ECE 300 Module 8: Community Health Fair Date Due: November 13, 2022 Points Possible: 50 All children benefit from a safe, healthy environment. The environment in which a child learns and grows encompasses more than the classroom or childcare setting and extends to the home and community. Educators of young children must take an active role to ensure the children in their care have access to nutritious food and are being raised in a community and home that meet the children’s safety and health care needs. Part 1 Health Fair Flyer For this assignment, develop a community health fair based upon your field experience school and classroom communities. Select 5-8 community organizations to invite to have a booth at the fair. Create a flyer or invitation for families and community members. The community health fair should include resources and information pertaining to health, safety, and nutrition for children birth to age 3. The flyer should be double-sided and include a schedule of events on one side, and a description of the organizations that will be present on the other. For each booth, state its objective or purpose on the flyer. Examples of community organizations and/or booths include, but are not limited to, police and fire departments, medical professionals and clinics, and cooking demonstrations. Part 2 Reflection In a 250- to 500-word reflection, address how a community health fair benefits the lives of young children and their families. Include how the stakeholders in the community support the common good and align with the Christian worldview perspective. Reflect on how this event supports children’s development and learning in a collaborative effort with families and the community. Support your findings with a minimum of three resources. Submit Part 1 and Part 2 as one submission. While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. 11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance 1/6 Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L Workforce Compensation & Training Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Compensation and Training of Production Workers Base Wage (% change) Incentive Pay ($/pair) Fringe Benefits ($/year) Best Practices ($/worker) Supervisory Staff (ratio of workers to supervisors) Supervisory Compensation (% change) NORTH AMERICA FACILITY +1% $1.00 $3,000 $600 50 to 1 0% 0% .

1. ECE 300 Module 8: Community Health Fair
Date Due: November 13, 2022
Points Possible: 50
All children benefit from a safe, healthy environment. The
environment in which a child learns and grows encompasses
more than the classroom or childcare setting and extends to the
home and community. Educators of young children must take an
active role to ensure the children in their care have access to
nutritious food and are being raised in a community and home
that meet the children’s safety and health care needs.
Part 1 Health Fair Flyer
For this assignment, develop a community health fair based
upon your field experience school and classroom communities.
Select 5-8 community organizations to invite to have a booth at
the fair.
Create a flyer or invitation for families and community
members. The community health fair should include resources
and information pertaining to health, safety, and nutrition for
children birth to age 3.
The flyer should be double-sided and include a schedule of
events on one side, and a description of the organizations that
will be present on the other. For each booth, state its objective
or purpose on the flyer.
Examples of community organizations and/or booths include,
but are not limited to, police and fire departments, medical
professionals and clinics, and cooking demonstrations.
Part 2 Reflection
In a 250- to 500-word reflection, address how a community
health fair benefits the lives of young children and their
families. Include how the stakeholders in the community
support the common good and align with the Christian
worldview perspective. Reflect on how this event supports
children’s development and learning in a collaborative effort

2. with families and the community.
Support your findings with a minimum of three resources.
Submit Part 1 and Part 2 as one submission.
While APA style format is not required for the body of this
assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text
citations and references should be presented using
documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style
Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A
link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in
Class Resources if you need assistance.
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports
https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance
1/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L
Workforce Compensation & Training Year 11 Year 12 Year 13
Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Compensation
and Training
of Production
Workers
Base Wage (% change)
Incentive Pay ($/pair)
Fringe Benefits ($/year)

3. Best Practices ($/worker)
Supervisory Staff (ratio of workers to supervisors)
Supervisory Compensation (% change)
NORTH AMERICA FACILITY
+1%
$1.00
$3,000
$600
50 to 1
0%
0%
$1.00
$3,000
$1,000
50 to 1
+1%
0%
$1.00
$3,000
$1,000
50 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.50

4. $0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.50
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
Compensation
and Training
of Production
Workers
Base Wage (% change)
Incentive Pay ($/pair)
Fringe Benefits ($/year)
Best Practices ($/worker)
Supervisory Staff (ratio of workers to supervisors)
Supervisory Compensation (% change)
EUROPE-AFRICA FACILITY
0%
$0.00
$0
$0

5. 0 to 1
0%
0%
$0.00
$0
$0
0 to 1
0%
0%
$0.00
$0
$0
50 to 1
0%
+1%
$1.00
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.00
$0
$7,500

6. 40 to 1
+1%
Compensation
and Training
of Production
Workers
Base Wage (% change)
Incentive Pay ($/pair)
Fringe Benefits ($/year)
Best Practices ($/worker)
Supervisory Staff (ratio of workers to supervisors)
Supervisory Compensation (% change)
ASIA-PACIFIC FACILITY
+1%
$0.50
$1,536
$400
50 to 1
0%
0%
$0.50
$1,536
$800
50 to 1

7. +1%
0%
$0.50
$1,536
$800
50 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.00
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.00
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
Compensation
and Training
of Production
Workers
Base Wage (% change)
Incentive Pay ($/pair)

8. Fringe Benefits ($/year)
Best Practices ($/worker)
Supervisory Staff (ratio of workers to supervisors)
Supervisory Compensation (% change)
LATIN AMERICA FACILITY
0%
$0.00
$0
$0
0 to 1
0%
0%
$0.00
$0
$0
0 to 1
0%
0%
$0.00
$0
$0
50 to 1
0%
+1%

9. $1.00
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
+1%
$1.00
$0
$7,500
40 to 1
+1%
Branded Footwear Production Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14
Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Branded
Production
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
TQM / 6-Sigma ($/pair)
Anticipated Y15 Materials
Prices ($ per pair)
Standard
Superior
Branded Pairs to be Manufactured (000s)

10. NORTH AMERICA FACILITY
44.00%
200
$10
$1.70
4,733
$6.00
$12.00
60.00%
250
$14
$1.70
5,700
$6.00
$13.28
70.00%
250
$14
$1.80
3,300
$6.67
$13.30
50.00%
300

11. $4
$5.00
4,300
$6.11
$11.94
50.00%
300
$4
$5.00
4,300
$6.79
$12.43
Branded
Production
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
TQM / 6-Sigma ($/pair)
Anticipated Y15 Materials
Prices ($ per pair)
Standard
Superior
Branded Pairs to be Manufactured (000s)
EUROPE-AFRICA FACILITY
0.00%

12. 0
$0
$0.00
0
$6.00
$12.00
0.00%
0
$0
$0.00
0
$6.00
$13.28
70.00%
0
$14
$1.80
2,000
$6.67
$13.30
46.00%
300
$4
$5.00

13. 1,900
$6.11
$11.94
46.00%
300
$4
$5.00
1,900
$6.79
$12.43
Branded
Production
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
TQM / 6-Sigma ($/pair)
Anticipated Y15 Materials
Prices ($ per pair)
Standard
Superior
Branded Pairs to be Manufactured (000s)
ASIA-Pacific FACILITY
64.00%
200

14. $10
$1.70
4,749
$6.00
$12.00
86.00%
250
$14
$1.70
5,700
$6.00
$13.28
70.00%
250
$14
$1.80
3,300
$6.67
$13.30
46.00%
300
$10
$5.00
5,500
$6.11

15. $11.94
46.00%
300
$10
$5.00
5,500
$6.79
$12.43
Branded
Production
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
TQM / 6-Sigma ($/pair)
Anticipated Y15 Materials
Prices ($ per pair)
Standard
Superior
Branded Pairs to be Manufactured (000s)
LATIN AMERICA FACILITY
0.00%
0
$0
$0.00

16. 0
$6.00
$12.00
0.00%
0
$0
$0.00
0
$6.00
$13.28
70.00%
0
$14
$1.80
2,400
$6.67
$13.30
46.00%
300
$4
$5.00
1,900
$6.11
$11.94

17. 46.00%
300
$4
$5.00
1,900
$6.79
$12.43
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 1
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports
https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance
2/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L
Production Facilities Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Production
Equipment
Purchase of
Equipment
New (000s of pairs)
Refurb (000s of prs)
Sale of Equipment (000s of prs)

18. Production
Imprvmnt
Options
Option A (reject rate reduction)
Option B (setup cost reduction)
Option C (S/Q rating increase)
Option D (productivity increase)
Construction of Additional Space (000s of pairs)
NORTH AMERICA FACILITY
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
500
250
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0

19. 2,000
No
No
No
No
0
1,250
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
Production
Equipment
Purchase of
Equipment

20. New (000s of pairs)
Refurb (000s of prs)
Sale of Equipment (000s of prs)
Production
Imprvmnt
Options
Option A (reject rate reduction)
Option B (setup cost reduction)
Option C (S/Q rating increase)
Option D (productivity increase)
Construction of Additional Space (000s of pairs)
EUROPE-AFRICA FACILITY
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No

21. No
2,000
2,000
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0

22. Production
Equipment
Purchase of
Equipment
New (000s of pairs)
Refurb (000s of prs)
Sale of Equipment (000s of prs)
Production
Imprvmnt
Options
Option A (reject rate reduction)
Option B (setup cost reduction)
Option C (S/Q rating increase)
Option D (productivity increase)
Construction of Additional Space (000s of pairs)
ASIA-PACIFIC FACILITY
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
500

23. 250
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
2,000
No
No
No
No
0
2,250
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0

24. No
No
No
No
0
Production
Equipment
Purchase of
Equipment
New (000s of pairs)
Refurb (000s of prs)
Sale of Equipment (000s of prs)
Production
Imprvmnt
Options
Option A (reject rate reduction)
Option B (setup cost reduction)
Option C (S/Q rating increase)
Option D (productivity increase)
Construction of Additional Space (000s of pairs)
LATIN AMERICA FACILITY
0
0
0
No
No

25. No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
2,000
2,000
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No

26. 0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
Branded Distribution Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Pairs Shipped
from Facility
to (000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
NORTH AMERICA FACILITY
2,102
2,300
0
0
2,202
2,310
0

27. 0
2,402
210
281
212
3,000
1,154
0
0
3,000
1,154
0
0
Pairs Shipped
from Facility
to (000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
EUROPE-AFRICA FACILITY
0
0
0
0
0
0

28. 0
0
300
1,576
0
0
0
1,702
0
152
0
1,702
0
152
Pairs Shipped
from Facility
to (000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
ASIA-PACIFIC FACILITY
700
0
1,869
1,700

29. 700
0
1,869
1,804
300
100
1,880
746
0
1,100
3,000
1,141
0
1,100
3,000
1,141
Pairs Shipped
from Facility
to (000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
LATIN AMERICA FACILITY
0
0
0

30. 0
0
0
0
0
0
951
400
900
0
0
0
1,854
0
0
0
1,854
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 2
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports
https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance
3/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L

31. Inventory Clearance Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Percentage of Pairs
Cleared
(from prior-year inventory)
North America
Europe-Africa
Asia-Pacific
Latin America
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
50%
50%
100%
25%
50%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%

32. Internet Marketing Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Internet
Marketing
Decisions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
Competitive
Assumptions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
NORTH AMERICA MARKET
$78.00
$5,000
Yes
$67.00
$5,000
None
$86.00
$7,250
Yes
$72.17
$4,958

33. Few
$88.00
$5,000
Yes
$73.98
$5,729
Few
$76.00
$0
Yes
$76.18
$5,458
Few
$76.00
$0
Yes
$75.47
$6,792
Some
Internet
Marketing
Decisions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping

34. Competitive
Assumptions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
EUROPE-AFRICA MARKET
$83.00
$5,000
Yes
$72.00
$4,500
None
$86.00
$5,000
Yes
$76.08
$4,500
Few
$88.00
$5,000
Yes
$79.31
$5,396
Few
$82.50

35. $0
Yes
$83.10
$5,438
Few
$82.50
$0
Yes
$82.58
$6,063
Few
Internet
Marketing
Decisions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
Competitive
Assumptions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
ASIA-PACIFIC MARKET
$75.00
$4,000

36. Yes
$67.00
$4,000
None
$83.00
$7,250
Yes
$69.67
$4,042
Few
$84.00
$5,000
Yes
$71.06
$4,792
Few
$74.00
$0
Yes
$74.72
$5,271
Few
$74.00
$0

37. Yes
$74.45
$5,667
Some
Internet
Marketing
Decisions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
Competitive
Assumptions
Retail Price ($ per pair)
Search Engine Ads ($000s)
Free Shipping
LATIN AMERICA MARKET
$78.00
$4,000
Yes
$72.00
$4,000
None
$83.00
$6,500
Yes
$75.75
$3,917

38. Few
$84.00
$5,000
Yes
$78.77
$4,833
Few
$78.50
$0
Yes
$81.23
$5,146
Few
$78.50
$0
Yes
$80.50
$5,479
Some
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 3
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports

39. https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance
4/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L
Wholesale Marketing Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Wholesale
Marketing
Decisions
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
Competitive
Assumptions
S/Q Rating
Model Availability
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
NORTH AMERICA MARKET
$49.00
$10,000
$5.00
2

40. $4,250
4.0★
200
$48.00
$10,000
$5.00
3.0
$4,000
$53.00
$10,000
$5.00
2
$4,500
4.7★
209
$49.87
$10,958
$5.10
2.7
$4,125
$63.00
$10,000
$5.00
2

41. $4,500
5.8★
257
$52.63
$12,167
$5.30
2.6
$4,083
$54.00
$13,000
$5.00
2
$5,000
5.5★
318
$55.67
$14,375
$5.30
2.6
$3,833
$54.00
$13,000
$5.00
2

42. $5,000
5.6★
374
$55.04
$14,625
$4.90
2.4
$3,708
Wholesale
Marketing
Decisions
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
Competitive
Assumptions
S/Q Rating
Model Availability
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
EUROPE-AFRICA MARKET
$54.00

43. $9,000
$5.00
2
$4,250
4.0★
200
$53.00
$9,000
$5.00
3.0
$4,000
$56.00
$9,000
$5.00
2
$4,500
4.8★
218
$54.71
$9,958
$4.80
2.8
$4,042
$63.00
$9,000
$5.00

44. 2
$4,500
5.1★
244
$56.79
$10,458
$4.80
2.8
$4,042
$59.00
$9,000
$5.00
2
$5,000
5.4★
308
$61.13
$12,542
$5.20
2.7
$4,000
$59.00
$9,000
$5.00

45. 2
$5,000
5.7★
368
$59.00
$12,667
$5.10
2.6
$4,104
Wholesale
Marketing
Decisions
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
Competitive
Assumptions
S/Q Rating
Model Availability
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)

46. ASIA-PACIFIC MARKET
$50.00
$8,000
$5.00
2
$3,000
4.0★
200
$48.00
$8,000
$5.00
3.0
$2,750
$52.00
$8,000
$5.00
2
$3,250
4.8★
224
$48.87
$8,542
$4.80
2.8
$2,854
$60.00

47. $8,000
$5.00
2
$3,250
5.2★
253
$51.29
$10,583
$5.30
2.6
$3,146
$53.00
$8,500
$5.00
2
$3,500
5.2★
326
$55.44
$11,625
$5.20
2.3
$3,208
$53.00

48. $8,500
$5.00
2
$3,500
5.4★
366
$53.46
$12,000
$5.00
2.4
$3,125
Wholesale
Marketing
Decisions
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)
Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
Competitive
Assumptions
S/Q Rating
Model Availability
Wholesale Price ($ per pair)
Brand Advertising ($000s)
Rebate Offer ($ per pair)
Delivery Time (weeks)

49. Retailer Support ($ per outlet)
LATIN AMERICA MARKET
$56.00
$7,500
$5.00
2
$3,000
4.0★
200
$53.00
$7,500
$5.00
3.0
$2,750
$57.00
$7,500
$5.00
2
$3,250
4.8★
224
$54.12
$7,792
$4.80
2.8
$2,813

50. $60.00
$7,500
$5.00
2
$3,250
5.1★
239
$56.21
$9,792
$5.10
2.7
$3,042
$56.00
$11,000
$5.00
2
$3,500
5.3★
318
$60.27
$12,792
$5.00
2.4
$3,313

51. $56.00
$11,000
$5.00
2
$3,500
5.6★
359
$58.10
$13,750
$5.00
2.4
$3,188
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 4
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports
https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance
5/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L
Private-Label Production Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14
Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Private-Label
Specs

52. Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
Pairs to be
Produced &
Shipped to
(000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
NORTH AMERICA FACILITY
56.00
6
$5
0
0
0
0
56.00
6
$5
0
0
0
0
56.00
6

53. $5
0
0
0
0
12.00
0
$4
500
0
0
0
12.00
0
$4
500
0
0
0
Private-Label
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
Pairs to be
Produced &

54. Shipped to
(000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
EUROPE-AFRICA FACILITY
0.00
0
$0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
$0
0
0
0
0
60.00
14
$5
0
0
0
0

55. 10.00
0
$4
0
500
0
0
10.00
0
$4
0
500
0
0
Private-Label
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
Pairs to be
Produced &
Shipped to
(000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse

56. Latin America Warehouse
ASIA-PACIFIC FACILITY
30.00
12
$4
0
0
0
0
30.00
12
$4
0
0
0
0
30.00
12
$4
0
0
0
0
16.00
0
$4
0

57. 0
500
0
16.00
0
$4
0
0
500
0
Private-Label
Specs
Superior Materials %
Number of Models / Styles
Styling/Features ($000/model)
Pairs to be
Produced &
Shipped to
(000s)
North America Warehouse
Europe-Africa Warehouse
Asia-Paific Warehouse
Latin America Warehouse
LATIN AMERICA FACILITY
0.00
0

58. $0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
$0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0
$2
0
0
0
0
10.00
0
$4
0
0
0
500
10.00

59. 0
$4
0
0
0
500
Private-Label Contract Offers Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14
Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Pairs Offered for Sale (000s)
Price Offer ($ per pair)
Incorporate Projected Outcomes
NORTH AMERICA MARKET
0
$32.00
No
0
$32.00
No
0
$32.00
No
489
$40.00

60. No
489
$40.00
Yes
Pairs Offered for Sale (000s)
Price Offer ($ per pair)
Incorporate Projected Outcomes
EUROPE-AFRICA MARKET
0
$37.00
No
0
$37.00
No
0
$37.00
No
493
$40.00
No
493
$40.00

61. Yes
Pairs Offered for Sale (000s)
Price Offer ($ per pair)
Incorporate Projected Outcomes
ASIA-PACIFIC MARKET
0
$32.00
No
0
$32.00
No
0
$32.00
No
482
$40.00
No
482
$40.00
Yes
Pairs Offered for Sale (000s)
Price Offer ($ per pair)

62. Incorporate Projected Outcomes
LATIN AMERICA MARKET
0
$37.00
No
0
$37.00
No
0
$37.00
No
493
$40.00
No
493
$40.00
Yes
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 5
11/8/22, 6:16 PM BSG Decisions & Reports
https://www.bsg-online.com/users/program/v3/decisions/finance

63. 6/6
Industry 52 DECISION HISTORY — All Years Company L
Celebrity Endorsements Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year
15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Contract Offer
($000s)
Judy Judge
Kimmie Jimmel
Bud Birkenstock
Jose Montana
Samuelle Jackson
Bronko Mars
Steff Caraway
Jay XYZ
Nunchuck Norris
Roger Federation
Nick Shavan
Anderson Blooper
Mic Jagermeister
Jim Hardball
LaBron Game
Flint Westwood
Offer Priority Judy Judge
Kimmie Jimmel
Bud Birkenstock
Jose Montana
Samuelle Jackson
Bronko Mars
Steff Caraway
Jay XYZ
Nunchuck Norris
Roger Federation

64. Nick Shavan
Anderson Blooper
Mic Jagermeister
Jim Hardball
LaBron Game
Flint Westwood
Spending Cap on Contracts ($000s)
$0
$500
$0
$0
$0
$500
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

65. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
0
0
0
0
0
0

66. 0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
$15,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
0
0
0
0
0

67. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,100
$1,200
$0
$1,300
$0
$1,500
$0
$1,400
$0
0
0

68. 0
0
0
0
0
5
4
0
3
0
1
0
2
0
$6,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
0

69. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
CSRC Initiatives Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Charitable
Contributions
Total $ (before taxes)
% of Pretax Profit
Improved Working
Conditions
Cafeteris/Child Care
Vent./Lighting/Safety
Recycled Boxing/Packaging
Energy Efficiency Initiatives
Ethics Training/Enforcement

70. Supplier Code of Conduct
No
$100
$0
0%
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
$100
$0
0%
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
$100
$0
0%
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
$500

71. $0
4%
Yes
No
No
No
No
$500
$0
4%
Yes
No
No
No
Finance and Cash Flow Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year
15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20
Sources of
Additional
Cash
1-Year Loan
5-Year Loan
10-Year Loan
Stock Issue (000s of shares)
$0
$0
$0
0
$40,000

72. $0
$0
0
$0
$0
$200,000
0
$0
$200,000
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
0
Uses for
Excess
Cash
Early Repayment of
Long-Term Loans
Dividend ($ per share)
Stock Repurchase (000s shrs)
None
None
$0.00

73. 0
None
None
$0.00
0
None
None
$0.00
0
None
None
$0.00
200
None
None
$0.00
0
Decision History Copyright © GLO-BUS Software, Inc.
Printed 08-Nov-22 at 6:16 PM — Page 6
MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making

74. Decision Log Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
After completing each simulation with your team, you will
individually document in a decision log the reasoning behind
your company’s strategy
by explaining why you and your co-manager(s) chose to make
the decisions and changes that you did in this module’s
simulations.
You will submit a journal entry for each simulation (two per
module, in Modules 2–6), totalling ten entries. However,
individual entries will not be
graded in each module. Instead, the Decision Log Journal will
be assessed as a whole after the completion of all the required
simulations in
Module 6.
Note: If your company scores poorly in the industry, an
exemplary Decision Log may replace your Business Strategy
Game Industry Score up to
a maximum of 90%.
Prompt
For each Decision Log Journal Entry, be sure to complete the
following:
1. First, for each journal entry, reflect on how you think the
decisions for the year went in about one or two paragraphs.
Specifically, address
the following:
a. Describe the major changes your company made
b. Explain why your company chose to make the decisions it did

75. c. Describe the outcomes of the changes or decisions your
company made
2. Then download and save a copy of this document for each
entry so you can edit the Strategy Decision Tracking Table on
page 2 to track
your decisions for each round and explain how each decision
fits with your company’s strategy. Be sure to include a detailed
description
of the decisions you track and a thorough explanation of how
they fit into your overall strategy.
For Example: One bullet point under a given region and market
segment might read as follows: “Increased the percentage of
superior
materials used to 70%. A differentiation strategy means having
higher-quality shoes, so we believed increasing the percentage
of
superior materials would be the best route to take.” This
example identifies a major decision made during the simulation
round and
explains how it fits in this company’s differentiation strategy.
To complete your journal entry for each decision year, you must
attach a saved, completed copy of the Strategy Decisions
Tracking
Table for that year’s decisions. It is recommended that you keep
a personal copy of each year’s saved table under original file
names as
a backup.
1

76. MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making
Strategy Decision Tracking Table
*You must attach a copy of this completed table for each
Decision Year Log Entry
Region Wholesale Internet Private Label
North America
Europe-Africa
Asia-Pacific
Latin America
2
MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Each journal entry should be about
one or two paragraphs in length and include an attached copy of
the completed
Strategy Decisions Tracking Table.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in
Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade

77. Center.
Critical
Elements
Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident (0%) Value
%
Decision
Year 11
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they

78. were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 12
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,

79. spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
3
MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making
Decision
Year 13
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,

80. grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 14
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific

81. major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 15

82. Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.

83. 10
4
MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making
Decision
Year 16
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they

84. were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 17
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,

85. spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 18
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also

86. explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
5
MGT 4337: Business Policy and Decision Making
Decision
Year 19
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific

87. major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.
10
Decision
Year 20

88. Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge of
business policy and decision making through
the explanation of the outcomes of specific
major business changes or decisions, and
through the explanation of how each decision
aligned with company strategies. Submission
is also free of errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization
and is presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format.
Clearly identifies major business
changes or decisions, explaining
why each decision was made and
what the outcomes were. Also
explains how each decision fits
into the company's strategy.
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization.
Identifies changes or decisions but
may not clearly explain why they
were made, what the outcomes
were, or why each decision fits into
the company's strategy. Submission
may have major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that negatively
impact readability and articulation of
main ideas.
Did not submit
journal entry.

89. 10
Total
100 %
6