The document discusses issues around cultural heritage legislation and licensing digital cultural works. It notes there are inconsistencies in policies, no simple licensing procedure, and no coherent revenue model. It proposes updating legislation, automating licensing, including Creative Commons or public domain provisions, and considering public mission and business models. Dilemmas around licensing public domain material or not are presented, as well as options like non-commercial licenses, government licenses, and fair use licenses. Suggestions include using public domain markings, the most liberal Creative Commons license, and providing clear licensing information.

1. 2
1

2. ]
GLAM
2

3. issues
3

4. 5 mins
4

6. cultural heritage
legislation

7. cultural heritage
legislation

8. cultural heritage
legislation

9. cultural heritage
CC over PD licensing
legislation

10. cultural heritage
CC over PD licensing
legislation

11. cultural heritage legislation

12. cultural heritage legislation

13. cultural heritage legislation

15. Parthenon
* Iktinos + Kallikrates
* 447-438 BC

16. [permissions]
Non
commercial reproduce Commercial
take pictures

17. The problem:
*additional rights over PD
*inconsistent policies
*no simple licensing procedure
*no coherent revenue model
9

18. Proposals:
*update legislation/ statutory
regulations
*automate licensing procedure
*include CC-like or PD provisions
*think of your
* public mission
* business model
10

19. cc over pd licensing

20. cc over pd licensing

21. cc over pd licensing

22. [dilemmas]
2 license CC
PD material licensing
or
Not 2 license

23. [options]
NC licences
Gov licences
“Fair Use” Liceces

24. [suggestions]
use PD marking
most liberal CC
licensing info

25. Q + A
email p.tsiavos@lse.ac.uk

26. Q + A
email p.tsiavos@lse.ac.uk