Ethical Implications of Social Media Data Mining by Police University of Maryland University College (UMUC) Group Epsilon Group Epsilon Executive Summary Introduction History Current Trends Alternatives Conclusion References 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Group Epsilon EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Social media is constantly inundated with posts that contain rich and timely information about events relevant to public safety Social media can be used track people as they move from one location to the next Software can be deployed to identify key words like “gun”, “fight”, and “shoot” to track posts that are indicative of danger and/or criminal activity The goal of these programs and the partnership with law enforcement is to bypass privacy options of the social media sites Social media data mining has great potential to make policing more proactive – But is it legal? Ethical? Authorities are already using social media, such as posts and comments, to store information and to keep tabs on people Facebook and Instagram oppose this effort 3 Group Epsilon INTRODUCTION Is social media data mining ethical? Should the government and law enforcement agencies be legally authorized to undermine resident privacy in an effort to prevent/deter crime? What is the public’s reasonable expectation of privacy? Is social data mining considered a warrantless search? Social media posts are public – does that make it legal and ethical to monitor an individual’s posts over a period of time? Law enforcement agencies should reveal what data they are collecting, how it is being collected, and what it is being used for Public education/engagement about this effort should be mandatory! Clear guidelines and regulations must be imposed on this process! 4 Group Epsilon HISTORY 100 Representatives attended a Social Media networking workshop. Included federal, state, and local governments, private sector, and news media (to share case studies for learning). Two goals to help emergency management learn how to: Better protect communities. Improve communication during crisis situations. Police have been increasingly using social media 76% to gain tips on crime 72% to monitor public 70% for intelligence gathering 5 Group Epsilon HISTORY (cont.) California fires in 2018 used real-time updates on evacuations and effected areas via social media outlets Used to be done by TV and Radio which not everyone got the information. Amber Alerts posted on Facebook and twitter to increase exposure. Jurys using social media during trials is astoundingly high. Juror was “friending” female defendant and got out of jury duty. Results in numerous new trials and overturned verdicts. Arkansas Supreme Court reverses capital murder conviction because of juror repeatedly tweeted comments during trial. 6 Group Epsilon Social Media posts can be loaded with useful data for policing. This data can assist law enforcement with: Quicker Interventions – Crime Prevention, Incid.