Early Constitutional Controversies
In 1788, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, who had both played active roles at the Constitutional Convention, worked together to write
The Federalist Papers
, a series of articles originally published in New York newspapers to convince readers to back the ratification of the Constitution. Constitutional scholars often refer to these papers to gain an appreciation of the “original intention” of the Framers, how those men expected the federal government to operate under the Constitution, and the powers they sought to grant or deny the federal government. By the early 1790s, however, Hamilton and Madison had divided over basic constitutional questions such as whether or not the federal government could charter a national bank. The American electorate, which had ratified the Constitution, had split on the issue as well, dividing into rival Federalist and Republican parties.
For this assignment, explore
one
significant constitutional controversy, from the first two decades of the United States under the Constitution (1789 to 1821). Topics to consider include:
The incorporation of the Bank of the United States
Debt assumption
The Jay Treaty
The Alien and Sedition Acts
The Election of 1800
John Marshall’s use of judicial review
The Louisiana Purchase
The trial of Aaron Burr
Jefferson’s Embargo
Federalist opposition to the War of 1812
Missouri’s application for statehood
Describe opposing views of the topic under consideration, and explain how each side used the Constitution to support its position. Assess the validity of the two sides according to your own interpretation of the Constitution as well as according to how the Constitution and constitutional principles were understood at the time the controversy occurred.
The paper should draw from at least
one
primary source and
two
scholarly, secondary sources for a total of three sources (not including the Constitution itself). For assistance on the use of primary and secondary sources, please see sections 8.1 and 8.2 of the Ashford Writing Center. The secondary sources should be accessed through any of the academic databases available through the Ashford University library.
The paper must be three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least three scholarly resources (at least two of which can be found in the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.
.
Early Constitutional ControversiesIn 1788, Alexander Hamilton and .docx
1. Early Constitutional Controversies
In 1788, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, who had both
played active roles at the Constitutional Convention, worked
together to write
The Federalist Papers
, a series of articles originally published in New York
newspapers to convince readers to back the ratification of the
Constitution. Constitutional scholars often refer to these papers
to gain an appreciation of the “original intention” of the
Framers, how those men expected the federal government to
operate under the Constitution, and the powers they sought to
grant or deny the federal government. By the early 1790s,
however, Hamilton and Madison had divided over basic
constitutional questions such as whether or not the federal
government could charter a national bank. The American
electorate, which had ratified the Constitution, had split on the
issue as well, dividing into rival Federalist and Republican
parties.
For this assignment, explore
one
significant constitutional controversy, from the first two
decades of the United States under the Constitution (1789 to
1821). Topics to consider include:
The incorporation of the Bank of the United States
Debt assumption
The Jay Treaty
The Alien and Sedition Acts
The Election of 1800
John Marshall’s use of judicial review
The Louisiana Purchase
The trial of Aaron Burr
Jefferson’s Embargo
Federalist opposition to the War of 1812
Missouri’s application for statehood
Describe opposing views of the topic under consideration, and
2. explain how each side used the Constitution to support its
position. Assess the validity of the two sides according to your
own interpretation of the Constitution as well as according to
how the Constitution and constitutional principles were
understood at the time the controversy occurred.
The paper should draw from at least
one
primary source and
two
scholarly, secondary sources for a total of three sources (not
including the Constitution itself). For assistance on the use of
primary and secondary sources, please see sections 8.1 and 8.2
of the Ashford Writing Center. The secondary sources should be
accessed through any of the academic databases available
through the Ashford University library.
The paper must be three pages in length and formatted
according to APA style. You must use at least three scholarly
resources (at least two of which can be found in the Ashford
Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims
and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference
page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials,
visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources
tab on the left navigation toolbar.
