A fun thought that, if you believe in it, shows how everything begins. But you'll have to figure out the details from here on your own - otherwise it's no fun :)
The Quantum Mind: Panpsychism, Physics, and ConsciousnessJed Stamas
Panpsychism, or neutral monism, is the idea that there is only one kind of stuff: light/matter/energy/proto-consciousness. Quantum mechanics says that atoms and photons exist in a probability state if they are not being observed. Quantum physics supports panpsychism.
The Quantum Mind: Panpsychism, Physics, and ConsciousnessJed Stamas
Panpsychism, or neutral monism, is the idea that there is only one kind of stuff: light/matter/energy/proto-consciousness. Quantum mechanics says that atoms and photons exist in a probability state if they are not being observed. Quantum physics supports panpsychism.
A run through of the basic principles of quantum mechanics, first principles in Philosophy, deriving mathematical Platonism and informational monism, and recognizing that quantum gravity necessitates informational monism while accommodating mathematical Platonism.
In Causality Principle as the Framework to Contextualize Time in Modern Physicsinventionjournals
Since the moment Boethius meditated on the nature of time in his fifth book on The Consolation of Philosophy, we have more tools to reflect on the subject. The onset of relativity and quantum physics provides us with the best insight, to date, that guides our reflections on the philosophical debates that attempt to theorize a definition of time. To clearly address the problems related to the theoretical models that account for the nature of time, adjustments to our interpretation of the contextual issues involved in special relativity are in order if we are going to preserve our notion of causal reality. As the construction of string theory emerges as the reigning theory for quantum gravity, a precise picture of causal reality can be accounted for through theories such as Dyson’s Chronological Protection Agency, Hořava’s theory of gravity, and new insight to how simultaneity is interpreted in relativity theory. With this model, the question about time in the philosophical debates can now be clearly defined through the Presentists’ view of the universe. Thus, if we are going to accept the premise of quantum mechanics (QM) and the theory of relativity, we can safely say that string theory (ST) is a reasonable theory of quantum gravity and that its conclusions about time must be taken seriously.
Dear readers, as far as I'm concerned "THE CHAOS THEORY" is EXPLICITABLE WITH A SEQUENCE OF FEW IMAGES (THAT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS CAN NOT EXPLICATE IN THIS CONTEXT), EVERY way by pointing out faulty sources, I will try, to follow, to describe some in formation about IT.
"God’s dice" is a qubit: They need an infinite set of different symbols for all sides of them
INTRODUCTION
I A SKETCH OF THE PROOF OF THE THESIS
II GLEASON’S THEOREM (1957) AND THE THESIS
III GOD’S DIE, GLEASON’S THEOREM AND AN IDEA FOR A SHORT PROOF OF FERMAT’S LAST THEOREM
IV INTERPRETATION OF THE THESIS
V GOD’S DICE (A QUBIT) AS A LAW OF CONSERVATION AND TRANSFORMATION
VI CONCLUSION
A run through of the basic principles of quantum mechanics, first principles in Philosophy, deriving mathematical Platonism and informational monism, and recognizing that quantum gravity necessitates informational monism while accommodating mathematical Platonism.
In Causality Principle as the Framework to Contextualize Time in Modern Physicsinventionjournals
Since the moment Boethius meditated on the nature of time in his fifth book on The Consolation of Philosophy, we have more tools to reflect on the subject. The onset of relativity and quantum physics provides us with the best insight, to date, that guides our reflections on the philosophical debates that attempt to theorize a definition of time. To clearly address the problems related to the theoretical models that account for the nature of time, adjustments to our interpretation of the contextual issues involved in special relativity are in order if we are going to preserve our notion of causal reality. As the construction of string theory emerges as the reigning theory for quantum gravity, a precise picture of causal reality can be accounted for through theories such as Dyson’s Chronological Protection Agency, Hořava’s theory of gravity, and new insight to how simultaneity is interpreted in relativity theory. With this model, the question about time in the philosophical debates can now be clearly defined through the Presentists’ view of the universe. Thus, if we are going to accept the premise of quantum mechanics (QM) and the theory of relativity, we can safely say that string theory (ST) is a reasonable theory of quantum gravity and that its conclusions about time must be taken seriously.
Dear readers, as far as I'm concerned "THE CHAOS THEORY" is EXPLICITABLE WITH A SEQUENCE OF FEW IMAGES (THAT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS CAN NOT EXPLICATE IN THIS CONTEXT), EVERY way by pointing out faulty sources, I will try, to follow, to describe some in formation about IT.
"God’s dice" is a qubit: They need an infinite set of different symbols for all sides of them
INTRODUCTION
I A SKETCH OF THE PROOF OF THE THESIS
II GLEASON’S THEOREM (1957) AND THE THESIS
III GOD’S DIE, GLEASON’S THEOREM AND AN IDEA FOR A SHORT PROOF OF FERMAT’S LAST THEOREM
IV INTERPRETATION OF THE THESIS
V GOD’S DICE (A QUBIT) AS A LAW OF CONSERVATION AND TRANSFORMATION
VI CONCLUSION
AC Milan 1-2 Juventus, vòng 32 Serie A. Hai đội bóng giàu truyền thống bậc nhất xứ sở mỳ ống đã cống hiến một trận đấu hấp dẫn tại Milano dù rằng vị thế của 2 đội hiện tại hoàn toàn khác nhau.
An Analysis of the Phenomena That Have Led Some Philosophers to Introduce the...inventionjournals
The standpoint that all observable phenomena in the universe are fitting inestimable material for science if they are studied by the scientific method is basically positivistic. All things and facts which can be immediately learned by observation, together with their relationship and uniformities which is discoverable by reason without exceeding the limit of empirical observation, are designated as positivism. In positivism the belief in the sensory observation of empirical phenomena, that is empiricism – therefore plays a predominant part. Methodologically therefore positivism is in controversial opposition to the metaphysical abstraction of traditional of traditional philosophy. The term metaphysical is applied to everything that aims to go beyond the sphere of empiricism and seek the hidden essence of phenomena or the ultimate cause of things
Clearly, there is a political crisis in hand in America and elsewhere. Its root cause is worldview polarization between religion and science; its disease is elitism; and its cure is the worldview integration of spirituality and science that the quantum worldview facilitates. Explore the intriguing connection between quantum physics and quantum politics in this thought-provoking article.
Equation of everything i.e. Quantum Fields: the Real Building Blocks of the U...inventionjournals
Mind, the inner most box of nature has not been investigated by modern physicists .Mind has not been incorporated in Standard model. Mind can only be studied by participatory science. Having searched Basic building blocks of the universe i.e. mass part of reality, we have also investigated mind part of reality and finally two fundamental particles with mind and mass realities are hypothesized . Now we discuss how to further investigate mind so as to know their structures and functions. Atomic genetics is the branch of science where we investigate about fundamental interactions of the universe i.e. atomic transcription and translations. New words have been coined to understand hidden science of mind part of reality. Mind reality have been recognized as different faces by “I” about 5000 years back to Arjuna in Mahabharata. It is just like to understand any language through Alphabets. These are (different faces) Alphabets of mind reality. One Mind reality has one face identity and the second mind reality has second face identity and so on. The facial expression represents phenomenon of intelligence and different face represents different types of properties carrying property. The open eyes means property is activated while close eye means property is inactivated. In spite of carrying properties conscious ness they also know how to conduct not only origin of universe but also how to create two different universe i.e. next creation could be different from this creation. In all, It is automatic system of the universe. The mind realities which are of good properties have devtas face identity (first five faces on both side and those mind realities which are of bad properties have demons face identity ( last four faces on both side) . These are named as code PCPs or messenger atomic genes. The central face is CCP or Thought script where all thoughts of the universe are banked. It is bank of data of all information s of the universe It is face identity of Anti mind particles as data of all information’s of the universe are stored as anti mind particles . It is the Time mind ness (biological clock) that keeps on expressing different thoughts from this thought script (CCP). There are four more faces (black bodies) shown on extreme left and right floating in fire are CPs (translating Atomic genes). That translates the messages and realizes it and reacts accordingly. Rest pictures are creation of different individuals and nature (sun, moon and snake and other pictures made on hands and body) by different thoughts of Almighty B.B.B. The entire picture has been explained in Geeta in 11/ 10 and 11.Whatever is being created in this universe is basically not by our thoughts rather it is the thought of Almighty B.B.B (Yang B.B.B or matter B.B.B. or Male B.B.B working as Highest center of the universe. ) that is dominated over creation and destruction of this cycle of the universe. Hence the World of Everyday Experience, in One Equation is Myth.
Put your Hands on the Plough: And Never Look BackPeter Anyebe
Given a paradigm shift in which there are four, 4 realms of existence that include spirit, soul, mind, and matter rather than the current one, 1 realm that includes only matter; the possibility of causal openness and closure become apparent.
Thus energy exists in all four, 4 realms, but in different forms, to describe an open system that allows the free movement of energy between the realms.
In the spirit it is an idea, in the mind it is objectivity, in matter it is procedure, and in the soul, power.
But the system is also closed, to the extent that it obeys reciprocity, continuity, and conservation, for maturity.
Dear readers, as far as I'm concerned "THE CHAOS THEORY" is EXPLICITABLE WITH A SEQUENCE OF FEW IMAGES (THAT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS CAN NOT EXPLICATE IN THIS CONTEXT), EVERY way by pointing out faulty sources, I will try, to follow, to describe some in formation about IT.
***THE SEQUENCE***
This is a line of images "to explain the concept of the THEORY OF CHAOS". I used the few images I can post but the sequence is:
1) "New York -double 666">
2)" New York -The light of Leonardo ">
3)" Honduras-New Haven researcher who invited me to Cape Canaveral to see the launch of the Shuttle where it was also her work">
4)" Explosion of the same Shuttle ">
5)" New York -Tetragrammatron in reference to the Kabbalah "> from image 6 to image 14 >>> repetition of the concept
This website stores and accesses information on your device, such as cookies. Personal data may be processed, such as cookie identifiers, unique device identifiers, and browser information. Third parties may store and access information on your device and process this personal data. You may change or withdraw your preferences by clicking on the cookie icon or link; however, as a consequence, you may not see relevant ads or personalised content. You may change your settings at any time or accept the default settings. You may close this banner to continue with only essential cookie
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptxMAGOTI ERNEST
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
2. SUMMARY: A set of three logical laws underlies the foundations of everything, describing
dependent and independent existence and giving rise to math via the concept of quantity.
A)
B)
C)
In English:
A) If there exists A then
there exists B
B) There exists C
C) It will always be that if
there exists A and B or
if there exists A or B,
then there exists C
à∃A
⊃
∃B
∃C
(à(∃(A
B))
⟥
∧
∨
à(∃(A
B)))
∨
⊃
∃C
A = 2
Note:
∃=
1
unit
of
quan4ty
B = 1 C = 3
A = 2
B = 1
C = 3
a = 3
b = 4
c = 5
3. This presentation is a fun thought exercise built from
the ground up, paying no Mind to what is considered
acceptable or not by what science and philosophy have
said throughout the past. The world used to be flat,
and the sun used to spin around us, so every now and
then it’s good to throw all assumed knowledge out the
window.
This presentation exists solely to spark new thoughts,
and is purposely incomplete by nature because – hey –
what fun is a riddle if you’re given all the answers
straight up? J
4. If the assumption is taken that consciousness exists at a
fundamental level, it must be placed into the same
scientific hierarchy encompassing the ontology of the Unity
of Science. Just assume it exists.
Consciousness
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Essentially, all sciences above basic biology are in the scientific realm of consciousness,
as they are the study of the conscious behavior of higher animals and human beings.
But it is all connected, starting from the bottom. There was no “sudden leap” where
things appeared out of thin air, unentangled with the ontological layers below.
5. We can expand on the ontology to see how the different
parts are connected in their functions. The connection is
important, since each realm needs the others to exist.
Realm Form
Consciousness Force
Biology Matter
Chemistry Matter
Physics Force
Placing all matter into the realms of chemistry and biology is a
semantic question. We could also say that basic particles belong
to physics and their compounds in chemistry and biology. But
that’s semantics, let’s go with the above for simplicity.
6. Every force needs an equal and opposing force. At a
primary level, fundamental consciousness confirms the
existence of physical forces.
Realm Form
Consciousness Force
Biology Matter
Chemistry Matter
Physics Force
After all, if there were nothing conscious around the Universe
anywhere, would the initial physical force exist in the first place,
and would any of this be relevant in any shape or form? Sounds
silly to us. But we’ll get to existence soon.
Example: a physical force
needs matter to be
transmitted…
…and the receiving conscious
force needs matter to decode
the message. At the
fundamental level, this is a
gravitational wave shifting
spacetime itself. The other
way, it’s fully coherent light in
the form of a laser zapping
straight through it.
7. Everything is connected in science, so we can expand on
the ontology to consider how the realms interact. To
consider how everything is connected, remember the
importance of quantum entanglement and how space-time
rips apart without it at a certain point. Google them, as
these are very important pieces of knowledge.
Realm Form Language
Consciousness Force ???
Biology Matter Laws of biology
Chemistry Matter Laws of chemistry
Physics Force Laws of physics
The natural laws can all be interpreted in the conscious realm.
On a fundamental level, the Universal language is
mathematics, which is how we make sense of the natural laws.
8. But if everything is connected, would it not suggest that
there must be an underlying foundation from which the
common languages of natural laws are born? And how are
they propagated?
9. The mediums to propagate one force to the other are
visible throughout nature.
Realm Form Propagation Language
Consciousness Force Forces of Logic ???
Biology Matter Biological
compounds
Laws of biology
Chemistry Matter Chemical
compounds
Laws of chemistry
Physics Force Forces of Physics Laws of physics
Matter is simply the medium for the delivery of forces.
10. The propagation and language of consciousness requires
more focus. Since everything is connected in the
framework of science, and we understand everything
through mathematics and logic, these should be
fundamentally connected.
Realm Form Propagation Language
Consciousness Force Logical forces ???
Biology Matter Biological
compounds
Laws of biology
Chemistry Matter Chemical
compounds
Laws of chemistry
Physics Force Physical forces Laws of physics
What are the foundations for keeping the above connected?
Or, perhaps a better term, entangled?
11. As conscious beings, the human mind must be of use to
understand the connection of everything that we perceive.
The physical Universe creates us, but for it to exist in any
relevant sense to us, we must, in turn, create it through our
perception.
12. Reality
System-1 could be viewed as the involuntary result of physical
evolution (reality), whereas system-2 drives the voluntary rational
perception of everything evolution has delivered for us and what
we’d like to turn the future into (perception and imagination)
Dual system theory paints a picture of the human mind
where system-1 governs our involuntary/intuitive action
and system-2 our voluntary/rational action
Perception
and
imagination
13. Reality
In short, our consciousness conjures our perception of reality at any instant and our imagination
helps shape it towards our liking in the future. Reality has created us at this instant, but we create it
through our collective perception of it at the same instant. By exercising free will, we shape reality
towards our liking, and this defines the future. The future is probabilistic based on natural and
conscious tendencies – determinism (past) and indeterminism (future) are the two extremes.
Reality is the end result of physical evolution, static at any instant. But as
conscious beings are born and mature, our perception and imagination have an
impact on reality through the choices that we make. Again – just go with the
thought that consciousness is fundamental. We can’t prove it, neither can you, so
just go with it.
Perception
and
imagination
14. …and perceived by conscious forces, creating each other. The
next instant is shaped by the sum of actions of conscious forces
impacting in the physical realm in an endless back-and-forth of
continuous creation.
At every instant, the reality around us is created
constructively from physical forces…
Realm
Consciousness
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Realm
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Consciousness
15. If this dual nature of constant creation of instants holds,
then we still face the question posed earlier: what holds it
all together, how is it all entangled?
Realm
Consciousness
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Realm
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Consciousness
16. If we are conscious, entangled into the fabric of the
Universe by some common foundation, then we should
return to where we are most likely to understand this
foundation: our perception of the Universe.
Theoretically two humans could be in “perfect agreement” if they had the exact same
life experience to acquire an identical set of cognitive knowledge and emotional
affect. Of course, we are always at some incomplete level of agreement in reality, but
theoretically perfect agreement could exist.
Understanding = cognition + affect
17. If two humans understand each other perfectly, is it not the
same as, say, the fusion of two atoms that do so perfectly
naturally? There is a natural logic to the fusion of two
atoms, and a language to describe it. Humans argue with
logic, and communicate in a human language, but the
underlying premise is no different when they come
together in a theoretically perfect conscious agreement.
18. Realm Form Propagation Language
Consciousness Force Logical forces ???
Biology Matter Biological
compounds
Laws of biology
Chemistry Matter Chemical
compounds
Laws of chemistry
Physics Force Physical forces Laws of physics
The foundations of logic and math would lead to the
theoretic possibility of perfect conscious agreement
19. If we are to consider a foundational combination of logic
and math, it must start with the most fundamental of
questions: existence. We hold that existence can only be
considered as a belief system with two parts:
Essentially, this says that existence needs to consider
dependence and independence. Can something exist without
the existence of something else? What would verify it? Can
something exist independently? Can it verify itself?
1) Do you believe in the existence of yourself?
2) Do you believe in the existence of everyone and everything
around you?
20. Let us try and codify dependence and independence:
For the term “dependent” to exist, it must leave room for the
term “independent” to exist as well. One cannot exist without
the other, as otherwise “dependent” would itself be
“independent”.
a) IF there exists A THEN there exists B
(definition of dependence and its verification by its two parts A
and B)
b) there exists C
(definition of independence)
c) it will always be such that IF there exists A AND B or IF there
exists A OR B THEN there exists C
(verification of independence by its one part C – C exists under
all conditions and, thus, is effectively independent)
21. Let us consider the steps used to build a, b, and c:
There is a clear paradox with the independence of C – it actually needs
A and/or B to exist. But it is practically independent once it has come to
be. This suggests that the default “Universal setting” is to believe in
existence and say that A exists, which leads to C.
a) IF there exists A THEN there exists B
(definition of dependence and its verification by its two parts A
and B)
b) there exists C
(definition of independence)
c) it will always be such that IF there exists A AND B or IF there
exists A OR B THEN there exists C
(verification of independence by its one part C)
We must start with IF, since existence is fundamentally based on belief of it. As we define the existence of A we
define the dependent existence of B. This defines the parts A and B within (a), but also the same logic suggests the
mandatory existence of another logical law (b)
As (a) defined the concept of dependence, we must also define the concept of independence. They must both
exist, since otherwise dependence itself would be independent. If we started with independence in a) we would
get nowhere.
The logical law (b) defines the part C but also logically suggests the existence of the law (c). As we are defining
dependence and independence, the last step needed is for the part C to verify its own existence under all
conditions, which makes it effectively independent.
22. Let us consider a visual representation in the context of
one thing we can be sure of in life – a beginning A, the
present B, and an end C (or any general outcome):
A
B
C
Life overall Eg.
Conception
A AND B
C
A OR B
C
Eg. Goal-setting. OR
means you get to
choose and exercise
free-will, ie. Stay put
or set a new target to
advance towards
23. Logic needs to contain elements of math for this to extend
to the ontology. We cannot elude that “there exists” is
called an “existential quantifier”.
Quantity suggests numbers, so let’s assume that every
existential quantifier used gets one “unit of quantity”. We
are very aware that we are stretching existing definitions,
but why not when discussing existence itself? What else
would give birth to quantity than existence itself?
24. Let us assign units to the below:
a) IF there exists A THEN there exists B
(two existential quantifiers means two units of quantity, a = 2)
b) there exists C
(one existential quantifier means one unit of quantity, b = 1)
c) it will always be such that IF there exists A AND B or IF there exists A OR B THEN there exists C
(three existential quantifiers means three units of quantity, c = 3)
2 + 1 = 3 == a + b = c
(trust us, this came from building up from first principles of independence and dependence first,
instead of being a “forced move”. There was a genuine “that’s funny..” moment here. Minsky said
there was logic underneath it all.)
25. So how does this fit into the ontology described
earlier?
Realm Form Propagation Language
Consciousness Force Logical forces ???
Biology Matter Biological
compounds
Laws of biology
Chemistry Matter Chemical
compounds
Laws of chemistry
Physics Force Physical forces Laws of physics
A = 2 B = 1 C = 3
26. Does physics describe mass and forces related to it, such
as the recently confirmed gravitational waves? Or is mass,
in itself, actually a force (well.. Part of it at least),
represented by matter?
A = 2 B = 1 C = 3
28. Does biology describe the systemic “network-building” of
mass to keep it all from collapsing together immediately?
A = 2
B = 1
C = 3
29. And do the combination of the aforementioned allow you
to play funny tricks like this to (perhaps) provide a logically
constructed proof of Pythagoras’ Theorem, the most
proven thing in mathematics?
A = 2
B = 1
C = 3
a = 3
b = 4
c = 5
30. Isn’t there a certain type of mechanics that talks about ‘spin’ all the time? Maybe it isn’t
found underneath physics, but at the exact opposite end of science (see earlier ontology
slides? Could you draw a perfect circle using all the aforementioned, if A, B, and C are
spinning?
A = 2
B = 1
C = 3
a = 3
b = 4
c = 5
31. If the set of three logical laws of existence could work, then
their negation exists as well. So reality.. And imagination..
In a dual system, confirming each other’s existence with
every outcome C being an outcome in reality? Spinning
round and round? Think about it, and have fun J
Reality & the
physical realm
Consciousness
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Imagination &
Perception
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Consciousness