The document discusses the case Muncy v. City of Dallas, which addresses substantive and procedural due process. It outlines the facts, contentions from both parties, legal issues related to First Amendment rights, the court's decision, and its reasoning. The key legal point reinforces the importance of due process in relation to individual rights.

1. Due Process – Substantive and Procedural:
Muncy v. City of Dallas
, 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2003)
Title and Citation
(e.g.
Jones v. Smith
, 123 F.3d 456 (11thCir. 2004))
Type of Action
(e.g. civil suit for money damages for violation of free speech
rights under the First Amendment.)
Facts of the Case
(Discuss relevant facts; what happened? Why is this matter in
court?)
Contentions of the Parties
(What are the best arguments favoring each party?)
Smith argues that:
Jones argues that:

2. Issue(s)
(The issue relevant to the subjects studied in the module in
which it is assigned, e.g. Were Jones’ rights under the First
Amendment violated when he was fired for speaking at a
political rally?)
Decision
(How did the court rule on that issue?)
Reasoning
(Why did the court rule the way it did? This is the
most important part
of the case.)
Rule of Law
(What one legal point do we take from this case?)
Length: Should not exceed 2 pages.