Ladies and gentlemen, introducing.... the MOOC turtle!
This presentation explores five interrelated concepts - Retention, Research, Reputation, Recruitment and Revenue - that might be applied when attempting to judge the success or failure of a MOOC (from the Higher Education Institution perspective). It also touches on broader social and philanthropic goals, and their potential implications.
4. RET Retention
RES Research
REP Reputation
REC Recruitment
REV Revenue
What constitutes
success?
5. RET Retention
• More data for research
• More exposure to University teaching
• More exposure to promotional links etc
6. Challenges
RET Retention
- Fostering community
- Faculty presence
- Targets: what is good/bad? 50% per week?
- Low cost = low commitment?
7. RES Research
• Analytics on student behaviours/learning patterns
• Demographic data from surveys
• Improve academic engagement with other online
material / sandpit for experimentation
8. RES Research
Challenges
- No individual learner tracking – cannot
accurately tie learning patterns with
demographics
- Resource implication for data analysis
9. REP Reputation
• Enrolment = Brand awareness, e.g. –
• Educational – exposure to quality of teaching material
• Student experience – includes sense of community, support and
presence
• Strategic presence – e.g. U21, FLAN, etc
11. REC Recruitment
• AS/A-level students for UG courses
• UG students/alumni/65+ for PG courses
12. REC Recruitment
Challenges
- Tracking -> analytics Uni webpages, enrolment
questionnaire
- How much is enough? Break even or profit?
- Pitching of academic level
- Collaborate with schools for UG? (also an opportunity)
13. REV Revenue
• Direct fee?
• Certificates / exams
• Amazon sales
---------------------------
• ACADEMIC: Pre-requisite for paid-for course (e.g. CPD)
• MARKETING: Taster for paid-for course
14. REV Revenue
Challenges
- Administrative resource
- Uni Approval / Accreditation processes
- Reputational impact if too money orientated??