In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
CEPLAS Cologne June 2017: Research misconduct; science‘s self administered ...Leonid Schneider
Workshop presentation at International CEPLAS Summer School 2017 – „Emerging Frontiers in Plant Sciences“ June 5th – 9th, 2017 Sportschule Hennef, Germany
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
CEPLAS Cologne June 2017: Research misconduct; science‘s self administered ...Leonid Schneider
Workshop presentation at International CEPLAS Summer School 2017 – „Emerging Frontiers in Plant Sciences“ June 5th – 9th, 2017 Sportschule Hennef, Germany
The presentation is about Plagiarism - What it is; How to avoid it; How to find it; Citation Methods; Writing style; Methods for citing various sources. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
A description of predatory publishers and predatory journals, how to spot them and how to avoid them delivered online to forum of nurses in Pakistan in 2020
Scientists need to emphasize the innovation and implications of their work if it is to be published. Yet, they face pressures to exaggerate and distort the medical and public health implications of their findings, from institutions, high impact journals seeking immediate media attention, and from the media. If they are to behave responsibly, they must resist such pressures, and instead adopt and encourage responsible reporting practices.
Twitter as a Research Megaphone - How can academics build a Twitter following and use it to promote research to journalists and policymakers - Connecticut Scholars Strategy Network Chapter @ct_ ssn - June 24, 2021
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poisonLeonid Schneider
Microb&Co Workshop 7ICME, October 2016,
Catania October 2016 Talk 1
How research misconduct happens and how it can be prevented. The roles of universities, journals and funders
Talk 2 at Research Integrity workshop at Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne, April 6th 2018
http://www.mpipz.mpg.de/events/13302/4358571
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trialJames Coyne
Talk delivered to patients with chronic fatigue/myalgic
encephalomyelitis Belfast Castle February 7, 2016 about trial of psychotherapy that failed to demonstrate effectiveness, despite claims to the contrary
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?James Coyne
A presentation from the International Psycho-Oncology Society Conference in Rotterdam invited by the IPOS Early Career Professionals Special Interest Group.
The presentation is about Plagiarism - What it is; How to avoid it; How to find it; Citation Methods; Writing style; Methods for citing various sources. A verbal consent of Prof. Dr. C. B. Bhatt was obtained (at 4.15pm on Dt. 26-11-2016 at Hall A-2, GTU, Chandkheda) to float the presentation online in benefits of the research scholar society.
A description of predatory publishers and predatory journals, how to spot them and how to avoid them delivered online to forum of nurses in Pakistan in 2020
Scientists need to emphasize the innovation and implications of their work if it is to be published. Yet, they face pressures to exaggerate and distort the medical and public health implications of their findings, from institutions, high impact journals seeking immediate media attention, and from the media. If they are to behave responsibly, they must resist such pressures, and instead adopt and encourage responsible reporting practices.
Twitter as a Research Megaphone - How can academics build a Twitter following and use it to promote research to journalists and policymakers - Connecticut Scholars Strategy Network Chapter @ct_ ssn - June 24, 2021
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poisonLeonid Schneider
Microb&Co Workshop 7ICME, October 2016,
Catania October 2016 Talk 1
How research misconduct happens and how it can be prevented. The roles of universities, journals and funders
Talk 2 at Research Integrity workshop at Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne, April 6th 2018
http://www.mpipz.mpg.de/events/13302/4358571
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trialJames Coyne
Talk delivered to patients with chronic fatigue/myalgic
encephalomyelitis Belfast Castle February 7, 2016 about trial of psychotherapy that failed to demonstrate effectiveness, despite claims to the contrary
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?James Coyne
A presentation from the International Psycho-Oncology Society Conference in Rotterdam invited by the IPOS Early Career Professionals Special Interest Group.
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media EngagementTara Haelle
This talk was developed for graduate students in a vaccines policy course at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. The talk centered on how the students - from disciplines including public health, immunology and epidemiology - could effectively communicate to the public about vaccines and vaccination policy. Audiences for this communication might include parents, school nurses, legislators, other policy makers or just the general public.
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxroushhsiu
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned data which you have compiled in an Microsoft® Excel® spreadsheet (see document template). He also said, "We grow sod and trees at Jeemp Farms. We sell the sod mainly to home builders in the area, although we sell to some individuals who are purchasing square footages to re-sod their yard. Many home builders will purchase to sod an entire subdivision. They then may come back to us to purchase trees for the yards. It really is a package deal. For builders like that, we are a one-stop-shop. In most cases, however, we sell the trees to orchards and some individuals. The purchaser is responsible for all shipping costs related to their product."
"Our production process is different for each product. For sod, we plant the seed, irrigate, cut, and roll the sod and then transport it. For the trees, we plant the root stock, graft the tree, water until a particular maturity and then dig it up and sell it. We inspect the plants as needed to make sure we are producing a quality product that is disease-free."
"We have delayed purchasing some machinery that reduces time for the planting of the trees because it is a large up-front cost and we don't want to have a huge outlay of cash if our profits keep going down."
"The grass does not require as much irrigation as the trees, as it is at a lower elevation than the tree acres and is closer to the creek; it gets a lot of the run off."
"Historically, we have always been able to sell everything we produce. Hopefully, that will continue since Houston is expanding rapidly."
Week 5 Source Evaluation Worksheet
First read the notes that begin on p. 3 of this handout and the table that follows. Then, complete the analysis for each of your sources.
Part 1: Annotation
Using APA format, identify the source and write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. A sample annotation can be found in the directions for this assignment.
Annotation 1
Annotation 2
(Continue for as many annotations as you have developed)
Example: Annotation 1
Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and t he erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.
The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences i ...
Esta presentación tiene como objetivo identificar algunas técnicas de búsqueda, uso y manejo de información en las Bases de Datos de la Biblioteca Enrique A. Laguerre.
1. Evaluating Information Tomado de Teaching and Marketing Electronic Information Programs , 2003 . Doanld A. Barclay Shades of Gray
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. Scholar reads journal article. Gets idea for conducting original research. Scholar conducts a literature review. Scholar forms a hypothesis, develops a research methodology, and conducts research. Scholar writes up results of research as an article. Scholar submits manuscript of article to editor of scholarly journal. Editor sends copies of manuscript to peer reviewers. Peer reviewers recommend publication upon revision. Editor sends manuscript to scholar with peer reviewers’ anonymous comments. Scholar revises manuscript and re-submits to editor. Revised manuscript is accepted and (eventually) published in the journal. The Scholarly Publication Process