This slide-deck from STAG software highlights good testing is to uncover those faults that have the potential to cause severe failures. The big question is “how good are the test cases to detect these faults?”
Test case potency assessment is primarily a diagnostic that assess the quality of test cases. This is one of the applications of HBT (Hypothesis Based Testing). This is boutique service offering from STAG Software Private Limited.
T Ashok CEO of STAG Software presented a talk on - Silence is Golden : The Power of Test case immunity at the SoftTec 2012 Conference on July 14, in Bangalore.
A case study - Implementation of smart test practices improves test coverage by 50% and adherence to regulatory compliance in all product releases enables STAG to gain
the trust and assist in all FDA audit of a leading compliance eLearning solutions provider.
STAG’s unique engineering approach to designing test cases enabled detection of critical defects and improved product maturity of a mobile phone application of a global embedded telecom solution provider, enabling go-to-market with high confidence.
The document describes a three-step approach to improving defect yield in testing:
1. Conduct a potency assessment to determine which types of defects are being targeted by current test cases and if any important types are missing.
2. Perform potential defect type re-targeting to add new test cases to cover additional defect types identified as missing.
3. Enhance existing test cases through potency improvement to ensure they are complete in uncovering defects.
This document discusses strategies for testing scripts using Test::More and Test::Trap. It addresses problems like scripts running as separate processes, loose code acting as main, exceptions and exit codes, providing stdin/stdout/stderr, stubbing and mocking, and more. Fifteen strategies are presented with "Problem", "Solution", and "But" sections to discuss challenges and additional considerations.
Test case potency assessment is primarily a diagnostic that assess the quality of test cases. This is one of the applications of HBT (Hypothesis Based Testing). This is boutique service offering from STAG Software Private Limited.
T Ashok CEO of STAG Software presented a talk on - Silence is Golden : The Power of Test case immunity at the SoftTec 2012 Conference on July 14, in Bangalore.
A case study - Implementation of smart test practices improves test coverage by 50% and adherence to regulatory compliance in all product releases enables STAG to gain
the trust and assist in all FDA audit of a leading compliance eLearning solutions provider.
STAG’s unique engineering approach to designing test cases enabled detection of critical defects and improved product maturity of a mobile phone application of a global embedded telecom solution provider, enabling go-to-market with high confidence.
The document describes a three-step approach to improving defect yield in testing:
1. Conduct a potency assessment to determine which types of defects are being targeted by current test cases and if any important types are missing.
2. Perform potential defect type re-targeting to add new test cases to cover additional defect types identified as missing.
3. Enhance existing test cases through potency improvement to ensure they are complete in uncovering defects.
This document discusses strategies for testing scripts using Test::More and Test::Trap. It addresses problems like scripts running as separate processes, loose code acting as main, exceptions and exit codes, providing stdin/stdout/stderr, stubbing and mocking, and more. Fifteen strategies are presented with "Problem", "Solution", and "But" sections to discuss challenges and additional considerations.
The document discusses how the form and structure of test cases is important. It states that form refers to the external presentation, while structure refers to the composition of elements. An effective form and structure can enable clarity of thinking, rapid test design, logical reviewability, and shorter automated test scripts. The document then provides examples of how applying a nine-dimensional structure and hierarchy to test cases through the Hypothesis Based Testing methodology can improve requirements questioning, test case yield and adequacy, defect detection, and automation maintenance.
STAG provides software testing services using its proprietary Hypothesis Based Testing (HBT) methodology. HBT is a six-stage, scientific approach to testing powered by eight disciplines of thinking. Case studies show HBT finds 2-3 times as many defects as conventional testing and improves productivity. Customers report higher quality software and up to 3 times return on investment when using STAG's services.
There is no single best practice for determining which test cases to automate, as it depends on many factors related to the environment, potential impacts, and costs versus benefits of automation. Some good candidates for automation include repetitive tests, stable features and modules, smoke tests, tasks with complex calculations, tests requiring regular environment setup, and tests that are difficult for humans to perform but easy for computers. The decision should balance the potential return on investment from automating tests against the effort required to automate.
This is the webinar recording on the topic ‘Test Case Immunity’- Optimize testing. In this webinar we have conveyed an interesting idea of measuring “Test Case Immunity” to logically assess what test cases to drop by so that we can 'do none'
Guideto Successful Application Test Automationaimshigh7
The document discusses test automation, including its objectives, benefits, misconceptions, and challenges. It provides a checklist for test automation implementation, covering criteria for choosing an automation tool, defining requirements, designing the architecture, creating test data, implementing coding standards, and maintaining automated tests. The key goals are to understand test automation concepts, what it takes to implement effective automation, and techniques to emphasize maintainability.
The document discusses object-oriented programming concepts like classes, objects, inheritance, encapsulation, and composition. It provides examples of how these concepts can be implemented in Java. It explains that a class defines common attributes and behaviors of objects, while an object is an instance of a class. Inheritance allows classes to extend and override methods of parent classes. Encapsulation involves making attributes private and accessing them via getter/setter methods. Composition refers to objects having other objects as members.
Agile Testing Framework - The Art of Automated TestingDimitri Ponomareff
Once your organization has successfully implemented Agile methodologies, there are two major areas that will require improvements: Continuous Integration and Automated Testing.
This presentation illustrates why it's important to invest in an Automated Testing Framework (ATF) to reduce technical debt, increase quality and accelerate time to market.
Learn more at www.agiletestingframework.com.
This outlines FIVE key application scenarios of validation using doSmartQA, a smart probing assistant to test deeply & rapidly.
It facilitates rapid testing in short sessions of Recon, Explore & Recoup, based on HyBIST -
‘Hypothesis Based Immersive Session Testing’, an intellectual practice of probing.
“Despite all the testing we do, field issues do not seem to abate. Sometimes it is a few serious issues that cause us to react intensely, sometimes it is a bunch of simple issues that make us consume bandwidth. Clearly the backlog is building up, with debts to be serviced, straining capacity to deliver new ideas.”
This is what I hear from senior engineering managers of product companies. How do you go about fixing this? Well, I have seen a flurry of activity to identify root cause(s) and address them. They help to set focus, but fizzle out.
Analysing 'quality of technical debt’ to understand types of issues that leak enables practical actions, rather than jumping into the ‘reason of why’ (root cause). Smart QA it is, to do failure analytics differently, to ‘tighten the purse’.
Technical debt is indeed a serious drain on engineering capacity, forcing one to fix issues at the expense of building revenue yielding new features. Smart failure analytics visualises problems well, enabling clear actions to strengthen practice and reduce debt significantly.
If you are “choked by technical debt”, then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can exploit technology.
"We track a lot of metrics related to progress of development and quality every sprint, like backlogs, technical debt, velocity, task status etc. What is not very evident is the 'quality of movement' i.e. how well done, so that we create less debt as we move. How can I get a better insight of the quality of tests done and a more objective measure of product quality?"
Extrinsic metrics are easier to measure and give visibility of direction, progress, speed and external feel of product quality. Intrinsic metrics are deeper, harder to measure but can give greater insight into the quality of work. Measuring this requires a good structure and organisation of test artefacts. The benefit - a greater insight into effectiveness of outcome and therefore lower technical debt & greater acceleration, don't you think?
Metrics can be classified as measuring work progress, work quality, product quality and practice quality. Except for the first one on work progress where we have a lot of measures facilitated by project and test management tools, the others depend on test organisation and clarity of types of issues to uncover. 'Quality Levels' based on HBT (Hypothesis Based Testing) provides a strong foundation for these, enabling you to assess potential test effectiveness, judge product quality objectively and fine tune practice quality .
If you are keen on "insightful quality metrics", then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can see clearly and do far better.
“As we embrace faster release cycles, testing has become a bottleneck. Yes, we have embraced automation as the way forward. We have a huge regression suite and therefore a big backlog for automation, a tough balance to speed up and yet maintain the fast paced release rhythm. What can I do?”
Automated tests are great to monitor a system’s health. Rather than just use regression as the candidate for automation, key flows that signify the pulse of a system's health are superior, don’t you think? And, this won’t create a huge backlog for automation, right?
Most often I have seen automation embraced as the solution to speed up testing. Conceptually correct it is, the problem is - what makes it worth the while to automate? Automated tests have to be in sync with the product and are therefore not a one time effort.
Choosing the right ones implies, it needs to be at the level of user flow, and be a clear indicator of health. Unless test scenarios are well structured and organised, choosing the right ones will turn out to be difficult, and ultimately weigh you down. It then becomes a pursuit of catching up with automation rather than making it work for you.
The goal is not 100% automation, it really is no leakage of defects. Automated tests are really ‘checks’ that assess key paths for good health (correctness) while intelligent human tests are focused on finding issues(robustness). A harmonious balance between these two enables clean code to be delivered without being weighed down by automation.
If you are “weighed down by automation“, then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can exploit technology.
Inspired by how the world is handling Covid19, this slideshare lists actions taken and criteria met to contain the pandemic and correlate this to how we can deliver clean code for large scale software systems. This article focuses on the process flow and criteria for delivering clean code.
The document outlines 7 thinking tools to help with rapid testing:
1. Landscaper - Do a survey to understand the big picture
2. Persona map - Map out who uses what
3. Scope map - Map out user expectations
4. Interaction map - Map what may affect what
5. Environment map - Map test environments
6. Scenario creator - Create test scenarios
7. Dashboard - Stop, analyze, and refine
These tools are part of an immersive session testing approach using reconnaissance, exploration, and rest/recovery phases to facilitate rapid yet thorough scientific exploration. A related SaaS tool called doSmartQA will offer these tools and interested users can email the founder for
Agile and automation have been great enablers to doing tests faster. How we can accelerate further to accomplish more by doing less is the objective of this webinar.
“Left-shifting” by smart decomposition of dev testing aided by smart lightweight aids to perform rapid dev testing will be the takeaways of this webinar.
Three ideas to regression test smarter and outline THREE AIDS to do this.
AID #1: Fault propagation analyser - Figure out how what-to-retest by doing a smarter impact analysis using a scientific approach to understanding fault propagation due to change.
AID #2 : Automation analyser - Ensure scenarios are fit-to-automate so that they are easily scriptable and easily maintainable
AID #3 : Yield analyser : Figure out how much not to regress by analysing defect yields over time to understand what parts of the system have been hardened
Well, automation is an obvious choice, ensure that the scenarios are “fit enough for automation” so that you don’t end spend much effort maintaining the scripts to be in sync with every change.
Drawing inspiration from Atul Gawande's book "The checklist manifesto", T Ashok, CEO, STAG Software, explores at how we can exploit the power of checklist to delivering good quality code.
Drawing inspiration from Atul Gawande's book "The checklist manifesto", T Ashok, CEO, STAG Software, explores at how we can exploit the power of checklist to delivering good quality code.
This document outlines a structured and scientific approach to designing tests for user stories. It discusses four types of entities to test: individual user stories, sets of user stories for an epic, sets of user stories that form a flow, and sets of user stories across releases. It also describes eight levels of quality to test for. The approach involves first understanding what to test and what criteria to test for. Test cases are then designed using techniques like thinking and proving correctness statically or executing and evaluating dynamically. Conditions that govern behavior are extracted to develop test scenarios that stimulate different behaviors.
This document discusses how to establish a clear baseline for testing user stories. It defines a baseline as a cartesian product of "what to test" and "test for what". What to test includes individual user stories and collections of user stories spanning epics. Test for what refers to acceptance criteria such as functionality, performance, security, and usability. Different types of tests are mapped to these criteria. Together, what to test and test for what form the baseline, and applying strategies like thinking and proving or executing and evaluating tests establishes a clear approach to validating user stories.
Part1 of Tri-webinar series consisting of three webinars commencing with 'How-to question to understand an user story and identify gaps', moving onto 'How-to set clear baseline' to ensure an effective strategy, and finally culminating with 'How-to design test scenarios/cases' using a scientific and disciplined approach
The document discusses how the form and structure of test cases is important. It states that form refers to the external presentation, while structure refers to the composition of elements. An effective form and structure can enable clarity of thinking, rapid test design, logical reviewability, and shorter automated test scripts. The document then provides examples of how applying a nine-dimensional structure and hierarchy to test cases through the Hypothesis Based Testing methodology can improve requirements questioning, test case yield and adequacy, defect detection, and automation maintenance.
STAG provides software testing services using its proprietary Hypothesis Based Testing (HBT) methodology. HBT is a six-stage, scientific approach to testing powered by eight disciplines of thinking. Case studies show HBT finds 2-3 times as many defects as conventional testing and improves productivity. Customers report higher quality software and up to 3 times return on investment when using STAG's services.
There is no single best practice for determining which test cases to automate, as it depends on many factors related to the environment, potential impacts, and costs versus benefits of automation. Some good candidates for automation include repetitive tests, stable features and modules, smoke tests, tasks with complex calculations, tests requiring regular environment setup, and tests that are difficult for humans to perform but easy for computers. The decision should balance the potential return on investment from automating tests against the effort required to automate.
This is the webinar recording on the topic ‘Test Case Immunity’- Optimize testing. In this webinar we have conveyed an interesting idea of measuring “Test Case Immunity” to logically assess what test cases to drop by so that we can 'do none'
Guideto Successful Application Test Automationaimshigh7
The document discusses test automation, including its objectives, benefits, misconceptions, and challenges. It provides a checklist for test automation implementation, covering criteria for choosing an automation tool, defining requirements, designing the architecture, creating test data, implementing coding standards, and maintaining automated tests. The key goals are to understand test automation concepts, what it takes to implement effective automation, and techniques to emphasize maintainability.
The document discusses object-oriented programming concepts like classes, objects, inheritance, encapsulation, and composition. It provides examples of how these concepts can be implemented in Java. It explains that a class defines common attributes and behaviors of objects, while an object is an instance of a class. Inheritance allows classes to extend and override methods of parent classes. Encapsulation involves making attributes private and accessing them via getter/setter methods. Composition refers to objects having other objects as members.
Agile Testing Framework - The Art of Automated TestingDimitri Ponomareff
Once your organization has successfully implemented Agile methodologies, there are two major areas that will require improvements: Continuous Integration and Automated Testing.
This presentation illustrates why it's important to invest in an Automated Testing Framework (ATF) to reduce technical debt, increase quality and accelerate time to market.
Learn more at www.agiletestingframework.com.
This outlines FIVE key application scenarios of validation using doSmartQA, a smart probing assistant to test deeply & rapidly.
It facilitates rapid testing in short sessions of Recon, Explore & Recoup, based on HyBIST -
‘Hypothesis Based Immersive Session Testing’, an intellectual practice of probing.
“Despite all the testing we do, field issues do not seem to abate. Sometimes it is a few serious issues that cause us to react intensely, sometimes it is a bunch of simple issues that make us consume bandwidth. Clearly the backlog is building up, with debts to be serviced, straining capacity to deliver new ideas.”
This is what I hear from senior engineering managers of product companies. How do you go about fixing this? Well, I have seen a flurry of activity to identify root cause(s) and address them. They help to set focus, but fizzle out.
Analysing 'quality of technical debt’ to understand types of issues that leak enables practical actions, rather than jumping into the ‘reason of why’ (root cause). Smart QA it is, to do failure analytics differently, to ‘tighten the purse’.
Technical debt is indeed a serious drain on engineering capacity, forcing one to fix issues at the expense of building revenue yielding new features. Smart failure analytics visualises problems well, enabling clear actions to strengthen practice and reduce debt significantly.
If you are “choked by technical debt”, then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can exploit technology.
"We track a lot of metrics related to progress of development and quality every sprint, like backlogs, technical debt, velocity, task status etc. What is not very evident is the 'quality of movement' i.e. how well done, so that we create less debt as we move. How can I get a better insight of the quality of tests done and a more objective measure of product quality?"
Extrinsic metrics are easier to measure and give visibility of direction, progress, speed and external feel of product quality. Intrinsic metrics are deeper, harder to measure but can give greater insight into the quality of work. Measuring this requires a good structure and organisation of test artefacts. The benefit - a greater insight into effectiveness of outcome and therefore lower technical debt & greater acceleration, don't you think?
Metrics can be classified as measuring work progress, work quality, product quality and practice quality. Except for the first one on work progress where we have a lot of measures facilitated by project and test management tools, the others depend on test organisation and clarity of types of issues to uncover. 'Quality Levels' based on HBT (Hypothesis Based Testing) provides a strong foundation for these, enabling you to assess potential test effectiveness, judge product quality objectively and fine tune practice quality .
If you are keen on "insightful quality metrics", then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can see clearly and do far better.
“As we embrace faster release cycles, testing has become a bottleneck. Yes, we have embraced automation as the way forward. We have a huge regression suite and therefore a big backlog for automation, a tough balance to speed up and yet maintain the fast paced release rhythm. What can I do?”
Automated tests are great to monitor a system’s health. Rather than just use regression as the candidate for automation, key flows that signify the pulse of a system's health are superior, don’t you think? And, this won’t create a huge backlog for automation, right?
Most often I have seen automation embraced as the solution to speed up testing. Conceptually correct it is, the problem is - what makes it worth the while to automate? Automated tests have to be in sync with the product and are therefore not a one time effort.
Choosing the right ones implies, it needs to be at the level of user flow, and be a clear indicator of health. Unless test scenarios are well structured and organised, choosing the right ones will turn out to be difficult, and ultimately weigh you down. It then becomes a pursuit of catching up with automation rather than making it work for you.
The goal is not 100% automation, it really is no leakage of defects. Automated tests are really ‘checks’ that assess key paths for good health (correctness) while intelligent human tests are focused on finding issues(robustness). A harmonious balance between these two enables clean code to be delivered without being weighed down by automation.
If you are “weighed down by automation“, then you may find our SmartQA consulting (stagsoftware.com/smartqa) interesting, where we unshackle your practice so that you can exploit technology.
Inspired by how the world is handling Covid19, this slideshare lists actions taken and criteria met to contain the pandemic and correlate this to how we can deliver clean code for large scale software systems. This article focuses on the process flow and criteria for delivering clean code.
The document outlines 7 thinking tools to help with rapid testing:
1. Landscaper - Do a survey to understand the big picture
2. Persona map - Map out who uses what
3. Scope map - Map out user expectations
4. Interaction map - Map what may affect what
5. Environment map - Map test environments
6. Scenario creator - Create test scenarios
7. Dashboard - Stop, analyze, and refine
These tools are part of an immersive session testing approach using reconnaissance, exploration, and rest/recovery phases to facilitate rapid yet thorough scientific exploration. A related SaaS tool called doSmartQA will offer these tools and interested users can email the founder for
Agile and automation have been great enablers to doing tests faster. How we can accelerate further to accomplish more by doing less is the objective of this webinar.
“Left-shifting” by smart decomposition of dev testing aided by smart lightweight aids to perform rapid dev testing will be the takeaways of this webinar.
Three ideas to regression test smarter and outline THREE AIDS to do this.
AID #1: Fault propagation analyser - Figure out how what-to-retest by doing a smarter impact analysis using a scientific approach to understanding fault propagation due to change.
AID #2 : Automation analyser - Ensure scenarios are fit-to-automate so that they are easily scriptable and easily maintainable
AID #3 : Yield analyser : Figure out how much not to regress by analysing defect yields over time to understand what parts of the system have been hardened
Well, automation is an obvious choice, ensure that the scenarios are “fit enough for automation” so that you don’t end spend much effort maintaining the scripts to be in sync with every change.
Drawing inspiration from Atul Gawande's book "The checklist manifesto", T Ashok, CEO, STAG Software, explores at how we can exploit the power of checklist to delivering good quality code.
Drawing inspiration from Atul Gawande's book "The checklist manifesto", T Ashok, CEO, STAG Software, explores at how we can exploit the power of checklist to delivering good quality code.
This document outlines a structured and scientific approach to designing tests for user stories. It discusses four types of entities to test: individual user stories, sets of user stories for an epic, sets of user stories that form a flow, and sets of user stories across releases. It also describes eight levels of quality to test for. The approach involves first understanding what to test and what criteria to test for. Test cases are then designed using techniques like thinking and proving correctness statically or executing and evaluating dynamically. Conditions that govern behavior are extracted to develop test scenarios that stimulate different behaviors.
This document discusses how to establish a clear baseline for testing user stories. It defines a baseline as a cartesian product of "what to test" and "test for what". What to test includes individual user stories and collections of user stories spanning epics. Test for what refers to acceptance criteria such as functionality, performance, security, and usability. Different types of tests are mapped to these criteria. Together, what to test and test for what form the baseline, and applying strategies like thinking and proving or executing and evaluating tests establishes a clear approach to validating user stories.
Part1 of Tri-webinar series consisting of three webinars commencing with 'How-to question to understand an user story and identify gaps', moving onto 'How-to set clear baseline' to ensure an effective strategy, and finally culminating with 'How-to design test scenarios/cases' using a scientific and disciplined approach
"Language shapes the way you think" was the topic of the talk presented by T Ashok, CEO STAG Software, to a group of test professionals at a Pune-based IT services and solutions provider on June 16, 2014.
The document describes STAG Software's HBT Quality Visualization Tool. The tool allows users to assess quality across three areas in 3 sentences:
1) Are test assets good? It evaluates the quality of test cases by analyzing factors like applicable test types, test case counts by importance and quality level, and positive/negative ratios.
2) Have we assessed completely? It measures the quality of execution by analyzing execution metrics like percentages completed by test, entity, quality level, and progress over cycles.
3) How good are the outcomes? It determines the quality of the product/application by calculating a cleanliness index based on passed and total test cases, and analyzing performance by entity, cleanliness criteria, and
This presentation on Hypothesis Based Testing (HBT) was delivered by Mr Satvik Kini, Associate Quality Manager, Suite Test Centre, SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd at STeP-IN Forum webinar on Dec 19, 2013.
The document outlines an approach called "Descriptive-Prescriptive" for better problem solving. It involves first describing a problem by connecting elements and details to understand it fully ("Analysis"), then prescribing rules and conditions to formulate a solution ("Synthesis"). This approach can be applied to test baselining, strategy formulation, test design, and reporting. Diagrams and examples are provided to illustrate applying description and prescription at different stages. The approach forms the basis of a personal test methodology called HBT, which uses six stages and eight disciplines of thinking.
STAG’s assessment for test case potency of a cloud-based trading software helps reduce
regression test cases by 28% and regression cycle time by 40% for an award-winning B2B
e-commerce company.
An article by T Ashok, Founder & CEO, STAG Software,where he highlights that metrics can help drive change in behavior to do better.This article was published in the TeaTime with Testers, Feb-Mar 2013 issue of ezine.
STAG transforms the test process to enable effective product assessment and certification of product fitness for beta release, which helps protect the investment in product development for a leading Fleet Management solution provider.
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Do you know the potency of your test cases?
1. Do you know the
“Potency” of your test cases?
T Ashok
ash@stagsoftware.com
in.linkedin.com/in/AshokSTAG
ash_thiru
Webinar: Jan 19, 2012, 1430-1530 IST