INNOVATION

Anna Sabidussi
Some facts and figures…

29%

of new business founded in 1992
were still alive in 2002.

•   Source: Shane (2008)
Some facts and figures…

1/3

of companies listed in the
FORTUNE 500 in 1970 had
disappeared by 1983.
Mapping the innovation space


                ATTRIBUTE
  DEGREE
Mapping the innovation space
                      Product-      Process        Strategic
                      Service
                       Product
Radical



                                    Process Re-
                      Revolution    engineering      Strategic
                                                  Transformation
Current Incremental




                       Product        Process      Strategic
                      Evolution       Change      Development



                        Market        Process       Strategic
                      Penetration    Efficiency      Focus

Source: Ahmed and Shepherd, 2010
Mapping the innovation space
• Disruptive innovation (source: Clayton Christensen)
• Target overshot customers or non-customers;

    • Prioritize good-enough;

    • Do what established competitors don’t want to do,
      can’t do or are uninterested in doing.




Source: Anthony, Johnson, Sinfield and Altman, 2008
Mapping the innovation space

 • Business Model Innovation canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur)
• NYTD’s organizational evolution
        Ability to borrow


                            Integrated            Distinct but
                            (1995)                linked (2004)      High



                            Unsopported            Isolated (1999)
                                                                     Low


                               Low                            High
                                          Ability to forget



Source: Govindarajan and Trimble, 2005
INNOVATION NETWORK




  R&D partnerships in software 1970-1979,
  MERIT-CATI



                              R&D partnerships in software 1995-1999,
                              MERIT-CATI
Source: Cloodt et al. 2010
Relative importance of external sourcing drivers

  Market entry


Time-to -Market*


           Cost
                                                                                      SMEs
                                                                                      LARGE
   Uncertainty


    Knowledge


    Monitoring


                   0.0   1.0   2.0           3.0              4.0         5.0




                                       Market entry


                                     Time-to -market


                                                Cost
                                                                                                                Large average
                                                                                                                Large best in class
                                        Uncertainty


                                         Knowledge


                                         Monitoring**


                                                        0.0         1.0         2.0           3.0   4.0   5.0
Source: Sabidussi, 2009
Cooperation …
   70


   60


   50


   40                                                                                                  positive
                                                                                                       negative

   30                                                                                                  neutral



   20


   10


    0
             Patents      Sales/New Products   Economic Indicators   R&D inputs   Process Innovation


                  Performance implications of cooperation

Source: Belderbos, Duysters and Sabidussi, 2012
… and beyond …
HIGH
                                          Acquisition

                         Joint Ventures
 CONTROL




                                CVC


                     Alliance



             Licensing
LOW

           SHORT                                        LONG
                         TIME HORIZON
Innovation strategy             Upsides                 Downsides                  Requirements                 Examples

                                                     -Organic growth is
                      -Better control of IP
                                                     Slower
  Recruiting and      -Long term growth                                      -Astute strategic human        -Google
                                                     -Challenge of
 Retaining superior   focus                                                  Resource management            -Merk
                                                     Identifying and
  Human capital       -Difficult for competitors                             - Organizational flexibility   -Goldman Sachs
                                                     valuing superior
                      to imitate
                                                     human capital.


                                                                                                            -Apple
                      -Internalization of skills     -Full risk exposure     -Culture of risk tolerance
   Internal R&D                                                                                             -Intel
                      and capabilities               -Long time horizon      -Organizational flexibility
     Spending                                                                                               -BMW
                      - Full capture of returns      -Uncertain returns      -Long term commitment
                                                                                                            -HP


                      -Shared risk
                                                     -Potential loss of
                      Multiple, small-scale                                                                 -IBM
                                                     IP control              Dedicated function
     Strategic        investments provide                                                                   -Eli Lilly
                                                     -Challenge of           for the management
     Alliances        strategic options                                                                     -Oracle
                                                     alignment of goals      of partnerships
                      -Faster than internal                                                                 -Procter & Gamble
                                                     -Shared returns
                      internal development


                      -Faster than growing           -Risk of overpaying
                      organically                    -Cultural integration   Capability to identify         -Cisco
    Acquisitions      -Acquire innovative            -Involves relying       and assimilate                 -GE
                      technologies before startups   on others for           acquisition targets            -Microsoft
                      become competitors              innovation




  Source: Frank Rothaermel and A. Hess. MITSLoan management review spring 2010
Non-Stars            Stars              R&D            Alliances   Acquisitions


 Non-stars


   Stars


   R&D


 Alliances


Acquisitions




Source: Frank Rothaermel and A. Hess. MITSLoan management review spring 2010
2


                                                                                                                        Portfolio Balance




                                                      Individual GC
                                                       Assessment
                              1
                                                   (risk-return profile)
                                                                                                                                            Governance choice
                                                                                                                                                selection

                                                                                                                                    3
                 no               yes
                      B2B ?
         OTHER                                                                                                                                 Update total
                                                                                                                                                portfolio


                                                                                                t= t0 + ∆t
                                        EXTERNAL




                                                                                                                    4



                                   Internal
              INTERNAL             sourcing                                          no
                                                                                                                 Technology
                                     Vs.
                                                                                                                   change
                                   external
                                  sourcing ?
                                                                           Mayor Evolutions ?                       Market
                                                                   yes
                                                                                                                 development


                                                                                                                  Corporate
                                                                                                                 Strategy shift
                                                   Start
                                                   t= t0




Source: Sabidussi et al., 2011
Innovation and entrepreneurship

Innovation and entrepreneurship

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Some facts andfigures… 29% of new business founded in 1992 were still alive in 2002. • Source: Shane (2008)
  • 3.
    Some facts andfigures… 1/3 of companies listed in the FORTUNE 500 in 1970 had disappeared by 1983.
  • 4.
    Mapping the innovationspace ATTRIBUTE DEGREE
  • 5.
    Mapping the innovationspace Product- Process Strategic Service Product Radical Process Re- Revolution engineering Strategic Transformation Current Incremental Product Process Strategic Evolution Change Development Market Process Strategic Penetration Efficiency Focus Source: Ahmed and Shepherd, 2010
  • 6.
    Mapping the innovationspace • Disruptive innovation (source: Clayton Christensen)
  • 7.
    • Target overshotcustomers or non-customers; • Prioritize good-enough; • Do what established competitors don’t want to do, can’t do or are uninterested in doing. Source: Anthony, Johnson, Sinfield and Altman, 2008
  • 8.
    Mapping the innovationspace • Business Model Innovation canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur)
  • 9.
    • NYTD’s organizationalevolution Ability to borrow Integrated Distinct but (1995) linked (2004) High Unsopported Isolated (1999) Low Low High Ability to forget Source: Govindarajan and Trimble, 2005
  • 10.
    INNOVATION NETWORK R&D partnerships in software 1970-1979, MERIT-CATI R&D partnerships in software 1995-1999, MERIT-CATI Source: Cloodt et al. 2010
  • 11.
    Relative importance ofexternal sourcing drivers Market entry Time-to -Market* Cost SMEs LARGE Uncertainty Knowledge Monitoring 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Market entry Time-to -market Cost Large average Large best in class Uncertainty Knowledge Monitoring** 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Source: Sabidussi, 2009
  • 12.
    Cooperation … 70 60 50 40 positive negative 30 neutral 20 10 0 Patents Sales/New Products Economic Indicators R&D inputs Process Innovation Performance implications of cooperation Source: Belderbos, Duysters and Sabidussi, 2012
  • 13.
    … and beyond… HIGH Acquisition Joint Ventures CONTROL CVC Alliance Licensing LOW SHORT LONG TIME HORIZON
  • 14.
    Innovation strategy Upsides Downsides Requirements Examples -Organic growth is -Better control of IP Slower Recruiting and -Long term growth -Astute strategic human -Google -Challenge of Retaining superior focus Resource management -Merk Identifying and Human capital -Difficult for competitors - Organizational flexibility -Goldman Sachs valuing superior to imitate human capital. -Apple -Internalization of skills -Full risk exposure -Culture of risk tolerance Internal R&D -Intel and capabilities -Long time horizon -Organizational flexibility Spending -BMW - Full capture of returns -Uncertain returns -Long term commitment -HP -Shared risk -Potential loss of Multiple, small-scale -IBM IP control Dedicated function Strategic investments provide -Eli Lilly -Challenge of for the management Alliances strategic options -Oracle alignment of goals of partnerships -Faster than internal -Procter & Gamble -Shared returns internal development -Faster than growing -Risk of overpaying organically -Cultural integration Capability to identify -Cisco Acquisitions -Acquire innovative -Involves relying and assimilate -GE technologies before startups on others for acquisition targets -Microsoft become competitors innovation Source: Frank Rothaermel and A. Hess. MITSLoan management review spring 2010
  • 15.
    Non-Stars Stars R&D Alliances Acquisitions Non-stars Stars R&D Alliances Acquisitions Source: Frank Rothaermel and A. Hess. MITSLoan management review spring 2010
  • 16.
    2 Portfolio Balance Individual GC Assessment 1 (risk-return profile) Governance choice selection 3 no yes B2B ? OTHER Update total portfolio t= t0 + ∆t EXTERNAL 4 Internal INTERNAL sourcing no Technology Vs. change external sourcing ? Mayor Evolutions ? Market yes development Corporate Strategy shift Start t= t0 Source: Sabidussi et al., 2011