Case Study


LAUREN & FLORIAN
                                1
Index
   History and Background
   Welch: Bio
   Welch: Acquisitions & Innovations
   Welch: Key Events at GE
   Leadership
   Six Sigma
   Immelt: Bio
   Immelt: Changes at GE
   Immelt: Key Events at GE
   Immelt: Leadership Style
   Conclusions

                                        2
History and Background
 Thomas Edison invented incandescent electric lamp in
 1879

 1890 Edison General Electric Company formed, then
 in 1892 merged with Thomas-Houston Electric
 Company

 The firm developed best practice standards, including
 licensing its technology, developing policies for
 employees, a formal hierarchy, financial
 controls, restructuring, and automation
                                                          3
Welch: Bio
 Born on November 19, 1935 in Salem Massachusetts

 Studied Chemical Engineering at the University of
  Massachusetts

 Did PhD at University of Illinois

 He joined GE in 1960 and was not happy with excessive
  bureaucratic culture of company

 Hit his peak as CEO in 1981 as the eighth and youngest
  chairman and CEO in the history of GE

                                                           4
Welch: Acquisitions & Innovations
 Welch acquired several businesses

 Employers Reinsurance and Radio Corporation of America

 National Broadcasting Corporations

 To promote innovation he launched a program called
  “Work Out“

 “Work Out“ brought various employees from different
  departments together to asses company and make
  suggestions for improvement

                                                           5
Welch: Key Events at GE
 As soon as Welch was in charge he made several
 changes aimed at making GE more profitable
   “Number one or number two” strategy
       He insisted that GE should be among the top two players in
        every segment it operates; failing to do so will result in closure
        of that particular segment – “Fix it, sell it or close it!”


 To improve communication at all levels he trimmed
 the number of management levels from 9 to 6


                                                                             6
Leadership
 He believed that involving company employees in
 quality processes has a great potential benefit

 Welch was good at motivating employees and stirring
 them into action
   e.g. He frequently wrote notes to employees
    appreciating their contribution, this made them more
    motivated

 Welch stressed the importance of communication at
 GE
                                                           7
Leadership
 To determine rewards at GE, Welch devised a system where
  people are classified into 3 categories

 Each department classified employees into 3 categories
  based on their performance
   Top 20 % , Middle 70 % and Bottom 10 %
     Top 20 % were generously rewarded, middle performers were
      motivated to emulate top performers whereas bottom 10 % were
      fired

 He also introduced the elements of high performing
  leadership
   Four E’s: Energy, Energizer, Execute, Edge, and also Passion


                                                                     8
Six Sigma
 His commitment to quality led to adoption of Six Sigma at GE in
  mid 1990’s

 To launch Six Sigma, the company invested heavily in employees

 Six Sigma is a quality standard
    Streamlining processes to improve productivity, quality, speed and
     efficiency
    At the business level it improves profitability, market share and
     long-term viability
    At the process level it reduces defects and variation

 Employees were trained at different levels
    Green belts, black belts and master black belts

                                                                          9
Welch: Leadership Style
Strengths                 Weaknesses
 Motivating employees     Putting too much
 Constantly identified     pressure on employees
  other leaders at GE      Formed opinions too
 Aggressive leadership     quickly
 Communication            Criticized for some
 Charismatic
                            failed acquisitions e.g.
                            “Black&Decker” and
 Stayed visible at GE      mergers e.g.
 Succession planning       “Honeywell Inc.”

                                                       10
Immelt: Bio
 Born in 1956 in Ohio


 His father worked at GE and after some time at P&G and
  completing an MBA Immelt joined GE’s marketing division

 Immelt was shortlisted as a Welch successor


 He became CEO of GE right before 9/11


 The company faced a series of challenges after he took over
                                                                11
Immelt: Key Events at GE
 The events of 9/11 had lasting effects on the firm
    Some sectors of the business dealt with aviation and
     insurance, and they took a beating
    Stock value sank 20%


 There was also an anthrax scare, and GE was viewed
  with skepticism after other corporate scandals

 Immelt made some acquisitions, sold less profitable
  businesses, and increased GE’s global orientation
                                                            12
Immelt: Changes at GE
 Immelt caved to investor demands for transparency

 Restructured equity packages and GE’s portfolio

 Increased external communication

 Focused on intangible factors instead of just the bottom
  line, also was ‘green’ oriented

 Increased number of outsiders were brought in

 Took focus from production to marketing, stressed innovation
  and idea generation

                                                                 13
Immelt: Leadership Style
Strengths                     Weaknesses
 People person; more          Somewhat soft
  approachable than Welch      Approach too structured
 Focused on innovation        Spent too much time
 Increased transparency        placating stakeholders
 Less demanding leadership    Always compared to Welch
  style than Welch             Was reactive instead of
                                proactive at times



                                                           14
Conclusions
 Welch and Immelt obviously had very different
 leadership styles

 Welch seems to have been more charismatic and led
 with energy and passion, whereas Immelt was more
 approachable but formalized some processes that
 Welch accomplished naturally

 Immelt took over at GE during a difficult time, so the
 external environment impacted his leadership
                                                           15
16

GE Case Study

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Index  History and Background  Welch: Bio  Welch: Acquisitions & Innovations  Welch: Key Events at GE  Leadership  Six Sigma  Immelt: Bio  Immelt: Changes at GE  Immelt: Key Events at GE  Immelt: Leadership Style  Conclusions 2
  • 3.
    History and Background Thomas Edison invented incandescent electric lamp in 1879  1890 Edison General Electric Company formed, then in 1892 merged with Thomas-Houston Electric Company  The firm developed best practice standards, including licensing its technology, developing policies for employees, a formal hierarchy, financial controls, restructuring, and automation 3
  • 4.
    Welch: Bio  Bornon November 19, 1935 in Salem Massachusetts  Studied Chemical Engineering at the University of Massachusetts  Did PhD at University of Illinois  He joined GE in 1960 and was not happy with excessive bureaucratic culture of company  Hit his peak as CEO in 1981 as the eighth and youngest chairman and CEO in the history of GE 4
  • 5.
    Welch: Acquisitions &Innovations  Welch acquired several businesses  Employers Reinsurance and Radio Corporation of America  National Broadcasting Corporations  To promote innovation he launched a program called “Work Out“  “Work Out“ brought various employees from different departments together to asses company and make suggestions for improvement 5
  • 6.
    Welch: Key Eventsat GE  As soon as Welch was in charge he made several changes aimed at making GE more profitable  “Number one or number two” strategy  He insisted that GE should be among the top two players in every segment it operates; failing to do so will result in closure of that particular segment – “Fix it, sell it or close it!”  To improve communication at all levels he trimmed the number of management levels from 9 to 6 6
  • 7.
    Leadership  He believedthat involving company employees in quality processes has a great potential benefit  Welch was good at motivating employees and stirring them into action  e.g. He frequently wrote notes to employees appreciating their contribution, this made them more motivated  Welch stressed the importance of communication at GE 7
  • 8.
    Leadership  To determinerewards at GE, Welch devised a system where people are classified into 3 categories  Each department classified employees into 3 categories based on their performance  Top 20 % , Middle 70 % and Bottom 10 %  Top 20 % were generously rewarded, middle performers were motivated to emulate top performers whereas bottom 10 % were fired  He also introduced the elements of high performing leadership  Four E’s: Energy, Energizer, Execute, Edge, and also Passion 8
  • 9.
    Six Sigma  Hiscommitment to quality led to adoption of Six Sigma at GE in mid 1990’s  To launch Six Sigma, the company invested heavily in employees  Six Sigma is a quality standard  Streamlining processes to improve productivity, quality, speed and efficiency  At the business level it improves profitability, market share and long-term viability  At the process level it reduces defects and variation  Employees were trained at different levels  Green belts, black belts and master black belts 9
  • 10.
    Welch: Leadership Style Strengths Weaknesses  Motivating employees  Putting too much  Constantly identified pressure on employees other leaders at GE  Formed opinions too  Aggressive leadership quickly  Communication  Criticized for some  Charismatic failed acquisitions e.g. “Black&Decker” and  Stayed visible at GE mergers e.g.  Succession planning “Honeywell Inc.” 10
  • 11.
    Immelt: Bio  Bornin 1956 in Ohio  His father worked at GE and after some time at P&G and completing an MBA Immelt joined GE’s marketing division  Immelt was shortlisted as a Welch successor  He became CEO of GE right before 9/11  The company faced a series of challenges after he took over 11
  • 12.
    Immelt: Key Eventsat GE  The events of 9/11 had lasting effects on the firm  Some sectors of the business dealt with aviation and insurance, and they took a beating  Stock value sank 20%  There was also an anthrax scare, and GE was viewed with skepticism after other corporate scandals  Immelt made some acquisitions, sold less profitable businesses, and increased GE’s global orientation 12
  • 13.
    Immelt: Changes atGE  Immelt caved to investor demands for transparency  Restructured equity packages and GE’s portfolio  Increased external communication  Focused on intangible factors instead of just the bottom line, also was ‘green’ oriented  Increased number of outsiders were brought in  Took focus from production to marketing, stressed innovation and idea generation 13
  • 14.
    Immelt: Leadership Style Strengths Weaknesses  People person; more  Somewhat soft approachable than Welch  Approach too structured  Focused on innovation  Spent too much time  Increased transparency placating stakeholders  Less demanding leadership  Always compared to Welch style than Welch  Was reactive instead of proactive at times 14
  • 15.
    Conclusions  Welch andImmelt obviously had very different leadership styles  Welch seems to have been more charismatic and led with energy and passion, whereas Immelt was more approachable but formalized some processes that Welch accomplished naturally  Immelt took over at GE during a difficult time, so the external environment impacted his leadership 15
  • 16.