ER&L 2014: DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•732 views
UConn Libraries PDA program is quite successful from an acquisitions perspective, but access to DRM-encased e-books is a less than ideal user experience. This presentation describes how UConn Libraries worked to provide access to thousands of DRM-free e-books while only purchasing titles with highest use.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (16)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (18)
Similar to ER&L 2014: DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books
Similar to ER&L 2014: DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
ER&L 2014: DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books
- 1. DDA 2.0: Evidence-Based Selection of E-Books Galadriel Chilton University of Connecticut galadriel.chilton@lib.uconn.edu Photo Credit: Redfishingboat (Mick O) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
- 2. UConn Libraries PDA program is quite successful from an acquisitions perspective, but access to DRM-encased e- books is a less than ideal user experience. This presentation describes how UConn Libraries worked is working to provide access to thousands of DRM-free e- books while only purchasing titles with highest use.
- 3. Photo Credit: neurollero Where have we been? Why DDA 2.0?
- 4. 66,685 Accessible Titles Out of 15,013 Titles Used… - 14,596 Short Term Loans - 417 Purchases
- 5. Photo Credit: Darren Tunnifliff
- 9. “Thanks very much for these links. However, I must share my feedback that this e-reader format is quite possibly the worst publication format that I have yet come across. In printing off the full chapters I wanted, some suddenly were truncated and every one had many page duplications, probably a result of subsections being defined part way through the page. I’m sure that this affected the number of pages I was allowed to print off too. The normal SpringerLink format would have been a thousand times better. I take what I can get, of course.” Assistant Professor Jonathan L Klassen Molecular and Cell Biology February 21, 2014
- 11. Photo Credit: Melanie O.
- 14. Photo Credit: Rusty Clark
- 15. Photo Credit: Novartis AG
- 16. Current Profile Specs: Books Over $100 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Percent Use by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013 Taylor & Francis 29% Wiley 16% Springer 10% Elsevier 7% Cambridge Univ. Press 4% Oxford Univ. Press 3% ABC-CLIO 2%
- 17. Taylor and Francis 24% Wiley 23% Elsevier 11% Springer 6% Cambridge Univ. Press 5% Oxford Univ. Press 4% De Gruyter 3% Current Profile Specs: Books Over $100 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Percent $pend by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013
- 18. Current Profile Specs: Books up to $99.99 Imprint of 3 Years to Present Excludes Textbooks 3 Short Term Loans, 4th Triggers Purchase Wiley 17% Palgrave Macmillan 9% Cambridge Univ. Press 6% Princeton Univ. Press 5% Elsevier 4% Univ. of Chicago Press 4% Oxford Univ. Press 3% Percent of Use by Publisher July 2011 – December 2013
- 20. DDA 2.0 Evidence-Based Acquisition of E-Books • Library pays a minimal deposit for 12-months of access to all of a publisher’s DRM-free e- books on the publisher’s platform • Library and publisher negotiate a minimum spend to be paid at end of 12 months • Library activates access to e-books (loads MARC records, etc.) • Library analyzes use at end of 12 months and purchases e-books with highest use to meet or exceed minimum spend. • Access to unpurchased e-books ends. • Library applies usage statistics gathered to help inform next fiscal year’s budget allocations. Photo Credit: Sepehr Ehsani
- 21. Photo Credit: W & J
- 22. Photo Credit: Mark Forman
- 23. Licensing Woes Funding determined / Price negotiated Faculty request curricular and/or research need Does vendor accept required CT contract terms? Need for e-resource confirmed Yes and under $3,000 Resource not acquired Forward license agreement and justification of need for acquisition to CT Attorney General / UConn Office of General Council for AG Review Proceed with license negotiation* Successful negotiating complete? Vendor signs documents • License Agreement • Ethics Forms+ • Signature Authority UConn countersigns license agreement per signature authority designation policy No Invoice received and payment processed Resource access activated Hard copies filed and to AG/OGC if AG/OGC reviewed (Records Retention: term of license +7 years) Signed documents added to CORAL AG/OGC signature if AG/OGC reviewed license November 12, 2013 Yes and over $3,000 Signed documents added to KFS +Greater than $50,000, Less than $500,000: OPM 1 and 5 Form C +Greater $500,000: OPM 1, 5,6, and 7 Form C g. chilton / d. sanford Photo Credit: NASA
- 25. Photo Credit: Salim Virji
- 32. Photo Credit: Ed Callow
- 33. or e-book Photo by Betsy Weber