This document discusses physician aid in dying and definitions of related terms like death with dignity, physician assisted suicide, and euthanasia. It outlines where physician aid in dying is currently legal and the eligibility requirements. The document also presents some of the most common arguments against physician aid in dying, including concerns about the sanctity of life, distinguishing between passive and active actions, and potential for abuse. It then provides counter arguments for each of these common positions against physician aid in dying.
Euthanasia - facts and not covering the ethical aspectsVishnu Ambareesh
The document provides an overview of the history and definitions of euthanasia. It discusses:
- The origins and early definitions of euthanasia in ancient Greece and its first usage in a medical context in the 17th century.
- The different types of euthanasia including voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, and assisted suicide.
- How some countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, and some states in the U.S. have legalized certain forms of euthanasia while most countries prohibit non-voluntary euthanasia.
- Key events and debates around euthanasia in various countries over time including Nazi Germany, the U.S., Australia, Canada, and
This document discusses physician-assisted suicide and the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon. It provides definitions of physician-assisted suicide and outlines the steps required under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. These include being diagnosed with a terminal illness expected to lead to death within six months, making two oral and one written request, and undergoing medical examinations to confirm the diagnosis and patient's mental capacity. It also notes debates around the issue, with some arguing it could lead to abuse while others see it as providing dignity at end of life.
This document discusses physician-assisted suicide and examines whether Nevada should legalize it. It provides background on assisted suicide and how it differs from euthanasia. Currently, physician-assisted suicide is legal in Oregon, Washington, and Montana. The document outlines arguments for and against legalization, including that it could give terminally ill patients control over their suffering but may also lead to non-voluntary euthanasia. It also provides statistics on those who request and receive physician-assisted suicide in Oregon.
This document discusses the topic of euthanasia from a social work perspective. It defines euthanasia as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease. While legal in a few U.S. states, euthanasia is illegal in most countries. The document outlines different types of euthanasia, arguments for and against, effects on patients and families, the perspectives of social workers versus medical personnel, and references studies on dignity at end of life.
Euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide, involves intentionally ending a person's life to relieve persistent and unbearable suffering. It can be voluntary, involuntary, active, or passive. While illegal in most countries, several have legalized voluntary euthanasia for terminally ill patients. Palliative care aims to relieve suffering at the end of life through pain management without intentionally ending life. Debates around euthanasia involve arguments around patient autonomy, dignity, and relieving suffering versus the doctor's role, risks of coercion, and the potential for abuse.
Advanced directives are legal documents that specify a person's medical wishes in case they become unable to make decisions themselves. There are several types, including living wills, durable power of attorney, and health care proxies. A living will outlines preferences for life-sustaining treatments. A durable power of attorney designates someone to make medical and financial decisions. Health care proxies appoint a surrogate decision maker. The Patient Self-Determination Act protects patient rights regarding advance directives and medical decision making. However, ethical issues can arise regarding competency determinations and disagreements between patients, families and medical staff over treatment plans.
Euthanasia refers to the intentional killing of a dependent person for their benefit and can occur through action or omission. There are differing religious and social perspectives on euthanasia. Religions like Christianity and Catholicism are mostly against it, while some support a patient's right to die. Allowing euthanasia could help end suffering but may also have economic and slippery slope concerns if not strictly regulated. Overall the document discusses the various definitions, perspectives and controversies surrounding the issue of euthanasia.
EUTHANASIA AND SUICIDE DYSTHANASIA ORTHOTHANASIA
ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS TO THE DYING
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES END OF LIFE CARE PLAN OR DNR
NURSING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILTIES
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS
Euthanasia - facts and not covering the ethical aspectsVishnu Ambareesh
The document provides an overview of the history and definitions of euthanasia. It discusses:
- The origins and early definitions of euthanasia in ancient Greece and its first usage in a medical context in the 17th century.
- The different types of euthanasia including voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, and assisted suicide.
- How some countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, and some states in the U.S. have legalized certain forms of euthanasia while most countries prohibit non-voluntary euthanasia.
- Key events and debates around euthanasia in various countries over time including Nazi Germany, the U.S., Australia, Canada, and
This document discusses physician-assisted suicide and the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon. It provides definitions of physician-assisted suicide and outlines the steps required under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. These include being diagnosed with a terminal illness expected to lead to death within six months, making two oral and one written request, and undergoing medical examinations to confirm the diagnosis and patient's mental capacity. It also notes debates around the issue, with some arguing it could lead to abuse while others see it as providing dignity at end of life.
This document discusses physician-assisted suicide and examines whether Nevada should legalize it. It provides background on assisted suicide and how it differs from euthanasia. Currently, physician-assisted suicide is legal in Oregon, Washington, and Montana. The document outlines arguments for and against legalization, including that it could give terminally ill patients control over their suffering but may also lead to non-voluntary euthanasia. It also provides statistics on those who request and receive physician-assisted suicide in Oregon.
This document discusses the topic of euthanasia from a social work perspective. It defines euthanasia as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease. While legal in a few U.S. states, euthanasia is illegal in most countries. The document outlines different types of euthanasia, arguments for and against, effects on patients and families, the perspectives of social workers versus medical personnel, and references studies on dignity at end of life.
Euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide, involves intentionally ending a person's life to relieve persistent and unbearable suffering. It can be voluntary, involuntary, active, or passive. While illegal in most countries, several have legalized voluntary euthanasia for terminally ill patients. Palliative care aims to relieve suffering at the end of life through pain management without intentionally ending life. Debates around euthanasia involve arguments around patient autonomy, dignity, and relieving suffering versus the doctor's role, risks of coercion, and the potential for abuse.
Advanced directives are legal documents that specify a person's medical wishes in case they become unable to make decisions themselves. There are several types, including living wills, durable power of attorney, and health care proxies. A living will outlines preferences for life-sustaining treatments. A durable power of attorney designates someone to make medical and financial decisions. Health care proxies appoint a surrogate decision maker. The Patient Self-Determination Act protects patient rights regarding advance directives and medical decision making. However, ethical issues can arise regarding competency determinations and disagreements between patients, families and medical staff over treatment plans.
Euthanasia refers to the intentional killing of a dependent person for their benefit and can occur through action or omission. There are differing religious and social perspectives on euthanasia. Religions like Christianity and Catholicism are mostly against it, while some support a patient's right to die. Allowing euthanasia could help end suffering but may also have economic and slippery slope concerns if not strictly regulated. Overall the document discusses the various definitions, perspectives and controversies surrounding the issue of euthanasia.
EUTHANASIA AND SUICIDE DYSTHANASIA ORTHOTHANASIA
ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS TO THE DYING
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES END OF LIFE CARE PLAN OR DNR
NURSING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILTIES
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS
Euthanasia refers to the act of intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It is classified as either active or passive, and voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. While legal in some places like the Netherlands and some US states, it remains controversial. Religions generally oppose euthanasia as against the sanctity of life. Proponents argue it relieves pain, while opponents fear a slippery slope and devaluing of human life. Public opinion varies with some supporting legalization with safeguards while others fear abuse or pressure on the terminally ill.
Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. There are different types of Euthanasia voluntary or involuntary.
This document discusses assisted suicide and its legality. It defines the different types of assisted suicide such as euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is illegal in the US and Canada but legal in some other countries. Physician-assisted suicide is legal in a few US states under certain conditions, such as having a terminal illness. The document outlines Oregon's Death with Dignity Act and the safeguards it includes. It also discusses the controversies around assisted suicide and its potential impacts on both patients and healthcare workers.
The document discusses end-of-life care and palliative care. It defines acute care as short-term medical treatment, usually in a hospital, while palliative care aims to relieve suffering for those without curative treatments. The document also outlines a dying person's bill of rights, including their right to die with dignity and participate in decisions. It discusses principles of palliative care, including addressing physical, psychological and spiritual needs, and providing comfort to the terminally ill through symptom control and a peaceful environment.
This document provides information about advanced directives. It defines an advanced directive as a legal document that specifies a person's wishes for medical treatment if they become unable to make decisions. It discusses the importance of advanced directives for patients, families, and physicians. It also describes different types of advanced directives like living wills, medical powers of attorney, and do not resuscitate orders.
Ethics at the End of Life and Introduction to Hospice and Palliative Care for Medical Students. Exploration of feeding tubes, code status, when to stop chemo. Discusses cases and the ethical principles and values that are the basis for disagreement in care and what to do when there is a conflict in ethical principles themselves. Also provides an introduction to decisions of last resort including physician aid in dying, palliative sedation and voluntary refusal of nutrition and hydration.
The document discusses ethics of end-of-life care. It begins by defining end-of-life care and palliative care. It then outlines the four guiding ethical principles of clinical integrity, beneficence, autonomy, and justice/non-maleficence. The document discusses some key ethical dilemmas at the end of life including advance directives, surrogate decision makers, and refusal of treatment. It also discusses controversial issues like euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Randy M. Rosenberg is a clinical assistant professor of neurology at Temple University School of Medicine. The document discusses several topics related to bioethics including:
- Moral principles and ethics are not the same as feelings, religion, laws, or cultural norms. Ethics considers what is good/bad and right/wrong based on a value system.
- Key principles of physicians include saving life, keeping patients comfortable, respecting patient choices, treating all patients equally, providing competent care, and maintaining skills/knowledge.
- Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice are central elements of bioethics.
- Determining death can involve obligations, ideals
The document discusses euthanasia and provides information on its history, types, laws, and religious views.
[1] Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering, and can be active, passive, voluntary, or involuntary. It was first discussed in ancient Greece but largely rejected throughout history.
[2] Currently, only the Netherlands and Belgium legally permit euthanasia under certain conditions like voluntary requests and consultation. Assisted suicide is legal in some places with restrictions.
[3] Most major religions disapprove of euthanasia due to beliefs that God gives and takes life, though some accept passive forms or withholding treatment. Views vary between faith
This document discusses euthanasia and its legal status in India. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering, and describes three forms: passive euthanasia which allows natural death; active euthanasia which uses lethal injection; and assisted suicide with another's help. Passive euthanasia is legal in India but active euthanasia remains illegal. The document outlines the 2011 Aruna Shanbaug case that addressed euthanasia and established guidelines for approval. While euthanasia could relieve suffering, it also risks devaluing life and being misused if not strictly regulated. The legal status of active euthanasia in India is still being
Euthanasia and physician assisted suicideeliweber1980
This document discusses different types of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It defines active euthanasia as intentionally ending a patient's life, while passive euthanasia involves withholding treatment to allow natural death. Voluntary euthanasia requires patient consent, while involuntary euthanasia does not. Arguments for allowing euthanasia center around patient autonomy and relieving suffering, though critics argue this could lead to a slippery slope and that killing is morally worse than letting die. The document examines philosophical debates on these issues but draws no firm conclusions.
How useful are advance directives in directing end of life care and do people really understand or want to know the true status of their health as the end nears?
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It has been debated for centuries, with perspectives varying among medical ethics, religions, and cultures. While some jurisdictions have legalized certain forms with strict rules, euthanasia remains illegal in most places due to views that human life should not be directly terminated. The document traces discussions and practices of euthanasia over time, including its origins in ancient Greece, debates in various eras, modern laws, types (active vs. passive, voluntary vs. involuntary), religious views, and the paradox it poses for medical ethics codes.
This document discusses the moral issue of euthanasia. It defines euthanasia as an easy and painless death and classifies it as either self-administered or other-administered, and as either active/positive, passive/negative, voluntary or nonvoluntary. It outlines different views on whether euthanasia is right or wrong from philosophers like Garry Williams, James Rachel, Fillipa Foot, and Rachel Brandt. It also discusses perspectives from natural law ethics, Kant's ethics, and utilitarianism on when euthanasia may or may not be acceptable.
For our English presentation this semester, we (2nd year medical students) decided to do a research on euthanasia and its acceptance in different parts of the world.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It has ancient roots but was condemned for over 2000 years. In the early 20th century, some argued for "mercy killing" those deemed worthless. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary depending on patient consent. It is legally permitted in a few U.S. states and countries but generally banned due to ethical and practical concerns about the sanctity of life and potential for abuse. Proponents argue it respects patient autonomy while opponents fear it could devalue human life.
The document discusses attitudes towards death and dying, interventions for coping with terminal illness, and signs and symptoms of approaching death. It also covers the nurse's role in caring for dying patients and their families. Key points include the 5 stages of grief/acceptance according to Elizabeth Kübler-Ross (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance), interventions at each stage, common physical signs in the last days before death, and the importance of communication and supporting families.
The document discusses the concept of informed consent as it relates to nursing. It states that informed consent involves a patient's right to accept or reject treatment, and is a fundamental principle in healthcare. The role of nurses is to ensure physicians have explained treatments to patients in a way they understand, warned of risks, and documented that informed consent was obtained. It also notes special considerations for emancipated minors and those requiring a legal guardian's consent.
The document discusses several end-of-life concepts including dignity, death with dignity laws, prolongation of life, the inviolability of human life, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and dysthanasia. Death with dignity laws allow terminally ill individuals to request medication to hasten death, while prolongation of life refers to treatments and interventions that extend life. The inviolability of human life implies life should not be unlawfully ended and should be treated with respect. Euthanasia is the act of ending a life to relieve suffering, and can be active or passive. Assisted suicide provides means for an individual to end their own life. Dysthanasia describes prolonging the dying process against a patient
Research Paper DraftMy NameArgosy UniversityThesisPhys.docxdebishakespeare
Research Paper Draft
My Name
Argosy University
Thesis
Physician Assisted suicide or euthanasia, is also recognized as mercy killing. Euthanasia is the act of set to death without pain or allowing a person to die, as by perpetuation severe medical measures, a person or animal distress from an, in particular an incurable painful, disease or condition. The debate here is should physician-assisted suicide be legal [Beauchamp, Tom L
]
Argument
Physician Assisted suicide is the maneuver of killing or taking some one’s life. A lot of doctors and people feel that in distinct conditions it is the finest thing to do in order to keep a person from hurt and suffering. Who is to weep that
it is the supreme thing to do a family close friend, , the doctors, or the person that is unwell? If the human being that is in poor health is in a coma who is to make the decision? Who will state that the judgment is right and was the accurate object to do. Euthanasia or Physician assisted suicide is taking life into your individual hands, and in feat God
. The reality that physician assisted suicide or euthanasia is the assassination of a person brings about the issue should it be legal or illegal? [ McDougall, Jennifer]
Physician Assisted suicide is actually a predicament that various people today in America have confronted within their life span. Is it proper or perhaps do you find it improper? It really is a topic left up to that individual. You will come across not one other than two characteristics to just in relation to each scenario and obviously you will discover pair facets to this exacting one.
The meaning on the topic of suicide positions out as “the action concerning get rid of you deliberately with the support a physician. For someone to simply make use of this explanation then one possibly will possibly speak out the fact that it’s improper to do so.
Succeeding to substitute state that it ended up being additional beneficial to stop someone’s stress then one may possibly propose the reality that it’s adequate.
This issue is extremely dubious and has two very consistently influenced sides to argue. There are so numerous diverse arguments probable on each side of the case for example its morally wrong to do this, or it’s the people right to prefer to die etc. The reality that the preponderance of people considering this are fatally ill people. These populace only have a dreadful future ahead of them; mustn’t they
be permitted to decide the approach of their own end, and die with self-esteem? It can also be disputed that it is our ethical duty to stop someone from committing suicide, so in the identical way you be supposed to aid a person with a fatal illness let help them die.
When public listen to the words physician assisted suicide or euthanasia they be inclined to have a rapid reaction. Society be supposed to really think in relation to what euthanasia is and how accommodating it possibly will be. If people were to set themselves in patient ...
Euthanasia refers to the act of intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It is classified as either active or passive, and voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. While legal in some places like the Netherlands and some US states, it remains controversial. Religions generally oppose euthanasia as against the sanctity of life. Proponents argue it relieves pain, while opponents fear a slippery slope and devaluing of human life. Public opinion varies with some supporting legalization with safeguards while others fear abuse or pressure on the terminally ill.
Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. There are different types of Euthanasia voluntary or involuntary.
This document discusses assisted suicide and its legality. It defines the different types of assisted suicide such as euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is illegal in the US and Canada but legal in some other countries. Physician-assisted suicide is legal in a few US states under certain conditions, such as having a terminal illness. The document outlines Oregon's Death with Dignity Act and the safeguards it includes. It also discusses the controversies around assisted suicide and its potential impacts on both patients and healthcare workers.
The document discusses end-of-life care and palliative care. It defines acute care as short-term medical treatment, usually in a hospital, while palliative care aims to relieve suffering for those without curative treatments. The document also outlines a dying person's bill of rights, including their right to die with dignity and participate in decisions. It discusses principles of palliative care, including addressing physical, psychological and spiritual needs, and providing comfort to the terminally ill through symptom control and a peaceful environment.
This document provides information about advanced directives. It defines an advanced directive as a legal document that specifies a person's wishes for medical treatment if they become unable to make decisions. It discusses the importance of advanced directives for patients, families, and physicians. It also describes different types of advanced directives like living wills, medical powers of attorney, and do not resuscitate orders.
Ethics at the End of Life and Introduction to Hospice and Palliative Care for Medical Students. Exploration of feeding tubes, code status, when to stop chemo. Discusses cases and the ethical principles and values that are the basis for disagreement in care and what to do when there is a conflict in ethical principles themselves. Also provides an introduction to decisions of last resort including physician aid in dying, palliative sedation and voluntary refusal of nutrition and hydration.
The document discusses ethics of end-of-life care. It begins by defining end-of-life care and palliative care. It then outlines the four guiding ethical principles of clinical integrity, beneficence, autonomy, and justice/non-maleficence. The document discusses some key ethical dilemmas at the end of life including advance directives, surrogate decision makers, and refusal of treatment. It also discusses controversial issues like euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Randy M. Rosenberg is a clinical assistant professor of neurology at Temple University School of Medicine. The document discusses several topics related to bioethics including:
- Moral principles and ethics are not the same as feelings, religion, laws, or cultural norms. Ethics considers what is good/bad and right/wrong based on a value system.
- Key principles of physicians include saving life, keeping patients comfortable, respecting patient choices, treating all patients equally, providing competent care, and maintaining skills/knowledge.
- Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice are central elements of bioethics.
- Determining death can involve obligations, ideals
The document discusses euthanasia and provides information on its history, types, laws, and religious views.
[1] Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering, and can be active, passive, voluntary, or involuntary. It was first discussed in ancient Greece but largely rejected throughout history.
[2] Currently, only the Netherlands and Belgium legally permit euthanasia under certain conditions like voluntary requests and consultation. Assisted suicide is legal in some places with restrictions.
[3] Most major religions disapprove of euthanasia due to beliefs that God gives and takes life, though some accept passive forms or withholding treatment. Views vary between faith
This document discusses euthanasia and its legal status in India. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering, and describes three forms: passive euthanasia which allows natural death; active euthanasia which uses lethal injection; and assisted suicide with another's help. Passive euthanasia is legal in India but active euthanasia remains illegal. The document outlines the 2011 Aruna Shanbaug case that addressed euthanasia and established guidelines for approval. While euthanasia could relieve suffering, it also risks devaluing life and being misused if not strictly regulated. The legal status of active euthanasia in India is still being
Euthanasia and physician assisted suicideeliweber1980
This document discusses different types of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It defines active euthanasia as intentionally ending a patient's life, while passive euthanasia involves withholding treatment to allow natural death. Voluntary euthanasia requires patient consent, while involuntary euthanasia does not. Arguments for allowing euthanasia center around patient autonomy and relieving suffering, though critics argue this could lead to a slippery slope and that killing is morally worse than letting die. The document examines philosophical debates on these issues but draws no firm conclusions.
How useful are advance directives in directing end of life care and do people really understand or want to know the true status of their health as the end nears?
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It has been debated for centuries, with perspectives varying among medical ethics, religions, and cultures. While some jurisdictions have legalized certain forms with strict rules, euthanasia remains illegal in most places due to views that human life should not be directly terminated. The document traces discussions and practices of euthanasia over time, including its origins in ancient Greece, debates in various eras, modern laws, types (active vs. passive, voluntary vs. involuntary), religious views, and the paradox it poses for medical ethics codes.
This document discusses the moral issue of euthanasia. It defines euthanasia as an easy and painless death and classifies it as either self-administered or other-administered, and as either active/positive, passive/negative, voluntary or nonvoluntary. It outlines different views on whether euthanasia is right or wrong from philosophers like Garry Williams, James Rachel, Fillipa Foot, and Rachel Brandt. It also discusses perspectives from natural law ethics, Kant's ethics, and utilitarianism on when euthanasia may or may not be acceptable.
For our English presentation this semester, we (2nd year medical students) decided to do a research on euthanasia and its acceptance in different parts of the world.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It has ancient roots but was condemned for over 2000 years. In the early 20th century, some argued for "mercy killing" those deemed worthless. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary depending on patient consent. It is legally permitted in a few U.S. states and countries but generally banned due to ethical and practical concerns about the sanctity of life and potential for abuse. Proponents argue it respects patient autonomy while opponents fear it could devalue human life.
The document discusses attitudes towards death and dying, interventions for coping with terminal illness, and signs and symptoms of approaching death. It also covers the nurse's role in caring for dying patients and their families. Key points include the 5 stages of grief/acceptance according to Elizabeth Kübler-Ross (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance), interventions at each stage, common physical signs in the last days before death, and the importance of communication and supporting families.
The document discusses the concept of informed consent as it relates to nursing. It states that informed consent involves a patient's right to accept or reject treatment, and is a fundamental principle in healthcare. The role of nurses is to ensure physicians have explained treatments to patients in a way they understand, warned of risks, and documented that informed consent was obtained. It also notes special considerations for emancipated minors and those requiring a legal guardian's consent.
The document discusses several end-of-life concepts including dignity, death with dignity laws, prolongation of life, the inviolability of human life, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and dysthanasia. Death with dignity laws allow terminally ill individuals to request medication to hasten death, while prolongation of life refers to treatments and interventions that extend life. The inviolability of human life implies life should not be unlawfully ended and should be treated with respect. Euthanasia is the act of ending a life to relieve suffering, and can be active or passive. Assisted suicide provides means for an individual to end their own life. Dysthanasia describes prolonging the dying process against a patient
Research Paper DraftMy NameArgosy UniversityThesisPhys.docxdebishakespeare
Research Paper Draft
My Name
Argosy University
Thesis
Physician Assisted suicide or euthanasia, is also recognized as mercy killing. Euthanasia is the act of set to death without pain or allowing a person to die, as by perpetuation severe medical measures, a person or animal distress from an, in particular an incurable painful, disease or condition. The debate here is should physician-assisted suicide be legal [Beauchamp, Tom L
]
Argument
Physician Assisted suicide is the maneuver of killing or taking some one’s life. A lot of doctors and people feel that in distinct conditions it is the finest thing to do in order to keep a person from hurt and suffering. Who is to weep that
it is the supreme thing to do a family close friend, , the doctors, or the person that is unwell? If the human being that is in poor health is in a coma who is to make the decision? Who will state that the judgment is right and was the accurate object to do. Euthanasia or Physician assisted suicide is taking life into your individual hands, and in feat God
. The reality that physician assisted suicide or euthanasia is the assassination of a person brings about the issue should it be legal or illegal? [ McDougall, Jennifer]
Physician Assisted suicide is actually a predicament that various people today in America have confronted within their life span. Is it proper or perhaps do you find it improper? It really is a topic left up to that individual. You will come across not one other than two characteristics to just in relation to each scenario and obviously you will discover pair facets to this exacting one.
The meaning on the topic of suicide positions out as “the action concerning get rid of you deliberately with the support a physician. For someone to simply make use of this explanation then one possibly will possibly speak out the fact that it’s improper to do so.
Succeeding to substitute state that it ended up being additional beneficial to stop someone’s stress then one may possibly propose the reality that it’s adequate.
This issue is extremely dubious and has two very consistently influenced sides to argue. There are so numerous diverse arguments probable on each side of the case for example its morally wrong to do this, or it’s the people right to prefer to die etc. The reality that the preponderance of people considering this are fatally ill people. These populace only have a dreadful future ahead of them; mustn’t they
be permitted to decide the approach of their own end, and die with self-esteem? It can also be disputed that it is our ethical duty to stop someone from committing suicide, so in the identical way you be supposed to aid a person with a fatal illness let help them die.
When public listen to the words physician assisted suicide or euthanasia they be inclined to have a rapid reaction. Society be supposed to really think in relation to what euthanasia is and how accommodating it possibly will be. If people were to set themselves in patient ...
This document discusses patient autonomy and physician obligations at end of life. It examines two case studies of young women with terminal illnesses who are maintaining autonomy in different ways. Brittany Maynard is moving to Oregon to pursue physician assisted suicide, while Lauren Hill focuses on raising cancer awareness and playing basketball. The document argues that physicians should support patient choices to die with dignity as long as they are competent. It also stresses the importance of advance care planning and conversations with loved ones to ensure wishes are followed.
Physician-assisted suicide is a controversial issue that is only legal in five U.S. states. It allows terminally ill patients with less than six months to live to request lethal medication from their doctor to end their own lives. While some see it as giving patients control at the end of life, others argue it could encourage suicide or that terminally ill patients are not in a mental state to make such a decision. There are also concerns about how to protect vulnerable patients from being coerced into suicide. The document discusses the various perspectives on this complex issue and argues rules need to be put in place to allow physician-assisted suicide as an option while also protecting doctors' and patients' rights.
The document argues against physician aided suicide (PAS) or euthanasia for several reasons. It states that modern medicine can effectively manage pain and end of life care without hastening death. It also argues that PAS could become overused for health care cost containment and that some may choose it due to depression rather than medical necessity. Finally, it maintains that allowing PAS could start society down a slippery slope where laws are abused or people feel pressured to end their lives prematurely.
The document argues against physician aided suicide (PAS) or euthanasia for several reasons. It states that modern medicine can effectively manage pain and end of life care without hastening death. It also argues that PAS could become overused for health care cost containment and that some may choose it due to depression rather than medical necessity. Finally, it maintains that allowing PAS could start society down a slippery slope where human life is devalued.
This document discusses the debate around euthanasia and whether it should be permitted. It presents arguments on both sides of the issue. Those in favor believe a patient has the right to end their life when their quality of life has deteriorated to an unacceptable level due to an incurable illness. However, opponents argue that euthanasia amounts to taking a human life, which is immoral. The document also examines factors that motivate a terminally ill patient's desire for euthanasia and distinguishes euthanasia from murder when done with a patient's consent.
This document discusses assisted suicide and its legality. It defines the different types of assisted suicide such as euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia is illegal in the US and Canada but legal in some other countries, while physician-assisted suicide is legal in a few US states and some other countries. The document outlines Oregon's Death with Dignity Act and safeguards required for physician-assisted suicide. It also discusses arguments for and against assisted suicide and how it impacts both terminally ill patients and healthcare workers.
This document discusses euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. Active euthanasia involves direct action like lethal injection, while passive euthanasia is withdrawing life support. Voluntary euthanasia requires consent, while non-voluntary applies to those unable to consent like comatose patients. Laws vary globally, with the Netherlands and some Australian states legalizing voluntary euthanasia under strict guidelines. The document also discusses suicide and concludes that right to die is still developing legally, and is currently prohibited in Nepal.
This document discusses the ethical issues surrounding physician-assisted suicide. It begins by providing background on laws legalizing physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, Washington, and Montana. It then outlines the two main arguments for and against physician-assisted suicide - that terminally ill patients should have the right to end their suffering, but others argue they may not be thinking rationally due to depression or medication. The document raises concerns that legalizing physician-assisted suicide could open the door for people with other conditions to end their lives and that determining mental competence is difficult. It concludes that while death is a natural part of life, physician-assisted suicide could allow people to seize control over the timing of death in a way that prevents suicide in non-
Euthanasiafrom Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied HealthD.docxhumphrieskalyn
Euthanasia
from Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health
Definition
Euthanasia is the act of putting a person (or animal) to death painlessly, or allowing a person (or animal) to die by withholding medical treatment in cases of incurable disease. The word “euthanasia” comes from two Greek words that mean “good death.” Euthanasia is sometimes called “mercy killing.”
Description
Terms and categories
It is important to distinguish euthanasia from “assisted suicide,” which is sometimes used loosely as a synonym for euthanasia. Assisted suicide, which is often called “self-deliverance” in Britain, refers to a person's bringing about his or her own death with the help of another person. When the other person is a physician, the act is called “doctor-assisted suicide.” As of 2017, assisted suicide was permitted by law in California, Colorado, Washington, D.C., Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. Oregon legalized assisted suicide in 1994. The other states that permitted assisted suicide had passed laws between 2008 and 2016. Laws prohibited the practice in 37 states, three states prohibited it by common law, and four states did not specify.
Euthanasia strictly speaking means that a physician or other person is the one who performs the last act that causes death; in other words, the physician or other person kills the patient. For example, if a physician injects a patient with a lethal overdose of a pain-killing medication, he or she is performing euthanasia. If the physician leaves the patient with a loaded syringe and the patient injects himself or herself with it, the act is an assisted suicide. Euthanasia of animals is a common practice in veterinary medicine. Euthanasia of humans is illegal throughout the United States, prohibited as a type of homicide.
Euthanasia is usually categorized as either active or passive, and as either voluntary or involuntary. The first set of categories refers to the means of ending life, and the second set of categories refers to the agent of the decision. Active euthanasia involves putting a patient to death for merciful reasons. Passive euthanasia involves withholding medical care, or not doing something to prevent death. In voluntary euthanasia, the patient is the one who wishes to die and has usually requested either active or passive euthanasia. In involuntary euthanasia, someone else makes the decision to terminate the patient's life, usually because the patient is in a coma or otherwise unable to make an informed request to die.
Another important term to understand is the socalled doctrine of double effect. This is a legal term that has been underscored by the United States Supreme Court in one of its decisions. The doctrine of double effect states that a medical treatment intended to relieve pain that incidentally hastens the patient's death is still appropriate and legally acceptable. In other words, a doctor who gives a dying patient high doses of morphine to prevent pain, knowing that such high.
This document summarizes key concepts around end-of-life care including euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, advance directives, and the right to refuse treatment. It outlines legal cases that have established patients' rights to self-determination and defines key terms like living wills, health care proxies, and the difference between withdrawing and withholding treatment. The objectives are to discuss the human struggle to survive, end-of-life issues, and legislation around defining death and a patient's right to refuse prolonging life artificially.
This document discusses euthanasia and its legal status in various countries and US states. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a person's life to alleviate pain and suffering, and identifies three types: voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary. Several landmark court cases related to end-of-life decisions and removing life support are also summarized. Both arguments for and against euthanasia are presented, focusing on patient autonomy versus the ethical responsibilities of medical professionals.
This document discusses euthanasia and its classification, components, legal status in India, and consequences. It defines euthanasia as the intentional ending of a patient's life by a doctor at the request of the patient or family member. Euthanasia can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. It also distinguishes between active euthanasia, which uses lethal substances, and passive euthanasia, which withholds treatment. While passive euthanasia is legal in India, active euthanasia remains illegal. The document also notes debates around autonomy, medical ethics, abuse potential, and slippery slope concerns with legalizing euthanasia.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering from an incurable disease or condition. It can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary depending on patient consent. Arguments for euthanasia include autonomy, compassion, and controlling suffering, while arguments against include the slippery slope towards non-voluntary euthanasia and that there are alternatives to relieve suffering without intentionally ending a life. Religiously and legally, active euthanasia is generally prohibited but passive euthanasia may be permitted in some circumstances with appropriate safeguards.
Similar to Dying with Dignity PP for reals.pptx (15)
2. Definitions
• Death with dignity: “(1) an end-of-life option that allows certain eligible individuals to legally request and
obtain medications from their physician to end their life in a peaceful, humane, and dignified manner; (2)
state legislation codifying such an end-of-life option; (3) a family of organizations promoting the end-of-life
option around the United States” (FAQs…).
• Physician Assisted Death: a term often used interchangeably with physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which
involves a doctor "knowingly and intentionally providing a person with the knowledge or means or both
required to commit suicide, including counseling about lethal doses of drugs, prescribing such lethal doses
or supplying the drugs” (CMA Policy…).
• Euthanasia: “ knowingly and intentionally performing an act that is explicitly intended to end another
person's life and that includes the following elements: the subject has an incurable illness; the agent knows
about the person's condition; commits the act with the primary intention of ending the life of that person;
and the act is undertaken with empathy and compassion and without personal gain” (CMA Policy…).
• Three types of Euthanasia are identified; the divisions are premised on whether the subject has and
expresses a desire to end their life:
• Voluntary euthanasia is limited to situations where the subject is a competent, informed person who has
voluntarily asked for his or her life to be ended.
• Non-voluntary euthanasia means the person has not developed or expressed his or her preference
regarding aid in dying or is incapacitated and is unable to make or exercise an informed choice.
• In-voluntary euthanasia means the person made an informed choice and expressed his or her refusal
for aid in dying.
3. PAS/PAD vs Euthanasia
• involve the
use of lethal
medications
to
deliberately
end a
patient's life
•the patient must self-
administer the
medications; the "aid-in-
dying" refers to a
physician providing the
medications, but the
patient decides whether
and when to ingest the
lethal medication
•when a third
party
administers
medication or
acts directly to
end the patient’s
life
Physician Aid in Dying/
Physician Assisted Suicide Euthanasia
(Braddock III
& Tonelli
4. Other Practices that are not PAS
or PAD
• Some other practices that should be distinguished from physician aid-in-dying include:
▪ Withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: When a competent adult patient makes
an informed decision to refuse life-sustaining treatment, their wishes are generally respected. The
right of a competent adult patient to refuse life-sustaining treatments is supported by law.
▪ Pain medication that may hasten death: Often a terminally ill, suffering patient may require
dosages of pain medication that have side effects that may hasten death, such as impairing respiration.
Using the ethical principle of double effect as the foundational argument, it is generally held by most
professional societies, and supported in court decisions, that this action is justifiable. Since the
primary goal and intention of administering these medications is to relieve suffering, the secondary
outcome of potentially hastening death is recognized as an expected and acceptable side-effect in a
terminally ill patient.
▪ Palliative sedation: This term refers to the practice of sedating a terminally ill patient to the point
of unconsciousness, due to intractable pain and suffering that has been refractory to traditional
medical management. Such patients are imminently dying, usually hours or days from death. Often
other life-sustaining interventions continue to be withheld (CPR, respirator, antibiotics, artificial
nutrition and hydration, etc.) while the patient is sedated. Palliative sedation may occur for a short
period (respite from intractable pain) or the patient may be sedated until s/he dies. In the rare
instances when pain and suffering is refractory to treatment even with expert clinical management by
pain and palliative care professionals, palliative sedation may legally be employed.
5. Where is PAS/PAD legal?
By NickCT - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=39316187
Briefly legal
in 2014 but
overturned
in 2015
Legal as of: 1997
Legal as of:
November
2016
Legal as of: May
2013
Legal as of:
November
2008 Legal as of: 2009
Baxter v.
Montana
Legal as
of June
9, 2016
(As of March 2015)
Bill
passed
in
October
2015
Law passed in
November 1994
6. States where there is no specific
statute making assisted suicide
illegal
• Washington D.C.
• Nevada (The act may or may not be covered
by common law.)
• North Carolina (The act may or may not be
covered by common law.)
• Utah (Utah does not recognize common law
and has no specific statute for assisted
suicide.)
• West Virginia
• Wyoming (Wyoming does not recognize
common law and has no specific statute for
assisted suicide.) (ProCon.org
2015)
7. Who Qualifies for PAS/PAD?
•Must be a resident within one of the six states
•Must be 18 years or older
•Must have six months or less till expected
death due to a terminal illness
•Must have two oral (or least 15 days apart)
and one written request to a physician
•Must be capable of making and
communicating health care decisions for
him/herself and has made the request
voluntarily
(ProCon.org
2015)
8. Most Common Arguments
Against Physician Aid-in-
Dying:
1.Sanctity of life
2.Passive vs. Active distinction
3.Potential for abuse
4.Professional integrity
5.Fallibility of the profession
9. Argument #1: Sanctity of
Human Life
•Religious and secular traditions upholding the sanctity of
human life have historically prohibited suicide or
assistance in dying. PAD is morally wrong because it is
viewed as diminishing the sanctity of life. (Braddock III &
Tonelli 2013)
• We are made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–27) and
therefore human life has an inherently sacred attribute that
should be protected and respected at all times. While God
gave humanity the authority to kill and eat other forms of
life (Genesis 9:3), the murdering of other human beings is
expressly forbidden, with the penalty being death
(Genesis 9:6). (Old Testament vs New Testament)
10. Counter Argument to the “Sanctity
of Human Life”
• Not everyone has the same God or even believes in God(s), it is unfair to take away a choice
because some people disagree
• If the penalty for bloodshed is death - isn’t that just more bloodshed?
• With the definition of “bloodshed” meaning: “(1) destruction of life, as in war or murder;
slaughter; or (2) the shedding of blood by injury, wound, etc” (“bloodshed”).
• If you take the second definition: There is no blood involved in PAD, the patient merely takes
a few pills and falls asleep to die.
• If you take the first definition: According to the United States Law, murder is “the killing of
another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special
statutory definitions include: murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by
deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime,
as robbery or arson (first-degree murder) and murder by intent but without deliberation or
premeditation (second-degree murder)” (“murder”). Due to the fact that PAD is done without
malicious intent and is done not by the physician but at the will of the patient to end their life
merely with the aid of a physician, it should not be attributed to murder.
• Furthermore, some physicians aid their patients in dying without even knowing it, usually
prescriptions are given in monthly increments meaning you most likely will have 30 pills in
one fill of the medication, if one were to take all 30 pills, they would most likely die or
become extremely ill.
11. Argument #2: Passive vs.
Active Distinction
“There is an important difference between
passively "letting die" and actively "killing."
Treatment refusal or withholding treatment
equates to letting die (passive) and is
justifiable, whereas PAD equates to killing
(active) and is not justifiable” (Braddock III &
Tonelli 2013).
12. Counter Argument #2: Passive vs.
Active Distinction
• Both killing (active) and withholding treatment (passive) have the
same result: the patient dies, the difference being that the person
either dies quickly or slowly.
• Furthermore, since the physician only supplies the patient with the
script to ascertain the drugs, and does not administer them directly
or lay a hand on the patient, it could be considered passive (accepting
or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response
or resistance).
• Usually when one has a terminal illness, they are in extreme pain,
sometimes the drugs do not work any more or they’re incapacitated
or otherwise “not all there.”
• In the event of being in extreme pain and knowing you won’t
recover, would you rather have a quick and painless death or
prolong your suffering to get to the same end result?
13. Argument #3: Potential for
Abuse
“Vulnerable populations, lacking access to quality
care and support, may be pushed into assisted
death. Furthermore, assisted death may become a
cost-containment strategy. Burdened family
members and health care providers may encourage
loved ones to opt for assisted death and the
protections in legislation can never catch all
instances of such coercion or exploitation. To
protect against these abuses, PAD should remain
illegal.”
(Braddock III & Tonelli
2013)
14. Counter Argument #3: Potential
for Abuse
• With all the restrictions in place for being
allowed to participate in PAD, it is unlikely
that one would be able to go through all
avenues and requirements without arousing
suspicion, and since the patient must
communicate to the physician that he/she
wishes to end their life, the only way one
could possibly use this as a means to rid
themselves of debt would be to either
blackmail the patient into giving their
consent or use a psychological tactic to
convince the patient to give their consent (i.e.
hypnotherapy, conditioning, door-in-face
tactic, foot-in-door tactic, etc.).
15. Argument #4: Professional
Integrity
“Historical ethical traditions in medicine are strongly
opposed to taking life. For instance, the Hippocratic
oath states, "I will not administer poison to anyone
where asked," and I will "be of benefit, or at least
do no harm." Furthermore, some major professional
groups such as the American Medical Association
and the American Geriatrics Society oppose
assisted death. The overall concern is that linking
PAD to the practice of medicine could harm both
the integrity and the public's image of the
profession.”
(Braddock III & Tonelli 2013)
16. Counter Argument #4: Professional
Integrity
• In the hippocratic oath one of the things physicians promise is to
“remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that
warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife
or the chemist's drug” (“Definition of Hippocratic Oath” 2016); if
someone is in so much pain with no hope of survival or if they are aware
they are going to die soon, don’t we owe it to them to give them their
dying wish? Don’t we owe them sympathy and warmth, as physicians
have promised?
• “I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special
obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and
body as well as the infirm” (“Definition of Hippocratic Oath” 2016); we
owe it to the people we treat to remember that we are there to help them
and whether helping is preventing someone from dying or helping them
move on from this life so they can die with dignity surrounded by those
who love them and on their own terms.
17. Counter Argument #4: Professional
Integrity (continued)
• “I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to
me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of
life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within
my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great
humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God”
(“Definition of Hippocratic Oath” 2016). Obviously this statement in itself is
hypocritical, but it draws on the fact that physicians have the power to take a life
as well as save it, or saving someone’s life by taking it; saving them from months
of extreme agony, or not being able to move, eat, or breathe by themselves, being
left in a vegetative state for the last few months of their so-called “life,” making
their family watch them go through this pain and watch them slowly deteriorate
with no hope of a comeback, it’s almost sick.
• Furthermore, physicians are not required to take the hippocratic oath, it is optional
and even if they do indeed decide to take the oath - they are in NO way bound by
it.
18. Argument #5: Fallibility of
the Profession
“The concern here is that physicians will make
mistakes. For instance there may be uncertainty in
diagnosis and prognosis. There may be errors in
diagnosis and treatment of depression, or inadequate
treatment of pain. Thus the State has an obligation to
protect lives from these inevitable mistakes and to
improve the quality of pain and symptom
management at the end of life.”
(Braddock III & Tonelli
2013)
19. Counter Argument #5: Fallibility of
the Profession
• Mistakes are inevitable, however it is not the physician’s
fault if someone wishes to end their life, people will do
what they want to do, having PAD be legal benefits the
patient, the physician and the family. It gives physicians
more time to work on patients who still have the
possibility of getting better; it allows the patient to die
with dignity on their own terms and without being in
excruciating pain; and it allows the family to grieve and
remember their loved one as they were before instead
as they are in that moment of agony.
• I am uncertain as to why depression is mentioned since
it is not a terminal illness, therefore it would not be
allowed for the patient to participate in PAD
20. Brittany Maynard
Born in Anaheim, California, on November 19, 1984.
Graduated from the University of California, Berkeley with a bachelor's degree
in psychology in 2006 from the College of Letters and Science and the
University of California, Irvine School of Education in 2010 with a master's
degree in education.
Interested in international travel since high school (Maynard taught at
orphanages in Kathmandu, Nepal and traveled also to Vietnam, Cambodia, and
other Southeast Asian countries.)
Married Daniel Esteban "Dan" Diaz in September 2012 and they were trying
for a family.
(Girap 2015)
21. Brittany Maynard’s Debilitating
Diagnosis & Death
• On January 1, 2014, she was diagnosed with stage 2 astrocytoma and had a partial
craniotomy and a partial resection of her temporal lobe.
• The cancer returned in April 2014, and her diagnosis was then elevated to stage 4
astrocytoma with a prognosis of six months to live.
• Moved from California to Oregon to take advantage of Oregon's Death with
Dignity Law, saying she had decided that "death with dignity was the best option
for me and my family."
• Partnered with Compassion & Choices to create the Brittany Maynard Fund,
which seeks to legalize aid in dying in states where it is now illegal. She also
wrote an opinion piece for CNN titled "My Right to Death with Dignity at 29”.
• On October 29, 2014, she stated that "it doesn't seem like the right time right now"
but that she would still end her own life at some future point.
• Planned to end her life on November 1, 2014, with drugs prescribed by her doctor.
Maynard wrote in her final Facebook post:
"Goodbye to all my dear friends and family that I love. Today is the day I have
chosen to pass away with dignity in the face of my terminal illness, this terrible
brain cancer that has taken so much from me ... but would have taken so much
more."
26. References
bloodshed. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved November 20, 2016 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bloodshed
Braddock III, C. H., MD, MA, & Tonelli, M. R., MD, MA. (2013). Physician Aid-in-Dying: Ethical Topic in Medicine (H. Starks PhD, MPH, D. Dudzinski
PhD, MTS, & N. White MD, MA, Eds.). Retrieved November 19, 2016, from http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/pad.html
CMA POLICY: EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE (UPDATE 2007). (2007). Canadian Medical Association Publications, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada.
Definition of Hippocratic Oath - MedicineNet. (2016, May 13). Retrieved October 23, 2016, from
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=20909
FAQs - Death With Dignity. (n.d.). Retrieved November 19, 2016, from https://www.deathwithdignity.org/faqs/
Johnson, K. (2009, August 31). Montana Court to Rule on Assisted Suicide Case. Retrieved November 19, 2016, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/us/01montana.html
Girap, S. (Ed.). (2015). Brittany Maynard. Retrieved November 20, 2016, from http://alchetron.com/Brittany-Maynard-993059-W
Old Testament vs New Testament: Same God? (n.d.). Retrieved November 20, 2016, from http://www.bibleinfo.com/en/questions/god-old-testament-same-
god-new-testament-0
Maynard, B. (2014, November 2). Brittany Maynard: My right to death with dignity at 29. Retrieved October 19, 2016, from
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/07/opinion/maynard-assisted-suicide-cancer-dignity/index.html
murder. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved November 20, 2016 from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/murder
ProCon.org. (2015, October 5). State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide. Retrieved from
http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000132