The document analyzes giving and attendance statistics from Emmaus Church between 2006-2012. It finds that attendance and giving grew initially in 2006 but then fluctuated. Temperature is negatively correlated with attendance, with each 3 degree increase leading to 1 fewer person. Attendance is positively correlated with giving, with each additional person contributing around $9.66. A typical year shows attendance and giving peaking in spring, dipping in summer, and rising in December.
Americans are very generous. Donors continue to give just not through the church any more. Today donors are giving directly to organizations that are demonstrating impact and effectiveness in the cause they care about.
In the first presentation of this series, we examined income distributions to endowments. In this presentation, we get even more specific and look at unitized endowment pools, including what they are, how they work, and the benefits and drawbacks of using them. And we answer the question, "To unitize, or not to unitize?"
Americans are very generous. Donors continue to give just not through the church any more. Today donors are giving directly to organizations that are demonstrating impact and effectiveness in the cause they care about.
In the first presentation of this series, we examined income distributions to endowments. In this presentation, we get even more specific and look at unitized endowment pools, including what they are, how they work, and the benefits and drawbacks of using them. And we answer the question, "To unitize, or not to unitize?"
On January 10th, Auburn’s Center for the Study of Theological Education hosted a webinar for financial aid officers, admissions staff and student personnel at theological schools on the latest government regulations for income-based repayment plans for federal educational loans. This information will assist financial aid officers and others who counsel students and recent graduates in repayment options as they move into ministry.
ASPECTOS FUNDAMENTALES DE LOS DIFERENTES PROCESOS DE MANUFACTURAcesar rios
Manufactura, descripción de los procesos de fabricaciones convencionales.
Métodos de manufacturas conocidos:
* Tornos.
* Taladros.
* Fresadoras.
* Prensas excéntricas e hidráulicas.
Npm : 2012 4350 1228
Nama : Syahroni
Kelas : R7H
Mata Kuliah : Komputer Grafik
Dosen : Nahot Frastian, M.Kom
Program Studi : Teknik Informatika
Universitas : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Should You Conduct Clinical Trials? What You Need to KnowCarmen Arismendy
Medscape Business of Medicine | Should You Conduct Clinical Trials? What You Need to Know. Margaret F. Fay, PhD, RN, CCRC, CRA, J. Michael Fay, BIS, CRA, Carmen Arismendy, MD, CCRC
DisclosuresOctober 11, 2010
On January 10th, Auburn’s Center for the Study of Theological Education hosted a webinar for financial aid officers, admissions staff and student personnel at theological schools on the latest government regulations for income-based repayment plans for federal educational loans. This information will assist financial aid officers and others who counsel students and recent graduates in repayment options as they move into ministry.
ASPECTOS FUNDAMENTALES DE LOS DIFERENTES PROCESOS DE MANUFACTURAcesar rios
Manufactura, descripción de los procesos de fabricaciones convencionales.
Métodos de manufacturas conocidos:
* Tornos.
* Taladros.
* Fresadoras.
* Prensas excéntricas e hidráulicas.
Npm : 2012 4350 1228
Nama : Syahroni
Kelas : R7H
Mata Kuliah : Komputer Grafik
Dosen : Nahot Frastian, M.Kom
Program Studi : Teknik Informatika
Universitas : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Should You Conduct Clinical Trials? What You Need to KnowCarmen Arismendy
Medscape Business of Medicine | Should You Conduct Clinical Trials? What You Need to Know. Margaret F. Fay, PhD, RN, CCRC, CRA, J. Michael Fay, BIS, CRA, Carmen Arismendy, MD, CCRC
DisclosuresOctober 11, 2010
Visual hull construction from semitransparent coloured silhouettesijcga
This paper attempts to create coloured
semi
-
transparent shadow images that can be projected onto
multiple screens simultaneously from different viewpoints. The inputs to this approach are a set of coloured
shadow images and view angles, projection information and light configurations for the f
inal projections.
We propose a method to convert coloured semi
-
transparent shadow images to a 3D visual hull
. A
shadowpix type method is used to incorporate varying ratio RGB values for each voxel. This computes the
desired image independently for each vie
wpoint from an arbitrary angle. An attenuation factor is used to
curb the coloured shadow images beyond a certain distance. The end result is a continuous animated
image that changes due to the rotated projection of the transparent visual hull.
Things that are making regular giving programs flourish.
Covering budgeting, channel opportunities, communications planning, growing value, measurement and retention
Overview of income trends in the state of Oregon. Comparing total personal income, wages, transfer payments over time and across regions within Oregon. Assessing the Great Recession's impact on median family incomes in the Portland and Salem regions. Also showing how to apply Census and BEA income data to similar topics and pair with other data sources, like housing costs, household debt, and job polarization.
FORK THE PORKZane & Brian1Assumptions6 .docxbudbarber38650
FORK
THE
PORK
Zane & Brian
1
Assumptions
6% growth from year to year (growth rate of Missoula is 3%, 3% branding awareness)
A percentage of sales for products is from survey data and pricing of our products
5% of cost of product is spoiled/wasted
$500 in each capital expenditures and miscellaneous for years 2&3 for replacing appliances, aprons, kitchenware, etc. and miscellaneous for promotion like free shirts and koozies
No pay raises
2
Menu
Funding Requirements
$75,000 from Friends Family and Fools
Will pay back with positive net income
Capital Equipment
Will spend $14252.46 on Equipment
Most will come from Wasser Strom
Range from Food appliances and clean up material
[2]
5
Operating Costs
Sales Projections
[1]
Break Even Analysis
Break even in August of year 2.
Startup Fixed Costs:
$70,179.32
Variable Cost/ sale:
$3.47
Average Sale Revenue:
$8.20
Sensitivity Analysis
9
10
THANK YOU
[1] CalendarMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember11Out to Lunch18011Garden City brewfest57922Downtown ToNight186223Out to Lunch1803334Downtown ToNight186444555Out To Lunch1805666Downtown ToNight1866777788Out to Lunch1808899Downtown ToNight1869910Out to Lunch18010101011Downtown ToNight186111111121212Out To Lunch18012Hemp Fest613131313Downtown ToNight18613141414141515Out to Lunch18015151616Downtown ToNight186161617Out to Lunch18017171718Downtown ToNight186181818191919Out To Lunch18019202020Downtown ToNight18620212121212222Out to Lunch18022Roots Fest338222323Downtown ToNight18623Roots Fest3382324Out to Lunch1802424Roots Fest3382425Downtown ToNight186252525262626Out To Lunch18026272727Downtown ToNight18627282828282929Out to Lunch18029293030Downtown ToNight18630303131Total579Total1465Total1652Total2478Total613
[1]
[2]
Cash DisbursementsJan.Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJulyAugSept.Oct.Nov.Dec.
Inventory-$ -$ -$ 377.82$ 2,089.44$ 3,945.50$ 4,849.21$ 4,849.72$ 1,600.63$
Rent-$ -$ -$ 200.00$ 248.00$ 488.00$ 560.00$ 776.00$ 248.00$ -$ -$ -$
Wages-$ -$ -$ -$ 165.00$ 693.00$ 874.50$ 1,369.50$ 214.50$ -$ -$ -$
Capital expenditures50,000.00$ 14,252.46$
Insurance1,500.00$
Licensing340.00$
Registration150.00$ 500.00$
MDA payment282.43$ 701.02$ 779.83$ 1,170.59$ 296.62$
Taxes0000651.96$ 1,646.60$ 1,842.06$ 2,770.77$ 688.84$ 000
Total Cash Disbursements51,650.00$ 14,752.46$ -$ 917.82$ 2,784.87$ 5,827.52$ 7,063.53$ 8,165.81$ 2,359.75$ -$ -$ -$
If we cant make it to events
Event
Events /
Year
Estimated
Customers
Estimated
Oportunity
Cost/Event
Oportunity
Cost for all
Events
Roots Fest11013(8,935.31)$ (8,935.31)$
Out to Lunch13180(1,588.50)$ (20,650.50)$
Downtown Tonigh.
The Oregon Office of Economic Analysis forecasts the state economy and General Fund and Lottery Fund revenues. This slide presentation is a part of the June 2018 forecast (released May 23rd).
BreakEvenClassic Gardens and LandscapesBreak Even Point in UnitsBa.docxbartholomeocoombs
BreakEvenClassic Gardens and LandscapesBreak Even Point in UnitsBased on Sales PriceSales Price$250Assigned Variable Cost$125Fixed Cost for Department$15,000Per Unit Margin (Profit)$125Break Even Point120# SoldFixed
CostTotal
Variable
CostsTotal
CostsDollar
SalesProfit0$15,000$0$15,000$0-$15,0005075100125150175200225250
Gross MarginsClassic Gardens and Landscapes (CGL) Gross Margin by Department, Six MonthsDepartmentsAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberTotalLawn Maintenance$4,500$5,200$6,500$8,400$8,500$10,000$43,100Tree & Shrubbery $5,000$3,400$3,500$6,500$12,000$12,500$42,900Patio and Furniture$12,000$9,000$15,500$13,500$15,000$12,450$77,450Fountains and Irrigation$10,000$5,500$6,500$7,200$7,000$8,000$44,200Design Consulting$5,000$5,200$3,500$4,500$3,500$8,000$29,700Total Gross Margin$36,500$28,300$35,500$40,100$46,000$50,950$237,350
Sheet1Blue Lake SportsNumber of Transactions by DepartmentWeek of September 1DepartmentCityTransactionsApparel Atlanta71Baseball Atlanta96Basketball Atlanta82Bike & Skate Atlanta70Exercise Atlanta69Fishing Atlanta71Footwear Atlanta93Game Room Atlanta55Golf Atlanta52Hockey Atlanta79Hunting Atlanta72LacrosseAtlanta65Running Atlanta95Winter Sports Atlanta605158816371566795678296699756Apparel Chicago59Baseball Chicago66Basketball Chicago95Bike & Skate Chicago66Exercise Chicago50Fishing Chicago78Footwear Chicago88Game Room Chicago82Golf Chicago57Hockey Chicago69Hunting Chicago80LacrosseChicago94Running Chicago90Winter Sports Chicago89Apparel St. Louis67Baseball St. Louis72Basketball St. Louis55Bike & Skate St. Louis73Exercise St. Louis60Fishing St. Louis75Footwear St. Louis95Game Room St. Louis89Golf St. Louis85Hockey St. Louis93Hunting St. Louis59LacrosseSt. Louis83Running St. Louis100Winter Sports St. Louis83
TransactionDataBlue Lake SportsRandom Transaction AnalysisLocationSales Ticket
Before TaxSales Ticket
with TaxAtlanta$195.32Atlanta$200.76Atlanta$225.45Atlanta$225.89Atlanta$187.20Chicago$184.32Chicago$275.00Chicago$325.89Chicago$199.99Chicago$242.89Chicago$179.89Boston$139.99Boston$299.99Boston$119.99Boston$475.00Boston$375.00St. Louis$135.99St. Louis$175.89St. Louis$195.99St. Louis$225.00St. Louis$85.99
CardFeesBlue Lake Sports Fixed Credit Card FeesNumber of TransactionsFee per TransactionAtlantaBostonChicagoSt. LouisWhite Card$0.2580006000500011000Blue Card$0.35600075001000015000Platinum Card$0.40750080001500011500Gold Card$0.451200085002000016000Fees by LocationAtlantaBostonChicagoSt. LouisFees by Card TypeWhite CardBlue CardPlatinum CardGold Card
Lookup_DataCityTax RateAtlanta8.00%Boston6.25%Chicago9.50%St. Louis8.50%
ContractsEller SystemsProject Hours
Billable HoursEller SystemsBillable Hours To Date10/11/22Client NameProduct/ServiceDateBillableAmir AtefWeb Site Development10/11/224.00Arnold RobertAccounting Installation5.00Arthur WestonContent Development3.00Arthur WestonContent Development6.00Charlie LindbergERP: Enterprise Resource Planning4.00Charlie LindbergERP: Enterprise Resource Planning6.
2. PurposePurpose
Church VisionChurch Vision
To bring the Kingdom of God to our community/cityTo bring the Kingdom of God to our community/city
PurposePurpose
To determine a course of action toward achieving ourTo determine a course of action toward achieving our
vision through analysis of the giving and attendancevision through analysis of the giving and attendance
datadata
3. Findings/AgendaFindings/Agenda
Historical DataHistorical Data
2012 was good year for attendance2012 was good year for attendance
2012 showed increased giving2012 showed increased giving
Driving ForcesDriving Forces
Temperature drives attendanceTemperature drives attendance
To a lesser extent rain also drives attendanceTo a lesser extent rain also drives attendance
Attendance drives givingAttendance drives giving
Wellbeing drives givingWellbeing drives giving
Yearly TrendsYearly Trends
Attendance and giving have consistent peaks and valleysAttendance and giving have consistent peaks and valleys
Attendance becomes more consistent as the yearAttendance becomes more consistent as the year
progressesprogresses
4. Historical DataHistorical Data
Data UsedData Used
Historical attendance and giving data from JanuaryHistorical attendance and giving data from January
2006 to December 2012 was used2006 to December 2012 was used
Data ScrubbedData Scrubbed
Statistical outliers were removedStatistical outliers were removed
This data was used to determine trendsThis data was used to determine trends
See plots on next few chartsSee plots on next few charts
Data CombinedData Combined
A third measure is the giving per personA third measure is the giving per person
5. Descriptive StatisticsDescriptive Statistics
AttendanceAttendance
Average: 204 (was 202)Average: 204 (was 202)
Top/Bottom: 71 (1/1/2006) / 407 (3/23/2008)Top/Bottom: 71 (1/1/2006) / 407 (3/23/2008)
Giving (General Fund only)Giving (General Fund only)
Average: $5,187.36 (was $Average: $5,187.36 (was $4,986.894,986.89))
Top/Bottom: $635.00 (7/25/2010) / $67,376.30 (5/16/2010)Top/Bottom: $635.00 (7/25/2010) / $67,376.30 (5/16/2010)
Giving per PersonGiving per Person
Average: $25.78 (was $25.29)Average: $25.78 (was $25.29)
Top/Bottom: $4.29 to $74.98Top/Bottom: $4.29 to $74.98
11. Historical DataHistorical Data
SummarySummary
In both attendance and giving, 2006 was a year of growthIn both attendance and giving, 2006 was a year of growth
for Emmausfor Emmaus
After 2006:After 2006:
Attendance reached a peak, declined for a few years, andAttendance reached a peak, declined for a few years, and
showed growth again in 2012showed growth again in 2012
Giving per person appears to be going upGiving per person appears to be going up
Giving is increasingly growingGiving is increasingly growing
Conclusion:Conclusion:
Attendance trends might be turning aroundAttendance trends might be turning around
Giving trends are looking goodGiving trends are looking good
12. Driving ForcesDriving Forces
StatisticsStatistics
I added historical weather, economic, and wellbeing data to the givingI added historical weather, economic, and wellbeing data to the giving
and attendance data and checked for statistically significantand attendance data and checked for statistically significant
correlationcorrelation
Data UsedData Used
WeatherWeather
Maximum temperature (°F)Maximum temperature (°F)
Minimum temperature (°F)Minimum temperature (°F)
Precipitation (in)Precipitation (in)
Wind (mph)Wind (mph)
EconomyEconomy
S&P 500 Friday Closing IndexS&P 500 Friday Closing Index
WellbeingWellbeing
CDC Flu Reporting Data (%)CDC Flu Reporting Data (%)
15. Correlation SummaryCorrelation Summary
Attendance is negatively correlated to temperatureAttendance is negatively correlated to temperature
Meaning: As temperature goes up attendance goes downMeaning: As temperature goes up attendance goes down
Sensitivity: Every 3°F hotter we lose 1 personSensitivity: Every 3°F hotter we lose 1 person
Giving is positively correlated to attendanceGiving is positively correlated to attendance
Meaning: As attendance goes up so does givingMeaning: As attendance goes up so does giving
Sensitivity: Every additional person brings $9.66 (was $11.72)Sensitivity: Every additional person brings $9.66 (was $11.72)
ConclusionConclusion
Combining the two correlations shows us that giving isCombining the two correlations shows us that giving is
negatively correlated to temperaturenegatively correlated to temperature
Meaning: As temperature goes up giving goes downMeaning: As temperature goes up giving goes down
Sensitivity: For every 3°F giving is down $9.66Sensitivity: For every 3°F giving is down $9.66
To a lesser extent: Giving is positively correlated to wellbeingTo a lesser extent: Giving is positively correlated to wellbeing
Meaning: As wellbeing goes down so does givingMeaning: As wellbeing goes down so does giving
16. Yearly TrendsYearly Trends
I took the total historical data and plotted it year toI took the total historical data and plotted it year to
year to see look for seasonal trendsyear to see look for seasonal trends
From these trends I ‘built’ a typical year with aFrom these trends I ‘built’ a typical year with a
statistical variation about its meanstatistical variation about its mean
21. Year-to-Year SummaryYear-to-Year Summary
AttendanceAttendance
After the initial year of growth (2006), attendance followed a similarAfter the initial year of growth (2006), attendance followed a similar
yearly trendyearly trend
There is a peak at week 10 to 20 (mid-March through May)There is a peak at week 10 to 20 (mid-March through May)
There is a mid-summer lull in attendanceThere is a mid-summer lull in attendance
December has an attendance peakDecember has an attendance peak
There is high variance toward the beginning of the year shrinking asThere is high variance toward the beginning of the year shrinking as
the year goes onthe year goes on
GivingGiving
After the initial year of growth (2006), giving followed a similar yearlyAfter the initial year of growth (2006), giving followed a similar yearly
trendtrend
Giving is smoother (less peaks and valleys) than attendanceGiving is smoother (less peaks and valleys) than attendance
Giving variance is similar throughout the entire yearGiving variance is similar throughout the entire year