Ethics in ECMO
Panelists:
Dr Suneel Pooboni
Dr Venkat Goyal
Dr Pranay Oza
Vivek GUpta
Dr Dipanjan Chatterjee
Dr Nandkishore
Moderator:
Apran Chakraborthy
 No disclosures / conflict of interest
Goals
 Patient best interest
 Autonomy
 Informed consent
 Shared Decision making
 Surrogate decision making
 End of life care/ Advance directives
Principles of Ethics
 Beneficence : Good of patient comes first
 Non-Maleficence : First Do No Harm
 Autonomy : Patients have right to choose / refuse
treatment
 Justice : Scarce resources should be distributed fairly
Ethical principle & challenges during ECMO
 Limited evidences: Challenging Beneficence
 Expensive: Challenges Justice
 Addresses the definition of death: Challenges the integrity
 Mostly demand sedation: Challenges Autonomy
 Not a treatment: Challenges Non-maleficence
Current issues
 DNR but ECMO acceptable ?
 CPR acceptable but not ECMO
 Do not Intubate but ECCO2R acceptable
 Do not ECMO orders
 What does DNR means on VA ECMO ?
 Moral Distress
CASE 1
 48 year/ male, post-renal transplant with COVID ARDS, on
ventilator
 PCO2 > 140, Ph 6.8, PO2 44
 Norad/ Vasopressin/ Adrenaline
 Retrieval call ..100 km distance
 One episode of bradycardia, responded with adrenaline
purge
 On arrival, pupils B/L dilated and not reacting
CASE 2
 11 month old , Septic myocarditis with pneumonia, 21
days of ECMO
 CFTR gene came positive
 Need to change the oxygenator
 Parents does not want to continue further
CASE 3
 50 year old Male, severe COVID ARDS with PF ratio 0.5 after two
episodes of proning and 3 weeks of HFNO
 Shifted to our hospital
 Only one ECMO console is free
 Other all machines are occupied with least chance for getting
free for next few days
 At the same time, 22 year old Amlodipine poisioning came to
emergency after 18 hours of ingestion in shock
CASE 4
 62 year old, extensive covid fibrosis in CT, on VV
ECMO for 140 days
 Family counseled for lung transplant since 2
months, but they denied repeatedly
 He is awake, alert and communicating
 Repeated attempts failed for weaning
 Now landed in septic shock
 Family wants to escalate to VA support or
whatever more can be done
Challenges
 The patient : Being aware of fact of impending
death can be distressing and suffering
 The family: DNE/ Withdrawal decisions are
emotionally challenging for them for such pt
 Health care providers : Moral distress and close
ties with families for prolonged stay
CASE 5
 29 years, Male, 142 Kg Severe Viral ARDS, Non-
responder of proning on high mechanical ventilation
 Shifted to our hospital
 Rescued on VV ECMO
 Lungs are white even after 21 days
 Family belongs to a village and were arranging money
from village & relatives they have nothing to continue
treatment
 Hospital support
 Minimizing investigations
 Need for Crowd funding
 Consortium of ECMO survivors and their families
 Counselling is a continuous process
 All team members should take a single voice
Case 6
 65/M patient was brought in ED with cardiac arrest
 As per relative he had chest pain and just at the gate of ED he was
conscious
 The first identified rhythm was asystole
 Almost 20 mts had passed with high quality CPR with twicel VF
which was defibrillated… CPR in progress
 Relative are aware about ECMO, since one family member survived
on VA ECMO due to celphos poisoning with few minute CPR prior to
VA ECMO

Ethics of ECMO Panel discussion presentation 2024.pptx

  • 1.
    Ethics in ECMO Panelists: DrSuneel Pooboni Dr Venkat Goyal Dr Pranay Oza Vivek GUpta Dr Dipanjan Chatterjee Dr Nandkishore Moderator: Apran Chakraborthy
  • 2.
     No disclosures/ conflict of interest
  • 3.
    Goals  Patient bestinterest  Autonomy  Informed consent  Shared Decision making  Surrogate decision making  End of life care/ Advance directives
  • 4.
    Principles of Ethics Beneficence : Good of patient comes first  Non-Maleficence : First Do No Harm  Autonomy : Patients have right to choose / refuse treatment  Justice : Scarce resources should be distributed fairly
  • 5.
    Ethical principle &challenges during ECMO  Limited evidences: Challenging Beneficence  Expensive: Challenges Justice  Addresses the definition of death: Challenges the integrity  Mostly demand sedation: Challenges Autonomy  Not a treatment: Challenges Non-maleficence
  • 7.
    Current issues  DNRbut ECMO acceptable ?  CPR acceptable but not ECMO  Do not Intubate but ECCO2R acceptable  Do not ECMO orders  What does DNR means on VA ECMO ?  Moral Distress
  • 8.
    CASE 1  48year/ male, post-renal transplant with COVID ARDS, on ventilator  PCO2 > 140, Ph 6.8, PO2 44  Norad/ Vasopressin/ Adrenaline  Retrieval call ..100 km distance  One episode of bradycardia, responded with adrenaline purge  On arrival, pupils B/L dilated and not reacting
  • 11.
    CASE 2  11month old , Septic myocarditis with pneumonia, 21 days of ECMO  CFTR gene came positive  Need to change the oxygenator  Parents does not want to continue further
  • 13.
    CASE 3  50year old Male, severe COVID ARDS with PF ratio 0.5 after two episodes of proning and 3 weeks of HFNO  Shifted to our hospital  Only one ECMO console is free  Other all machines are occupied with least chance for getting free for next few days  At the same time, 22 year old Amlodipine poisioning came to emergency after 18 hours of ingestion in shock
  • 15.
    CASE 4  62year old, extensive covid fibrosis in CT, on VV ECMO for 140 days  Family counseled for lung transplant since 2 months, but they denied repeatedly  He is awake, alert and communicating  Repeated attempts failed for weaning  Now landed in septic shock  Family wants to escalate to VA support or whatever more can be done
  • 16.
    Challenges  The patient: Being aware of fact of impending death can be distressing and suffering  The family: DNE/ Withdrawal decisions are emotionally challenging for them for such pt  Health care providers : Moral distress and close ties with families for prolonged stay
  • 17.
    CASE 5  29years, Male, 142 Kg Severe Viral ARDS, Non- responder of proning on high mechanical ventilation  Shifted to our hospital  Rescued on VV ECMO  Lungs are white even after 21 days  Family belongs to a village and were arranging money from village & relatives they have nothing to continue treatment
  • 18.
     Hospital support Minimizing investigations  Need for Crowd funding  Consortium of ECMO survivors and their families  Counselling is a continuous process  All team members should take a single voice
  • 19.
    Case 6  65/Mpatient was brought in ED with cardiac arrest  As per relative he had chest pain and just at the gate of ED he was conscious  The first identified rhythm was asystole  Almost 20 mts had passed with high quality CPR with twicel VF which was defibrillated… CPR in progress  Relative are aware about ECMO, since one family member survived on VA ECMO due to celphos poisoning with few minute CPR prior to VA ECMO