1) The document outlines an agenda for a lesson on the judicial branch, including an introduction to the judiciary, the first case, and a team quiz on the Constitution.
2) It provides background information on the Constitution's system of checks and balances between the three branches of government. Key powers of Congress, the President, and the courts are described.
3) The notes define important judiciary terms like trial, appellate case, counsel, judge, jury, plaintiff, defendant, and appellant. The structure of an oral argument is also outlined.
IST 309 Team-ProjectA. Write about laws of Drones. (Like Privacy.docxpriestmanmable
IST 309 Team-Project
A. Write about laws of Drones. (Like Privacy rights or public concerns)NO TITLE PAGE!
B. The main content of my paper is talking about Laws of public concerns, so don’t talking about military or famers or other things!
C. You must read these three articles and quote these articles, moreover use these articles as your references.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/few-privacy-limitations-exist-on-how-police-use-drones-20150205
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/mar/05/drones-california-police-sacramento-privacy/
http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2014/11/drones-and-aerial-surveillance
D. APA format, double space, NO INTRODUTION, NO HISTORY, because it is a team project and I need write a Laws Part on it. Other team member will do introduction and history part. SO, PLEASE just write LAWS of Drones!
E. This is the order of my paper.
1. A starting of Laws of Drones. The following is a example, you need to write like that, but you cannot copy it:
(As drones become cheaper and more capable, more police departments across the country are asking for and getting federal approval to use them for law enforcement.
But the Federal Aviation Administration only takes safety into consideration when it grants a law enforcement agency approval to use drones, leaving privacy protections to legislation—which, depending on the state in question, may or may not exist.)
2. Give a Real Example of Drones.
a) How Drones invasion of Privacy? Give a real example of it. Like Drone fly to someone’s backyard without search warrant.
b) Talk about a certain law about Drones of privacy protection.
c) How public feels about it? How public concerns about it?
3. Talk about two Police Departments have different views: Mesa County and other law enforcement agencies. You need to write down the following content on my paper.(You can get a lot information from first article).
a) Mesa County proactive role in drones and publics concerns
i. Largent Drone Program in the US
ii. 17 pages Policy Manual on Drones
b) Other Law Enforcement agencies played a more secretive role in deploying Drones.
4. Bills and Government Regulation. (You can get more information from second article).
a) Write Laws SB-142 and AB-56, and list the main points of Drones from these two laws.
b) Talk about Government Regulations.
5. The views of Gregory McNeal(You can get more information from third article)
a) Give an introduction of Gregory McNeal, like Gregory McNeal who is Professor of Pepperdine University and also is an Expert in Law and Public Policy.
b) Talk about Gregory McNeal’s Main Focus: security, technology and crime.
c) Write about Five Core Recommendations of Gregory McNeal.
d) Give more details or explain Fifth Point of McNeal. It’s following one.
(5. Legislators should recognize that technology such as geofencing and auto-redaction, may make aerial surveillance by drones more protective of privacy than human surveillance.)
State Court System
Chapte ...
Unit IV Scholarly Activity Constitution Comparison Worksheet.docxmarilucorr
Unit IV
Scholarly Activity: Constitution Comparison Worksheet
Page 1: Fill in the blanks below with the appropriate answers.
Page 2: Complete the essay in a minimum of 300 words in length.
.
Table 1 Instructions: Compare the Articles of Confederation and Constitution by filling out the blanks below.
Comparison
Articles of Confederation
Constitution
Ratification Year
(1.)
1788
Votes
1 vote per state
2 Senate votes + proportional House votes
Legislature
(2.)
Bicameral
Courts
State courts only
Separate Judicial Branch
President
Presided over Congress
(3.)
Trade
State controlled
Federally controlled
Passing Laws
Consensus of (4.) states
Congressional majority and presidential signature
Tax Laws
State controlled
Federally controlled
Control of military
Congress
Congress
Currency
State Issued
Federally Issued
Amendments
Required the consent of (5.) states
2/3 Congress and 3/4 of states
Table 2 Instructions: Fill out the missing words from the United States Bill of Rights.
Amendment 1
Right to freedoms of (6.) and speech; right to assemble and to (7.) the government for redress of grievances
Amendment 2
Right to keep and bear arms to maintain a well-regulated (8.)
Amendment 3
Right not to house (9.) during time of war
Amendment 4
Right to be secure from unreasonable (10.) and (11.)
Amendment 5
Rights in criminal cases, including to (12.) process and indictment by grand jury for capital crimes, as well as the right not to testify against oneself
Amendment 6
Right to a speedy (13.) by an impartial jury
Amendment 7
Right to a (14.) trial in civil cases
Amendment 8
Right not to face excessive (15.) or fines, or (16.) and (17.) punishment
Amendment 9
Rights retained by the (18.) , even if they are not specifically (19.) by the Constitution
Amendment 10
(20.) States’ to powers not specifically delegated to the federal government
Below, compare and contrast the philosophies of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists that emerged during the time period of the Constitutional Convention through the ratification of the U.S. Constitution (roughly the late 1780s). In your answer, make sure to also include how the philosophies of both parties were reflective of the American society of the time.
Your response must be at least 300 words in length.
2
...
#1 Americans know what SMJ is before going to court as it is everything SueBozgoz
#1 Americans know what Subject Matter Jurisdiction is before going to court as it is everything. The issue today is we AMERICANS are being played by the entire justice system to include the Jail & Prison System. To make matters worse, the Prisons are experimenting on Americans illegally. Follow our real time RICO case against the DEEP STATE see: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WTXWnbl8YhXG/
Awad v. ZiriaxUnless otherwise stated, you should answer in co.docxcelenarouzie
Awad v. Ziriax
Unless otherwise stated, you should answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use
correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format.
Your response should be a minimum of four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the
Length and Formatting instructions below for additional details.
In complete sentences respond to the following prompts:
Summarize the facts of the case;
Identify the parties and explain each party’s position;
Outline the case’s procedural history including any appeals;
What is the legal issue in question in this case?
How did the court rule on the legal issue of this case?
What facts did the court find to be most important in making its decision?
Respond to the following questions:
o Can a U.S. court enforce a clause in a contract specifying that Sharia law
will apply?
o When, if ever, should a national court look to decisions of courts in other
nations when interpreting its own nation’s constitution?
o
Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? If you disagree, provide an
explanation of your reasoning.
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT MUNEER AWAD, Plaintiff - Appellee, v.
PAUL ZIRIAX, Agency Head, Oklahoma State Board of Elections, THOMAS PRINCE, Chairman of the
Board, Oklahoma State Board of Elections, STEVE CURRY, Board Member, Oklahoma State Board of
Elections, and JIM ROTH, Board Member, Oklahoma State Board of Elections, Defendants - Appellants. --
-------------------------- FOUNDATION OF MORAL LAW; THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW
YORK; THE ISLAMIC LAW COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN BRANCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW
ASSOCIATION, THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE, AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH
AND STATE, THE ANTIDEFAMATION LEAGUE, THE BAPTIST JOINT COMMITTEE FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY,
THE CENTER FOR ISLAMIC PLURALISM, INTERFAITH ALLIANCE, AND THE No. 10-6273 FILED United States
Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 10, 2012 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court -2- UNION FOR
REFORM JUDAISM, Amici Curiae. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (D.C. NO. 5:10-CV-01186-M) Patrick R. Wyrick, Solicitor General
(Scott D. Boughton and Janis Wood Preslar, Assistant Attorneys General, on the briefs), Office of the
Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, appearing for Appellant. Micheal Salem,
Salem Law Offices, Norman, Oklahoma (Joseph Thai, Norman, Oklahoma; Gadeir Abbas, Council of
American Islamic Relations, Washington, DC; and Daniel Mach and Heather L. Weaver, American Civil
Liberties Union Foundation, Washington, DC, with him on the briefs), appearing for Appellee. Roy S.
Moore, Benjamin D. DuPre, and John Allen Eidsmoe, Montgomery, Alabama, filed an Amicus Curiae brief
on behalf of the Foundation of Moral Law. Robert E. Michael, Robert E. Michael & Associates, PLLC, New
York, New York, filed an Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of Associ.
1. DRAW A LINE SEPARATING TODAY & YESTERDAY 1) Write: Date: 01/24/11 , Topic: Judicial Branch 2) Next line, write “ Opener #12 ” and then: 1) Write 1 high + 1 low in last 24 hours 2) Rate your understanding of yesterday: lost < 1-5 > too easy (3 is perfect) 3) Respond to the Opener by writing at least 1 sentences about : Your opinions/thoughts OR/AND Questions sparked by the clip OR/AND Summary of the clip OR/AND Announcements: None
2. Agenda 1) Judiciary Intro 2) First Case Intro Primary Objective 1) What is the role of the courts? Reminder 1) Pick and listen to your 4 news podcast by next Monday.
3. Team Quiz (10 Points) Discuss the following questions with your group. Make sure everyone understands how to answer it. Once the quiz paper is passed out, everyone individually writes their own responses. No talking once we start writing. 1 paper will be graded from each group ( 10 points ). Prepare now. Ask Mr. Chiang only if no one in your team knows. When writing, use sentences! 1) Why does the Constitution limit federal power, and how is the law making power of the Fed and states different? 2) What is Article 1 Section 8, why is it especially important?
4. CONSTITUTIONAL CHECKS AND BALANCES: Article 1: Congress/Legislature (House + Senate) Creates the laws Article 2: President/Executive (President + Implied Bureaucracy) Executes the laws Article 3: Federal Courts/Judiciary (US Courts) Interprets the laws (resolves conflicts)
5. Notes #6a , Title: “ Constitution Notes ” 5) Federalism in the Constitution : FEDERAL gov can ONLY do what the Constitution says. Make laws on very specific list of things. STATE government can do (make laws on) ANYTHING except when forbidden by the US Constitution. Parenting Analogy: FED: You can only go to the library. STATE: You can go anywhere except the bar.
6. Power of Taxing and Spending : Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1: Power to buy and spend (for the “General Welfare” is very powerful. Mandates Review: If when the Fed demands the state to do something. If the state refuses, the Fed will deny it money. (States can refuse to obey and lose the money). c1: “Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts”
7. Interstate Commerce Clause (ICC) : Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3: Initially passed to prevent interstate trade conflicts , courts have allowed Congress to use it to pass MANY laws with a loose connection to economic activity . NPC Review: NPC by itself has NO power. Congress has to prove the new law is connected to 1-17 like 3 (ICC), then the NPC lets them make it. c3: “To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states ”
8. Notes #12a , Title: “ Judiciary Notes ” 1) Congressional Law or Act : Congress will create laws it thinks is constitutional, but if challenge, courts decide (judicial review)
9. Notes #12a , Title: “ Judiciary Notes ” 2) Judiciary (interpet Constitution and laws) : designed to be most independent ( protect unpopular/minority ). Power to force actions or strike laws . Constitution 1: Legislature CREATES (S + H) 2: Executive EXECUTES (President) 3: Judicial INTERPRETS (SC, CC, DC) Bureaucracy
10. Notes #12a , Title: “ Judiciary Notes ” 3) Judicial Review : Cases brought to it, judiciary’s power to interpret what laws mean and if laws inline with the Constitution (Marbury v Madison: strike part of Jud Act 1789)
11.
12. Notes #12a , Title: “ Judiciary Notes ” 4) Loose Interpretation : Interpret Constitution loosely to evolve with changing times. 5) Strict Interpretation : Stick to literal word meaning of the Constitution (Scalia)
13. Journ #12a , “ Con Interpretation Debate ” 1) Read the 2 sides, choose 1 side, and write which you choose and explain why . 2) Then write down what your partner thinks ( include their name at the end ). 1 2 3 4 5 CON: Strict 1) More predictable 2) If times change, then let Congress amend the Constitution. 3) Federal judges are nominated for life, its too much power to let decide what laws are. PRO: Loose 1) Strict can lead to unpractical outcomes 2) Times change, laws need to reflect change. 3) The courts are the most qualified to determine the meaning of laws (laws will always need interpreter)
14. Notes #12b , Title: “ Judiciary Notes ” 1) Trial (Mock Trial) : First case, fact finding case 2) Appellate Case (Moot Court) : Appealed case, can only look at mistake of law ( mistakes by judges ) 3) Counsel : Lawyer 4) Judge/Justice (SC) : Decides what the law is 5) Jury : Decides what the facts are: what really happened? (jury can be waived) 6) Plantiff ( π or P ) : Harmed 7) Defendant ( Δ or D ) : Accused 8) Appellant ( a ) : Person who lost lower case, and appeals to higher ( 1: District Court > 2: Circuit Court of Appeals > 3: Supreme Court) 9) Respondant ( r ) : Person who must defend their lower case victory (only loser can appeal)
15.
16. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States (among the 17 things Congress has the power to make laws on, Amendments gave Congress a few more)
17. Oral Argument Structure 1) Greeting Statements (both sides come up) 2) Issue Statements (both sides come up) 3) Facts(both sides come up) 4) Initial Arguments (appellant first, respondent second) 5) Rebuttals (appellant first, respondent second) 6) Closing Statements(both sides come up) Always start with your name!
19. Journal #13a , Title “ Moot Court Prep ” FILL-IN (a_) v. FILL-IN (r_) 1) Everyone outline in journal: CASE OUTLINE i) Greeting Statement (prescribed) ii) Issue Statement iii) Facts of the Case iv) Legal Arguments (3 bullets) SKIP: Possible Rebuttals 2) Write down your role , now script what you plan to say during the case (30 sec-1 min each), work as a team Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 (Interstate Commerce Clause) : “ To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States” ( TIP: Plaintiffs are arguing law is un constitut ) Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (NPC) : “ To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers” ROLES 1a) Greeting Statement 1b) Issue Statements 1c) Facts 2) Initial Arguments (2x if 5) 3) Rebuttals 4) Closing Stmt (+ spc ending ) Judges special, see Chiang.
20. Journal #13b , Title “ Federal Power Review ” Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 (Interstate Commerce Clause) : “ To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States” Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (NPC) : “ To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers” Oral Argument Structure 1) Greeting Statements (both sides come up) 2) Issue Statements (both sides come up) 3) Facts(both sides come up) 4) Initial Arguments (appellant first, respondent second) 5) Rebuttals (appellant first, respondent second) 6) Closing Statements(both sides come up) 1a) + :compliment, – :thing to improve, Your decision 1b) Case name + real outcome of the case. 2…4b)
21. 1b) Hammer v. Dagenhart: ruled Cong. can NOT make law on child labor (later, court says Cong. can in US v Darby) 2b) Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US: Cong. can make law banning racism in public accomidations b/c substantial effect on interstate commerce 3b) US v. Lopez: Cong. can NOT make law on gun zones, no substantial effect 4b) US v. Morrison: Cong. can NOT make law on domestic violence, no substantial effect
22. Journal #13c , Title “ Video: Constitution Intro ” 1) Copy Source Title: Annenberg 2…) Discuss questions on the board with a partner. Summarize your discussion ( include their name at the end ). Remember participation points are deducted if off task. 5 Reading/Film Qs Come From These Journal Sections Time Bookmark: 00:00
23. Homework: 1) Study today’s notes + journal sections for a possible journal quiz . 2) Pick and listen to your 4 news podcast by next Monday. Journal Check: If your name is called, drop off your journal with Mr. Chiang ( if requested, points lost if your journal is not turned in )