There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
There are two broad approaches to financing health care: a market-based approach and a government-financed approach. For each approach, answer the following questions: Who is provided access? How much coverage is provided? How are the services paid for? How does reimbursement apply? Are there limitations on care? What guides care decisions for patients? What is the quality of services? Are there competitive options? How much are prevention and wellness emphasized? How are health care costs managed and controlled? How are medical advances generated? How is health care reform established? In addition, offer any further advantages and/or disadvantages you have gleaned from your research. The information above can be presented in one of the following formats as long as there are full sentences and examples: Short-answer format Outline Table Next, in a short narrative (one for each approach), explain what component you feel requires the most reform in order to finance a health care system that covers all, or most, people. Justify your rationale. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Health Care Financing 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 % Content 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Market-Based Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages. Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale. Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages. Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details. 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Government-Financed Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteri.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx
Top of Form
ViewG View Grading Rubrics
Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Counselor Values
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the ethical issues. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the ethical issues is offered. Minimal rationale presented. Expresses a preference in a personal point of view, but lacks details. Discusses a counseling plan for the client, but lacks supporting rationale.
Describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Includes essential knowledge about personal values and attitudes with supporting details and resources.
Comprehensively describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge is excellent. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Clearly describes personal values and attitudes in depth with extensive details and resources.
20.0 %Client Rights
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria.
Lists the five ethical principles and discusses how they relate to client rights. Explains how these rights will be incorporated into professional practice with minimal details and/or rationale. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered.
Presents a detailed outline of the relationship between the five ethical principles and how they relate to client rights. Explains how these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with supporting details, and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the relationship between the five ethical principles and client rights. Explain show these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with extensive details and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Responsibility to Warn and Protect
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Factors involved in decision making are vague or not present.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evi ...
Top of Formour Components of Health Care 1Does Not Meet Ex.docx
Top of Form
our Components of Health Care
1
Does Not Meet Expectations
0.00%
2
Approaches Expectations
65.00%
3
Meets Expectations
75.00%
4
Exceeds Expectations
85.00%
5
Outstanding
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Summary of the Health Care Bill
Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the health care bill is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the health care bill lacks comprehension, and understanding of what the purpose is of the bill. Sufficient justification of the bill is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the bill, with gaps in presentation.
Some subject knowledge is evident. Summary of the health care bill has some comprehension of the material and attempts to outline the proposal using outside sources. The bill is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The bill presents marginal justification of purpose. All the subject matter in the bill is covered in minimal quantity and quality.
Subject knowledge appears to be good. Summary of the health care bill shows integrative comprehension of the proposal. The bill's proposal is strong, showing a logical progression. The summary shows a smooth progression through the bill. There is a comprehensive coverage of subject matter.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. Summary of the health care bill is a very well written piece that shows as integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of the material covered in the bill. Clear and convincing outline that is insightful and represents a persuasive understanding of the bill that covers beyond what is needed for the bill.
15.0 %Identification of the Bill?s Stakeholders and their Positions Pro or Con
Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the bill?s stakeholders? interest and their positions is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the stakeholders? interest and their positions pro or con is vague and irrelevant. Sufficient justification of the positions is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the stakeholders? interest, with gaps in presentation.
Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides basic summary of the stakeholders? interest and positions, both pro and con and presentation is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The summary presents marginal justification of the stakeholders? interests. Stakeholder pros and cons are covered in minimal quantity and quality.
Subject knowledge appears to be good. A clear description of the stakeholders? interests is presented along with a thorough discussion of the various pros and cons of each.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. A comprehensive description of the stakeholders? interests as well as their pros and cons is presented with rich detail and includes a logical and insightful discussion of all necessary elements. Includes supportive examples t ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
DetailsWrite a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-b.docx
Details:
Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.
Within your paper, be sure to do the following:
1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
2. Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.
3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
4. Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
5. Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.
6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.
Your paper should contain the following parts:
1. Introduction
2. Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)
3. Conclusion
Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.
Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.
Rubrics
Health Care Delivery Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Criteria
Description of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level description of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Description is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoroughly describes major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
40.0 %Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropria.
DetailsThis assignment requires you to interview one person
Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee's responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:
What went well?
Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?
How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate interventions to meet the needs of your patient?
Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies:
CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2
: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%3
Satisfactory
75.00%4
Good
85.00%5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no ...
NUR 699 – CapstoneProblem Description Holistic AssessmentD.docx
NUR 699 – Capstone
Problem Description Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Problem Description
Describe the background of the problem.
Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties.
Provide the PICOT question.
State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list
No discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice is not addressed or minimally addressed. Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Addresses the problem description and objectives but not all components. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally introduced with now supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Develops partial initial reference list .There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned; The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. Develops an initial reference list. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Problem description and objectives are presented and tie together; Identifies the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable; The problem selection is justified using liter.
DetailsThis assignment requires you to interview one person and r.docx
Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee's responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:
What went well?
Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?
How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate interventions to meet the needs of your patient?
Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies:
CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2
: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
PLEASE I NEED YOU TO BE CAREFUL WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT, IT HAS AN INTERVIEW AND THEN AN ANALYSIS OF THAT INTERWIEW. ANALIZE ALL THE ASPECTS THE PROFESSOR IS ASKING FOR AND THE RUBRIC FOR THAT ASSIGNMENT. I NEED TO IMPROVE MY GRADES BECAUSE THE OTHER GRADES FROM THE PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENTS ARE TOO BAD.
RUBRICS
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Ref.
PICOT Statement Paper1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than S.docx
PICOT Statement Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue
Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.
Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.
Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.
30.0 %Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based
Solution
, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice
Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.
10.0 %PICOT Statement .
Recommended
Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docx
Top of Form
ViewG View Grading Rubrics
Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Counselor Values
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the ethical issues. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the ethical issues is offered. Minimal rationale presented. Expresses a preference in a personal point of view, but lacks details. Discusses a counseling plan for the client, but lacks supporting rationale.
Describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Includes essential knowledge about personal values and attitudes with supporting details and resources.
Comprehensively describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge is excellent. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Clearly describes personal values and attitudes in depth with extensive details and resources.
20.0 %Client Rights
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria.
Lists the five ethical principles and discusses how they relate to client rights. Explains how these rights will be incorporated into professional practice with minimal details and/or rationale. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered.
Presents a detailed outline of the relationship between the five ethical principles and how they relate to client rights. Explains how these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with supporting details, and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the relationship between the five ethical principles and client rights. Explain show these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with extensive details and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Responsibility to Warn and Protect
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Factors involved in decision making are vague or not present.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evi ...
Top of Formour Components of Health Care 1Does Not Meet Ex.docx
Top of Form
our Components of Health Care
1
Does Not Meet Expectations
0.00%
2
Approaches Expectations
65.00%
3
Meets Expectations
75.00%
4
Exceeds Expectations
85.00%
5
Outstanding
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Summary of the Health Care Bill
Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the health care bill is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the health care bill lacks comprehension, and understanding of what the purpose is of the bill. Sufficient justification of the bill is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the bill, with gaps in presentation.
Some subject knowledge is evident. Summary of the health care bill has some comprehension of the material and attempts to outline the proposal using outside sources. The bill is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The bill presents marginal justification of purpose. All the subject matter in the bill is covered in minimal quantity and quality.
Subject knowledge appears to be good. Summary of the health care bill shows integrative comprehension of the proposal. The bill's proposal is strong, showing a logical progression. The summary shows a smooth progression through the bill. There is a comprehensive coverage of subject matter.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. Summary of the health care bill is a very well written piece that shows as integrative comprehension and thoughtful application of the material covered in the bill. Clear and convincing outline that is insightful and represents a persuasive understanding of the bill that covers beyond what is needed for the bill.
15.0 %Identification of the Bill?s Stakeholders and their Positions Pro or Con
Subject knowledge is not or is poorly demonstrated. Summary of the bill?s stakeholders? interest and their positions is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent. Summary of the stakeholders? interest and their positions pro or con is vague and irrelevant. Sufficient justification of the positions is lacking. This is weak or marginal coverage of the stakeholders? interest, with gaps in presentation.
Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides basic summary of the stakeholders? interest and positions, both pro and con and presentation is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The summary presents marginal justification of the stakeholders? interests. Stakeholder pros and cons are covered in minimal quantity and quality.
Subject knowledge appears to be good. A clear description of the stakeholders? interests is presented along with a thorough discussion of the various pros and cons of each.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding. A comprehensive description of the stakeholders? interests as well as their pros and cons is presented with rich detail and includes a logical and insightful discussion of all necessary elements. Includes supportive examples t ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
DetailsWrite a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-b.docx
Details:
Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.
Within your paper, be sure to do the following:
1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
2. Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.
3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
4. Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
5. Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.
6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.
Your paper should contain the following parts:
1. Introduction
2. Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)
3. Conclusion
Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.
Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.
Rubrics
Health Care Delivery Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Criteria
Description of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level description of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Description is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoroughly describes major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
40.0 %Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropria.
DetailsThis assignment requires you to interview one person
Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee's responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:
What went well?
Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?
How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate interventions to meet the needs of your patient?
Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies:
CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2
: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%3
Satisfactory
75.00%4
Good
85.00%5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no ...
NUR 699 – CapstoneProblem Description Holistic AssessmentD.docx
NUR 699 – Capstone
Problem Description Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Problem Description
Describe the background of the problem.
Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties.
Provide the PICOT question.
State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list
No discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice is not addressed or minimally addressed. Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Addresses the problem description and objectives but not all components. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally introduced with now supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Develops partial initial reference list .There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned; The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. Develops an initial reference list. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Problem description and objectives are presented and tie together; Identifies the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable; The problem selection is justified using liter.
DetailsThis assignment requires you to interview one person and r.docx
Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee's responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:
What went well?
Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges?
How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate interventions to meet the needs of your patient?
Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies:
CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2
: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
PLEASE I NEED YOU TO BE CAREFUL WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT, IT HAS AN INTERVIEW AND THEN AN ANALYSIS OF THAT INTERWIEW. ANALIZE ALL THE ASPECTS THE PROFESSOR IS ASKING FOR AND THE RUBRIC FOR THAT ASSIGNMENT. I NEED TO IMPROVE MY GRADES BECAUSE THE OTHER GRADES FROM THE PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENTS ARE TOO BAD.
RUBRICS
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Ref.
PICOT Statement Paper1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than S.docx
PICOT Statement Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue
Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.
Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.
Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.
30.0 %Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based
Solution
, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice
Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.
10.0 %PICOT Statement .
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docx
Research Question?
1. What strategic, tactical and operational choices should A&S Service implements to increase its profit by 5% in the next 2 years in Denmark?
Sub Questions:
1. What is the current position of A&S Service in Danish Market?
2. What are the potential opportunities to encourage A&S growth in Danish Market?
3. What could be the marketing strategies that A&S Service should use to maximize its B2B customers?
Table of Contents
1. About the Thesis
2. Problem Area
2.1 Problem Formulation
2.2 Sub-Questions
3. Delimitation and limitation
4. Research Methods Chapter
4.1 Research Philosophy
4.2 Research Approach
4.3 Research methods
4.4 Time Horizon
4.5 Data Collection
4.6 Critic of Source
5. Theoretical Chapter/logical flow
6. Case Company
6.1 Company Overview
7. Internal Analysis
7.1 Business Model Canvas (BMC)
7.2 Company Mission and Vision
7.3 VRIO
7.4 Financial Performance
7.5 ST of SWOT Analysis
8. External Analysis
8.1 PEST Analysis
8.2 Porters Five Forces
8.3 OT of SWOT Analysis
9. Strategic, Tactical and Functional aspects
9.1 Porter’s Generic Strategies
9.2 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix
9.3 STP Model (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning)
9.4 Marketing Mix
10. Budget and Action Plan
11. Conclusion
12. Appendices
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O502Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations200.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent75.0%Qualitative Studies5.0%Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.A position statement is not real qualitative research.7.50/10.00Background of Study10.0%Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.18.80/20.00Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue15.0%Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT ...
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docx
Details:
Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:
Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:
1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organiza.
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1
Understanding the Problem
Value:
10%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background:
The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.
Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.
The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.
Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.
*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.
Complete the Following
You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.
Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.
You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:
Problem
Capabilities
Benefits
Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lec
turer in the class or by notification in the subject site.
Rationale
This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
the context of an information system;
the processes in systems analysis;
the approaches in systems analysis
Marking criteria
Level Attained
Criteria
STANDARDS
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
1. Content of the Vision Document
Maximum
4 Marks
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided .docx
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided individual as well as collaborative analysis on multiple facets of risk management in the health care setting.
Addressing the knowledge you have gained, and building on that knowledge to add your evaluation of the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today's health care environment, develop a 250-500 word reflection to incorporate the following:
What is a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care organization (MCOs) standards?
What is your assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from the regulatory statutes of a typical MCO? Consider the establishment of conflict resolution and risk management strategies within the health care organization from the employer/employee perspective as well as in regards to patient conflict circumstances.
What MCO responsibilities pertain to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric:
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Explains the Administrative Role of a Health Care Organization Regarding Oversight of Risk Management Policies and Ensuring Compliance With Managed Care Organization (MCO) Standards
Not included.
An explanation of the administrative role of a health care organization regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, and is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Discussion Regarding Assessment of the Value Provided to an Organizat ...
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis an.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Communit.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesi.
Purpose of Assignment The Week 4 individual assignment is th.docx
Purpose of Assignment
The Week 4 individual assignment is the second part of a three part strategic management plan for the company selected by the student in Week 3. The purpose of the assignment is for students to establish long-term goals and objectives; indicate, specify and discuss strategies; and investigate, consider and describe specific business strategies including vertical integration and strategic alliances, to achieve competitive advantage in the industry. The student also generates an appropriate organizational chart in alignment with the stated strategies.
Weeks 3, 4, and 5 Individual Assignments are integrated to generate a Strategic Management Plan. This is Part 2 of the three part Strategic Management Plan.
Assignment Steps
Write a 1,050-word report on the company you selected in Week 3, following up on the Individual Assignment of Week 3 (Environmental Scanning), and address the following:
· Establish Long-term Goals and Objectives
· Strategy Formulation.
· Indicate the markets that the company will pursue.
· Specify the unique value the company will offer in the selected markets.
· Discuss the resources and capabilities that are required.
· Analyze how the company will capture value and sustain competitive advantage over time.
· Business Management Strategy
· Consider Cost and Differentiation Advantages.
· Describe the Corporate Strategy.
· Investigate Vertical Integration.
· Describe Strategic Alliances.
· Detail the Company Competitive Advantage.
· Generate an Organizational Chart of the company you selected.
Benchmark - Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum
The benchmark assesses the following competency:
Benchmark: 5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.
Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:
1. Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.
2. Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.
3. Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submi ...
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docx
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than Satisfactory74.00 .docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Detailed Description of Interview Process
There is no detailed description for the interview process.
A detailed description for the interview process is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observation conducted.
A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
20.0 %Testing Options
There are no testing options included in the interview process.
Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.
One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.
Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.
Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.
25.0 %Interview Questions
There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.
The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not supp.
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism.docx
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism means different things to different people, governments, and organizations based upon context.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Summarize, with citations, at least four (4) different definitions of terrorism. Note: The definitions must come from sources such as U.S. government agencies (e.g., FBI, DOJ, CIA, DOD, DHS, DOS, DIA, NSA, etc.), international agencies and / or foreign governments (e.g. United Nations, England, Israel, etc.), or terrorism experts (e.g. Bruce Hoffman, Walter Laqueur, Brian Jenkins, Paul Pillar, etc.).
Compare and contrast two (2) of the four (4) definitions summarized in Question 1. Provide a rationale for the differences between the two (2) definitions based upon the context of the people, governments, and / or organizations that developed the definition.
Select one (1) of the four (4) chosen definitions of terrorism that you believe most accurately defines terrorism. Recommend at least one (1) change or enhancement that you would make to the definition. Provide a rationale for your response.
Create your own personal comprehensive definition of terrorism. Identify the key criteria inherent in your personal definition, and explain their importance.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
.
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers..docx
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers. Do some research to reveal which of the Founders you believe made the most significant impact on shaping our government. Write a 2 page essay answering the following questions:
•What contributions did this individual make in the creation of our government?
•Why were these contributions so significant?
Include as much specific detail as possible. Be sure include a bibliography with your essay, citing at least three different research sources that you consulted in writing this essay.
.
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. I.docx
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. In this case it happened January 2015 when the suspect Cortez Sims busted into an apartment building in one of our projects and he began shooting. He shot 4 people one which was a one year old child. When police responded they found all four people inside and one of the victims did not survive. All of the victims were transported to the hospital for treatment. The one year old child was paralyzed and the other victims were later released. One of the victims Bianca Horton was fed up with all of the violence going on and decided that she was going to cooperate and began to tell the investigators that she knew the suspect and she would testify against him. The reason that people were scared of Cortez Sims is because he is a big time ranking gang member even though he was 17 at the time. Investigators were able to get enough evidence against Cortez Sims and took out arrest warrants. He was eventually arrested in Knoxville for the quadruple shootings and the murder of one of the victims. When he was arrested he was taken to juvenile. In the Chattanoogan:
Juvenile Court Judge Rob Philyaw on Thursday morning ordered that 17-year-old Cortez Sims be tried as an adult in a College Hill Courts shooting that left one woman dead, a toddler paralyzed, and two others wounded. This was a victory for the prosecution. Police at the time knew that they had a very good case against Cortez Sims because not only did they have physical evidence of him at the crime scene they also had a witness that was going to testify against him. Two years later when the case was going to go to trial, the police responded to yet another shooting.
Bianca Horton, 26, was found
dead
on the side of the road in the 2100 block of Elder Street on the side of Missionary shortly after 9 a.m. with multiple bullet casings on the ground beside her. The mother of four had been a
witness
in the case against the man accused of shooting her daughter (Chattanooga Times Free Press). This was not only a huge blow to the case but it also woke a lot of the people up to the violence that has been going on. The reason that we believe that she was killed was because she was going to testify against Cortez Sims. So how he found out that she was going to testify, and he gave his gang members a green light to have her taken out. As of to this date we have not be able to solve her murder, we have suspects but as of now we cannot prove that they did it. There are many twists that have played out in this case and it set to go to trial this year. The media has been really involved in this case and has been covering every aspect of the case. In this case I really don't think that the investigators or the prosecutors could have seen this coming with the murder of Bianca Horton. We knew that Cortez Sims was a high ranking gang member but were unaware that he had that much power. This case has opened the eyes of many people in the community an.
There is big money attached to having all physician providers up on.docx
There is big money attached to having all physician provider's up on the EHR with substantive incentives for getting this done. If they elect not to participate, they will incur substantive penalties and surrender significant payments. Why is health care the last to subscribe to high tech electronic medicine. The banking industry onboarded, and all other businesses, why does medicine think they are different and why are there incentives to onboard them?
.
More Related Content
Similar to There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docx
Research Question?
1. What strategic, tactical and operational choices should A&S Service implements to increase its profit by 5% in the next 2 years in Denmark?
Sub Questions:
1. What is the current position of A&S Service in Danish Market?
2. What are the potential opportunities to encourage A&S growth in Danish Market?
3. What could be the marketing strategies that A&S Service should use to maximize its B2B customers?
Table of Contents
1. About the Thesis
2. Problem Area
2.1 Problem Formulation
2.2 Sub-Questions
3. Delimitation and limitation
4. Research Methods Chapter
4.1 Research Philosophy
4.2 Research Approach
4.3 Research methods
4.4 Time Horizon
4.5 Data Collection
4.6 Critic of Source
5. Theoretical Chapter/logical flow
6. Case Company
6.1 Company Overview
7. Internal Analysis
7.1 Business Model Canvas (BMC)
7.2 Company Mission and Vision
7.3 VRIO
7.4 Financial Performance
7.5 ST of SWOT Analysis
8. External Analysis
8.1 PEST Analysis
8.2 Porters Five Forces
8.3 OT of SWOT Analysis
9. Strategic, Tactical and Functional aspects
9.1 Porter’s Generic Strategies
9.2 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix
9.3 STP Model (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning)
9.4 Marketing Mix
10. Budget and Action Plan
11. Conclusion
12. Appendices
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O502Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations200.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent75.0%Qualitative Studies5.0%Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.A position statement is not real qualitative research.7.50/10.00Background of Study10.0%Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.18.80/20.00Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue15.0%Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT ...
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docx
Details:
Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:
Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:
1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organiza.
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1
Understanding the Problem
Value:
10%
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
Background:
The Commonwealth Government of Australia is launching ‘My Health Record’ a secure online summary of an individual’s health information.
Available to all Australians, My Health Record is an electronic summary of an individual’s key health information, drawn from their existing records and is designed to be integrated into existing local clinical systems.
The ‘My Health Record’ is driven by the need for the Health Industry to continue a process of reform to drive efficiencies into the health care system, improve the quality of patient care, whilst reducing several issues that were apparent from the lack of important information that is shared about patients e.g. reducing the rate of hospital admissions due to issues with prescribed medications. This reform is critical to address the escalating costs of healthcare that become unsustainable in the medium to long term.
Individuals will control what goes into their My Health Record, and who is allowed to access it. An individual’s My Health Record allows them and their doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers to view and share the individual’s health information to provide the best possible care.
*Please Note: This is a real project that has already been implemented, however, for this assessment you are to write your answer as if the project is in its’ the early stages. There is wide variety of information that can be referenced on this topic.
Complete the Following
You are a Systems Analyst that is part of a project that is being currently being proposed, ‘My Health Record’, your task is to develop a Vision Document for this project.
Currently funding is being sought to build the ‘My Health Record’ system. We will assume that the funding has been approved and that you are the business systems analyst assigned to the project.
You are to describe the problem in your own words, and the capabilities and benefits. You need to create a Project Vision Document which contains:
Problem
Capabilities
Benefits
Specific analysis techniques have not been taught yet, so this assignment does not require technical descriptions.
Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lec
turer in the class or by notification in the subject site.
Rationale
This assignment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:
the context of an information system;
the processes in systems analysis;
the approaches in systems analysis
Marking criteria
Level Attained
Criteria
STANDARDS
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
1. Content of the Vision Document
Maximum
4 Marks
Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided .docx
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided individual as well as collaborative analysis on multiple facets of risk management in the health care setting.
Addressing the knowledge you have gained, and building on that knowledge to add your evaluation of the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today's health care environment, develop a 250-500 word reflection to incorporate the following:
What is a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care organization (MCOs) standards?
What is your assessment of the value provided to an organization that stems from the regulatory statutes of a typical MCO? Consider the establishment of conflict resolution and risk management strategies within the health care organization from the employer/employee perspective as well as in regards to patient conflict circumstances.
What MCO responsibilities pertain to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focus on fraud, waste, and abuse laws?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric:
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Explains the Administrative Role of a Health Care Organization Regarding Oversight of Risk Management Policies and Ensuring Compliance With Managed Care Organization (MCO) Standards
Not included.
An explanation of the administrative role of a health care organization regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is somewhat present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present, and is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
An explanation of a health care organization's administrative role regarding oversight of risk management policies and ensuring compliance with MCO standards is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Discussion Regarding Assessment of the Value Provided to an Organizat ...
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis an.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Communit.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesi.
Purpose of Assignment The Week 4 individual assignment is th.docx
Purpose of Assignment
The Week 4 individual assignment is the second part of a three part strategic management plan for the company selected by the student in Week 3. The purpose of the assignment is for students to establish long-term goals and objectives; indicate, specify and discuss strategies; and investigate, consider and describe specific business strategies including vertical integration and strategic alliances, to achieve competitive advantage in the industry. The student also generates an appropriate organizational chart in alignment with the stated strategies.
Weeks 3, 4, and 5 Individual Assignments are integrated to generate a Strategic Management Plan. This is Part 2 of the three part Strategic Management Plan.
Assignment Steps
Write a 1,050-word report on the company you selected in Week 3, following up on the Individual Assignment of Week 3 (Environmental Scanning), and address the following:
· Establish Long-term Goals and Objectives
· Strategy Formulation.
· Indicate the markets that the company will pursue.
· Specify the unique value the company will offer in the selected markets.
· Discuss the resources and capabilities that are required.
· Analyze how the company will capture value and sustain competitive advantage over time.
· Business Management Strategy
· Consider Cost and Differentiation Advantages.
· Describe the Corporate Strategy.
· Investigate Vertical Integration.
· Describe Strategic Alliances.
· Detail the Company Competitive Advantage.
· Generate an Organizational Chart of the company you selected.
Benchmark - Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum
The benchmark assesses the following competency:
Benchmark: 5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.
Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:
1. Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.
2. Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.
3. Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submi ...
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docx
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than Satisfactory74.00 .docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Detailed Description of Interview Process
There is no detailed description for the interview process.
A detailed description for the interview process is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.
A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observation conducted.
A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
20.0 %Testing Options
There are no testing options included in the interview process.
Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.
One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.
Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.
Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.
25.0 %Interview Questions
There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.
The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not supp.
Similar to There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx (18)
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docx
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docx
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docx
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Assessment item 1Understanding the ProblemValue 10Submis.docx
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided .docx
Throughout this course, you have identified, examined, and provided .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Fami.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Communit.docx
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Communit.docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
Purpose of Assignment The Week 4 individual assignment is th.docx
Purpose of Assignment The Week 4 individual assignment is th.docx
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docx
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than Satisfactory74.00 .docx
1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than Satisfactory74.00 .docx
More from carmanl5wisc
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism.docx
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism means different things to different people, governments, and organizations based upon context.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Summarize, with citations, at least four (4) different definitions of terrorism. Note: The definitions must come from sources such as U.S. government agencies (e.g., FBI, DOJ, CIA, DOD, DHS, DOS, DIA, NSA, etc.), international agencies and / or foreign governments (e.g. United Nations, England, Israel, etc.), or terrorism experts (e.g. Bruce Hoffman, Walter Laqueur, Brian Jenkins, Paul Pillar, etc.).
Compare and contrast two (2) of the four (4) definitions summarized in Question 1. Provide a rationale for the differences between the two (2) definitions based upon the context of the people, governments, and / or organizations that developed the definition.
Select one (1) of the four (4) chosen definitions of terrorism that you believe most accurately defines terrorism. Recommend at least one (1) change or enhancement that you would make to the definition. Provide a rationale for your response.
Create your own personal comprehensive definition of terrorism. Identify the key criteria inherent in your personal definition, and explain their importance.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
.
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers..docx
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers. Do some research to reveal which of the Founders you believe made the most significant impact on shaping our government. Write a 2 page essay answering the following questions:
•What contributions did this individual make in the creation of our government?
•Why were these contributions so significant?
Include as much specific detail as possible. Be sure include a bibliography with your essay, citing at least three different research sources that you consulted in writing this essay.
.
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. I.docx
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. In this case it happened January 2015 when the suspect Cortez Sims busted into an apartment building in one of our projects and he began shooting. He shot 4 people one which was a one year old child. When police responded they found all four people inside and one of the victims did not survive. All of the victims were transported to the hospital for treatment. The one year old child was paralyzed and the other victims were later released. One of the victims Bianca Horton was fed up with all of the violence going on and decided that she was going to cooperate and began to tell the investigators that she knew the suspect and she would testify against him. The reason that people were scared of Cortez Sims is because he is a big time ranking gang member even though he was 17 at the time. Investigators were able to get enough evidence against Cortez Sims and took out arrest warrants. He was eventually arrested in Knoxville for the quadruple shootings and the murder of one of the victims. When he was arrested he was taken to juvenile. In the Chattanoogan:
Juvenile Court Judge Rob Philyaw on Thursday morning ordered that 17-year-old Cortez Sims be tried as an adult in a College Hill Courts shooting that left one woman dead, a toddler paralyzed, and two others wounded. This was a victory for the prosecution. Police at the time knew that they had a very good case against Cortez Sims because not only did they have physical evidence of him at the crime scene they also had a witness that was going to testify against him. Two years later when the case was going to go to trial, the police responded to yet another shooting.
Bianca Horton, 26, was found
dead
on the side of the road in the 2100 block of Elder Street on the side of Missionary shortly after 9 a.m. with multiple bullet casings on the ground beside her. The mother of four had been a
witness
in the case against the man accused of shooting her daughter (Chattanooga Times Free Press). This was not only a huge blow to the case but it also woke a lot of the people up to the violence that has been going on. The reason that we believe that she was killed was because she was going to testify against Cortez Sims. So how he found out that she was going to testify, and he gave his gang members a green light to have her taken out. As of to this date we have not be able to solve her murder, we have suspects but as of now we cannot prove that they did it. There are many twists that have played out in this case and it set to go to trial this year. The media has been really involved in this case and has been covering every aspect of the case. In this case I really don't think that the investigators or the prosecutors could have seen this coming with the murder of Bianca Horton. We knew that Cortez Sims was a high ranking gang member but were unaware that he had that much power. This case has opened the eyes of many people in the community an.
There is big money attached to having all physician providers up on.docx
There is big money attached to having all physician provider's up on the EHR with substantive incentives for getting this done. If they elect not to participate, they will incur substantive penalties and surrender significant payments. Why is health care the last to subscribe to high tech electronic medicine. The banking industry onboarded, and all other businesses, why does medicine think they are different and why are there incentives to onboard them?
.
There is a long history associated with charitable organizations pro.docx
There is a long history associated with charitable organizations providing services governments choose not to provide.
Based on your understanding, answer the following:
Describe a nonprofit sector.
Explain why it exists.
Evaluate and explain how it differs from the private and government sector.
Analyze and describe what limits the role that a nonprofit organization (NPO) can play in society.
.
There are various contributors to the problem of air pollution. Most.docx
There are various contributors to the problem of air pollution. Most of these contributors are man-made. There are many agencies that regulate the level at which these contributors operate, however, no one has really been able to fully stop the progression of air pollutants that are threatening the world in which we live and the air we breathe.
Using the library, Internet and other credible resources, thoroughly research and share with classmates what you find about the following:
What are the top five causes of air pollution?
Select one of them and share with classmates what are the health-risks involved?
What is being done to manage the risks?
What agencies are monitoring the issues?
In your opinion, will any of these causes stop their contributions to air pollution? Thoroughly explain.
.
There are two unfortunate behaviors that have emerged on the interne.docx
There are two unfortunate behaviors that have emerged on the internet:
Posting content without the consent of the targeted person
Posting information without considering the consequences of the post
In website design it is imperative that the designer regard potential legal repercussions of the content that is posted on a website. In a 1 page paper please explain the following:
What technical, legal, privacy, accessibility, and usability issues could your website face and how will you avoid those potential problems?
.
There are two taxable income problems in the spreadsheet attached. W.docx
There are two taxable income problems in the spreadsheet attached. Work through both problems listing out all income and deduction items.
NOTE - The Gross Income in the problem is referring to Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold = Gross Profit. Any other income items are in addition to the gross income amount.
Please complete in Excel
.
There many changes and social problems that impact families. Choos.docx
There many changes and social problems that impact families. Choose one of the following social problems that impact families: divorce or one-parent families.
Project Specifics:
The paper should be between 800 and 1000 words, double spaced, not including the title and reference page.
Use at least three references including one from :
Henslin, James M. (2013).
Social problems: A down to earth approach
, 8th Edition.
Paper must be original, no plagiarism.
Part I:
Begin your paper with a discussion of the social problem you have chosen and explain why you have chosen this particular social problem.
Part II:
As human services professionals, it is important to be able to view social problems from multiple perspectives. There are often many people involved in a social problem. Some of the different people involved in social problems like divorce, one-parent families, and family violence are the mother, the father, and children. All of these people will be impacted by the problem in a unique way, and they may have different perspectives about what is occurring. With Part II, you are going to have the opportunity to examine the social problem you chose from multiple perspectives.
If you chose divorce or one-parent families, discuss how the parents and the children involved view the issue.
Part III:
Conclude your paper by discussing how society views the social problem that you wrote about. In addition, discuss your role as an advocate. How can you work to create awareness and teach others about diversity and multiculturalism.
Please respond to all questions in each part.
Thank You.
.
There was an interesting study by Thomas and his coworkers (2001) th.docx
There was an interesting study by Thomas and his coworkers (2001) that I found about factors that contribute to compliance with renal diet. Some of those factors included being Caucasian, having a supportive environment, and having high knowledge about the importance of the renal diet. I agree that the most important role as a nurse is to educate our patients. It is also important to educate their family to create a supportive environment.
I need you to comment from this post, no more than 150 words and a reference needed.
.
there two questions. The highlight are some important points should .docx
there two questions. The highlight are some important points should be answered. I have a photo of the handout which includes most infomation of questions. And second question may need those pictures. I also post a answer written by another person. U can use it for help. But plz, do not copy it. The font and size should be same as the font and size of questions. Single space!!!
.
There are several variables that combine to establish a successful.docx
There are several variables that combine to establish a successful, sustainable team. Identifying the key components becomes especially challenging when the members are operating virtually. Identify potential barriers to an effective team and options for mitigating these challenges. Provide an example from your personal experience, either on an in-person team or remote, as well as an example from current media. While evaluating your response, keep in mind your team and how you will ensure its success while operating virtually throughout the remainder of this course. Cite your references in proper APA format and ensure that your posting provides a minimum of five paragraphs.
.
There are some elements missing from the action plan in Table 9..docx
There are some elements missing from the action plan in
Table 9.1.
If the EMR system is to be integrated with similar systems at local hospitals, and the physicians fully utilize its data-sharing capabilities, representatives from the hospitals must be drawn into this implementation process.
(Moseley III, George B. .
Managing Health Care Business Strategy
. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, May 2008. p. 251).
Write a three-page report answering the following questions:
What elements (at least two) are missing from the action plan in Table 9.1 for the EMR system? Justify your choice.
Describe the activities that should be implemented to address the missing elements.
Describe where these activities would be added to the list (relative to the other activities already listed).
Specify exactly which people from the hospitals and practice will participate in these new activities and justify your choice.
Assignment Grading Criteria
Identified and explained at least two missing elements from the action plan.
Discussed what activities should be implemented to address the missing elements.
Identified where in the list the activities should be added and justified response.
Explained which people from the hospital /practice should participate in the new activities and justified choice.
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Table 9.1
Action Plan for Acquiring and Deploying an EMR System in a Physician Practice
Action Plan Objectives:
1.
Consult with EMR system vendors about critical specifications, available options, and related costs.
2.
Consult with physicians in the practice about their specific wants and needs in an EMR system.
3.
Define a decision-making protocol for choosing an EMR system and vendor.
4.
Establish and apply criteria for evaluating system options available from vendors.
5.
Invite proposals/presentations from vendors.
6.
Analyze and discuss options.
7.
Select system and vendor.
8.
Negotiate with vendor for purchase of system and related services.
Action Plan Metrics:
Signed system and services purchase agreement within six months.
Initial system cost not to exceed $650,000; annual service contract cost not to exceed $90,000.
Physician involvement in decision-making process—75 percent.
Specific Implementation Activities:
1.
Consult vendors (weeks 1–4)
Identify relevant vendors (IT staff) Request detailed information on products (IT staff)
2.
Consult physicians (weeks 5–7)
Initial meeting with physicians (IT manager, business manager, physician leaders, all physicians)
Provide list of potential system capabilities (IT staff)
Conduct written survey of physician wants and needs (IT and business staff)
Second meeting with physicians to discuss system options and capabilities (IT manager, all physician.
There are several forms of business organizations. The Internal Reve.docx
There are several forms of business organizations. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) taxes different forms in different ways. The tax implications can sometimes be important enough to determine the choice of the form.
Based on your readings for the module, respond to the following:
Describe the tax treatments of regular (or C) corporations, S corporations, and limited liability companies (LLCs).
Compare the tax treatments to identify the similarities and differences.
From the organization's point of view, what are the implications of the different tax treatments?
Write your initial response in 3–4 paragraphs.
.
There are numerous articles that deal with legal and ethical pitfall.docx
There are numerous articles that deal with legal and ethical pitfalls related to misinterpretation, lack of reliability and validity of data. We are all aware of the popular usage of references and resources chosen not for their own unquestionable authenticity and validity but rather chosen to support a specific leaning, point of view, or action. The adage about using statistics in any way one wants emphasizes the frequency of data mishandling.
Reviewing scandals of our recent corporate past and please answer the following:
How did the company you have researched use or misuse data to support their decisions?
What were the results of this mishandling?
3 Paragraphs minimim. 1 Scholarly resource minimum.
.
There are nursing organizations that help to guide nursing practice .docx
There are nursing organizations that help to guide nursing practice in specific settings. Visit one of the organization's websites and find information about the professional standards and educational requirements. Remember to cite your source for the information. Share this information with the group and consider what challenges might be encountered when trying to attain these standards.
APA FORMAT
Nies, M. A., & McEwen, M. (2015).
Community/Public health nursing: Promoting the health of populations
(6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier.
.
There are multifaceted ethical issues relating to international inve.docx
There are multifaceted ethical issues relating to international investments. One aspect relates to human rights. Most Latin American governments have constitutions that mandate health care as a human right, yet some of these countries provide poor health care for the majority of their population.
During the 1980s, the general populace of these countries deteriorated, even though several Latin American countries developed strategies to reposition medical personnel and services to rural areas. Throughout this time, many international donors provided assistance; however they did so with imposed conditions. An example of this constrained assistance was the World Bank, which imposed restrictions that included privatization of health care, as well as required limitations on universal access.
Did the World Bank and other international donors act responsibly and ethically in constraining their humanitarian assistance? Who has the responsibility for the health care of the Latin American people? Is it a reasonable and socially responsible practice to offer international assistance in exchange for an opportunity to shape a country's political and/or social system? Why or why not?
.
There are two parts to this assignmentPart one One of the task.docx
There are two parts to this assignment:
Part one:
One of the tasks an administrative manager must do is diagram the administrative organization structure to help achieve results. The purpose of the diagram is to depict the relationship between and among members of the organization. It shows the flow of information, lines of authority, levels of responsibility, and sometimes the levels of pay.
Situation:
You recently accepted a consulting position to the Midland Company. They gave you a description of the administrative services division managers, supervisors, and employees. They want you to diagram its administrative services division organizational line structure using Microsoft PowerPoint, or another downloadable software you find online.
Administrative Services Division Managers, Supervisors, and Employees:
The following
unordered
list describes the current administrative positions in the company.
Administrative Assistant I – works under the Administrative Manager and performs basic reception duties and telephone routing.
Word Processor I – works under the Administrative Manager and produces administrative documents using Word.
Mail Receiving Clerk – works under the Mail Services Manager and processes incoming mail.
Systems Analyst – works under the Information Technology Services Manager and provides systems studies for the administrative services division.
Executive Administrative Assistant – supports the Director of Administrative Services
Director of Administrative Services – directs and manages the entire Administrative Services division.
Inactive Records Supervisor – works under the Records Manager and supervises the Inactive Records clerks and inactive records.
Inactive Records Clerk I – works under the Inactive Records Supervisor and stores and retrieves inactive records.
Inactive Records Clerk 2 – works under the Inactive Records Supervisor and stores and retrieves inactive records.
Mail Distribution Clerk – works under the Mail Receiving Clerk and routes and delivers mail to all departments.
Word Processor II – works under the Administrative Manager and produces administrative reports using Word.
Mail Services Manager – works under the Administrative Support Manager and supervises and controls mail services.
Network Administrator – works under the Information Technology Services Manager and oversees computer networks to ensure that they function smoothly.
Records Manager – works under the Administrative Support Manager and oversees the Records Center including active and inactive records storage, retrieval, protection, and security.
Computer Programmer – works under the Computer Services Supervisor and writes computer code for computer systems
Active Records Supervisor – works under the Records Manager and supervises the Active Records clerk and active records.
Computer Services Supervisor – works under the Information Technology Services Manager and supervises the Help Desk and computer programmers.
Administrative.
There are two assignments both needs two pages. This is high school .docx
There are two assignments both needs two pages. This is high school work so i dont need references or intext citations. I have included some of the reading in his lesson and the first assignment I think I put in red and the second assignment is listed. I put the topic for the first assignment and on the second I listed some leadership qualities to talk about in the paper.
.
There are three questions1.Although numerous family members can .docx
There are three questions
1.Although numerous family members can develop cancer in the same tissue, each person's cancer is unique.
TRUE FALSE
2. What is the role of inherited genes in cancer?
3.What is the role of newly acquired mutations in cancer?
.
More from carmanl5wisc (20)
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism.docx
There is no universal agreed upon definition of terrorism. Terrorism.docx
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers..docx
There were many men involved in this process – our Founding Fathers..docx
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. I.docx
There is currently a high profile case going on in Chattanooga TN. I.docx
There is big money attached to having all physician providers up on.docx
There is big money attached to having all physician providers up on.docx
There is a long history associated with charitable organizations pro.docx
There is a long history associated with charitable organizations pro.docx
There are various contributors to the problem of air pollution. Most.docx
There are various contributors to the problem of air pollution. Most.docx
There are two unfortunate behaviors that have emerged on the interne.docx
There are two unfortunate behaviors that have emerged on the interne.docx
There are two taxable income problems in the spreadsheet attached. W.docx
There are two taxable income problems in the spreadsheet attached. W.docx
There many changes and social problems that impact families. Choos.docx
There many changes and social problems that impact families. Choos.docx
There was an interesting study by Thomas and his coworkers (2001) th.docx
There was an interesting study by Thomas and his coworkers (2001) th.docx
there two questions. The highlight are some important points should .docx
there two questions. The highlight are some important points should .docx
There are several variables that combine to establish a successful.docx
There are several variables that combine to establish a successful.docx
There are some elements missing from the action plan in Table 9..docx
There are some elements missing from the action plan in Table 9..docx
There are several forms of business organizations. The Internal Reve.docx
There are several forms of business organizations. The Internal Reve.docx
There are numerous articles that deal with legal and ethical pitfall.docx
There are numerous articles that deal with legal and ethical pitfall.docx
There are nursing organizations that help to guide nursing practice .docx
There are nursing organizations that help to guide nursing practice .docx
There are multifaceted ethical issues relating to international inve.docx
There are multifaceted ethical issues relating to international inve.docx
There are two parts to this assignmentPart one One of the task.docx
There are two parts to this assignmentPart one One of the task.docx
There are two assignments both needs two pages. This is high school .docx
There are two assignments both needs two pages. This is high school .docx
There are three questions1.Although numerous family members can .docx
There are three questions1.Although numerous family members can .docx
Recently uploaded
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of other biological materials, Ownership and period of protection
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Presentation required for the master in Education.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
This ppt include the description of the edible vaccine i.e. a new concept over the traditional vaccine administered by injection.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Instagram:-
https://instagram.com/special_education_needs_01?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
WhatsApp:-
https://chat.whatsapp.com/JVakNIYlSV94x7bwunO3Dc
YouTube:-
https://youtube.com/@special_education_needs
Teligram :- https://t.me/special_education_needs
Slide Shere :-
https://www.slideshare.net/shabnambano20?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source=ssslideview
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
Recently uploaded (20)
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
There are two broad approaches to financing health care a market-ba.docx
- 1. There are two broad approaches to financing health care: a market-based approach and a government-financed approach. For each approach, answer the following questions: Who is provided access? How much coverage is provided? How are the services paid for? How does reimbursement apply? Are there limitations on care? What guides care decisions for patients? What is the quality of services? Are there competitive options? How much are prevention and wellness emphasized? How are health care costs managed and controlled? How are medical advances generated? How is health care reform established? In addition, offer any further advantages and/or disadvantages you have gleaned from your research. The information above can be presented in one of the following formats as long as there are full sentences and examples: Short-answer format Outline Table Next, in a short narrative (one for each approach), explain what component you feel requires the most reform in order to finance a health care system that covers all, or most, people. Justify your rationale. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Health Care Financing
- 2. 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 % Content 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Market-Based Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages. Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale. Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages. Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to
- 3. be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details. 25.0 % Health Care Financing: Government-Financed Includes little knowledge about each component. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Does not distinguish between advantages and disadvantages. Includes little knowledge about some components with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Recognizes advantages and disadvantages without providing rationale. Includes knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface-level evaluation of the content is offered. Describes basic advantages and disadvantages. Includes essential knowledge about each component with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. Covers each component in depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) and advantages and disadvantages, providing explicit examples and details. 20.0 %
- 4. Narrative Narrative does not address the assignment criteria and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Narrative lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility as appropriate. Narrative is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. Presents minimal justification of claims. Argument supports the purpose logically, but not thoroughly. Sources used are credible as appropriate. Narrative shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims throughout. Reasoning is supportive. Most sources are authoritative as appropriate. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. Rationale is in-depth and supported by evidence. All sources are authoritative as appropriate. 10.0 % Content Comprehension Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated. 10.0 % Organization and Effectiveness 10.0 % Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
- 5. construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. 10.0 % Format 10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic