Downloaded 15 times
Uploaded byCrossref
FundRef Webinar
The document discusses the significance of a standardized funding data system for scholarly publishing to enable accurate tracking of funding sources linked to published research outputs. It outlines the challenges faced by funding bodies, publishers, and institutions in reporting and analyzing funding information due to lack of standardized metadata. Furthermore, it details the implementation of the Open Funder Registry by Crossref, which aims to facilitate the collection and reporting of funding data in a consistent manner.
More Related Content
FundRef Webinar
- 1. Kirsty Meddings Product Manager 10thNovember 2015 Funding data What, why and how?
- 3. A not-for-profit scholarlypublishing membership organization working to make content easy to find, cite, link, and assess. Over 5000 diverse members All disciplines, many business models 77 million DOIs, many content types
- 4. Funding data atCrossref A standard way of reporting funding sources for published scholarly research
- 9. <fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"> <p>This workwas supported in part by NIH grant R01 GM094800B to G.J.J., a gift to Caltech from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and a stipend from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung to M.P. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.</p> </fn> </fn-group> </back> </article>
- 10. <body> ... <sec> <title>Funding</title> <p>This work wassupported by the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http:// www.grf.org" id="GS1">Generic Research Foundation</grant-sponsor>, the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http://www.energy.gov" id="GS2">Department of Energy</grant- sponsor> Office of Science grant number <grant-num rid="GS2">DE-FG02- 04ER63803</grant-num>, and the <grant-sponsor xlink:href="http:// www.nih.gov" id="GS3">National Institutes of Health</grant-sponsor>. </p> </sec> </body>
- 11. National Institutes ofHealth NIH N.I.H. National Institute of Health National Institute for Health Abbreviations, misspellings, translations...
- 12. Why does thismatter?
- 13. Funding bodies cannoteasily track the published output of funding Why does this matter?
- 14. Funding bodies cannoteasily track the published output of funding Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants Why does this matter?
- 15. Funding bodies cannoteasily track the published output of funding Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants Institutions cannot easily link funding received to published output Why does this matter?
- 16. Funding bodies cannoteasily track the published output of funding Publishers cannot easily report which articles result from research supported by specific funders or grants Institutions cannot easily link funding received to published output Lack of standard metadata for funding sources makes it difficult to analyse or data mine Why does this matter?
- 17. Publishers Relationship with authors submitting manuscripts Establishedpublishing and peer-review systems Funders Relationship with researchers funded by agencies Established award systems and research management processes Crossref
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21. Open Funder Registry 11,500funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry
- 22. Open Funder Registry 11,500funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0
- 23. Open Funder Registry 11,500funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0 Updated and extended regularly
- 24. Open Funder Registry 11,500funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0 Updated and extended regularly Publishers use this list to ensure consistency
- 25. Open Funder Registry 11,500funder names and ID numbers from curated Elsevier SciVal registry Hosted by Crossref, available under CC0 Updated and extended regularly Publishers use this list to ensure consistency www.crossref.org/fundref/fundref_registry.html
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31. Funder Registry Publisher Submission System Grant Number Funder Production Systems Crossref Database& Query APIs Funders Researchers Institutions Publishers
- 32. Funder Registry Publisher Submission System Grant Number Funder Production Systems Crossref Database& Query APIs Funders Researchers Institutions Publishers
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36. Funder Registry Publisher Production Systems/ Typesetter Crossref Database & QueryAPIs Funders Researchers Institutions Publishers
- 37. Funder Registry Publisher Production Systems/ Typesetter Crossref Database & QueryAPIs Funders Researchers Institutions Publishers
- 38.
- 39.
- 40. Implementation 1. Collect fundingdata using Funder Registry taxonomy “The information submitted here should match the information provided in the paper’s acknowledgement section.”
- 41. Implementation 1. Collect fundingdata from authors on submission using Open Funder Registry taxonomy http://www.crossref.org/fundref
- 42.
- 43.
- 44. Implementation 2. Pass fundingdata from submission system to production systems Publisher Submission System Grant Number Funder
- 45. Implementation 2. Pass fundingdata from submission system to production systems Publisher Submission System Grant Number Funder Production Systems
- 46. Implementation 3. Deposit fundingdata with Crossref CrossMark participants should deposit funding data within CrossMark deposits CrossMark participation recommended for standard display of funding information
- 48. Implementation 3. Deposit fundingdata with CrossRef “funder_identifier”>http://dx.doi.org/10.13039.100000001
- 49. Implementation 3. Deposit fundingdata with Crossref
- 50. Implementation 3. Deposit fundingdata with Crossref http://help.crossref.org
- 51. Funder IDs areCritical Deposits with no funder ID will not be visible in FundRef Search or API Crossref will attempt to match deposits with funder_name only, but this is only picking up 20% of deposits The other 80% of funding data deposits with no IDs remain invisible Best practices: http://bit.ly/1Qf7R54
- 52. Look up fundingdata http://search.crossref.org/fundref
- 56.
- 60.
- 61.
- 62. Allows other systemsto access the funding data API Access
- 63. Latest Stats 180+ publishers& societies 600,000+ DOI deposits 11,500 funders in registry
- 64. Crossref’s database isthe only central source of standardised funding acknowledgement metadata from publications Accuracy of funding metadata is critical An increasing number of organizations and projects rely on this funding data to identify content and check compliance with funder policies Get involved and make the funding data from your publications available, accurate and transparent Summary
- 65. Publishers: deposit now! Nofees for funding data deposits Everyone else: no action required! No need to“join”- querying freely available
- 66.