The document outlines the objectives and targets of a workshop. The workshop aims to address functional, social, institutional and national issues. It targets civil servants and aims to help them actualize themselves, expand their insights, develop knowledge, improve their institution's image, enrich their network, and obtain credit points or visit other countries for free. Without the workshop, understanding would be limited like blind men describing an elephant. The document then provides guidance on writing papers for seminars or journals, emphasizing synchronization with themes, originality, relevance, and academic weight based on theory, methodology and references.
literature review: a critical analysis and synthesis of existing researchAvucaldz87
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research and scholarly articles, books, and other sources related to a particular topic or research question. It is an essential component of academic writing, particularly in research papers, theses, and dissertations. The purpose of a literature review is to provide an overview, summary, and evaluation of the existing literature on a specific subject, highlighting gaps, controversies, and areas that require further investigation.
Here are key elements and purposes of a literature review:
Survey of Existing Literature:
A literature review involves systematically searching and reviewing the existing body of literature relevant to the chosen topic. This includes academic articles, books, conference papers, and other scholarly sources.
Identification of Key Themes and Trends:
The review aims to identify and analyze key themes, trends, and patterns within the literature. It helps researchers understand the current state of knowledge on the topic and how different studies contribute to the overall understanding.
Evaluation of Methodologies and Approaches:
Researchers assess the methodologies and approaches used in previous studies. This evaluation helps in understanding the strengths and limitations of different research methods and informs the researcher's own methodology.
Identification of Gaps and Contradictions:
A literature review reveals gaps, controversies, or contradictions in existing research. This identification helps researchers position their own work within the broader academic context and contributes to the rationale for their study.
Synthesis and Integration:
The literature review involves synthesizing information from various sources, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on the topic. It may involve categorizing studies, comparing findings, and presenting a coherent narrative.
Framework for Research Design:
The literature review guides the development of a research design by informing the choice of research questions, hypotheses, and methodologies. It helps researchers build on existing knowledge and design studies that address gaps or expand upon previous research.
Citation of Relevant Works:
Throughout the literature review, researchers cite relevant works to give credit to previous researchers and provide evidence to support their arguments and statements.
Establishing Credibility and Expertise:
By demonstrating a thorough understanding of the existing literature, researchers establish their credibility and expertise in the chosen field. This is crucial for gaining the trust of the academic community and readers.
A well-executed literature review is not just a summary of past research; it is a critical analysis that contributes to the development of new knowledge and understanding within a specific academic discipline or field of study.
A model for handling overloading of literature review process for social scienceSalam Shah
Literature review is an excruciating part in the process of research. It requires an analysis of
published material on the topic on interest. Moreover, for a new researcher, it is challenging
extract a great number of required objectives, including the problem identification,
no more great deal in this era of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), instead
overloading of the literature is a major problem and the great change to be handle. Often
postgraduate research students raise three questions to their peers and supervisors. First, how
many articles are sufficed for a good literature review? Second, how many past years
literature will be enough to meet the required level for a good literature review? And third,
this research paper a novel hypothetical model is proposed to answer first two questions; the
number of articles required for a good and reasonable literature review and number of years
backward the analysis of articles required for the same. Our results indicate that analysis of
data partially support our hypothetical model and its assumptions.
Keywords: literature review; hypothetical model; load reduction; proposal writing;
information systems.
This is on how to do literature review based on some experience in good journals. Literature review is an important phase in any research and must be given due importance .
Article review is a technique commonly used in academic and scholarly settings to critically evaluate and analyze research articles. The purpose of an article review is to assess the quality and significance of the research presented in the article, as well as to provide a summary and critique of its main points and findings. Here is a SAMPEL OF ARTICLE REVIEW that can be followed when conducting an article review.
Here is a general technique that can be followed when conducting an article review:
Read the article thoroughly: Start by reading the entire article carefully to gain a comprehensive understanding of its content. Take note of the research objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions presented.
Identify the main points: Determine the main arguments and key findings of the article. Look for the central research question or hypothesis being addressed and how the study was conducted to answer it.
Evaluate the methodology: Assess the appropriateness and rigor of the research methodology employed. Consider factors such as the study design, data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analysis techniques used. Evaluate whether the methodology supports the validity and reliability of the study's findings.
Analyze the results and conclusions: Examine the results and conclusions presented in the article. Evaluate whether the data analysis supports the research objectives and if the conclusions drawn are justified based on the results. Consider any limitations or potential biases that may impact the interpretation of the findings.
Consider the significance and contribution: Reflect on the significance and contribution of the research. Assess how the study adds to the existing body of knowledge in the field and whether it addresses gaps or advances understanding in a meaningful way.
Critique the article: Provide a critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Consider factors such as the clarity of the writing, the organization of ideas, the use of supporting evidence, and the overall impact of the research.
Summarize and conclude: Summarize the main points of the article and present your overall evaluation. Provide a balanced assessment of the article's strengths and weaknesses, highlighting areas for improvement or further research if necessary.
Remember to maintain an objective and constructive approach throughout the review process. Your goal is to provide a fair and informed evaluation of the article's content and methodology. Additionally, it can be helpful to refer to any specific guidelines or requirements provided by your instructor or the journal you are reviewing for, as they may have additional criteria or considerations to include in your review.
School leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the overall success and effectiveness of a school. Here are some key reasons highlighting the importance of school leadership:
Setting the Vision and Direction: Effective school leaders establish
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantitaEstelaJeffery653
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Besides selecting a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods approach, the proposal or study designer also needs to review the literature about a topic. This literature review helps to determine whether the topic is worth studying, and it provides insight into ways in which the researcher can limit the scope to a needed area of inquiry.
This chapter continues the discussion about preliminary considerations before launching into a proposal or project. It begins with a discussion about selecting a topic and writing this topic down so that the researcher can continually reflect on it. At this point, researchers also need to consider whether the topic can and should be researched. Then the discussion moves into the actual process of reviewing the literature; addressing the general purpose for using literature in a study; and then turning to principles helpful in designing literature into qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies.
THE RESEARCH TOPIC
Before considering what literature to use in a project, first identify a topic to study and reflect on whether it is practical and useful to undertake the study. The topic is the subject or subject matter of a proposed study, such as “faculty teaching,” “organizational creativity,” or “psychological stress.” Describe the topic in a few words or in a short phrase. The topic becomes the central idea to learn about or to explore.
There are several ways that researchers gain some insight into their topics when they are initially planning their research (our assumption is that the topic is chosen by the researcher and not by an adviser or committee member). One way is to draft a brief working title to the study. We are surprised at how often researchers fail to draft a title early in the development of their projects. In our opinion, the working or draft title becomes a major road sign in research—a tangible idea that the researcher can keep refocusing on and changing as the project goes on (see Glesne, 2015; Glesne & Peshkin, 1992). It becomes an orienting device. We find that, in our research, this topic grounds us and provides a sign of what we are studying, as well as a sign useful for conveying to others the central notion of the study. When students first provide their research project ideas to us, we often ask them to supply a working title if they do not already have one written down on paper.
How would this working title be written? Try completing this sentence: “My study is about . . .” A response might be, “My study is about at-risk children in the junior high,” or “My study is about helping college faculty become better researchers.” At this stage in the design, frame the answer to the question so that another scholar might easily grasp the meaning of the project. A common shortcoming of beginning researchers is that they frame their study in complex and erudite language. This perspective may result from reading published articles that have ...
Commonly Confused Aspects of Research Paper: Discussion PaperAhmed Alkhaqani
Background: Confusion about elements of a research paper is common among students. The key to writing a good research paper is to know these common elements and their definitions. Maybe find that writing a research paper is not as easy as it seems. There are many parts and steps to the process, and it can be hard to figure out what needs to do and when.
Objective: This article aims to teach these common aspects of a research paper to avoid common mistakes while drafting own.
Conclusion: Each section of the research paper serves a distinct purpose and highlights a different aspect of the research. However, before starting drafting the manuscript, having a clear understanding of each section's purposes will help avoid mistakes.
Discussion Reponses Needed150-200 words each (3 post total)RLyndonPelletier761
Discussion Reponses Needed
150-200 words each (3 post total)
Response #1
3. The papers are written by different authors, in markedly different styles. Can you identify what makes these papers "academic" (other than the fact that they are all published in reputable journals)? How do these papers differ from newspaper articles or blogs (that might or might not be written by experts)?
4. What adds credibility to these papers? What makes published papers an academic/scholarly resource as compared to sources like Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia, Investopedia, blogs, etc.?
The following provides my response to both questions:
In observing each of the three papers, it is noted that the differences in style and approach vary between each group of authors. Still, these papers are deemed as “academic works” through which they each meet the criteria to be accepted as such via the peer review process (Cornell University, 2021). Through this process, articles are examined by multiple other scholars, experts, or academic peers to be reviewed and commented on. Once these reviews agree to the validity and contribution to a field of research then they may be published and deemed as scholarly. Moreover, peer reviewed articles (like these) differ than sources collected from news or general interest pieces as they are not written by members of editorial staff or freelance writers (Cornell University, 2021). Per Cornell University (2021), these types of editorials or contributions to a topic generally are written with no specialty assumed and are written with the purpose of providing general information to appeal to a broad audience of concerned citizens.
5. What does this essay exercise teach you in terms of your own writing style, your own approach to research, and what improvements in your style/approach would help you become a better writer?
This essay exercise is teaching me (as I have not completed my essay) that my writing style is subject to change. One thing I learned is that there are many approach styles and each is dictated based on the purpose of the research being conducted. In evaluating each of the three articles, I found that though each article is similar in the field of study the motivation for the research leads the authors to present their research in a way that supports their purpose. For example, one work is presented as case study evaluation, the second was an exploration of a research question, and the third was an expansion of research for supportive information that is presented in the form of a literature review. As such, I observed different ways to present Headings, Abstracts, and Contextual Support. Moving forward, this exposure to different writing styles will help me better organize and tailor my own work for my intended audience. Any thoughts?
Resources:
Cornell University . (n.d.). Distinguishing scholarly from non-scholarly periodicals: A checklist of criteria: News & general interest. LibGuides. Retrieved September 14, 20 ...
KEBIJAKAN DAN STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN E-GOVERNMENT DI INDONESIAAwang ANWARUDDIN
Materi yang didasarkan pada Inpres No. 3 Tahun 2003 ini semoga bermanfaat untuk memperluas wawasan dan pengetahuan tentang pengembangan e-Gov di Indonesia.
literature review: a critical analysis and synthesis of existing researchAvucaldz87
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research and scholarly articles, books, and other sources related to a particular topic or research question. It is an essential component of academic writing, particularly in research papers, theses, and dissertations. The purpose of a literature review is to provide an overview, summary, and evaluation of the existing literature on a specific subject, highlighting gaps, controversies, and areas that require further investigation.
Here are key elements and purposes of a literature review:
Survey of Existing Literature:
A literature review involves systematically searching and reviewing the existing body of literature relevant to the chosen topic. This includes academic articles, books, conference papers, and other scholarly sources.
Identification of Key Themes and Trends:
The review aims to identify and analyze key themes, trends, and patterns within the literature. It helps researchers understand the current state of knowledge on the topic and how different studies contribute to the overall understanding.
Evaluation of Methodologies and Approaches:
Researchers assess the methodologies and approaches used in previous studies. This evaluation helps in understanding the strengths and limitations of different research methods and informs the researcher's own methodology.
Identification of Gaps and Contradictions:
A literature review reveals gaps, controversies, or contradictions in existing research. This identification helps researchers position their own work within the broader academic context and contributes to the rationale for their study.
Synthesis and Integration:
The literature review involves synthesizing information from various sources, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on the topic. It may involve categorizing studies, comparing findings, and presenting a coherent narrative.
Framework for Research Design:
The literature review guides the development of a research design by informing the choice of research questions, hypotheses, and methodologies. It helps researchers build on existing knowledge and design studies that address gaps or expand upon previous research.
Citation of Relevant Works:
Throughout the literature review, researchers cite relevant works to give credit to previous researchers and provide evidence to support their arguments and statements.
Establishing Credibility and Expertise:
By demonstrating a thorough understanding of the existing literature, researchers establish their credibility and expertise in the chosen field. This is crucial for gaining the trust of the academic community and readers.
A well-executed literature review is not just a summary of past research; it is a critical analysis that contributes to the development of new knowledge and understanding within a specific academic discipline or field of study.
A model for handling overloading of literature review process for social scienceSalam Shah
Literature review is an excruciating part in the process of research. It requires an analysis of
published material on the topic on interest. Moreover, for a new researcher, it is challenging
extract a great number of required objectives, including the problem identification,
no more great deal in this era of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), instead
overloading of the literature is a major problem and the great change to be handle. Often
postgraduate research students raise three questions to their peers and supervisors. First, how
many articles are sufficed for a good literature review? Second, how many past years
literature will be enough to meet the required level for a good literature review? And third,
this research paper a novel hypothetical model is proposed to answer first two questions; the
number of articles required for a good and reasonable literature review and number of years
backward the analysis of articles required for the same. Our results indicate that analysis of
data partially support our hypothetical model and its assumptions.
Keywords: literature review; hypothetical model; load reduction; proposal writing;
information systems.
This is on how to do literature review based on some experience in good journals. Literature review is an important phase in any research and must be given due importance .
Article review is a technique commonly used in academic and scholarly settings to critically evaluate and analyze research articles. The purpose of an article review is to assess the quality and significance of the research presented in the article, as well as to provide a summary and critique of its main points and findings. Here is a SAMPEL OF ARTICLE REVIEW that can be followed when conducting an article review.
Here is a general technique that can be followed when conducting an article review:
Read the article thoroughly: Start by reading the entire article carefully to gain a comprehensive understanding of its content. Take note of the research objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions presented.
Identify the main points: Determine the main arguments and key findings of the article. Look for the central research question or hypothesis being addressed and how the study was conducted to answer it.
Evaluate the methodology: Assess the appropriateness and rigor of the research methodology employed. Consider factors such as the study design, data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analysis techniques used. Evaluate whether the methodology supports the validity and reliability of the study's findings.
Analyze the results and conclusions: Examine the results and conclusions presented in the article. Evaluate whether the data analysis supports the research objectives and if the conclusions drawn are justified based on the results. Consider any limitations or potential biases that may impact the interpretation of the findings.
Consider the significance and contribution: Reflect on the significance and contribution of the research. Assess how the study adds to the existing body of knowledge in the field and whether it addresses gaps or advances understanding in a meaningful way.
Critique the article: Provide a critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Consider factors such as the clarity of the writing, the organization of ideas, the use of supporting evidence, and the overall impact of the research.
Summarize and conclude: Summarize the main points of the article and present your overall evaluation. Provide a balanced assessment of the article's strengths and weaknesses, highlighting areas for improvement or further research if necessary.
Remember to maintain an objective and constructive approach throughout the review process. Your goal is to provide a fair and informed evaluation of the article's content and methodology. Additionally, it can be helpful to refer to any specific guidelines or requirements provided by your instructor or the journal you are reviewing for, as they may have additional criteria or considerations to include in your review.
School leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the overall success and effectiveness of a school. Here are some key reasons highlighting the importance of school leadership:
Setting the Vision and Direction: Effective school leaders establish
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantitaEstelaJeffery653
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Besides selecting a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods approach, the proposal or study designer also needs to review the literature about a topic. This literature review helps to determine whether the topic is worth studying, and it provides insight into ways in which the researcher can limit the scope to a needed area of inquiry.
This chapter continues the discussion about preliminary considerations before launching into a proposal or project. It begins with a discussion about selecting a topic and writing this topic down so that the researcher can continually reflect on it. At this point, researchers also need to consider whether the topic can and should be researched. Then the discussion moves into the actual process of reviewing the literature; addressing the general purpose for using literature in a study; and then turning to principles helpful in designing literature into qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies.
THE RESEARCH TOPIC
Before considering what literature to use in a project, first identify a topic to study and reflect on whether it is practical and useful to undertake the study. The topic is the subject or subject matter of a proposed study, such as “faculty teaching,” “organizational creativity,” or “psychological stress.” Describe the topic in a few words or in a short phrase. The topic becomes the central idea to learn about or to explore.
There are several ways that researchers gain some insight into their topics when they are initially planning their research (our assumption is that the topic is chosen by the researcher and not by an adviser or committee member). One way is to draft a brief working title to the study. We are surprised at how often researchers fail to draft a title early in the development of their projects. In our opinion, the working or draft title becomes a major road sign in research—a tangible idea that the researcher can keep refocusing on and changing as the project goes on (see Glesne, 2015; Glesne & Peshkin, 1992). It becomes an orienting device. We find that, in our research, this topic grounds us and provides a sign of what we are studying, as well as a sign useful for conveying to others the central notion of the study. When students first provide their research project ideas to us, we often ask them to supply a working title if they do not already have one written down on paper.
How would this working title be written? Try completing this sentence: “My study is about . . .” A response might be, “My study is about at-risk children in the junior high,” or “My study is about helping college faculty become better researchers.” At this stage in the design, frame the answer to the question so that another scholar might easily grasp the meaning of the project. A common shortcoming of beginning researchers is that they frame their study in complex and erudite language. This perspective may result from reading published articles that have ...
Commonly Confused Aspects of Research Paper: Discussion PaperAhmed Alkhaqani
Background: Confusion about elements of a research paper is common among students. The key to writing a good research paper is to know these common elements and their definitions. Maybe find that writing a research paper is not as easy as it seems. There are many parts and steps to the process, and it can be hard to figure out what needs to do and when.
Objective: This article aims to teach these common aspects of a research paper to avoid common mistakes while drafting own.
Conclusion: Each section of the research paper serves a distinct purpose and highlights a different aspect of the research. However, before starting drafting the manuscript, having a clear understanding of each section's purposes will help avoid mistakes.
Discussion Reponses Needed150-200 words each (3 post total)RLyndonPelletier761
Discussion Reponses Needed
150-200 words each (3 post total)
Response #1
3. The papers are written by different authors, in markedly different styles. Can you identify what makes these papers "academic" (other than the fact that they are all published in reputable journals)? How do these papers differ from newspaper articles or blogs (that might or might not be written by experts)?
4. What adds credibility to these papers? What makes published papers an academic/scholarly resource as compared to sources like Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia, Investopedia, blogs, etc.?
The following provides my response to both questions:
In observing each of the three papers, it is noted that the differences in style and approach vary between each group of authors. Still, these papers are deemed as “academic works” through which they each meet the criteria to be accepted as such via the peer review process (Cornell University, 2021). Through this process, articles are examined by multiple other scholars, experts, or academic peers to be reviewed and commented on. Once these reviews agree to the validity and contribution to a field of research then they may be published and deemed as scholarly. Moreover, peer reviewed articles (like these) differ than sources collected from news or general interest pieces as they are not written by members of editorial staff or freelance writers (Cornell University, 2021). Per Cornell University (2021), these types of editorials or contributions to a topic generally are written with no specialty assumed and are written with the purpose of providing general information to appeal to a broad audience of concerned citizens.
5. What does this essay exercise teach you in terms of your own writing style, your own approach to research, and what improvements in your style/approach would help you become a better writer?
This essay exercise is teaching me (as I have not completed my essay) that my writing style is subject to change. One thing I learned is that there are many approach styles and each is dictated based on the purpose of the research being conducted. In evaluating each of the three articles, I found that though each article is similar in the field of study the motivation for the research leads the authors to present their research in a way that supports their purpose. For example, one work is presented as case study evaluation, the second was an exploration of a research question, and the third was an expansion of research for supportive information that is presented in the form of a literature review. As such, I observed different ways to present Headings, Abstracts, and Contextual Support. Moving forward, this exposure to different writing styles will help me better organize and tailor my own work for my intended audience. Any thoughts?
Resources:
Cornell University . (n.d.). Distinguishing scholarly from non-scholarly periodicals: A checklist of criteria: News & general interest. LibGuides. Retrieved September 14, 20 ...
KEBIJAKAN DAN STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN E-GOVERNMENT DI INDONESIAAwang ANWARUDDIN
Materi yang didasarkan pada Inpres No. 3 Tahun 2003 ini semoga bermanfaat untuk memperluas wawasan dan pengetahuan tentang pengembangan e-Gov di Indonesia.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
3. Sasaran Workshop
Pejabat fungsional memiliki peluang untuk
Mengakktualisasikan Diri
Memperluas Wawasan
Mengembangkan Pengetahuan
Meningkatkan Citra Lembaga
Memperkaya Jejaring kerja
Memperoleh ‘Credit Points’
Mengunjungi Negara lain secara gratis
22. •Sinkronisasi - sesuaikan
Judul dan Isi KTI dengan
Tema dan Sub-Tema Seminar
atau Jurnal;
S
•Asli – Orisinalitas ide/isi KTI
adalah mutlak dan
menentukan akseptibilitas;A
•Perlu – Tujuan utama KTI
adalah solusi terhadap
suatu permasalahan
fungsional, institusional,
nasional maupun global;
P
•Ilmiah – Bobot Ilmiah KTI
ditentukan oleh Teori,
Metodologi dan ReferensiI
23.
24. PROCEDURES USED TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES
Operational definition for the variables used (quantitative/qualitative);
Experimental design based upon objectives;
Universe of study;
Sample selection and size, unit of analysis and observation, selection
criteria;
For both probability samples and non-probability samples (samples of
convenience or grab samples) the investigator should indicate the
procedure and criteria used and justify the selection and size;
Description of intervention (program) to answer three fundamental
questions: Who will be responsible for the intervention? Where will it
take place? What activities will be performed, and with what frequency
and intensity?
Data collection procedures, instruments used, and methods for data
quality control.
25. The goal of the research process is to produce new knowledge or deepen
understanding of a topic or issue. This process takes three main forms, namely,
(1) Exploratory research, which helps to identify and define a problem or
question; (2) Constructive research, which tests theories and proposes solutions
to a problem or question; and (3) Empirical research, which tests the feasibility
of a solution using empirical evidence (Wikipedia, 2012). As the problem of e-
Leadership has not in nature been clearly defined yet, the method used in this
research is exploratory research.
The objective of exploratory research is ‘to gather preliminary information that
will help define problems and suggest hypotheses’ (Kotler & Armstrong, 2006).
Exploratory research often relies on secondary research such as reviewing
available literature and/or data, or qualitative approaches such as informal
discussions with employees or management, and more formal approaches
through in-depth interviews, focus groups, or case studies (Shields, Patricia and
Tajalli, 2006). As noted in Wikipedia (2012), the results of exploratory research
are not usually useful for decision-making by themselves, but they can provide
significant insight into a given situation. Although the results of qualitative
research can give some indication as to the "why", "how" and "when"
something occurs, it cannot tell us "how often" or "how many".
26. ELABORATING THEORY
Argumentation /grounds to support the central Question in the problem;
Possible answers suggested by others and critically assessed by you;
An exhaustive bibliographic review;
Ending in an hypothesis.
3.2. Understanding e-Leadership
Leadership is not limited only to a position or job; leadership covers a wider insight (Luthans
and Avolio, 2003). To be a leader one needs to have vision and imagination (Ciulla, 1997).
As Burke (2008) defines, leadership is "... the ability to bring people, tools and resources
together to solve problems and achieve results." But in the current global era, leadership
needs to go further. Leaders have to be capable of bringing people together despite
geographical, cultural and other limitations by utilizing ICT to achieve organizational goals
(Boudreau, 1998). Such leadership is called e-leadership, which might be simply defined as
the ability to bring people, tools and resources together by utilizing ICT to solve problems
and to achieve organizational goals.
27. Daftar Pustaka merupakan salah satu komponen KTI
yang penting dan mempengaruhi bobot ilmiah KTI.
Daftar Pustaka berisikan judul buku-buku, artikel-
artikel, jurnal, dan sumber bacaan lainnya, yang
digunakan sebagai rujukan atau acuan dalam
penyusunan KTI.
Tata cara penulisan daftar pustaka mengikuti aturan-
aturan dalam penulisan ilmiah, dan dilakukan secara
konsisten {Misalnya, Nama Belakang, Depan (Tahun).
Judul Buku. Kota: Penerbit}.
28. JUDUL KARYA TULIS ILMIAH
Oleh:
Nama widyaiswara
NIP
Pangkat/golongan
Jabatan
Nama Instansi
Kota, Tanggal, Bulan, Tahun
JUDUL KARYA TULIS ILMIAH
Oleh:
Nama widyaiswara
NIP
Pangkat/golongan
Jabatan
Nama Instansi
Kota, Tanggal, Bulan, Tahun
JUDUL KARYA TULIS ILMIAH
Oleh:
Nama widyaiswara
NIP
Pangkat/golongan
Jabatan
Nama Instansi
Kota, Tanggal, Bulan, Tahun
Aisonhaji (2008). E-leadership: Vital Success Factors of E-
Gov Implementation.
http://aisonhaji.wordpress.com/2008. Retrieved
December 1, 2008.
Allen, Barbara A., Luc Juillet, Gilles Paquet, and Jeffrey Roy
(2001). ‘E-Governance and Government Online in
Canada: Partnerships, People and Prospects’ in
Government Information Quarterly, 18, 93-104.
Avolio, B. (1999). Full Leadership Development Building the
Vital Forces in Organizations. New York, NY: Sage.
Anwaruddin, Awang (2005). ‘Improving Public Service
Delivery through Bureaucracy Reform’ in The Role of
Public Administration in Alleviating Poverty and
Improving Governance, edited by Jak Jabes. Manila:
ADB.
29. Pengutipan merupakan cara pengambilan istilah, kata atau
kalimat dari sebuah buku, majalah, atau ungkapan
pernyataan orang lain yang digunakan untuk melengkapi,
mendukung atau menolak pendapat atau landasan teori
yang dikemukakan oleh penulis di dalam KTI-nya.
Dalam merujuk penulis harus mencantumkan sumber
informasi yang dikutip agar tidak melanggar hak cipta.
• Leadership is not limited only to a position or job; leadership
covers a wider insight (Luthans and Avolio, 2003:3). To be a
leader one needs to have vision and imagination (Ciulla,
1997:131). As Burke (2008:2) defines, leadership is “... the
ability to bring people, tools and resources together to solve
problems and achieve results.”
30. Abstrak adalah deskripsi singkat tentang isi KTI secara keseluruhan, dan
terdiri dari 200-250 kata yang diketik satu spasi. Abstrak yang baik
mencakup alasan (fakta) permasalahan yang diangkat dan menentukan
judul KTI dan tujuan penulisan. Pada akhir penulisan, dimuat kata-kata
kunci (key words) yang berperan dalam abstrak.
Abstrak digunakan sebagai “jembatan” untuk memahami uraian yang akan
disajikan dalam suatu KTI, terutama untuk memahami permasalahannya.
Dari abstrak, pembaca dapat mengetahui jalan pikiran penulis KTI tersebut
dan mengetahui gambaran umum tulisan secara lengkap.
Biasanya abstrak ditempatkan di awal KTI dengan tujuan agar pembaca yang
ingin mengetahui isi KTI dengan cepat cukup membaca abstrak. Dalam
artikel ilmiah, abstrak ditulis setelah judul dan nama pengarang dan diketik
satu spasi. Untuk itulah, abstrak harus dapat mewakili isi karangan ilmiah
secara keseluruhan, mulai dari latar belakang, metode, dan hasil penelitian.
31.
32. PERANAN E-LEADERSHIP DALAM PENGEMBANGAN E-GOVERNMENT DI
INDONESIA
Abstract
The development of e-government in Indonesia is an effort to develop an
electronic-based government so as to improve the quality of public
services and to realize good governance. However, due to the complex
process during its development, e-government has not been implemented
successfully, especially in government institutions. Based on research on
best practices of e-government implementation in several regions, it is
found that the key factor in capacity building for e-government is strong
leadership that has the ability to manage personnel, equipment, and
other organizationalresources, and to use ICT to solve problems and
achieve the goals of organization. Such eadership is commonly known as
e-leadership.
Key words: e-government; public services; good governance; e-
leadership.
33. Penulisan Nomor untuk Bab dan Sub-Bab serta bagian-
bagian lainnya sangat penting karena hal itu dapat
menunjukkan peran masing-masing bagian dalam KTI.
Cara penulisan Nomor di dalam KTI umumnya
menggunakan Model Harvard, yang memadukan aksara
Romawi (Bab) dan Latin (Sub-Bab dan bagian lainnya).
BAB I
PENDAHULUAN
A. LATAR BELAKANG
1. Motif yang mendorong penelitian
a. Tuntutan Pekerjaan
1) Sebagai Widyaiswara pada Pusdiklat
a) Membantu pengembangan bidang Diklat
(1) Melakukan penelitian/kajian
(a) Membuat Karya Tulis Ilmiah
34. 3.3.2 The Regency of Sragen
The Sragen Regency is one of the pilot areas in the implementation of e-
government in Indonesia. The rapid development of ICT in the regency can
be seen from the rise of virtual worlds in society through the application
of remote Sragen Global Network (Nagios).
3.3.2.1 Strong political leadership with clear vision:
This aspect is very important in ensuring the successful implementation
of e-government. Strong political leadership is a proof of commitment to
leadership in the implementation of e-government.
3.3.2.2 Involvement of all parties:
Strong leadership has provided a good climate to raise mutual awareness
of the importance of support from all parties involved with
implementation of e-government. The initial phase is not without
obstacles.
35. •Metodologi – Merupakan komponen
utama KTI berisikan prosedur dalam
mencapai tujuan KTI;M
•Elaborasi & Ekploratif – Uraikan
diskusi dan argumentasi berdasar teori
dengan menggunakan kalimat yang
ekploratif
E
•Daftar Pustaka & Pengutipan – Setiap
pendapat atau penjelasan harus
didukung oleh referensi yang termuat
dalam Daftar Pustaka;
D
•Abstrak – Abstrak adalah intisari KTI
dan merupakan prasyarat utama dalam
penulisan KTI untuk Jurnal maupun
Seminar;
A
•Nomor – Penomoran di dalam sangat
penting karena mencerminkanalur pikir
penulis dan memudahkan pembaca KTI.N
Guru Patimpus, pendiri Kota Medan
36.
37. NAME Awang Anwaruddin is currently the Head of Research &
Development Centre of Information System and Public
Administration Automation (SIOAN), the National Institute
of Public Administration (LAN), the Republic of Indonesia.
Beside working as a structural official, he is also teaching
in several education and training programs for civil service.
Apart of his bueraucratic work, Awang writes various articles on Public
Administration and presents them in several national and international
seminars. Some seminars that he attended and gave a speech, among others, the
Launching NAPSIPAG Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2004), the 2th
NAPSIPAG Conference in Beijing, PR China (2005), the 3rd NAPSIPAG Conference
Sidney, Australia (2006), the IIAS/IISA International Congress, 2010, Nusa Dua,
Bali (2010), the 7th NAPSIPAG Conference in Kerala, India (2010), and the A4FPM
International Conference in Surabaya, Indonesia (2012).
Beside being published by several journals, Awang’s articles were also published by
Asian Development Bank (Manila, 2005), and Springer (New Delhi, 2013)