild 3.9 1.0-16.0 No Tan 4.7 0.9-24.6
  • 12.
    Youth Melanoma - freckling and family history OR 95% CI None 1.0 Facial Few 0.6 0.2-1.7 Freckling Some 1.0 0.4-2.9 Many 3.2 0.9-12.3 Relative No 1.0 with melanoma Yes 4.0 0.8-18.9 Youl et al, Int J Cancer 2002
  • 13.
    UVR causes melanoma Sun exposure Artificial tanning devices Class 1 carcinogens (IARC 2009)
  • 14.
    Latitude gradient for (childhood)melanoma 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 y A LD K Z an S N U Q U m er G
  • 15.
    Cohort study ofmelanocytic nevi in adolescents Methods N= 110, aged 12-14 yr, followed 4 yrs All melanocytic nevi on body mapped photographed Results Amount of school lunch Naevi: Face & Neck Shoulder & Back time in sun OR 95%CI OR 95%CI Very little 1.0 1.0 Some 1.8 1.2-2.6 1.7 1.1-2.5 All 1.7 1.2-2.6 1.8 1.2-2.8 Darlington et al, Arch Dermatol, 2002
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Migration studies Relative Risk native-born high exposure 1.0 0.9 “forward” migration 0.4 0.3 Relative Risk 4.0 “reverse” 2.5 migration 1.5 native-born low exposure 1.0 birth death
  • 18.
    UVR Protection campaignsin high-risk populations Underlying trends in Melanoma awareness Australia • 1960s – Melanoma public and professional education • 1980s – Prevention campaign “Slip, slop, slap” • 1990s – “SunSmart” Campaign Emphasis on sun protection in children
  • 20.
    Melanoma incidence trendsamong children aged 0-14 yrs in Australia, 1983-2006, by sex Queensland
  • 21.
    Melanoma incidence trendsfor children 10-14 yrs in Australia, 1983-2006 Source: Australian Paediatric Cancer Registry Queensland
  • 22.
    Trends in melanomaincidence among children in Australia (and Sweden) Possible influence of sun protection programs Since late 1980s/early 1990s: • community education programs on sun protection (shirts, hats, sunscreen) I G I N A L R E P O R T OR • policy emphasis eg accreditation programs for pre- , primary schools From mid-1990s: • melanoma incidence rates among children aged 10-14 years have decreased significantly by 8.5% per year Baade et al 2011
  • 23.
    ng p eople in you mela noma vention of Pre Increase Awareness- Personal; Professional; Policymakers.. •Avoidance of intense sun, including sunbeds •Use of clothes & Sunscreen in summer …in childhood