This document outlines a presentation on thermodynamics of anti-de Sitter black holes as regularized fidelity susceptibility. It introduces concepts like entanglement entropy, the holographic principle, and holographic entanglement entropy. It then discusses fidelity susceptibility and holographic complexity. The document derives formulas for these quantities for Reissner-Nordström anti-de Sitter black holes. Specifically, it derives an expression for the difference in entanglement entropy between the pure background and metric deformation. It also computes the holographic complexity and fidelity susceptibility volumes for RN black holes through integrals involving the metric function.
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in CosmologySEENET-MTP
Lecture by Prof. Dr. Dimitar Mladenov (Theoretical Physics Department, Faculty of Physics, Sofia University, Bulgaria) on December 7, 2011 at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Nis, Serbia.
D. Mladenov - On Integrable Systems in CosmologySEENET-MTP
Lecture by Prof. Dr. Dimitar Mladenov (Theoretical Physics Department, Faculty of Physics, Sofia University, Bulgaria) on December 7, 2011 at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Nis, Serbia.
Lecture by prof. dr Neven Bilic from the Ruđer Bošković Institute (Zagreb, Croatia) at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics (Niš, Serbia) on October 29, 2014.
The visit took place in the frame of the ICTP – SEENET-MTP project PRJ-09 “Cosmology and Strings”.
First-order cosmological perturbations produced by point-like masses: all sca...Maxim Eingorn
This presentation based on the paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03835 was made at Institute of Cosmology, Tufts University, on November 12, 2015. The abstract follows:
In the framework of the concordance cosmological model the first-order scalar and vector perturbations of the homogeneous background are derived without any supplementary approximations in addition to the weak gravitational field limit. The sources of these perturbations (inhomogeneities) are presented in the discrete form of a system of separate point-like gravitating masses. The obtained expressions for the metric corrections are valid at all (sub-horizon and super-horizon) scales and converge in all points except the locations of the sources, and their average values are zero (thus, first-order backreaction effects are absent). Both the Minkowski background limit and the Newtonian cosmological approximation are reached under certain well-defined conditions. An important feature of the velocity-independent part of the scalar perturbation is revealed: up to an additive constant it represents a sum of Yukawa potentials produced by inhomogeneities with the same finite time-dependent Yukawa interaction range. The suggesting itself connection between this range and the homogeneity scale is briefly discussed along with other possible physical implications.
ALL-SCALE cosmological perturbations and SCREENING OF GRAVITY in inhomogeneou...Maxim Eingorn
M. Eingorn, First-order cosmological perturbations engendered by point-like masses, ApJ 825 (2016) 84: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/84
In the framework of the concordance cosmological model, the first-order scalar and vector perturbations of the homogeneous background are derived in the weak gravitational field limit without any supplementary approximations. The sources of these perturbations (inhomogeneities) are presented in the discrete form of a system of separate point-like gravitating masses. The expressions found for the metric corrections are valid at all (sub-horizon and super-horizon) scales and converge at all points except at the locations of the sources. The average values of these metric corrections are zero (thus, first-order backreaction effects are absent). Both the Minkowski background limit and the Newtonian cosmological approximation are reached under certain well-defined conditions. An important feature of the velocity-independent part of the scalar perturbation is revealed: up to an additive constant, this part represents a sum of Yukawa potentials produced by inhomogeneities with the same finite time-dependent Yukawa interaction range. The suggested connection between this range and the homogeneity scale is briefly discussed along with other possible physical implications.
Neutral Electronic Excitations: a Many-body approach to the optical absorptio...Claudio Attaccalite
Neutral Electronic Excitations: a Many-body approach to the optical absorption spectra.
Introduction to Bethe-Salpeter equation and linear response theory.
In this second lecture, I will discuss how to calculate polarization in terms of Berry phase, how to include GW correction in the real-time dynamics and electron-hole interaction.
Lecture by prof. dr Neven Bilic from the Ruđer Bošković Institute (Zagreb, Croatia) at the Faculty of Science and Mathematics (Niš, Serbia) on October 29, 2014.
The visit took place in the frame of the ICTP – SEENET-MTP project PRJ-09 “Cosmology and Strings”.
First-order cosmological perturbations produced by point-like masses: all sca...Maxim Eingorn
This presentation based on the paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03835 was made at Institute of Cosmology, Tufts University, on November 12, 2015. The abstract follows:
In the framework of the concordance cosmological model the first-order scalar and vector perturbations of the homogeneous background are derived without any supplementary approximations in addition to the weak gravitational field limit. The sources of these perturbations (inhomogeneities) are presented in the discrete form of a system of separate point-like gravitating masses. The obtained expressions for the metric corrections are valid at all (sub-horizon and super-horizon) scales and converge in all points except the locations of the sources, and their average values are zero (thus, first-order backreaction effects are absent). Both the Minkowski background limit and the Newtonian cosmological approximation are reached under certain well-defined conditions. An important feature of the velocity-independent part of the scalar perturbation is revealed: up to an additive constant it represents a sum of Yukawa potentials produced by inhomogeneities with the same finite time-dependent Yukawa interaction range. The suggesting itself connection between this range and the homogeneity scale is briefly discussed along with other possible physical implications.
ALL-SCALE cosmological perturbations and SCREENING OF GRAVITY in inhomogeneou...Maxim Eingorn
M. Eingorn, First-order cosmological perturbations engendered by point-like masses, ApJ 825 (2016) 84: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/84
In the framework of the concordance cosmological model, the first-order scalar and vector perturbations of the homogeneous background are derived in the weak gravitational field limit without any supplementary approximations. The sources of these perturbations (inhomogeneities) are presented in the discrete form of a system of separate point-like gravitating masses. The expressions found for the metric corrections are valid at all (sub-horizon and super-horizon) scales and converge at all points except at the locations of the sources. The average values of these metric corrections are zero (thus, first-order backreaction effects are absent). Both the Minkowski background limit and the Newtonian cosmological approximation are reached under certain well-defined conditions. An important feature of the velocity-independent part of the scalar perturbation is revealed: up to an additive constant, this part represents a sum of Yukawa potentials produced by inhomogeneities with the same finite time-dependent Yukawa interaction range. The suggested connection between this range and the homogeneity scale is briefly discussed along with other possible physical implications.
Neutral Electronic Excitations: a Many-body approach to the optical absorptio...Claudio Attaccalite
Neutral Electronic Excitations: a Many-body approach to the optical absorption spectra.
Introduction to Bethe-Salpeter equation and linear response theory.
In this second lecture, I will discuss how to calculate polarization in terms of Berry phase, how to include GW correction in the real-time dynamics and electron-hole interaction.
The paper reports on an iteration algorithm to compute asymptotic solutions at any order for a wide class of nonlinear
singularly perturbed difference equations.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
1. Thermodynamics of AdS Black Holes as
Regularized Fidelity Susceptibility
Aizhan Myrzakul
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Eurasian International Center for Theoretical Physics
Nazarbayev University
ECL17: Exploring the Energetic Universe
August 7, 2017
1 / 1
3. 1.1. Entanglement Entropy
Let us consider two systems, with corresponding Hilbert spaces H1 and H2 respectively.
The Hilbert space of the combined system is then H1 ⊗ H2. A state of this combined
system is said to be entangled if it cannot be written in the form
|Ψ⟩ = |ψ1⟩ ⊗ |ψ2⟩ (1)
E.g. assume we have two particles, each of which can have one of two states. This is
called a qubit. Then the state
|Ψ⟩ =|↑⟩⊗ |↓⟩ (2)
is not entangled. In contrast, the state
|Ψ⟩ =
1
√
2
(|↑⟩⊗ |↓⟩− |↓⟩⊗ |↑⟩) (3)
is entangled. In fact, this entangled state is usually known as an EPR pair.
3 / 1
4. 1.1. Entanglement Entropy
The expectation value of any operator A is given by
⟨A⟩ = ∑pi ⟨ψi |A|ψi ⟩ (4)
Such a state is described by an operator known as the density matrix
ρ = ∑pi |ψi ⟩⟨ψi | (5)
The expectation value (4) of any operator can now be written simply as
⟨A⟩ = Tr(ρA) (6)
where the trace is over all states in the Hilbert space. If we know for sure that the system
is described by a specific state |ψ⟩, then the density matrix is simply the projection
operator
ρ = |ψ⟩⟨ψ| (7)
In this case, we say that we have a pure state.
4 / 1
5. 1.1. Entanglement Entropy
Given a classical probability distribution {pi }, the entropy is defined by
S = − ∑pi log pi (8)
In information theory, this is called the Shannon entropy. In physics, this quantity is
usually multiplied by the Boltzmann constant kB and is called the Gibbs entropy. The
entropy is a measure of the uncertainty encoded in the probability distribution. For a
quantum state described by a density matrix ρ, the entropy is defined to be
S(ρ) = −Tr(ρ log ρ) (9)
This is the von Neumann entropy. If we are dealing with a reduced density matrix
ρA = TrB ρ (10)
then
SA = −TrA(ρAlnρA) (11)
is referred to as the entanglement entropy.
5 / 1
6. 1.2 Holographic Principle
The information hidden inside BHs is measured by the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole
entropy
SBH =
Area(Horizon)
4GN
(12)
This consideration leads to the idea of entropy bound
SA ≤
Area(∂A)
4GN
(13)
where SA-the entropy in a region A. Consequently, the d.o.f in gravity are proportional
to the area instead of the volume.
[t’Hooft 1993, Susskind 1994]:
(d+2)-dim gravity theory ⇐⇒ (d+1)-dim non-gravity theory (QFT, CFT, etc.)
[Maldacena 1997]:
Gravity in AdSd+2 = CFT in Rd+1
6 / 1
7. 1.3 Holographic Entanglement Entropy
Proposed by Ryu-Takayanagi (2006), the formula for holographic entanglement entropy
is
SA =
Area(γmin)
4G
(14)
where A(γmin) is an area of a subsystem enclosed by the minimal surface γmin, ∂γ = ∂A,
in the bulk measured in Planck scale, G - gravitational constant.
7 / 1
8. 1.4 Fidelity Susceptibility
The fidelity sisceptibility which corresponds to the maximal volume of the bulk [Susskind
2013, Alishahiha 2015] is
χF =
V (γmax )
8πRG
(15)
Consider N-body quantum system with Hamiltonian
H0 = ∑Hi = ∑Hi (
p2
i
2m
+ Vi ) + ∑Vij (16)
which corresponds to the system consisting of pure states |ψ(λ)⟩. If we add an external
field, e.g. magnetic field, to this system, i.e. infinitesimally transform parameter λ →
λ + δλ, then the Hamiltonian for perturbed system |ψ(λ + δλ)⟩ is
H ∼= H0 + λH1 (17)
where |λH1| ≪ |H0|.
8 / 1
9. 1.4 Fidelity Susceptibility
The inner product between these two wave functions gives the fidelity χF
⟨ψ(λ)|ψ(λ + δλ)⟩ = 1 − Gλλ(δλ)2
+ O((δλ)3
) (18)
This metric measures the distance between two infinitesimally different states. Gλλ is
also called the fidelity susceptibility. When a d + 1-dimensional CFT is deformed by an
exactly marginal perturbation, parametrized by λ, Gλλ is holographically estimated by
Gλλ = nd ·
Vol(∑max )
Rd+1
(19)
where nd is an O(1) constant and R is the AdS radius. The d+1 dimensional space-like
surface ∑max is the time slice with the maximal volume in the AdS which ends on the
time slice at the AdS boundary(ies). Fidelity measures how much |ψ(λ)⟩ is overlapped
to |ψ(λ + δλ)⟩.
9 / 1
10. 1.5 Holographic Complexity
Following [Susskind, 2013], the formula for holographic complexity is
CA =
V (γmin)
8πRG
(20)
where R and V are the radius of the curvature and volume in the bulk, 8π was added
for normalization convention. So, the holographic complexity measures the difficulty of
connecting two different states.
10 / 1
11. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
The metric for RNAdS is given by
ds2
= −f (r)dt2
+ dr2
f (r) + r2
dΩ2
(21)
with the function f being
f = 1 +
r2
l2
−
ϵr3
+
rl2
+
δr4
+
r2l2
(22)
where ϵ and δ are defined as
2Ml2
r3
+
= ϵ ,
Q2l2
r4
+
= δ . (23)
Here, we also have that |Q| < l/6 and correspondingly δ < l2/(6r2
+). Let us start to
compute extremal surfaces using the area functional. The area functional for a specific
entangled region of the boundary in RNAdS is then given by
Area =
∫ 2π
0
dϕ
∫ θ0
0
L(θ)dθ (24)
where L(θ) now is
L(θ) = r sin θ r2 +
( dr
dθ )2
1 + r2
l2 −
ϵr3
+
rl2 +
δr4
+
r2l2
(25)
11 / 1
12. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
The Euler-Lagrange equation corresponding to the above L(θ) is
d2r
dθ2
=
1
−2r2 sin (θ) l2ϵr3
+ + 2r sin (θ) l2δr4
+ + 2r5 sin (θ) l2 + 2r3 sin (θ) l4
×
× [4 sin (θ) r8
+ 8 sin (θ) l2
r6
− 8r5
sin (θ) ϵr3
+ − 2r5
cos (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)
l2
+ 4r4
sin (θ) l4
+
+ 8r4
sin (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)2
l2
+ 8r4
sin (θ) δr4
+ − 2r3
cos (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)
l4
−
− 8r3
sin (θ) l2
ϵh3
+ 2r2
cos (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)
l2
ϵr3
+ + 4r2
sin (θ) ϵ2
r6
++
+ 6r2
sin (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)2
l4
+ 8r2
sin (θ) l2
δr4
+ − 5r sin (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)2
l2
ϵr3
+−
− 2r (θ) cos (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)
l2
δr4
+ − 8r sin (θ) ϵr7
+δ − 2r cos (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)3
l4
+
+ 4 sin (θ) δ2
r8
+ + 4 sin (θ)
(
dr
dθ
)2
l2
δr4
+]. (26)
12 / 1
13. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
We can solve this equation by expanding in series of θ. We set here the AdS radius
l = 1
r (θ) = ρ +
1
2
(
−ρϵr3
+ + δr4
+ + ρ4 + ρ2
)
θ2
ρ
+
1
96ρ2
[(
9ρϵ2
r6
+ − 9ϵh7
δ − 45ρ4
ϵ r3
+−
− 29ρ2
ϵr3
+ + 36ρ3
δr4
+ + 20ρδr4
+ + 36ρ7
+ 56ρ5
+ 20ρ3
)
θ4
]
+ O
(
θ6
)
. (27)
then again expanding it in δ up to second order, we find that the finite part of the
entanglement entropy. This part is the difference between the pure background and the
AdS deformation of the metric. Doing that, we find
∆S = −
1440ρ
4G
× [θ2
0(675 θ4
0r3
+ϵ ρ4
+ 540 θ2
0r3
+ϵ ρ2
+ 375 θ4
0r7
+ϵ δ + 495 θ4
0r3
+ϵ ρ2
−450 θ4
0ρ7
− 272 θ4
0ρ3
− 720 θ4
0ρ5
− 540 ρ5
θ2
0 − 480 ρ3
θ2
0 − 420 θ4
0ρ δ r4
+
−600 θ4
0ρ3
δ r4
+ − 720 ρ3
− 540 ρ θ2
0δ r4
+)]−1
. (28)
13 / 1
15. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Let us know compute the holographic complexity and fidelity susceptibility dual volumes
for a RN black hole. These quantities can be written as follows
Vc = 2π
∫ θ0
0
sin θdθ
∫ r(θ)
r+
r2dr
√
f
, (31)
VFid = 2π
∫ 2π
0
sin θdθ
∫ r∞
r+
r2dr
√
f
. (32)
Now, by expanding the integrand r2/
√
f in Taylor series up to linear terms in ϵ and θ,
we obtain
r2
√
1 + r2
l2 −
ϵr3
+
rl2 +
δr4
+
r2l2
= −
1
4
lr3
+
(
−2r2ϵl2 − 2r4ϵ + 2r+δrl2 + 2r+δr3 + 3r4
+δϵ
)
r (l2 + r2)5/2
.(33)
15 / 1
16. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Hence, the volume corrsponding to the holographic complexity of the RN black hole
becomes
Vc = −
∫ θ0
0
sin θdθ
( 1
2
r3
+ϵr2
(1 + r2)3/2
+
1
2
r3
+ϵ
(1 + r2)3/2
+
1
2
δr4
+r
√
1 + r2
+
1
4
ϵr7
+δ
(1 + r2)3/2
+
3
4
ϵr7
+δ
√
1 + r2
−
3
4
ϵr7
+δ ln
[
2 + 2
√
1 + r2
r
]
) r(θ)
r+
. (34)
After computing this integral and expanding up to sixth order in θ and by taking asymp-
totic expansion in ρ we find the following compacted expression
Vc = −
1
48
(
−6 θ2
0ϵ br2
+ − 6 θ2
0ϵ b
)
θ2
0r3
+π ρ
b3
−
1
48b3
×
[
− 3 θ2
0r6
+δ bϵ ln
(
1 + b
r+
)
+ 2 θ2
0r4
+δ + 4 θ2
0r3
+δ b − 48 r4
+δ ϵ − 24 r4
+δ
+2 θ2
0ϵ r2
+ + 4 θ2
0r+δ b + 24 r+δ b − 3 θ2
0r4
+δ bϵ ln
(
1 + b
r+
)
+ 2 θ2
0r2
+δ + 4 θ2
0r4
+δ ϵ
−24 ϵ + 2 θ2
0ϵ − 24 ϵ r2
+ + 24 r3
+δ b − 36 r6
+δ ϵ + 36 r4
+δ ϵ b ln
(
1 + b
r+
)
− 24 r2
+δ
+36 r6
+δ ϵ b ln
(
1 + b
r+
)
+ 3 θ2
0r6
+δ ϵ
]
θ2
0r3
+π , (35)
where a =
√
1 + ρ2 and b =
√
1 + r2
+.
16 / 1
17. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
The mass, temperature and complexity pressure of the RN black hole are defined as
follows
M =
r+
2
(
1 +
r2
+
l2
+
Q2
r2
+
)
(36)
T =
1
4π
(
3r4
+ + r2
+ − Q2
r3
+
)
(37)
P = −
∂M
∂VFid
= −
∂M
∂r+
∂VFid
∂r+
(38)
The explicit expression for the complexity pressure is very long for the space-time stud-
ied. Now, we need to express the complexity pressure and volume in terms of the
temperature. In order to do that, we need to solve (??) for r+. Thus, we need to solve
the following equation
r4
+ −
4πT
3
r3
+ +
r2
+
3
−
Q2
3
= 0 (39)
The roots of this equation are given by
x1,2 = −
˜b
4˜a
− S ±
1
2
√
−4S2 − 2p +
q
S
x3,4 = −
˜b
4˜a
+ S ±
1
2
√
−4S2 − 2p +
q
S
(40)
17 / 1
18. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
where p, q and S are defined by
p =
8˜a˜c − 3˜b2
8˜a2
, q =
˜b3 − 4˜a˜b + 8˜a2 ˜d
8˜a3
,
S =
1
6
√
−6 + 3G + 3
∆0
G
, G =
3
√
1
2
∆1 +
1
2
√
∆2
1 − 4∆3
0 ,
∆0 = ˜c2
− 3˜b ˜d + 12˜a˜e , ∆1 = 2˜c3
− 9˜b˜c ˜d + 27˜b2
˜e + 27˜a ˜d2
− 72˜a˜c ˜e ,(41)
and ∆ determined as
∆2
1 − 4∆3
0 = −27∆ (42)
is a determinant of the fourth order polynomial. If ∆ > 0, then all four roots of the
equation are either real or complex.
18 / 1
19. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
From (39), we have that ˜a = 1, ˜b = −(4πT)/3, ˜c = 1/3, ˜d = 0 and ˜e = −Q2/3.
Therefore, for our case the roots are given by
r1,2
+ =
1
3
π T −
1
6
√
−6 + 3
3
√
k + 3
1
9 − 4 Q2
3
√
k
±
1
6
−3
3
√
k − 3
1
9 − 4 Q2
3
√
k
+ 12 π2T2 +
54
(
− 8
27 π3T3 + 2
3 π T
)
√
−6 + 3
3
√
k + 3 1/9−4 Q2
3√
k
(43)
r3,4
+ =
1
3
π T −
1
6
√
−6 + 3
3
√
k + 3
1
9 − 4 Q2
3
√
k
±
1
6
−3
3
√
k − 3
1
9 − 4 Q2
3
√
k
+ 12 π2T2 +
54
(
− 8
27 π3T3 + 2
3 π T
)
√
−6 + 3
3
√
k + 3 1/9−4 Q2
3√
k
(44)
where
k =
1
27
− 8 π2
T2
Q2
+ 4 Q2
+
1
2
√(
2
27
− 16 π2T2Q2 + 8 Q2
)2
− 4
(
1
9
− 4 Q2
)3
.
(45)
19 / 1
20. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Since k must be real, the inequality
(
2
27
− 16 π2
T2
Q2
+ 8 Q2
)2
− 4
(
1
9
− 4 Q2
)3
≥ 0 (46)
must hold. Equivalently, the above inequality can be expressed as
T ≤
1
4Qπ
−
(
2
(
1
9
− 4 Q2
)3/2
−
2
27
− 8 Q2
)
. (47)
Now, by taking series in Q up to order 6 in the above equation, we find
T ≤
1
2
√
3
π
−
3
4
√
3Q2
π
−
81
16
√
3Q4
π
+ O
(
Q6
)
, (48)
or
T ≤ 0.27567 − 0.41350 Q2
− 2.7912 Q4
+ O
(
Q6
)
. (49)
From this expression, we can note that the temperature will be maximum
when Q = 0.
20 / 1
21. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Figure 1 : T as a function of Q . This graph is confined with the condition
|Q| < l
6 .
21 / 1
22. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Let us now find the horizon of RNAdS black hole. To do that, we need to rewrite (??)
using (??), which gives us
f (r) = 1 +
r2
l2
−
2M
r
+
Q2
r2
(50)
Now, the horizon condition f (r) = 0 can be written as
ξ4
+ ξ2
−
2M
l
ξ +
(
Q
l
)2
= 0 (51)
where ξ = r/l. Here our aim is to find the largest root of the above equation which
will correspond to the outer horizon of the RN charged black hole. The largest root is
given by
ξ3 = 1
6
(
−6 + 3k + 3 1+12Q2
k
)1/2
+ 1
6
√
−12 − 3m − 3(1+12Q2)
m − 108M√
−6+3m+3 1+12Q2
m
(52)
where m =
(
1 + 54 M2 + 6
√
3 M2 + 81 M4 − Q2 − 12 Q4 − 48 Q6
)1/3
[Momeni, Myrza-
kul and et.al. 2016].
22 / 1
23. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
a) b) c)
Figure 2 : Location of the roots ξ1, ξ2 ξ3 for the RN black hole as a function
of Q, M.
23 / 1
24. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Figure 3 : Figure showing a P-V diagram for the thermodynamic volume
V = 4
3 πr3
+ and pressure P = 3
8πl2 for RNSAdS black holes.
24 / 1
25. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Figure 4 : Figure showing a P-V diagrams for fidelity versus pressure. For
various temperatures of RNSAdS black holes, indicating that fidelity does,
indeed, represent the thermodynamic volume.
25 / 1
26. 2. Reissner-Nordstr¨om Anti-de Sitter black holes
Figure 5 : A P-V diagram between holographic complexity and pressure,
showing a totally different behaviour than the thermodynamic P-V diagram.
26 / 1
27. 3 Conclusion
Future problems
1. HEE for non-AdS spacetimes?
2. What is an analogue of the Einstein eq. for HEE?
3. A new formulation of QG in terms of Quantum Entanglement
27 / 1
28. 4 References
1. t’ Hooft G, DIMENSIONAL REDUCTION in QUANTUM GRAVITY. [arxiv: 9310026].
2. Susskind L, The World as a Hologram, [arxiv: 9409089]
3. Maldacena J, he Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int.
J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)].
4. Ryu S. and Takayanagi T, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from
AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
5. Susskind L, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, [hep-th/1402.5674],[hep-
th/1403.5695].
6. Alishahiha M, Holographic Complexity, Phys. Rev. D 92, 126009 (2015).
7. Momeni D, Myrzakul A, Myrzakulov R, Faizal M, Alsaleh S, Alasfar L Thermody-
namics of AdS Black Holes as Regularized Fidelity Susceptibility. [arXiv:1704.05785].
28 / 1