This document presents an overview of classical Feynman graphs for the Higgs boson. It expands the classical Higgs boson solution perturbatively up to third order in the coupling constant. In the 0th order of this expansion, the first few classical Feynman graphs are constructed. Specifically, it describes how there are five classical graphs looking at terms in the equations of motion involving the W and Z fields coupled to the 0th order Higgs field. It then provides an example of writing one such solution in coordinate space and transforming it to momentum space, depicting the vertex and propagator that would represent it.
NITheP UKZN Seminar: Prof. Alexander Gorokhov (Samara State University, Russi...Rene Kotze
NITheP UKZN Seminar: Prof. Alexander Gorokhov (Samara State University, Russia)
TITLE: Dynamical Groups, Coherent States and Some of their Applications in Quantum Optics and Molecular Spectroscopy
Stochastic Gravity in Conformally-flat SpacetimesRene Kotze
The National Institute for Theoretical Physics, and the Mandelstam Institute for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics, would like to invite to its coming talk in the theoretical physics seminar series, entitled:
"Stochastic Gravity in Conformally-flat Spacetimes"
to be presented by Prof. Hing-Tong Cho (Tamkang University, Taiwan)
Abstract: The theory of stochastic gravity takes into account the effects of quantum field fluctuations onto the classical spacetime. The essential physics can be understood from the analogous Brownian motion model. We shall next concentrate on the case with conformally-flat spacetimes. Our main concern is to derive the so-called noise kernels. We shall also describe our on-going program to investigate the Einstein-Langevin equation in these spacetimes.
Dates: Tuesday, 17th February 2015
Venue: The Frank Nabarro lecture theatre, P216
Time: 13.20 - 14.10 - TODAY
NITheP WITS node Seminar by Dr Dr. Roland Cristopher F. Caballar (NITheP/UKZN)
TITLE: "One-Dimensional Homogeneous Open Quantum Walks"
ABSTRACT: In this talk, we consider a system undergoing an open quantum walk on a one-dimensional lattice. Each jump of the system between adjacent lattice points in a given direction corresponds to a jump operator, with these jump operators either commuting or not commuting. We examine the dynamics of the system undergoing this open quantum walk, in particular deriving analytically the probability distribution of the system, as well as examining numerically the behavior of the probability distribution over long time steps. The resulting distribution is shown to have multiple components, which fall under two general categories, namely normal and solitonic components. The analytic computation of the probability distribution for the system undergoing this open quantum walk allows us to determine at any instant of time the dynamical properties of the system.
Wits Node Seminar: Dr Sunandan Gangopadhyay (NITheP Stellenbosch)
TITLE: Path integral action of a particle in the noncommutative plane and the Aharonov-Bohm effect
NITheP UKZN Seminar: Prof. Alexander Gorokhov (Samara State University, Russi...Rene Kotze
NITheP UKZN Seminar: Prof. Alexander Gorokhov (Samara State University, Russia)
TITLE: Dynamical Groups, Coherent States and Some of their Applications in Quantum Optics and Molecular Spectroscopy
Stochastic Gravity in Conformally-flat SpacetimesRene Kotze
The National Institute for Theoretical Physics, and the Mandelstam Institute for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics, would like to invite to its coming talk in the theoretical physics seminar series, entitled:
"Stochastic Gravity in Conformally-flat Spacetimes"
to be presented by Prof. Hing-Tong Cho (Tamkang University, Taiwan)
Abstract: The theory of stochastic gravity takes into account the effects of quantum field fluctuations onto the classical spacetime. The essential physics can be understood from the analogous Brownian motion model. We shall next concentrate on the case with conformally-flat spacetimes. Our main concern is to derive the so-called noise kernels. We shall also describe our on-going program to investigate the Einstein-Langevin equation in these spacetimes.
Dates: Tuesday, 17th February 2015
Venue: The Frank Nabarro lecture theatre, P216
Time: 13.20 - 14.10 - TODAY
NITheP WITS node Seminar by Dr Dr. Roland Cristopher F. Caballar (NITheP/UKZN)
TITLE: "One-Dimensional Homogeneous Open Quantum Walks"
ABSTRACT: In this talk, we consider a system undergoing an open quantum walk on a one-dimensional lattice. Each jump of the system between adjacent lattice points in a given direction corresponds to a jump operator, with these jump operators either commuting or not commuting. We examine the dynamics of the system undergoing this open quantum walk, in particular deriving analytically the probability distribution of the system, as well as examining numerically the behavior of the probability distribution over long time steps. The resulting distribution is shown to have multiple components, which fall under two general categories, namely normal and solitonic components. The analytic computation of the probability distribution for the system undergoing this open quantum walk allows us to determine at any instant of time the dynamical properties of the system.
Wits Node Seminar: Dr Sunandan Gangopadhyay (NITheP Stellenbosch)
TITLE: Path integral action of a particle in the noncommutative plane and the Aharonov-Bohm effect
Brian Covello: Research in Mathematical Group Representation Theory and SymmetryBrian Covello
Brian Covello's research review on group representation theory and symmetry. In the mathematical field of representation theory, group representations describe abstract groups in terms of linear transformations of vector spaces; in particular, they can be used to represent group elements as matrices so that the group operation can be represented by matrix multiplication. Representations of groups are important because they allow many group-theoretic problems to be reduced to problems in linear algebra, which is well understood. They are also important in physics because, for example, they describe how the symmetry group of a physical system affects the solutions of equations describing that system.
The term representation of a group is also used in a more general sense to mean any "description" of a group as a group of transformations of some mathematical object. More formally, a "representation" means a homomorphism from the group to the automorphism group of an object. If the object is a vector space we have a linear representation. Some people use realization for the general notion and reserve the term representation for the special case of linear representations.
In mathematics, representation theory is a technique for analyzing abstract groups in terms of groups of linear transformations.
For the symmetric groups, a graphical method exists to determine their finite representations that associates with each representation a Young tableau (also known as a Young diagram). The direct product of two representations may easily be decomposed into a direct sum of irreducible representation by a set of rules for the "direct product" of two Young diagrams. Each diagram also contains information about the dimension of the representation to which it corresponds. Young tableaux provide a far cleaner way of working with representations than the algebraic methods that underlie their use.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
1. Basic Higgs Boson Classical Feynman Graphs
Roa, F. J. P.
Abstract
In this expository paper, first few examples of 0th
-Order classical Feynman graphs for the Higgs boson are
presented. The classical Higgs boson solution is expanded perturbatively up to third order in the coupling
constant and in the 0th
-order of this expansion, first few classical Feynman graphs are constructed.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
The Higgs boson η is a component
field in the scalar doublet called the Higgs field
φ . As a doublet the Higgs field transforms
under )1()2( XUSU non-Abelian gauge group
to which belongs the diagonal sub-group for the
scalar doublet. In its structure as a doublet, its
fundamental representation is given by[1]
+
+
=+=
εη
ϕ
β
ϕφφ
i
1
0
0
(1)
which can be considered as a field perturbed
from the ground state represented by the constant
part
=
β
φ
0
0 [2]. Under the diagonal
)1()2( XUSU subgroup,
)1),2exp((
)exp()exp( 3
q
qq
idiag
ii
χ
χσχ
−
=−−
(2)
this scalar doublet’s hypercharge is 1=Y , and
the symmetry under this subgroup, in which the
scalar doublet transforms as
φχσχφ )exp()exp( 3 qq ii −−→ , dictates
that the covariant derivative operator be of the
form
( )
( )
( ) ασ
ασα
α
σσ
µ
µ
µµµµ
sin1
cossin
cos
3
2
3
2
)2(2)1(1
em
AQi
Z
Q
i
WWQiD
+′
+−
′
++′+∂=
(3)
In this form, the transformation
φχσχφ )exp()exp( 3 qq ii −−→ is
accompanied by a gauge transformation
q
emem
eAA χµµµ ∂+→ −1
2 (4)
given that 2/sin eQ =′ α . This gauge
transformation in
em
Aµ will cancel the extra term
picked up in the differentiation
( )φχσχµ )exp()exp( 3 qq iiD −− so as to
render the kinetic term
2
2
1
φµD invariant
under the diagonal subgroup (2). The massive
vector fields µ)1(W and µ)2(W undergo SO(2)
rotations or rather, mixing up of these vector
fields under this particular subgroup, while
em
Aµ
transforms under (4),
q
q
W
WWW
χ
χ
µ
µµµ
2sin
2cos
)2(
)1()1()1( +=′→
(5.1)
and
q
q
W
WWW
χ
χ
µ
µµµ
2cos
2sin
)2(
)1()2()2( +−=′→
(5.2)
This is so since this diagonal subgroup (2) does
not commute with the Pauli matrices 1σ and
2σ . In this particular subgroup of symmetry, the
remaining massive vector field µZ is neutral
under the transformation
φχσχφ )exp()exp( 3 qq ii −−→ .
A basic lagrangian can be constructed
for this scalar doublet that accommodates the
said symmetry under this particular diagonal
subgroup.
( )RLLR
y
VDL
22
2
][
2
1
φψψψφψ
φφµφ
+
−−=
⇓
(6)
In this lagrangian, aside from the Higgs field,
there is also the presence of Dirac fields: the
2. lefthanded spinor doublet
L
ψ and the
righthanded spinor singlet
R
2ψ . These fields
represent the first generation lightweight
fermions. The lefthanded spinor doublet
transforms in the same SU(2)XU(1) diagonal
subgroup although with a different hypercharge
1−=LY , while the righthanded spinor singlet
transforms under a unimodular symmetry
)exp()1( qRR iYU χ−= with a hypercharge
RY . Together
R
qR
R
Yi 22 )exp( ψχψ −→ (7.1)
L
qqL
L
iiY ψχσχψ )exp()exp( 3−−→
(7.2)
along with φχσχφ )exp()exp( 3 qq ii −−→ ,
these transformations will render the Yukawa
coupling
( )RLLR
Y yL 22 φψψψφψ +−= ⇓
(7.3)
invariant provided that the hypercharge
1−= LR YY . It is this Yukawa coupling that
gives masses to these basic lightweight fermions
in their interactions with the Higgs field. This
can be seen by decomposing this coupling term
into a mass term, which gives masses to the said
fermions, and an interaction term that represents
the interaction of the Higgs boson with these first
generation fermions.
( )
22
2222)(
ψψβ
ψψψψβ
y
yL RLLR
massY
−
=+−=
(8.1)
22(int) ψψηyLY −= (8.2)
In both (8.1) and (8.2) we have made use of the
combinations
( ) 2
5
222 1
2
1
ψγψψψ +=LR
( ) 2
5
222 1
2
1
ψγψψψ −=RL
(9)
given the fundamental representation of the
lefthanded spinor doublet
= L
L
L
2
1
ψ
ψ
ψ . In this
column matrix,
L
1ψ is the lefthanded neutrino
which is no longer included in (8.1), so it is
massless. The lefthanded electron
L
2ψ , as well
as the righthanded one
R
2ψ , gains mass through
(8.1). By gauge choice, the other components in
the Higgs field, the Goldstone Bosons ε and 1ϕ
must vanish, 01 == ϕε , leading to (8.2). This
part of the Yukawa coupling says that it is only
the Higgs boson that interacts with the fermion
fields while the Goldstones disappear. With this
gauge choice, the Higgs potential ][φV
simplifies so as to have only the Higgs boson
present and has gained mass in the same way the
fermion fields have acquired masses through
their interactions with the ground or vacuum
state 0φ .
324222
4
1
2
1
][ βηληληφ η ++= mV (10)
Note that in Heaviside units, 1==ch , so in
these units, the Higgs boson mass ηm is
proportional to λβ . The kinetic part
2
2
1
φµD ,
given this gauge choice also simplifies to
( )( )
2
0
2
2)(
)(2
2)(
)(2
2
2
1
cos2
1
cos2
1
2
2
1
2
1
φ
η
α
η
α
β
ηηφ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µµ
D
ZZWWQ
ZZWWQ
D
+
+′
+
+′
+∂∂=
−
+
−
+
(11)
In here, the vector fields W and Z acquire mass
through
2
0
2
1
φµD , also with the interaction
with the vacuum state,
+′= −
+ µ
µ
µ
µµ
α
βφ ZZWWQD 2)(
)(222
0
cos2
1
2
1
(12.1)
βQmW
′∝
Wz mm
αcos
1
=
( )µµµ )2()1(
)(
2
1
WiWW ±=±
(12.2)
To be noted is that the electromagnetic field
em
Aµ decouples from interaction with the vacuum
state that is, 0)1( 03 =+ em
Aµφσ . Thus, this
field does not acquire mass, and interacts only
3. with the Goldstone boson 1ϕ that it eats this
away in the term
em
Aµϕσ )1( 3+ .
2. Higgs boson Lagrangian and the
equations of motion
From the Higgs field lagrangian (6) and
with the gauge choice 01 == ϕε that earlier
led to some simplifications, we pick up the
lagrangian for the Higgs boson
( )
3222
2
2)(
)(2
22
4
1
cos2
1
)(
2
1
)()(
2
1
ηβληλ
η
α
ηηηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µη
−
−+′
+−−∂∂=
−
+
ZZWWQ
xJmL T
(13.1)
in the metric signature -2.
22
2)(
)(2
cos2
1
2)(
ψψ
α
β µ
µ
µ
µ
y
ZZWWQxJT
+
+′−= −
+
(13.2)
The resulting equation of motion is then given by
03
cos2
1
2)(
2232
2)(
)(2
2
=+
+
+′−
++∂∂
−
+
ηβληλ
η
α
ηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
ZZWWQxJ
m
T
(13.3)
We wish to expand the solution in terms of some
coupling constant
2
λ , so perturbatively
∑
∞
=
+=
1
2
0
l
l
l
ηληη (13.4)
and consider up to 3rd
order only in that coupling
constant. With this perturbation, our classical
equation of motion (13.3) can now be resolved
into the following equations of motion
)(
cos2
1
2 02)(
)(2
0
2
0
xJ
ZZWWQ
m
T−
=
+′
−+∂∂
−
+
η
α
ηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
(14.1)
2
0
3
0
12)(
)(2
1
2
1
3
cos2
1
2
ηβη
η
α
ηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
−−
=
+′
−+∂∂
−
+
ZZWWQ
m
(14.2)
101
2
0
22)(
)(2
2
2
2
63
cos2
1
2
ηηβηη
η
α
ηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
−−
=
+′
−+∂∂
−
+
ZZWWQ
m
(14.3)
)2(3)(3
cos2
1
2
20
2
120
2
10
32)(
)(2
3
2
3
ηηηβηηηη
η
α
ηη
µ
µ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
+−+−
=
+′
−+∂∂
−
+
ZZWWQ
m
(14.4)
These in the perturbative expansion
3
6
2
4
1
2
0 ηληληληη +++= (14.5)
3. Classical Feynman graphs in the
0th
order
We proceed to constructing the
Feynman graphs but only in the 0th
order,
corresponding to the solutions of (14.1). Looking
up to (13.2), this source contains three terms plus
those terms in (14.1) involving the fields W and
Z coupled to 0η so, there will be five classical
graphs. We count those terms in (14.1)
containing the W and Z fields that are coupled to
0η as another source in addition to source, TJ .
In coordinate space, we write one
solution to (14.1) as
)()()(
2)(
)2(
1
)(
0)(
)(
2
0
4
210
xxWxW
QxxGxdx
′′′
′′−′=
−
+
∫
η
π
η
µ
µ
(15.1)
To be noticed in here is that the field 0η itself is
part of the source but only existing at a different
location x′ , and 10 )(xη is associated with the
propagator )(0 xxG ′−= .
Through fourier transformation, we can
write (15.1) in momemtum space
4. )exp(
)(~)(
~
)(
~
2
1
)2(
1
)(
3
1
)(
)3(
0
)2(
)(
)1()(2
2
3
1
4)(4
610
σ
σ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
δ
η
π
η
xikkk
kkW
kWQ
imkk
kdkdx
l
l
i
i
−
′
∈++−
=
∑
∫ ∫∏ ∫
=
−
+
=
L
(15.2)
We have already shifted the poles in (15.2) by
including ∈i , which puts causal significance to
the propagator in (15.1). We will note the
symmetry in the delta function that is,
)()( aa −=δδ in writing for the vertex that this
delta function represents in momentum space.
Say for example, 10 )(xη propagates from x′ to
x , where it is given that xx ′>
rr
for
00
xx ′> , and at x′ the sources
)(+
µW ,
)(−
µW
and 0η have emerged that caused the
propagation of the field 10 )(xη from x′ to x .
At x′ and in momentum space the graph looks
like this
In here, all incoming four-momenta are
)1(
k ,
)2(
k and
)3(
k , while )(~
0 kη is outgoing,
carrying the four-momentum k . The vertex is
represented by the delta function
−∑=
3
1
)(
l
l
kkδ , wherein the outgoing four-
momentum is positive while the incoming ones
are negative but since delta functions are
symmetric, we can switch signs between the
incoming and outgoing four-momenta. The delta
function in (15.2) corresponds to a scalar field
propagator in (15.1), written in momentum space
as
∫ ∈++−
′−
=′−
imkk
xxik
kd
xxG
2
4
2
0
))(exp(
)2(
1
)(
η
µ
µ
σσ
σ
π
(15.3)
This is already shifted in poles. One complex
pole is at
2
20
1
2 η
η
mkk
i
mkkkq
+⋅
∈
++⋅≈ rr
rr
to 1st
order in ∈. The upper half contour in the
complex plane encloses this pole and in the limit
0∈→ , this leads to the propagator
∫
′−
′−Θ−
=′−+
0
300 ))(exp(
)(
4
)(
k
xxik
kdxx
i
xxG
σσ
σ
π
r
(15.4)
defined causally for xx ′>
rr
and
00
xx ′> at
20
ηmkkk +⋅=
rr
for a field 10 )(xη that is
traveling forward in time from x′ to x .
Because (15.3) has two poles, one of which leads
to (15.4), our solution (15.1) contains a part that
corresponds to the other pole enclosed by the
lower half contour but we no longer dwell into
this other part in which 10 )(xη travels
backward, from x to x′ although carrying
negative spatial momenta.
The part of the lagrangian (13.1) that
the above graph depicts is given by
2
)(
)(2
ηµ
µ −
+
′ WWQ (15.5)
The next one solution to (14.1) as
represented in coordinate space is
)()()(
cos
)(
)2(
1
)(
0
2
2
0
4
220
xxZxZ
Q
xxGxdx
′′′
′
′−′= ∫
η
απ
η
µ
µ
(16.1)
and in momentum space,
5. )exp(
)(~)(
~
)(
~
cos
1
)2(
1
)(
3
1
)(
)3(
0
)2()1(
2
2
2
3
1
4)(4
620
σ
σ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
δ
η
α
π
η
xikkk
kkZkZ
Q
imkk
kdkdx
l
l
i
i
−
′
∈++−
=
∑
∫ ∫∏ ∫
=
=
L
(16.2)
The interaction involved in this solution is
depicted by the following graph,
The same vertex as in (15.2), where all incoming
four-momenta are
)1(
k ,
)2(
k ,
)3(
k , while k is
the outgoing one carried out by )(~
0 kη as
20 )(xη propagates forward in time from x′ to
x . This causality has the same propagator (15.4)
and all sources µZ , µZ and 0η have emerged
at x′ prior to the arrival of 20 )(xη at some
point x . The part of the Higgs boson lagrangian
depicted in this graph represents the interaction
2
2
2
cos2
η
α
µ
µ ZZ
Q′
(16.3)
The other remaining graphs are those
for the fields contained in the source TJ in its
interaction with the Higgs boson η . This
interaction is included in the Higgs boson
lagrangian and is represented by the term
ηTJ− . We have from this the 3rd
solution
)()(
2)(
)2(
1
)(
)(
)(
2
0
4
230
xWxW
QxxGxdx
′′
′′−′=
−
+
∫
µ
µ
β
π
η
(17.1)
or in momentum space
)exp(
)(
~
)(
~
2
1
)2(
1
)(
2
1
)(
)2(
)(
)1()(
2
2
2
1
4)(4
430
σ
σ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
δ
β
π
η
xikkk
kWkW
Q
imkk
kdkdx
l
l
i
i
−
′
∈++−
=
∑
∫ ∫∏ ∫
=
−
+
=
L
(17.2)
The vertex
−∑=
2
1
)(
l
l
kkδ in (17.2) has two
incoming four-momenta,
)1(
k and
)2(
k , and an
outgoing one k . The causality in this interaction
is given by the propagator (15.4), which also
applies here as it is given the causal order that
30 )(xη propagates from x′ to x . At x′ the
sources
)(+
µW and
)(−
µW have emerged prior to
the arrival of 30 )(xη at some point x . In
momentum space, we can depict this interaction
at x′ by the following graph
The term in ηTJ− that this interaction is
pictured out is
ηβ µ
µ )(
)(2
2 −
+
′ WWQ (17.3)
For the fourth one as contained in
ηTJ− , we have
)()(
cos
)(
)2(
1
)( 2
2
0
4
240
xZxZ
Q
xxGxdx
′′
′
′−′= ∫
µ
µ
α
β
π
η
(18.1)
as also in momentum space
6. )exp(
)(
~
)(
~
cos
1
)2(
1
)(
2
1
)(
)2()1(
2
2
2
2
1
4)(4
440
σ
σ
µ
µ
η
µ
µ
δ
α
β
π
η
xikkk
kZkZ
Q
imkk
kdkdx
l
l
i
i
−
′
∈++−
=
∑
∫ ∫∏ ∫
=
=
L
(18.2)
This depicts the interaction drawn on the
Feynman graph
Corresponding to the term in ηL that is given by
η
α
β µ
µ ZZ
Q
2
2
cos
′
(18.3)
The fifth remaining one in this 0th
order
solution involves the interaction between two
first generation lightweight fermions from which
interaction the Higgs boson arises
In coordinate space this is given by
)()(
)()(
)2(
1
)(
22
0
4
250
xx
yxxGxdx
′′
−′−′= ∫
ψψ
π
η
(19.1)
while in momentum space
)exp(
)(~)(
~
)(
1
)2(
1
)(
2
1
)(
)2(
2
)1(
2
2
2
1
4)(4
450
σ
σ
η
µ
µ
δ
ψψ
π
η
xikkk
kk
y
imkk
kdkdx
l
l
i
i
−
−
∈++−
=
∑
∫ ∫∏ ∫
=
=
L
(19.2)
In ηL , this is the term given by
ηψψ 22y− (19.3)
(stopped: pp. 19, draft)
Ref’s
[1]W. Hollik, Quantum field theory and the
Standard Model, arXiv:1012.3883v1 [hep-ph]
[2]Baal, P., A COURSE IN FIELD THEORY,
http://www.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/~vanbaal/FTco
urse.html
’t Hooft, G., THE CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY,
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/
Siegel, W., FIELDS, arXiv:hep-th/9912205 v2
Wells, J. D., Lectures on Higgs Boson Physics
in the Standard Model and Beyond,
arXiv:0909.4541v1
Dittmar, M., Searching for the Higgs and other
Exotic Objects (A “How to” Guide from LEP to
the LHC), arXiv:hep-ex/9901009v1
Cardy, J., Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
Gaberdiel, M., Gehrmann-De Ridder, A.,
Quantum Field Theory II