The EUA Public Funding Observatory was launched in 2008 with the aim to monitor the impact of the financial crisis on higher education in different countries across Europe. Since then, EUA has been collecting quantitative and qualitative data on public funding received by European higher education institutions, and analysing both long- term trends and recent changes.
The funding data and other relevant figures are made available to EUA by its collective members, the national rectors’ conferences, whose support has been invaluable. Processed and analysed in view of evolving student numbers, as well as the overall economic context adjusted to inflation and GDP growth, this data provides some empirical evidence on public funding trajectories in the field of higher education in Europe.
Decision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertaintyVladimir Bakhrushin
Presentation for XХXII International Conference Problems of Decision Making under Uncertainties (PDMU-2018), August 27-31, 2018, Prague, Czech Republic
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27143.44966
This paper discusses the global financial crisis of 2008/9 in thirteen countries, the ten new EU members that previously were communist and the three countries of Western former Soviet Union. Their problems were excessive current account deficits and private foreign debt, currency mismatches, and high inflation, while public finances were in good shape. The dominant cause was fixed exchange rates. Many lessons can be drawn from this crisis. A dollar peg makes no sense in this part of the world. The five currency boards in the region have lacked credibility. By contrast, inflation targeting has worked eminently. The euro has proven credible both in the countries that officially adopted it and in the countries that adopted it unilaterally. With the exception of Hungary, all the countries in the region have displayed decent fiscal policies. No government should accept large domestic loans in foreign currency and they can be regulated away. The IMF has successfully returned to the original Washington consensus with relatively few conditions: a reasonable budget balance and a realistic exchange rate policy, while focusing more on bank restructuring. The most controversial issue is the role of the ECB. The ECB should facilitate the accession of willing EU members to the euro by relaxing the ERM II conditions.
Authored by: Anders Aslund
Published in 2009
ANALYSIS OF TUITION GROWTH RATES BASED ON CLUSTERING AND REGRESSION MODELSIJDKP
Tuition plays a significant role in determining whether a student could afford higher education, which is
one of the major driving forces for country development and social prosperity. So it is necessary to fully
understand what factors might affect the tuition and how they affect it. However, many existing studies on
the tuition growth rate either lack sufficient real data and proper quantitative models to support their
conclusions, or are limited to focus on only a few factors that might affect the tuition growth rate, failing to
make a comprehensive analysis. In this paper, we explore a wide variety of factors that might affect the
tuition growth rate by use of large amounts of authentic data and different quantitative methods such as
clustering and regression models.
Decision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertaintyVladimir Bakhrushin
Presentation for XХXII International Conference Problems of Decision Making under Uncertainties (PDMU-2018), August 27-31, 2018, Prague, Czech Republic
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27143.44966
This paper discusses the global financial crisis of 2008/9 in thirteen countries, the ten new EU members that previously were communist and the three countries of Western former Soviet Union. Their problems were excessive current account deficits and private foreign debt, currency mismatches, and high inflation, while public finances were in good shape. The dominant cause was fixed exchange rates. Many lessons can be drawn from this crisis. A dollar peg makes no sense in this part of the world. The five currency boards in the region have lacked credibility. By contrast, inflation targeting has worked eminently. The euro has proven credible both in the countries that officially adopted it and in the countries that adopted it unilaterally. With the exception of Hungary, all the countries in the region have displayed decent fiscal policies. No government should accept large domestic loans in foreign currency and they can be regulated away. The IMF has successfully returned to the original Washington consensus with relatively few conditions: a reasonable budget balance and a realistic exchange rate policy, while focusing more on bank restructuring. The most controversial issue is the role of the ECB. The ECB should facilitate the accession of willing EU members to the euro by relaxing the ERM II conditions.
Authored by: Anders Aslund
Published in 2009
ANALYSIS OF TUITION GROWTH RATES BASED ON CLUSTERING AND REGRESSION MODELSIJDKP
Tuition plays a significant role in determining whether a student could afford higher education, which is
one of the major driving forces for country development and social prosperity. So it is necessary to fully
understand what factors might affect the tuition and how they affect it. However, many existing studies on
the tuition growth rate either lack sufficient real data and proper quantitative models to support their
conclusions, or are limited to focus on only a few factors that might affect the tuition growth rate, failing to
make a comprehensive analysis. In this paper, we explore a wide variety of factors that might affect the
tuition growth rate by use of large amounts of authentic data and different quantitative methods such as
clustering and regression models.
Trends in university funding in Europe and the impact on universities and management
Thomas Estermann
Director
Governance, Funding & Public Policy Development
Warwick - 24 January 2018
Thomas Estermann, Director for Governance, Funding and Public Policy Development at the European University Association tackles the issue of universities’ efficiency and their value for society in a broader European context. The presentation shows the most recent trends in public funding of universities across Europe, including the release of the 2016 Public Funding Observatory, and explore the links between public budgets for universities, efficiency measures and funding modalities.
The full report is available here: http://eua.be/Libraries/governance-autonomy-funding/public-funding-observatory-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=0
and more information about our work in Higher Education and Research Funding can be found here: http://eua.be/activities-services/projects/eua-online-tools/public-funding-observatory-tool.aspx
Thomas Estermann, Director for Governance, Funding and Public Policy at EUA presents the latest trends in system funding, efficiency and funding reforms in European Universities at the 4th EUA Funding Forum, 18 October 2018, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona
Financing Schools in Europe: Mechanisms, Methods and Criteria in Public FundingFLE Liberdade de Educação
This report provides a framework for understanding the structure of funding systems of primary and general secondary education by delivering an analysis of authority levels involved and the methods and criteria used for determining the level of resources for financing school education. It covers 27 of the 28 EU Member States as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey
Benchmarking open data availability across europe the case of eu structural...Luigi Reggi
Although Open Government, Government 2.0 and Open Government Data have been at the centre of the debate on e-Government policy over the last two years, the European Union still lacks comparable data on transparency. European Regional Policy is the ideal context to test a Benchmarking 2.0: it involves all Member States and EU regions, influences national and regional policies and can push the transparency agenda in those areas of Europe where administrative culture and capacity is traditionally low. In this paper the datasets on beneficiaries of European Structural Funds provided by the Managing Authorities of the Operational Programmes of EU27 are evaluated through a scheme based on the 8 principles of Open Government Data. The paper compares the performance of the European Countries for the first time and sets new targets that could be considered as possible requirements for the next programming period.
"The future of University in Europe and beyond": intervento di Stefano Paleari (Presidente CRUI) al 2015 Pavia PhD workshop on Perspectives for the European Universities: the role of PhD research in society, Tuesday, April 21 2015.
A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education – Using the case stud...Dominic Orr
As an example of a study, which aims to support the use of evidence-based policy in decision-making, the paper will present a study on cost-sharing, which was commissioned by the European Union. The study had the task of reviewing the impact study on changes to the balance of higher education costs between public grants and private revenues through case-study research (Orr, Wespel, & Usher, 2014a, 2014b). The purpose of the study was to provide a basis for open discussions on reforms to higher education funding and their consequences.
The Challenge from Within: New EU Donors and European Development Cooperation Dr Lendy Spires
Although the discussion of new donors in the changing global development landscape usually focuses on the development cooperation forays of emerging economies, the budding aid programmes of the dozen member states that have joined the EU since 2004 are also illustrative of challenges from the larger non-DAC donor community. They provide an instance of the diversification of sources of development finance and an example of shifting roles within the global economy, making a transition from being aid recipients to aid providers in a relatively short period of time. While challenges of donor coordination and learning how to cope with alternative perspectives on the guiding logic and preferred manner of implementing development cooperation are not unique to the arrival of new EU member states on the donor scene, the new EU member states pose a distinct and direct challenge for the future of European development cooperation, as these donors can shape the direction that EU development policy takes from within the EU system itself. Development Cooperation Profile of the New EU Donors As with other so-called ›new‹ donors, some of the EU’s newest member states have had experience with devel-opment cooperation stretching back several decades, even if the scale and the quality of development engagement has changed in connection with their accession to the EU. The influence of these states on EU development cooper-ation also predates EU accession, as European support for economic and political transition processes in Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s drew attention away from other focal regions for European development policy.
Despite a voluminous literature on the topic, the question of whether aid leads to growth is still controversial. To observe the pure effect of aid, researchers used instruments that must be exogenous to growth and explain well aid flows. This paper argues that instruments used in the past do not satisfy these conditions. We propose a new instrument based on predicted aid quantity and argue that it is a significant improvement relative to past approaches. We find a significant and relatively big effect of aid: a one standard deviation increase in received aid is associated with a 1.6 percentage points higher growth rate.
presentatie Frans van Vught (Lustrumcongres Erasmus Trustfonds, 4 juni 2013)Ronald van der Heijden
"Wetenschapsfinanciering, een internationale verkenning; hoe doen andere landen dat?"
Frans van Vught
High level expert European Commission
Voorzitter reviewcommissie Hoger Onderwijs
Lustrumcongres 100 jaar Erasmus Trustfonds
"De toekomst van financiering van wetenschap"
4 juni 2013, Senaatszaal Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
I misteri dei dipartimenti di eccellenza: genesi, anatomia, ideologiaGiuseppe De Nicolao
Per primeggiare nella classifica 2017 dei dipartimenti di eccellenza, un premio Nobel come Giorgio Parisi contava assai poco, dato che un bravo storico della fisica pesava tre volte tanto. Ciò nonostante, la classifica "si fonda su un modello matematico solido", se si vuole prestar fede alla rassicurazione inviata dall'Anvur al Consiglio Universitario Nazionale. Talmente solido che l'Anvur e il Ministero hanno preferito tenere nascosto che ben 119 dipartimenti su 767 avevano meritato zero in pagella e che nel 2022 la situazione è verosimilmente peggiorata. Ma come nasce e come funziona questa classifica così strana, che oltre a penalizzare i Nobel, funge da "ammazza-Sud"? Nel seminario, vengono spiegati a uno a uno gli ingranaggi dell'algoritmo che genera i punteggi dell'ISPD, l'indicatore standardizzato di performance dipartimentale. La sua nascita risale al cosiddetto voto standardizzato, ideato nel 2014 da una commissione della CRUI. Nascita segnata da un peccato originale che si cercò di rendere invisibile attraverso modifiche che condussero all’indicatore ISPD, infine adottato nel 2017 come generatore della classifica dei dipartimenti di eccellenza. La ricostruzione storica e la dissezione anatomica aiuteranno a capire perché si diventa eccellenti o paria; per esempio perché nel 2017 il miglior dipartimento di fisica era quello che aveva pochi fisici e tanti psicologi. Verrà anche spiegato perché la presenza o l’assenza di ben precisi settori scientifici rende più o meno probabile la scalata verso l’eccellenza. Da ultimo, si cerca di capire quali motivazioni stanno alla base dell’adozione di una classifica così irrazionale.
_________
I misteri dei dipartimenti di eccellenza: genesi, anatomia, ideologia
Seminario di Giuseppe De Nicolao.
Organizzato da Roars, Rete 29 Aprile e Circolo Errera.
24 giugno 2022
Contenuti del video:
- Presentazione di Massimiliano Tabusi (Rete 29 Aprile)
- Introduzione
- La pietra filosofale della competizione
- Un grecista eccellente? Vale 4 Nobel per la Fisica!
- La legge dell’imbuto
- Perché ISPD è distribuito «a vasca da bagno»?
- Perché la classifica deve rimanere segreta?
- Una svista che vale un ricorso al TAR
- Ammazzare il Sud giustifica i mezzi
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03E_5srlLPo
Trends in university funding in Europe and the impact on universities and management
Thomas Estermann
Director
Governance, Funding & Public Policy Development
Warwick - 24 January 2018
Thomas Estermann, Director for Governance, Funding and Public Policy Development at the European University Association tackles the issue of universities’ efficiency and their value for society in a broader European context. The presentation shows the most recent trends in public funding of universities across Europe, including the release of the 2016 Public Funding Observatory, and explore the links between public budgets for universities, efficiency measures and funding modalities.
The full report is available here: http://eua.be/Libraries/governance-autonomy-funding/public-funding-observatory-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=0
and more information about our work in Higher Education and Research Funding can be found here: http://eua.be/activities-services/projects/eua-online-tools/public-funding-observatory-tool.aspx
Thomas Estermann, Director for Governance, Funding and Public Policy at EUA presents the latest trends in system funding, efficiency and funding reforms in European Universities at the 4th EUA Funding Forum, 18 October 2018, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona
Financing Schools in Europe: Mechanisms, Methods and Criteria in Public FundingFLE Liberdade de Educação
This report provides a framework for understanding the structure of funding systems of primary and general secondary education by delivering an analysis of authority levels involved and the methods and criteria used for determining the level of resources for financing school education. It covers 27 of the 28 EU Member States as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey
Benchmarking open data availability across europe the case of eu structural...Luigi Reggi
Although Open Government, Government 2.0 and Open Government Data have been at the centre of the debate on e-Government policy over the last two years, the European Union still lacks comparable data on transparency. European Regional Policy is the ideal context to test a Benchmarking 2.0: it involves all Member States and EU regions, influences national and regional policies and can push the transparency agenda in those areas of Europe where administrative culture and capacity is traditionally low. In this paper the datasets on beneficiaries of European Structural Funds provided by the Managing Authorities of the Operational Programmes of EU27 are evaluated through a scheme based on the 8 principles of Open Government Data. The paper compares the performance of the European Countries for the first time and sets new targets that could be considered as possible requirements for the next programming period.
"The future of University in Europe and beyond": intervento di Stefano Paleari (Presidente CRUI) al 2015 Pavia PhD workshop on Perspectives for the European Universities: the role of PhD research in society, Tuesday, April 21 2015.
A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education – Using the case stud...Dominic Orr
As an example of a study, which aims to support the use of evidence-based policy in decision-making, the paper will present a study on cost-sharing, which was commissioned by the European Union. The study had the task of reviewing the impact study on changes to the balance of higher education costs between public grants and private revenues through case-study research (Orr, Wespel, & Usher, 2014a, 2014b). The purpose of the study was to provide a basis for open discussions on reforms to higher education funding and their consequences.
The Challenge from Within: New EU Donors and European Development Cooperation Dr Lendy Spires
Although the discussion of new donors in the changing global development landscape usually focuses on the development cooperation forays of emerging economies, the budding aid programmes of the dozen member states that have joined the EU since 2004 are also illustrative of challenges from the larger non-DAC donor community. They provide an instance of the diversification of sources of development finance and an example of shifting roles within the global economy, making a transition from being aid recipients to aid providers in a relatively short period of time. While challenges of donor coordination and learning how to cope with alternative perspectives on the guiding logic and preferred manner of implementing development cooperation are not unique to the arrival of new EU member states on the donor scene, the new EU member states pose a distinct and direct challenge for the future of European development cooperation, as these donors can shape the direction that EU development policy takes from within the EU system itself. Development Cooperation Profile of the New EU Donors As with other so-called ›new‹ donors, some of the EU’s newest member states have had experience with devel-opment cooperation stretching back several decades, even if the scale and the quality of development engagement has changed in connection with their accession to the EU. The influence of these states on EU development cooper-ation also predates EU accession, as European support for economic and political transition processes in Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s drew attention away from other focal regions for European development policy.
Despite a voluminous literature on the topic, the question of whether aid leads to growth is still controversial. To observe the pure effect of aid, researchers used instruments that must be exogenous to growth and explain well aid flows. This paper argues that instruments used in the past do not satisfy these conditions. We propose a new instrument based on predicted aid quantity and argue that it is a significant improvement relative to past approaches. We find a significant and relatively big effect of aid: a one standard deviation increase in received aid is associated with a 1.6 percentage points higher growth rate.
presentatie Frans van Vught (Lustrumcongres Erasmus Trustfonds, 4 juni 2013)Ronald van der Heijden
"Wetenschapsfinanciering, een internationale verkenning; hoe doen andere landen dat?"
Frans van Vught
High level expert European Commission
Voorzitter reviewcommissie Hoger Onderwijs
Lustrumcongres 100 jaar Erasmus Trustfonds
"De toekomst van financiering van wetenschap"
4 juni 2013, Senaatszaal Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
I misteri dei dipartimenti di eccellenza: genesi, anatomia, ideologiaGiuseppe De Nicolao
Per primeggiare nella classifica 2017 dei dipartimenti di eccellenza, un premio Nobel come Giorgio Parisi contava assai poco, dato che un bravo storico della fisica pesava tre volte tanto. Ciò nonostante, la classifica "si fonda su un modello matematico solido", se si vuole prestar fede alla rassicurazione inviata dall'Anvur al Consiglio Universitario Nazionale. Talmente solido che l'Anvur e il Ministero hanno preferito tenere nascosto che ben 119 dipartimenti su 767 avevano meritato zero in pagella e che nel 2022 la situazione è verosimilmente peggiorata. Ma come nasce e come funziona questa classifica così strana, che oltre a penalizzare i Nobel, funge da "ammazza-Sud"? Nel seminario, vengono spiegati a uno a uno gli ingranaggi dell'algoritmo che genera i punteggi dell'ISPD, l'indicatore standardizzato di performance dipartimentale. La sua nascita risale al cosiddetto voto standardizzato, ideato nel 2014 da una commissione della CRUI. Nascita segnata da un peccato originale che si cercò di rendere invisibile attraverso modifiche che condussero all’indicatore ISPD, infine adottato nel 2017 come generatore della classifica dei dipartimenti di eccellenza. La ricostruzione storica e la dissezione anatomica aiuteranno a capire perché si diventa eccellenti o paria; per esempio perché nel 2017 il miglior dipartimento di fisica era quello che aveva pochi fisici e tanti psicologi. Verrà anche spiegato perché la presenza o l’assenza di ben precisi settori scientifici rende più o meno probabile la scalata verso l’eccellenza. Da ultimo, si cerca di capire quali motivazioni stanno alla base dell’adozione di una classifica così irrazionale.
_________
I misteri dei dipartimenti di eccellenza: genesi, anatomia, ideologia
Seminario di Giuseppe De Nicolao.
Organizzato da Roars, Rete 29 Aprile e Circolo Errera.
24 giugno 2022
Contenuti del video:
- Presentazione di Massimiliano Tabusi (Rete 29 Aprile)
- Introduzione
- La pietra filosofale della competizione
- Un grecista eccellente? Vale 4 Nobel per la Fisica!
- La legge dell’imbuto
- Perché ISPD è distribuito «a vasca da bagno»?
- Perché la classifica deve rimanere segreta?
- Una svista che vale un ricorso al TAR
- Ammazzare il Sud giustifica i mezzi
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03E_5srlLPo
Slides dell'intervento di Giuseppe De Nicolao nella giornata di studi
Le ragioni dell'emergenza, le ragiomi della didattica
Università di Padova, 26 novembre 2020
La didattica a distanza, aspetti critici, limiti e potenzialitàGiuseppe De Nicolao
In vista dell'anno accademico 2020/21 si parla molto di didattica universitaria cosiddetta "blended", nel senso di erogata simultaneamente in presenza per una parte degli studendi e a distanza, per esempio in streaming, per quelli che non sono in aula. Nel video, si prova a rispondere a tre domande.
1. Come variano le probabilità di contagio in ambienti chiusi frequentati da più persone in funzione della cubatura, del ricambio d'aria e del tempo di permanenza?
2. Quali sono e come sono gestibili i principali problemi audio e video della didattica a distanza?
3. Quali relazioni tra didattica blended, datafication e università delle piattaforme?
Intervento di Giuseppe De Nicolao presentato nel corso del convegno “L' Università tra crisi e rinascita: quale direzione per il futuro?”, organizzato dal Comitato Nazionale Universitario (CNU), 10 luglio 2020
Più citazioni se volete far carriera! La valutazione della ricerca universitariaGiuseppe De Nicolao
La valutazione della ricerca Universitaria: webinar con Giuseppe De Nicolao di ROARS: 29 maggio ore 18:00
Quarto appuntamento di “Immaginiamo il futuro, dopo la crisi e oltre”, incontri in webinar con personalità della cultura e della politica per ragionare e discutere del futuro e degli scenari del dopo crisi. Gli incontri sono organizzati dai prof. Plinio Innocenzi e Quirico Migheli.
Slides dell'intervento di Rossella Latempa al Convegno "SCUOLA DI COMPETENZE: VERSO UN NUOVO MODELLO DIDATTICO. QUALE?", Gilda degli Insegnanti, Vicenza 18 marzo 2019.
State-fostered immaturity? Kant, Galileo and the Grand EvaluatorGiuseppe De Nicolao
Slide dell'intervento di Giuseppe De Nicolao al convegno “Academic Freedom Today - Insights from Law, Philosophy, and Institutional Practice”, 6-7 dicembre 2018, Libera Università di Bolzano, https://academicfreedom.events.unibz.it/
_________
State-fostered immaturity? Kant, Galileo and the Grand Evaluator
In 2017, the president of Anvur, the Italian agency for research evaluation, was asked if bibliometrics-based research evaluation could discourage innovative research. The answer was disconcerting, yet revealing: a scientific genius “will be rewarded twenty years from now, when he will become the most famous scientist in the world. In the meantime, he should be grateful that he maintained his academic position without being burnt alive. Frankly speaking, we are not all Galilei and Newton”. No less worrying is the creeping effect of research evaluation on the public use of reason by academics. Linking administrative actions such as hiring, career, funding and wages to the outcomes of centralized research evaluation can subtly impair academic freedom in fields such as health, environment, economics, education and research policy. These issues will be illustrated through the analysis of methods, outcomes and unintended effects of research evaluations run by Anvur.
Una rivista ad accesso aperto, senza costi per gli autori e di alta qualità: ...Giuseppe De Nicolao
«Times have changed. Articles now circulate easily via the Internet, but unfortunately MLJ publications are under restricted access. […] In summary, our resignation from the editorial board of MLJ reflects our belief that journals should principally serve the needs of the intellectual community, in particular by providing the immediate and universal access to journal articles that modern technology supports, and doing so at a cost that excludes no one.» Questa lettera di dimissioni, firmata dalla maggioranza degli editor della rivista Machine Learning (Kluwer ), sancì la nascita del Journal of Machine Learning Research, una rivista open access, subito accreditatasi tra le più qualificate sedi di pubblicazione per le ricerche nel settore del machine learning. Una vicenda che risale al 2000, ma che, ad anni di distanza, non cessa di far discutere. Come quando nel 2011 Kent Anderson (Scholarly Kitchen) mise in dubbio la sostenibilità di riviste open access e senza costi per gli autori. «In my field (computer science) one of the most prominent journals is entirely free and open access (Journal of Machine Learning Research)» fu la secca replica di Yann LeCun. Ne nacque una discussione, proseguita sul blog di Stuart Shieber, che appare emblematica sotto diversi aspetti e di cui proveremo a riassumere i punti salienti.
Conferenza AISA (Associazione Italiana per la promozione della Scienza Aperta), ospitata dal Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche dell'Università di Pisa, dal titolo Publishing without perishing? La scienza aperta all’epoca della valutazione della ricerca (link is external), con gli interventi di Alberto Baccini (Università di Siena), Roberto Caso (Università di Trento), Giuseppe De Nicolao (Università di Pavia) e Paola Galimberti (Università di Milano) e con la partecipazione di Paolo Rossi (Università di Pisa) in veste di discussant. Giovedì 19 gennaio 2017 dalle ore 15 in aula 2, Polo Piagge
Credo quia absurdum, l'apologetica delle "Weapons of math destruction” Giuseppe De Nicolao
Intervento presentato al Convegno "Teocrazia e Tecnocrazia", organizzato da Fondazione Roma Sapienza e da Nuova Accademia.
giovedì 3 maggio alle ore 10.30 presso l’aula Multimediale Palazzo del Rettorato
Sapienza Università di Roma
Abstract. “There is no alternative” è la legittimazione principe della tecnocrazia. Non sorprende, pertanto, che solo di rado i tecnocrati cerchino di legittimare, sul piano razionale ed etico, il loro ruolo e i loro strumenti. Tra i pochi che si sono cimentati, vi sono due membri del Consiglio direttivo dell’Anvur, l’Agenzia nazionale per la valutazlone del sistema universitario e della ricerca. Sul versante del dibattito razionale, quella che potremmo chiamare “apologetica della valutazione” si scontra con l’obiezione “Caesar non est supra grammaticos”, attuale ogni qual volta chi detiene il potere pretende di prendere parte al dibattito scientifico, che per sua natura deve svolgersi tra pari. Sul versante etico, il vulnus che la valutazione di stato infligge alla libertà della scienza è giustificato dalla necessità di guidare una comunità scientifica (quella italiana) debole e bisognosa di indirizzi, un argomento curiosamente simile a quello invocato dal Grande Inquisitore per legittimare il suo regime teocratico. Una coincidenza già notata da Aldous Huxley che, commentando nel 1959 la distopia tecnocratica descritta nel suo romanzo “Brave New World”, ne riconduceva il dilemma etico fondamentale proprio al famoso personaggio di Dostoevskij.
Intervento di Rossella Latempa al CONVEGNO DI AGGIORNAMENTO CESP: PER RIPARTIRE DALLA SCUOLA. DISCUSSIONE INTORNO A SETTE TEMI:
9 febbraio 2018 - IIS USUELLI-RUZZA - Padova
http://www.cesp-pd.it/spip/spip.php?article1464
Intervento di Rossella Latempa al CONVEGNO DI AGGIORNAMENTO CESP: PER RIPARTIRE DALLA SCUOLA. DISCUSSIONE INTORNO A SETTE TEMI:
9 febbraio 2018 - IIS USUELLI-RUZZA - Padova
http://www.cesp-pd.it/spip/spip.php?article1464
Dai sistemi di valutazione agli effetti sull'etica dei comportamentiGiuseppe De Nicolao
Slide dell'interventod di Giuseppe De Nicolao al convegno "Frode Scientifica, come nasce e come si previene", Venerdì 17 e Sabato 18 Novembre a Pavia. Partecipazione gratuita, previa registrazione obbligatoria http://www-3.unipv.it/max3/fs/programma-1.html
Terza missione: è lei la prima vittima della "cultura della valutazione"?Giuseppe De Nicolao
Intervento di Giuseppe De Nicolao al Convegno "Culture della valutazione. Università e Terza Missione. Conoscenza, formazione, territorio°. IULM, Martedì 10 OTTOBRE 2017
P. Galimberti: Valutazione/classificazione delle riviste scientificheGiuseppe De Nicolao
Intervento di Paola Galimberti (Università degli Studi di Milano) nel WORKSHOP INTERNO AIPDA (ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA DEI PROFESSORI DI DIRITTO AMMINISTRATIVO)
LA VALUTAZIONE DELLE RIVISTE
dalla Scientificità alla Classificazione
(Ragioni, Metodi, Modelli, Impatto)
13 gennaio 2017, Milano, ore 11.15-17.00 Università Milano IULM
Sala delle Conferenze-VI° piano-IULM 1-Via Carlo Bo, 1
ANVUR ASN
Bibliometria Bufale Benito
CRUI Cattaneo Checchi Costituzione Cingolani Cantone Consiglio di Stato Cammellate Coda colpo di
Diritto allo studio Declino Duce
Elena Cattaneo ERC
Ferraro/ Figlio di MIUR/Fascia A Formazione Feticismo
Graziosi/ Giannini
Human Technopole
IIT Impact Factor Inguscio immortale innovativi
Junk arithmetic
K
Londra radio Licenza di copiare Ludi dipartimentali
Miccoli Manfredi
Natta Cattedre nannicini Nature
OCSE Oro alla Patria Omonimie
Perquisizioni Primavera PISA Pavia PRRR! Professionalizzanti Premiale
Quinlan
Renzi - Referendum Rignano Science Foundation Rottamazione del Sud
Stop-VQR Sole 24 Ore Scatti
Turchia Tasse Times Higher Education Tesoretto IIT Truppe Terremoto
Ultimi OCSE Uomo quasi immortale
VQR fantasma Viesti
W Roars
Xylella
Y
Blob Roars 2015, di tutto, di più. Un anno di università e ricerca attraverso una selezione delle copertine di Roars
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Eua pfo-report-december-2017
1. EMBARGOED VERSION 11 Dec. 2017
Public Funding Observatory
Report 2017
December 2017
Enora Bennetot Pruvot, Thomas Estermann and Veronika Kupriyanova
42. EMBARGOED VERSION 11 Dec. 2017
The European University Association (EUA) is the representative organisation of universities
and national rectors’ conferences in 47 European countries. EUA plays a crucial role in the
Bologna Process and in influencing EU policies on higher education, research and
innovation. Thanks to its interaction with a range of other European and international
organisations, EUA ensures that the independent voice of European universities is heard
wherever decisions are being taken that will impact their activities.
The Association provides a unique expertise in higher education and research, as well as a
forum for exchange of ideas and good practice among universities. The results of EUA’s
work are made available to members and stakeholders through conferences, seminars,
websites and publications.
www.EUA.eu | @euatweets