fb_b9014243.pdf
•
0 likes•20 views
The student was awarded a mark of 65 for their report. Their literature search was good but lacked some technical details. They had a limited search strategy missing some key elements. Very few sources were found, making it difficult to evaluate their search approach. Their introduction provided a wide background on the pathogens, disease outcomes, epidemiology, and risk factors. They included a good range of standard and prevention techniques but their discussion of novel strategies lacked molecular details. Overall their report was well structured and presented with a good range of carefully selected and cited sources.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
fb_b9038960.pdf
This document provides a summary of a student assignment on a disease pathogen. The student received an overall mark of 68. Their literature search and search strategy were adequate but lacked full encompassment. They provided an excellent introduction covering the pathogen, disease outcomes, epidemiology, and risk factors. Their figures on virulence factors and host defense mechanisms included excellent detail and integration of evidence. They provided excellent descriptions of standard treatment and prevention techniques but lacked detail on treatment failure and new prevention strategies. The referencing and use of sources was good but some sources were superseded and too many were secondary.
fb_b9008621(1).pdf
The student received a mark of 62 for their report. While some sections of the report provided good detail and discussion, other key elements were missing or superficial. The literature search and selection of sources had limitations. The description of treatment options and prevention strategies was adequate but lacked important details in places. Overall the report was well structured and integrated sources well.
CPI feedback
The student received a mark of 58 for their module on CPI 2020. Their literature search and selection of sources had some limitations. They provided an adequate introduction to the pathogens and epidemiology of the disease, but discussion of risk factors and disease outcomes was limited. They included good details on some virulence and host defense mechanisms, but more could have been covered. Standard therapy was described well, but resistance, novel treatments, and prevention strategies received only superficial coverage. The report structure and referencing had minor issues.
ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx
ACC202 - Management Accounting
Trimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Question
Student Mark
Total Assignment
/100
Assessment Mark (out of 20)
/20
Overview
Group Assignment: 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor)
Nature of Assignment: Essay (2000 – 2500 words)
Date Due: Week 10(Friday 10pm)
Worth: 20%
Submission Method: via Moodle / Turnitin (printed copy to Tutor if requested by Tutor)
Instructions
· This is a Group Assignment of 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor). The groups must be finalised prior to the Mid-trimester test in Week 6.
· Write each of your Student Names and Numbers at the top of this page IN THE BOX PROVIDED. Ensure you identify who your group lead is.
The Group lead will be responsible for all correspondence with the Tutor as well as the assignment final submission.
1) Essay Questions:
What are mid-market innovators and what are the overall strategies and pricing approaches used by these innovators in order to develop their business. Why are mid-market innovators successful? Provide examples where appropriate.
Based on your analysis of mid-market innovators in the first part of the essay question, what challenges are there for incumbent companies?
2) Essay Structure:
The following structure is provided to assist you in developing your response.
1) Executive Summary (an overall statement of no more than 200-250 words outlining the topic, approach, summary of key findings and conclusion)
2) Introduction (this should state what the purpose of the report is, what Accounting theme is being explored, which company is being reviewed (if applicable), which standards / criteria are being applied etc.)
3) Literature Review (this is where you include a summary of the literature you reviewed to develop your understanding of the topic and formulate your recommendations)
4) Analysis (this is the main body)
5) Summary of Findings (this section highlights the key findings from your analysis)
6) Recommendations (this section summarises YOUR key recommendations based on your findings and emphasises your JUDGEMENT)
7) Conclusion (this section should reflect upon what you stated in the introduction i.e. what you have done and what you found. The conclusion is about closing the analysis and NOT introducing new material.)
8) Referencing (Harvard Anglia compliant)
You should also use the attached RUBRIC (refer section 3) to self-assess how well your Essay reaches the targeted outcomes. Please feel free to bring a draft copy to your Tutor to help you assess progress.
3. Analysis Rubric
Criteria
HD (>95%)
HD (85-95%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (40-50%)
Fail (<40%)
Executive Summary (5%)
Presented a logical and well-structured executive summary which clearly reflects the assignment requirements, .
EBM Therapy Appraisal Template F1
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising a journal article on therapy using the Sudan Evidence-Based Medicine Association template. It includes developing a well-built clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), outlining the current practice and selecting a research article to appraise. The template guides the user through appraising the relevance, validity, results, and applicability of the selected article using the RVRA scheme. It also provides guidance on applying the findings to resolve the original clinical question and determining if changes to practice are warranted.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
What shaped Western culture in the period 1300–1550 more the Blac.docx
What shaped Western culture in the period 1300–1550 more: the Black Death’s emphasis on the afterlife (the hereafter) or the Renaissance’s emphasis on human achievement (the here and now)?
Start with a statement identifying your choice; this is your thesis. Then, support your choice with specific examples from at least three of the following categories:
· significant individuals (e.g., political or religious leaders, innovators, explorers);
· characteristics of worldview (e.g., philosophy, religion);
· social institutions (e.g., social mores, practices, hierarchies);
· patronage (discuss the patrons, their motives, influence, and resulting products or artifacts);
· the economies (e.g., changes, different economic systems, impact); and
· politics (e.g., forms of governance, power distributions, contests).
This assignment provides you with an opportunity to practice prioritizing and using specific data to support your choice. Your example may touch on several of the above categories at once, but there should be at minimum three separate examples for which their connection to your choice is explained.
Your essay must be a minimum of 500 words. Be sure to include an introduction; if necessary, review the Unit III Scholarly Activity instructions, which explain how to draft an introduction.
You must use two sources written by historians in history books or journals from the CSU Online Library in addition to the textbook and the study guide. All content must follow APA guidelines, including all sources used, which must be cited and referenced according to APA standards.
Benchmark - Research Proposal
write a Research Proposal (2,000-2,500 words) on a topic relevant to the course. To complete the Research Proposal, do the following:
Review the attached document "Research Proposal Guidelines", as well as the rubric all attached to " complete the assignment.
1. Introductory section: Include hypothesis and a review of the literature.
2. Method section: Include subsections on Participants, Apparatus/Materials/Instruments, Procedure, and Design.
3. Results section: Include statistic, critical values, degrees of freedom, and alpha level.
4. Discussion section: Include interpretation of results, ethical concerns, limitations of study, and suggestions for future research.
5. Figures and Tables section: Include a minimum of two (either two figures, two tables, or a figure and a table).
Include at least 8-10 scholarly references.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Benchmark - Research Proposal
write a Research Proposal (2,000-2,500 words) on a topic relevant to the course. To complete the Research Proposal, do the following:
Review the attached document "Research Proposal Guidelines", as well as the rubric all attached to " complete the assignment.
1. Introductory section: Include hypothesis and a review of the literature.
2. Method ...
Recommended
fb_b9038960.pdf
This document provides a summary of a student assignment on a disease pathogen. The student received an overall mark of 68. Their literature search and search strategy were adequate but lacked full encompassment. They provided an excellent introduction covering the pathogen, disease outcomes, epidemiology, and risk factors. Their figures on virulence factors and host defense mechanisms included excellent detail and integration of evidence. They provided excellent descriptions of standard treatment and prevention techniques but lacked detail on treatment failure and new prevention strategies. The referencing and use of sources was good but some sources were superseded and too many were secondary.
fb_b9008621(1).pdf
The student received a mark of 62 for their report. While some sections of the report provided good detail and discussion, other key elements were missing or superficial. The literature search and selection of sources had limitations. The description of treatment options and prevention strategies was adequate but lacked important details in places. Overall the report was well structured and integrated sources well.
CPI feedback
The student received a mark of 58 for their module on CPI 2020. Their literature search and selection of sources had some limitations. They provided an adequate introduction to the pathogens and epidemiology of the disease, but discussion of risk factors and disease outcomes was limited. They included good details on some virulence and host defense mechanisms, but more could have been covered. Standard therapy was described well, but resistance, novel treatments, and prevention strategies received only superficial coverage. The report structure and referencing had minor issues.
ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx
ACC202 - Management Accounting
Trimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Question
Student Mark
Total Assignment
/100
Assessment Mark (out of 20)
/20
Overview
Group Assignment: 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor)
Nature of Assignment: Essay (2000 – 2500 words)
Date Due: Week 10(Friday 10pm)
Worth: 20%
Submission Method: via Moodle / Turnitin (printed copy to Tutor if requested by Tutor)
Instructions
· This is a Group Assignment of 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor). The groups must be finalised prior to the Mid-trimester test in Week 6.
· Write each of your Student Names and Numbers at the top of this page IN THE BOX PROVIDED. Ensure you identify who your group lead is.
The Group lead will be responsible for all correspondence with the Tutor as well as the assignment final submission.
1) Essay Questions:
What are mid-market innovators and what are the overall strategies and pricing approaches used by these innovators in order to develop their business. Why are mid-market innovators successful? Provide examples where appropriate.
Based on your analysis of mid-market innovators in the first part of the essay question, what challenges are there for incumbent companies?
2) Essay Structure:
The following structure is provided to assist you in developing your response.
1) Executive Summary (an overall statement of no more than 200-250 words outlining the topic, approach, summary of key findings and conclusion)
2) Introduction (this should state what the purpose of the report is, what Accounting theme is being explored, which company is being reviewed (if applicable), which standards / criteria are being applied etc.)
3) Literature Review (this is where you include a summary of the literature you reviewed to develop your understanding of the topic and formulate your recommendations)
4) Analysis (this is the main body)
5) Summary of Findings (this section highlights the key findings from your analysis)
6) Recommendations (this section summarises YOUR key recommendations based on your findings and emphasises your JUDGEMENT)
7) Conclusion (this section should reflect upon what you stated in the introduction i.e. what you have done and what you found. The conclusion is about closing the analysis and NOT introducing new material.)
8) Referencing (Harvard Anglia compliant)
You should also use the attached RUBRIC (refer section 3) to self-assess how well your Essay reaches the targeted outcomes. Please feel free to bring a draft copy to your Tutor to help you assess progress.
3. Analysis Rubric
Criteria
HD (>95%)
HD (85-95%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (40-50%)
Fail (<40%)
Executive Summary (5%)
Presented a logical and well-structured executive summary which clearly reflects the assignment requirements, .
EBM Therapy Appraisal Template F1
This document outlines the steps for critically appraising a journal article on therapy using the Sudan Evidence-Based Medicine Association template. It includes developing a well-built clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), outlining the current practice and selecting a research article to appraise. The template guides the user through appraising the relevance, validity, results, and applicability of the selected article using the RVRA scheme. It also provides guidance on applying the findings to resolve the original clinical question and determining if changes to practice are warranted.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
Task
Assignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks. Text material which may be relevant to the question may be drawn from any of text chapters 12, 13 and 14.
Question (10 marks)
Answer the following:
Why might an increase in government expenditure give rise to inflation?
Rationale
The question addresses the following learning outcome:
· be able to examine critically the health of the economy as a whole through the analysis of major economic variables and advise on likely policy alternatives.
Marking criteria
Learning objective: Academic writing and applying economic principles and theories to labour market issues.
High Distinction(85%+)
Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No major grammatical and spelling errors. All references, including recent literature, cited and used accurately.
Distinction (75%-84%)
Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style. No spelling errors, minor grammatical errors. Relevant references cited and used accurately.
Credit (65%-74%)
A satisfactory standard of expression. Relatively clear and concise in expression of ideas. Few spelling and/or grammar errors. Majority of references are presented and used accurately.
Pass (50%-64%)
Some inconsistency in sentence structure. Clarity of expression could be enhanced by some revision. Several spelling errors and/or poor grammar. Very limited references cited and used.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proof-reading. Too many spelling and/or grammar errors. References not included or inappropriately applied
Learning objective: Research, content & knowledge of topic by analysing conditions in the Australian labour market.
High Distinction(85%+)
Skilful use of data, theoretical knowledge and ongoing debate on the issue, and they are well integrated Contains insights and awareness of deeper and more subtle aspects of the relevant theory. There is clear evidence of researched/read more widely beyond the core materials
Distinction (75%-84%)
Skilful use of data, theory and recent debate, but they are not well integrated. Presents issues in the broader context and demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding of most aspects of the essay topic. There is evidence of having read beyond the core materials.
Credit (65%-74%)
Demonstrates knowledge of principles and concepts. Demonstrates good understanding of the relevant theory presented in the texts and readings.
Pass (50%-64%)
Contains limited use of theoretical knowledge. Fails to demonstrate awareness of market trends. While some literature is presented they purely descriptive and they are not well integrated.
Fail (Less than 50%)
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of key principles and concepts. There is very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Contains only a few ideas and they are presented uncritically in a purely d.
What shaped Western culture in the period 1300–1550 more the Blac.docx
What shaped Western culture in the period 1300–1550 more: the Black Death’s emphasis on the afterlife (the hereafter) or the Renaissance’s emphasis on human achievement (the here and now)?
Start with a statement identifying your choice; this is your thesis. Then, support your choice with specific examples from at least three of the following categories:
· significant individuals (e.g., political or religious leaders, innovators, explorers);
· characteristics of worldview (e.g., philosophy, religion);
· social institutions (e.g., social mores, practices, hierarchies);
· patronage (discuss the patrons, their motives, influence, and resulting products or artifacts);
· the economies (e.g., changes, different economic systems, impact); and
· politics (e.g., forms of governance, power distributions, contests).
This assignment provides you with an opportunity to practice prioritizing and using specific data to support your choice. Your example may touch on several of the above categories at once, but there should be at minimum three separate examples for which their connection to your choice is explained.
Your essay must be a minimum of 500 words. Be sure to include an introduction; if necessary, review the Unit III Scholarly Activity instructions, which explain how to draft an introduction.
You must use two sources written by historians in history books or journals from the CSU Online Library in addition to the textbook and the study guide. All content must follow APA guidelines, including all sources used, which must be cited and referenced according to APA standards.
Benchmark - Research Proposal
write a Research Proposal (2,000-2,500 words) on a topic relevant to the course. To complete the Research Proposal, do the following:
Review the attached document "Research Proposal Guidelines", as well as the rubric all attached to " complete the assignment.
1. Introductory section: Include hypothesis and a review of the literature.
2. Method section: Include subsections on Participants, Apparatus/Materials/Instruments, Procedure, and Design.
3. Results section: Include statistic, critical values, degrees of freedom, and alpha level.
4. Discussion section: Include interpretation of results, ethical concerns, limitations of study, and suggestions for future research.
5. Figures and Tables section: Include a minimum of two (either two figures, two tables, or a figure and a table).
Include at least 8-10 scholarly references.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Benchmark - Research Proposal
write a Research Proposal (2,000-2,500 words) on a topic relevant to the course. To complete the Research Proposal, do the following:
Review the attached document "Research Proposal Guidelines", as well as the rubric all attached to " complete the assignment.
1. Introductory section: Include hypothesis and a review of the literature.
2. Method ...
EDUC 815Final Exam Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Achieveme.docx
EDUC 815
Final Exam Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
10 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides a detailed overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
9 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 pieces of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides an overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
1 to 8 points
Provides support for the topic by using less than 2 pieces of literature. Provides a minimal overview of the topic at hand.
0 points
Not present
Participants
14 to 15 points
Clearly and accurately describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and support for adequate sample size.
13 points
Describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and some support for adequate sample size.
1 to 12 points
Somewhat describes target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Does not provides demographic information and/or support for adequate sample size.
0 points
Not present
Setting
14 to 15 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are clearly identified. The setting, especially the treatment setting is described in sufficient details so that the study could be replicated.
13 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are mentioned. The setting, especially the treatment setting needs to be described in detail but lacking some key features.
1 to 12 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are identified but not clearly. The setting is lacking some key features.
0 points
Not present
Research Design
14 to 15 points
Research design and all variables are clearly identified. Provides a logical and accurate rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
13 points
Research design and most variables are identified. Provides a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
1 to 12 points
Research design and variables are inaccurately identified. Fails to provide a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
0 points
Not present
Instrumentation
24 to 25 points
Clearly describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are clearly explained. Validity of the instrument is discussed using previous studies to establish validity. Reliability of the instrument is discussed including reliability coefficients.
22 to 23 points
Describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are .
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docx
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project
Detailed Article Critique
Reading, interpreting, and judging the value of epidemiologic literature is a skill that you will exercise throughout your academic career in public health and beyond. To help prepare you for your thesis or capstone experience as well as future coursework, your project this term involves writing a detailed critique of an article. (See link in blackboard.) Construct your critique using complete paragraphs. DO NOT present your critique as an outline.
Please consult the table on the next page to ensure that your review includes the required major elements for this assignment. We will use this table in our evaluation of your project. Each element is worth a specified number of points. Please understand that full credit will not be awarded for simply mentioning each element. You must justify your assessment. For example, you cannot simply state, “The authors justified the importance of their study.” You need to point out how the authors did or did not meet each criterion. Your critique should not be longer than 4-6 pages double-spaced with one-inch margins. There is no minimum page requirement.
For additional assistance, please refer to the article by Young et al. (2009) that is also posted in Blackboard along with the article that you are to review.
See next page for more details. ( ( ( ( ( (
Name___________________________
Element
Possible Points
Grade
Objectives:
· What is/are the research question(s) addressed by this study?
· Did the authors justify the need for their study? What was it?
5
5
Study Design:
· Describe the study design and methods used for the study.
· Critique the overall design by addressing the following:
· Did the authors correctly identify their study design (e.g., the authors stated that their study was a cohort study when it really was a cross-sectional study)?
· Did the authors present clear definitions of their exposure/health outcomes?
· Did the authors adequately describe their sampling (e.g., convenience, consecutive, or random; response rate; study population) and data collection methods (e.g., questionnaire, records, biomarkers, surveys, etc.)?
15
10
Analysis:
· Describe the data analysis plan overall.
· Critique the analysis plan by addressing the following:
· Is the analysis appropriate for the study design (considering you level of statistical knowledge)? Was potential confounding addressed in the analysis stage? If so, how?
· Are the tables and graphs well organized and labeled? Do the tables and graphs provide enough data for reader to draw their own conclusions (e.g. do they stand alone?)?
· Are the findings within the tables/figures consistent? Is each table/figure consistent with the text and other tables/figures?
· Can the findings be attributed simply to chance?
5
10
Validity and Conclusions:
· Internal validity- Consider the potential for selection bias, information bias, and .
CJ 550 Module Thre
CJ 550 Module Three Activity Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Understanding how data is collected is an important aspect of ensuring a research project’s or experiment’s overall validity. Research ethics is an
integral part of any valid research finding. This research will potentially have a major impact on your decision as a leader within the criminal justice organization
where you are employed. Therefore, it is vital to ensure proper findings by ethical data collection to minimize liability in your decisions.
Prompt: Read the following real-world case study: The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. Then, read the following information on predictive policing:
Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment. Think about the research and data collection methods used in both studies. Compare and contrast
both methods. Identify ways in which the findings of the research experiments could be vulnerable to liability. Suggest alternative methods to minimize liability
in the research findings. If no vulnerabilities can be identified, explain how the methods used in the research experiment preserved ethical and accurate findings.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Compares and contrasts the data collection methods of two case studies
Identifies the vulnerabilities of the research findings and/or explains if methods used preserved ethical and accurate findings
Suggests alternative methods to limit liabilities
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Data Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides an exceptionally
detailed comparison and
contrast for the data collection
of the two case studies
Compares and contrasts the data
collection methods of two case
studies
Compares and contrasts the data
collection methods of two case
studies but comparison lacks
details
Does not compare or contrast
the data collection methods of
two case studies
30
Vulnerabilities Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides exceptional detail in
identifying the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explaining if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings
Identifies the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explains if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings
Identifies the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explains if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings but explanation lacks
details
Does not identify the
vulnerabilities nor explain if
methods used preserved ethical
and accurate findings of the
research findings
30
Methods Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides exceptional details for
suggesting alte ...
Developing a Systematic Review Protocol
A systematic review (SR) is a rigorous and organized method to synthesize
the evidence from multiple studies on a particular research question or topic.
The purpose of a systematic review is to identify, appraise, and summarize all
available evidence relevant to a specific research question in a transparent
and replicable manner.
It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of academic literature
concerning a particular research question of topic.
This presentation explores the steps nee
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis. You will apply the knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology that you have developed during this course in a thorough review of existing patient information. Specifically, you will review a patient’s history and a discharge chart from a recent physician visit, explaining the reasons behind diagnosis
or (diagnoses) based on documented symptoms. You will also cite any inconsistencies or concerns and discuss potential and current treatments, all in preparation for your future coding practices. It may seem unnecessary to learn so much about pathophysiology and pharmacology for a career in health information management, but such knowledge is essential in ensuring the accuracy of patient records, coding, and billing.
The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
·
Analyze the pathophysiology of commonly diagnosed health conditions for anticipating the pharmacological needs of patients
·
Differentiate between common health conditions that present similar symptoms using evidence - based resources for ensuring accurate patient health records
·
Analyze standard pharmacological groupings and their specific drugs for their uses in treating patient symptoms and diseases
·
Integrate foundational concepts of anatomy, physiology, and medical terminology into the analysis of symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options for informing accurate coding practices
Prompt
Your patient analysis should answer the following prompt
Using the provided Final Project Patient File (attached), critically analyze the patient’s medical and family history and dissect the discharge chart from the patient’s recent visit. There are several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in this patient file; the pages of the file that contain issues are marked in the upper right - hand corner with red bookmarks. You must identify a total of three true issues with the patient file, explain what makes each identified issue a true issue, and discuss how you would approach addressing each issue in a real professional setting. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Patient History Analysis
a) Summarize the
patient history
, explaining key patient demographics and family history that could be risk factors for common diseases.
b) Identify the
past diagnosis
(or diagnoses, if more than one exists in the file) and explain how the diagnosis was made. Specifically, what tests were done?
c) Discuss the
symptoms
the patient showed according to the file. Why and how did these symptoms lead the doctors to order certain tests?
d) What
alternate diagnosis
(or diagnose.
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis. You will apply the knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology that you have developed during this course in a thorough review of existing patient information. Specifically, you will review a patient’s history and a discharge chart from a recent physician visit, explaining the reasons behind diagnosis
or (diagnoses) based on documented symptoms. You will also cite any inconsistencies or concerns and discuss potential and current treatments, all in preparation for your future coding practices. It may seem unnecessary to learn so much about pathophysiology and pharmacology for a career in health information management, but such knowledge is essential in ensuring the accuracy of patient records, coding, and billing.
The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
·
Analyze the pathophysiology of commonly diagnosed health conditions for anticipating the pharmacological needs of patients
·
Differentiate between common health conditions that present similar symptoms using evidence - based resources for ensuring accurate patient health records
·
Analyze standard pharmacological groupings and their specific drugs for their uses in treating patient symptoms and diseases
·
Integrate foundational concepts of anatomy, physiology, and medical terminology into the analysis of symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options for informing accurate coding practices
Prompt
Your patient analysis should answer the following prompt
Using the provided Final Project Patient File (attached), critically analyze the patient’s medical and family history and dissect the discharge chart from the patient’s recent visit. There are several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in this patient file; the pages of the file that contain issues are marked in the upper right - hand corner with red bookmarks. You must identify a total of three true issues with the patient file, explain what makes each identified issue a true issue, and discuss how you would approach addressing each issue in a real professional setting. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Patient History Analysis
a) Summarize the
patient history
, explaining key patient demographics and family history that could be risk factors for common diseases.
b) Identify the
past diagnosis
(or diagnoses, if more than one exists in the file) and explain how the diagnosis was made. Specifically, what tests were done?
c) Discuss the
symptoms
the patient showed according to the file. Why and how did these symptoms lead the doctors to order certain tests?
d) What
alternate diagnosis
(or diagnose.
How to Write Research Proposal
The document provides guidance on developing a research proposal. It explains that a proposal summarizes the proposed research, sets out the central questions, and convinces others that the project is worthwhile and can be completed competently. Key components of a proposal include an introduction/literature review, research questions, methodology, timeline, and budget. The document emphasizes developing focused research questions and describing the study design, participants, data collection/analysis plans, and ethical considerations in detail.
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate an understanding of the basic
elements of the research process and models for applying evidence to clinical practice.
Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)
Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between
ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate
reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical
judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery
of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team
members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes
in complex health care environments.
QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice
BSN Essential III
Area Gold
Mastery
Silver
Proficient
Bronze
Acceptable
Acceptable
Mastery not
Demonstrated
Evaluates
research design
of study using all
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser 2018, p.
345
Evaluates
research design
of study using all
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser 2018, p.
345
Evaluates
research design
of study using
(75%)
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
research design
of study using
some (50% or
less) components
of the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section
Evaluates
methods/procedu
re, and results of
the study using
all of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser 2018,
p.377
Evaluates
methods/procedu
re, and results of
the study using
all of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser 2018,
p.377
Evaluates
methods/procedu
res and results of
the study using
(75%)
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
methods/procedu
res and results of
the study using
some (50% or
less) components
of the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section
Discusses the
importance of
research, how the
study contributes
to EBP and
applicability of
the specific study
to clinical
practice
Discusses the
importance of
research, how the
study contributes
to EBP and
applicability of
the specific study
to clinical
practice
Discusses the
importance of
research and how
the study may
contribute to
EBP in general
but not how the
specific study
contributes to
current clinical
practice.
Provides simple
definitions of
research and
evidence but
does not delve
into the
relationship
among research,
evidence-based
practice and
Does not address
section
impr ...
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
This document outlines the competencies and evaluation criteria for a course on evidenced-based practice and evaluating quantitative research studies. The course aims to help baccalaureate graduate nurses develop skills in several areas related to research and evidence-based practice, including examining relationships between theory, practice and research; interpreting research findings; differentiating ethical and legal guidelines for research; integrating evidence from various sources to inform clinical practice; and collaborating with health teams on research and improving patient outcomes. Students will be evaluated on their ability to critically evaluate the research design, methods/procedures, results and implications of studies using established checklists to determine mastery of these competencies.
BUS 225 Project Four TemplatePress Release(Replace the bracket
The company is launching new products in a diversification strategy aimed at external audiences including customers, vendors, and the community. The press release summarizes the decision to diversify the company's offerings, explains that market research showed demand for additional products, and states that the new products will launch online and in local stores. It identifies that the expanded product lines will benefit both the company through increased revenue and the community through additional jobs.
Health Status of African Americans.docx
The document provides instructions for a policy brief assignment on a public health issue related to the environment or an environmental issue affecting a population within the U.S. healthcare system. Students are asked to write a 750-1000 word policy brief describing the issue, its effects on a population, and a proposed solution. The brief must follow an outlined structure and include citations from peer-reviewed and other sources to support the arguments. It will be graded based on a rubric assessing content, organization, writing mechanics, and documentation of sources.
There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
There are two broad approaches to financing health care: a market-based approach and a government-financed approach. For each approach, answer the following questions:
Who is provided access?
How much coverage is provided?
How are the services paid for?
How does reimbursement apply?
Are there limitations on care?
What guides care decisions for patients?
What is the quality of services?
Are there competitive options?
How much are prevention and wellness emphasized?
How are health care costs managed and controlled?
How are medical advances generated?
How is health care reform established?
In addition, offer any further advantages and/or disadvantages you have gleaned from your research.
The information above can be presented in one of the following formats as long as there are full sentences and examples:
Short-answer format
Outline
Table
Next, in a short narrative (one for each approach), explain what component you feel requires the most reform in order to finance a health care system that covers all, or most, people. Justify your rationale.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Health Care Financing
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
25.0 %
Health Care Financing: Market-Based
Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages.
Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale.
Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages.
Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details.
25.0 %
Health Care Financing: Government-Financed
Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteri.
Sebastian Gonzalez Project .doc
The document provides feedback on a student project report submitted by Sebastian Gonzalez. The marker, Laura Cole, awarded the project a mark of 74%. Strengths included the professional format and clear presentation of results. Suggestions for improvement were to include images in the introduction to provide context and quote numerical values in the conclusion to validate claims. The student was asked to explain how they will use the feedback to strengthen future work.
Ana Marusic - MedicReS World Congress 2011
Four clinical trials (Trials A-D) tested active treatments against placebo for about 5 years. Trial A reported survival rates, Trial B reported risk reduction, Trial C reported mortality reduction, and Trial D reported number needed to treat. Clinicians considered Trials B and D most useful for practice based on how the results were reported. Reporting guidelines recommend presenting numbers of events, absolute risk reductions, relative risks with confidence intervals, and number needed to treat to improve interpretation and clinical applicability of trial results. Adopting reporting standards can enhance transparency and reliability of research literature.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
Required ReadingsAmerican Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiat.docx
Required Readings
American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
· Standard 2 “Diagnosis” (pages 46-47)
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
· Chapter 5, “Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy” (pp. 225–238 and pp. 245–258)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Young, J. M., & Solomon, M. J. (2009). How to critically appraise an article. Nature Clinical Practice. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 6(2), 82–91.
How to Critically Appraise an Article by Young, J.; Solomon, M., in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vol. 6/Issue 2. Copyright 2009 by Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission of Nature Publishing Group via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Select one of the following articles on psychodynamic therapy to evaluate in your Assignment:
Aznar-Martinez, B., Perez-Testor, C., Davins, M., & Aramburu, I. (2016). Couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy as the treatment of choice: Indications, challenges, and benefits. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(1), 1–20. doi:10.1037/a0038503
Karbelnig, A. M. (2016). “The analyst is present”: Viewing the psychoanalytic process as performance art. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(supplement 1), S153–S172. doi:10.1037/a0037332
LaMothe, R. (2015). A future project of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Revisiting the debate between classical/commitment and analytic therapies. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(2), 334–351. doi:10.1037/a0035982
Migone, P. (2013). Psychoanalysis on the Internet: A discussion of its theoretical implications for both online and offline therapeutic technique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 281–299. doi:10.1037/a0031507
Tummala-Narra, P. (2013). Psychoanalytic applications in a diverse society. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(3), 471–487. doi:10.1037/a0031375
Note: You will access all of these articles from the Walden Library databases.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2015c). The importance of a therapeutic relationship: Mary Boyle [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Points Ra ...
Presentation On Sections
This document provides guidance for writing a psychology experiment report. It outlines the key sections that should be included such as the title, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and deadlines. For each section, it describes the types of information that should be included and provides a marking scheme for evaluating the content and quality. The overall purpose is to help students structure their report and understand what is required to receive a high mark.
Presentation On Sections
This document provides guidance for writing a psychology experiment report. It outlines the key sections that should be included such as the title, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and deadlines. For each section, it describes the types of information that should be included and provides a marking scheme for evaluating the content and quality. The overall purpose is to help students structure their report and understand what is required to receive a high mark.
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
1
HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Title Page:
Title
Name of student and student number
Name of Supervisor
Course
University
Date of submission
Table of Contents
List of appendices
Acknowledgements
Abstract (100 - 150 words)
The abstract must communicate the essential parts of the research proposal and should follow the same
order as the proposal. It must convince the reader that the study is interesting and important
Chapter 1: Literature review (2100 words)
This section should include an Introduction and short justification for the proposed research study. The
literature review must show evidence of wide reading and analysis, synthesis and evaluation of research
findings
Chapter 2: Methodology (3300 words)
Design
Design refers to how your research study will be conducted and the reasons for your choice of study
methodology. You must label the methodology that you will employ e.g. quantitative – correlational or
qualitative – phenomenological. This methodology must be justified from the research literature. Enough
detail must be presented so that the reader can determine the adequacy of the methods. However, it is
important to remember that your proposal is not a theory paper on research methods. Your proposed
study must be central to the discussion with the research literature offering support to your proposed
choice.
Population / Sample
You will need to provide details of your choice of sampling technique and sample size, as well as details
about the participants (i.e. age, gender, religion, medical conditions, employed, etc). Inclusion and
exclusion criteria must be stated along with the rationale for these decisions.
Methods of data collection
Any materials used in the study should be described in sufficient detail. This must also indicate how the
data will be collected and where possible offer samples of the data tools as an appendix (i.e.
questionnaires, interview schedules, and participant consent letters). Information on how, where and
when the data is to be collected must be given.
Robustness of data collection methods
2
You will need to identify the issues regarding the reliability and validity of any measurement tools to be
employed. Similarly, for those undertaking a qualitative study identify the robustness of the study
(consistency, truthfulness and transferability).
Data analysis
Discuss the methods of analysis. If quantitative data is to be collected and analysed you must indicate the
specific statistical tests to be utilised and the statistical package that will be used (i.e. SPSS Version 11).
If qualitative, you must provide clear guidelines as to how the data will be analysed, identifying the model
of analysis that you will utilise (This section must also address the issue of data management, data
protection, etc.
Pilot study
Explain the purpose of a pilot study and give details of your proposed .
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites Student Name and ID .docx
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites
Student Name and ID:
Date:
AT2 (30%) Case-Studies Essay & Presentation (1500 ± 10% words)
Criteria Good (70-100%) Satisfactory (69-50%) Unsatisfactory (<50%)
Content and
Structure
(60%)
- Accurate application of
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Proper introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Comprehensive evaluation
and comparison of major
points of contrast critical to
the chosen issue
- Explicit description of the
purpose of the essay:
misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Appropriate structure to
present a logical feed
- Application of some
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Partial introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Broad evaluation and
comparison of major points of
contrast critical to the chosen
issue
- Mention of the purpose of
the essay: misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Appropriate structure to
present a logical feed
- Poor application of
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Poor introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Brief evaluation and
comparison of major points of
contrast critical to the chosen
issue
- No mention or unclear
description of the purpose of
the essay: misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Incorrect structure to
present a logical feed
Writing
(5%)
- Writing is crisp, clear and
succinct
- No spelling and grammar
mistakes
- Writing is clear in general
and concise with few
repetitions of words and
ideas
- Few spelling and grammar
mistakes
- Misspelled words, incorrect
grammar throughout the
report
- Improper punctuation
makes reading difficult
Resources
(5%)
- Use of relevant resources to
strongly support arguments
- Read widely beyond the unit
selected reading materials
- Use of some good resources
to support arguments
- Read beyond the unit
selected reading materials
- Use of poor resources to
support arguments, or no use
of appropriate resources
- Did not read beyond the unit
selected reading materials
References
(10%)
- Accurately use of
referencing conventions
- In-text citations
- Thorough reference list
- Mostly accurately use of
referencing conventions
- Some In-text citations
- References are listed
- Lacks accurately use of
referencing conventions
- Lacks in-text citations
- Some references listed
Presentation
(20%)
- Own words used throughout
the presentation
- Clear, easy to hear and
understand
- Appropriate expression for
oral presentation
- Eye contact consistent
- Refrain from use of notes
- All References presented in
the last slide
- Own words used throughout
some of the presentation
- Mostly clear and audible to
understand
- Expression for oral
prese.
Cover letter .docx
Dylan Atkinson is applying for a master's degree in human and molecular genetics. He has a biomedical science degree from Sheffield Hallam University where he studied genetics and protein-related modules. During a sandwich year placement, he gained laboratory experience working in biochemistry and haematology at Diana, Princess of Wales hospital pathology lab. He is interested in the diagnostic and treatment applications of genetic and protein research. He believes a master's in genetics is the perfect next step to collaborate with experts and contribute to groundbreaking genetic research.
Applied Biochemistry Feedback Sheet Dylan Atkinson.docx
- The document provides feedback on a student assignment for the module Applied Biochemistry. The student, Dylan Atkinson, received a grade of 68%.
- The tutor, Caroline Dalton, praised Dylan's background section and critical analysis throughout the assignment. However, some areas could have been improved such as providing more detail on the importance of findings and proposed future experiments.
- Suggestions for Dylan to strengthen future assignments include expanding on criticisms of studies and providing more methodological details for proposed future work.
More Related Content
Similar to fb_b9014243.pdf
EDUC 815Final Exam Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Achieveme.docx
EDUC 815
Final Exam Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
10 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides a detailed overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
9 points
Persuades the reader that the topic is important by using 3-4 pieces of relevant and quality literature published within the last 5 years. Provides an overview of the topic at hand and prepares the reader for the background section of the manuscript.
1 to 8 points
Provides support for the topic by using less than 2 pieces of literature. Provides a minimal overview of the topic at hand.
0 points
Not present
Participants
14 to 15 points
Clearly and accurately describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and support for adequate sample size.
13 points
Describes the target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Provides demographic information and some support for adequate sample size.
1 to 12 points
Somewhat describes target population, sample size, type of sample, and the sampling procedures. Does not provides demographic information and/or support for adequate sample size.
0 points
Not present
Setting
14 to 15 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are clearly identified. The setting, especially the treatment setting is described in sufficient details so that the study could be replicated.
13 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are mentioned. The setting, especially the treatment setting needs to be described in detail but lacking some key features.
1 to 12 points
Important features of the site and treatment setting are identified but not clearly. The setting is lacking some key features.
0 points
Not present
Research Design
14 to 15 points
Research design and all variables are clearly identified. Provides a logical and accurate rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
13 points
Research design and most variables are identified. Provides a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
1 to 12 points
Research design and variables are inaccurately identified. Fails to provide a rationale that is supported by research texts and other literature.
0 points
Not present
Instrumentation
24 to 25 points
Clearly describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are clearly explained. Validity of the instrument is discussed using previous studies to establish validity. Reliability of the instrument is discussed including reliability coefficients.
22 to 23 points
Describes instrument including the name, purpose, and contents. Scales of measurement and the scoring procedures are .
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docx
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project
Detailed Article Critique
Reading, interpreting, and judging the value of epidemiologic literature is a skill that you will exercise throughout your academic career in public health and beyond. To help prepare you for your thesis or capstone experience as well as future coursework, your project this term involves writing a detailed critique of an article. (See link in blackboard.) Construct your critique using complete paragraphs. DO NOT present your critique as an outline.
Please consult the table on the next page to ensure that your review includes the required major elements for this assignment. We will use this table in our evaluation of your project. Each element is worth a specified number of points. Please understand that full credit will not be awarded for simply mentioning each element. You must justify your assessment. For example, you cannot simply state, “The authors justified the importance of their study.” You need to point out how the authors did or did not meet each criterion. Your critique should not be longer than 4-6 pages double-spaced with one-inch margins. There is no minimum page requirement.
For additional assistance, please refer to the article by Young et al. (2009) that is also posted in Blackboard along with the article that you are to review.
See next page for more details. ( ( ( ( ( (
Name___________________________
Element
Possible Points
Grade
Objectives:
· What is/are the research question(s) addressed by this study?
· Did the authors justify the need for their study? What was it?
5
5
Study Design:
· Describe the study design and methods used for the study.
· Critique the overall design by addressing the following:
· Did the authors correctly identify their study design (e.g., the authors stated that their study was a cohort study when it really was a cross-sectional study)?
· Did the authors present clear definitions of their exposure/health outcomes?
· Did the authors adequately describe their sampling (e.g., convenience, consecutive, or random; response rate; study population) and data collection methods (e.g., questionnaire, records, biomarkers, surveys, etc.)?
15
10
Analysis:
· Describe the data analysis plan overall.
· Critique the analysis plan by addressing the following:
· Is the analysis appropriate for the study design (considering you level of statistical knowledge)? Was potential confounding addressed in the analysis stage? If so, how?
· Are the tables and graphs well organized and labeled? Do the tables and graphs provide enough data for reader to draw their own conclusions (e.g. do they stand alone?)?
· Are the findings within the tables/figures consistent? Is each table/figure consistent with the text and other tables/figures?
· Can the findings be attributed simply to chance?
5
10
Validity and Conclusions:
· Internal validity- Consider the potential for selection bias, information bias, and .
CJ 550 Module Thre
CJ 550 Module Three Activity Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Understanding how data is collected is an important aspect of ensuring a research project’s or experiment’s overall validity. Research ethics is an
integral part of any valid research finding. This research will potentially have a major impact on your decision as a leader within the criminal justice organization
where you are employed. Therefore, it is vital to ensure proper findings by ethical data collection to minimize liability in your decisions.
Prompt: Read the following real-world case study: The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment. Then, read the following information on predictive policing:
Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment. Think about the research and data collection methods used in both studies. Compare and contrast
both methods. Identify ways in which the findings of the research experiments could be vulnerable to liability. Suggest alternative methods to minimize liability
in the research findings. If no vulnerabilities can be identified, explain how the methods used in the research experiment preserved ethical and accurate findings.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Compares and contrasts the data collection methods of two case studies
Identifies the vulnerabilities of the research findings and/or explains if methods used preserved ethical and accurate findings
Suggests alternative methods to limit liabilities
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Data Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides an exceptionally
detailed comparison and
contrast for the data collection
of the two case studies
Compares and contrasts the data
collection methods of two case
studies
Compares and contrasts the data
collection methods of two case
studies but comparison lacks
details
Does not compare or contrast
the data collection methods of
two case studies
30
Vulnerabilities Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides exceptional detail in
identifying the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explaining if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings
Identifies the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explains if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings
Identifies the vulnerabilities of
the research findings and/or
explains if methods used
preserved ethical and accurate
findings but explanation lacks
details
Does not identify the
vulnerabilities nor explain if
methods used preserved ethical
and accurate findings of the
research findings
30
Methods Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides exceptional details for
suggesting alte ...
Developing a Systematic Review Protocol
A systematic review (SR) is a rigorous and organized method to synthesize
the evidence from multiple studies on a particular research question or topic.
The purpose of a systematic review is to identify, appraise, and summarize all
available evidence relevant to a specific research question in a transparent
and replicable manner.
It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of academic literature
concerning a particular research question of topic.
This presentation explores the steps nee
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis. You will apply the knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology that you have developed during this course in a thorough review of existing patient information. Specifically, you will review a patient’s history and a discharge chart from a recent physician visit, explaining the reasons behind diagnosis
or (diagnoses) based on documented symptoms. You will also cite any inconsistencies or concerns and discuss potential and current treatments, all in preparation for your future coding practices. It may seem unnecessary to learn so much about pathophysiology and pharmacology for a career in health information management, but such knowledge is essential in ensuring the accuracy of patient records, coding, and billing.
The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
·
Analyze the pathophysiology of commonly diagnosed health conditions for anticipating the pharmacological needs of patients
·
Differentiate between common health conditions that present similar symptoms using evidence - based resources for ensuring accurate patient health records
·
Analyze standard pharmacological groupings and their specific drugs for their uses in treating patient symptoms and diseases
·
Integrate foundational concepts of anatomy, physiology, and medical terminology into the analysis of symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options for informing accurate coding practices
Prompt
Your patient analysis should answer the following prompt
Using the provided Final Project Patient File (attached), critically analyze the patient’s medical and family history and dissect the discharge chart from the patient’s recent visit. There are several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in this patient file; the pages of the file that contain issues are marked in the upper right - hand corner with red bookmarks. You must identify a total of three true issues with the patient file, explain what makes each identified issue a true issue, and discuss how you would approach addressing each issue in a real professional setting. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Patient History Analysis
a) Summarize the
patient history
, explaining key patient demographics and family history that could be risk factors for common diseases.
b) Identify the
past diagnosis
(or diagnoses, if more than one exists in the file) and explain how the diagnosis was made. Specifically, what tests were done?
c) Discuss the
symptoms
the patient showed according to the file. Why and how did these symptoms lead the doctors to order certain tests?
d) What
alternate diagnosis
(or diagnose.
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis. You will apply the knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology that you have developed during this course in a thorough review of existing patient information. Specifically, you will review a patient’s history and a discharge chart from a recent physician visit, explaining the reasons behind diagnosis
or (diagnoses) based on documented symptoms. You will also cite any inconsistencies or concerns and discuss potential and current treatments, all in preparation for your future coding practices. It may seem unnecessary to learn so much about pathophysiology and pharmacology for a career in health information management, but such knowledge is essential in ensuring the accuracy of patient records, coding, and billing.
The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
·
Analyze the pathophysiology of commonly diagnosed health conditions for anticipating the pharmacological needs of patients
·
Differentiate between common health conditions that present similar symptoms using evidence - based resources for ensuring accurate patient health records
·
Analyze standard pharmacological groupings and their specific drugs for their uses in treating patient symptoms and diseases
·
Integrate foundational concepts of anatomy, physiology, and medical terminology into the analysis of symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options for informing accurate coding practices
Prompt
Your patient analysis should answer the following prompt
Using the provided Final Project Patient File (attached), critically analyze the patient’s medical and family history and dissect the discharge chart from the patient’s recent visit. There are several inaccuracies and inconsistencies in this patient file; the pages of the file that contain issues are marked in the upper right - hand corner with red bookmarks. You must identify a total of three true issues with the patient file, explain what makes each identified issue a true issue, and discuss how you would approach addressing each issue in a real professional setting. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Patient History Analysis
a) Summarize the
patient history
, explaining key patient demographics and family history that could be risk factors for common diseases.
b) Identify the
past diagnosis
(or diagnoses, if more than one exists in the file) and explain how the diagnosis was made. Specifically, what tests were done?
c) Discuss the
symptoms
the patient showed according to the file. Why and how did these symptoms lead the doctors to order certain tests?
d) What
alternate diagnosis
(or diagnose.
How to Write Research Proposal
The document provides guidance on developing a research proposal. It explains that a proposal summarizes the proposed research, sets out the central questions, and convinces others that the project is worthwhile and can be completed competently. Key components of a proposal include an introduction/literature review, research questions, methodology, timeline, and budget. The document emphasizes developing focused research questions and describing the study design, participants, data collection/analysis plans, and ethical considerations in detail.
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate an understanding of the basic
elements of the research process and models for applying evidence to clinical practice.
Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)
Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between
ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate
reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical
judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery
of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team
members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes
in complex health care environments.
QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice
BSN Essential III
Area Gold
Mastery
Silver
Proficient
Bronze
Acceptable
Acceptable
Mastery not
Demonstrated
Evaluates
research design
of study using all
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser 2018, p.
345
Evaluates
research design
of study using all
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser 2018, p.
345
Evaluates
research design
of study using
(75%)
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
research design
of study using
some (50% or
less) components
of the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section
Evaluates
methods/procedu
re, and results of
the study using
all of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser 2018,
p.377
Evaluates
methods/procedu
re, and results of
the study using
all of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser 2018,
p.377
Evaluates
methods/procedu
res and results of
the study using
(75%)
components of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
methods/procedu
res and results of
the study using
some (50% or
less) components
of the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section
Discusses the
importance of
research, how the
study contributes
to EBP and
applicability of
the specific study
to clinical
practice
Discusses the
importance of
research, how the
study contributes
to EBP and
applicability of
the specific study
to clinical
practice
Discusses the
importance of
research and how
the study may
contribute to
EBP in general
but not how the
specific study
contributes to
current clinical
practice.
Provides simple
definitions of
research and
evidence but
does not delve
into the
relationship
among research,
evidence-based
practice and
Does not address
section
impr ...
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
This document outlines the competencies and evaluation criteria for a course on evidenced-based practice and evaluating quantitative research studies. The course aims to help baccalaureate graduate nurses develop skills in several areas related to research and evidence-based practice, including examining relationships between theory, practice and research; interpreting research findings; differentiating ethical and legal guidelines for research; integrating evidence from various sources to inform clinical practice; and collaborating with health teams on research and improving patient outcomes. Students will be evaluated on their ability to critically evaluate the research design, methods/procedures, results and implications of studies using established checklists to determine mastery of these competencies.
BUS 225 Project Four TemplatePress Release(Replace the bracket
The company is launching new products in a diversification strategy aimed at external audiences including customers, vendors, and the community. The press release summarizes the decision to diversify the company's offerings, explains that market research showed demand for additional products, and states that the new products will launch online and in local stores. It identifies that the expanded product lines will benefit both the company through increased revenue and the community through additional jobs.
Health Status of African Americans.docx
The document provides instructions for a policy brief assignment on a public health issue related to the environment or an environmental issue affecting a population within the U.S. healthcare system. Students are asked to write a 750-1000 word policy brief describing the issue, its effects on a population, and a proposed solution. The brief must follow an outlined structure and include citations from peer-reviewed and other sources to support the arguments. It will be graded based on a rubric assessing content, organization, writing mechanics, and documentation of sources.
There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
There are two broad approaches to financing health care: a market-based approach and a government-financed approach. For each approach, answer the following questions:
Who is provided access?
How much coverage is provided?
How are the services paid for?
How does reimbursement apply?
Are there limitations on care?
What guides care decisions for patients?
What is the quality of services?
Are there competitive options?
How much are prevention and wellness emphasized?
How are health care costs managed and controlled?
How are medical advances generated?
How is health care reform established?
In addition, offer any further advantages and/or disadvantages you have gleaned from your research.
The information above can be presented in one of the following formats as long as there are full sentences and examples:
Short-answer format
Outline
Table
Next, in a short narrative (one for each approach), explain what component you feel requires the most reform in order to finance a health care system that covers all, or most, people. Justify your rationale.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Health Care Financing
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
25.0 %
Health Care Financing: Market-Based
Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages.
Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale.
Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages.
Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details.
25.0 %
Health Care Financing: Government-Financed
Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteri.
Sebastian Gonzalez Project .doc
The document provides feedback on a student project report submitted by Sebastian Gonzalez. The marker, Laura Cole, awarded the project a mark of 74%. Strengths included the professional format and clear presentation of results. Suggestions for improvement were to include images in the introduction to provide context and quote numerical values in the conclusion to validate claims. The student was asked to explain how they will use the feedback to strengthen future work.
Ana Marusic - MedicReS World Congress 2011
Four clinical trials (Trials A-D) tested active treatments against placebo for about 5 years. Trial A reported survival rates, Trial B reported risk reduction, Trial C reported mortality reduction, and Trial D reported number needed to treat. Clinicians considered Trials B and D most useful for practice based on how the results were reported. Reporting guidelines recommend presenting numbers of events, absolute risk reductions, relative risks with confidence intervals, and number needed to treat to improve interpretation and clinical applicability of trial results. Adopting reporting standards can enhance transparency and reliability of research literature.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
Required ReadingsAmerican Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiat.docx
Required Readings
American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
· Standard 2 “Diagnosis” (pages 46-47)
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
· Chapter 5, “Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy” (pp. 225–238 and pp. 245–258)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Young, J. M., & Solomon, M. J. (2009). How to critically appraise an article. Nature Clinical Practice. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 6(2), 82–91.
How to Critically Appraise an Article by Young, J.; Solomon, M., in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vol. 6/Issue 2. Copyright 2009 by Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission of Nature Publishing Group via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Select one of the following articles on psychodynamic therapy to evaluate in your Assignment:
Aznar-Martinez, B., Perez-Testor, C., Davins, M., & Aramburu, I. (2016). Couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy as the treatment of choice: Indications, challenges, and benefits. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(1), 1–20. doi:10.1037/a0038503
Karbelnig, A. M. (2016). “The analyst is present”: Viewing the psychoanalytic process as performance art. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(supplement 1), S153–S172. doi:10.1037/a0037332
LaMothe, R. (2015). A future project of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Revisiting the debate between classical/commitment and analytic therapies. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(2), 334–351. doi:10.1037/a0035982
Migone, P. (2013). Psychoanalysis on the Internet: A discussion of its theoretical implications for both online and offline therapeutic technique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 281–299. doi:10.1037/a0031507
Tummala-Narra, P. (2013). Psychoanalytic applications in a diverse society. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(3), 471–487. doi:10.1037/a0031375
Note: You will access all of these articles from the Walden Library databases.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2015c). The importance of a therapeutic relationship: Mary Boyle [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
· Grid View
· List View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
Points Range: 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Points Ra ...
Presentation On Sections
This document provides guidance for writing a psychology experiment report. It outlines the key sections that should be included such as the title, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and deadlines. For each section, it describes the types of information that should be included and provides a marking scheme for evaluating the content and quality. The overall purpose is to help students structure their report and understand what is required to receive a high mark.
Presentation On Sections
This document provides guidance for writing a psychology experiment report. It outlines the key sections that should be included such as the title, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and deadlines. For each section, it describes the types of information that should be included and provides a marking scheme for evaluating the content and quality. The overall purpose is to help students structure their report and understand what is required to receive a high mark.
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
1
HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Title Page:
Title
Name of student and student number
Name of Supervisor
Course
University
Date of submission
Table of Contents
List of appendices
Acknowledgements
Abstract (100 - 150 words)
The abstract must communicate the essential parts of the research proposal and should follow the same
order as the proposal. It must convince the reader that the study is interesting and important
Chapter 1: Literature review (2100 words)
This section should include an Introduction and short justification for the proposed research study. The
literature review must show evidence of wide reading and analysis, synthesis and evaluation of research
findings
Chapter 2: Methodology (3300 words)
Design
Design refers to how your research study will be conducted and the reasons for your choice of study
methodology. You must label the methodology that you will employ e.g. quantitative – correlational or
qualitative – phenomenological. This methodology must be justified from the research literature. Enough
detail must be presented so that the reader can determine the adequacy of the methods. However, it is
important to remember that your proposal is not a theory paper on research methods. Your proposed
study must be central to the discussion with the research literature offering support to your proposed
choice.
Population / Sample
You will need to provide details of your choice of sampling technique and sample size, as well as details
about the participants (i.e. age, gender, religion, medical conditions, employed, etc). Inclusion and
exclusion criteria must be stated along with the rationale for these decisions.
Methods of data collection
Any materials used in the study should be described in sufficient detail. This must also indicate how the
data will be collected and where possible offer samples of the data tools as an appendix (i.e.
questionnaires, interview schedules, and participant consent letters). Information on how, where and
when the data is to be collected must be given.
Robustness of data collection methods
2
You will need to identify the issues regarding the reliability and validity of any measurement tools to be
employed. Similarly, for those undertaking a qualitative study identify the robustness of the study
(consistency, truthfulness and transferability).
Data analysis
Discuss the methods of analysis. If quantitative data is to be collected and analysed you must indicate the
specific statistical tests to be utilised and the statistical package that will be used (i.e. SPSS Version 11).
If qualitative, you must provide clear guidelines as to how the data will be analysed, identifying the model
of analysis that you will utilise (This section must also address the issue of data management, data
protection, etc.
Pilot study
Explain the purpose of a pilot study and give details of your proposed .
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites Student Name and ID .docx
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites
Student Name and ID:
Date:
AT2 (30%) Case-Studies Essay & Presentation (1500 ± 10% words)
Criteria Good (70-100%) Satisfactory (69-50%) Unsatisfactory (<50%)
Content and
Structure
(60%)
- Accurate application of
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Proper introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Comprehensive evaluation
and comparison of major
points of contrast critical to
the chosen issue
- Explicit description of the
purpose of the essay:
misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Appropriate structure to
present a logical feed
- Application of some
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Partial introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Broad evaluation and
comparison of major points of
contrast critical to the chosen
issue
- Mention of the purpose of
the essay: misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Appropriate structure to
present a logical feed
- Poor application of
terminology, concepts and
principles from BBS211
- Poor introduction of the
issue chosen focusing on a
microbial pathogen important
to Biosecurity
- Brief evaluation and
comparison of major points of
contrast critical to the chosen
issue
- No mention or unclear
description of the purpose of
the essay: misconceptions,
recommendations, solutions
- Incorrect structure to
present a logical feed
Writing
(5%)
- Writing is crisp, clear and
succinct
- No spelling and grammar
mistakes
- Writing is clear in general
and concise with few
repetitions of words and
ideas
- Few spelling and grammar
mistakes
- Misspelled words, incorrect
grammar throughout the
report
- Improper punctuation
makes reading difficult
Resources
(5%)
- Use of relevant resources to
strongly support arguments
- Read widely beyond the unit
selected reading materials
- Use of some good resources
to support arguments
- Read beyond the unit
selected reading materials
- Use of poor resources to
support arguments, or no use
of appropriate resources
- Did not read beyond the unit
selected reading materials
References
(10%)
- Accurately use of
referencing conventions
- In-text citations
- Thorough reference list
- Mostly accurately use of
referencing conventions
- Some In-text citations
- References are listed
- Lacks accurately use of
referencing conventions
- Lacks in-text citations
- Some references listed
Presentation
(20%)
- Own words used throughout
the presentation
- Clear, easy to hear and
understand
- Appropriate expression for
oral presentation
- Eye contact consistent
- Refrain from use of notes
- All References presented in
the last slide
- Own words used throughout
some of the presentation
- Mostly clear and audible to
understand
- Expression for oral
prese.
Similar to fb_b9014243.pdf (20)
EDUC 815Final Exam Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Achieveme.docx
EDUC 815Final Exam Grading RubricCriteriaLevels of Achieveme.docx
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docx
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Your final project for this course will be a patient record analysis.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
Evidenced-Based Practice- Evaluating a Quantitative Research S.docx
BUS 225 Project Four TemplatePress Release(Replace the bracket
BUS 225 Project Four TemplatePress Release(Replace the bracket
There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Required ReadingsAmerican Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiat.docx
Required ReadingsAmerican Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiat.docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
1 HOW TO LAY OUT A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Page .docx
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites Student Name and ID .docx
BBS211 – Pathogens and Parasites Student Name and ID .docx
More from Dylan Atkinson
Cover letter .docx
Dylan Atkinson is applying for a master's degree in human and molecular genetics. He has a biomedical science degree from Sheffield Hallam University where he studied genetics and protein-related modules. During a sandwich year placement, he gained laboratory experience working in biochemistry and haematology at Diana, Princess of Wales hospital pathology lab. He is interested in the diagnostic and treatment applications of genetic and protein research. He believes a master's in genetics is the perfect next step to collaborate with experts and contribute to groundbreaking genetic research.
Applied Biochemistry Feedback Sheet Dylan Atkinson.docx
- The document provides feedback on a student assignment for the module Applied Biochemistry. The student, Dylan Atkinson, received a grade of 68%.
- The tutor, Caroline Dalton, praised Dylan's background section and critical analysis throughout the assignment. However, some areas could have been improved such as providing more detail on the importance of findings and proposed future experiments.
- Suggestions for Dylan to strengthen future assignments include expanding on criticisms of studies and providing more methodological details for proposed future work.
001 Case Study - Submission Point_b9014243 Dylan Atkinson.docx
This document provides a summary of the paper "Inhibition of EHMT1/2 rescues synaptic and cognitive functions for Alzheimer’s disease" by Zheng et al (2019). It discusses how the paper examines the role of histone methyltransferases EHMT1/2 and histone methylation of H3K9 in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. The summary confirms that Zheng et al found increased levels of EHMT1/2 and H3K9me2 in mouse models and human samples of Alzheimer's disease. They also showed that inhibiting EHMT1/2 using BIX01294 decreased H3K9me2 levels and recovered glutamate receptors important for synaptic function. This provides a potential therapeutic approach
Atkinson.docx
The student received a categorical mark of 2:1 for their literature review task. The assessor provided strengths and suggestions for improvement. Key strengths included an introduction that set the background well, a range of primary research was summarized cohesively, and an academic writing style was demonstrated. Suggestions for improvement included adding more of the student's own opinions on the studies' claims, considering other diagnostic techniques, including further subheadings, and minor formatting issues. The student commented they will focus on critical analysis and improving presentation in future work.
Dylan Saxby.doc
This feedback form summarizes the performance of a student, Dylan Saxby, on a coursework assignment for a Pathological Basis of Disease module. The marker, Laura Cole, awarded a mark of 68 and provided strengths and suggestions for improvement. Strengths included that the figure encompassed the required depth and the information in the table was informative. Suggestions were to link studies in the table, add more detail in some areas, and revise the APA reference list format. The student commented they would ensure correct referencing and add more critical analysis and comparison between sources in future work.
Dylan Atkinson CV.docx
Dylan Atkinson is a biomedical science student at Sheffield Hallam University pursuing a BSc degree with a 2:1 grade. He completed a year-long placement at Diana, Princess of Wales NHS hospital in Grimsby where he gained experience in specimen reception, Covid-19 testing, biochemistry, hematology and other roles. During his placement he developed skills in teamwork, critical thinking, problem solving and ensuring efficient workflows. In his free time Dylan enjoys outdoor activities like walking and cycling as well as cooking international cuisine.
Dylan Atkinson Statement of Placement.docx
Dylan completed a student placement at Grimsby Diana Princess of Wales Blood Sciences from July 2021 to July 2022. He rotated through the specimen reception, phlebotomy, biochemistry, haematology, and transfusion areas. Dylan learned various pre-analytic testing techniques, how to collect blood samples, and adhere to health and safety protocols. He helped perform daily maintenance and manage workflow in biochemistry and haematology. Dylan integrated well with the team and became competent in several techniques under supervision.
Placement Presentation
This document summarizes the student's time on a pathology placement at Grimsby, including working with different diagnostic technologies across multiple departments. They gained experience booking samples into the laboratory information management system and collecting samples through phlebotomy. Within microbiology, they learned about rapid Covid-19 detection systems. In biochemistry, the student worked with five analyzers, including an automated sorting system, and modules for various tests. For hematology, they utilized several Sysmex analyzers and technologies like flow cytometry and impedance measurements. They also spent time in coagulation. In conclusion, the student gained skills and career information from this placement.
More from Dylan Atkinson (8)
Applied Biochemistry Feedback Sheet Dylan Atkinson.docx
Applied Biochemistry Feedback Sheet Dylan Atkinson.docx
001 Case Study - Submission Point_b9014243 Dylan Atkinson.docx
001 Case Study - Submission Point_b9014243 Dylan Atkinson.docx
Recently uploaded
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA原版制作(UNITO毕业证书)都灵大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNITO毕业证书)都灵大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
VTV FULL SCRIPT ------------------------
HERE IS THE FULL SCRIPT OF VINNAITHTHAANDI VARUVAAYA BY GAUTHAM VAASUDEV MENON
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA哪里购买美国乔治城大学毕业证硕士学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国乔治城大学毕业证硕士学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）如何办理
一模一样【微信：A575476】【加拿大多伦多大学毕业证（uoft毕业证书）成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
9356872877Sattamatka.satta.matka.satta matka.kalyan weekly chart.kalyan chart.kalyan jodi chart.kalyan penal chart.kalyan today.kalyan open.fix satta.fix fix fix Satta matka nambar. Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka哪里办理(sjsu毕业证书)美国圣何塞州立大学毕业证硕士文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sjsu毕业证书)美国圣何塞州立大学毕业证硕士文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Tanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
Explore the exquisite art of Tanjore Painting, known for its vibrant colors, gold foil work, and traditional themes. Discover its cultural significance today!
Cherries 32 collection of colorful paintings
The cherry: beauty, softness, its heart-shaped plastic has inspired artists since Antiquity. Cherries and strawberries were considered the fruits of paradise and thus represented the souls of men.
Colour Theory for Painting - Fine Artist.pdf
This document is all about Colour Theory for Fine Artist / Painter.
Heart Touching Romantic Love Shayari In English with Images
Explore our beautiful collection of Romantic Love Shayari in English to express your love. These heartfelt shayaris are perfect for sharing with your loved one. Get the best words to show your love and care.
Recently uploaded (20)
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
storyboard: Victor and Verlin discussing about top hat
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Kalyan Matka Satta Matka Dpboss Matka Guessing Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐ Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan panel Chart Indian Matka ...
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Tanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
Tanjore Painting: Rich Heritage and Intricate Craftsmanship | Cottage9
Heart Touching Romantic Love Shayari In English with Images
Heart Touching Romantic Love Shayari In English with Images
fb_b9014243.pdf
- 1. Module Title CPI 2020 Student Name Dylan Atkinson Student Number b9014243 Mark Awarded 65 (Summary of literature search) Good summary of literature search but lacking in some technical detail (Search strategy) Limited search strategy with major expected elements omitted (Results of search) Very low number of souces found making it difficult to appraise the search approach (Best evidence - selection of sources)Good range of sources (Best evidence - justification of sources)The explanation of why evidence was selected was superficial and lacked defined reasoning(Introduction - basic background) Good introdction covering a wide range of content (Intro - Pathogens and disease outcomes) Very good discussion of the pathogens that cause this disease and the outcomes for patients (Intro - Risk factors and epidemiology) Adequate description of the epidemiology of infection and on related risk factors (Intro - Use of stats) Good use of validated statistics in your introduction (Intro - Use of figures) No use of figures but this had no impact on the quality of the introduction (VF - Range of mechanisms) Excellent range of mechanisms included in your figure (VF - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure (VF - Clarity of figure) Good figure but instead of including a figure legend you included an essay style content section which you were told not to include (VF - Use of evidence) Good citations but the paragrpah style of your "figure legend" gave you an unfair advantage over your peers (HDM - Range of mechanisms) Excellent range of mechanisms included in your figure (HDM - Depth of content) Good detail for multiple mechanisms included in your figure (HDM - Clarity of figure) Good figure, a little cluttered in places which make s it slightly difficult to follow (HDM - Use of evidence) Very good integration of citations and source material (Treatment - standard therapy) Good description of a variety of standard therapies (Treatment - resistance, treatment failure, new agents) No content on treatment failure or novel drug discovery included (Prevention - standard prevention techniques) Good description of a variety of standard prevention techniques both immunological and non-immunological (Prevention - novel strategies) Adequate descripton for the need for new prevention techniques, either immunological, non- immunological or both, but the content was superficial and lacked specific molecular detail (Structure and presentation of the report) Very good standard of presentation and a well structured report (Referencing and citation) Very good range of carefully selected sources, good integration within the text