Does the moon move by gravity (nobel prize claim reason)
•
0 likes•66 views
The Moon doesn't move by the gravity forces between his and Earth masses… The solar planet generally doesn't move by gravity forces.. This paper provides proves for this conclusion….
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Particle double nature reason
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Earth axial tilt
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
The Moon indeed moves by Gravity (III)
- Earth Moon Motion proves "The Train Motion Concept"
- "The Train Motion Concept" states that the solar planets move together as train carriages – i.e. – there's no solar planet moves individually or independently from others –instead –all solar planets move together (as train moves with its carriages together)- this concept is explained in 2nd hypothesis of my research.
- Earth & Moon Motions show their cooperation with Saturn one.
- Earth, Moon and Saturn Motions show a deep cooperation between 3 planets – which produce the following data:
Harmony Data
1. Earth daily moves a distance =2.58 mkm = 0.985 degrees to complete 360 degrees in 365.25 days… i.e. Earth during 29.53 days move 29.2 degrees
And
2. The moon moves daily 2.58 mkm but the moon during the day moves 13.18 degrees to perform 360 degrees during 27.3 days
Means
- The moon during 29.53 days move a distance = 389.2 degrees
389.2 degrees – 360 degrees = 29.2 degrees ….Why these values equal?
I- More Data
Metonic Cycle Period 6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (Sidereal Days)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
Saros Cycle Period 6585.321 days = 241 x 27.32 days (Lunar Sidereal Month)
= 19 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 223 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
The harmony in degrees are seen in the cycles harmony
This harmony proves (1) The Train Motion Concept (2) Earth & Saturn cooperation
Is There A Parallel Universe (III)
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Recommended
Particle double nature reason
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Earth axial tilt
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theory
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
The Moon indeed moves by Gravity (III)
- Earth Moon Motion proves "The Train Motion Concept"
- "The Train Motion Concept" states that the solar planets move together as train carriages – i.e. – there's no solar planet moves individually or independently from others –instead –all solar planets move together (as train moves with its carriages together)- this concept is explained in 2nd hypothesis of my research.
- Earth & Moon Motions show their cooperation with Saturn one.
- Earth, Moon and Saturn Motions show a deep cooperation between 3 planets – which produce the following data:
Harmony Data
1. Earth daily moves a distance =2.58 mkm = 0.985 degrees to complete 360 degrees in 365.25 days… i.e. Earth during 29.53 days move 29.2 degrees
And
2. The moon moves daily 2.58 mkm but the moon during the day moves 13.18 degrees to perform 360 degrees during 27.3 days
Means
- The moon during 29.53 days move a distance = 389.2 degrees
389.2 degrees – 360 degrees = 29.2 degrees ….Why these values equal?
I- More Data
Metonic Cycle Period 6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (Sidereal Days)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
Saros Cycle Period 6585.321 days = 241 x 27.32 days (Lunar Sidereal Month)
= 19 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 223 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
The harmony in degrees are seen in the cycles harmony
This harmony proves (1) The Train Motion Concept (2) Earth & Saturn cooperation
Is There A Parallel Universe (III)
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Mercury jupiter distance (revised)
Mercury Jupiter Distance with Mercury other data supports my claim that,
"The Solar Group is One Machine, Each planet is One Gear In It"
Let's review this idea here again….. I suggest that,
The Matter is created from Energy (this is true based on the Equation E=mc2)
The Distance is created from Energy (my hypothesis)
That means, the Matter and Distance are created from the same Energy,
That means, the whole solar group is created from the same one energy which guarantees the motions harmony.
The matter should be seen as point of light coherence or energy lines connection where the energy is carried in the distances as in matters
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Why Mars had immigrated with the Sun Creation
The Paper Hypothesis:
Because of The Sun Creation- Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)- after its Immigration– Mars had created configurations for its Data with the other planets –i.e. – Many Planets had changed their (own) data to be in configuration with Mars Data (Orbital Distance) – and because of these Data changes we could - through Planets Data analysis - conclude and prove Mars Immigration event through the solar system history.
Mars Immigration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (I)
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus position in the sky
Uranus and Neptune orbit perpendicular to the plane of the other planets. The document provides equations showing relationships between planetary orbital distances, periods, and axial tilts intended to support this. In particular, it argues Uranus' unusually high axial tilt of 97.8 degrees results from relativistic effects and relationships to the moon's orbit via the Metonic cycle.
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Solar group geometrical structure
Abstract
- Human mind works by light velocity, that's why we see the light around us as matter, because there's no difference in velocity between our minds operation speed and light velocity
- That necessitates Earth to move with light velocity relative to the sun to create the sun light beams.
- That's why the solar group has more than one frame
- The distance is an energy, that's proved by Moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (otherwise how the distance can be moved?)
- The matter is bright fringes and distance is dark fringes both are produced by the same light coherence.
- Light Velocity creates Lorentz contraction phenomenon for many distances (with the same rate 7.25%) which can be a crucial proof for the claim
introduction
This paper discusses the solar group geometrical structure, and provides a clear claim as following:
- The Solar group is created by an energy; which is transported through the group from point to another,
- This transported energy through the solar group, creates Solar Planets matters, orbital distances and other data
- The solar planets data are produced by this transported energy to give the chance for this transported energy to pass through
So
- The solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, at end of each canal the water creates a soil from its clay (energy), so all these canals are related to each other, effect on each other and also their different soils are related to each other, to the different canals and to the main river.
- The Previous idea gives us a general vision for the solar group whole structure,
- The main point is related to the energy
- As the river water is transported through the canals and create the canals forms and motions
- Very similar to that, the Energy is transported through the solar group creating the planets matters and suitable motions in harmony providing the chance for the energy to pass
This paper is divided into 2 parts as following:
Part One
• Point No.3 –Theory of Matter Creation
Part Two
The solar Group Creation as an application on "Matter Creation Theory"
• Introduction
• Point No.4 Jupiter Energy
• Point No.5 The Coherence Event
• Point No.6 Angle θ and Mars Data
• Point No.7 Solar Planets Motions Description
• Point No.8 Solar Masses Distribution
• Point No.9 Jupiter and inner planets relationships
• Point No. 10 Jupiter Origin Energy
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in the solar group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the Sun and the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will revolve around the Earth also because both of them connected by this same one line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it was correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the result will be the same, because both of them contributed to create the main line in the solar group
10- And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees yearly, as a circle motion
11- So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our wrong vision for the sun motion…
12- I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the sun, but Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13- The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14- The previous modification can give us some explanation for the Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which Mercury, Venus and Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth on 3/12/2012 (on the three Egyptian pyramids heads - appendix No.1),
15- Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun but also revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (IV)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Uranus Effect On Mercury Motion
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (III)
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion)
Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?
Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry?
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
This document discusses the effects of Jupiter and Uranus on the geometry of the solar system. It hypothesizes that Jupiter has a horizontal effect that controls the XY plane and defines the consistency between planetary orbital inclinations. Uranus is proposed to have a vertical effect that defines the Z-axis and prevents planetary overturning motions by forcing same-direction revolution around the sun. Several equations are presented relating planetary data like distances, tilts, and inclinations to Jupiter's energy, circumference, and axial tilt, arguing this supports Jupiter having a dominant horizontal effect on solar system geometry. Uranus' effect is proposed to be seen in the inner planets' data being related to Uranus' 90 degree figures like its 97
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Special relativity hypothesis reason
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
More Related Content
What's hot
Mercury jupiter distance (revised)
Mercury Jupiter Distance with Mercury other data supports my claim that,
"The Solar Group is One Machine, Each planet is One Gear In It"
Let's review this idea here again….. I suggest that,
The Matter is created from Energy (this is true based on the Equation E=mc2)
The Distance is created from Energy (my hypothesis)
That means, the Matter and Distance are created from the same Energy,
That means, the whole solar group is created from the same one energy which guarantees the motions harmony.
The matter should be seen as point of light coherence or energy lines connection where the energy is carried in the distances as in matters
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Why Mars had immigrated with the Sun Creation
The Paper Hypothesis:
Because of The Sun Creation- Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)- after its Immigration– Mars had created configurations for its Data with the other planets –i.e. – Many Planets had changed their (own) data to be in configuration with Mars Data (Orbital Distance) – and because of these Data changes we could - through Planets Data analysis - conclude and prove Mars Immigration event through the solar system history.
Mars Immigration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (I)
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus position in the sky
Uranus and Neptune orbit perpendicular to the plane of the other planets. The document provides equations showing relationships between planetary orbital distances, periods, and axial tilts intended to support this. In particular, it argues Uranus' unusually high axial tilt of 97.8 degrees results from relativistic effects and relationships to the moon's orbit via the Metonic cycle.
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Solar group geometrical structure
Abstract
- Human mind works by light velocity, that's why we see the light around us as matter, because there's no difference in velocity between our minds operation speed and light velocity
- That necessitates Earth to move with light velocity relative to the sun to create the sun light beams.
- That's why the solar group has more than one frame
- The distance is an energy, that's proved by Moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (otherwise how the distance can be moved?)
- The matter is bright fringes and distance is dark fringes both are produced by the same light coherence.
- Light Velocity creates Lorentz contraction phenomenon for many distances (with the same rate 7.25%) which can be a crucial proof for the claim
introduction
This paper discusses the solar group geometrical structure, and provides a clear claim as following:
- The Solar group is created by an energy; which is transported through the group from point to another,
- This transported energy through the solar group, creates Solar Planets matters, orbital distances and other data
- The solar planets data are produced by this transported energy to give the chance for this transported energy to pass through
So
- The solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, at end of each canal the water creates a soil from its clay (energy), so all these canals are related to each other, effect on each other and also their different soils are related to each other, to the different canals and to the main river.
- The Previous idea gives us a general vision for the solar group whole structure,
- The main point is related to the energy
- As the river water is transported through the canals and create the canals forms and motions
- Very similar to that, the Energy is transported through the solar group creating the planets matters and suitable motions in harmony providing the chance for the energy to pass
This paper is divided into 2 parts as following:
Part One
• Point No.3 –Theory of Matter Creation
Part Two
The solar Group Creation as an application on "Matter Creation Theory"
• Introduction
• Point No.4 Jupiter Energy
• Point No.5 The Coherence Event
• Point No.6 Angle θ and Mars Data
• Point No.7 Solar Planets Motions Description
• Point No.8 Solar Masses Distribution
• Point No.9 Jupiter and inner planets relationships
• Point No. 10 Jupiter Origin Energy
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in the solar group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the Sun and the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will revolve around the Earth also because both of them connected by this same one line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it was correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the result will be the same, because both of them contributed to create the main line in the solar group
10- And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees yearly, as a circle motion
11- So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our wrong vision for the sun motion…
12- I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the sun, but Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13- The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14- The previous modification can give us some explanation for the Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which Mercury, Venus and Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth on 3/12/2012 (on the three Egyptian pyramids heads - appendix No.1),
15- Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun but also revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (IV)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Uranus Effect On Mercury Motion
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (III)
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day Period (Short Discussion)
Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?
Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry?
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
This document discusses the effects of Jupiter and Uranus on the geometry of the solar system. It hypothesizes that Jupiter has a horizontal effect that controls the XY plane and defines the consistency between planetary orbital inclinations. Uranus is proposed to have a vertical effect that defines the Z-axis and prevents planetary overturning motions by forcing same-direction revolution around the sun. Several equations are presented relating planetary data like distances, tilts, and inclinations to Jupiter's energy, circumference, and axial tilt, arguing this supports Jupiter having a dominant horizontal effect on solar system geometry. Uranus' effect is proposed to be seen in the inner planets' data being related to Uranus' 90 degree figures like its 97
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
What's hot (20)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
Jupiter And Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry
Similar to Does the moon move by gravity (nobel prize claim reason)
Special relativity hypothesis reason
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
(As A Train Motion)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Move In One General Motion (As A Train Motion)
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Solar Group Is Similar to One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Building (or solar group is similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it)
- Planets Motions is done As One Unified Motion
- As a train moves with all its carriages – similar to that – solar group moves one unified motion with all planets together
- Although Planets Velocities Are Different from each other – that – can't disprove this theory –because – as in any machine of gears – the different velocities of gears consist together the machine one general motion
This paper tries to prove this fact
The moon orbit analysis
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (III)
1.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that, "The Solar System Is One Machine"
2.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets is done by A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
3.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that m there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm /sec in the solar system.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Saturn Day Period Analysis (II) (Revised)
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and mars motions interaction
- The document discusses the author's hypothesis that there is an interaction between the motions of Earth, Moon, and Mars that causes Earth's 4-year rotational cycle.
- The author notes relationships between orbital periods of these bodies that current theories consider mere coincidences. The author aims to prove the motions are interacting using planetary data.
- Definitions of distance and time are proposed that view them as forms of energy observable from different frames of reference. A theory is presented that matter consists of "bright fringes" resulting from the coherence of light.
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (IV)
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon geometry
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Earth Be Found Before The Sun Creation
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, The Earth is Older Than The Sun
- The ages question provides an essential modification for the physics basic theories,
- Because,
- If Earth be found and moving before the sun creation, that disproves clearly and decisively Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- As a result, Earth and all other solar planets must move by a force different from the sun mass gravity.
- But, how to prove that, the Earth is older than the sun? The event be found before millions of years!
- Because the sun circles Earth and gives it one face only, that may prove the sun data be created depending on Earth orbital period (365.25 days) which proves that the sun must be created after the Earth creation.
Paper Objective
- The paper analyzes Earth orbital period to know Why The Sun Circles Earth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Moon Orbital Motion Analysis (III)
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
Jupiter Effect On Pluto Motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is the 2737 phenomenon a real one
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
The Moon Orbit Design (II)
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress? (Part II)
This document presents the author's hypothesis that the motions of objects in the solar system, including Earth and its moon, are governed by a single, unified motion rather than independent motions. The author provides several examples from astronomical data to support this idea, such as the harmonic cycles between Earth's orbit and the moon's orbit. The author aims to prove that all celestial bodies move together as parts of a single system or machine, transported by a common energy throughout the solar group.
Jupiter Data Creation
Abstract
Why Jupiter diameter =142984 km?
We have asked this question before … so why we need a new paper concerning this same question?!
I would write some theory in consistency with the physics book, But I can't!
While the big bang theory tells that the solar planets are created based random actions and events, I provide data proving that, no planet data can be created by any random process, on the contrary, planet data is created depending on each other and complementary to one another.
While the solar system current description tells that, each planet is a separated planet found independent from the other planets data. I provide crucial proves that the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building, and each planet data is created based on the other planets data – as in any creature body its leg data should be proportional to its hand data
While the current theory tells that, the sun is a star produces the sun rays based on nuclear interactions, I prove that, the sun is a mirror and the sun rays energy is produced by planets motion energies total. where Earth motion concentrates the planets motions energies total and produce the rays which is reflected to us as the sun rays…
While the current theory tells that, the matter data is created independently from any factors, I prove that, the matter dimensions are created in proportionality with space dimensions, both are created by light motion.
While the current theory tells us that, Jupiter is a common planet similar to many others, I prove that, Jupiter energy is the origin by which the solar planets are created
While the physics book tells that, the sun is created independently from the planets data, I prove that, The Sun Is Created Depending On Jupiter And Earth Specifically…
The question is, from where I brought these strange ideas?! From the planets data… i.e. I brought these ideas from the Truth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar eclipse geometry basics
The Sun diameter = 400 folds the moon diameter, but the Sun/ Earth distance= 400 folds the Moon/ Earth distance, for that reason the people on the Earth see the sun size equals the moon size approximately, that enables the total solar eclipse to be occurred before our eyes!
Is it just "a pure coincidence"? or there's a physical reason causes the equity of The Sun & Moon Angular Diameters to occur the solar eclipse.
The solar eclipse geometry basics
The Solar Eclipse Geometry Basics
The Sun diameter = 400 folds the moon diameter, but the Sun/ Earth distance= 400 folds the Moon/ Earth distance, for that reason the people on the Earth see the sun size equals the moon size approximately, that enables the total solar eclipse to be occurred before our eyes!
Is it just "a pure coincidence"? or there's a physical reason causes the equity of The Sun & Moon Angular Diameters to occur the solar eclipse
Similar to Does the moon move by gravity (nobel prize claim reason) (20)
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current description
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
This presentation covers the content and information on "Cytokines " and their role in immune regulation .
Randomised Optimisation Algorithms in DAPHNE
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Randomised Optimisation Algorithms in DAPHNE .
Austrian-Slovenian HPC Meeting 2024 – ASHPC24, Seeblickhotel Grundlsee in Austria, 10–13 June 2024
https://ashpc.eu/
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
Evaporation step counter work. I have done a physical experiment.
(Work in progress.)
如何办理(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证本科学位证书原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(uvic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero WaterTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business MeetingTravis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan,kP,Pakistan
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skillsEquivariant neural networks and representation theory
Or: Beyond linear.
Abstract: Equivariant neural networks are neural networks that incorporate symmetries. The nonlinear activation functions in these networks result in interesting nonlinear equivariant maps between simple representations, and motivate the key player of this talk: piecewise linear representation theory.
Disclaimer: No one is perfect, so please mind that there might be mistakes and typos.
dtubbenhauer@gmail.com
Corrected slides: dtubbenhauer.com/talks.html
Bob Reedy - Nitrate in Texas Groundwater.pdf
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business Meeting
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...University of Maribor
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intelligent Systems.
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
We will metaverse into the essence of immersive learning, into its three dimensions and conceptual models. This approach encompasses elements from teaching methodologies to social involvement, through organizational concerns and technologies. Challenging the perception of learning as knowledge transfer, we introduce a 'Uses, Practices & Strategies' model operationalized by the 'Immersive Learning Brain' and ‘Immersion Cube’ frameworks. This approach offers a comprehensive guide through the intricacies of immersive educational experiences and spotlighting research frontiers, along the immersion dimensions of system, narrative, and agency. Our discourse extends to stakeholders beyond the academic sphere, addressing the interests of technologists, instructional designers, and policymakers. We span various contexts, from formal education to organizational transformation to the new horizon of an AI-pervasive society. This keynote aims to unite the iLRN community in a collaborative journey towards a future where immersive learning research and practice coalesce, paving the way for innovative educational research and practice landscapes.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
Recently uploaded (20)
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
Cytokines and their role in immune regulation.pptx
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
Applied Science: Thermodynamics, Laws & Methodology.pdf
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically young
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Sharlene Leurig - Enabling Onsite Water Use with Net Zero Water
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST(TAT) cognitive abilities, creativity, and critic...
Equivariant neural networks and representation theory
Equivariant neural networks and representation theory
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
Immersive Learning That Works: Research Grounding and Paths Forward
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...
Does the moon move by gravity (nobel prize claim reason)
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 Does The Moon move By Gravity? (Nobel Prize Claim Reason – in physics 2018) By Gerges Francis Twadrous 2nd course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013 TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –6th October 2018 Abstract The Moon doesn't move by the gravity forces between his and Earth masses… The solar planet generally doesn't move by gravity forces.. This paper provides proves for this conclusion…. Why I claim against Nobel Prize Decision – in Physics -2018? Best Greetings I send this paper to support my claim against Nobel prize Board Decision in physics 2018. I recognize that, the decision follows the rules perfectly and no procedural error is found But at the other side, I claim because the physics book has a serious contradiction and no one tries to solve Shortly, we can't understand the solar group Geometry because of the classical concepts which prevent us to perform any progress In this paper I provide proves that the planet motion doesn't depend on the gravity… Supporting the main idea that, the solar group is one machine or one body and each planet is a member in this body, that's why the planet moves based on a cooperation with other planets and no planet can move independently … Nobel Prize Board faces the responsibility of Physics development support. That's why I still claim against the decision because we need help to overcome the wrong concepts and repair the science, seeking to perform a progress in the solar group geometry understating… With the Best Regards Gerges Francis Tawdrous TEL +201022532292 E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 1- Introduction In many physics books we read the following sentence… "Newton Mechanics does good job to explain the celestial bodies motions"! Simply It's not true …. ! I try here to prove that the moon motion doesn't depend on the gravity force.. many times I referred to Metonic Cycle which the moon rotates but the Earth doesn't, and asked how the follower planet rotates the cycle which his parent doesn't? but no answer I received! So in this paper, I provide many proves that, the Moon motion doesn't depend on gravity but depend on the moon data Again we have 2 visions in fighting about the solar group description The classical vision imagines that each planet is independent from the other planets and moves by gravity forces according to Newton Mechanics And My vision about the solar group description … let's remember it: The solar group is one Energy Trajectory and each solar planet is a point on this Trajectory of Energy. means solar planet matter is created from Energy (E=mc2 ) and solar planet orbital distance is created from the same Energy (my hypothesis) So, the solar group can be similar to a great river has many canals and these canals create soils on their banks, so the river with his canals and soils all of them are created from the same water (the same Energy). Based on that The solar planet motion depends on the planet data and not on the gravity… For full description please review my previous paper Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a claim against Nobel Prize board decision- in physics -2018) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053 what I will do in this paper? I show that, the moon different data is in harmony with the moon motion Then I'll conclude that the moon motion depends on his data and not on the gravity…. But What moon data I may use? Different data … for example the moon diameter… so if the moon moves by the gravity, how to make the moon diameter suitable for this motion...? Let's start our discussion to see if the proves are sufficient..
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 2- The Moon Motion I- Data Group No.1 1- 2- Note Please 2.58 x 27.3 = 2.41 x 29.53 = 71 mkm 3- 361 mkm = 71 mkm x 5.09 (moon orbital inclination = 5.1 degree) 4- 346.6 days (nadal year) = 327.6 days (sidereal year) + 19 days Group No.2 5- (Uranus axial tilt 97.8 degrees / moon axial tilt 6.7 degrees) = (Uranus diameter/ moon diameter) 6- Earth moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days by her real velocity 2.58 mkm a distance = 18000 mkm = Uranus orbital circumference. 7- If the moon moves 88000 daily so he moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days a distance =612 mkm But If the moon moves 2.41 mkm daily so he moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days a distance = 2π x Mars Uranus Distance But 8- 687 days (Mars orbital period)= 27.3 days (Moon orbital period) x 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) 9- 687 days (Mars orbital period)= 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9 (Mars orbital inclination) Group No.3 10-6939.75 seconds x 0.3 mkm /sec (c velocity) = 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) 11-2088 mkm x π = 6585.39 mkm (Note /Saros cycle =6585.39 days) monthsedreallunardays27.3 Monthsynodiclunardays29.53 mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon mkm2.58motiondailyEarth
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 II- Discussion Group No.1 Equation No. 1 What does this Equation tell us? In fact Earth daily motion = the moon orbit circumference at apogee point (r=406000km) That means I still search for the geometrical reason behind these relationships, but the current theories tell us that these relationships are found by Pure coincidences…! Equation No. 2 Note Please Earth daily motion 2.58 x 27.3 days "lunar sidereal month" = 71 mkm 2.41 mkm the Moon orbital circumference x 29.53 days "synodic sidereal month" = 71 mkm (the previous equation supposes that the moon revolves around the Earth one complete revolution daily, this idea I explained before), let's consider this idea as supposition only… Any way we have the value 71 mkm clearly… We know that 1 mkm = 1 degree Because Mercury orbital circumference = 360 mkm and = 360 degrees and if the solar group is one machine, so this rate 1 mkm= 1 degree can be used for any planet… That means 71 mkm = 71 degrees monthsedreallunardays27.3 Monthsynodiclunardays29.53 mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon mkm2.58motiondailyEarth monthsedreallunardays27.3 Monthsynodiclunardays29.53 mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon mkm2.58pointapogeeatncecircumfereorbitmoonThe
- 5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 5 Equation No. 3 361 degrees = 71 degrees x 5.09 degrees (moon orbital inclination = 5.1 degree) What does this Equation tell us? 361 degrees = Metonic Cycle all degrees because the moon orbit regress yearly 19 degrees and the Cycle continues for 19 sidereal years… = 361 degrees i.e. 361 degrees is the moon orbit motion during Metonic Cycle 71 degrees is produced from Equation No. 2, by Earth motion or by the moon motion 5.1 degrees The moon orbital inclination… I wish we see how the moon data is suitable with the moon motion… but what's the geometrical reason behind?! The conclusion which I can reach is There's a geometrical structure produces this data to be in harmony for the general motion but what's this geometrical structure or how this data is produced? I still search for.. Equation No. 4 346.6 days (nodal year) = 327.6 days (sidereal year) + 19 days The moon orbit regresses 19 degrees yearly which causes the eclipse calendar to regress also 19 days So 346.6 days (the Nodal Year) is produced by adding 19 days with the lunar sidereal year 327.6 days…. ! It's NOT pure coincidence…. There's a geometrical reason behind… but I can't reach it I wish the reader sees easily that, the gravity mystery has no effect in the moon data…. The gravity main difficulty is that, we have to ignore the planet data completely and keep by heart… by gravity the planet moves…!
- 6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 6 Group No.2 In this group I try to show that, Earth Uranus relationship effects on the moon motion Equation No. 5 Equation No. 6 Earth moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days by her real velocity 2.58 mkm a distance = 18000 mkm = Uranus orbital circumference. Equation No. 7 If the moon moves 88000 daily so he moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days a distance =612 mkm But If the moon moves 2.41 mkm daily (i.e. The moon revolves one revolution around Earth daily) so he moves during Metonic Cycle 6939.75 days a distance= 2π x 2644.6 mkm (Mars Uranus Distance) What's the value 612 mkm? I wish the reader remember my Equation d =r * 1092 where d = planet orbital distance and r=planet diameter… this equation we have studied in my previous paper… The equation works perfectly with Mercury, Earth and Saturn but with Uranus the Equation produced the value 612 mkm (51118 km x 1092 = 612 mkm) I don't know by what geometrical reasons this data is produced, but I know that there's a geometrical reasons behind… let's see the following 2 equations and comment after … Please review Saturn Data Proves Mars Immigration http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0301 Equation No. 8 687 days (Mars orbital period)= 27.3 days (Moon orbital period) x 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) Equation No. 9 687 days (Mars orbital period)= 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9 (Mars orbital inclination) The previous 2 equations tell us that, there's a close relationship between Mars, Earth and the Moon…. That's why Equation No. 7 produced 2644.6 mkm (Mars Uranus Distance) km3475DiameterMoonThe km51118DiameterUranus degrees6.7tiltaxialMoon degrees97.8tiltaxialUranus
- 7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 7 The comment and conclusion The previous data provides different vision for the solar planets from that vision provided by Newton Mechanics…. The planet can't be independent neither in his data nor in motion… the planet is a point on a trajectory with all other planets… That's why the gravity concept is a weak point in the physics book… simply it's not true concept because no planet is independent…. Eclipse phenomena shows this fact.. no one planet can do the job.. it's necessary to find a cooperation between Earth, Moon and the sun to perform the eclipse phenomena… But this cooperation can be found only if these 3 players data are produced to be in harmony to perform this cooperation… That's why we see the harmony in data between the Earth, Sun and Moon For example Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years) (Earth Motion) = 235 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months) (moon motion) = 20 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years) (moon orbit regression) Saros Cycle period = 6585.4 days = 223 x 29.53 days (235 Synodic Months) (moon motion) = 19 x 346.6 days (20 nodal years) (moon orbit regression) The previous data shows that … there's a harmony between Earth, Moon and moon orbit motions…. That's why the eclipse phenomena is occurred I wish the proof is clear and strong enough to be acceptable Where it's clear before our eyes that the planet can't move independently… But the planet moves based on a cooperation with other planets… That can support and explain the Equations no. 8 and 9
- 8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 8 Group No.3 Equation No. 10 6939.75 seconds x 0.3 mkm /sec (c velocity) = 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) Equation No. 11 2088 mkm x π = 6585.39 mkm (Note /Saros cycle =6585.39 days) In many papers I suggested that, the time and distance values can be equivalent in some situations in the solar group where we saw frequently that the same value is seen in time and distance units…(see The Time definition http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523) So Metonic Cycle period 6939.75 days can be used as 6939.75 mkm And Saros period 6585.39 days can be used as 6585.39 mkm …. The previous 2 equations explain to us the relationship between Metonic and Saros Cycle Let's summarize this relationship in following - Jupiter Uranus distance 2088 mkm can be passed by light (c velocity) during a period 6939.75 seconds… but Metonic Cycle is 6939.75 days and the conclusion is that the light energy during 6939.75 seconds is transported to the moon to move by it but with different rate of time 6939.75 days … - Now this distance 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) – its Circumference = 6585.39 mkm and if 1 mkm transported to be 1 day this value will = Saros Cycle period Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0559 The General Conclusion I wish I performed my objective…. The planet doesn't move by gravity… the planet can't move independently…. The solar group is one machine or one body and each planet moves as a member in this body for that reason each planet moves by other members cooperation… Author Other Papers Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053 Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0559 The Solar Group Main Equation (Part 2) http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0468 The Solar Group Main Equation http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0186 The Solar Group Main Energy http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0152 Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous All papers https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers+