Houeida Kammourié-Charara
InfoCommons Librarian
Lebanese American University
Zoë Loveland
Director – Academic Segment Planning for Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America
ProQuest
Vickery, B C. Scientific Communication in History. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2000.
Vickery, B C. Scientific Communication in History. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2000.
Borrowed from Daniel Forsman at Stellenbosch Symposium 2013 who borrowed from Lars Juhl Jensen
http://www.slideshare.netlarsjuhljensen/mining-biomedical-texts
Borrowed from Maslow and BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23902918
Borrowed from Tony Davies ‘Ebooks Down Under’ Charleston
Conference
2013https://www.dropbox.com/s/dpsb3v6jk3xy6gr/Charleston%20Ebooks%20
Down%20Under.pptx
Monograph budgets in decline – squeeze by electronic journals,
databases, etc.
Lack of space in the library
Cost of keeping books on shelves
Web – changing users expectations
Use of print monographs low and in decline
Rise in expenditure on Interlibrary loan
Stretched resources
The Economy
7
Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines eBook as “a
book composed in or converted to digital
format for display on a computer screen or
handheld device”.
“An e-book is an electronic book that can be read
digitally on a computer screen, a special e-
book reader, a personal digital assistant
(PDA), or even a mobile phone” (Nelson, 2008).
 Portability: A large number of eBooks can be
carried in a portable device.
 Download-ability: Download chapters or
sections to a device for later use.
 Interactivity: Annotating, bookmarking
and highlighting.
 Simplicity: Ease of use of dedicated
eBook readers and Mobile devices.
 Searchability: Search within and across
eBook content.
 Timeliness: Fast access to relevant
content via keywords searching.
 Practicality: eBooks can be used anytime and
everywhere.
 Accessibility: eBooks provide an easy way of
accessing work at patrons
convenience and leisure.
 Cultural resistance mainly from “Digital
immigrants”
Piracy of eBook content
Ownership of eBook content
 Constraint of DRM software
 Acquisition/Cataloging processes and
decisions are time consuming
 Negotiating licenses for each different
platform and/or individual books.
 “libraries with foreign credit cards may be
unable to obtain certain titles” (Walters,
2013).
 Printing/Downloading restrictions are hard to
identify
 Cut-and-paste often disabled
 “previously acquired e-books may become
inaccessible if the user crosses into a
nation where the original license agreement
is not in force” (Walters, 2013).
 Subscription
 Purchase
 Subject Based Package
 Patron Driven
Acquisition (PDA) or
 Demand-Driven
Acquisition (DDA)
 Title by Title
 Pay-per-View
 Firm Order
 Number of Users
 Consortia Deals
Members of the Lebanese Academic Library Consortium (LALC) are working
together on subscribing to eBooks packages, such as ebrary, Safari, etc.
However purchasing eBooks and sharing them among LALC members is not
yet foreseeable.
 In AP librarians identify the parameters for new
titles (subject area, publisher, price, etc.), and the
vendors send fitting titles to the library which
review them for approval or rejection.
 AP profiles can be used for PDA offerings.
 Reduces cost of title acquisition.
 Over a period of perhaps 5 years, most
institutions, will have some money budgeted to
PDA, (Esposito, 2012).
PDA/DDA not yet practiced at Lebanese Libraries; Some libraries
are considering it so far.
Checkout
model
One user can lend
one title at a time,
unless library has
several copies to
satisfy demand.
Unlimited
access
Allowing
several users to
use the same
title at a time.
2012 EPUB3
2010 EPUB 2.0.1
2007 EPUB 2.0 (close replica of print)
1999 Open eBook Publication Structure
(OEBPS)
MOBI, KF8, AZW and more…
“EPUB3 is an open standard that can be consumed on
multiple devices- computers, laptops, tablets,
dedicated e-readers, and smartphones-from multiple
vendors” (Polanka, 2013).
DRM is like a lock and key for digital content. The
media is locked, and you have to have the key to
unlock it. Imagine you purchased a DVD that works in
your home player; then your player breaks, you buy
another one, and your DVD will not play in it.
“It prevents legitimate customers from doing what
they want with their content while doing absolutely
nothing to the people who acquired the same content
illegally” (Griffey, 2010).
The most compelling reasons to bypass Digital Rights
Management is by purchasing eBooks hosted on the
publisher’s site.
“The preservation of e-books is especially difficult
because each e-book consists of several distinct
elements:
 Content and formatting of the work itself
 File format
 Software needed to access and use the file
 Operating system needed to run the software,
 Hardware compatible with the operating system”.
Gale Standing order for LAU is an example.
A pilot project of ILL of eBooks is currently in motion. It is a
collaboration between Texas Tech University, the University
of Hawaii at Manoa and the Greater Western Library Alliance
and Springer:
Occam's Reader
A software program (working with ILLiad) that allows
interlibrary loan of ebooks.
Currently working with .PDF documents only, with plans to
support other formats of electronic books and to develop a
stand-alone, web-based version of the system.
Sue Polanka identified three main vendor types:
Publishers: Direct price negotiation with no
intermediary. This process requires staff time, mainly
for licensing.
Aggregators: An Aggregator represents several
publishers, therefore will renegotiate with all publishers
any change in business models, or license terms.
Wholesalers: These are similar to aggregators because
they negotiate the licenses and track billing and
ordering (and shipping for print titles). But most do not
have an eBook interface, thus they sell access to eBooks
from multiple aggregators.
Publishers that
offer content
directly to
libraries
Elsevier
Oxford University
Press
Royal Society of
Chemistry
Springer
Cambridge University
Press
Specialist
aggregator
Knovel (engineering)
Safari (management
and technology)
Alexander Street Press
(social sciences and
humanities)
Large
aggregators
Dawsonera
EBL and ebrary
(ProQuest)
EBSCO (formerly
NetLibrary)
MyiLibrary (a
subsidiary of Ingram).
JSTOR
Project MUSE
Library
vendors (P+E)
Blackwell
Coutts
Swets
YBP
 Title Selection:
 Titles to be shifted/purchased are selected by Concerned
Librarians with the approval of the University Librarian.
 Content evaluation (excerpt/portion/one or two chapters
preview) through:
 Trial via IP (preferably) sent to all@lau, or via username and
password.
 Licensing: Before ordering, the library negotiates the
license agreement and makes sure Perpetual
Access/Archival Rights clause is to the benefit of the
library; and the cost of online format is justifiable.
 Ordering: Once ordered, and upon activation, the product
will be added to the Libraries website and an email to
all@lau will be sent to promote the newly added resource.
•Vendor’s version
of DRM is a major
barrier to eBooks
implementation.
•Librarians should
investigate the
license agreement
carefully.
DRM
• Addressing eBook
requires involvement
of IT units, librarians,
college stores,
faculty, and students.
• Any resentment from
any stakeholder, may
slow down the
process.
Cooperation
• Printing/Downloading
capabilities are not
unified among
publishers.
• This should be
investigated and
negotiated during
licensing process.
Printing
Understand your needs and goals:
 Space: Library needs to assign more space to students
 Meet Demand: Students are asking for more seats/PCs
 Extend print access: Circulate the Reference collection
 Specialized collection curation: Theses and
dissertation (I.R.)
Define your values and expectations
 Ownership vs. access: Having access to information is
more critical to users than owning the info.
 Libraries & ROI?
 What do you want to achieve? Our main goal is our
user satisfaction.
Set a budget and timeframe
 Founded in 1999 by Kevin Sayar &
Christopher Warnock
 Variety of models, products, and
services
◦ Subscription (ebrary pioneered
this e-book model)
◦ Perpetual archive
◦ Patron-driven acquisition
◦ Short-term loans
◦ SaaS and DASH!
 2011 became a ProQuest business
• Company founded in 1997 by Australian
booksellers
• EBL launched in 2004
• Variety of models, products, and services
• Perpetual Access
• Non-linear Lending Model (EBL
pioneered this e-book model)
• Demand-driven Acqusition (EBL
pioneered this model)
• Short-term loans (EBL pioneered
this model)
• May 2013 became a ProQuest business
Choice ∙ Experience ∙ Integration
Innovation ∙ Value ∙ Support
Researcher
PublisherLibrary
Discovery
Access
Research Tools
Maximise
Dissemination &
Revenue
Optimise Budget &
Streamline
Workflow
ILS VENDORS
• Intota
• OCLC
• Other ILS
vendors
SSO AND
AUTHENTICATION
• EZProxy
• Athens
• Shibboleth
ebrary/
EBL
BOOK VENDORS
• YBP
• Coutts
DISCOVERY
• Summon
• PQ platform
• Other Discovery
Services
[PA] Perpetual Archive
84% of titles have multiple
concurrent access
Extended Access™ for
single-user titles
Non-Linear™ Lending
Multiple simultaneous access
at or near hardback price
[SUB] Subscription
Affordable base, unlimited multi-user
access and continued growth
Subscriptions based on specific
industries, engineering disciplines,
business skills, and corporate
departments
[PDA/DDA]
Patron/Demand-driven
Acquisition
Just in time, not just in case
Sophisticated profiling tools
Flexible Short-term Loans (STL)
options
Diversifying models
aids in collection
development and
shows the greatest ROI
PDA/DDA
PA
SUB
32
ISBNs – Cleaning, Matching, Reporting
Benefits – No duplicates, Space Saving, Collection
Development, Strategic Acquisition (Sub, DDA, Purchase,
NLL), Discounts, High Use
Several Lebanese academic libraries started the
purchase of eBooks, No official statistics yet.
Lack of financial means is influencing libraries not to
invest in eBooks.
Librarians may want to see how others are dealing
with eBooks, eBooks readers, platforms etc. before going live.
LAU Libraries were pioneersin circulating
eBooks readers/Tablets among students in academic
libraries in Lebanon.
Image Source:
http://www.itwebafrica.com/images/stories/ebookskenya.jpg
EReader Location Date received
# of Loans
2012
# of Loans
2014
% increase
Kindle 2.0.2 RNL 19-Feb-10 16 21 31.25%
Kindle DX Wireless (9.7") BY 7-Apr-10 0 2 0%
Sony reader RNL 13-Jan-11 2 3 50%
iPad RNL 17-Jan-11 481 796 65.48%
iPad RNL 17-Jan-11 501 808 61.27%
iPad BY 21-Jan-11 72 193 168.00%
iPad 2 RNL 25-Oct-11 106 566 439.04%
iPad 2 RNL 25-Oct-11 0 729 0%
iPad 2 BY 24-Jan-12 30 214 613.33%
Kindle 6.2.1 (kindlefire) RNL 30-Jan-12 0 8 0%
iPad 3 RNL 20-Feb-13 - 184 N/A
iPad 2 BY 10-Aprl-13 - 28 N/A
iPad 2 BY 2-Dec-13 - 9 N/A
iPad 3 BY 2-Dec-13 - 10 N/A
Conversion of print book (p-book) to e-book started
in 2000 with Encyclopaedia Britannica …ongoing process
2010-2011 # of eBooks: 121,553
2011-2012 # of eBooks: 137,208
2012-2013 # of eBooks: 182,126
Source: SerialsSolutions
Ebrary and SAFARI are entered as one entry in OPAC;
Springer is added at the title level.
OPAC Entries
Libraries need to expect and
embrace change with all its
challenges and opportunities.
Implementing eBooks successfully
is challenge #1in this decade.
Carreiro, E. (2010). Electronic books: How digital devices and supplementary new technologies are
changing the face of the publishing industry. Publishing Research Quarterly, 26(4), 219-235.
Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/815l71g801370q2u/
E-book. Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e-book
Esposito, J. (2012). The Faculty’s Role in Patron-driven Acquisitions, The Scholarly Kitchen.
Retrieved February 28, 2014, from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/08/the-
facultys-role-in-patron-driven-acquisitions/
Griffey, J. (2010). Electronic book readers. Library Technology Reports, 46(3), 7-19, 2. Retrieved
February 10, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/202709359?accountid=27870
Kelley, M., Fialkoff, F., & Miller, R. (2011). The ebook opportunity. Library Journal, 136(19), 36-n/a.
Retrieved February 20, 2014, from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/902852500?accountid=27870
Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B., & Wilson, J. (2011, May). UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage
Survey. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from
http://www.cdlib.org/services/uxdesign/docs/2011/academic_ebook_usage_survey.pdf
Miller, R. (2011). Dramatic growth. Library Journal, 136(17), 32-32. Retrieved February 11, 2014,
from http://search.proquest.com/docview/896338418?accountid=27870
Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause
Review, 43(2). Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/e-
books-higher-education-nearing-end-era-hype.
Polanka, S., (Ed.). (c2011). No shelf required: E-books in libraries. Chicago: American Library
Association.
Polanka, S. (2013). What Librarians Need to Know About EPUB3. Online Searcher, 70-72.
http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ul_pub/159
Polanka, S. (2011). Purchasing E-books in libraries: A maze of opportunities and challenges. Library
Technology Reports, 47(8), 4-7, 58. Retrieved February 17, 2014, from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/908429942?accountid=27870.
Price, J. S. (2011). Patron driven acquisition of publisher-hosted content: Bypassing DRM. Retrieved
March 1, 2012, from
http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=library_staff.
Rapp, D. (2011). Digital Book World Panels Tackle Libraries. Library Journal, 136(4),16. Retrieved
March 1, 2012, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/ljinprint/currentissue/889052-
403/infotech_digital_book_world_panels.html.csp
Walters, W. H. (2013). E-books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Acquisition and
Collection Management. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2). 187–211.
Please feel free to contact us
@
houeida.charara@lau.edu.lb & zoe.loveland@proquest.com
A copy of this presentation will be available online on slideShare
http://www.slideshare.net/houeidakam/
Nesbitt said "People who are digital natives, if they can't find it
through the library they are going to go elsewhere…” (Kelley, M.,
Fialkoff, F., & Miller, R. 2011).

Ebooks challenges and opportunities in academic library: A case study from the Lebanese American University and ProQuest

  • 1.
    Houeida Kammourié-Charara InfoCommons Librarian LebaneseAmerican University Zoë Loveland Director – Academic Segment Planning for Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America ProQuest
  • 2.
    Vickery, B C.Scientific Communication in History. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2000.
  • 3.
    Vickery, B C.Scientific Communication in History. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2000.
  • 4.
    Borrowed from DanielForsman at Stellenbosch Symposium 2013 who borrowed from Lars Juhl Jensen http://www.slideshare.netlarsjuhljensen/mining-biomedical-texts
  • 5.
    Borrowed from Maslowand BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23902918
  • 6.
    Borrowed from TonyDavies ‘Ebooks Down Under’ Charleston Conference 2013https://www.dropbox.com/s/dpsb3v6jk3xy6gr/Charleston%20Ebooks%20 Down%20Under.pptx
  • 7.
    Monograph budgets indecline – squeeze by electronic journals, databases, etc. Lack of space in the library Cost of keeping books on shelves Web – changing users expectations Use of print monographs low and in decline Rise in expenditure on Interlibrary loan Stretched resources The Economy 7
  • 9.
    Merriam-Webster Dictionary defineseBook as “a book composed in or converted to digital format for display on a computer screen or handheld device”. “An e-book is an electronic book that can be read digitally on a computer screen, a special e- book reader, a personal digital assistant (PDA), or even a mobile phone” (Nelson, 2008).
  • 10.
     Portability: Alarge number of eBooks can be carried in a portable device.  Download-ability: Download chapters or sections to a device for later use.  Interactivity: Annotating, bookmarking and highlighting.  Simplicity: Ease of use of dedicated eBook readers and Mobile devices.
  • 11.
     Searchability: Searchwithin and across eBook content.  Timeliness: Fast access to relevant content via keywords searching.  Practicality: eBooks can be used anytime and everywhere.  Accessibility: eBooks provide an easy way of accessing work at patrons convenience and leisure.
  • 12.
     Cultural resistancemainly from “Digital immigrants” Piracy of eBook content Ownership of eBook content  Constraint of DRM software  Acquisition/Cataloging processes and decisions are time consuming  Negotiating licenses for each different platform and/or individual books.
  • 13.
     “libraries withforeign credit cards may be unable to obtain certain titles” (Walters, 2013).  Printing/Downloading restrictions are hard to identify  Cut-and-paste often disabled  “previously acquired e-books may become inaccessible if the user crosses into a nation where the original license agreement is not in force” (Walters, 2013).
  • 14.
     Subscription  Purchase Subject Based Package  Patron Driven Acquisition (PDA) or  Demand-Driven Acquisition (DDA)  Title by Title  Pay-per-View  Firm Order  Number of Users  Consortia Deals Members of the Lebanese Academic Library Consortium (LALC) are working together on subscribing to eBooks packages, such as ebrary, Safari, etc. However purchasing eBooks and sharing them among LALC members is not yet foreseeable.
  • 15.
     In APlibrarians identify the parameters for new titles (subject area, publisher, price, etc.), and the vendors send fitting titles to the library which review them for approval or rejection.  AP profiles can be used for PDA offerings.  Reduces cost of title acquisition.  Over a period of perhaps 5 years, most institutions, will have some money budgeted to PDA, (Esposito, 2012). PDA/DDA not yet practiced at Lebanese Libraries; Some libraries are considering it so far.
  • 16.
    Checkout model One user canlend one title at a time, unless library has several copies to satisfy demand. Unlimited access Allowing several users to use the same title at a time.
  • 17.
    2012 EPUB3 2010 EPUB2.0.1 2007 EPUB 2.0 (close replica of print) 1999 Open eBook Publication Structure (OEBPS) MOBI, KF8, AZW and more… “EPUB3 is an open standard that can be consumed on multiple devices- computers, laptops, tablets, dedicated e-readers, and smartphones-from multiple vendors” (Polanka, 2013).
  • 18.
    DRM is likea lock and key for digital content. The media is locked, and you have to have the key to unlock it. Imagine you purchased a DVD that works in your home player; then your player breaks, you buy another one, and your DVD will not play in it. “It prevents legitimate customers from doing what they want with their content while doing absolutely nothing to the people who acquired the same content illegally” (Griffey, 2010). The most compelling reasons to bypass Digital Rights Management is by purchasing eBooks hosted on the publisher’s site.
  • 19.
    “The preservation ofe-books is especially difficult because each e-book consists of several distinct elements:  Content and formatting of the work itself  File format  Software needed to access and use the file  Operating system needed to run the software,  Hardware compatible with the operating system”. Gale Standing order for LAU is an example.
  • 20.
    A pilot projectof ILL of eBooks is currently in motion. It is a collaboration between Texas Tech University, the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the Greater Western Library Alliance and Springer: Occam's Reader A software program (working with ILLiad) that allows interlibrary loan of ebooks. Currently working with .PDF documents only, with plans to support other formats of electronic books and to develop a stand-alone, web-based version of the system.
  • 21.
    Sue Polanka identifiedthree main vendor types: Publishers: Direct price negotiation with no intermediary. This process requires staff time, mainly for licensing. Aggregators: An Aggregator represents several publishers, therefore will renegotiate with all publishers any change in business models, or license terms. Wholesalers: These are similar to aggregators because they negotiate the licenses and track billing and ordering (and shipping for print titles). But most do not have an eBook interface, thus they sell access to eBooks from multiple aggregators.
  • 22.
    Publishers that offer content directlyto libraries Elsevier Oxford University Press Royal Society of Chemistry Springer Cambridge University Press Specialist aggregator Knovel (engineering) Safari (management and technology) Alexander Street Press (social sciences and humanities) Large aggregators Dawsonera EBL and ebrary (ProQuest) EBSCO (formerly NetLibrary) MyiLibrary (a subsidiary of Ingram). JSTOR Project MUSE Library vendors (P+E) Blackwell Coutts Swets YBP
  • 23.
     Title Selection: Titles to be shifted/purchased are selected by Concerned Librarians with the approval of the University Librarian.  Content evaluation (excerpt/portion/one or two chapters preview) through:  Trial via IP (preferably) sent to all@lau, or via username and password.  Licensing: Before ordering, the library negotiates the license agreement and makes sure Perpetual Access/Archival Rights clause is to the benefit of the library; and the cost of online format is justifiable.  Ordering: Once ordered, and upon activation, the product will be added to the Libraries website and an email to all@lau will be sent to promote the newly added resource.
  • 24.
    •Vendor’s version of DRMis a major barrier to eBooks implementation. •Librarians should investigate the license agreement carefully. DRM • Addressing eBook requires involvement of IT units, librarians, college stores, faculty, and students. • Any resentment from any stakeholder, may slow down the process. Cooperation • Printing/Downloading capabilities are not unified among publishers. • This should be investigated and negotiated during licensing process. Printing
  • 25.
    Understand your needsand goals:  Space: Library needs to assign more space to students  Meet Demand: Students are asking for more seats/PCs  Extend print access: Circulate the Reference collection  Specialized collection curation: Theses and dissertation (I.R.) Define your values and expectations  Ownership vs. access: Having access to information is more critical to users than owning the info.  Libraries & ROI?  What do you want to achieve? Our main goal is our user satisfaction. Set a budget and timeframe
  • 26.
     Founded in1999 by Kevin Sayar & Christopher Warnock  Variety of models, products, and services ◦ Subscription (ebrary pioneered this e-book model) ◦ Perpetual archive ◦ Patron-driven acquisition ◦ Short-term loans ◦ SaaS and DASH!  2011 became a ProQuest business • Company founded in 1997 by Australian booksellers • EBL launched in 2004 • Variety of models, products, and services • Perpetual Access • Non-linear Lending Model (EBL pioneered this e-book model) • Demand-driven Acqusition (EBL pioneered this model) • Short-term loans (EBL pioneered this model) • May 2013 became a ProQuest business
  • 27.
    Choice ∙ Experience∙ Integration Innovation ∙ Value ∙ Support
  • 28.
  • 29.
    ILS VENDORS • Intota •OCLC • Other ILS vendors SSO AND AUTHENTICATION • EZProxy • Athens • Shibboleth ebrary/ EBL BOOK VENDORS • YBP • Coutts DISCOVERY • Summon • PQ platform • Other Discovery Services
  • 31.
    [PA] Perpetual Archive 84%of titles have multiple concurrent access Extended Access™ for single-user titles Non-Linear™ Lending Multiple simultaneous access at or near hardback price [SUB] Subscription Affordable base, unlimited multi-user access and continued growth Subscriptions based on specific industries, engineering disciplines, business skills, and corporate departments [PDA/DDA] Patron/Demand-driven Acquisition Just in time, not just in case Sophisticated profiling tools Flexible Short-term Loans (STL) options Diversifying models aids in collection development and shows the greatest ROI PDA/DDA PA SUB
  • 32.
    32 ISBNs – Cleaning,Matching, Reporting Benefits – No duplicates, Space Saving, Collection Development, Strategic Acquisition (Sub, DDA, Purchase, NLL), Discounts, High Use
  • 33.
    Several Lebanese academiclibraries started the purchase of eBooks, No official statistics yet. Lack of financial means is influencing libraries not to invest in eBooks. Librarians may want to see how others are dealing with eBooks, eBooks readers, platforms etc. before going live. LAU Libraries were pioneersin circulating eBooks readers/Tablets among students in academic libraries in Lebanon. Image Source: http://www.itwebafrica.com/images/stories/ebookskenya.jpg
  • 34.
    EReader Location Datereceived # of Loans 2012 # of Loans 2014 % increase Kindle 2.0.2 RNL 19-Feb-10 16 21 31.25% Kindle DX Wireless (9.7") BY 7-Apr-10 0 2 0% Sony reader RNL 13-Jan-11 2 3 50% iPad RNL 17-Jan-11 481 796 65.48% iPad RNL 17-Jan-11 501 808 61.27% iPad BY 21-Jan-11 72 193 168.00% iPad 2 RNL 25-Oct-11 106 566 439.04% iPad 2 RNL 25-Oct-11 0 729 0% iPad 2 BY 24-Jan-12 30 214 613.33% Kindle 6.2.1 (kindlefire) RNL 30-Jan-12 0 8 0% iPad 3 RNL 20-Feb-13 - 184 N/A iPad 2 BY 10-Aprl-13 - 28 N/A iPad 2 BY 2-Dec-13 - 9 N/A iPad 3 BY 2-Dec-13 - 10 N/A
  • 35.
    Conversion of printbook (p-book) to e-book started in 2000 with Encyclopaedia Britannica …ongoing process 2010-2011 # of eBooks: 121,553 2011-2012 # of eBooks: 137,208 2012-2013 # of eBooks: 182,126 Source: SerialsSolutions Ebrary and SAFARI are entered as one entry in OPAC; Springer is added at the title level.
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Libraries need toexpect and embrace change with all its challenges and opportunities. Implementing eBooks successfully is challenge #1in this decade.
  • 38.
    Carreiro, E. (2010).Electronic books: How digital devices and supplementary new technologies are changing the face of the publishing industry. Publishing Research Quarterly, 26(4), 219-235. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/815l71g801370q2u/ E-book. Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e-book Esposito, J. (2012). The Faculty’s Role in Patron-driven Acquisitions, The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved February 28, 2014, from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/08/the- facultys-role-in-patron-driven-acquisitions/ Griffey, J. (2010). Electronic book readers. Library Technology Reports, 46(3), 7-19, 2. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/202709359?accountid=27870 Kelley, M., Fialkoff, F., & Miller, R. (2011). The ebook opportunity. Library Journal, 136(19), 36-n/a. Retrieved February 20, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/902852500?accountid=27870 Li, C., Poe, F., Potter, M., Quigley, B., & Wilson, J. (2011, May). UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://www.cdlib.org/services/uxdesign/docs/2011/academic_ebook_usage_survey.pdf Miller, R. (2011). Dramatic growth. Library Journal, 136(17), 32-32. Retrieved February 11, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/896338418?accountid=27870
  • 39.
    Nelson, M. R.(2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause Review, 43(2). Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/e- books-higher-education-nearing-end-era-hype. Polanka, S., (Ed.). (c2011). No shelf required: E-books in libraries. Chicago: American Library Association. Polanka, S. (2013). What Librarians Need to Know About EPUB3. Online Searcher, 70-72. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ul_pub/159 Polanka, S. (2011). Purchasing E-books in libraries: A maze of opportunities and challenges. Library Technology Reports, 47(8), 4-7, 58. Retrieved February 17, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/908429942?accountid=27870. Price, J. S. (2011). Patron driven acquisition of publisher-hosted content: Bypassing DRM. Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=library_staff. Rapp, D. (2011). Digital Book World Panels Tackle Libraries. Library Journal, 136(4),16. Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/ljinprint/currentissue/889052- 403/infotech_digital_book_world_panels.html.csp Walters, W. H. (2013). E-books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Acquisition and Collection Management. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2). 187–211.
  • 40.
    Please feel freeto contact us @ houeida.charara@lau.edu.lb & zoe.loveland@proquest.com A copy of this presentation will be available online on slideShare http://www.slideshare.net/houeidakam/ Nesbitt said "People who are digital natives, if they can't find it through the library they are going to go elsewhere…” (Kelley, M., Fialkoff, F., & Miller, R. 2011).