Auguste Comte and Functionalism Auguste Comte and Biology Auguste Comte and his application of Early Physics Herbert Spencer and Functionalism Spencer’s Organismic Analogy The Functional Basics in Organic Analogy Emile Durkheim and Functionalism The Transition into Modern Functionalism Anthropology and Functionalism Bronislaw Malinowski and Functionalism A. R. Radcliffe Brown and Functionalism Talcott Parson and Functionalism Talcott Parson System of Social Action AGIL paradigm and Functionalism of Parson Criticism of Functionalism www.sociology.plus

1. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 1
FUNCTIONALISM
Posted on June 21, 2021 by Sociology Scholar
Category: Sociology
Tag: Functionalism

2. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 2
Introduction
Functionalism is the theoretical framework that analyzes society, social structures, interconnectivity,
and complex interrelationships. Comte, Spencer, Durkheim, Weber, Malinowski, Brown, and Parson
has contributed immensely to functionalism.
Title of contents
Auguste Comte and Functionalism
Auguste Comte and Biology
Auguste Comte and his application of Early Physics
Herbert Spencer and Functionalism
Spencer's Organismic Analogy
The Functional Basics in Organic Analogy
Emile Durkheim and Functionalism
The Transition into Modern Functionalism
Anthropology and Functionalism
Bronislaw Malinowski and Functionalism
A. R. Radcliffe Brown and Functionalism
Talcott Parson and Functionalism
Talcott Parson System of Social Action
AGIL paradigm and Functionalism of Parson
Criticism of Functionalism
Auguste Comte and Functionalism
From the early decades of the twentieth century, it was the right time to get a new discipline
dedicated to the systemic analysis of the social world. Thus, Auguste Comte added a name into an
accumulating body of theorizing about the nature and dynamics of societies.
Comte had preferred this new societal physics title, where he was supposed to study the social world's
fundamental nature. However, to Comte's dismay, he found that a Belgian statistician had taken the
title, and thus, he was forced to use the tag "sociology."
Auguste Comte and Biology
In attempting to establish sociology as a separate discipline, Comte assembled his central "hierarchy

3. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 3
of the sciences" theory to assert that the most complex science to emerge at last is sociology.
Sociology was in the process of arising from biology, and by doing it, it would complete the
hierarchical structure.
Thus, sociology was considered a queen science. Although biology analyzed biological organisms, the
brand new, emerging sociology was the analysis of social organisms or evaluating these structured
patterns of connections among societal organisms.
Comte began to analogize that society is a more complex organism. As a complex social organism,
societies are finally built not by individual human beings but, instead, from a complex social system:
households in societies with the practical equivalent of cells in biological organisms.
He further argued that all other parts of the social system like groups, associations, communities, and
other societal structures were extensive elaborations of the household and considered the
fundamental part of societies. And therefore, societies as social organisms were connected by
common civilization and political power.
Sociology's first theoretical analysis is developed from this theory of organismic analogy.
Comte divided the discipline of sociology into social statics, which includes structural properties of
the social, and social dynamics, which provides for processes formulating, nurturing, and
transforming the properties and relations among these structural properties that make up the social
organism. This theory of societal organism and a new mode of analysis was finally
called functionalism or, on occasion, structural functionalism.
The principle of functionalism is to envision a particular social structure as impacting the social
organism in its environment. In biology, the heart, kidney, lungs, stomach, or any biological structure
in an individual organism has a particular function for supporting the body. Similarly, society is
analyzed by discovering the functions of particular social structures.
Like individual organisms, social organisms also become complex as new social units that make up
the whole are becoming increasingly diverse. The social units are learned by examining the functions
they serve for supporting societies. According to Comte, social integration, coordination, regulation,
and control of various system elements are required for a social system to become complex.
Societies which is unable to meet this requirement will disclose the increased potential for social
pathologies. However, societies that can develop mechanisms of mutual interdependence among
various units and centers of power for political control of major system parts are most likely to meet
the requirement for social integration.
Comte believed that the progression of the scientific discipline of sociology would guide the future
advancement of biology.

4. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 4
Auguste Comte and his application of Early Physics
Comte has been a pioneer of the natural science perspective of precisely what sociology might be. In
similarity with other sciences, sociology can create explanatory laws regarding the properties and
kinetics of the social world. The primary law is when human beings organize themselves into different
social systems.
Newton's formulation of the law of gravity is competent in describing many of the properties and
dynamics of the cosmos. Comte asserted that it was possible for the social universe too. By creating
dynamics of fundamental properties of social systems universe, abstract laws can be formed.
He proposes the three main properties of the social universe as
Structural interdependencies between differentiated social units
Significant areas of power and authority
Cultural systems that monitor and regulate the actions of social units and individual actions.
These properties of the social universe have evolved because their dynamics revolve around
deepening system-level coordination and control among diverse societal subsystems. Hence
according to Comte, the explanatory methodology of Sociology came from physics.
Herbert Spencer and Functionalism
Spencer as a philosopher, started a project that he named Synthetic Philosophy. His primary goal was
to subsume subjects such as psychology, biology, ethics, physics, and sociology under a few
fundamental laws of the universe deduced from the laws of physics, which were articulated in the
19th century. Thus, the new law intends to explain that all organisms' evolution begins from simple to
complex forms.
Spencer published three volumes of Principles of Sociology, including various social phenomena
supporting data from biology and different societies. The data so collected from various societies were
labeled as descriptive sociology.
According to Spencer, biology is the study of individual organisms, whereas sociology is the study of
the organization of humans into societal structures. This sociological analysis of the organization of
organisms or superorganisms applies to any organism capable of organizing itself.
Spencer's Organismic Analogy
Similarities between the organisms and superorganisms (human beings) include:

5. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 5
They grow and progress, and their growth increases complexity and differentiation of structure.
Number of distinctive functions internally among them occurs along with differentiation of
structure.
Organic and superorganic are interdependent between diverse parts. So, change in one part of
an organism affects the structure of other parts;
Every unit in itself is an individual superorganism. Family (Society) or Lungs (Human body) is an
individual unit of the whole and a superorganism within itself.
Life of the whole of the organism can be destroyed, but the parts can survive.
Differences between organisms and superorganisms
Organisms have a greater level of connectedness and closeness of parts in comparison with
superorganisms.
The method of communication is vastly different. Communication occurs through molecular
waves in organisms, whereas in superorganisms, communication occurs through cultural
symbols organized into languages.
Consciousness and thought in organisms and superorganisms are significant areas in which they
differ vastly. All individuals in superorganisms have the capability for reasoning, consciousness,
and decision-making. In organisms, only one part is capable of consciousness.
The Functional Basics in Organic Analogy
The organismic analogy in Spencer’s work is significant as it is his major treatise on Principles of
Biology, where individual organisms are looked upon as fundamental requisites required to sustain
life.
Both superorganisms and organisms display basic functional needs that are necessary to ensure their
viability in an environment.
Society and social systems are made up of interrelated parts. The social system shows us internal and
external adaptation issues to its environment and the need to resolve them if the system continues its
course.
These problems are mainly from external changes in society's biological and ecological environment
and the internal environment created by the progress and differentiation of societies.
Spencer suggested three general functional basics for superorganisms that are similar to organisms.
Superorganism is itself required to meet needs for producing materials that sustain
superorganism. It includes the reproduction of both the individual organisms like people and the
social structures and culture of superorganisms that manage and regulate the activities of the
people.

6. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 6
Ability to control and coordinate people and structures related to their lives by consolidating
power and developing cultural systems like values, laws, and beliefs.
Information about the territories, circulation, or movement of the people, resources, and
structures of the superorganisms.
As the population increase, there is a requisite to produce more food to sustain the larger population.
Therefore, it results in the creation of structures within the economy that increases differentiation. It
will inevitably increase the development of new distributive infrastructures like roads, bridges, and
transportation systems.
Emile Durkheim and Functionalism
In correlation with Spencer’s theory of differentiation, Durkheim also emphasized the relationship
between population growth and structural differentiation. Durkheim believed that as time passes,
mechanisms of integration would eventually evolve along with differentiation.
Durkheim stood more with Comte than Spencer to emphasize the importance of cultural mechanisms
as a unifying force. He considered culture as necessary in the evolution of law to regulate and
coordinate relations within and among social units.
Durkheim extended Comte’s ideas and brought functionalism a perception of culture as essential to
meet the necessity of integration in complex social systems and institutions.
The Transition into Modern Functionalism
All early functionalist theories focused on the evolutionary framework. The principal idea was evolving
from a simple to a complex social system.
Complex societies were seen as progressive societies, and primitive ones were seen as inferior.
Charles Darwin's survival of fittest theory was interpreted to justify racism.
Functionalism was slowly disregarded. Functionalism started to find a new home in anthropology,
where it developed as a theory.
Anthropology and Functionalism
Anthropologists cherished the evolutionary method as it provided the data on preliterate societies.
Renowned anthropologists Bronislaw Malinowski and A.R. Radcliffe Brown played an essential role in
the Functionalism school of thought that emerged in the early twentieth century. The organic analogy
principle is used in anthropology to analyse different parts of society.

7. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 7
Bronislaw Malinowski and Functionalism
He is considered a prominent anthropologist and one of the founding fathers of social anthropology.
Malinowski emphasized the historical study of society and social institutions rather than speculative
study. His work started gaining attention in the 1930s. He laid importance on studying social behavior
through participant observation.
Malinowski's significant contributions are kinship, marriage, magic, ritual language, myth, and the
idea of reciprocity. According to Malinowski, a researcher should be able to speak the local language.
Furthermore, the researcher should respect the community's customs, culture, and laws. His research
about Trobriand's social life laid the foundation of anthropology.
According to Malinowski, customs and institutions in society are integrated and interconnected. If a
change happens in one part, it will result in a change in other parts. So for a holistic study, social
anthropologists and ethnographers should consider other parts of the whole also.
Another central area of study for Malinowski is needs functionalism. Human beings have a set of
universal biological needs. To fulfill those needs, various customs and institutions are developed.
Alfred Reginald Radcliffe Brown and Functionalism
Radcliffe Brown was influenced by the French sociological school of social phenomena. According to
his analysis of the kinship system among the preliterate, the issues related to functionalism could be
resolved in three steps.
Any society should have a certain basic level of integration within its parts.
The concept of function refers to the requisites for the existence of a society. It highlights the
necessity for integration.
Everyone should look for characteristics that can be displayed for the continuance of integration.
The target of explanation by functionalists is to find out how to achieve integration.
He redefined the concept of 'need' and altered it with certain primary factors required for human
societies' existence. He assumes that the required conditions can be discovered by scientific thought
and inquiry. This concept of Radcliffe Brown is an evident influence from Auguste Comte.
Along with Brown's variant of functionalism, a new concept of structure emerged. Structure refers to
the orderly arrangement of parts, and function refers to interlinking the structure of an organism. In
society, social structure is the orderly arrangement of individuals and social groups.
Social function refers to the internal networks between social life and structures. Therefore, both
function and structure are logically linked and support each other and necessary for each other's

8. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 8
continuity.
Talcott Parson and Functionalism
The theory put forward by Parson in many aspects is a revamp of Durkheim, Spencer, and
Malinowski’s functionalist ideas. Order in society is the primary area of concern of Parson. Cultural
factors in social interaction and social relationships motivate individuals to look for sanction in social
relationships.
Parson System of Social Action
According to Parson, societal functions or activities are directed by three systems of social action.
Personality system: Humans put forward efforts and performs specific actions. To fulfil the
conditions required for action, man has to put forward some efforts. Each situation has a particular
meaning, and they are provided symbol and symptoms accordingly.
Cultural system: As soon as social action cultivates symbols and signs, they obtain an ordinary
meaning. It also evolves as an outcome of a systematised system. A particular situation develops
when specific individuals perform a certain set of actions.
Social System: When a limited number of physical and environmental attributes are involved, and
many individuals interact with each other, there is a tendency for the gratification of each other in
different situations.
Pattern Variables
Talcott Parson developed a few variables that can be applied to understand different social systems.
It includes normative necessities in social systems, classifying modes of direction in personality-based
systems and value patterns of culture. According to Parson, social institutions, social subsystems,
values, and norms can be classified according to patterned variables.
The pattern variables are
1 . Affectivity and Affective Neutrality
Neutrality is the expected amount of emotion required for a particular interaction. Particularism is
related to affectivity. At the same time, individuals in bureaucracy may lack emotion while in contact
with other individuals, which can be associated with effective neutrality. Affective neutrality is
deferment of gratification and affectivity refers to the display of gratification of emotions.

9. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 9
2 . Collectivity or Self
When individuals are after collective action, then collectivity precedes individuality. Actions such as
the self-sacrifice of a soldier during war and charity activities comes under collectivity. In contrast,
utilitarianism considers egoism and individualism as the foundation for building social analysis.
3 . Particularism and Universalism
In particularism, the relation is with a specific individual. The relationships are particular and very
diffuse in a parent-child relationship, a relationship among siblings and friends.
It is different and opposite in universalism. Bureaucracy is an example of universalism. As dictated by
law public should be treated impartially and equally. A bureaucrat cannot be partial even to a family
member.
4 . Diffuseness and Specificity
It is related to how narrow and broad our role is in interaction. In a formal setup visiting a dentist is a
precise social relationship.
This kind of approach to someone for a particular purpose is specificity. Diffusion and related social
interaction are different. We rely on friends for broad areas of interests like support, conversation and
daily activities.
5 . Ascription and Achievement
Ascription is the attributes that a person attains since birth. It includes sex, race, age, ethnicity, and
family status. Achievement is the attainment of a position concerning the hard work and performance
of the individual. Ascribed status is rigid, while achieved status is open to all.
6 . Expressive and Instrumental
The integrative and tension factors are the expressive aspects.
These are individuals, especially women, and their role concerning their family unit. The instrumental
features are the goal attainment and adaptation factors. These are related to social action and status
related to male roles, the economy, or politics.
Societal interaction in early societies is regarded as expressive characteristics. However, in modern
societies with complex labour and differentiation divisions, societal interaction is considered
instrumental aspects.
AGIL paradigm and Functionalism
Every social system has specific functional needs for survival and continuation, and these functional
needs can be remembered using the acronym AGIL.

10. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 10
Adaptation (A)
Every social system lives in its environment, and it must learn to live along with this environment.
While adapting to the environment, the environment itself is affected and is reciprocally adapted to
society. Earning an income for the family is a kind of adaptation in the family.
Goal Attainment (G)
Every system has certain specific goals related to it. These goals must be laid out, defined, and then
achieved. The polity of a state can alter and organize the goals of a society. The state bureaucracy is
the medium that acts in attaining the goals.
For example, Harvard University has the goal of teaching, research, and sharing knowledge. Business,
political, economic, social, and cultural organizations worldwide have goals, and within these
organizations, there are positions attributed to specific individuals to achieve these goals.
Integration (I)
According to Parson, integration, coordination adjustment, and regulation among different actors in
the system assist social relationships and interrelationships to continue to function.
As social processes develop, conflict and strain also emerge along with it. Various social institutions
assist in orderly means of carrying out activities and managing conflict and tensions. Parson believed
that the system itself generates an automatic integration method.
Latency (L) or pattern maintenance (P)
It is the pattern maintenance and cultural motivational energy for the actors involved in the system.
They are called Latent because they may not always seem like A, G, and I functions.
It is necessary to establish this motivation and renew it constantly. Family, religion, and educational
institutions solve this issue of pattern management.
Criticism of Functionalism
The major criticisms of functionalism are
The primary issue put forward by scientific philosopher’s and logicians are illegitimate
tautologies and teleologies.
Some of the contemporary families in the society might be categorized as dysfunctional by
Parsons as it is not performing the functions designated by Parsons.
Functionalism functions as a conservative ideology that lays lower importance for issues like
inequality and conflict and focusing majorly on the factors that help in sustaining the status quo.
Over prominence for issue concerning analytical categories and not in principles that help in

11. Sociology
Socius and Logos
Functionalism
https://sociology.plus/functionalism/
Page: 11
explaining dynamic processes.
Marxist and Feminist theorists, who are the significant chunk of conflict theory of sociology,
rejects functionalism theories for their biased approach. They criticize the theory of Parson, which
supports traditional nuclear families which oppress women and side-line them as housewives.
Functionalist theorists are blind to issues like domestic violence. Functionalists argue that nuclear
families are efficient for socialization. Feminists argue that even single parents run the family well and
socialize children.
Interactionists consider functionalism as deterministic theory. According to functionalist’s human
behaviour is formulated by societal structures and institutions. Interactionists believe human beings
as not anyone’s puppet, and the concept of human beings programmed by social forces in
functionalism is wrong.
By the late 1980s, functionalism was abandoned and replaced with new non-functionalist approaches
to the progress of sociology. A few contemporary sociologists like Jeffrey C. Alexander have attempted
to revive functionalism.