This document discusses the debt situation and prospects of DTEK Energy, a Ukrainian energy company. It notes that DTEK Energy initiated a six-month standstill with bondholders to negotiate a debt restructuring. The company aims to reschedule debt repayments until 2023 without a principal haircut. The document estimates that under a debt repayment scenario from 2017-2023, the net present value of DTEK Energy's outstanding debt would be 60% of par value. It also discusses expectations for a recovery in DTEK Energy's coal mining and financial performance in 2016.
Metinvest Ferrexpo update_april_2016 (steel, iron ore market)Andriy Gerus
This document recommends buying bonds issued by Ukrainian steel companies Metinvest and Ferrexpo. It argues that despite low current bond prices, both companies will generate positive cash flows going forward due to lower costs from currency devaluation and recovering steel and iron ore prices. The document projects that Metinvest bonds could recover to 78-83 cents on the dollar and Ferrexpo bonds to 79 cents by 2019, as the companies' financial results improve and leverage decreases. It acknowledges risks like further conflict or creditors rejecting debt restructuring, but overall presents a positive outlook for the bonds.
Panalpina, a Swiss freight forwarding company, agreed to pay $81.5 million to settle US justice department and SEC probes into bribery charges. Panalpina admitted to paying at least $49 million in bribes between 2002-2007 in several countries to help clients avoid customs processes and smuggle goods. It said Shell's Nigerian unit specifically requested false invoices to disguise bribe payments. Shell agreed to pay $48.1 million to settle the charges. The IMF executive board voted to approve a governance overhaul shifting more power to emerging economies like China, Brazil, Russia and India, increasing their voting shares and representation on the board.
Business Plan Adjustments for 2010.Operational and Financial Results of JSC “...Lenenergo IR
The document summarizes operational and financial results for JSC "Lenenergo" for the first 9 months of 2010 compared to the original 2010 business plan and the adjusted 2010 business plan. Key highlights include an increase in productive electricity supply, connected capacity, and revenues from technological connections, as well as higher net profit and EBITDA than projected. Electricity losses in the company's networks decreased. The investment program disbursement and funding were above targets due to higher property obligations from applicants and property acceptance under technological connection contracts.
Russia's transition to a market economy was difficult and led to a serious financial crisis in 1998 as fiscal reforms failed and budget deficits increased reliance on short-term borrowing. Lower oil and mineral prices along with the Asian financial crisis exacerbated problems, causing rapid currency devaluation, capital flight, and debt payment issues. However, Russia weathered the crisis relatively well, with GDP growth, currency and inflation stability returning by 2009 as investment increased. While still dependent on oil and gas exports, Russia has made progress paying foreign debts and building currency reserves, aided by budget, trade, and current account surpluses. In 2008, Russia split its Stabilization Fund created in 2004 to balance the budget during oil price drops into a Reserve Fund
Stock markets declined broadly in June due to concerns over Greece, with the S&P500 down 2.1% and Stoxx Europe 50 down 4.6%. Crude oil prices also fell due to oversupply. The utility sector declined 7.4%, hit by rising bond yields, with regulated companies down 9.2%. Snam stock closed down 5.2% but outperformed the sector due to positive response to regulatory review of rate of return criteria. Snam renewed its EMTN bond program up to 12 billion euros and the ECB extended its quantitative easing program to purchase bonds from select European companies including Snam.
- Stock indices declined in September due to concerns over economic slowdown in China and emerging markets as well as weaker than expected US jobs data. Oil prices also fell due to excess supply and high stockpiles.
- Most sectors declined, especially materials and automotive which were impacted by China and Volkswagen issues. Utilities fell 2.4% while defensive and other sectors rose.
- Snam shares rose 5.3%, outperforming markets due to stability amid volatility. Snam signed an MOU with Socar to cooperate on developing the Southern Gas Corridor to Europe. Snam was again included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
The document discusses the economic impact of Brexit on the global economy. It finds that Brexit will negatively impact UK and EU growth in the short-term due to increased uncertainty from the withdrawal process. UK GDP growth is projected to slow from 2.5% to 1.7% in the coming years as investment and consumption weaken. EU growth will also slow but only modestly given the UK's smaller share of EU trade. The impact on other regions is expected to be small.
MLC Corporation, a US company, was considering expanding its business in Russia in 2008 given growth in Russia's energy sector. Its options were to expand exports, build a manufacturing plant in Russia, or wait out economic uncertainties. In 2008, MLC derived most of its revenues from Russia. While Russia saw strong GDP growth, the global financial crisis emerged that year, with concerns about its potential impact on Russia including a leadership change, energy prices, US-Russia relations, and effects on the Russian economy. MLC eventually decided to invest in Russia by building a manufacturing plant and distribution center, taking advantage of Russia's economic growth despite risks from the global crisis.
Metinvest Ferrexpo update_april_2016 (steel, iron ore market)Andriy Gerus
This document recommends buying bonds issued by Ukrainian steel companies Metinvest and Ferrexpo. It argues that despite low current bond prices, both companies will generate positive cash flows going forward due to lower costs from currency devaluation and recovering steel and iron ore prices. The document projects that Metinvest bonds could recover to 78-83 cents on the dollar and Ferrexpo bonds to 79 cents by 2019, as the companies' financial results improve and leverage decreases. It acknowledges risks like further conflict or creditors rejecting debt restructuring, but overall presents a positive outlook for the bonds.
Panalpina, a Swiss freight forwarding company, agreed to pay $81.5 million to settle US justice department and SEC probes into bribery charges. Panalpina admitted to paying at least $49 million in bribes between 2002-2007 in several countries to help clients avoid customs processes and smuggle goods. It said Shell's Nigerian unit specifically requested false invoices to disguise bribe payments. Shell agreed to pay $48.1 million to settle the charges. The IMF executive board voted to approve a governance overhaul shifting more power to emerging economies like China, Brazil, Russia and India, increasing their voting shares and representation on the board.
Business Plan Adjustments for 2010.Operational and Financial Results of JSC “...Lenenergo IR
The document summarizes operational and financial results for JSC "Lenenergo" for the first 9 months of 2010 compared to the original 2010 business plan and the adjusted 2010 business plan. Key highlights include an increase in productive electricity supply, connected capacity, and revenues from technological connections, as well as higher net profit and EBITDA than projected. Electricity losses in the company's networks decreased. The investment program disbursement and funding were above targets due to higher property obligations from applicants and property acceptance under technological connection contracts.
Russia's transition to a market economy was difficult and led to a serious financial crisis in 1998 as fiscal reforms failed and budget deficits increased reliance on short-term borrowing. Lower oil and mineral prices along with the Asian financial crisis exacerbated problems, causing rapid currency devaluation, capital flight, and debt payment issues. However, Russia weathered the crisis relatively well, with GDP growth, currency and inflation stability returning by 2009 as investment increased. While still dependent on oil and gas exports, Russia has made progress paying foreign debts and building currency reserves, aided by budget, trade, and current account surpluses. In 2008, Russia split its Stabilization Fund created in 2004 to balance the budget during oil price drops into a Reserve Fund
Stock markets declined broadly in June due to concerns over Greece, with the S&P500 down 2.1% and Stoxx Europe 50 down 4.6%. Crude oil prices also fell due to oversupply. The utility sector declined 7.4%, hit by rising bond yields, with regulated companies down 9.2%. Snam stock closed down 5.2% but outperformed the sector due to positive response to regulatory review of rate of return criteria. Snam renewed its EMTN bond program up to 12 billion euros and the ECB extended its quantitative easing program to purchase bonds from select European companies including Snam.
- Stock indices declined in September due to concerns over economic slowdown in China and emerging markets as well as weaker than expected US jobs data. Oil prices also fell due to excess supply and high stockpiles.
- Most sectors declined, especially materials and automotive which were impacted by China and Volkswagen issues. Utilities fell 2.4% while defensive and other sectors rose.
- Snam shares rose 5.3%, outperforming markets due to stability amid volatility. Snam signed an MOU with Socar to cooperate on developing the Southern Gas Corridor to Europe. Snam was again included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
The document discusses the economic impact of Brexit on the global economy. It finds that Brexit will negatively impact UK and EU growth in the short-term due to increased uncertainty from the withdrawal process. UK GDP growth is projected to slow from 2.5% to 1.7% in the coming years as investment and consumption weaken. EU growth will also slow but only modestly given the UK's smaller share of EU trade. The impact on other regions is expected to be small.
MLC Corporation, a US company, was considering expanding its business in Russia in 2008 given growth in Russia's energy sector. Its options were to expand exports, build a manufacturing plant in Russia, or wait out economic uncertainties. In 2008, MLC derived most of its revenues from Russia. While Russia saw strong GDP growth, the global financial crisis emerged that year, with concerns about its potential impact on Russia including a leadership change, energy prices, US-Russia relations, and effects on the Russian economy. MLC eventually decided to invest in Russia by building a manufacturing plant and distribution center, taking advantage of Russia's economic growth despite risks from the global crisis.
- Stock markets declined broadly in August due to signs of slowing economic growth in China. Oil prices rose but remained at low levels.
- The utility sector fell 7.3% with energy utility companies declining the most. Snam shares fell slightly less than the market, closing down 2.6% for the month.
- Snam was reconfirmed in the MSCI Global Sustainability Indexes and FTSE4Good Index Series, recognizing its strong environmental, social and governance performance.
This document from the Russian Ministry of Finance presents data and analysis on the Russian economy and fiscal policy. It shows that Russia has a relatively low public debt as a percentage of GDP compared to other countries. The fiscal rule introduced in 2013 has helped maintain a budget surplus even with lower oil prices. GDP growth is expected to pick up in the next 18 months as investment projects progress and domestic demand strengthens. Federal and regional budgets for the first 10 months of 2014 saw increased revenues and a higher surplus compared to the same period in 2013.
The UK economy continues to struggle with slow recovery from the 2008 financial crisis, hampered by austerity measures and declines in the financial and oil/gas sectors. However, UK-GCC economic ties are growing in importance, with the UK serving as a major trade and investment partner for the GCC. GCC investors see the current UK economic weakness as an opportunity and have increasingly invested in high-profile UK assets. Both sides are looking to further strengthen their mutually beneficial economic relationship.
The EU Referendum: The Future of the UK and Europe - Third Edition - July 2016Ewan Kinnear
- Theresa May has become the new UK Prime Minister and appointed key Brexit ministers including David Davis as Secretary of State for Exiting the EU.
- The process for the UK leaving the EU is set out in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which allows for a two-year period of negotiations to agree the terms of withdrawal.
- It remains unclear when the UK government will trigger Article 50 as Theresa May has said it will not be this year, but the negotiation period is expected to take place from late 2016 through 2018.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is the largest publicly traded energy partnership in the United States. They operate over 51,000 miles of pipelines transporting natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and petrochemicals. Analysts expect EPD to benefit from increased domestic energy production and have ongoing capital projects. Based on a discounted cash flow valuation, analysts value EPD at $41.43 and have placed a BUY rating due to the current price of $37.40 being undervalued.
BRSA Bank-Only Earnings Presentation, December 31, 2011 Garanti Bank
Garanti Bank announced its unconsolidated financial statements dated December 31st, 2011. In 2011, the Bank reached total assets of TL 146.6 billion and net profit of TL 3 billion 70 million. Garanti Bank delivered an ROAE (Return on Average Equity) of 18.2% and ROAA (Return on Average Assets) of 2.2%.
Gold prices held steady after rising the previous day as the dollar retreated from highs. British Prime Minister Theresa May secured backing for her Brexit deal while Italy resubmitted its budget proposal to the EU. US consumer prices rose the most in nine months pointing to higher inflation and interest rates. Copper and nickel prices traded in a narrow range with copper supported at its moving average and nickel seeing slower domestic demand. Oil prices fell on oversupply concerns as production rises and economic outlook dims.
Gold prices held steady after rising the previous day as the dollar retreated from highs. British Prime Minister Theresa May secured backing for her Brexit deal while Italy resubmitted its budget proposal to the EU. US consumer prices rose the most in nine months pointing to higher inflation and interest rates. Copper and nickel prices traded in a narrow range with copper supported at its moving average and nickel seeing slower domestic demand. Oil prices fell on oversupply concerns as production rises and economic outlook dims.
Speech by Olli Rehn at the Euro Conference LatviaLatvijas Banka
Presentation by Vice-President of the European Commission and member of the Commission responsible for Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Euro Olli Rehn at the Euro Conference Latvia.
Riga, September 12, 2013.
The document summarizes recent economic developments in Russia. It notes that while external factors like rising oil prices and capital inflows have provided some relief, domestic vulnerabilities remain. The economy contracted sharply in 2009 but the rate of contraction slowed in the third quarter. Expansionary fiscal and monetary policies are mitigating the downturn but risks remain from growing deficits, weak corporate balance sheets, unemployment, and an still recovering banking sector. Growth is forecast to recover to 4.3% in 2010 but the medium term outlook is muted without reforms to address financial imbalances and boost productivity and competition. Domestic demand from households and businesses remains weak.
This document provides a macroeconomic developments report for June 2015. It discusses developments in Latvia's external sector and exports, monetary policy and financial markets, domestic demand, aggregate supply, costs and prices, and the balance of payments. It also provides GDP growth projections for Latvia's major trade partners in 2014-2016 and concludes by revising Latvia's GDP growth forecast for 2015 down slightly to 2.0% while also lowering the inflation forecast.
ELANA Trading research: Bulgarian Banking Sector H1 2014 ELANA Group
ELANA Trading analysis of the Bulgarian Banking sector in the period of first half of 2014. The research report covers the events of the banks run in June, options and scenarios by the end of 2014 as well as lending activity of all banks, loan structure, credit quality, deposits, financial assets and foreign funds, dynamics of interest rates, ranking of banks, review of publicly traded banks data and focus on FIBANK and Corporate Commercial Bank.
Data as of 30 June 2014. Published 31 October 2014. If interested in update or more information, please contact senior analyst Tatyana Vasileva at tel. +359 2 81 000 24 or email: vasileva@elana.net.
- Stock markets rose in May, driven by quantitative easing from the ECB. Oil prices increased for WTI but decreased for Brent.
- The utility sector increased 2.7%, led by regulated companies. Snam shares fell 3.3% due to dividends but rose 2% adjusting for dividends.
- Snam participated in events at the International Book Fair of Turin and the World Gas Conference in Paris to share its international growth.
Macroeconomic Developments Report. September 2020Latvijas Banka
The Macroeconomic Developments Report is published on a semi-annual basis.
Based on data from Latvijas Banka, Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, Ministry of Finance, and Financial and Capital Market Commission, this publication assesses developments of the external sector and exports, financial market, domestic demand and supply, prices and costs, and balance of payments, and provides forecasts for the economic development and inflation.
Vietnam has experienced rapid growth in primary energy consumption over the last decade. Domestic oil and gas production is unable to keep up with rising demand, requiring increased imports. Vietnam is seeking to develop new oil and gas resources through foreign investment and expansion of exploration and production activities abroad. However, domestic oil production is expected to decline significantly by 2020 while demand continues to rise. To address this, Vietnam is planning to bring new refineries online to increase refining capacity and reduce imports of petroleum products, but deficits in liquefied petroleum gas are still expected after 2020. Oil and gas stocks are currently favored investments on Vietnam's stock market due to rising commodity prices and industry fundamentals.
A positive trend in global stock markets in July was driven by developments in the Greek crisis. Oil prices declined sharply due to weak fundamentals and increased Iranian supply. Snam shares closed up 5% in July, outperforming utility sector indexes, as half-year results met expectations. Snam reported a 9.1% rise in first half net profit supported by infrastructure investments and contributions from associates.
- Stock markets were mostly positive in September, supported by expansionary monetary policy from the ECB. Crude oil prices fell due to weak global demand.
- The utility sector rose 1.9% led by gains in energy companies. Snam shares fell 1% underperforming peers and indices.
- Snam's acquisition of TAG, a strategic gas pipeline company, was approved to strengthen Snam's role in European energy infrastructure.
- In January 2016, the Bord Gáis Energy Index fell 7% as wholesale prices declined for Brent crude oil (-7%), UK gas (-9%), European coal (-3%), and Irish electricity (-8%).
- Brent oil prices hit 12-year lows of $27.88/barrel in January due to oversupply and the lifting of Iranian sanctions.
- UK natural gas prices averaged 32.02 pence/therm in January, down from 34.16 pence/therm in December, as mild weather and ample supplies weighed on prices.
- Most energy commodity prices recorded losses in January as supply remained high and demand was weak.
The Ukrainian currency lost another 1% against the dollar last week. A corruption scandal weakened the government but also strengthened its position by allowing it to portray itself as reformist. Ukraine had a rare current account surplus in December of $418 million due to lower natural gas imports, but the surplus is not expected to be sustainable. Total public debt rose to 80.6% of GDP by the end of 2015, double the level from two years ago.
The document provides highlights from recent energy outlooks published by IEA, OPEC, and EIA:
- 2022 estimates from the agencies largely align but 2023 forecasts diverge more due to uncertainties.
- By 2030, scenarios show energy demand rising 8-12% except in IEA's NZE scenario. Fossil fuels remain a large share of the mix.
- By 2045, scenarios vary from a 15% decline to a 28% rise in primary energy demand. Fossil fuels remain above 50% in most scenarios.
- Comparisons to other outlooks show a wide range of projections underscoring transition uncertainties and policy impact.
- Stock markets declined broadly in August due to signs of slowing economic growth in China. Oil prices rose but remained at low levels.
- The utility sector fell 7.3% with energy utility companies declining the most. Snam shares fell slightly less than the market, closing down 2.6% for the month.
- Snam was reconfirmed in the MSCI Global Sustainability Indexes and FTSE4Good Index Series, recognizing its strong environmental, social and governance performance.
This document from the Russian Ministry of Finance presents data and analysis on the Russian economy and fiscal policy. It shows that Russia has a relatively low public debt as a percentage of GDP compared to other countries. The fiscal rule introduced in 2013 has helped maintain a budget surplus even with lower oil prices. GDP growth is expected to pick up in the next 18 months as investment projects progress and domestic demand strengthens. Federal and regional budgets for the first 10 months of 2014 saw increased revenues and a higher surplus compared to the same period in 2013.
The UK economy continues to struggle with slow recovery from the 2008 financial crisis, hampered by austerity measures and declines in the financial and oil/gas sectors. However, UK-GCC economic ties are growing in importance, with the UK serving as a major trade and investment partner for the GCC. GCC investors see the current UK economic weakness as an opportunity and have increasingly invested in high-profile UK assets. Both sides are looking to further strengthen their mutually beneficial economic relationship.
The EU Referendum: The Future of the UK and Europe - Third Edition - July 2016Ewan Kinnear
- Theresa May has become the new UK Prime Minister and appointed key Brexit ministers including David Davis as Secretary of State for Exiting the EU.
- The process for the UK leaving the EU is set out in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which allows for a two-year period of negotiations to agree the terms of withdrawal.
- It remains unclear when the UK government will trigger Article 50 as Theresa May has said it will not be this year, but the negotiation period is expected to take place from late 2016 through 2018.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is the largest publicly traded energy partnership in the United States. They operate over 51,000 miles of pipelines transporting natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and petrochemicals. Analysts expect EPD to benefit from increased domestic energy production and have ongoing capital projects. Based on a discounted cash flow valuation, analysts value EPD at $41.43 and have placed a BUY rating due to the current price of $37.40 being undervalued.
BRSA Bank-Only Earnings Presentation, December 31, 2011 Garanti Bank
Garanti Bank announced its unconsolidated financial statements dated December 31st, 2011. In 2011, the Bank reached total assets of TL 146.6 billion and net profit of TL 3 billion 70 million. Garanti Bank delivered an ROAE (Return on Average Equity) of 18.2% and ROAA (Return on Average Assets) of 2.2%.
Gold prices held steady after rising the previous day as the dollar retreated from highs. British Prime Minister Theresa May secured backing for her Brexit deal while Italy resubmitted its budget proposal to the EU. US consumer prices rose the most in nine months pointing to higher inflation and interest rates. Copper and nickel prices traded in a narrow range with copper supported at its moving average and nickel seeing slower domestic demand. Oil prices fell on oversupply concerns as production rises and economic outlook dims.
Gold prices held steady after rising the previous day as the dollar retreated from highs. British Prime Minister Theresa May secured backing for her Brexit deal while Italy resubmitted its budget proposal to the EU. US consumer prices rose the most in nine months pointing to higher inflation and interest rates. Copper and nickel prices traded in a narrow range with copper supported at its moving average and nickel seeing slower domestic demand. Oil prices fell on oversupply concerns as production rises and economic outlook dims.
Speech by Olli Rehn at the Euro Conference LatviaLatvijas Banka
Presentation by Vice-President of the European Commission and member of the Commission responsible for Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Euro Olli Rehn at the Euro Conference Latvia.
Riga, September 12, 2013.
The document summarizes recent economic developments in Russia. It notes that while external factors like rising oil prices and capital inflows have provided some relief, domestic vulnerabilities remain. The economy contracted sharply in 2009 but the rate of contraction slowed in the third quarter. Expansionary fiscal and monetary policies are mitigating the downturn but risks remain from growing deficits, weak corporate balance sheets, unemployment, and an still recovering banking sector. Growth is forecast to recover to 4.3% in 2010 but the medium term outlook is muted without reforms to address financial imbalances and boost productivity and competition. Domestic demand from households and businesses remains weak.
This document provides a macroeconomic developments report for June 2015. It discusses developments in Latvia's external sector and exports, monetary policy and financial markets, domestic demand, aggregate supply, costs and prices, and the balance of payments. It also provides GDP growth projections for Latvia's major trade partners in 2014-2016 and concludes by revising Latvia's GDP growth forecast for 2015 down slightly to 2.0% while also lowering the inflation forecast.
ELANA Trading research: Bulgarian Banking Sector H1 2014 ELANA Group
ELANA Trading analysis of the Bulgarian Banking sector in the period of first half of 2014. The research report covers the events of the banks run in June, options and scenarios by the end of 2014 as well as lending activity of all banks, loan structure, credit quality, deposits, financial assets and foreign funds, dynamics of interest rates, ranking of banks, review of publicly traded banks data and focus on FIBANK and Corporate Commercial Bank.
Data as of 30 June 2014. Published 31 October 2014. If interested in update or more information, please contact senior analyst Tatyana Vasileva at tel. +359 2 81 000 24 or email: vasileva@elana.net.
- Stock markets rose in May, driven by quantitative easing from the ECB. Oil prices increased for WTI but decreased for Brent.
- The utility sector increased 2.7%, led by regulated companies. Snam shares fell 3.3% due to dividends but rose 2% adjusting for dividends.
- Snam participated in events at the International Book Fair of Turin and the World Gas Conference in Paris to share its international growth.
Macroeconomic Developments Report. September 2020Latvijas Banka
The Macroeconomic Developments Report is published on a semi-annual basis.
Based on data from Latvijas Banka, Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, Ministry of Finance, and Financial and Capital Market Commission, this publication assesses developments of the external sector and exports, financial market, domestic demand and supply, prices and costs, and balance of payments, and provides forecasts for the economic development and inflation.
Vietnam has experienced rapid growth in primary energy consumption over the last decade. Domestic oil and gas production is unable to keep up with rising demand, requiring increased imports. Vietnam is seeking to develop new oil and gas resources through foreign investment and expansion of exploration and production activities abroad. However, domestic oil production is expected to decline significantly by 2020 while demand continues to rise. To address this, Vietnam is planning to bring new refineries online to increase refining capacity and reduce imports of petroleum products, but deficits in liquefied petroleum gas are still expected after 2020. Oil and gas stocks are currently favored investments on Vietnam's stock market due to rising commodity prices and industry fundamentals.
A positive trend in global stock markets in July was driven by developments in the Greek crisis. Oil prices declined sharply due to weak fundamentals and increased Iranian supply. Snam shares closed up 5% in July, outperforming utility sector indexes, as half-year results met expectations. Snam reported a 9.1% rise in first half net profit supported by infrastructure investments and contributions from associates.
- Stock markets were mostly positive in September, supported by expansionary monetary policy from the ECB. Crude oil prices fell due to weak global demand.
- The utility sector rose 1.9% led by gains in energy companies. Snam shares fell 1% underperforming peers and indices.
- Snam's acquisition of TAG, a strategic gas pipeline company, was approved to strengthen Snam's role in European energy infrastructure.
- In January 2016, the Bord Gáis Energy Index fell 7% as wholesale prices declined for Brent crude oil (-7%), UK gas (-9%), European coal (-3%), and Irish electricity (-8%).
- Brent oil prices hit 12-year lows of $27.88/barrel in January due to oversupply and the lifting of Iranian sanctions.
- UK natural gas prices averaged 32.02 pence/therm in January, down from 34.16 pence/therm in December, as mild weather and ample supplies weighed on prices.
- Most energy commodity prices recorded losses in January as supply remained high and demand was weak.
The Ukrainian currency lost another 1% against the dollar last week. A corruption scandal weakened the government but also strengthened its position by allowing it to portray itself as reformist. Ukraine had a rare current account surplus in December of $418 million due to lower natural gas imports, but the surplus is not expected to be sustainable. Total public debt rose to 80.6% of GDP by the end of 2015, double the level from two years ago.
The document provides highlights from recent energy outlooks published by IEA, OPEC, and EIA:
- 2022 estimates from the agencies largely align but 2023 forecasts diverge more due to uncertainties.
- By 2030, scenarios show energy demand rising 8-12% except in IEA's NZE scenario. Fossil fuels remain a large share of the mix.
- By 2045, scenarios vary from a 15% decline to a 28% rise in primary energy demand. Fossil fuels remain above 50% in most scenarios.
- Comparisons to other outlooks show a wide range of projections underscoring transition uncertainties and policy impact.
1. Vietnam has experienced rapid economic development which has led to a large increase in energy demand that has exceeded supply. Investments of $74 billion are needed between 2006-2025 to develop electricity infrastructure and meet the growing demand.
2. Private investment will be critical to meeting Vietnam's energy needs but the country faces challenges in attracting investment including low energy prices, lack of competitive bidding on projects, and unstable regulations.
3. Recommendations include establishing a competitive electricity market, gradually increasing energy prices, requiring transparent competitive bidding, clearly defining and adhering to contract terms, and allowing international arbitration. This would make Vietnam's legal framework more attractive to private investors in developing its energy sector.
The document summarizes changes to electricity charges and tariffs in Ireland that took effect on October 1st. Key points include:
- Charges for operating and maintaining electricity infrastructure set by regulators saw a small reduction this year.
- Typical residential users can expect reductions of 1.0-2.0% depending on their connection level and daily usage profile.
- Wholesale electricity prices in Ireland continue to trade stably around 5.5c/kWh, benefiting from lower global gas prices compared to a year ago.
- Installing variable speed drives on water pumps yielded estimated annual savings of €10,000 for an initial €15,000 investment.
Investment confidence in Australia’s renewable energy sector has significantly improved following the legislation of the revised Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) in mid-
2015, a new Prime Minister that is more supportive of renewable energy and a strong outcome at the Paris climate change conference. The level and pace of investment will need to increase substantially in 2016 and 2017 in order
for liable parties to deliver on the 2020 legislated target and obligation. The Clean Energy
Regulator estimates that for this to happen, around 3000 MW of new renewable capacity should
be committed in 2016.
This paper outlines the status of progress towards delivering on the 2020 target of 33,000 GWh
of new large-scale renewable energy generation. While there will be challenges, this paper finds
that there is reason to be optimistic that the required new investment will be delivered within the
required timeframe.
Snam reported a 5.2% increase in EBITDA for 1Q 2022 compared to 1Q 2021, offsetting the impact of a WACC reduction. Net profit was up 3.8% year-over-year due to strong performance from associates. Revenues increased 16.9% to €838 million driven by regulated transport and new business revenues. Operating expenses rose 58.2% primarily due to costs associated with new business. Net financial debt declined 10% to €12.6 billion impacted by temporary positive working capital effects.
This document provides an overview of Ireland's electricity market and bills, including how power station prices are set half-hourly and impact variable consumer charges. It also discusses factors influencing the Public Service Obligation levy, outlook for weak global energy prices, trends in Irish wholesale electricity prices, and services offered by SmartPower to help businesses optimize electricity procurement and generation.
Vietnam has significant natural gas reserves and is seeking to increase investment in liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure to meet its growing energy needs and transition to cleaner sources of energy. The government has set targets to increase gas and oil in the energy mix and import between 1 to 10 billion cubic meters of LNG annually by 2035 through new LNG terminals, pipelines, and gas-fired power plants. Foreign investors can own up to 100% of LNG projects in Vietnam and benefit from various tax incentives. However, the legal and regulatory framework is still developing, and projects require navigating several approval processes across development, construction, and operation.
Teekay LNG Partners reported distributable cash flow of $40.2 million for Q3-2017, down slightly from $41.0 million in Q2-2017. While net voyage revenues increased due to fewer off-hire days, cash flow from equity-accounted joint ventures declined due to unplanned off-hire. The company recently delivered three new LNG carriers and has 11 more vessels delivering by the end of 2018 to support continued growth. Financing is in place or in progress for these newbuildings.
Capital Power 2016 BMO Capital Markets Infrastructure & Utilities conference ...Capital Power
Capital Power 2016 BMO Capital Markets Infrastructure & Utilities conference CFO Presentation - presented February 4 by Capital Power VP, Taxation & Treasury, Tony Scozzafava
The Potential of Regional Power Sector Integration Gulf Cooperation Council C...Power System Operation
case study is part of an Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP)
project on Regional Power System Integration (RPSI). The objective of the project is to
facilitate and accelerate RPSI projects in developing countries around the world. The project
will draw on international experience and theoretical analysis in this area to provide a
framework to assess:
the economic, financial and environmental benefits that can accrue to regional
power trading;
the institutional and regulatory arrangements needed to sustain and optimize
regional projects; and
the ways in which obstacles to integration have been successfully overcome.
The final output of the project will be an umbrella report, Regional Power Sector Integration –
Lessons from Global Case Studies and a Literature Review. This review will summarize the 12
case studies and literature review undertaken and analyze common themes on barriers to
RPSI and solutions to overcome them.
Economic Consulting Associates was contracted to execute the project. In doing so, we are
working closely with ESMAP and World Bank staff, as well as government officials, utility,
power pool, and regional economic community personnel, and others directly involved in
implementing regional power schemes.
This and other 11 Case Studies are prepared as clear, factual presentations of the selected
projects. The intent is to provide a direct, easily digestible description of each of the selected
projects without imposing an analytic framework or making judgments about the degree of
success. Such analysis will be undertaken at the global level, considering the entirety of
experiences from the Case Studies, in the aforementioned umbrella report.
All 12 Case Studies follow a uniform structure to facilitate ease of comparison and reference
from one Study to the next. Some sections are longer than others, depending on the specifics
of the Study. Additionally, there is some cross-referencing within each Study.
This document provides an overview of energy use and the electricity sector in Saudi Arabia. It discusses that Saudi Arabia relies heavily on oil revenues and production, with oil making up 90-95% of export earnings. It also has significant natural gas resources. The electricity sector is growing rapidly to meet increasing demand of 5% or more annually. Current installed capacity is 27,260 MW but plans are in place to increase this to 66,400 MW by 2023 to accommodate population and economic growth. Energy use is dominated by transportation, power generation and industrial consumption. The institutional structure governing the energy sector is spread across various ministries and companies rather than centralized under a single authority.
This document summarizes the key issues facing Pakistan's economy and energy security, specifically in the power sector. It identifies three main causes of the ongoing problems: (1) an unwillingness by many to pay the true price for electricity due to subsidies and lack of enforcement, (2) political pressure to maintain subsidies across all consumers rather than targeting the poor, and (3) high transmission losses from theft and poor infrastructure that amount to $1.7 billion annually. The document evaluates some proposed solutions in Pakistan's new National Power Policy to address tariffs, losses, and competition, but questions who will be responsible to implement and oversee the reforms across different agencies.
This document summarizes the key issues facing Pakistan's economy and energy security, specifically in the power sector. It identifies three main causes of the ongoing problems: (1) an unwillingness by many to pay the actual costs of electricity due to subsidies; (2) political pressure to maintain subsidies across all consumers; and (3) high transmission losses and theft due in part to weak accountability. The document reviews various proposals in Pakistan's new National Power Policy to address these issues through tariff reforms, curbing losses, and increasing competition in generation. Overall it argues comprehensive reforms are needed across regulatory bodies, state-owned companies, and the civil service to resolve the systemic problems plaguing the power sector.
ET April 2023 Investor Presentation_Final.pdfssuser6f254f1
Energy Transfer held an investor presentation in April 2023 to provide operational and financial updates. The presentation contained forward-looking statements about future performance and discussed recent record volumes in midstream operations. It also highlighted strategic acquisitions that expanded the company's Permian Basin footprint and provided an overview of Energy Transfer's integrated national asset portfolio.
- Teekay LNG Partners presented its Q4-2016 earnings and provided an outlook for 2017.
- In Q4-2016, Teekay LNG generated distributable cash flow of $50.2 million and cash flow from vessel operations of $114.5 million.
- Teekay LNG completed $1.7 billion in debt and equity financings in Q4-2016 to fund its growth projects, increasing its pro forma liquidity to $446 million.
Dr. Oliver Massmann - Future Energy of Vietnam - Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Oliver Massmann
The document summarizes Vietnam's Power Development Plan 8 (PDP8), which aims to ensure energy security and meet renewable energy targets by 2050. Key points of the PDP8 include increasing renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind) to 47% of the energy mix by 2030, developing transmission infrastructure, and encouraging rooftop solar and private sector investment through power purchase agreements and a pilot direct power purchase program. The PDP8 also addresses current electricity challenges around supply shortages and congestion inhibiting renewable projects.
Energy a practical approach for the benefit of sustainable economic develop...Lulzim
ENERGY- A PRACTICAL APPROACH IN FAVOUR OF A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN KOSOVO
POLICY BRIEF KOSOVO
On the occasion of the EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung publishes the new policy brief about Energy and Energy efficiency titled "ENERGY - A practical approach in favor of a sustainable economic development in Kosovo" written by Lulzim Syla from Kosovo Renewable Energy Association. The document summarizes the main topics and challenges regarding Energy and gives specific recommandations about the following actions that should be fulfilled in favor on a sustainable energy policies.
Energy a practical approach for the benefit of sustainable economic develop...Lulzim
The document discusses energy issues in Kosovo and proposes solutions to improve the sector. It notes that over 1 billion euros have been spent repairing power plants and infrastructure, with over 500 million spent on imports and fuel, resulting in losses of over 2 billion euros. It recommends establishing funds to support renewable energy projects and research. It also stresses the need for education programs to develop engineers and technicians for the growing industry, and proposes creating an Institute for Energy and Efficiency to develop policies and expertise.
The Energy Community Secretariat supports Ukraine's Draft Law No. 5322, which aims to transpose the EU's REMIT Regulation on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency into Ukrainian law. The Secretariat is responsible for supervising Ukraine's transposition of agreed energy legislation as part of its Energy Community Treaty obligations. Draft Law No. 5322 is fully aligned with REMIT Regulation requirements, unlike previous draft laws. Upon adoption of Draft Law No. 5322, Ukraine will fulfill its obligation to transpose REMIT Regulation into its national legislation by the deadline of November 2019. The Secretariat offers further support for REMIT Regulation implementation.
This document summarizes recent developments in global coal markets:
- Atlantic thermal coal markets ended the week on a bearish note as European demand remained weak. Colombian coal was traded for delivery to Asia.
- Mediterranean thermal coal prices rose $2 on stronger energy markets, with deals reported between $68-72 per metric ton for Turkey.
- China's thermal coal prices are expected to find support as power generation grew 1% in March and utilities stock up for peak summer demand.
EasyJet has experienced strong growth and financial performance in recent years. It has a leading position in many key European markets and routes. However, it faces some challenges including increasing airport charges, intense competition, and potential disruption from its founder's disputes with the board. Overall, easyJet is well positioned to continue growing its network and capturing opportunities from rising tourism, but must manage costs and risks carefully to sustain its success.
B2B payments are rapidly changing. Find out the 5 key questions you need to be asking yourself to be sure you are mastering B2B payments today. Learn more at www.BlueSnap.com.
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf46adnanshahzad
How to Start Up a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide Starting a company is an exciting adventure that combines creativity, strategy, and hard work. It can seem overwhelming at first, but with the right guidance, anyone can transform a great idea into a successful business. Let's dive into how to start up a company, from the initial spark of an idea to securing funding and launching your startup.
Introduction
Have you ever dreamed of turning your innovative idea into a thriving business? Starting a company involves numerous steps and decisions, but don't worry—we're here to help. Whether you're exploring how to start a startup company or wondering how to start up a small business, this guide will walk you through the process, step by step.
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
Zodiac Signs and Food Preferences_ What Your Sign Says About Your Tastemy Pandit
Know what your zodiac sign says about your taste in food! Explore how the 12 zodiac signs influence your culinary preferences with insights from MyPandit. Dive into astrology and flavors!
How to Implement a Strategy: Transform Your Strategy with BSC Designer's Comp...Aleksey Savkin
The Strategy Implementation System offers a structured approach to translating stakeholder needs into actionable strategies using high-level and low-level scorecards. It involves stakeholder analysis, strategy decomposition, adoption of strategic frameworks like Balanced Scorecard or OKR, and alignment of goals, initiatives, and KPIs.
Key Components:
- Stakeholder Analysis
- Strategy Decomposition
- Adoption of Business Frameworks
- Goal Setting
- Initiatives and Action Plans
- KPIs and Performance Metrics
- Learning and Adaptation
- Alignment and Cascading of Scorecards
Benefits:
- Systematic strategy formulation and execution.
- Framework flexibility and automation.
- Enhanced alignment and strategic focus across the organization.
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...my Pandit
Explore the fascinating world of the Gemini Zodiac Sign. Discover the unique personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights of Gemini individuals. Learn how their sociable, communicative nature and boundless curiosity make them the dynamic explorers of the zodiac. Dive into the duality of the Gemini sign and understand their intellectual and adventurous spirit.
How to Implement a Real Estate CRM SoftwareSalesTown
To implement a CRM for real estate, set clear goals, choose a CRM with key real estate features, and customize it to your needs. Migrate your data, train your team, and use automation to save time. Monitor performance, ensure data security, and use the CRM to enhance marketing. Regularly check its effectiveness to improve your business.
The APCO Geopolitical Radar - Q3 2024 The Global Operating Environment for Bu...APCO
The Radar reflects input from APCO’s teams located around the world. It distils a host of interconnected events and trends into insights to inform operational and strategic decisions. Issues covered in this edition include:
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024SEOSMMEARTH
Buy Verified Payoneer Account: Quick and Secure Way to Receive Payments
Buy Verified Payoneer Account With 100% secure documents, [ USA, UK, CA ]. Are you looking for a reliable and safe way to receive payments online? Then you need buy verified Payoneer account ! Payoneer is a global payment platform that allows businesses and individuals to send and receive money in over 200 countries.
If You Want To More Information just Contact Now:
Skype: SEOSMMEARTH
Telegram: @seosmmearth
Gmail: seosmmearth@gmail.com
Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...my Pandit
Dive into the steadfast world of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the grounded, stable, and logical nature of Taurus individuals, and explore their key personality traits, important dates, and horoscope insights. Learn how the determination and patience of the Taurus sign make them the rock-steady achievers and anchors of the zodiac.
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
Navigating the world of forex trading can be challenging, especially for beginners. To help you make an informed decision, we have comprehensively compared the best forex brokers in India for 2024. This article, reviewed by Top Forex Brokers Review, will cover featured award winners, the best forex brokers, featured offers, the best copy trading platforms, the best forex brokers for beginners, the best MetaTrader brokers, and recently updated reviews. We will focus on FP Markets, Black Bull, EightCap, IC Markets, and Octa.
Best practices for project execution and deliveryCLIVE MINCHIN
A select set of project management best practices to keep your project on-track, on-cost and aligned to scope. Many firms have don't have the necessary skills, diligence, methods and oversight of their projects; this leads to slippage, higher costs and longer timeframes. Often firms have a history of projects that simply failed to move the needle. These best practices will help your firm avoid these pitfalls but they require fortitude to apply.
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdfMJ Global
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
2. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
35
40
45
50
55
60
May
15
Jun
15
Jul
15
Aug
15
Sep
15
Oct
15
Nov
15
Dec
15
Jan
16
Feb
16
Mar
16
Apr
16
May
16
DTEKUA Apr'18 DTEKUA Mar'18
2
Executive summary
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, NERC, Concorde Capital research
0x
3x
6x
9x
12x
15x
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E
EBITDA, USD mln Net debt / EBITDA
DTEK Energy’s debt and EBITDA
1H15
report
Bond to
restructuring
intention
announced
No coupon
news
Standstill
request.
No haircut
news
We estimate the fair value of DTEK Energy’s outstanding debt at 60% of par value, assuming repayment
in 2017-2023 (skewed towards the last year) and a 15% discount rate. Currently, its bonds are traded at
43% of par, which promises spectacular upside. We expect most of the upside will be realized as soon as
the holding is able to reach a restructuring agreement with its creditors.
Meanwhile, it would be logical to expect that DTEK will try singing the blues during the
standstill/negotiation period, which may imply some short-term price risks. Among the fundamental risk
factors is DTEK Energy’s inability to reduce its debt by USD 436 mln via divestment of its Russian assets.
DTEK Energy (or DTEK) is among the key victims of the economic and geopolitical stress that Ukraine has
undergone since early 2014, when Russia sent soldiers to occupy Ukrainian territory.
Heavy devaluation of the local currency and interruptions in DTEK Energy’s coal production resulted in its
EBITDA falling to USD 187 mln in 2015, or by almost 10x (in dollar terms) from 2013. Same time, its dollar-
denominated net debt decreased only 12% in these two years. This led to a jump in its net Debt/EBITDA
ratio from a comfortable 1.5x as of end-2013 to an awful 14.0x as of end-2015. With its increased debt
burden, DTEK Energy had no other choice but to opt for debt restructuring.
The holding was just awarded a six-month standstill from bondholders, which enables it to negotiate on a
long-term restructuring of all its debts, under similar conditions, by late October. The holding
preannounced no principal haircut and debt rescheduling up to 2023.
The scheduled gradual increase in household electricity rates in Ukraine (by 25% - 90% p.a. in 2015-2017)
has enabled all the electricity market participants to count on price hikes for their electricity. DTEK
benefited from a 24% yoy boost in thermal power plant rates in 2015, another 26% yoy increase in 4M16
and will likely enjoy some more increases during the rest of 2016.
In the future, the prices of DTEK Energy’s key outputs – coal and electricity generated from coal – will be
linked to global market prices of coal (API2 index), which will allow the holding to boost its profit from coal
sales (before May, the price was limited by the regulator) and even hedge against local currency
devaluation. This became possible after the state utility regulator amended the rules of coal and power
pricing in Ukraine (which takes effect gradually as of May 2016) and adjusted household power rates.
In the years to come, we estimate DTEK Energy’s two flagship segments, coal and thermal power plants,
will be able to generate about USD 600 mln p.a. in cash EBITDA. This estimate is based solely on the current
regulatory framework in Ukraine. The risk of this regulatory framework changing for worse does exist, but
we believe it’s balanced with the positive risk of beneficial wholesale power market reform and the
introduction of RAB-based regulation for power distribution companies (yet to be approved). With CapEx in
these two segments of about USD 280 mln p.a., and other net spending of USD 20-40 mln, DTEK will be
able to allocate about USD 280-300 mln p.a. to debt holders.
Price of DTEK Eurobonds, % of par
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
Price of electricity sold by DTEK’s TPPs, UAH/MWh
3. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
3
All the worst has already happened in 2015
* Not accounting for receivables provisioning and other non-cash items; **Including EBITDA generated by own-coal burned
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
DTEK Energy’s segment EBITDA*, UAH bln In USD bln
8.1 7.2 6.8
11.2
3.3
2.6
1.0
2.1
1.8
1.4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2013 2014 2015 2016F
Discontinued items
Power export & "other"
Power distribution
Heat
Coal trading
Power generation from coal**
Segment EBITDA
1.01
0.60
0.31 0.42
0.41
0.22
0.05
0.08
0.22
0.12
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2013 2014 2015 2016F
DTEK Energy reported a 66% yoy decline in its EBITDA to UAH 4.1 bln in 2015,
which was the result of a number of factors that should reverse themselves in
the future:
• A 23% yoy decline in coal mining (due to warfare in Donbas) and a 21% yoy
decline in power generation from coal. This resulted in:
• Declining power sales and increasing fuel costs for thermal power plants
by about 32%. Such cost increases weren’t fully compensated by
electricity price adjustments (+24% yoy only).
• Plummeting coal mining by DTEK itself and other mines in Ukraine (-67%
yoy), devastating DTEK Energy’s coal trading operations.
• Increased losses of DTEK Energy’s distribution segment, caused primarily by
warfare in Donbas and worsened payment discipline in the ATO zone.
• Plunging electricity exports of -55% yoy, in volume terms.
• On top of that, DTEK Energy provisioned UAH 3.4 bln of trade receivables
and reported a UAH 1.0 bln loss from non-recoverable VAT, which killed its
reported EBITDA.
Moreover, devaluation of the local currency (and DTEK’s exposure to the
hryvnia) resulted in a 86% yoy plunge in DTEK’s EBITDA in dollar terms in
2015.
In 2016, the situation should change for much better. We forecast:
• Coal mining in the war-afflicted zone will increase by about 35% yoy (+120% yoy in
1Q16), which will allow DTEK Energy to benefit from:
o Non-increasing coal production costs, on a scale effect;
o An increased load on its coal-fired power plants and thus improved fuel
efficiency. With minimal cost inflation at power plants, DTEK will benefit from
about a 27% yoy increase in rates for generated electricity (+26% yoy in 4M16).
• More Importantly, Ukrainian coal prices will be tied to global benchmarks as of May
2016, meaning DTEK’s coal business and related power-generating business will not
be beholden to the volatility of the local currency any more.
• Losses at DTEK’s distribution segment will be significantly reduced. Payment
discipline of the wholesale market will likely improve, which will prevent high loss
provisioning.
What DTEK won’t be able to reverse is:
• The loss of its profitable coal-trading business, given that most of Ukraine’s coal
mines are left in the occupied territory, and the loss of political power by DTEK’s key
shareholder, which could have enabled him to trade such risky coal in Ukraine.
• Poor payment discipline for power supplied to the occupied territory on Donbas – the
holding will likely continue suffering from underpayments of about UAH 0.9 bln p.a.
5. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
5
Debt restructuring – yet to be agreed upon, only some parameters are known
DTEK Energy initiated a standstill agreement in late March, which has been
recently approved by the majority of its bondholders. The standstill will last
till Oct. 28, which buys some time for the holding to agree on a broader debt
restructuring with all its creditors.
During the standstill, DTEK Energy will:
• Report monthly on its operations;
• Report quarterly on its financials and liquidity;
• Pay monthly 10% of accrued interest on all debts, and repay no debt,
except the outlined essential debt (USD 36.1 mln outstanding as of end-
1Q16). In particular, the holding is going to pay 10% of unpaid coupons on
its Eurobonds in early May. The unpaid interest will be capitalized as non-
interest-bearing debt;
o The main provider of the loan that DTEK Energy defines as essential is
Ukraine’s State Savings Bank, which is a clearing operator on Ukraine’s
wholesale electricity market. Clearly, DTEK should not default to it.
• Pay additional interest (and repay principal) on all its debt, if its
unrestricted cash for the month will exceed USD 110 mln (vs. USD 37 mln
as of end-March), which is very unlikely;
• Limit CapEx to USD 30 mln per month, with the possibility to carry over
the unutilized limit.
Divestment of Russian mines
On top of that, DTEK Energy announced it may enter into a deleveraging
transaction to sell its Russian assets (coal mines and enrichment factories).
The holding is going to sell the assets together with its debt in the amount of
USD 436 mln. If successful, the deal will result in a 17% decrease in DTEK
Energy’s debt, from the end-1Q16 amount, to USD 2,107 mln.
We consider such a deal as a real bargain for DTEK Energy, and we don’t even
want to speculate on who will be a buyer of a coal asset at a multiple of over
3x EV/sales these days.
A failure to complete the deal based on the announced conditions seems to
be the key risk for DTEK Energy’s debt prospects.
The currently discussed parameters of a possible long-term restructuring
include, according to DTEK Energy:
• Equal treatment of all creditors (excluding the holders of essential loans);
• No principal haircut;
• Rescheduling of debt repayment up until end-2023, with “some contractual
amortization schedule including a sizeable balloon repayment at maturity”;
• A reduced cash interest on all the considered debt “until a majority of the
restructured debt has been repaid”, which will be compensated by value-
recovery instruments.
• Returning to a “contractual weighted average” pre-restructuring interest (of
about 9%, we estimate) when a “majority” of debt is repaid.
• Some restrictions on dividends and additional indebtedness.
6. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
6
Modelling debt repayment schedule: estimated NPV of debt is 60 cents per dollar
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
160 160 160 160 160 160
1243
100 100 100 100 100 100
100
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
1,050
1,200
1,350
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Interest payment
Principal repayment
Regular cash flow
Add 3rd party debt recovery
Add new debt (for refinancing)
Assumed cash sources and debt servicing schedule, USD blnTo model how DTEK Energy’s debt repayment schedule could look like, we rest on the
following assumptions:
• Total debt subject to restructuring is USD 2,203 mln (as determined on slide 23);
• DTEK Energy will target full repayment of this debt by 2023, with as much as possible to be
repaid in the last year, as the holding indicated (slide 5);
• DTEK Energy’s average annual EBITDA will be USD 600 mln and available cash flow for debt
servicing will be USD 280-300 mln p.a. (as we determined on slide 24);
• Half of the third-party lending provided by DTEK Energy (USD 407 mln total as of end-
2015) will be recovered in 2023 (slide 23);
• All scheduled debts and interest will be paid in the last calendar day of each year;
• Discount rate used for calculating the cash flow to creditors is 15%;
• Debt markets will reopen for Ukrainian lenders by 2023, and DTEK Energy will be able to
refinance its outstanding debt via new borrowing, so that its resulting debt/EBITDA will not
exceed 1.5x. That means in 2023, it will be able to attract about USD 900 mln in new debt
to refinance the remaining debt of the same amount.
We note that our EBITDA assumption is based only on DTEK’s key segment, coal and power,
and on the current regulatory framework. This forecast does not account for possible benefits
from a reform of the wholesale power market, the introduction of RAB regulation for DisCos,
as well as possible profits for DTEK Energy from its trading operations.
Based on the above assumptions, we have determined that DTEK will be able to allocate
among the existing creditors:
• About USD 1,400 mln in 2023 (including USD 900 mln in new debt; USD 200 mln in debt
recovered from related parties and USD 300 mln in generated free cash flow);
• About USD 300 mln in each of the years 2017-2022.
Clearly, DTEK Energy won’t be willing to allocate all the generated cash flow among debt
holders, so we assume less cash will be available for distribution:
• About USD 1,350 mln in 2023;
• About USD 260 mln in each of the years 2017-2022
Based on the above assumptions, we model that DTEK Energy will:
• Repay USD 1,243 mln in debt in 2023, and USD 160 mln in each of the years 2017-2022.
• Pay USD 100 mln in interest in each of the years 2017-2023. Such interest may be explicitly
agreed upon in the debt restructuring deal, or paid via value recovery instruments.
Such a schedule offers an NPV of 60.2% of the debt’s par value.
In a better case (USD 300 mln available in 2017-2022), we model
DTEK Energy will be able to pay annually USD 130 mln in interest in
2017-2023, repay annually USD 170 mln in principal in 2017-2022
and USD 1,183 mln in 2023). Such a schedule implies an NPV of
65.9% of par.
In the worst case (USD 220 mln available in 2017-2022), we model
DTEK Energy will be able to pay annually USD 70 mln interest in
2017-2023, repay annually USD 150 mln in principal in 2017-2022
and USD 1,303 mln in 2023). Such a schedule implies an NPV of
54.5% of par.
8. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
8
DTEK in Ukraine’s energy sector
Electricity generation in Ukraine, TWh
42.4 40.8 42.6 45.8 44.4 43.2
26.8 31.5 26.9 25.3
20.5 19.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15
Nuclear DTEK Energy CEEN DOEN Other
10.5 11.7 10.7 11.3 11.3 10.8
3.3
4.2
3.6 2.6 2.4 2.3
8.9
8.9
8.7
3.9
1.7 2.8
6.1
6.4
6.5
1.6
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15
DTEK (G) Other (G) DTEK (A) Other (A)
Steam coal mining in Ukraine, mmt*
* ROM coal mining. (G) - coal of G grade (hard steam coal); (A) – coal af A or T grade (anthracite or lean coal); ** “Other” include heat & power plants and renewable
energy producers. Source: Energobiznes, Concorde Capital research
Power generation by sources in
Ukraine, 2015**
DTEK Energy is the most important player in Ukraine’s coal production and power
generation sector. In 2015, it accounted for:
• 85% of Ukraine’s production of steam coal, and almost 100% of official production
of anthracite coal;
• 26% of total power generation in Ukraine and 78% of power generation from coal.
Ukraine has lost control over all its mines producing anthracite coal after Russia
occupied part of Donbas. Seven of the 14 thermal power plants (TPPs) operational in
Ukraine are designed to burn this type of coal. Currently, DTEK is the only official
producer of anthracite coal in the occupied territory. Its production capacity is enough
to fully satisfy anthracite needs of all Ukrainian power plants. In fact, DTEK supplies its
mined anthracite mainly for its three TPPs, while four other anthracite-burning power
plants are focusing on coal from sources other than DTEK.
DTEK is currently self-sufficient in own coal, which enables it to benefit from full
vertical integration of its coal and electricity generating divisions. At the same time,
DTEK’s TPPs located in western Ukraine are buying coal from the state mines located
nearby (see the map on the next slide). DTEK has reported that it makes payments to
the state coal holding with its own coal, mined in eastern Ukraine.
9. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
9
Ukraine steam coal market in 2015
Source: Company data, Energobiznes, Concorde Capital research
1.6
0.7
0.9
13.3
2.9
2.3
4.8
1.0
1.5
2.6
2.2
2.9
3.3
1.3
1.3
0.8
2.5
1.2
0.6
1.4
3.6
4.8 4.5
3.6
1.5 2.2
4.8
6.0
4.9
3.3
2.5
2.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15
Demand, DTEK Demand, other Output, other Output, DTEK
8.6
10.2
7.9
8.8 8.6
7.1
0.8
0.3
1.0
0.8 0.7
1.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15
Demand, DTEK Demand, other Output, other Output, DTEK
1.4
Russia
Hard steam coal balance in Ukraine, mmt
Coal mines (marketable coal, mmt)
Thermal power plants (coal use, mmt)
Controlled by DTEK
Controlled by other
Hard steam coal - key producers and consumers in 2015 Anthracite & lean coal - key producers and consumers in 2015
Anthracite & lean coal balance in Ukraine, mmt
10. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
10
DTEK production cycle: the Russian occupation complicates a lot
Coal consumers,
suppliers
Coal, grade G
31.2 TWhe*
9.5
TWhe *
Coal, grades A, T**
30.0 TWh
WEM operator
41.9 TWh
Electricity consumers
DTEK coal mining
DTEK power
generation
Wholesale electricity
market (WEM)
Coal market
DTEK power DisCos
Retail electricity
market
DTEK value chain in 2015 How it could look without occupation
DTEK business units
Other market
players
Occupied territory of
Donbas
Legend
2.1
TWh
6.7
TWh
Coal
consumers
31.2 TWhe*
9.5
TWhe*
32.1 TWh
6.7
TWh
Coal consumers, suppliers
WEM operator
45.1 TWh
Electricity consumers
Coal, grade G Coal, grades A, T**
Broadly speaking, DTEK Energy is a holding that consists of three major
separate businesses that are not interconnected:
• Mining of anthracite coal (grade A and T) and production of electricity
from this coal for sale to the wholesale market;
• Mining of hard steam coal (grades G, DG) and production of electricity
from this coal for sale to the wholesale market;
• Purchase of electricity from the wholesale market to transmit and sell to
end-users.
Other business include: coal, gas and power trading, production of electricity
from natural gas, heat production and distribution.
* Sellable coal in the equivalent of electricity that it can be converted to; ** Including Russian mines
Source: Company data, Energobiznes, Concorde Capital research
As can be seen from the patterns below, the Donbas war factor heavily affected only one
of DTEK’s core production chains – all coal mines producing A and T grades of coal are
currently located on the occupied territory of Donbas.
DTEK’s other losses due to Russian aggression are:
• Its Zuyivska Power Plant (consuming G-grade coal), which is located on the occupied
territory and has to buy coal from beyond. Since May 2015, this TPP has to sell its
power to the occupied territory by itself, bypassing the wholesale market;
• The part of the service area of DTEK’s three distribution companies (DisCos) is located
on the occupied territory of Donbas. In 2015, DTEK also lost Krymenergo, the DisCo
operating in occupied Crimea.
3.2
TWh
11. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
11
DTEK operations on the occupied territory
Donetsk
Luhansk
Zuyivska TPP
Komsomolets
Rovenki
Sverdlov
Coal deposits:
anthracite
lean coal
other coal
DTEK assets on the occupied
territory of Donbas
Source: Company data, Energobiznes, Concorde Capital research
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Jan-14 May-14 Sep-14 Jan-15 May-15 Sep-15 Jan-16
Komosomolets
Sverdlov
Rovenki
2013 2015
Coal mined 43% 16%
- Anthracite & lean coal 93% 70%
- Other coal 0% 0%
Power generated 11% 6%
Power distributed 14% 7%
Total revenue 14% 6%
Contribution of currently occupied
area of Donbas to DTEK Energy’s
results:
DTEK Energy is still operating three large coal mines and one power plant on the
occupied territory of Donbas. It also operates Dontetskoblenergo, PES-Energougol and
Power Grid – power distributing companies with operations in the partially occupied
Donetsk region. All the assets operational on the occupied territory have been
reregistered by DTEK on the unoccupied territory of Ukraine.
Of all of DTEK Energy’s assets, updated operational information only exists for its
occupied mines. As can be seen in the chart on the right, the mines were able to
partially restore their output in late 2015. In fact, those three mines are the only official
miners of anthracite and lean coal in Ukraine right now. The mines are working at about
1/3 of their production level achieved before the occupation occurred. If the de-
escalation in Donbas continues, these mines have a good chance to significantly restore
their output in 2016.
The key hopes for mining recovery lie in restoring railway routes that would enable DTEK
Energy to boost its coal supplies from the occupied territory. In 2014, due to damaged
roads, the occupied mines increased their coal stockpiles by more than 1.7 mmt, while
last year they fell by about 0.9 mmt, which unfroze a significant potion of working
capital for DTEK (about UAH 1 bln).
Much less clarity exists on the operation of DTEK’s Zuyivska power plant, located on the
occupied territory. This TPP has not sold electricity to Ukraine’s power market since mid-
May 2015, based on a Ukrainian government resolution. It has to find consumers for its
power on the occupied territory by itself. A lot of industrial consumers related to
Akhmetov’s business empire (mostly Metinvest assets) are consumers of Zuyivska
electricity, according to DTEK. There is no public information about the rates at which
this TPP sells its power, nor on collection rates for supplied electricity.
Even less information exists on operations of DTEK Energy’s power distribution business
on the occupied territory, except some news on equipment damage and human losses
related to warfare. The UAH 0.9 bln in negative EBITDA generated by DTEK’s power
distribution business in 2015 is a primarily consequence of its operations in Donbas, we
estimate. On top of that, DTEK Energy reported that UAH 0.94 bln of end-2015
receivables were from clients in the war zone, and payment discipline in the territory
was as low as 35.7%. DTEK does not expect this ratio to improve in the mid-term,
providing the war does not end.
Monthly coal output by current war-exposed mines, mmt
12. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
23.2 23.7 23.7 22.8
16.3 15.6
11.6 11.9
3.2 2.9
2.2
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16
Nuclear Hydro Other TPPs (free area) TPPs (occupied)
12
Distribution of energy generated in Ukraine: TPPs’ share stabilized at 30%
Source: Energobiznes, Donbasenergo, Concorde Capital research
The official electricity statistics in Ukraine suggest power generated by
TPPs decreased 25% yoy in 1Q15 and another 14% yoy in 1Q16.
The fall in 1Q15 was solely attributable to geopolitical and economic
factors:
• Decreasing overall power demand in Ukraine and a decreasing share
of “expensive” electricity supplied by Ukrainian TPPs;
• Decreasing regional demand for electricity in easternmost Ukraine,
where TPPs are the only power sources.
At the same time, the yoy decrease in TPPs’ output in 1Q16 is solely
explained by a statistical effect, namely the exclusion of TPPs located in
the war zone from Ukraine’s electricity statistics (since July 2015). In
fact, the TPPs located on the non-occupied territory of Ukraine boosted
their power output by 3% yoy in 1Q16.
We believe the TPPs working on the non-occupied area reached their
minimum market share in 2015, which is 28%-34% of total power
generated, depending on seasonal factors. This share is unlikely to
decrease in the near future, as TPPs play an important role in
smoothening daily power consumption peaks in Ukraine's energy
system, unlike nuclear power plants that only provide base-load
electricity.
That said, we do not expect significant declines in overall TPP output in
2016, given that industrial production is recovering in Ukraine, and thus
demand for electricity from industries has stabilized. At the same time,
we expect some decline in power consumption by households
(currently consuming about 35% of electricity in Ukraine), as increased
residential power rates will stimulate energy-saving efforts. Also, we
expect an increased share of TPPs burning anthracite, at the expense of
TPPs burning hard coal.
We forecast DTEK’s TPPs will reduce their power generation by 5% yoy
in 2016. On top of that, we expect DTEK’s TPPs will decrease their
power output by about 4%, on average, in 2017-2023.
Share of TPPs in Ukraine’s electricity balance
27%
29%
31%
33%
35%
37%
39%
41%
43%
45%
47%
49%
1Q13 3Q13 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 3Q15 1Q16
As reported
Excluding curently
occpupied area
n.a.
Power generated by sources, as reported officially, TWh
1.43
3.44
6.03
4.78
0.99
0.860.51
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2M15 2M16
G grade (occupied)
A grade (occupied)
G grade (free)
A grade (free)
n.a.
Power generated by TPPs (TWh)
depending on coal grade and location
13. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
13
DTEK Energy key operating data
* DTEK Energy is currently negotiating to sell its Russian mining business
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017-2023 avg. est
ROM coal mining, mmt 41.4 37.1 28.7 28.8 26.8
- Ukraine, hard coal 22.2 21.9 22.0 20.5 20.5
- Ukraine, anthracite 17.8 12.6 4.7 6.3 6.3
- Russia, anthracite 1.4 2.6 2.0 2.0 -*
Est. marketable coal output, mmt 29.4 26.4 20.4 20.4 19.0
- Ukraine, hard coal 15.8 15.6 15.6 14.5 14.5
- Ukraine, anthracite 12.6 8.9 3.3 4.5 4.5
- Russia, anthracite 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.4 -*
Coal sold to third parties, mmt 8.3 5.5 4.2 3.8 3.5
Coal bought from third parties, mmt 7.9 7.7 1.4 1.2 1.0
Use of coal by DTEK TPPs, mmt 25.6 23.4 19.3 18.2 17.1
^ Hard coal 17.7 15.9 15.9 13.8 12.8
^ Anthracite 8.0 7.5 3.4 4.4 4.3
* Own coal 20.8 18.5 17.9 17.2 na
* Third party coal 4.8 4.9 1.4 1.0 na
Power generation, TWh 58.2 52.2 41.0 38.9 37.3
- From hard coal 37.6 33.1 31.4 27.5 26.5
- From anthracite 16.9 15.7 6.7 8.7 8.5
- From natural gas 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.3
Supply of generated power, TWh 53.3 47.8 37.7 35.7 na
^ From hard coal 34.4 30.0 28.8 25.3 24.2
^ From anthracite 15.4 14.3 6.1 8.0 7.8
* From all types of coal 49.8 44.3 35.0 33.3 32.0
^ From natural gas 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.5 na
^ From wind 0.3 0.7 - - -
* Supply to WEM 53.3 47.8 36.4 33.9 na
* Supply to the occupied Donbas - - 1.2 1.8 na
Supply of generated heat, TWh 18.7 15.5 14.4 13.5 na
- From coal 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 na
- From natural gas 17.4 14.3 13.4 12.6 na
Power distribution, TWh 56.9 53.8 45.1 42.0 na
Dniprooblenergo 22.6 23.0 21.7 20.8 na
Power grid 11.3 9.5 8.2 7.4 na
Donetskoblenergo & PES Energougol 9.6 8.1 6.7 5.1 na
Kyivenergo 8.9 8.9 8.5 8.7 na
Krymenergo 4.5 4.3 - - -
15. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
15
Electricity rates for TPPs: growth used to be limited by the regulator
Source: NERC, Energorynok, Concorde Capital research
Ukraine’s electricity market (volumes and prices), January 2016
1.6
UAH/
kWh
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
1.6
UAH/
kWh
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
TPPs
Nuclear PPs
Other
Energorynok,
Ukrenergo
Powerlosses
Power
Distribution
Companies
Powerlosses
Markup to compensate losses
1.53
0.41
0.91
Wholesale
price:
Average 0.72
0.82
1.06
0.53
1.19
1.52
Households
Largeindustrialconsumers
Smallindustrialconsumers
Subsidy
0 TWh 5 10 15 0 TWh 5 10 15 0 TWh 5 10 15 0 TWh 5 10 15
Power producers Wholesale market,
transmission
Power DisCos Power consumers
Distribution &
supply tariff
DTEK’s key profit-generating direction is coal mining and electricity production
from this coal. Profit from this business heavily depends on the electricity prices
set by DTEK’s thermal power plants (TPPs).
In Ukraine, all the electricity produced by TPPs is sold to the wholesale
electricity market (WEM). The price should be based on market principles.
However, the sector regulator has the authority to impose caps on this price for
the stated purpose of preventing inflated electricity prices for final consumers.
In fact, Ukrainian TPPs suffer from a government policy of limiting the growth of
retail electricity prices for industrial consumers.
Currently, industrial consumers are covering the costs to produce and supply
electricity, as well as partially subsidize the low rates charged to households.
To limit the burden for industrial consumers, the regulator tends to limit the
growth of the wholesale price. The easiest way to do this is to limit the prices
charged by TPPs.
The higher the household rates, the smaller is the cross-subsidy pressure on
industrial consumers. The reduced cross-subsidy in turn enables higher
producer rates, including TPPs. This is what is happening in Ukraine now.
Rates are fixed for certain period of time
Rates are variableElectricity rates for producers other than TPPs are
fixed, and so are retail rates for households. To limit
inflation of final prices for industrial producers, the
power sector regulator limits the growth of prices
charged by TPPs.
16. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
Moratorium on
consumer price
growth
16
Household rate growth: much room for TPP prices to increase
Source: NERC, Energorynok, Concorde Capital research
Prices for final consumers, UAH/kWh
Household rates flat
Increase of nuclear &
TPP rates affected
directly industrial
prices
Household rates grew
This enabled raising
nuclear & TPP rates
with limited effect on
industrial pricesPrices of key
producers, UAH/kWh
Household
rate grew;
Industrial
rates grew
Household rates to increase
Ukraine’s power sector regulator ruled to gradually increase household electricity rates
by about 25% each half-year, starting April 2015.
The additional money raised from higher household rates in April 2015 and September
2015 was distributed between three key groups:
• power generators (GenCos), enabling increasing their rates;
• power DisCos, allowing for some increase in their distribution rates;
• industrial power consumers, enabling their electricity prices to grow below the rates
of wholesale market price growth.
DTEK did not capitalize much, so far
As can be seen from the charts on the left, key beneficiaries of the first two waves of
household rate adjustments were nuclear power plants (selling price grew 30% in
Mar’15-Feb’16), as well transmission monopoly (which rate increased 38%).
DTEK claimed it benefited little from the adjustment of household rates last year.
Indeed, it “bit” much less than from the “pie” as compared to state-controlled nuclear
and hydro power producers and some grid operators. Nonetheless, it still benefited (its
TPP selling prices grew 18% in Mar’15-Feb’16) even though it was very last in that
queue.
The new adjustment of household rates (+25% since Mar’16) benefited:
• industrial consumers for a while (their projected price remained flat m/m in March-
April);
• TPPs, which enjoyed a 14% m/m increase in their rates in March and another 13%
m/m in April.
In 4M16, the average rate of TPPs was 26% higher yoy.
New household rate adjustment offers more chances to DTEK
The good news is there are two more 25% increases in household rates planned, and
TPPs have solid chances to benefit more from each of them.
Even better news is - as of May 1, the regulator ruled to increase the benchmark
electricity price (directly affecting the price for industrial consumers) based on a new
methodology of calculating prices for TPPs, which should increase again as of May. See
the next slide for more details.
DTEK was discussing with regulators the need to increase the average rate of TPPs to
UAH 1,250/MWh (+45% yoy) in 2016.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Jul-13 Nov-13 Mar-14 Jul-14 Nov-14 Mar-15 Jul-15 Nov-15 Mar-16
Wholesale
Nuclear
TPP
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Jul-13 Nov-13 Mar-14 Jul-14 Nov-14 Mar-15 Jul-15 Nov-15 Mar-16
Households
Large industrial
Small industrial
17. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
17
New regulation: TPP tariffs will be calculated based on global coal prices
579 615
694
863
1100
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
Selling price of electricity by DTEK’s TPPs, UAH/MWh
Steam coal in Rotterdam, CIF, USD/t
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Concorde Capital research
Steam coal in Rotterdam, USD/t
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F
Historical avg.
Futures
Bloomberg consensus
The Ukrainian power sector regulator approved a resolution in March to amend the methodology of
calculating the benchmark retail price of electricity (the basis for calculating prices for industrial consumers)
to the benefit of DTEK. In particular, resolution #289 of March 3 (valid since March 30) stipulates that TPP
rates (as important part of benchmark price) will be designed to:
• Cover their fuel costs;
• Cover their fixed costs, based on historical figures adjusted for producer price inflation;
• Allow for a certain rate of profitability (the number has yet to be disclosed).
More importantly, TPP fuel costs will be based on the “market” price of coal, calculated as:
• The API2 Index, or CIF price of 6,000 kcal/kg steam coal in ARA (ports of Amsterdam/Rotterdam/
Antwerp), adjusted for calorific value of Ukrainian coal;
• Plus shipment costs from ARA to Ukraine and transshipment costs in Ukrainian ports (about USD 10/t
last year);
• Plus average costs to transport coal from port to TPPs (about USD 4/t last year).
All the prices should be based on average historical numbers of the last 12 months prior to their calculation.
Timing
This new methodology was brought into effect by the regulator starting May 2016. Based on it, the regulator
has already upgraded the benchmark retail electricity price (which was flat at UAH 1.18/kWh since July
2015) to UAH 1.24/kWh since May, UAH 1.28/kWh since July and UAH 1.32/kWh since October 2016.
Benefits from the new coal-pricing methodology for DTEK are:
• It will enable DTEK to sell its coal to the local market at a premium to the API2 Index, in the size of
logistics costs from ARA. The price should be close to USD 60-62/t (net of railway costs), or UAH 1,510-
1,560/t, which is about 30% more than DTEK was able to sell in 1Q16.
• The linkage of local coal prices to global rates and freight costs will be a hedge against currency risk,
which DTEK lacked before.
The drawback is:
• The outlook for the API2 coal price is negative for the foreseeable future – all the forecasts point to the
price remaining below USD 45/t in the next 3-4 years.
If the methodology sustains itself in the future, the “market” price of coal at TPPs would be close to:
• USD 63-65/t in 2H16, implying TPP rates of about USD 44-45/MWh (about UAH 1200/MWh);
• USD 58-60/t in 2017-2019, implying TPP rates of about USD 40-43/MWh. This looks to be not a big
change from average USD 39.5/MWh in 2015, though it’s material for DTEK’s low-margin GenCos.
We forecast DTEK’s TPPs will have UAH 1,100/MWh average rates in 2016. This is remarkable 27% growth
yoy, but 12% less than DTEK hopes.
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
Jan-14 May-14 Sep-14 Jan-15 May-15 Sep-15 Jan-16 May-16
18. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
18
Other regulatory framework: risks and benefits for DTEK
Ukrainian power brokers announced in 2014 its “4-De” policy that should bring Ukraine out
of the crisis: deoligarchization, demonopolization, deshadowing and deregulation. Some of
the declared policy priorities imply risks for DTEK Energy:
Deoligarchization, which is understood by policy makers as efforts to restrict the economic
domination of oligarchs like Rinat Akhmetov. Operating in a heavily regulated environment,
DTEK is among the easiest targets of all of Akhmetov’s assets. Tough rate regulation was
among the key tools of the power brokers. Thus far, it looks like rate pressures on DTEK
have eased.
Demonopolization efforts is a risk for DTEK that has not surfaced yet, but is still lingering.
The anti-monopoly committee of Ukraine has opened a series of investigations against DTEK
in the electricity market. At this stage, we do not see any consequences from it. Though
DTEK has large market share here, this market is heavily regulated nevertheless. DTEK has
much bigger dominance in Ukraine’s coal sector, which is another risk. In the worst-case
scenario, DTEK Energy might be forced to divest some assets to reduce its market share in
the power or coal sectors. However, we do not see this happening any time soon because
there are no such precedents and the president doesn’t seem to have made this a priority.
Privatization of the remaining 25% stakes in a series of coal and power companies,
controlled by DTEK Energy, could bring more headache to the holding. The blocking stakes
in five electricity companies – whose controlling stakes DTEK purchased in 2011-2012 –
could cost DTEK Energy more than UAH 3.3 bln to acquire now, based on historic deal
prices. In the current situation of a cash deficit, such expenditures are not desired for the
holding, which won’t have additional benefits from the stakes (as it fully controls these
companies today).
Another risk for DTEK Energy is the loss of Kyivenergo’s key assets, combined heat & power
plants that Kyivenergo leases from Kyiv city. Kyivenergo’s lease agreement expires in end-
2016 and there is a risk that it won’t be prolonged, or that lease/concession fees will
increase for Kyivenergo. We believe the potential loss of Kyivenergo’s generating assets
(which would turn the company into pure DisCo) will be neutral for DTEK Energy’s
prospects/finances. In 2015, Kyivenergo generated UAH 933 mln in EBITDA (or UAH 448 mln
if receivables for heat won’t be recovered by the company), or 12% (6%) of the holding’s
total. The company’s CapEx of UAH 630 mln has eaten away at all its generated EBITDA.
What should clearly benefit DTEK is anticipated deregulation, or reforms
of the wholesale electricity market and a planned new approach to
regulating Ukrainian power distribution companies (DisCos). We have not
taken into account these two reforms in our mid-term projections of DTEK
Energy’s financials, but we are keeping in mind that any changes in the
market rules should add more cash flow for DTEK.
Reform (liberalization) of the wholesale electricity market will be a clear
benefit for DTEK, who could receive the right to sell a large part of its
generated electricity to final consumers by charging non-regulated prices.
This reform could take effect already in 2H16, but it’s too early for DTEK to
draw benefits from it.
RAB-based pricing of power DisCos is also a part of expected reform in the
sector. Changing from the current “cost+CapEx, zero free cash flow” model
to a model that will enable DisCos to generate profit as a function of their
asset base will also benefit DTEK Energy. Shifting to RAB-based pricing was
postponed many times over the last decade, with the latest attempts being
in 1Q15, 1Q16 and 2Q16. Thus far, the timing and exact effect of this reform
on DTEK Energy are hard to estimate.
20. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
20
Operating EBITDA: coal & power cycle is the key contributor now
Estimated EBITDA generation by DTEK Energy’s segments, UAH bln
Restated EBITDA by DTEK Energy’s segments, UAH bln
*Including EBITDA generated by own coal burned; ** Assuming DTEK’s TPPs burn only own coal, with the remainder is sold to third parties
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
8.1 7.2 6.8
11.2
3.3
2.6
1.0
2.1
1.8
1.4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2013 2014 2015 2016F
Discountinued items
Power export & "other"
Power distribution
Heat
Coal trading
Power generation from coal*
Segment EBITDA
8.9 9.0
7.3
11.6
2.5
0.8
0.5
1.6
1.8
1.4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2013 2014 2015 2016F
Discountinued items
Power export & "other"
Power distribution
Heat
Net coal trading**
Pro forma coal & power
cycle**
Pro-Forma Segment EBITDA
The holding’s operating EBITDA (net of foreign currency and
provisioning effects) decreased 41% yoy (or UAH 5.5 bln) to UAH
8.61 bln in 2015. The core contributors to the decline were:
• Coal & power segment: -25% yoy, or UAH 2.9 bln, primarily
caused by a decrease of coal trading operations (estimated
UAH -1.8 bln), power export (UAH -0.5 bln) and coal
generation from own coal (-UAH 0.3 bln).
• Power distribution segment: EBITDA decreased UAH 1.9 bln.
• Discontinued operations of renewable power generation (UAH
0.9 bln in 2014) and Krymenergo (UAH 0.2 bln in 2014).
That said, we estimate that DTEK Energy’s core segment, coal
mining and production of electricity from coal, remained solid.
Among other factors, a minor decline in the EBITDA of DTEK
Energy’s integrated coal & power cycle is attributable to higher
use of own coal by DTEK’s power plants in 2015. If we model that
DTEK’s power plants burn only own coal, the decline of EBITDA in
such an integrated coal & power cycle would be greater in 2015
(UAH 1.3 bln, or -15% yoy). The decline is prompted by a slow
increase of power rates (+24% yoy), which did not fully cover
inflation in coal production costs (which rose 30% yoy, based on
what DTEK Energy’s management said in an annual conference
call) and the power plants’ decreased fuel efficiency (by 1.3%
yoy).
Assuming DTEK Energy’s coal production costs will increase 15%
yoy in 2016 (which is rather conservative), and electricity rates for
DTEK’s thermal power will increase 27% yoy, we expect its
integrated coal & power segment will increase its EBITDA to
historically high levels, in hryvnia terms. We estimate DTEK
Energy’s EBITDA will reach UAH 14.1 bln in 2016.
21. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
21
Working capital & other deductions from EBITDA
EBITDA to operating cash flow, UAH bln
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
2013 2014 2015
Segment EBITDA 14.55 14.11 8.06
Receivables change -1.29 -2.15 -3.17
- With related parties na -0.50 -1.99
- With Energorynok wholesale market operator na -1.58 -0.36
ST provisions change 1.50 -0.09 -3.11
Payables & prepayments change 2.41 2.60 4.58
Inventories change 1.20 -0.74 -1.34
Other -3.25 0.46 -0.04
OCF before interest & tax 15.12 14.20 4.98
Last year was remarkable not only based on the plunge in DTEK Energy’s operating
profit, but also on the significant cash outflow for working capital, which added much
to the deterioration of its liquidity. Before that, DTEK was efficient in collecting its bills
and controlling working capital.
The most remarkable change of the last year was the worsened payment discipline of
DTEK’s customers. However, contrary to what DTEK was claiming, the key problem
with bill collection was not with its biggest customer, wholesale market operator
Energorynok (responsible for 35% of DTEK Energy’s revenue in 2015), but with related
parties:
Out of a UAH 3.2 bln increase in receivables and prepayments, UAH 2.0 bln were
receivables due from related parties, including:
• UAH 1.2 bln due from DTEK Holding’s gas company (not consolidated by DTEK
Energy);
• UAH 0.5 bln due from Metinvest’s Yenakiyeve Steel Plant.
Hopefully, DTEK Energy will be able to reclaim the related party receivables this year,
given that the ability to generate cash flow has significantly improved recently for its
related gas and steel businesses.
Receivables from Energorynok increased by just UAH 0.4 bln (1% of turnover) in 2015,
and even decreased by UAH 1.4 bln in 1Q16. Moreover, it looks like Energorynok was
among DTEK’s key donors in 2015 – the bulk of the increase in prepayments received
by the holding (UAH 2.1 bln in 2015) is likely to be money from Energorynok. That’s
another risk for DTEK Energy’s liquidity – it will have to repay the granted prepayments
in 2016. Hopefully, such payment will be made from money reclaimed from related
parties, as discussed in the previous paragraph.
What’s also remarkable is that UAH 0.9 bln in receivables are from customers located
on the occupied territory. As DTEK is not expecting improved payment discipline in the
territory, nor is it going to stop supplying power there, a risk exists that it will have to
accumulate about the same amount in receivables in the coming years too.
All in all, we expect DTEK Energy will minimize the cash outflow for working capital in
2016 and further years to the level of money not received from the war zone (about
UAH 0.9 bln p.a.).
22. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
22
CapEx needs – USD 0.3 bln p.a. - important part of liquidity issue
Cash from operations and CapEx, UAH bln
* Planned amount of CapEx, based on our estimates
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
0.30
0.59 0.53
0.27 0.25
0.11
0.37
0.31
0.22
0.09
0.15
0.11
0.08
0.04 0.05
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Plan Fact Plan Fact Fact Plan
2013 2014 2015 2016*
8.2
4.7 4.2
3.2 3.0 2.5
2.9
2.5
2.6
1.0
0.5
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.4
1.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Plan Fact Plan Fact Fact Plan
2013 2014 2015 2016*
Other
DisCos
TPPs
Coal
Undefined
16.9
14.3 14.1
8.6
13.9
8.4
10.1
9.4
0.5
10.410.2 10.3
5.4
4.1
9.7
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E*
Segment EBITDA Net cash from operations CapEx
CapEx, UAH bln CapEx , USD bln
DTEK Energy operates coal, power generation and grid companies with a high level of physical
wearing out. Historically, it has spent more money on improving its assets than it was able to
generate from operations.
To make matters worse:
• Due to historical hyperinflation in Ukraine, D&A provisions do not fully cover the
maintenance CapEx needs of Ukrainian electricity assets;
• The recent devaluation of the local currency, and the heavy link of equipment costs to hard
currency (according to DTEK, about 50% of CapEx components are linked to dollars or euro)
increased the CapEx burden, in local currency terms.
DTEK Energy is seeking to secure USD 30 mln in monthly CapEx during the standstill period of
2016, implying its annual plan is to spend USD 360 mln (or UAH 9.7 bln, based on an assumed
UAH 27/USD average exchange rate). While in dollar terms this CapEx amount does not look
significant, in UAH terms it compares to DTEK’s CapEx in its most fat years. Out of the planned
investment program, about UAH 1.1 bln, or USD 42 mln, is earmarked in the rates of DTEK’s
power distribution companies, based on our estimates.
We believe DTEK Energy will be able to slightly decrease its CapEx appetites in 2016, given its
tough liquidity position. Our vision is that the holding will be able to limit its CapEx to USD
300 mln this year:
• Not all the planned amount can be considered as
maintenance CapEx – we assume about 20% is reserved for
development. Development CapEx makes little sense in the
current situation, in our view;
• In its recent history, DTEK was able to spend no more than
83% of its planned CapEx amount.
23. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
23
Debt repayment: on average USD 0.3 bln p.a. in 7Y if Russian deal succeeds
DTEK Energy debt structure, USD mln
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
935 923 884 895
2442
2119
1530 1436
100
411
227 212
2013 2014 2015 1Q16
Swap
Loans
Eurobonds
386 407
149
2013 2014 2015
Loans to
Borrowing from
Related party balance, USD mln
Total debt as of April 1 2543
Less deleverage of Russian assets -436
Less essential debt -36
Plus interest on debt accrued during standstill 80
Plus coupons accrued during standstill 76
Less repaid interest during standstill -24
Total debt subject to restructuring as of end of standstill 2203
DTEK Energy’s debt subject to LT restructuring, USD mln
DTEK Energy’s total financial debt is reportedly USD 2,543 mln as of end-1Q16. Although it
decreased by 23% in dollar terms from USD 3,476 mln as of end-2013, in local currency terms it
advanced 2.4x for the period. This made the debt burden for the holding extremely heavy, with
its key operations in Ukraine.
DTEK Energy reportedly stopped repaying loans in July 2015 and interest on most loans since
October 2015. As of April 1, the holding has overdue payments of:
• USD 641 mln in banking loans;
• USD 80 mln in interest on loans. Most likely, this interest was accumulated over the last six
months;
• A USD 8.3 mln coupon on its Mar’18 bonds … and later a USD 29.5 mln coupon on its Apr’18
bonds.
Despite being heavily indebted, DTEK Energy has outstanding loan provided to related parties
(USD 407 mln as of end-2015). This debt emerged as a result of a spinoff of DTEK’s oil & gas
business, i.e. it wasn’t a provision of cash loan. The loan generates 7% annual interest for DTEK
Energy since 2015 and is recoverable in 2023-2024. While it’s likely that this debt has an
amortization schedule, for forecasting purposes we conservatively assume it will be repaid in
two equal installments in 2023 and 2024. Based on this assumption, DTEK Energy will generate
annual financial income of USD 28.5 mln p.a. from this lending in 2016-2023.
In its scheme explanatory statement, DTEK Energy:
• preannounced a possible divestiture of its Russian assets, together with outstanding debt in
the amount of about USD 436 mln;
• separated the holders of essential credit lines worth USD 36.1 mln;
• promised to pay 10% of accrued interest monthly during the standstill. That means in the
next six months, DTEK Energy will accrue additionally about USD 80 mln interest on loans
and USD 37.8 mln in coupons. It will pay in cash just 10% of the accrued amount monthly,
and will capitalize the rest.
That means that DTEK Energy will seek to restructure until 2023 total debt of USD 2,200 mln,
or about USD 315 mln, on average, in the next seven years (providing no refinancing is available
at any time). Some portion of this debt could be repaid from loans to be recovered from related
parties.
24. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
24
Mid-term minimum cash generation potential covers CapEx and debt principal
Simple model of DTEK Energy’s average annual
operations for 2017-2023
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
Coal segment
Sellable coal output, mmt 19.0
Coal costs, USD/t -37.5
- incl. D&A -6.5
Coal price, USD/t 54.0
API2 Index 44.0
Plus shipment & transshipment leg 10.0
Coal EBITDA, USD mln 437.0
Power generation
Power sale by TPPs, TWh 32.0
Costs, USD/MWh -38.8
- incl. fuel (@ coal $ 59/t, incl. $ 5/t railway rate) -31.1
- incl. D&A -3.2
Power price, USD/MWh 40.8
- incl. profit spread 5% of total costs 1.9
GenCo EBITDA, USD mln 164.5
Total Coal & Power EBITDA, USD mln 601.5
Plus interest on related party loan, USD mln 28.5
Estimated cash inflow, USD mln 630.0
Coal & GenCo CapEx needs, USD mln -280.0
Estimated free cash flow, USD mln 350.0
API2 coal price, USD/t
40 42 44 46 50
GenCo
regulated
profit spread
5.0% 526 564 602 640 716
7.5% 557 595 633 671 747
10.0% 588 626 664 702 778
Sensitivity of Coal & Power EBITDA, USD mln:
Below we offer a simple model of DTEK Energy’s cash flows based on simple set assumptions, derived
from the valid regulator’s resolution #289 (described in more details on slide 17).
Key assumptions:
• All of DTEK Energy’s business, except its coal and thermal power plants, will generate zero free
cash flow. This assumption may be too optimistic for the short term, given that DTEK’s DisCos and
Kyivenergo generated negative free cash flow in recent years. However, in the mid term, such an
assumption is conservative, given the unavoidable RAB regulation for DisCos, as well as possible
positive cash flow from DTEK’s trading operations (coal trading, power export) in the coming years.
• DTEK will be able to sell its coal locally at the price based on the API2 Index (assumed to be USD
44/t), plus shipment and transshipment costs (assumed to be USD 10/t), as described on slide 17.
• DTEK’s mid-term coal production costs will be USD 37.5/t (including D&A of USD 6.5/t), which is
our estimate for DTEK’s 2015 costs.
• Consequently, DTEK’s TPPs will have coal costs that are equal to the above-derived price, plus
Ukrainian Railway payments (assumed to be USD 5/t). As we have modeled, the resulting USD 59/t
coal cost translates into USD 31.1/MWh of fuel cost. Other-than-fuel costs are modeled to be 20%
of the total costs of TPPs. The regulator will allow for a 5% profit spread to the total costs of TPPs.
• DTEK Energy will also generate USD 28.5 mln in annual interest from a related party loan, as
described on slide 23.
This results in DTEK ability to generate annually USD 630 mln in coal & power EBITDA and financial
income (including USD 601.5 mln in coal & power EBITDA).
Among DTEK Energy’s crucial costs are its CapEx. Based on the holding’s 2016 appetite (USD 360
mln), we estimate its two segments (coal and GenCos) will need about USD 280 mln in annual
investments in the future.
After deducting CapEx, net cash flow would be close to USD 350 mln p.a. – that’s what is available
for working capital, taxes and debt repayment.
If DTEK Energy is able to limit annual working capital, provisions and profit tax charges to USD 50-70
mln p.a. (or UAH 1.4-2.0 bln) in the mid-term, which is possible, it can allocate USD 280-300 mln in
own cash flow among debt holders.
25. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
25
DTEK Energy financial summary
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital research
Key P&L and Cash Flow items, USD mln Key Balance Sheet items, USD mln
2013 2014 2015 2016E
Average UAH/USD rate 7.99 11.92 21.84 27.00
Net revenue 11,609 7,714 4,287 3,690
Adjusted EBITDA as reported 1,820 1,330 187 475
- margin 16% 17% 4% 13%
Adjusted EBIT 1,030 739 -206 162
Operating profit 975 545 -582 0
Net finance costs -411 -894 -459 -254
ForEx losses -40 -1,026 -602 -260
Profit before tax 649 -1,439 -1,643 -534
Net ptofit 417 -1,648 -1,712 -540
Operating cash flow before
working capital, provisions,
interest & tax
1,291 1,259 470 522
Net cash flow from operations 1,261 786 21 390
CapEx -1,290 -450 -186 -305
2013 2014 2015 2016E
Year-end UAH/USD rate 7.99 15.77 24.00 27.50
Non-current assets 8,891 4,825 3,503 3,179
- PP&E 7,846 3,859 2,841 2,480
- Loans to repated parties 0 374 369 407
Current assets 3,013 1,944 1,081 na
- Receivables 1,542 832 667 na
- Cash & equivalents 656 513 29 na
- Loans to repated parties 0 13 38 0
- Restricted cash 7 224 63 na
Total assets 11,903 6,768 4,584 na
Equity 4,344 1,242 230 na
Non-current liabilities 4,973 1,842 1,545 2,509
- Eurobonds 936 743 884 880
- Loans 1,849 232 0 983
- Derivatives 0 411 227 212
Current liabilities 2,587 3,684 2,809 1,338
- Eurobonds 0 180 0 73
- Loans 595 1,886 1,530 82
- Payables 1,678 1,042 865 770
Total loans 2,444 2,119 1,530 1,065
Total Eurobonds 936 923 884 953
Gross derivatives 0 411 227 212
Borrowings from related parties 0 149 0 0
Cash & equivalents 656 513 29 55
Lending to related parties 0 386 407 407
26. СТРОГОКОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНО
26
Available 1Q16 data for DTEK Energy subsidiaries
* Estimated
Source: Company data, Energobiznes, Concorde Capital research
Net revenue, UAH mln EBITDA, UAH mln
1Q16 1Q15 yoy 1Q16 1Q15 yoy 1Q16 1Q15 1Q16 1Q15
Coal mining in Ukraine
Pavlohradvuhillia mmt mined 4.42 4.66 -5% - - - 5,606 4,923 559 696
Other mines mmt mined 2.50 1.64 52% - - - na na na na
Total mmt mined 6.92 6.30 10% - - - - - - -
Power generation & distribution
Dniproenergo TWh output 2.32 2.51 -7% - - - 2,390 1,804 -98 -862
Zakhidenergo TWh output 3.40 4.71 -28% - - - 3,088 3,756 -727 -604
Skhidenergo TWh output 2.45* 2.52 -3% - - - na na na na
Kyivenergo TWh output 1.05 1.12 -6% TWh distr. 2.44 2.40 2% 7,436 6,135 270 327
Donetskoblenergo TWh output 0.06 0.03 76% TWh distr. 1.16 1.68 -31% 1,239 1,193 -217 -792
Dniprooblenergo - - - TWh distr. 5.78 5.54* 4% 6,323 5,330 69 31
Other DisCos - - - TWh distr. 1.86* 2.40* -25% na na na na
Total TWh output 9.27* 10.85 -14% TWh distr. 11.20* 12.01* -7% - - - -
Combined available data 26,083 23,141 -144 -1,204