This document provides an overview of Virginia's capital outlay funding processes. It discusses the evolution of capital funding, the capital budget development process, the capital pool process, equipment funding requests, non-pool projects, maintenance reserve eligibility, capital leases, emergency projects, and ESCO projects. The capital pool process involves agencies submitting capital budget requests, BCOM reviewing costs, and the governor and legislature approving funding. Other types of capital projects like equipment and non-pool projects follow different processes.
This document discusses project costs, budgeting, and appraisal. It defines key terms like project costs, classifications of costs, and budgeting. It explains methods for forecasting, budgeting, and appraising projects. Project appraisal techniques like payback period, accounting rate of return, and net present value are explained in detail. Factors that affect project costs and the importance of project cost management are also discussed.
DHSEM Presentation to Local Officials and Staff for Flood RecoveryTrost, Micki
This document summarizes a presentation given by the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) to elected officials and staff. It provided an overview of DHSEM's mitigation and recovery programs, staffing, the Public Assistance program lifecycle and roles, reimbursements, and other grants programs. DHSEM is hiring additional staff and contractors to manage increased workload from recent disasters, and working to expedite scope change requests and reimbursements to subgrantees. The document reviewed the status of several grants programs, including Community Development Block Grant disaster recovery, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
This document provides an agenda and background information for a breakout session on the developer and CfD lifecycles for onshore wind and solar projects between 10-15 MW. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle by technology, and discussing key issues across pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning. It also presents DECC's current thinking on aspects of the CfD process like budget allocation, application mechanisms, reaching substantial financial commitment, target commissioning windows and long-stop dates. Feedback is sought from developers on making the CfD policy map appropriately to technology lifecycles and on specific policy design questions.
Capitalism has a long history of boom and bust, we have to continue to learn by every crisis. Two key problems arose especial in Mega Developments in the region with the soft economy and mix use / market shift, the first being most developments are designed for continuous construction rather than phased and the second most master plans could not be phased efficiently with sustainability issues pushes to the forefront. The Presentation focuses on Developers dilemmas and lessons learned and highlight some of the solutions including cost share and cost recovery mechanisms adopted through a project case study.
This document outlines the agenda and key topics for a breakout session on mapping the developer and CfD lifecycles for onshore wind projects over 50MW. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle, pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning stages. It also discusses how CfD policy relates to the different stages, including issues like strike price visibility, budget allocation, application processes, and potential allocation mechanisms like first-come-first-served and constrained allocation rounds. Feedback from developers is sought on how well CfD policy maps to the onshore wind lifecycle.
This document outlines the agenda and key topics for a breakout session on mapping the developer and CfD lifecycles for marine and tidal technologies. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle by technology, pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning stages. Key CfD issues like strike price visibility, budget allocation, substantial financial commitment, target commissioning windows and long-stop dates are discussed across the different stages. Feedback is solicited from participants on how well the CfD policy maps to developer lifecycles and where improvements could be made.
This document discusses the types of cost and schedule reports that NASA is required to submit to oversight bodies like Congress, OMB, and GAO. It outlines three main types of reports: [1] Baseline Reports that establish cost and schedule commitments, [2] Current Estimate Reports that provide updates, and [3] Threshold Reports required when growth thresholds are exceeded. It provides details on the timing, recipients, and required contents of each report. The document is intended to explain NASA's external reporting processes and requirements to project managers.
Paul Kruger has overseen the development of 3 affordable housing projects totaling 281 units and $72 million. As an affordable housing consultant, he performs feasibility assessments, secures financing and approvals, and manages the development process. Some of his responsibilities include assessing market demand, securing low-income housing tax credits, negotiating partnerships, and developing tenant relocation plans. He has successfully redeveloped several occupied properties in New York through preservation programs.
This document discusses project costs, budgeting, and appraisal. It defines key terms like project costs, classifications of costs, and budgeting. It explains methods for forecasting, budgeting, and appraising projects. Project appraisal techniques like payback period, accounting rate of return, and net present value are explained in detail. Factors that affect project costs and the importance of project cost management are also discussed.
DHSEM Presentation to Local Officials and Staff for Flood RecoveryTrost, Micki
This document summarizes a presentation given by the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) to elected officials and staff. It provided an overview of DHSEM's mitigation and recovery programs, staffing, the Public Assistance program lifecycle and roles, reimbursements, and other grants programs. DHSEM is hiring additional staff and contractors to manage increased workload from recent disasters, and working to expedite scope change requests and reimbursements to subgrantees. The document reviewed the status of several grants programs, including Community Development Block Grant disaster recovery, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
This document provides an agenda and background information for a breakout session on the developer and CfD lifecycles for onshore wind and solar projects between 10-15 MW. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle by technology, and discussing key issues across pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning. It also presents DECC's current thinking on aspects of the CfD process like budget allocation, application mechanisms, reaching substantial financial commitment, target commissioning windows and long-stop dates. Feedback is sought from developers on making the CfD policy map appropriately to technology lifecycles and on specific policy design questions.
Capitalism has a long history of boom and bust, we have to continue to learn by every crisis. Two key problems arose especial in Mega Developments in the region with the soft economy and mix use / market shift, the first being most developments are designed for continuous construction rather than phased and the second most master plans could not be phased efficiently with sustainability issues pushes to the forefront. The Presentation focuses on Developers dilemmas and lessons learned and highlight some of the solutions including cost share and cost recovery mechanisms adopted through a project case study.
This document outlines the agenda and key topics for a breakout session on mapping the developer and CfD lifecycles for onshore wind projects over 50MW. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle, pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning stages. It also discusses how CfD policy relates to the different stages, including issues like strike price visibility, budget allocation, application processes, and potential allocation mechanisms like first-come-first-served and constrained allocation rounds. Feedback from developers is sought on how well CfD policy maps to the onshore wind lifecycle.
This document outlines the agenda and key topics for a breakout session on mapping the developer and CfD lifecycles for marine and tidal technologies. The agenda covers introducing the developer lifecycle by technology, pre-development, development, financing, construction and commissioning stages. Key CfD issues like strike price visibility, budget allocation, substantial financial commitment, target commissioning windows and long-stop dates are discussed across the different stages. Feedback is solicited from participants on how well the CfD policy maps to developer lifecycles and where improvements could be made.
This document discusses the types of cost and schedule reports that NASA is required to submit to oversight bodies like Congress, OMB, and GAO. It outlines three main types of reports: [1] Baseline Reports that establish cost and schedule commitments, [2] Current Estimate Reports that provide updates, and [3] Threshold Reports required when growth thresholds are exceeded. It provides details on the timing, recipients, and required contents of each report. The document is intended to explain NASA's external reporting processes and requirements to project managers.
Paul Kruger has overseen the development of 3 affordable housing projects totaling 281 units and $72 million. As an affordable housing consultant, he performs feasibility assessments, secures financing and approvals, and manages the development process. Some of his responsibilities include assessing market demand, securing low-income housing tax credits, negotiating partnerships, and developing tenant relocation plans. He has successfully redeveloped several occupied properties in New York through preservation programs.
This document provides an overview of capital budgeting techniques that will be covered in a Principles of Finance course. It discusses the key steps in the capital budgeting process, including proposal generation, review and analysis, decision making, implementation, and follow-up. Basic terminology like independent vs mutually exclusive projects, unlimited funds vs capital rationing, and accept-reject vs ranking approaches are defined. Specific capital budgeting techniques like payback period and average accounting return are explained, with examples provided to illustrate how to calculate them and use them to evaluate potential capital expenditure projects.
This workshop will explore how organizations can utilize various federal, state, and private financing sources combined with innovative ideas to create affordable rural rental housing for veterans, seniors, and families. Participants will learn to analyze project cash flow, maximize private investment, leverage tax credits, and bridge financing gaps.
The Role of the Business Case in Public Investment Management and Project Por...Dr Rupert Booth
The document outlines Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Management (PIM) framework and Project Portfolio Planning (PPP) process. It introduces the Five Case Model business case approach used in PPP. The model assesses the strategic, economic, commercial, financial, and management cases for projects. It then discusses each step of Saudi Arabia's PPP process in detail, including screening projects using a strategic assessment, risk assessment, and strategic outline case with cost-benefit analysis. The best projects are prioritized to create a five-year project portfolio plan. Project execution is supported by a stage gate process and standardized 'White Book' procedures.
NASA is required to regularly report cost and schedule performance data to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for its major projects. The types of reports include baseline reports, current estimate reports, threshold reports if growth exceeds certain levels, and rebaseline reports if costs grow by 30% or more. NASA manages this reporting by linking it to agency policies and using a single standardized data tracking system to provide consistent information across all reports on project-managed costs, unfunded enhancements held by program offices, and other agency-managed costs.
This document discusses cash flow management for large infrastructure projects in India. It notes that infrastructure projects require huge capital investments but often face delays and cost overruns. An effective cash flow management model is needed to precisely predict capital outflows and optimize the use of funds over time. The document proposes a mathematical model for rolling, flexible cash flow management that provides a practical solution to minimize capital costs and optimize cash flows on a monthly basis.
This document summarizes the key requirements under 24 CFR §92.250 (b)(2) for assessing applications for HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding. It outlines the "Big Four" criteria that must be addressed: (1) an assessment of current market demand; (2) the experience of the developer; (3) the financial capacity of the developer; and (4) firm written financial commitments for the project. It provides guidance on how to demonstrate each of these criteria, including through statistical data, financial statements and ratios, and fully executed commitment letters. Addressing these four areas is necessary to confirm a project's viability and ensure compliance with HUD regulations.
World Finance Review Sep_2014 KazakhstanRobert Jutson
This document discusses tools for evaluating capital investment projects. It outlines essential traits for successful projects, including proven resources, creditworthy offtakers, reliable contractors, and efficient plants. It also provides an overview of qualitative and quantitative ways to assess macro risks, such as currency and regulations, and project-specific risks like resource availability and construction delays. Examples are given of how these tools were applied to rank competing solar and cement projects. Applying such systematic evaluation methods can help management improve investment decisions under uncertain market conditions.
This document compares key provisions of three proposals for reauthorizing federal surface transportation programs: the GROW AMERICA Act proposed by President Obama, the Senate's MAP-21 Reauthorization Act, and the yet-to-be-released House proposal. It outlines differences in program structure and funding levels, including the Senate proposing a six-year bill compared to Obama's four-year proposal. It also details differences in policies around freight funding, project delivery reforms, and other issues.
The document provides an overview of updates and changes between the NPR 7120.5D and the proposed NPR 7120.5D NID. Key changes include incorporating lessons learned from implementing NPR 7120.5D, updates to be consistent with revised NASA policies around governance, acquisition, and risk management, and responses to user feedback and external drivers. The NID aims to capture policy developments, correct errors, and clarify or modify existing requirements. It describes the types of changes in categories like consistency updates, confidence level policy enhancements, terminology revisions, and strategic planning meeting definitions.
The document discusses different approaches for evaluating and ranking multiple projects with constraints. It describes methods like ranking projects based on importance, and mathematical programming approaches like linear programming and integer linear programming models. These models aim to maximize objectives like net present value while considering constraints like limited capital budgets and project dependencies. The integer programming model is highlighted as being able to handle project interdependencies and capital projects that cannot be partially accepted.
This document outlines the methodology for project appraisal. It discusses how appraisal involves carefully reviewing project data, assumptions, plans, costs, financing, organization, and viability. It also examines projects from technical, financial, economic, institutional, and social perspectives. The goal of appraisal is to determine if a project is sound and justified from both an individual and economy-wide viewpoint. It describes how different sections analyze technical, financial, economic, and social aspects of a project. Finally, it discusses techniques for appraisal such as discounted and undiscounted cash flows, as well as the importance of considering incremental costs and benefits compared to a base case without the project.
In this session participants will work with experts to develop a sample logical framework for their project.
o OBJECTIVE: Participants will identify inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts for their projects
This document summarizes several primary projects including:
1) A beneficiary update project at GBOP to consolidate records and ensure accurate benefits processing.
2) Implementation of 2008 General Conference petitions including retirement plan changes.
3) Ensuring GBOP compliance with 403(b) regulations by January 2009.
4) Replacing GBOP's health plan system within a reduced budget after issues with the original vendor.
This document discusses opportunity studies conducted at the subsector level to identify potential investment projects. It outlines the objectives, scope, data sources, organization, and outputs of opportunity studies. Key points include: Opportunity studies provide relevant information and data on subsectors to enable investors to identify the best opportunities and lower costs of feasibility studies. They draw data from public and private sources and are often conducted by public development institutions. The studies result in an executive summary that concisely describes typical projects in a subsector, business conditions, and recommendations. The summary highlights feasibility for decision makers.
This webinar discuss how a community can get funding for transportation projects, where the money comes from, and what is eligible to be a funded project. You will also learn about the new addition to the process, which is quarterly tracking and the reports that go along with tracking.
Presented by Belynda Petrie at the International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF), South Africa, 14-17 November 2011.
The International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF) is the premier gathering of water and food scientists working on improving water management for agricultural production in developing countries.
The CGIAR Challenge Program for Water and Food (CPWF) represents one of the most comprehensive investments in the world on water, food and environment research.The Forum explores how the CPWF research-for-development (R4D) approach can address water and food challenges through a combination of process, institutional and technical innovations.
El documento describe el teletrabajo en la administración pública peruana. Define el teletrabajo y la ley que lo regula, señalando que permite el desempeño de labores a distancia mediante tecnologías de la información. También discute las ventajas e importancia de las TIC para el teletrabajo, así como la situación actual en la administración pública, donde el teletrabajo puede ser elemento para mejorar procesos y la imagen de la burocracia.
La autora describe su experiencia como inmigrante en Estados Unidos y los desafíos que enfrentó al llegar. A pesar de las dificultades del idioma y la cultura, trabajó duro para establecer una nueva vida y ahora se siente agradecida por las oportunidades en su nuevo hogar.
This document provides an overview of capital budgeting techniques that will be covered in a Principles of Finance course. It discusses the key steps in the capital budgeting process, including proposal generation, review and analysis, decision making, implementation, and follow-up. Basic terminology like independent vs mutually exclusive projects, unlimited funds vs capital rationing, and accept-reject vs ranking approaches are defined. Specific capital budgeting techniques like payback period and average accounting return are explained, with examples provided to illustrate how to calculate them and use them to evaluate potential capital expenditure projects.
This workshop will explore how organizations can utilize various federal, state, and private financing sources combined with innovative ideas to create affordable rural rental housing for veterans, seniors, and families. Participants will learn to analyze project cash flow, maximize private investment, leverage tax credits, and bridge financing gaps.
The Role of the Business Case in Public Investment Management and Project Por...Dr Rupert Booth
The document outlines Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Management (PIM) framework and Project Portfolio Planning (PPP) process. It introduces the Five Case Model business case approach used in PPP. The model assesses the strategic, economic, commercial, financial, and management cases for projects. It then discusses each step of Saudi Arabia's PPP process in detail, including screening projects using a strategic assessment, risk assessment, and strategic outline case with cost-benefit analysis. The best projects are prioritized to create a five-year project portfolio plan. Project execution is supported by a stage gate process and standardized 'White Book' procedures.
NASA is required to regularly report cost and schedule performance data to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for its major projects. The types of reports include baseline reports, current estimate reports, threshold reports if growth exceeds certain levels, and rebaseline reports if costs grow by 30% or more. NASA manages this reporting by linking it to agency policies and using a single standardized data tracking system to provide consistent information across all reports on project-managed costs, unfunded enhancements held by program offices, and other agency-managed costs.
This document discusses cash flow management for large infrastructure projects in India. It notes that infrastructure projects require huge capital investments but often face delays and cost overruns. An effective cash flow management model is needed to precisely predict capital outflows and optimize the use of funds over time. The document proposes a mathematical model for rolling, flexible cash flow management that provides a practical solution to minimize capital costs and optimize cash flows on a monthly basis.
This document summarizes the key requirements under 24 CFR §92.250 (b)(2) for assessing applications for HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding. It outlines the "Big Four" criteria that must be addressed: (1) an assessment of current market demand; (2) the experience of the developer; (3) the financial capacity of the developer; and (4) firm written financial commitments for the project. It provides guidance on how to demonstrate each of these criteria, including through statistical data, financial statements and ratios, and fully executed commitment letters. Addressing these four areas is necessary to confirm a project's viability and ensure compliance with HUD regulations.
World Finance Review Sep_2014 KazakhstanRobert Jutson
This document discusses tools for evaluating capital investment projects. It outlines essential traits for successful projects, including proven resources, creditworthy offtakers, reliable contractors, and efficient plants. It also provides an overview of qualitative and quantitative ways to assess macro risks, such as currency and regulations, and project-specific risks like resource availability and construction delays. Examples are given of how these tools were applied to rank competing solar and cement projects. Applying such systematic evaluation methods can help management improve investment decisions under uncertain market conditions.
This document compares key provisions of three proposals for reauthorizing federal surface transportation programs: the GROW AMERICA Act proposed by President Obama, the Senate's MAP-21 Reauthorization Act, and the yet-to-be-released House proposal. It outlines differences in program structure and funding levels, including the Senate proposing a six-year bill compared to Obama's four-year proposal. It also details differences in policies around freight funding, project delivery reforms, and other issues.
The document provides an overview of updates and changes between the NPR 7120.5D and the proposed NPR 7120.5D NID. Key changes include incorporating lessons learned from implementing NPR 7120.5D, updates to be consistent with revised NASA policies around governance, acquisition, and risk management, and responses to user feedback and external drivers. The NID aims to capture policy developments, correct errors, and clarify or modify existing requirements. It describes the types of changes in categories like consistency updates, confidence level policy enhancements, terminology revisions, and strategic planning meeting definitions.
The document discusses different approaches for evaluating and ranking multiple projects with constraints. It describes methods like ranking projects based on importance, and mathematical programming approaches like linear programming and integer linear programming models. These models aim to maximize objectives like net present value while considering constraints like limited capital budgets and project dependencies. The integer programming model is highlighted as being able to handle project interdependencies and capital projects that cannot be partially accepted.
This document outlines the methodology for project appraisal. It discusses how appraisal involves carefully reviewing project data, assumptions, plans, costs, financing, organization, and viability. It also examines projects from technical, financial, economic, institutional, and social perspectives. The goal of appraisal is to determine if a project is sound and justified from both an individual and economy-wide viewpoint. It describes how different sections analyze technical, financial, economic, and social aspects of a project. Finally, it discusses techniques for appraisal such as discounted and undiscounted cash flows, as well as the importance of considering incremental costs and benefits compared to a base case without the project.
In this session participants will work with experts to develop a sample logical framework for their project.
o OBJECTIVE: Participants will identify inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts for their projects
This document summarizes several primary projects including:
1) A beneficiary update project at GBOP to consolidate records and ensure accurate benefits processing.
2) Implementation of 2008 General Conference petitions including retirement plan changes.
3) Ensuring GBOP compliance with 403(b) regulations by January 2009.
4) Replacing GBOP's health plan system within a reduced budget after issues with the original vendor.
This document discusses opportunity studies conducted at the subsector level to identify potential investment projects. It outlines the objectives, scope, data sources, organization, and outputs of opportunity studies. Key points include: Opportunity studies provide relevant information and data on subsectors to enable investors to identify the best opportunities and lower costs of feasibility studies. They draw data from public and private sources and are often conducted by public development institutions. The studies result in an executive summary that concisely describes typical projects in a subsector, business conditions, and recommendations. The summary highlights feasibility for decision makers.
This webinar discuss how a community can get funding for transportation projects, where the money comes from, and what is eligible to be a funded project. You will also learn about the new addition to the process, which is quarterly tracking and the reports that go along with tracking.
Presented by Belynda Petrie at the International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF), South Africa, 14-17 November 2011.
The International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF) is the premier gathering of water and food scientists working on improving water management for agricultural production in developing countries.
The CGIAR Challenge Program for Water and Food (CPWF) represents one of the most comprehensive investments in the world on water, food and environment research.The Forum explores how the CPWF research-for-development (R4D) approach can address water and food challenges through a combination of process, institutional and technical innovations.
El documento describe el teletrabajo en la administración pública peruana. Define el teletrabajo y la ley que lo regula, señalando que permite el desempeño de labores a distancia mediante tecnologías de la información. También discute las ventajas e importancia de las TIC para el teletrabajo, así como la situación actual en la administración pública, donde el teletrabajo puede ser elemento para mejorar procesos y la imagen de la burocracia.
La autora describe su experiencia como inmigrante en Estados Unidos y los desafíos que enfrentó al llegar. A pesar de las dificultades del idioma y la cultura, trabajó duro para establecer una nueva vida y ahora se siente agradecida por las oportunidades en su nuevo hogar.
This document provides instructions for creating and sharing web comics using an online tool that allows users to select backgrounds, characters, save, edit and share their comics as well as browse other users' comics and contact the website creators.
La Agenda Digital Peruana es un conjunto de políticas públicas basadas en las Tecnologías de la Información destinadas a contribuir al desarrollo económico y social del país y mejorar el gobierno a través de una mayor participación ciudadana. Fue aprobada en 2006 y actualizada en 2011 para promover la aplicación de las TIC en diversos sectores de Perú. La Agenda Digital es desarrollada por la Comisión Multisectorial CODESI, compuesta por representantes del gobierno, empresas y academia organizados en mesas temáticas.
This document is the introduction and dedication sections of a book titled "In The Trauma of Abuse" by Javvi. It discusses the author's experiences with childhood abuse and trauma, and thanks the many people and resources that helped her heal and improve her life, including motivational speakers, instructors, and her two children. The author is proud of writing this book and helping others dealing with similar struggles by sharing her story of overcoming difficulties through personal growth.
El documento resume la evolución histórica del concepto de contrato desde el Derecho Romano hasta el Derecho Moderno. En el Derecho Romano, el contrato se refería a un "asunto concluido" pero no existía como disciplina autónoma. El Derecho Canónico introdujo la "moral" en la contratación y conceptos como la buena fe. La Escolástica Tardía trajo el comercio masivo y los contratos se convirtieron en el principal instrumento jurídico. Finalmente, el Código Napoleónico de 1804 est
Oki Yosevi's CV summarizes his educational and professional background. He received a degree in Mechanical Engineering from Padang State University in 2015. His work experience includes positions as a Design Engineer at PT. HPU Batam since 2016 where he designs and develops new products, and as a Quality Control engineer ensuring products meet specifications. He also tutors AutoCAD and SolidWorks as a side job. His skills include CAD software, Indonesian and English languages, and mechanical areas like hydraulics and pneumatics.
Las columnas son soportes estructurales que soportan techos u otros elementos arquitectónicos. Pueden clasificarse según su orden arquitectónico (dórico, jónico, corintio, compuesto o toscano), su forma (lisa, estriada, fasciculada, salomónica o agrupada) o el material que las compone (madera, acero o concreto armado). Las columnas transmiten cargas a los cimientos y soportan esfuerzos de compresión y flexión, por lo que el concreto requiere
Los documentos describen las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) y su aplicación en los gobiernos locales. Se caracterizan las TIC por utilizar soportes físicos como la microelectrónica y tener gran componente de software. Sin embargo, a pesar de su potencial para mejorar la eficiencia y participación ciudadana, los gobiernos locales a menudo no promueven adecuadamente el uso de las TIC, lo que mantiene una brecha digital entre ciudadanos.
Organizing for Strategic Planning April 28-April 29 2016Alexandra Tranmer
This document outlines best practices for strategic planning engagement and implementation. It recommends taking an inclusive approach to stakeholder involvement by erring on the side of being all-inclusive. Key groups to engage include businesses, organizations, citizens, and elected officials. The engagement process should build capacity for implementation through developing trust, skills, and shared understanding. Implementation begins during the planning process. Leadership is important and should include well-respected individuals able to recruit others and be fair and ethical. Advisory teams provide expertise while task forces conduct specific work. A consulting team can help with facilitation and analysis but community involvement is still needed. Public relations ensures communication with stakeholders throughout.
Este documento explica el tiempo pasado simple en inglés. Se usa para acciones completadas en el pasado. Incluye los verbos regulares e irregulares, las formas negativas e interrogativas, y ejemplos de expresiones de tiempo como "yesterday" y "last week".
Capital Project Funds are used to account for financial resources used to acquire or construct major capital assets like land, buildings, infrastructure, and equipment. Projects are usually large expenditures that result in long-lived assets. Once a project is complete, any remaining funds are transferred to other funds like debt service funds. Transactions are recorded using journal entries to debit expenses and credit the capital project fund. At the end of the project, the fund is closed out and any remaining balance is transferred to other funds.
The document discusses contracting best practices for large, complex IT projects undertaken by state governments. It outlines both "not so good" practices like rushed procurement processes and sole source contracts, as well as "smart" practices and best practices. These include establishing clear deliverables and milestones, payment schedules correlated to vendor costs, dedicated contract managers, and change control processes. The presentation provides guidance for setting up contracts that balance project needs with financial compliance in complex government IT projects.
This document discusses different types of projects and how they can be financed. It provides examples of two companies - M/s UB Petroproducts Ltd and M/s Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd - that undertook projects and how they financed them. It also discusses basics of interest rates, how they are determined, and their implications for project financing. Key points covered include different sources of funding for add-on, ongoing and greenfield projects, debt to equity ratios for the example companies' projects, and components that determine interest rates charged by financial institutions.
The document summarizes recent measures taken by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to streamline its project cycle. It discusses changes such as approving Project Preparation Grants together with project concepts, increasing funding ceilings, simplifying templates, and adjusting fees. Major and minor project amendments are defined, and procedures for making amendments before and after CEO endorsement are outlined. Streamlined measures for umbrella projects and agency transfers are also summarized.
This document discusses preparing a capital budget and capital improvement plan. It identifies the key phases of a capital budget as planning, budget analysis/project evaluation, and acquiring/managing funds. A capital improvement plan is a spending plan over 3-5 years that identifies high-cost projects. The document discusses justifying, prioritizing, and defending proposed capital projects, as well as different financing methods like pay-as-you-go and debt financing using bonds or loans.
A Public Private Partnership Approch to Climate FinanceAldo Baietti
The detrimental effects of climate change are growing, yet investments in clean technologies are still grossly insufficient, making it necessary to re-think how these projects should be evaluated, structured and financed in order to render them viable and attractive opportunities to polluting alternatives. Existing approaches lack key features in order to adequately address the key financing challenges of these investments, and do not utilize public support to its maximum effectiveness. The international community is essential in resolving this financing challenge, and host governments need to create an environment that levels the playing field for green investments vis-à-vis their conventional alternatives. The Green Infrastructure Finance Framework places clean investments in a commonly understood framework of structured finance with public finance components, as in many hybrid PPPs. The framework includes four
main elements: (i) a viability gap methodology for evaluating, structuring and equitably allocating financing responsibilities to different private and public parties; (ii) linkage to a country’s PPP’s procurement and regulatory framework along with an MRV component for ensuring the service obligations of projects; (iii) measures for addressing the adequacy of the climate for these investments; and (iv) a financing and advisory interface for allocating a wide variety of public sources of financing in a coherent fashion.
This document discusses capital budgeting, which relates to long-term investment decisions for firms. It defines capital budgeting as decisions regarding long-term assets that provide benefits over multiple years in the future. Some key points made include:
- Capital budgeting decisions involve large amounts of funds for long-term goals and are difficult and irreversible.
- The capital budgeting process considers total assets, business risk, and the cost of capital. It also distinguishes between unlimited funds and capital rationing situations.
- The capital budgeting process involves five steps: proposal generation, review and analysis, decision-making, implementation, and follow-up.
- Popular capital budgeting methods are discussed, including
The document provides information about capital outlay administration in New Mexico. It discusses the role of the Capital Outlay Bureau in coordinating funding and oversight of capital projects. It outlines tools like the capital outlay dashboard and request forms. It summarizes capital appropriations from the 2022 legislative session. It also discusses the capital outlay implementation process including executive orders, grant agreements, and the capital projects monitoring system. Contact information is provided for state agency capital outlay representatives.
The presentation covers project constraints: project dependence, capital rationing, project invisibility. It covers comparing project under constraints: methods of ranking, ranking conflicts,
This document discusses design-build-operate-finance (DBOF) as a project delivery method for water infrastructure projects. It provides background on DBOF models and financing options, the role of the design-builder, and examples of DBOF projects. Key advantages of DBOF include accelerating project delivery, achieving life-cycle cost management, and expanding access to capital. However, complex transaction costs and local preferences regarding ownership can present obstacles.
UC Real Estate Professional Development: Financing ToolsThe Port
Financing tools workshop: an overview of new and bedrock tools of development finance, presented March 24, 2015 at University of Cincinnati Real Estate Center
by Susan E. Thomas, Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority and Matt Staarmann of Ross, Sinclaire and Associates
Capital budgeting (1)- Management accountingJithin Zcs
This document discusses investment decision rules and capital budgeting. It begins by outlining common investment decision rules like payback period, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and accounting rate of return. It notes that NPV and IRR are preferred as they consider the time value of money. The document then discusses capital budgeting, highlighting the importance of estimating incremental cash flows and ignoring sunk costs. It provides the format for determining initial cash outflows and interim incremental net cash flows for investment projects.
Project finance is the financing of long-term infrastructure, industrial projects and public services based upon a non-recourse or limited recourse financial structure, in which project debt and equity used to finance the project are paid back from the cash flow generated by the project. Project financing is a loan structure that relies primarily on the project's cash flow for repayment, with the project's assets, rights and interests held as secondary security or collateral. Project finance is especially attractive to the private sector because companies can fund major projects off balance sheet.
The document discusses various capital budgeting techniques used to evaluate investment projects, including net present value (NPV), payback period, internal rate of return (IRR), and profitability index (PI). It provides definitions and explanations of each method. The key steps in a typical capital budgeting process are identified as idea generation, analyzing proposals, creating a capital budget, and monitoring decisions. The importance of using good capital budgeting techniques to increase competitiveness and shareholder wealth is highlighted. Challenges with some methods and how results can differ between IRR and NPV for certain types of projects are also covered.
The document summarizes Rockingham County, Virginia's Capital Improvements Program for fiscal years 2016-2020. It outlines 45 capital project requests totaling $164.7 million from various county departments. The largest categories are education (24%), public safety (35%), and public works (33%). It then provides details on each of the 9 education project requests totaling $39.4 million, including digital conversion of schools, bus replacement, and facility maintenance. The program aims to anticipate future needs, avoid duplication, and help spread costs over multiple years.
This chapter discusses the importance of cash flow management for projects. It defines cash flow as the movement of funds in and out of a project over time. Poor cash flow can cause projects to fall behind schedule and over budget. The chapter examines cash flow considerations for both project sponsors and contractors. It also covers various methods for evaluating project financial viability, including net present value, internal rate of return, profitability index, and payback period. Finally, it discusses payment arrangements, claims, variations, price adjustments, and retentions which all impact project cash flows.
Manual Project in Public Sector including the stages of initiation, preparation of PC-I,PC-2, Public Private Partnerships, Different modes of Public Private Partnerships, Appraisal including the Risk Assessment, Monitoring and Control and Closure stage of the project.
1. Capital Outlay:
Review and Funding Processes
Michael D. Maul, Associate Director
Dick Hall-Sizemore, Senior Analyst
August 3, 2015
Department of Planning and Budget
3. 3
• Evolution of Capital Outlay Funding Environment: past to present
• Capital Budget Development: step-by-step
• Capital Pool Process: step-by-step
• Equipment Funding: when to request
• Non-pool Projects: purpose and types
• Maintenance Reserve: eligibility criteria
• Capital Leases: purpose and types
• Emergency Projects: eligibility criteria
• ESCO Projects: appropriate cases
Capital Items we will cover today
3
4. Present Capital Situation
4
Capital Environment
• Debt capacity limited
• Likely large bond package
Evolution of the pool process
• Background of Chapter 1, 2008 Special Session 1 (Pool Process)
• Relationship of DPB and DGS (BCOM)
• Role of the Six Pack Committee
6. Capital Budget Development:
Capital Budget Request (CBR) in PB System
• Project description/justification
• Scope
• Estimated $$ cost
6
Definition of Capital
• Acquisition (All types)
• Improvements ($1 million state agencies, $2 million higher ed)
• Construction (≥$1/$2 million or ≥5,000 sq. ft.)
7. 7
Phases in capital budget development
7
June - July
BCOM works on cost
review and DPB
analysts verify
programmatic need
BCOM finishes
cost review
Governor decides
which projects to
include in the budget
bill and the six year
capital outlay plan
LEGISLATURE ACTS
July - Early September
GOVERNOR ACTS
DPB issues instructions
to agencies
Agencies generate &
submit requests
DPB Analyst Review
Identifies projects for
BCOM cost review
Six Pack meets to
recommend capital
projects for the 6 year
capital outlay plan, using
analyses from SCHEV,
DPB, Money Committee
Staff and BCOM
Associate Directors,
Budget Director and
Secretary of Finance
determine final
recommendations
for the Governor
General Assembly
takes action on the
Governor's proposal
BUDGET PREPARATION
REVIEW & RECOMMENDATION
DPB analysts make
recommendations to
Associate Directors
Mid September - November December – March or April (longer GA session)
9. 9
Funding SourceFunding Criteria
• Central Planning Fund
• Agencies’ own nongeneral funds
• BCOM reviews both preplanning and detailed planning
• BCOM estimate for total project cost based on detailed planning
Planning funding for projects under pool process
• Preplanning (up to $250,000)
• Detailed Planning (4% new
construction; 5% renovation)
9
10. Construction Cost Review under Pool Process
Funding for projects put into a pool of authorized funding
• If detailed planning has not yet been done, requires BCOM review to determine final construction price
• Projects are not guaranteed any specific $$ amount from the pool
• Once BCOM issues a funding report based on its review of detailed planning, agency submits a CO-2 equal
to the amount authorized in the funding report
• CO-2 approved by BCOM; sent to DPB; DPB reviews in conjunction with a BEX transferring funding from
the pool to the agency for the capital project
10
Bid $ > $Funding Report
• Reduce the scope, or
• Use own nongeneral funds, or
• Request additional funding from
the General Assembly
• Appeal to BCOM/DPB for additional
funding amount up to 5 %
• Submit revised CO-2
• DPB only allot funding = to the bid
$Bid > $Funding Report + 5 %
$Bid ≠ $ Funding Report
Scenarios
Bid $ < $ Funding Report
11. 11
Umbrella Pool Projects vs Phased Pool Projects
Umbrella projects funding:
• Amount of funding available is up to the budgeted funding amount (i.e.,
umbrella projects not eligible for the 5% cost overrun)
Phased projects funding:
• 5% cost overrun rule is applicable
• Any funding unspent from a completed project will be transferred back
to the pool
12. The Pool Process
Phases, Critical Milestones and Detailed Cost Reviews
1
2
Detailed cost review ensures the project is “right-sized” and the funding is appropriate to complete the design and construct the facility. This establishes the basis for
the application of the “105% rule.” This is the most critical “GO” for an agency in the pool process as it typically allows them to “proceed with execution.”
Cost check ensures bids are within authorized funding; based upon bid prices, either maintain current project funding (typically the case), reduce project funding if
exceptionally low bids received, or increase project funding via an agency appeal up to 105% of that amount determined at milestone 1. If bids result in project(pool
$) > 105% as defined at milestone 1, then agency must either reduce scope, provide more agency funding, or request additional $ from GA.
12
.
CONSTRUCTIONDESIGN
SchematicCostReview
(SchematicReport)
(Guidance/DialoguewithAgencies)
WORKING DRAWINGS
Design 3
PRELIMINARY
Design 2
SCHEMATIC
Design 1
Preplanning
Detailed Planning
CapitalBudgetRequest
CostReview(CO-2)
Post-BidReceiptCostCheck(CO-2/8);Building
Permit(CO-17)
2
PreliminaryCostReview(CO-2)
1
Warranty &
close-out
(~ 1 year)
Construction
Project
Phases
Funding
Phases
CertificateofOccupancy(CO-13.3)
ProjectCompletionReport(CO-14)
14. Equipment Funding
Issue
• Some capital construction pools include equipment funding (FF&E) for
each project, while most pools do not
• Each agency should talk to their DPB analyst to determine whether a
construction pool includes equipment or not
• Most times the pool will not include FF&E and the agency will need to
submit a separate capital budget request to DPB for this funding
14
POOL FF&E
2008 Chapter 1 Excluded
2011 Chapter 890 Included
2012 Chapter 3 Included
2013 Chapter 806 Excluded
2014 Chapter 1 Caboose Excluded
2014 Chapter 2 Included
2015 Chapter 665 Excluded
15. Equipment Cont’d
Process
• DPB will NOT initiate a request for equipment funding – it is the
responsibility of the agency to submit a request
• Agencies need to judge the timing of the request for equipment in
accordance with the anticipated completion date for the project (this is
also true for stand alone projects that require FF&E)
• DPB will not recommend funding equipment unless it needs to become
available within 6-9 months of project completion
• DPB will base its funding recommendation on the amount identified in
the BCOM funding report; if agency request exceeds that amount, it
must provide justification
15
17. Non-pool capital projects
Projects not subject to pool process include:
17
Traditional
NGF Projects
• DGIF, DMV, VDOT,
higher education
auxiliary, federal.
Revenue Bond
Projects
• Revenue bond
projects 9(c)
and 9(d)
• Mostly higher ed
Other GF and
bond projects
• Authorized as
stand alone
projects in
Appropriation Act
• Up to 20% will be allotted for A&E (architectural and engineering services),
with balance allotted after construction contract awarded
18. Maintenance Reserve
18
Process
• DPB no longer has to validate projects in advance
• Agencies free to use funds on projects, as needed, consistent
with the guidelines for maintenance reserve use
• Agencies report annually on previous fiscal year’s expenditures
• If agencies fail to follow criteria, subject to having projects
reviewed in advance and validated
19. Capital Leases
19
Subject to capital outlay process since leases can affect debt
capacity
Criteria of Capital Lease
• Building ownership reverts to agency at end of lease at no or nominal cost
• Lease for long duration that covers a substantial portion of the useful life of the
property
Lease vs purchase analysis
• What’s most effective and economical: long term lease or a new building
• Do analysis at least a year or two before current lease ends
• Work with DRES to proceed with capital lease or buying existing building
Lease payments paid from operating funds
20. Emergency Projects
20
Basic assumption of Appropriation Act that the General Assembly must approve capital
projects; however, “emergencies” do not happen on schedule.
When Immediate Need arises between GA sessions for a capital project
Governor granted authority to create capital project in certain situations:
Emergency situations
Higher ed projects to be funded by revenues or sponsored programs or private gifts and indirect cost
recoveries
Plant or property received as a gift
Project recommended by Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission or Virginia
Tobacco Settlement Foundation
Criteria
• Nongeneral funds sources available
• Governor feels the project results in measurable benefit for the state or cost avoidance
• Detailed justification for project includes cost estimates and fund sources
• Money Committees’ Chairmen to be notified prior to the Governor’s authorization
Process
• Agency notifies DPB of emergency or immediate need
• DPB prepares decision brief for the Governor
• Governor either authorizes or declines to authorize the project
21. ESCO Projects
21
Key features of the Energy Service Company (ESCO) projects:
• Results in significant energy savings
• DMME must review and approve
• DGS has a standard contract and list of approved vendors
• Maintenance reserve funding can be used on activity or component that
results in energy savings that equal project costs
Levels of Approval
Operating Expense when:
Total cost ≤ $3million, or ≥$ 3million but ≤ $7 million if energy savings offset the cost
Capital Expense when:
Total cost ≥ $3 million but ≤ $7 million and energy savings do NOT offset the cost
Total cost greater than $7 million
DPB notification required for any project costing ≥ $ 250,000
23. 23
23
Department of Planning and Budget
Michael D. Maul
Associate Director
(804) 786-6657
Michael.Maul@dpb.virginia.gov
Dick Hall-Sizemore
Senior Budget Analyst
(804) 786-6187
Dick.Hall-Sizemore@dpb.virginia.gov
Additional Information can be found at:
Virginia Department of Planning and Budget
dpb.virginia.gov
Bureau of Capital Outlay Management
dgs.virginia.gov/DivisionofEngineeringandBuildings/BCOM